There is growing evidence of how compassion training enhances psychological and physical well-being (Zessin, Dickhäuser, & Garbade, 2015), however, there are very few studies analyzing the efficacy of Compassion-Based Interventions (CBI) on breast cancer survivors (BCS) (Dodds et al., 2015). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), breast cancer (hereafter referred to as BC) is the most common neoplasm among women and is a major public health problem worldwide (22.7% of all female cancers) (McGuire, 2016; Perou, Sorlie, Eisen, & Van De Rijn, 2000; R. L. Siegel, Miller, & Jemal, 2015; R. L. Siegel, Miller, & Jemal, 2016; Torre et al., 2015). For this and many other reasons, it is important to begin and continue doing research that addresses the after-treatment-breast-cancer-emotional-turmoil with new psychological approaches (Dodds et al., 2015; Thewes et al., 2014).
According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), being a BCS means different things, depending on who experiences it. For some, it means having no signs of cancer after finishing treatment. Survivors may experience a mixture of strong feelings, including joy, concern, relief, guilt, and fear (Mols, Vingerhoets, Coebergh, & Franse, 2005). Others become very anxious about their health and uncertain about coping with everyday life. Some people may even prefer to put the experience behind them and feel that their lives have not changed in a major way (Mayer, 2017).
A vast body of research evaluating the effects of psychosocial interventions on psychological adaptation during cancer treatment has been done (Antoni, 2013; Guo et al., 2013; Stanton, 2006; Stanton, Luecken, MacKinnon, & Thompson, 2013). In a systematic review (Fors et al., 2011), data show that psychoeducational programs, cognitive behavioral therapy and social and emotional support are the most significant therapies for improving mood, quality of life (QoL), and observed fatigue. The impact of psychological interventions on cancer survival is relevant and a growing number of evidence confirms it. In a review of studies, Stanton et al. (2005) found that persistent psychological and physical decrements occur for a subset of cancer survivors.
During the last decade, a growing number of empirical data for new intervention approaches has arisen. There is a call for empirical attention to a broader range and relevant ways to intervene with complementary approaches (Goldstein et al., 2005; Richardson, Sanders, Palmer, Greisinger, & Singletary, 2000). Research is beginning to accumulate valuable data on such interventions for cancer survivors as yoga (Cohen, Warneke, Fouladi, Rodriguez, & Chaoul‐Reich, 2004), massage (Hernandez-Reif et al., 2004) and mindfulness meditation (Carlson, Speca, Patel, & Goodey, 2003).
In oncological settings, Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI) have proved their efficacy in promoting well-being and QoL domains (Sinatra & Black, 2018; Zainal, Booth, & Huppert, 2013). These kind of interventions have shown to be effective in training coping strategies when dealing with psychosocial stress related to the disease, relieving anxiety, stress, fatigue, general mood, sleep disturbance, and improving psychological aspects of QoL (Carlson et al., 2003; Carlson & Garland, 2005). Moreover, data show that MBI can significantly improve psychological domains such as anxiety, depression, and stress in cancer survivors not only after intervention but at long-term (Cramer, Lauche, Paul, & Dobos, 2012; Piet, Wurtzen, & Zachariae, 2012).
The concept of compassion has appeared in psychology in relation to the mindfulness and MBI. In the last two decades, compassion has extended to other domains such as the medical field (Kemper, Larrimore, Dozier, & Woods, 2006; Mascaro et al., 2016; Rousseau, 2004; Strasser et al., 2005; Von Dietze & Orb, 2000), psychotherapy (Gilbert, 2010a; Gilbert & Procter, 2006; Gilbert, 2013), and others (Davidson & Harrington, 2002; Desbordes et al., 2012; Dodds et al., 2015; Mascaro, Rilling, Tenzin Negi, & Raison, 2012; Ozawa-de Silva et al., 2012; Pace et al., 2009; Pace et al., 2012; Reddy et al., 2013; Singer & Bolz, 2013).
Well designed contemplative-based programs have highlighted the benefits of compassion training on physical health, evocation of positive emotions, mental health, social belonging parameters (Grant, 2013; Mascaro, Pace, & Raison, 2013; Neff & Germer, 2013) and on bringing first and third person methods together into the scientific paradigm (Klimecki, Ricard, & Singer, 2013; Kok, 2013). In the last decade CBI have shown to improve psychological functioning and well-being in clinical and educational settings (Kirby, Tellegen, & Steindl, 2015; Kirby, 2017).
As for the empirical framework, we should point out that the main aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT) Program in a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) on a sample of BCS. The specific objectives are aimed to analyze the efficacy of CBCT in variables related to QoL, psychological symptomatology, psychological dimensions linked to fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), self-compassion, compassion and mindfulness trait facets and the influence of CBCT over participants’ compassion and self-compassion semantic construct, when compared to a treatment as usual (TAU) control group. Hypothesis of this study predicts that CBCT group will show improvement in all of the variables showed above. Moreover, participants’ semantic construction, of what is a compassionate and self-compassionate individual, will be modified in the direction of what CBI and compassion-based contemplative traditions propose after going through the CBCT program.
A RCT was designed. Participants (n = 56) were randomly assigned to CBCT (n = 28) or a treatment-as-usual control group (n = 28). Pre-post intervention and 6-month follow-up measures took place to evaluate health-related quality of life; psychological symptomatology; psychological stress, coping strategies, and triggering cognitions for FRC; self-compassion and compassion; mindfulness facet traits; and semantic construction of compassion and self-compassion concepts in both intervention and wait-list groups
CBCT was effective in diminishing stress caused by fear of FCR (F [2, 96.863] = 3.521, p < .05), fostering self-kindness (F [2, 97.453] = 5.769, p < .01) and common humanity (F [2, 98.323] = 6.161, p < .01), and increasing overall self-compassion scores (F [2, 96.277] = 5.423, p < .01), mindful observation (F [2, 96.052] = 4.709, p < .05), and acting with awareness skillsets (F [2, 98.598] = 3.444, p < .05). CBCT also proved to influence participants’ mental construction of what is a self-compassionate and compassionate being.
This research project is another call for deepening scientific knowledge and paying more attention to the mechanisms and implications of training in compassion and exploring the potential of these type of programs for cancer survivorship contexts. In this line of reasoning, a promising potential of compassion programs is the explicit intent to cultivate skills to cope with internal (feelings, thoughts, sensations, memories, self-criticism, etc) and external (lost, sickness, death, criticism) difficulties and turn them into opportunities for growth from the basis of a selflessness perspective (Dambrun & Ricard, 2011; Dambrun et al., 2012). Moreover, more efforts should be focused in dapating compassion training programs to Latin-Mediterranean-Catholic settings.