... Numerical hydrological models offer universal descriptions of physical processes, more accurately reflect human activ-ities′ impacts, and provide a scientific basis for coupling with other physical processes (hydrothermal coupling, pollutant transport, vegetation dynamics), which has become an emerging and important direction in hydrological modeling in recent decades (Hu et al., 2007;Wang et al., 2008;Maxwell et al., 2014;Paniconi and Putti, 2015;Hrachowitz and Clark, 2017;Peel and McMahon, 2020;Shu L C et al., 2022;Figure 3 Schematic diagram of hydrological model classification (blue italicized text in the diagram represents representative models of each category. The models included are Xin'anjiang (Zhao and Wang, 1988), unit hydrograph (Sherman, 1932), HBV (Bergström, 1992), FLEX (Gharari et al., 2014), TOPMODEL (Beven and Kirkby, 1979), SWAT (Arnold et al., 1998), VIC (Liang et al., 1994), PRMS (Leavesley et al., 1983), WRF-Hydro (Gochis et al., 2018), WEP (Jia et al., 2001), GBHM (Yang et al., 1998), GSFlow (Markstrom et al., 2008), HEIFlow Zheng et al., 2020;Han et al., 2021), GSFLOW-SWMM (Tian et al., 2015), SWAT-MODFLOW (Park et al., 2019), FEFLOW-3D (Hu et al., 2020), SHUD (Shu et al., 2020), PIHM (Qu and Duffy, 2007), MIKE-SHE (Refsgaard and Storm, 1996), HMS (Yu et al., 1999(Yu et al., , 2006Yu, 2000), ParFlow (Kollet and Maxwell, 2006), PAWS (Shen and Phanikumar, 2010), HydroGeoSphere (Aquanty, 2013), CATHY (Bixio et al., 2002;Camporese et al., 2010)). Ntona et al., 2022). ...