Exclusion is the process by which some people are left out/excluded from a group or situation. It can also be described as an incident/s where an individual is ostracised, with associated feelings of alienation and of being sidelined. In the workplace, exclusion has significant effects on a person’s relationships, opportunities, and career journey.
Inclusion, on the other hand, is at the heart of an individual’s psychological needs: the need to belong, to be treated with dignity and respect, to experience a sense of autonomy, competence, self-confidence and self-esteem, and to have a meaningful existence. According to Maslow’s (1943) hierarchy of needs, once people have satisfied their physiological needs for food, shelter and safety, we turn our attention to love and a sense of belonging, feeling valued and ultimately, self-actualisation. Understanding what people’s needs are, and what motivates them, are central to any successful organisational practice. As a consequence, inclusivity and integration in the workplace contribute greatly towards securing those values of human dignity and respect, equality, freedom, and psychological well-being that give people’s lives direction and meaning. Our research explores the stories of the research respondents with regard to experiencing the opposite – feeling excluded, alienated, marginalised, and discriminated against, and we explore the psychological-, behavioural- and organisational effects of their lived experiences.
While some progress has been made towards building a more inclusive society, this research finds that we are still far from achieving the human rights goals espoused since the dream of equality was voiced by great leaders worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has further shone a light on the consequences of unequal access and disparate resources for sustaining societies around the globe – and exposed how systemic divisions have been exacerbated. The United Nations 2030 agenda report describes social exclusion as a state in which individuals are unable to participate fully in economic, social, political and cultural life, and it underscores the conditions leading to the state of exclusion. It is evident that despite some action to provide legal protection from discrimination for certain groups or individuals, people continue to experience exclusion. The respondents in this research shared that, even though their fight against dehumanisation continues, there is an increased amplification on deculturalisation and defeminisation.
Correspondingly, affirmative action, has somewhat improved levels of diversity in many organisations, but it has not resulted in individuals necessarily feeling fully accepted or credibly included. The consequence of this is that many employees attempt to acculturate to the dominant/prototypical culture in a company, thereby sacrificing their authenticity. For instance, economic minorities and the less organisationally-powerful may aspire and attempt to change their accents, suppress their own heritage, cultures and interests, engage in skin whitening and straighten their hair to more closely resemble the dominant and economically powerful white, and largely, male group in senior organisational positions. This deculturalisation results in tension within their own psyche, leading to guilt as a result of abandoning their heritage, causing continuous struggles to find congruency between personal values and behaviours, and even leads to the splitting of personalities to form dual or multiple identities within these individuals.
The research respondents also continue to struggle with workplace gender inequality, having cited examples ranging from conscious sexual harassment and sexist jokes to ‘unconscious’ bias and microaggressions and micro-insults ̶ where colleagues discriminated against the research respondents without ‘apparently’ even realising it. Such exclusion has led to numerous psychological and behavioural effects ranging from discomfort and withdrawal to paranoia and depression, all of which had repercussions for productivity and led to delays and even retrogression in the career aspirations for the research respondents. It has also led to defeminisation ̶ where a few research respondents adopted typically masculine behaviours to advance their career paths to more senior and executive roles, to break through the glass ceiling and to simply cope in a male-dominated environment.
This research uncovered a number of additional reasons for employees feeling excluded, ranging from not being deemed traditionally attractive or tall enough, to educational background and socio-economic differences. These are unprotected differences (unprotected by country laws), and those who experience them do not have the legal authority to challenge such discriminatory behaviour. Many are silenced by shame because their colleagues do not experience the same daily challenges and do not experience being atypical/minority or different from the currently dominant group in management and leadership positions. This research presents an opportunity to turn up the volume of their voices, having adopted a hermeneutic phenomenological methodology to form theory and share their lived experiences (voices) with the reader.
While some company executives may balk at the idea of spending more time and effort on integrating and engaging staff, it is helpful to point out that, in addition to legal considerations – the costs of litigation for workplace bullying and harassment, brand damage, poor industrial relations and ultimately future difficulty in attracting prospective talent are issues resulting in great cost to the company and are critical for the long-term sustainability and success of the company. It is clear that there are many business advantages to ensuring an inclusive work environment. Happy workers are more productive, and companies with more diverse management teams have been shown, on average, to achieve 19% higher revenues. In general, greater diversity has been shown to reduce work errors and the need for rework, companies enjoy enhanced reputations, greater access to untapped talent, and access to and a greater understanding of new markets and stakeholders. These benefits are dampened when marginalised individuals and groups focus their efforts more towards adapting and assimilating to the dominant culture of the organisation.
Research respondents shared ways in which people could be made to feel more included. Workplace initiatives to deconstruct and redress historic power through progressive policies and procedures, managing risks and ensuring legal compliance, encouraging coherence between individual and organisational value systems, and providing resources and opportunities for employees to engage in deep, personal work around self-awareness and self-management, can promote inclusion from all levels of the organisation (top-down and bottom-up). Greater flexibility in working conditions (remote vs. office working vs. hybrid) for employees could also allow for more effective balancing of family and care roles with work, as well as provide for more effective social distancing and safety, and can result in greater engagement and an increased feeling of well-being on the part of the employee.
While company training programmes and policies can be effective in promoting inclusion, simple initiatives can also go a long way to make co-workers feel included. By becoming more attuned to identifying people who are feeling excluded, we can ensure greater inclusivity. For example, recognising if some co-workers are unable to join colleagues for a meal out due to financial or personal time constraints, or identifying colleagues who may feel excluded at drinks at a pub as it contravenes their religious practices or personal preferences, and subsequently accommodating for these individual differences can trigger greater inclusion. Instead, opting for a cup of coffee or having a chat in the office kitchen or canteen can allow more co-workers to join in and actively be included.
Legislation for protecting marginalised groups exists, and the responsibility for inclusion shifts from the government to leaders and, ultimately, to us. For example, by offering/arranging a lift for someone who may need to take unsafe and unreliable public transport when working late on a project for instance, shows an understanding of intersectional experiences in the workplace. It is this awareness and compassion that allows one to recognise colleagues who are excluded, and any positive act in response to their feelings of exclusion, can trigger a team to gel and outperform those who do not.