Lewis A. Rossman’s research while affiliated with The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (62)


Figure 1 | Pressure-dependent nodal demand schematization using a virtual pipe and a reservoir (from Todini et al. 2021).
Figure 2 | Dimensionless plot of the inverted FPR used with CEM-2.
Case studies with network sizes and URL
Convergence results for tests run at normal pressure ranges
Comparing alternative PDA solvers with EPANET
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2022

·

548 Reads

·

6 Citations

Journal of Hydroinformatics

·

·

·

[...]

·

L. A. Rossman

This work compares several alternative methods of pressure-driven analysis (PDA) implemented within the code base of the EPANET water distribution system modeling software. The resulting code includes a direct method, the original and a newly modified version of the inverse method currently used by EPANET 2.2, and two recently published methods (the global gradient approach-based PDA and the active set method). The latter four methods solve PDA problems using an inverse flow–pressure relationship, whereas the direct method uses the original relationship. The alternative methods were extensively tested, and their performance was compared over several case study water distribution networks of vastly different sizes and complexities. The results showed that all of the new inverse methods are equally efficient and reliable, whereas the direct method is less reliable by having a higher frequency of failing to converge. HIGHLIGHTS A demand-driven approach and five alternative PDAs were incorporated into EPANET.; The EPANET 2.2 barrier function algorithm was modified to improve convergence, a direct PDA and the inverse global gradient approach-based PDA and ASM approaches were also included.; The code, thoroughly tested on the available water distribution network, cases up to over 150,000 nodes, will be made available for further comparisons.; Results confirm the lack of convergence of the direct approach.;

Download

Pressure Flow–Based Algorithms for Pressure-Driven Analysis of Water Distribution Networks

August 2021

·

562 Reads

·

19 Citations

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management




Figura 3.3 Curva de Rendimiento de una Bomba
Figura 9.1 Resultados de una Consulta sobre el Esquema
Fig 3.1 Componentes físicos de un sistema de distribución de agua
Fig 2.10 Ejemplo de una curva de evolución
EPANET 2.0 en Español. MANUAL DEL USUARIO. Versión 2.00.12. Incluye el Módulo Herramientas

Para descargar el INSTALADOR de la versión 2.00.12 Esp, ir a la pestaña 'Linded data' más abajo......... En la revisión de este Manual de Mayo de 2017, se han actualizado algunas opciones incorporadas en la versión 2.00.12, y se ha añadido un índice lateral para facilitar las consultas. Además se ha extendido el Manual, para incorporar en el apéndice D las instrucciones de manejo del Módulo de Herramientas, junto a algunos ejemplos, el cual es utilizado cada vez más por los programadores que quieren incorporar la potencia de cálculo de EPANET en sus propias aplicaciones, o por los investigadores que lo utilizan para ir más lejos creando nuevas aplicaciones. Dichas instrucciones ya residían en el fichero de Ayuda del Módulo de cálculo, y simplemente se han trasladado a la nueva versión del Manual para facilitar su manejo. Además se han añadido instrucciones concretas para construir los diferentes ejemplos en los distintos entornos de programación, comenzando desde cero.


EPANET 2.0 en Française. MANUEL DE L'UTILISATEUR. Version 2.00.12. Comprend la Boîte à Outils

May 2017

·

5,664 Reads

·

1 Citation

Pour télécharger l'INSTALLATEUR de la version 2.00.12 Fr, allez à l’onglet 'Linked data' ci-dessous ......... Dans la révision de ce manuel, fait en mai 2017, ils ont été mis à jour certaines options ajoutés à la version 2.00.12, et un indice latéral a été ajouté pour faciliter la consultation. Il a également étendu le manuel pour incorporer dans l’appendice D les instructions d'utilisation de la Boîte à Outils avec des exemples, de plus en plus utilisé par les programmeurs qui veulent intégrer la puissance de calcul de EPANET dans leurs propres applications, ou les chercheurs qui l'utilisent pour aller plus loin en créant de nouvelles applications. Ces instructions résidant déjà dans le fichier d'aide du module de calcul, simplement se sont ajoutées vers la nouvelle version du manuel pour faciliter l’utilisation. Nous avons également ajouté des instructions spécifiques pour la construction des différents exemples dans différents environnements de programmation, à partir de zéro.


Around the Water Cooler: Monitoring Drinking Water Systems

June 2013

·

67 Reads

A reliable source of clean, drinkable water is a must for any city or community to survive and prosper. We take for granted the clean, drinkable water delivered from the tap whenever we want to quench that thirst. But few people recognize or understand the complexity of our nation’s water system and what goes into the operations required to deliver this essential human need in an unfailing way, day in and day out. As one of our nation’s critical infrastructures, water distribution systems face security threats ranging from natural disasters, like hurricanes and extreme weather, to intentional acts of sabotage or terrorism. Obviously, it’s important to be able to quickly detect, assess, and respond to any kind of water contamination event no matter the source. But in order to do that, it is essential to have a real-time understanding of what is going on in the water distribution system. This would help water utilities be better prepared to respond to natural disasters or intentional acts of sabotage and could also alert them to other problems like leaks in the distribution system or water quality problems. So how do we get a real-time understanding of water system operations? We integrate a utility’s infrastructure model with their real-time or Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data. We are testing and evaluating our real-time modeling software tools at the Northern Kentucky Water District (NKWD). We are demonstrating how our real-time modeling software tools can be used to provide water utility operators with a better understanding of their water system and its operation. With our software tools, utility operators will have a “flight simulator” type of capability which will allow them to be better prepared to respond to emergencies and plan for the future. To gain this understanding of the water system, we have developed an object-oriented software library called EPANET-RTX (EPANET “Real-Time eXtension”). RTX, for short, joins operational data from an already existing data system with an infrastructure model to improve operations and enhance security in a more sustainable and productive manner. RTX is built on the industry standard for distribution system modeling, EPANET, and leverages years of real-time modeling research and development efforts conducted by EPA. RTX is open source software, and you can find it here. By making it open source, EPA hopes commercial companies will evaluate the technology and use it to develop commercial products. We will continue to develop the RTX libraries which the water community will be able to use to (1) help water utilities field verify (validate) their infrastructure models and (2) develop RTX-based applications. These RTX-based applications will enable water utilities to better manage, operate, and secure their water systems. To learn more about EPA’s research to keep our water systems safe and secure, please visit: epa.gov/nhsrc.


Unified Framework for Deriving Simultaneous Equation Algorithms for Water Distribution Networks

May 2013

·

509 Reads

·

123 Citations

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

The known formulations for steady-state hydraulics within looped water distribution networks are rederived in terms of linear and nonlinear transformations of the original set of partly linear and partly nonlinear equations that express conservation of mass and energy. All of these formulations lead to a system of nonlinear equations that can be linearized as a function of the chosen unknowns using either the Newton-Raphson (NR) or the linear theory (LT) approaches. This produces a number of different algorithms, some of which are already known in the literature, whereas others have been originally developed within this work. For the sake of clarity, all the different algorithms were rederived using the same analytical approach and a unified notation. They were all applied to the same test case network with randomly perturbed demands to compare their convergence characteristics. The results show that all of the linearly transformed formulations have exactly the same convergence rate, whose value depends on whether a NR or LT algorithm was used, and that they converge faster than the nonlinearly transformed formulations do. A number of computational factors suggest that the global algorithm, in either its NR or LT form, is the most attractive of the various formulations to implement. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000703. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.


An overview of EPANET version 3.0

December 2011

·

904 Reads

·

17 Citations

EPANET is a widely used public domain software package for modeling the hydraulic and water quality behavior of water distribution systems over an extended period of time. The last major update to the code was version 2.0 released in 2000 (Rossman, 2000). Since that time there have been many useful advancements made in water distribution system modeling, many of which have been presented at past WDSA symposia. Several of these are being incorporated into an updated version of EPANET. Hydraulic modeling improvements include more efficient sparse matrix solution routines, the modeling of pressure deficient/dependent demands, more versatile options for controlling pump and valve settings, and improved stability for extended period analysis. Water quality enhancements include non-ideal mixing at pipe junctions, longitudinal dispersion within pipes, and more efficient implementation of the constituent transport procedure within pipes. In addition, several options for re-writing EPANET's graphical user interface in a more user accessible language and platform-independent manner are being explored.


A new applications manual for the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)

June 2010

·

8,757 Reads

·

474 Citations

Environmental Modelling & Software

The EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) is a widely used program for simulating urban runoff quantity and quality. Its existing documentation includes a User's Manual that describes how to run the program and a Reference Manual that covers its theory and algorithms. A new manual, the ''SWMM Applications Manual'', has been added to this collection. It contains nine worked-out examples addressing common stormwater management and design problems encountered in practice. The manual will be especially useful for new SWMM users who need additional guidance in applying this powerful tool to urban drainage design and analysis.


Citations (37)


... The EPANET 2.2 model was chosen based on its economy and potential to import the NT from QGIS (Dadebo et al. 2023b). Moreover, the QWater plug-in and EPANET 2.2 solvers employ the robust gradient method (see Eq. (11)) to perform steady-and unsteady-state simulations (Luvizotto et al. 2013;Muranho et al. 2020;Todini and Gabriele 2022;Dadebo et al. 2023b). The ultimate solution is obtained after undertaking successive iterative actions until the convergence tolerance < 0.001 (Fig. 2). ...

Reference:

Application of GIS and Hydraulic Modeling for Sustainable Management of Water Supply Networks: A Pathway for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6
Comparing alternative PDA solvers with EPANET

Journal of Hydroinformatics

... However, the primary focus of this paper is to validate the critical role of hardware devices in solving pipe equation systems, and thus the traditional GGA algorithm, as proposed by Todini and Pilati, which has been employed for solving the equation systems. [31]. The Formulas (1) and (2) are linearized, with their differential forms shown as follows: ...

Pressure Flow–Based Algorithms for Pressure-Driven Analysis of Water Distribution Networks

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

... A methodology structured in well-selected successive stages has been proposed to simplify this step, ensuring sustainable construction and improving decision-making. This methodology is integrated into a system of decision-support tools, including a GIS and a hydraulic simulation model [20]. A technical assessment of pipe performance offers numerous benefits, such as identifying potentially defective or damaged pipes, prioritizing pipes in poor condition, identifying areas for network extension, reducing water losses, and decreasing operating costs by replacing pipes at risk of failure. ...

EPANET 2.0 en Française. MANUEL DE L'UTILISATEUR. Version 2.00.12. Comprend la Boîte à Outils

... La red de tuberías de la zona de estudio fue georreferenciada, incluyendo las tuberías y las válvulas reguladoras de presión y de seccionamiento. Una parte fundamental del proyecto es la modelación matemática para definir el comportamiento hidráulico de la red de distribución de agua potable de la zona de estudio, la cual se realizó con el programa EPANET (Rossman 2002). En este trabajo se describen las actividades realizadas a groso modo, para tener una mejor idea de este proceso, consultar a (Fragoso et al. 2013). ...

EPANET 2.0 en Español. MANUAL DEL USUARIO. Versión 2.00.08

... Higher R 2 (~0.90) values were observed in the data describing performance of the planted HSSF-CW suggesting greater confidence in the application of first-order models to explain contaminant decay in the planted system. By contrast, in the case of unplanted system, variable factors such uptake/release of contaminants by biofilm microflora, biofilm diversity/density might have affected the contaminant decay rate in the system (Jegatheesan et al., 2003;Rossman, 1999). The contaminant decay rate depends on design parameters (HRT, HLR), inflow characteristics, physical chemical and biological processes, and environmental conditions (temperature, rainfall) (Dornelas et al., ...

Modeling Water Quality in Distribution Systems
  • Citing Chapter
  • January 1999

... Before entering the system, water undergoes treatment employing a range of physical, chemical, and biological methods. The prevailing method of disinfection involves the use of chlorine or chlorinebased compounds like chloramine and chloride (Boccelli et al. 1998;Tryby et al. 1999). These are introduced into the water supply to neutralize pathogens. ...

Booster chlorination for managing disinfectant residuals
  • Citing Article
  • January 1999

American Water Works Association

... Several ecohydrological models have been developed to understand and quantify individual or integrated ecohydrological processes in unmanaged to highly managed ecosystems. Semi-distributed hydrologic models, such as the Storm Water 50 Management Model (Rossman, 2010b) and the Soil Water Assessment Tool (Arnold et al., 1998), are widely used in studies of urban and mixed land use watersheds (Jayasooriya & Ng, 2014;Koltsida et al., 2023;Lee et al., 2018;Rossman, 2010a;Samimi et al., 2020). These models simulate water balance based on subcatchment units with similar land cover and soil. ...

Modeling Low Impact Development Alternatives with SWMM
  • Citing Article
  • January 2010

Journal of Water Management Modeling

... Over the years, SWMM has been improved to make it more flexible and easier to use. Chief among these was the rewrite of the code base in the C programming language, the provision of a graphical user interface, and the delivery of the solver as a shared library (i.e., Windows *.dll) with a simple Application Programming Interface (API) (Rossman et al., 2004). The API provides a basic set of functions that allow users to run SWMM simulations. ...

SWMM 5 - the Next Generation of EPA's Storm Water Management Model
  • Citing Article
  • January 2004

Journal of Water Management Modeling

... These findings are consistent with earlier reports in the literature. Vasconcelos et al. found that in the pH range 6.5-8.5, free chlorine, which has the same oxidizing capacity as NH 2 Cl [28], reacted with iron scales faster than did DO [29]. The reaction of NH 2 Cl with ferrous ion can be catalyzed by the presence of Fe(III) solids [30], and can be responsible for the faster decay of NH 2 Cl observed in our studies. ...

Characterizing and Modeling Chlorine Decay in Distribution Systems--A Summary
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • June 1995

... In our case study, the areas with low chlorine content during peak demand hours are centred in the areas with a predominance of cast iron pipes (Fig. 8). Regardless of the oxygen content and pH of the water, according to research by Vasconcelos et al. (1996) and Tonev et al. (2020) in the case of cast iron pipes, a signifi cant portion of the free chlorine is devoured by ferrous ions (Fe 2+ ) in the form of hypochloric acid (HCIO). ...

Characterization and Modeling of Chlorine Decay in Distribution Systems
  • Citing Technical Report
  • January 1996