A preview of this full-text is provided by The Royal Society.
Content available from Philosophical Transactions B
This content is subject to copyright.
rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org
Introduction
Cite this article: Brose U, Hillebrand H. 2016
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
in dynamic landscapes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
371: 20150267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0267
Accepted: 22 February 2016
One contribution of 17 to a theme issue
‘Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in
dynamic landscapes’.
Subject Areas:
ecology, environmental science,
theoretical biology
Keywords:
disturbance, species richness, varying
environmental conditions, food webs,
meta-communities, spatial and temporal scales
Author for correspondence:
Ulrich Brose
e-mail: ulrich.brose@idiv.de
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
in dynamic landscapes
Ulrich Brose1,2 and Helmut Hillebrand3
1
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e,
04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743 Jena, Germany
3
Institute for Chemistry and Biology of Marine Environments (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg,
Schleusenstrasse 1, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) and
its consequence for ecosystem services has predominantly been studied by
controlled, short-term and small-scale experiments under standardized
environmental conditions and constant community compositions. However,
changes in biodiversity occur in real-world ecosystems with varying environ-
ments and a dynamic community composition. In this themeissue, we present
novel research on BEF in such dynamic communities. The contributions are
organized in three sections on BEF relationships in (i) multi-trophic diversity,
(ii) non-equilibrium biodiversity under disturbance and varying environ-
mental conditions, and (iii) large spatial and long temporal scales. The first
section shows that multi-trophic BEF relationships often appear idiosyncratic,
while accounting for species traits enables a predictive understanding. Future
BEF research on complex communities needs to include ecological theory that
is based on first principles of species-averaged body masses, stoichiometry and
effects of environmental conditions such as temperature. The second section
illustrates that disturbance and varying environments have direct as well as
indirect (via changes in species richness, community composition and species’
traits) effects on BEF relationships. Fluctuations in biodiversity (species rich-
ness, community composition and also trait dominance within species) can
severely modify BEF relationships. The third section demonstrates that BEF
at larger spatial scales is driven by different variables. While species richness
per se and community biomass are most important, species identity effects
and community composition are less important than at small scales. Across
long temporal scales, mass extinctions represent severe changes in biodiversity
with mixed effects on ecosystem functions. Together, the contributions of this
theme issue identify new research frontiers and answer some open questions
on BEF relationships in dynamic communities of real-world landscapes.
1. Introduction
Twenty-five years of research on the role of biodiversity in ecosystem processes
and services has yielded an impressive body of literature. Generalizing over
several hundred studies, there is clear evidence that the loss of biodiversity
from a certain trophic group of species results in their reduced biomass pro-
duction, associated with reduced efficiency of resource capture [1 – 3]. This
relationship has been primarily observed in communities of autotrophs such
as plants [4–7], but also holds in consumers of plant or animal resources
[8–10] and decomposers feeding on dead organic material [11,12]. In fact, the
loss of biodiversity across trophic levels has been predicted to show even stron-
ger effects owing to the strong connection between consumer – resource energy
fluxes and ecosystem processes [2,13,14]. The primary focus of BEF research has
been on bivariate relationships between biodiversity and a single ecosystem
process [1,4], but recent studies have provided strong evidence that the real
functional importance of biodiversity lies in maintaining multiple ecosystem
processes across environmental fluctuations in time or space [5,15]. The effects
of biodiversity loss are rapidly seen when multiple functions are monitored
&2016 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.