... In addition, the few published studies on Chinese SMFEs are very narrow in focus and cover only a scattered range of areas such as the drivers/barriers to international growth (Ahlstrom, Young, Chan, & Bruton, 2004;Cardoza & Fornes, 2011a;Carney, 1998;Tsang, 2001;, the environment faced by Chinese SMFEs (Boisot & Meyer, 2008;Poutziouris, Wang, & Chan, 2002), the human resources practices (Zheng, O'Neill, & Morrison, 2009), the institutional barriers to innovation and growth (Carney & Gedajlovic, 2002;Zhu, Wittmann, & Peng, 2011), the marketing and IT capability performance (Siu, Fang, & Lin, 2004;Zhang, Sarker, & Sarker, 2008), the relation between entrepreneurship and internationalisation (Li, Zhao, Tan, & Liu, 2008;Liu, Xiao, & Huang, 2008;Yamakawa, Peng, & Deeds, 2008), the financing of high-tech SMFEs (Xiao, 2011), the relation between networks and international development (Chu, 1996;Tang, 2011;Zhou, Wu, & Luo, 2007), the organisation/performance of SMFEs overseas (Gebre-Egziabher, 2007;Rademakers, 1998;Tsang, 2002;Wai-chung Yeung, 2000;Weidenbaum, 1996), the historical evolution of SMFEs (Po-yin Chung, 2005;Poutziouris et al., 2002), the transition and professional management (Chung & Yuen, 2003;Tan & Fock, 2001;Tsui-Auch, 2004), or SMFEs and Dunning's OLI paradigm (Erdener & Shapiro, 2005). This limited number of published articles is far from constituting a strong body of literature on Chinese SMFEs in general and on their international expansion in particular. ...