Occurrence and ClassificationFragments of the Earth's mantle are
frequently transported to the surface via volcanic rocks that are
dominantly alkaline in nature. These fragments range up to sizes in
excess of 1 m across. The term "mantle xenoliths" or "mantle nodules" is
applied to all rock and mineral inclusions of presumed mantle derivation
that are found within host rocks of volcanic origin. The purpose of this
contribution is to review the geochemistry of mantle xenoliths. For
detailed petrological descriptions of individual locations and suites,
together with their geological setting, the reader is referred to the
major reference work by Nixon (1987).Despite peridotite xenoliths in
basalts being recognized for several centuries and comparisons being
made to lherzolite massifs (Lacroix, 1893), it was not until work on
garnet peridotites and diamonds in kimberlites by Fermor (1913) and
Wagner (1914) that such xenoliths were conceptually associated with a
peridotite zone in the Earth beneath the crust, i.e., the zone that we
now identify as the mantle. Mantle xenoliths provide snapshots of the
lithospheric mantle beneath particular regions at the time of their
eruption and hence are crucial direct evidence of the nature of the
mantle beneath regions where no samples have been exposed by tectonic
activity. As such, xenoliths are an essential compliment to tectonically
exposed bodies of mantle (orogenic peridotites and ophiolites) that
occur at plate boundaries (see Chapter 2.04). One obvious contrast
between the mantle samples provided by xenoliths and those provided by
peridotite massifs is the lack of field relationships available for
xenoliths. Other drawbacks include the small size of many xenoliths.
This makes accurate estimation of bulk compositions difficult and
accentuates modal heterogeneities. The frequent infiltration of the host
magma also complicates their chemical signature. Despite these
drawbacks, xenoliths are of immense value, being the only samples of
mantle available beneath many areas. Because they are erupted rapidly,
they freeze in the mineralogical and chemical signatures of their depth
of origin, in contrast to massifs which tend to re-equilibrate
extensively during emplacement into the crust. In addition, many
xenolith suites, particularly those erupted by kimberlites, provide
samples from a considerably greater depth range than massifs. Over 3,500
mantle xenolith localities are currently known. The location and nature
of many of these occurrences are summarized by Nixon (1987). A
historical perspective on their study is given by Nixon (1987) and
Menzies (1990a). Mantle xenoliths from any tectonic setting are most
commonly described from three main igneous/pyroclastic magma types
(where no genetic relationships are implied):(i) Alkalic basalts
sensu-lato (commonly comprising alkali basalt-basanites and more evolved
derivatives), nephelinites and melilitites.(ii) Lamprophyres and related
magmas (e.g., minettes, monchiquites, and alnoites) and lamproites.(iii)
The kimberlite series (Group I and Group II or orangeites; Mitchell,
1995).Although mantle xenoliths most commonly occur in primitive members
of the above alkaline rocks, rare occurrences have been noted in more
evolved magmas such as phonolites and trachytes (e.g., Irving and Price,
1981).To simplify matters and to circumvent the petrographic
complexities of alkaline volcanic rocks in general, we will use the term
"alkalic and potassic mafic magmas" to include alkalic basalts,
nephelinites, melilitites, and lamprophyres. Occurrence of xenoliths in
such magmas can be compared to those occurring in kimberlites and
related rocks. As a general rule, the spectrum of mantle xenoliths at a
given location varies with host rock type. In particular, alkalic and
potassic mafic magmas tend to erupt peridotites belonging predominantly
to the spinel-facies, whereas kimberlites erupt both spinel and
garnet-facies peridotites (Nixon, 1987; Harte and Hawkesworth,
1989).Even within either "group" of volcanic rocks the variety of
possible xenolith types is great. Table 1 presents a summary of the most
common mantle xenolith groups that are found in kimberlitic hosts and
within the alkalic and potassic mafic magmas. The significance and
abundance of these groups will be discussed below. Table 1. Major groups
of mantle xenoliths in kimberlite-related and alkali basalt series
volcanic rocks (after Harte and Hawkesworth, 1989). Textural
classification follows that of Harte (1977). Terminology for
phlogopite-rich mafic mantle xenoliths from Gregoire et al. (2002). For
supplementary data and classifications see Nixon (1987), table 62
TypeCharacteristicsExamplesMg# olivine (A) Cratonic/circum-cratonic
xenoliths erupted by Kimberlite-related volcanics AI: Coarse Mg-rich,
low-T peridotitesOften abundant. Mostly harzburgites and lherzolites
with varying but low modal diopside and garnet. Wide range of
orthopyroxene abundance, Kaapvaal examples notably enriched. Crystals
typically 0.2 mm with equant or tabular shapes, irregular grain
boundaries, rarely granoblastic (Harte, 1977). Bulk compositions
typically highly depleted in Fe, Ca, and Al, enriched in Mg. Mineralogy:
Cr-rich pyrope, Cr-diopside. Orthopyroxene in garnet facies
characterized by >1.0 wt.% Al2O3. Cr-spinel sometimes evident. Minor
phlogopite common grading into type VIII phlogopite peridotites.
Phlogopite often surrounds garnet and is strongly correlated with the
presence of diopside. Estimated equilibration temperatures less than
1,100 °C. Equilibration pressures can vary widely within a pipe and
range from c. 2 GPa to >6 GPa. Rarely diamondiferous (e.g., Dawson
and Smith, 1975), more commonly contain graphite ( Pearson et al.,
1994).N. Lesotho (Nixon and Boyd, 1973a), Kaapvaal craton ( Gurney and
Harte, 1980; Boyd and Nixon, 1978; Boyd and Mertzman, 1987; Nixon,
1987), Siberia ( Sobolev, 1974; Boyd et al., 1993); Jericho Slave craton
( Kopylova et al., 1999)Av 92.8 (91-95) Subcalcic garnet (high
Cr-pyrope; knorringitic) bearing harzburgite varieties scarce but can
contain diamond and graphite. Can be megacrystalline. Textures similar
to type I. Equilibration temperatures and pressures intermediate between
low-T and high-T lherzolites, i.e., 1,150 °C, 5-6 GPa, but vary
widely.Udachnaya, Siberia (Sobolev et al., 1973; Pokhilenko et al.,
1993), Kaapvaal ( Boyd et al., 1993)92-95.5 Spinel facies widespread but
less abundant. Textures as for garnet variety, spinel texture
symplectitic or irregular. Equilibration temperatures <800 °C.
Can also be orthopyroxene enriched, like garnet facies. Spinel
composition can vary widely in Cr# but mostly aluminous. Cr-rich spinels
coexist with garnet. Orthopyroxenes in spinel facies have >1.0 wt.%
Al2O3. Similar range in bulk composition to garnet facies.Kaapvaal
craton (Carswell et al., 1984; Boyd et al., 1999)91.5-94 AII: coarse,
Fe-rich low-T peridotites and pyroxenitesWidespread, normally rare but
locally abundant. Mainly garnet lherzolites and garnet websterites but
also clinopyroxenites and orthopyroxenites ("bronzitites"). Ilmenite can
be present in pyroxenites. Coarse grained to "megacrystalline" (at
Jericho). Textures and equilibration temperatures as for type I.
Sometimes modally layered. Wide ranging bulk and mineral compositions,
with high Fe, Ca, Al, and Na relative to type I. Rare fine-grained
"quench textured" ilmenite/garnet pyroxenites.Matsoku, Kaapval craton
(Gurney et al., 1975); Jericho, Slave craton ( Kopylova et al., 1999);
Mzongwana, SE margin Kaapvaal craton ( Boyd et al., 1984a)83-89 AIII:
dunitesWidespread, locally common. Two varieties: (i) Highly depleted,
coarse to ultracoarse >50 mm olivine (megacrystalline) dunites, often
containing chromite or sub calcic high-Cr pyrope and frequently
diamondiferous. (ii) Often fine to medium grained more Fe-rich dunites,
mineral zoning indicates "metasomatism." Mostly deformed textures.
Orthopyroxene, garnet, phlogopite, diopside, chromite present.Siberia,
notably Udachnaya (Pokhilenko et al., 1993)Kimberley ( Boyd et al.,
1983; Dawson et al., 1981)93-9585-93 AIV: deformed low-T peridotites and
pyroxenitesWidespread, locally common. Porphyroclastic or
mosaic-porphyroclastic textures. Modal abundances, chemical
characteristics and P-T equilibration conditions similar to those of
type I.Jericho, Slave craton (Kopylova et al., 1999)91-95 AV: deformed
high-T peridotitesWidespread but variable abundance in group I
kimberlites, absent/scarce in group II kimberlites. Commonly deformed;
porphyroclastic and mosaic-porphyroclastic textures with fine neoblasts
of olivine. Although generally more depleted than pyrolite, bulk rocks
and minerals generally enriched in Fe and Ti compared to type I (low-T)
and significant compositional overlap of minerals with megacrysts (type
X). Equilibration temperatures 1,100 °C to >1,500 °C,
equilibration pressures generally 4.5 GPa to >6.5 GPa. Garnets and
pyroxenes frequently zoned.N. Lesotho (Nixon and Boyd, 1973a);
Jagersfontein, Kaapvaal craton ( Burgess and Harte, 1999); Siberia (
Sobolev, 1974; Boyd et al., 1993); Slave ( Kopylova et al., 1999);
Somerset Island, Churchill Province ( Schmidberger and Francis,
1999)87-92 AVI: phlogopite-rich mafic mantle xenolithsWidespread and
locally common. Olivine poor/absent rocks. Two main subdivisions of this
group (Gregoire et al., 2002) are: (i) MARID suite
(mica-amphibole-rutile-ilmenite-diopside) with accessory zircon common.
Probable genetic link to group II kimberlites. Medium to coarse grained,
undeformed to deformed, sometimes modal banding. Amphibole always
K-richterite. (ii) PIC suite (phlogopite-ilmenite-clinopyroxene) with
minor rutile. Diopside or Al- and Ti-poor augites. Probable genetic link
to group I kimberlites. K-richterite is absent; grade to glimmerites as
phlogopite mica reaches >90%. Coarse grained, variably
deformed.Kimberley (Dawson and Smith, 1977; Gregoire et al.,
2002)Kimberley ( Gregoire et al., 2002)NANA AVII: pyroxenite sheets rich
in Fe and TiRestricted to Matsoku. Orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene rich
rocks with widely variable olivine and garnet compositions, often with
ilmenite and phlogopite (the IRPS suite: see type VIII). Bulk
compositions Fe and Ti rich. Form magmatic intrusions (<16 cm thick)
into type I rocks which become metasomatized.Matsoku (Gurney et al.,
1975; Harte et al., 1975, 1987) AVIII: modally metasomatized
peridotitesWide spread, variable abundance. Mostly metasomatized
variants of type I. Diverse mineralogies, Two most commonly recognized
groups are phlogopite peridotites (PP) and
phlogopite-K-richterite-Peridotites (PKP) of Erlank et al. (1987). Can
be harzburgite or lherzolite, typically coarse grained, undeformed but
some display porphyroclastic textures. Assemblages vary with location.
Cr-titanate "LIMA" minerals (Lindsleyite-Mathiasite) relatively common
at Bultfontein; edenite-phlogopite association at Jagersfontein;
ilmenite-rutile-phlogopite-sulfide (IRPS) suite at Matsoku associated
with pyroxenitic sheets (type VII). Metasomatic clinopyroxene link to
type AI.Matsoku (Gurney et al., 1975); Kimberley pipes ( Erlank et al.,
1987; Gregoire et al., 2002); Jagersfontein ( Winterburn et al.,
1990)Same as type I, to more Fe-rich. AIX: eclogites, grospydites,
alkremites, and variantsVery widespread, rare to locally abundant.
Eclogites (omphacite and pyrope-almandine garnet). Garnet composition
widely variable, in grospydites garnet has a large grossular component.
At some locations (e.g., Jagersfontein), unusual assemblages of
garnet+spinel (Alkremites), garnet+corundum (Corganites) and
corundum+garnet+spinel (Corgaspinites) occur (Mazzone and Haggerty
1989). Accessory phases in eclogites include kyanite, corundum,
ilmenite, rutile, sanidine, coesite, sulfides, graphite and diamond.
Eclogites classified on texture: group I large subhedral to rounded
garnets in matrix of omphacite. High Cr, Ca, Fe, and Mn in omphacite.
Garnets more Na (avg. 0.1 wt.% Na2O) and Mg rich. Group II have
interlocking texture of anhedral garnet and omphacite and are less
altered. Garnets are lower in Na2O (0.05 wt.%). Common hosts for
diamond, especially group I. Not all eclogites of obvious mantle origin
and some grade into garnet granulites and pyroxenites of crust
origin.Roberts Victor (MacGregor and Carter, 1970; McCandless and
Gurney, 1989); Jagersfontein ( Nixon et al., 1978; Mazonne and Haggerty,
1989); Orapa ( Robinson et al., 1984), all Kaapvaal craton. Udachnaya,
Siberian craton ( Sobolev, 1974; Ponomarenko, 1975); Koidu, W. African
craton ( Tompkins and Haggerty, 1984; Hills and Haggerty, 1989)NA AX:
megacrysts (discrete nodules)Single crystals or monominerallic
polycrystalline aggregates (sometimes exsolved) weighing up to 15 kg.
Rare mutual lamellar or granular intergrowths. Large range in Mg#, Cr,
and Ti in a given suite. Cr-poor variety: widespread, locally abundant
(e.g., Monastery). Garnets, clino- and orthopyroxenes, phlogopite and
ilmenite most common, zircon and olivine rarer. Debatable whether
phlogopite and olivine are members of Cr-poor suite. Wide range in
chemistry but Cr-poor, Fe-Ti-rich relative to type I (low-T) peridotite
minerals. Mineral chemistry and estimated equilibration P/Ts overlap
those of type V (high-T) lherzolites. Some Slave craton "Cr-poor
megacrysts" show mineral chemistry links to type II megacrystalline
pyroxenite xenoliths. See review of Schulze (1987).N. Lesotho (Nixon and
Boyd 1973b); Monastery ( Gurney et al., 1979), Jagersfontein ( Hops et
al., 1992), Kaapvaal craton; The Malaita megacryst suite ( Nixon and
Boyd, 1979), occurs in an ocean plateau alnoite, but has many
similarities with the kimberlitic low-Cr suite Cr-rich variety: (i) A
suite comprising garnet plus ortho- and clinopyroxene, mostly restricted
to kimberlites from Colorado-Wyoming. Mineralogically similar to type I
lherzolites. (ii) "Granny Smith" diopsides; bright green Cr-diopside,
may contain blebs/intergrowths of ilmenite and phlogopite. Can be
polycrystalline.Colorado-Wyoming craton (Eggler et al., 1979)Kimberley
and Jagersfontein ( Boyd et al., 1984b) Miscellaneous: mostly garnets
and pyroxenes with no clear paragenetic association or links to other
megacryst suites. May represent disrupted
peridotites/eclogites/pyroxenites. AXI: polymict aggregatesPolymict
aggregates of peridotite, eclogite and megacrysts, of variable grain
size, some containing quenched melt. Mineral assemblages not in
elemental or isotopic equilibrium.Bultfontein, De Beers and Premier
mines, Kaapvaal (Lawless et al., 1979). MalaitaHighly variable AXII:
diamond and inclusions in diamondsWidespread and closely related to
cratons. Abundance varies from <1 ppm to 100 ppm by weight. Size
<<0.1 g to c. 750 g. Type I diamonds contain abundant N, type II
low N (Harris, 1987).All cratons (Harris, 1987; Meyer, 1987)93-96
Inclusion suites divided into peridotitic (P-type) and eclogitic
(E-type) parageneses. P-type inclusions: high-Cr, low Ca garnet,
Cr-diopside, Fo-rich olivine, orthopyroxene, chromite, wustite, Ni-rich
sulfide, have restricted, high Mg, high Ni chemistry. Equilibration
temperatures 900-1,100 °C. E-Type inclusions: pyrope-almandine, high
Na garnet (>0.1 wt.%), omphacite, coesite, low-Ni sulfide. AXIII:
ultra-deep peridotitesRare and restricted to Jagersfontein (Kaapvaal
Craton) and Koidu (W. African craton). Four-phase garnet lherzolite.
Close association of pyrope-garnet (˜70% py; 2 wt.% Cr2O3) and
jadeite-rich clinopyroxene (20% Jd, & 4% Di). Clinopyroxene forms
either orientated rods in garnet host or as discrete grains attached to
garnet in cuspate contact. Both pyroxenes exsolved from garnet at
100-150 km depth. Recombination of garnet gives original depths of
derivation of 300-400 km. Discrete garnets and "lherzolites" with
eclogitic affinities also found (Sautter et al., 1991).All samples so
far from the Jagersfontein kimberlite, S. Africa (Haggerty and Sautter,
1990; Sautter et al., 1991) and Koidu, Sierra Leone ( Deines and
Haggerty, 2000)91.6 (B): Non-cratonic xenoliths erupted by alkalic and
potassic mafic magmas sensu latoa BI: Cr-diopside lherzolite groupVery
widespread and common in a variety of tectonic settings, off-craton.
Dominantly spinel-facies (Al or Cr-spinel) lherzolites but can be
garnet-facies and garnet-spinel facies (e.g., Vitim). Coarse grained,
commonly little deformed, sometimes show preferred orientation. Include
harzburgites, orthopyroxenites, clinopyroxenites, websterites, and
wehrlites. Pargasite and phlogopite may also be common. Both low TiO2
and high TiO2 amphiboles can occur at the same locality. Accessory
apatite, can be common locally (e.g., Bullenmerri, Victoria).
Interstitial silicate glass can be present. Garnet and spinel facies
significantly more olivine-rich and orthopyroxene poor than peridotites
from cratons such as Kaapvaal and Siberia. Bulk rocks less depleted in
Ca, Al, Fe, and lower in Mg than cratonic peridotites. Minerals
generally higher Mg# and Cr# and lower Na and Ti than those of the
Al-Augite group. Can be subdivided into type IA (LREE depleted
clinopyroxene) and type IB (LREE enriched clinopyroxene).Victoria, SE
Australia (Frey and Green, 1974); Vitim ( Ionov et al., 1993a); San
Carlos and other W. USA localities ( Frey and Prinz, 1978; Wilshire and
Shervais, 1975); Eifel ( Stosch and Seck, 1980); Hawaii ( Jackson and
Wright, 1970); Scotland ( Menzies and Halliday, 1988)Garnet facies:
Thumb, Navajo field ( Ehrenberg, 1982a, b); Pali-Aike, Patagonia ( Stern
et al., 1989); Vitim, S. Siberia ( Ionov, 1993a, b)>0.85, Avg.
˜90 BII: Al-augite wehrlite-pyroxenite groupWidespread and common.
Frequently clinopyroxene-rich rocks but widely variable: wehrlites,
clinopyroxenites, dunites, websterites, lherzolites, lherzites, gabbros.
Al-spinel is the typical aluminous phase but may contain plagioclase.
Kaersutite common along with apatite, Fe-Ti oxides, and phlogopite. Some
igneous and metamorphic textures. Composite xenoliths relatively common
(in contrast to kimberlite-related xenoliths). Cross-cutting
pyroxene-rich veins and layers may occur in olivine-rich hosts.
Olivine-rich aggregates also found in pyroxene-rich xenoliths. Minerals
generally lower Mg# and Cr#, higher Ti than those of the type I
(Cr-diopside group).Victoria, SE Australia (Frey and Green, 1974); San
Carlos and other W. USA localities ( Frey and Prinz, 1978; Wilshire and
Shervais, 1975; Irving, 1980); Hawaii ( Jackson and Wright, 1970;
Irving, 1980)<0.85 BIII: garnet pyroxenite groupWidespread but not
abundant. Garnet clinopyroxenites and websterites plus clinopyroxenites
and websterites where pyroxenes commonly show exsolution of garnet
and/or spinel as well as Ca-rich or Ca-poor pyroxene. Accessory ilmenite
and sometimes apatite. Coarse grained, undeformed textures, sometimes
layered. "Basaltic" bulk compositions.Delegate, SE Australia (Lovering
and White, 1969; Irving, 1974), Salt Lake Crater, Hawaii ( Beeson and
Jackson, 1970)NA BIV: modal metasomatic groupWidespread varieties of the
above groups showing evidence for modal (or "patent") metasomatism.
Wehrlite-clinopyroxenites with mica, glimmerites. Typical metasomatic
phases include pargasite/kaersutite, phlogopite, apatite, and
grain-boundary oxides e.g., rutile. Apatite only in some cases. Silicate
glass as melting product of amphibole, clinopyroxene, or phlogopite
common. Composite xenoliths occur.Nunivak, Alaska (Francis, 1976), SE
Australia ( O'Reilly et al., 1991), Menzies and Murthy, 1980a, Vitim (
Ionov et al., 1993a), Loch Roag and Fife Scotland ( Menzies et al.,
1989)NA BV: megacrystsWidespread with variable abundance. Usually large
(>1 cm) single crystals. Large range in Mg#, Cr, and Ti in a given
suite.SE Australia (Binns et al., 1970; Irving and Frey, 1984; Schulze,
1987), Loch Roag, Scotland ( Menzies et al., 1989)NA Group A: Al-augite,
Al-bronzite, olivine, kaersutite, pyrope, pleonaste, plagioclase; some
of which may have crystallized from the host magma Group B:
Anorthoclase, Ti-mica, Fe-Na salite, apatite, magnetite, ilmenite,
zircon, rutile, sphene, and corundum, all of which are likely
xenocrysts. Some coarse crystals are undoubtedly derived from
disaggregated type I and type II xenoliths. a Based on Harte and
Hawkesworth (1989) with nomenclature from Frey and Green (1974),
Wilshire and Shervais (1975), Frey and Prinz (1978), Irving (1980), and
Menzies (1983). Although widespread in the literature, classification of
xenoliths on the basis of their host magma is not fully informative. It
is more geologically useful to subdivide xenoliths in terms of their
tectonic setting. A basic subdivision of xenolith occurrences is between
those erupted in oceanic settings and those erupted in continental
settings. The continental occurrences far outnumber the oceanic
occurrences. The continental occurrences can be further subdivided
depending on age of the crust and the tectonic history of the area being
sampled. Xenoliths from stable cratonic and circum-cratonic regions are
distinctly different in petrology from those occurring in areas that
have experienced significant lithospheric rifting, generally in
noncratonic crust, in the recent geological past. As such, we will
utilize the terms cratonic/circum-cratonic to refer to xenoliths
occurring on and around craton margins and the term noncratonic in
referring to mantle sampled away from cratons, often in areas that have
experienced recent lithospheric thinning. There is a link back to the
host rock in that, as a general rule, cratonic and circum-cratonic
xenoliths are erupted by kimberlites and noncratonic xenoliths are
erupted by alkalic and potassic mafic magmas.2.05.1.1.1. Mantle
xenoliths in continental volcanic rocksXenoliths found in Archean
cratonic regions are characterized by the lithological types reported in
Table 1(a). Garnet-facies peridotites dominate the peridotite xenolith
inventory in these locations. In contrast, away from cratons, there is a
scarcity of garnet-facies peridotites ( Table 1(b)). In addition,
cratonic xenolith suites contain samples derived from depths ranging
from crustal levels to >200 km, whereas noncratonic xensoliths come
from less than 140 km deep. There can be distinct differences between
xenoliths erupted on craton and those erupted in stable areas of
Proterozoic crust marginal to cratons. For instance, subcalcic-garnet
harzburgites occur on most cratons but do not occur in circum-cratonic
suites ( Boyd et al., 1993). In addition, the maximum depths of
equilibration of circum-cratonic peridotite suites are less than for
cratonic peridotite suites (e.g., Finnerty and Boyd, 1987). These
differences warrant the distinction between "cratonic" and
"circum-cratonic" xenoliths. In addition, young rift-related magmatism,
marginal to cratons, samples very thin lithosphere compared to cratonic
and circum-cratonic lithosphere. The xenoliths sampled in this
environment fall into the loose category of "noncratonic" xenoliths. A
more detailed and complex tectonic classification is provided by Griffin
et al. (1999a).2.05.1.1.2. Mantle xenoliths in oceanic volcanic rocksThe
nature of the suboceanic mantle is largely constrained from geochemical
studies of its partial melts (see Chapter 2.08) because occurrences of
mantle xenoliths in the ocean basins are much rarer than on the
continents. The host rocks for these xenoliths are exclusively alkalic
and potassic mafic magmas. The xenolith suite of the Hawaiian volcanic
chain is perhaps the best characterized (Jackson and Wright, 1970) of
the ocean islands, while extensive suites have also been found in the
Canary Islands ( Neumann et al., 1995), Samoa ( Hauri et al., 1993),
Grande Comore ( Coltorti et al., 1999), and Tahiti. Most of these
occurrences sample the oceanic lithosphere directly below the islands
and those of type I ( Table 1) are proposed to be residues of partial
melting that have been variably metasomatized, with carbonatite-like
fluids frequently being invoked ( Hauri et al., 1993; Coltorti et al.,
1999). The Hawaiian suite is more complex. Pyroxenites of type II and
type III are common and iron-rich peridotites, some with garnet, are
thought to be physical mixtures of spinel lherzolites with the
pyroxenite suite ( Sen and Leeman, 1991).Some xenolith localities sample
the mantle lithosphere beneath oceanic plateaux. The most extensive and
varied xenolith suite in this regard is that from Malaita (Solomon
Islands) on the margin of the Ontong Java Plateau (Nixon and Boyd,
1979). This locality is hosted by an alnoite and contains both garnet
and spinel-facies lherzolites together with a spectacular megacryst
suite. Although in an oceanic setting, the variety of the xenolith suite
provided by the Malaita alnoite, in particular the megacrysts, show
strong similarities to suites from kimberlites ( Nixon and Boyd,
1979).2.05.1.1.3. Mantle xenoliths in subduction zone
environmentsAlthough xenoliths from subduction-related tectonic settings
have been known for sometime, their detailed relationship to the
subduction zone system has been a matter of debate. Most samples are
type-I spinel lherzolites and modal metasomatic variants of type IV,
most commonly kaersutite and phlogopite. Among the best-known examples
are from Itinome-Gata, Japan (Aoki, 1968) and Simcoe, NW, USA ( Brandon
et al., 1999), although spinel lherzolites from Grenada, Lesser
Antilles, also occur. It is not well established whether these xenoliths
actually represent parts of the metasomatized mantle wedge above the
subduction zone, or simply mantle lithosphere not intimately related to
the subduction zone process. McInnes and Cameron (1994) have reported
xenoliths from the Tabar-Lihir-Tanga-Feni arc, Papua New Guinea, that
are purported to be mantle wedge compositions.