Background. Neck pain can have an insidious [mechanical] or traumatic onset. Mechanical neck pain is de ined as pain in the cervical spine and shoulder area with symptoms of neck position, movements or contact with cervical muscles. Aim. is to compare the effect of ischaemic compression (IC) and myo icial release of the trapezius muscle in patients with mechanical neck pain. Materials and methods. A two-week randomized experimental study. Thirty female patients who had mechanical neck pain, aged from 18 to 55 years old, were randomized into 2 equal groups. Group A received myofascial release technique plus cryotherapy for two weeks, 3 sessions per week., while Group B received ischemic compression plus cryotherapy for two weeks, 3 sessions per week. All participants in both groups were evaluated before and after training for Visual Analog scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI) and cervical range of motion by Universal Goniometer. Results. There was a signi icant decrease in VAS and NDI post treatment in the group A and B compared with that pretreatment (p > 0.05). There was a signi icant increase in neck ROM post treatment in the group B and A compared with that pretreatment (p > 0.001). Comparison between the group A and B post treatment revealed a signi icant decrease in VAS and NDI of the group B compared with that of the group A (p > 0.05). Also, there was a signi icant increase in lexion, extension , side bending, and rotation of the group B compared with that of the group A (p > 0.001). Conclusions. It was concluded that application of ischemic compression 3 times / weeks for 2 weeks is an effective short-term method to reduce pain, increasing cervical ROM, and functional abilities of patients with mechanical neck pain. Streszczenie Informacje wprowadzające. Ból szyi mozė mieć przyczyny mechaniczne lub traumatyczne. Ból mechaniczny szyi de iniuje się jako ból w odcinku szyjnym kręgosłupa i okolicy barku z objawami dotyczącymi ułozėnia szyi, ruchów lub kontaktu z mięsńiami szyjnymi. Cel. Porównanie wpływu ucisku niedokrwiennego (IC) i mięsńiowo-powięziowego rozluzńienia mięsńia czworobocznego u pacjentów z mechanicznym bólem szyi. Materiały i metody. Dwutygodniowe randomizowane badanie eksperymentalne. Trzydziesći pacjentek z mechanicznym bólem szyi w wieku od 18 do 55 lat zostało losowo przydzielonych do 2 równych grup. Grupa A była poddawana terapii techniką rozluzńiania mięsńiowo-powięziowego oraz krioterapii przez dwa tygodnie, 3 sesje w tygodniu, natomiast grupa B była poddawana kompresji niedokrwiennej oraz krioterapii przez dwa tygodnie, 3 sesje w tygodniu. Wszystkie uczestniczki w obu grupach były oceniane przed i po treningu pod kątem wizualnej skali analogowej (VAS), wskazńika niepełnosprawnosći szyi (NDI) i zakresu ruchu kręgosłupa szyjnego za pomocą uniwersalnego goniometru. Wyniki: Po leczeniu w grupie A i B w porównaniu ze stanem przed leczeniem wystąpił istotny spadek wartosći VAS i NDI (p > 0,05). Wystąpił istotny wzrost zakresu ruchu szyi po leczeniu w grupach B i A w porównaniu z tym przed leczeniem (p > 0,001). Porównanie grup A i B po leczeniu wykazało istotny spadek VAS i NDI w grupie B w porównaniu z grupą A (p > 0,05). Zaobserwowano również znaczny wzrost zgięcia, wyprostu, zgięcia bocznego i rotacji w grupie B w porównaniu z grupą A (p > 0,001). Wnioski. Stwierdzono, zė zastosowanie ucisku niedokrwiennego 3 razy/tydzień przez 2 tygodnie jest skuteczną krótkoterminową metodą zmniejszenia bólu, zwiększenia zakresu ruchu szyi i zdolnosći funkcjonalnych pacjentów z mechanicznym bólem szyi. Słowa kluczowe kompresja niedokrwienna, mechaniczny ból szyi, mięsńiowo-powięziowy punkt spustowy Technika kompresji niedokrwiennej kontra rozluźnienie mięśniowopowięziowe górnego mięśnia czworobocznego w mechanicznym bólu szyi u kobiet z Uniwersytetu Jouf 157 nr 3/2021 (21) www.fizjoterapiapolska.pl Introduction There may be an insidious [mechanical] or painful onset of neck pain. Mechanical neck pain is characterized as pain with symptoms of neck position, movements, or contact with cervi-cal muscles in the cervical spine and shoulder region [1]. In the general population, the incidence of mechanical neck pain is 4554 percent, and in terms of lifestyle, up to 30 percent of men and 50 percent of women suffer from neck pain. Increased rates among office staff, users of computers and women. The prevalence of neck pain in women is higher than in men. [2] Prevalence of neck pain has been estimated to be between 13.4 and 22.2 percent. The risk of neck pain becomes chronic causing neck pain expensive in terms of absenteeism and health care costs [3]. Neck pain is characterized by referred pain , reduced mobility of the joint range and a twitch response due to mechanical deformation of the facial and muscular areas known as myofascial trigger points [MTPts]. Myofascial pain syndromes result from a high percentage of muscular pain. Myofascial trigger point is intense skeletal muscle tension that is associated with hypersensitive palpable nodules in a taut muscle band [4]. Micro trauma, macro trauma, overuse, physical stress and emotional stress are some of the factors affecting myofascial trigger points. The pathophysiology of its origin is not clear and recent research indicates that injured/overused muscle fibers have fewer oxygen and nutrients, leading to spontaneous muscle contractions [5]. In a recent narrative study of physiotherapeutic treatment for myofascial trigger points, it was concluded that the most used shortterm pain management methods were release of trigger point pressure, ischemic compression [6]. A manual therapy procedure, ischemic compression acts on the same concept of applying sustained pressure to the trigger point and relieving muscle stress, compression is applied pro gressively with the finger, thumb, elbow relative to how much the patient can bear and sustained for up to 90 seconds [7]. Myofascial release is a commonly used direct manual medicine procedure that uses specifically directed mechanical forces to manipulate different somatic dysfunctions and minimize myofascial restrictions. Myofascial release is effective in providing immediate pain relief when used with other traditional therapies to alleviate tissue tenderness [8, 9]. Additional clinical effects after treatment include edema and inflammation attenuation, analgesic usage reduction, enhanced posttrauma muscle recovery and increased range of motion in affected joints [10, 11]. This study is therefore designed to assess which technique is more effective ischemic compression or myofascial release in reducing pain, improve ROM and functional abilities of the patients.