Logistic regression is an important tool for wildlife habitat-selection studies, but the method frequently has been misapplied due to an inadequate understanding of the logistic model, its interpretation, and the influ- ence of sampling design. Topromote better use of this method, we review its application and interpretation under 3 sampling designs: random, case–control, and use–availability. Logistic regression is appropriate for habitat use–nonuse,studies employing,random,sampling,and can be used to directly model,the conditional,probability of use in such cases. Logistic regression also is appropriate for studies employing case–control sampling designs, but careful attention is required to interpret results correctly. Unless bias can be estimated or probability of use is small for all habitats, results of case–control studies should be interpreted as odds ratios, rather than probability of use orrelative probability of use. When data are gathered under a use–availability design, logistic regression can be used to estimate approximate odds ratios if probability of use is small, at least on average. More generally, howev- er, logistic regression is inappropriatefor modeling habitat selection in use–availability studies. In particular, using logistic regression to fit the exponential,model,of Manly et al. (2002:100) does not guarantee,maximum-likelihood estimates, valid probabilities, or valid likelihoods. We show that the resource selection function (RSF) commonly used for the exponential model is proportional to a logistic discriminant function. Thus, it may be used to rank habitats with respect to probability of use and to identify important habitat characteristics or their surrogates, but itis not guaranteed ,to be ,proportional ,to probability ,of use. Other problems ,associated with the exponential model,also are discussed. We describe,an alternative,model,based on Lancaster,and Imbens (1996) that offers a method for estimating conditional probability of use in use–availability studies. Although promising, this model fails to converge ,to a ,unique ,solution in some ,important ,situations. Further work ,is needed ,to obtain ,a robust method,that is broadly applicable to use–availability studies. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 68(4):774–789 Key words: bias, case–control, contaminated control, exponential model, habitat modeling, log-binomial model, logis-