ArticlePDF Available

An Insider's Experiences with Environmental Entrepreneurship

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Most entrepreneurial principles apply to environmental ventures as well.Ecopreneurship (i.e., environmental entrepreneurship) is outlined from a practical and an academic perspective, based on previous research.Environmental businesses are classified in four categories:nature-oriented enterprises, producers of environmental technology, providers of environmental management services, and producers of environmentally friendly products. Each classification is discussed in terms of the drivers (geographical influences, reason for market emergence, degree of enforcement) that influence their existence.Three major barriers to ecopreneurship--the challenge of market creation, financing barriers, and ethics-based decision making--are described, and implications are discussed.A typology of ecopreneurs is created based on a desire to change the world and a desire to make money.Concluding remarks provide an overview of these drivers and barriers and explain how they contribute to the market-creation difficulties experienced by environmental businesses as compared to non-environmental businesses. (AKP)
Content may be subject to copyright.
GMI 38 Summer 2002 71
An Insider’s Experiences with
Environmental Entrepreneurship
Lassi Linnanen
Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
The author argues that most of the normal entrepreneurial laws are valid also for
environmental ventures. However, the value-based leadership often rightly associ-
ated with environmental entrepreneurs gives a special flavour to these businesses.
With hands-on practical experience and an insightful theoretical orientation, the
author analyses typical environmental business features and its main segments and
presents a typology of ecopreneurs.
Entrepreneurship
Ecopreneurship
Start-up
companies
Finland
Lassi Linnanen is professor of environmental and quality management in the
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management at Helsinki
University of Technology. Before joining academia in 2000 he was chief
executive officer and co-founder of Gaia Group Ltd, a leading Finnish energy
and environmental management consultancy. His main research interests
include corporate responsibility strategies and system innovations for
sustainable development.
u
Department of Industrial
Engineering and Management,
Helsinki University of Technology,
Saimaankatu 11, 15140 Lahti,
Finland
!
lassi.linnanen@hut.fi
<
www.tuta.hut.fi
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 71
© 2002 Greenleaf Publishing http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com
s environmental entrepreneurship something different from ordinary
entrepreneurship? The right answer might be both no and yes. Most of the normal
entrepreneurial laws, such as the correlation between risk and profit, the right timing
for market entry and the need for adequate financial and human capital are valid also
in environmental ventures. To be successful, environmental entrepreneurs should
move fast, motivate others and take risks as well as anticipate and supply what large
numbers of people want. However, the values-based leadership often rightly associated
with environmental entrepreneurs gives a special flavour to these businesses.
In this paper, the phenomenon of ecopreneurship is examined from two different
sides. The practical side is that I have over ten years of personal experience in the creation
and management of environmentally oriented business ventures in Finland. This
experience is drawn on to provide many of the hands-on observations cited in the paper.
The second side is academic: I also hold a professorship in environmental and quality
management at Helsinki University of Technology and continue to support and advise
young academic entrepreneurs. All the recent start-ups with which I have been involved
also have something in common: a quest for more sustainable products and services.
Owing to the sensitive nature and confidentiality of the information behind the real-
life examples, most of the companies and individuals referred to in this paper will
remain anonymous.
Ecobusiness classification
Environmental businesses can be classified into four different segments. Each has a
distinctive character, and their emergence has been influenced by a different combi-
nation of drivers. Three main drivers for environmental business and technology can
be identified as follows:
t The geographical area of influence, ranging from local, to regional, to global. The
balance has shifted from local point-source pollution, such as waste-water treat-
ment, to global and more complex issues, such as climate change.
t Reason for market emergence, either by regulation or by voluntary decisions of
market actors. Besides the traditional command-and-control approach, market-
based instruments and voluntary actions have become increasingly important.
t Degree of enforcement, varying from high to low. The degree of enforcement differs
from country to country and from one law to another.
Thus, I am inclined to propose, on the premises of these drivers, that at least the
following four segments can be identified among environmental businesses:
t Nature-oriented enterprises. These are concerned with wildlife habitat preservation,
eco-tourism and other close-to-nature concepts that utilise economic and human
resources to improve the state of the environment.
t Producers of environmental technology. The production of such technology is
driven by legislative pressure on communities or industrial enterprises to reduce
their environmental load on water, air and soil.
t Providers of environmental management services. These aim to advise corporations
to utilise environmental excellence as a source of competitive edge.
lassi linnanen
72 GMI 38 Summer 2002
I
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 72
t Producers of environmentally friendly products. Such products are differentiated
from existing products by their better environmental performance over the product
life-cycle.
Table 1 summarises the drivers of these four environmental business segments.
Nature-oriented enterprises
The purest segment of environmental entrepreneurs might consist of those trying to
make their living through sustainable use of natural resources. Businesses in this
segment are often run by individuals with alternative lifestyles, or by otherwise dedicated
people to serve good causes. They offer voluntary and local means to practise environ-
mental resource management.
Producers of environmental technology
Public perception of environmental business is often limited to environmental technol-
ogy, an industry segment that is usually compliance-driven. The tightening of national
legislation is the most important driver of these firms. However, the importance of
market-based growth drivers is becoming more and more evident in environmental
technology businesses. The tightening of international regulation may result in less
binding agreements than seen in nationally enforced laws, but it will force global
businesses to react more quickly and voluntarily.
A typical eco-business situation with respect to environmental technology is to
overestimate the legislative push and to underestimate the market pull, as Case study 1
illustrates.
Providers of environmental management services
Environmental management services achieve their aim by taking into account environ-
mental protection criteria in all the company’s planning, implementation and control
activities, aiming at decreasing the environmental load and achieving long-term corpo-
rate objectives (Linnanen 1998). This industry segment includes but is not limited to
environmental management system consulting, environmental accounting and com-
GMI 38 Summer 2002 73
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Driver
Segment
geographical
influence
reason for market
emergence
degree of
enforcement
Table 1 drivers of eco-business sectors
Nature-oriented
enterprises
Local Market Low
Environmental
technology
Local or regional Regulation High
Environmental
management services
Global Regulation and
market
Low
Environmental
products
Global Market Low
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 73
munication, legal services and life-cycle assessments (LCAs). More recently, environ-
mental management has expanded to cover the triple-bottom-line approach.
Producers of environmentally friendly products
Environmentally friendly products have markets as their driver. The demand for these
products is derived from the increasing environmental awareness of consumers. These
consumers constitute 10%–20% of all consumers in Western societies and have the
willingness to pay an environmental premium in the purchasing price (Peattie 1993).
In addition to environmental criteria, this differentiation can be achieved by social
criteria, such as the sale of fair-trade products.
Barriers to ecopreneurship
It appears that there are a few critical issues that successful ecopreneurs must address
and that conventional entrepreneurs do not. These can be classified into three broad
categories: (1) the challenge of market creation, (2) the finance barrier and (3) the ethical
justification for existence.
The challenge of market creation
The diffusion of environmental awareness is an important factor in supporting market
creation for environmental technology, products and services. The diffusion of environ-
mental awareness and, even more so, a change in consumer behaviour have proved to
be slow (Meffert and Kirchgeorg 1993). One potential explanation for this slowness lies
in the complicated nature of the sustainability challenge. Environmental management
and sustainable development are still fairly discredited concepts in public discourse and
it is therefore a natural inclination to require greater proof of these new and provocative
ideas than for the view already believed to be true (Sutton and Staw 1995).
One problem in communicating environmental problems is the difficulty in provid-
ing clear cause-and-effect relations. Consider the following imaginary example with
regard to carbon dioxide emissions:
When you drive a car to a local hypermarket you will add to global carbon dioxide
emissions, which contribute to global warming, which in turn might lead to food scarcity
lassi linnanen
74 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Case study 1 legislative push and market pull: tyre recycling
in the mid-1990s a start-up company planned to enter the market to
recycle rubber from waste tyres. At that time, a car-tyre recycling scheme was established in
Finland as a result of legislative measures. The company quite rightly assumed that there would
be an important and cheap material flow resulting from approximately three million waste tyres
per year. It prepared a production and investment plan for rubber sheets based on its patented
technology and on the expected price of the raw material. However, it failed to recognise the
fact that the remanufactured products, like all other products, do not automatically have
commercial value. There needs to be a market for them. After a more careful market study it
was revealed that the intended production capacity was approximately 100 times higher than
the existing market demand. Even with an annual growth rate of 100% in demand it would have
taken almost ten years to run the plant at full capacity. The investment would clearly have been
a failure, and the investment plan was cancelled.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 74
as the conditions in many productive agricultural areas will decline and, therefore, your
food price rises in the long term. And, of course, you should calculate the fuel cost, which
has a direct impact on the price of your food.
When you hear the argumentation above for the first time, would you buy the idea and
reduce your driving in order to keep your food prices down? Considering the plausibility
of the causal relations, probably not. Luhmann (1988) argues that it is not possible for
a society to respond even to grave environmental problems until they become public by
means of the social communication system. Environmental threats become social
threats through communication. This socialisation of threats is also a prerequisite for
their elimination.
A newly established company always faces a major challenge: the good business idea
needs to be realised in practice. Market creation requires strong belief in the entrepre-
neur’s own vision and capabilities. The need to create a new market for new products
often proves difficult, as Case study 2 demonstrates.
When the market creation challenge is combined with high-level capital investments
to enable industrial-scale production, small companies often end up facing substantial
financial barriers to launching themselves and to growth (see Case study 3).
The finance barrier
On the one hand, environmental entrepreneurs with drive and ideas often find it difficult
to find investors who share their objectives and ideals. On the other hand, people
interested in direct investment in environmental businesses experience difficulties in
finding the enterprises they can believe in and support. Many environmental companies
GMI 38 Summer 2002 75
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Case study 2 the timing of market entry: future trade in fresh water
a profound example of the challenges of timing one’s market entry
can be drawn from the fresh water trade. By logical deduction, this seems to be set to become
a huge market in the future. All the predictions argue that water availability is the world’s most
pressing resource issue, as fresh water is growing scarce amid competing human needs (e.g.
Doering et al. 2002). The demand is expected to rise, making margins higher, which, at a certain
threshold level, will make bulk shipments of fresh water profitable on a global scale. However,
it is next to impossible to predict when this threshold level will be achieved.
Case study 3 the challenge of market creation and high start-up costs: nanotechnology
nanotechnology is argued to be a potential future market for
supporting sustainable development. Staff at a technology centre developed a number of
nanotechnology innovations relating to the surface treatment of materials (atomic layer
epitaxy). The methods provide significant eco-efficiency potential in several areas of application
(e.g. through extension of product life). The business potential was recognised, resulting in a
spin-off company from an existing corporation. However, this company had hard times during
its first years of existence. The capital investments required were high, and there was no existing
market. Finally, a couple of industrial companies that were potential users of this new surface
technology in their products decided to acquire minority stakes in the company. This simul-
taneously gave the company a more solid financial ground and created a market channel.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 75
seem to know little about the investment community, and many investors believe that
ecopreneurs lack knowledge about the realities of financial markets and fail to grasp the
investor’s interests. Whether these prejudices are justified or not, they create an obstacle
to placing and obtaining capital (
IISD 2002).
Many ecopreneurs express the need for a period of product development to reach a
market breakthrough that is longer than the period sought by typical venture capitalists,
who may seek to exit their investment after two to three years. This may be not enough
for eco-innovations to become commercially viable. As a result, environmental venture
capital is marginal. Randjelovic et al. (2002) have estimated the size of green venture
capital to be around 0.1% of mainstream venture capital. One venture capital executive
put it quite bluntly:
The environment may be a successful screening criterion to find possible growth
companies, but after that it does not influence [investment] decision making. The
problems and solutions are found from three areas: management, management and
management.
In the my experience, it is difficult to sell investors a novel business concept containing
positive environmental arguments. Stubbornness is needed to beat the resistance to
change (see Case study 4).
Case study 4 indicates an important trend. An emergent channel for ecopreneurs to
raise venture capital is the stock of high net worth investors (‘business angels’) who seek
sustainability-related investment because of their environmental and social beliefs and
the understanding of the potential double dividends (Randjelovic et al. 2002).
The ethical raison d’être
Financial and market considerations are essential to all entrepreneurs. Therefore,
maybe the most distinctive feature of many eco-businesses is their explicitly expressed
ethical reasoning. This has positive and negative effects on the business and its corporate
governance. The ethical dimension is a major issue to take into account when main-
streaming environmental businesses and innovations.
lassi linnanen
76 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Case study 4 overcoming resistance to change: the re-using of textbooks
a recent start-up company aimed to replace the distribution chain of
the high-school textbook market by re-using books. The business was especially interesting
because of the high profit margins and its effectiveness in reaching the customer with accurate
provision of books. The company’s core success factor is an information system that is
designed to gather the data as to where, when, what and how many books can be acquired and
are needed for the lessons for the next term. According to this information, the correct items
are taken to schools and the trading is organised through bookstore-like trading events. The
customer benefit is a significantly lower price combined with a better service. However, the
raising of finance for the company proved to be a difficult task as there was no prior example
of this earning logic. This raised doubts among venture capitalists. After several unsuccessful
approaches, a group of private investors were able to provide the needed 4 0.5 million finance
for the company to roll out the business to cover Finland.
Now, the concept has good prospects for future expansion both abroad and into other
products with similar features. An international survey made by the company has shown that
the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain and many other countries are possible markets, where
the opportunities to leverage know-how and information systems are frequent.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 76
On the positive side, most of the ecopreneurs I have met are highly committed to
their business. Their reason for running an enterprise is not solely to make money but
involves also a willingness to make the world a better place in which to live. This personal
commitment also increases their marketing credibility and trustworthiness as business
partners.
Another issue is that sometimes this willingness to serve good purposes even exceeds
the desire to make money. Eco-businesses are indeed measured by multi-dimensional
success criteria, many of them being non-financial. The combination of fact-based and
value-based issues linked with various impact levels—from the individual level up to a
global level—leaves room for great diversity of performance indicators and makes it
difficult to define success. Integration of the financial and the ecological perspectives
has proved to be difficult, if not impossible. The current lack of clarity of sustainability
criteria leads use to the conclusion that ‘good business’ is continuously open to multiple
interpretations.
It is also possible to identify negative issues relating to an ethical raison d’être. First,
a quest for ethical excellence complicates management. For example, recruitment and
outplacement decisions are never easy, but they might be even more difficult in values-
led enterprises. In these enterprises, people coming in should naturally be talented and
productive but they must also show an ability to commit themselves to the world-
improving value base. Then, if the company faces a need to reduce its workforce, firing
people will be difficult, as there will be a tendency to take into account a wider variety
of factors than would be the case if the decision were based solely on rational reasoning.
Second, many of those companies with a high ethical profile seem to resemble non-
profit associations more than business organisations in their governance and decision-
making. A somewhat surprising link can be found between established family
enterprises and environmental enterprises. Mustakallio (2002) identifies family busi-
ness characteristics to have (1) a low mobility of shares and controlled ownership and
(2) an emotional dimension, with mixed self-interested and altruistic behaviours. Most
of ecopreneurs share these two characteristics.
The link between financial-sector values and ecopreneurial values deserves special
mention. It is sometimes unclear whether the entry of venture capitalists into eco-
businesses is solely a positive phenomenon. Too often, blind money-making intentions
overrule the ethical orientation that is one of the positive features of many ecopreneurs
(see Case study 5).
GMI 38 Summer 2002 77
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Case study 5 venture capitalism and ecopreneurs: the small print that
compromised the ethical vision of the founders of an
environmental management software company
a provider of environmental management software applications
offers holistic solutions to its customers’ environmental management challenges by using web-
based technology, automating basic routines encountered in environmental management, such
as data collection. The business concept of this company is a lucrative mix of environmental
management and information technology, and the company’s initial start-up finance was easily
raised. Unfortunately, it soon transpired that the investor selected was interested only in the
human capital of the young entrepreneurs, not in developing the company itself. Soon after the
start-up stage, the investor announced a plan to employ these entrepreneurs directly. The
company may still prove to be a market and financial success, but it will happen at a high ethical
price. In this case, the young enterprise and its founders being forced to abandon their original
vision and values by strict contractual policy and by overuse of negotiation power was an
unwanted side-effect imported from the financial community.
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 77
Developing a typology of environmental entrepreneurs
Several definitions of ecopreneurship can be found in the literature. Some of them have
a rather limited scope. For example, Anderson and Leal (1997: 3) define ecopreneurship
as ‘entrepreneurs using business tools to preserve open space, develop wildlife habitat,
save endangered species and generally improve environmental quality’. Schuyler (1998)
provides a more generic definition by stating that ‘the term ecopreneurs has been coined
for entrepreneurs whose business efforts are not only driven by profit, but also by a
concern for the environment’.
Taking into account the considerations outlined in the above discussion, ecopreneurs
can be classified according to two criteria: (1) their desire to change the world and to
improve the quality of the environment and life, and (2) their desire to make money and
grow as a business venture. These two dimensions seem to be independent. The first
dimension of pursuing the ‘good life’, like sustainability, is an acceptable goal as such
but it is primarily an inefficient business concept. It is often argued in management
practice that the more focused the business idea, the better it is in terms of commercial suc-
cess. The second dimension emerges from a reasonable assumption that economic
success factors are no different in ecobusinesses than they are in any other business.
Successful ecopreneurs are expected to move fast, takes risks with prospective gains,
motivate others and to anticipate and supply what large numbers of people want.
A typology of environmental entrepreneurs is shown in Table 2. The elements of this
typology are analysed in the following sections.
Self-employer
An important factor among ecopreneurs who do not prosper financially is an unwilling-
ness to grow. Many of these companies have been born as an alternative to the dream
of continuous growth usually found in ‘normal’ business enterprises. Among this type
of ecopreneurs there is often a low desire to proceed along the same path and ‘to repeat
the same mistakes the capitalist system always does when assuming an infinite and
ever-growing system’. It is self-evident that substantial growth will not take place without
entrepreneurial drive. It should also be borne in mind that the majority of small-scale
entrepreneurs are self-employers. They are satisfied with a level of cash flow that is
sufficient to guarantee a reasonable living standard. Out of the four eco-business
segments presented earlier, ecopreneurs who advocate nature-oriented business ideas
are most likely to belong to this category.
Non-profit business
Among this type of ecopreneur, the distinction between business and non-profit
organisational roles is often unclear. They usually have a strong commitment to change
lassi linnanen
78 GMI 38 Summer 2002
Desire to make money
low high
Table 2 drivers of eco-business sectors
high
Non-profit business Successful idealist
low
Self-employer Opportunist
Desire to change
the world
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 78
existing business and consumer behaviour. However, good citizenship often overtakes
the quest for high-performance financial results. In other words, these people often have
a high willingness to influence society but a low willingness to grow. A typical example
of such an enterprise is a sustainability think-tank; these tend to remain as fairly small
expert organisations but which have an influence much bigger than their size.
Opportunist
Opportunists are rather recent entrants among ecopreneurs. They typically have a
professional background in traditional industries or they are ‘ordinary’ entrepreneurs
expanding into ecobusiness in order to increase their profits. Driven by pure economic
considerations, their business ideas are not linked to changes in the entrepreneur’s
value base. Opportunists tend to be involved in environmental technology, which
provides the most direct promise for economies of scale.
Successful idealist
Taking the growth leap needs an internal ambition, and sometimes ecopreneurs suc-
ceed. The successful ecopreneur builds a dynamic equilibrium between two virtues:
making money and making the world better. These ecopreneurs could be labelled as
successful idealists. Their desire to improve the world leads to motivation to create
markets. The cycle is enforced by positive feedback from customers and other stake-
holders, providing additional momentum for positive business results and further
strengthening the entrepreneurial motivation. This virtuous cycle is illustrated in Figure 1.
Conclusions and discussion
Environmental entrepreneurs share many features with other entrepreneurs. Similar
to mainstream businesses, the ecopreneurial success cycle is quite unstable and can
easily shift to be a vicious cycle. The less successful cycle does not emerge or collapse
as a result of good intentions but because of failure in the market test. Consequently,
this decreases motivation, paralyses further development of competence and impairs
the ability to serve markets. However, a few differences can be seen between ecopreneurs
and other entrepreneurs. Market creation is even more difficult for environmental
business ideas than it is for non-environmental business ideas, because the financial
community may not yet be mature enough to finance environmental innovations, and
GMI 38 Summer 2002 79
an insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship
Desire to improve
the world
Positive feedback
from stakeholders
Motivation to create
markets
Business growth
Figure 1 the virtuous cycle of ecopreneurship
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 79
the role of ethical reasoning creates confusion within the mainstream business commu-
nity.
Perhaps the most distinctive feature of many ecobusinesses is their explicitly expressed
ethical reasoning. Being highly ethical brings with it certain difficulties in today’s
business culture, which is dominated by a mistaken assumption that most decisions are
value-free. Luckily, these attitudes are gradually softening as socially responsible
investments and other value-driven commercial successes demonstrate the win–win
option. Hall (2001: 19) describes a responsible entrepreneur in the following terms:
The popular thinking was that to succeed one must be tough, selfish and ready to do
whatever it takes to beat the other side...to the contrary, many entrepreneurs who are
nice, decent people build better relationships and, in turn, accomplish great things for
that very reason.
There is also one other factor that helps partially explain why the creation of
environmentally driven markets is difficult. The barrier arises from the inherently
different logic between academia and the business community. Companies and their
managers often expect some kind of prescriptive recommendations to be drawn from
research. Entrepreneurs tend to look for specific examples of successful management
and an inventory of success stories as well as suitable tools for use when one aspires to
success. In contrast, academic researchers and policy-makers are more interested in
consistent and systematic data on environmental performance and in the drivers of
change. What appears as an interesting success story of environmental management
for a businessperson might only ‘add yet another case study to the literature’ in the eyes
of an academic. Such an imbalance of expectations does not make the complex issue
any easier and needs to be addressed.
References
Anderson, T.L., and D.R. Leal (1997) Enviro-capitalists: Doing Good while Doing Well (Lanham,
MD:
Rowman & Littlefield).
Doering, D.S., A. Cassara, C. Layke, J. Ranganathan, C. Revenga, D. Tunstall and W. Vanasselt (2002)
Tomorrow’s Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business (Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute).
Hall, G. (2001) The Responsible Entrepreneur (Franklin Lakes, NJ
: Career Press).
IISD
(International Institute for Sustainable Development) (2002) ‘Perception Barriers’, www.bsdglobal.
com/markets/rm_barriers.asp, accessed 31 August 2002.
Linnanen, L. (1998) Essays on Environmental Value Chain Management: The Challenge of Sustainable
Development (Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, 46; Jyväskylä, Finland:
University of Jyväskylä).
Luhmann, N. (1988) Ecological Communication (Cambridge,
UK: Polity Press).
Meffert, H., and M. Kirchgeorg (1993) Marktorientiertes Umweltmanagement: Grundlagen und Fallstudien
(Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel).
Mustakallio, M.A. (2002) Contractual and Relational Governance in Family Firms: Effects on Strategic
Decision-making Quality and Firm Performance (doctoral dissertation, Institute of Strategy and
International Business, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland).
Peattie, K. (1993) Green Marketing (London: Pitman).
Randjelovic, J., A.R. O’Rourke and R. Orsato (2002) ‘The Emergence of Green Venture Capital’, paper
presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 23–26 June 2002.
Schuyler, G. (1998) ‘Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship’, CELCEE
Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest
98.8, www.celcee.edu/publications/digest/Dig98-8.html, accessed 3 March 2003.
Sutton, R., and B. Staw (1995) ‘What Theory is Not’, Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1995:
371-84.
q
lassi linnanen
80 GMI 38 Summer 2002
gmi38.linnanen 2/4/03 11:56 am Page 80
... Another area of the literature is concerned with studying the typologies of sustainable entrepreneurship. The main factors considered in this literature are the motivation of the entrepreneur (economic or environmental values) as well as the main orientation of the entrepreneur (Linnanen, 2002;Schaltegger, 2002;Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011); however, the eco-innovation aspect is marginal. ...
... However, few studies have investigated eco-innovation in the entrepreneurial context, and fewer still in the specific context of start-ups. Some researchers have indeed attempted to shed light on environmental practices in the specific context of new businesses, and many of them have focused on the environmental practices of the sustainable entrepreneurs (Linnanen, 2002;Muñoz and Dimov, 2015;Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011); yet despite these contributions, research on eco-innovation in the specific entrepreneurial context of green start-ups remains scarce. Several authors have pointed out the scarcity of investigations related to ecoinnovation within green start-ups and have pointed to the need to study the eco-innovative start-ups in more depth (Colombelli and Quatraro, 2018;Corradini, 2019;Fichter et al., 2022;Horbach, 2020). ...
... Thus, the main factors discussed under this heading are related to the individual entrepreneur. The importance of the sustainability intention and orientation of the entrepreneur is highlighted in many articles (Linnanen, 2002;Schaltegger, 2002;Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011). Linnanen (2002) shows that green entrepreneurs have several characteristics in common with traditional entrepreneurs; the main difference is the important role of ethical values. ...
Article
Jel classification: L26 M13 Q55 Keywords: Eco-innovation Start-ups typology Data analysis methods Internal and external drivers A B S T R A C T The purpose of this paper is to identify the drivers of eco-innovation in start-ups. Firstly, a discriminant analysis (DA) is applied to study what is distinctive about eco-innovative start-ups as compared to non-eco-innovative start-ups. Secondly, a typology of eco-innovative start-ups is developed using a hierarchical ascendant clustering (HAC). Analyses are carried out using original data from a survey of 120 eco-innovative and non-eco-innovative French start-ups. Discriminant analyses reveal that the founders of eco-innovative start-ups are differentiated by characteristics related to their environmental education and professional experience. Furthermore, eco-innovative start-ups are distinguished from the non-eco-innovative start-ups by voluntary environmental practices, such as the adoption of corporate social responsibility policies. Finally, we show that there is a diversity of profiles of eco-innovators. In fact, firms cluster into five main profiles and exhibit different eco-innovation drivers. We highlight that the different types of eco-innovators do not face the same difficulties in accessing funds. These findings have important implications for the implementation of public policy designed to promote eco-innovative activity, and they highlight the need to design policies that take into account the distinctive character of each profile.
... Note: we have not changed the wording in any of our direct quotes. entrepreneurship studies are available that are now more than 20 years old (Isaak, 1998;Linnanen, 2002), with authors justifying their sustainability research work in terms of its ability to derive more precise research questions or practical implications (Lepoutre et al., 2013;Walley & Taylor, 2002). While some point at developing suitable management strategies for certain types of enterprises, others stress that a typology helps introduce, explain, and support sustainability entrepreneurship (Isaak, 1998;Schaltegger, 2002). ...
... Most of the current work however concentrates on only one field of sustainability entrepreneurship. Numerous papers only focus on those generating environmental impacts, i.e. green entrepreneurship or ecopreneurship (Linnanen, 2002;Nikolaou et al., 2018;Schaltegger, 2002), while others focus on social entrepreneurs (Hein, 2022;Lepoutre et al., 2013;Lubberink et al., 2018). Few studies to date appear to understand sustainability entrepreneurship more broadly as an umbrella term to include green and social aspects, or a combination of them (Olteanu & Fichter, 2022). ...
... Few studies to date appear to understand sustainability entrepreneurship more broadly as an umbrella term to include green and social aspects, or a combination of them (Olteanu & Fichter, 2022). In addition, some studies focus on non-profit organizations (Zahra et al., 2009) or exclusively on profit orientation (Walley & Taylor, 2002), while others also include different levels of profit generation or hybrids (Linnanen, 2002;Schaltegger, 2002). We furthermore identified several articles on typologies in the field of sustainability entrepreneurship discussing its respective organizational level(s) such as sustainable start-ups and incumbents (e.g. ...
Article
Full-text available
Entrepreneurial activity counts as specifically important for targeting today’s and future’s urgent societal challenges. It needs certain kinds of entrepreneurs to find innovative solutions to reach sustainable transformation. There is only little research pointing on those entrepreneurs with a social and/or ecological mission – especially when it comes to sustainability-oriented entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. Our research contributes to closing this gap by analyzing the lives of sustainability entrepreneurs with a specific focus on personal factors and turning points that influence the identification of windows of opportunity and the decision to take them. We conducted in-depth narrative interviews with 22 sustainability entrepreneurs and carve out suggestions for future research. There is no homogeneous group of sustainability entrepreneurs. We underline the diversity of sustainability entrepreneurs and introduce various factors for successful agents of transformation.
... By combining personal motivations and the external context Walley and Taylor (2002) highlight a typology of four green entrepreneurs: innovative opportunists, visionary champions, ethical mavericks, and environmental entrepreneurs. Linnanen (2005) classifies ecopreneurs as self-employed, engaged in a non-profit business, opportunists, and successful idealists. Many works (Linnanen, 2005;Santini, 2017;Schaltegger, 2002) explore the differences between environmental and traditional entrepreneurship. ...
... Linnanen (2005) classifies ecopreneurs as self-employed, engaged in a non-profit business, opportunists, and successful idealists. Many works (Linnanen, 2005;Santini, 2017;Schaltegger, 2002) explore the differences between environmental and traditional entrepreneurship. They find similar traits associated with traditional entrepreneurship and ecopreneurship, such as the central role of financial and human capital, the relation between risk and profit, and the challenges associated with time to market. ...
... Table 1 summarizes the main features of social, environmental, and sustainable entrepreneurs identified in the literature according to the dimensions of the project and the individual features of the entrepreneur. (Hockerts, 2017) -Cognitive and effective processes: compassion, aspiration, sympathy, empathy, moral obligation, self-efficacy, perceived support (Grimes et al., 2013;Lewis, 2019;Mair, Noboa, 2006;Miller et al., 2012;Ruskin et al., 2016;Yitshaki et al., 2022;Yitshaki, Kropp, 2016) -Gender (Hechavarría et al., 2017) -Past distressing experiences: unemployment, rural poverty, limited education opportunities (Yiu et al., 2014) Environmental entrepreneurs X X -Less materialistic and oriented to the maximization of profits than a traditional entrepreneur (Phillips, 2005) -Integration of sustainability in the set of cultural values (Santini, 2017) -Self-employed (Linnanen, 2005) ...
Article
Full-text available
This article aims to identify the characteristics of business, social, environmental, or sustainable entrepreneurial projects led by student entrepreneurs. We analyze the specificities of the projects based on a business and/or social and/or environmental orientation, regarding the profile of student entrepreneurs and the features of their projects. We use a unique database of 210 responses of student entrepreneurs involved in the French entrepreneurial program PEPITE between 2014 and 2021. We propose a typology of student entrepreneurs that highlights the specific features of business, social, environmental, and sustainable student entrepreneurs. We show that the individual determinants of sustainable and environmental entrepreneurial projects are quite close, those of social projects are very specific, while sustainable projects are not associated with specific projects or individual profiles. We formulate managerial recommendations to improve the contribution of universities to the emergence of sustainable innovation in society through entrepreneurship education programs.
... Individuals are encouraged to have environmental awareness and entrepreneurs to be ecopreneurs. Ecopreneurs aim a development that will gain them an advantage over their rivals and increase their earnings and profitability by protecting the natural environment (Schaltegger, 2002;Schaper, 2002;Linnanen, 2002). ...
... The most important feature that distinguishes ecopreneurs from other entrepreneurs is that they focus on environmental innovations and spend most of their energy to be environmentally friendly and useful. Ecopreneurs also aim a development that will gain them an advantage over their rivals and increase their earnings and profitability by protecting the natural environment (Schaltegger, 2002;Schaper, 2002;Linnanen, 2002). Pachaly (2012) found in his study that public support is one of the most crucial incentive factors in the exhibition of ecopreneurship. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study is to reveal the relationships between ecopreneurship and innovative behavior in university students and to reveal their view of ethnocentrism. For this purpose, using the scales for ecopreneurship, innovative behavior, and ethnocentrism in the literature, a research survey was created and applied to 913 higher education students of three Turkey's foundation university who voluntarily agreed to fill the questionnaire with the convenience sampling method. The survey data gathered were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22, and research hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the ecopreneurship variable played a full mediator role in the effect of ethnocentrism on innovative behavior. It was also identified that ethnocentrism had an adverse effect on the innovative behavior of the individual and their ability to have ecopreneurship skills; furthermore, ecopreneurship skills were found to increase the level of innovative behavior exhibited by the individual. It has been observed that individuals with the perception of ethnocentrism, who are closed to thoughts, ideas, cooperation and interaction outside their own cultural environment, do not have the ecoentrepreneurship ability that requires being open to differences. Additionally, it has been determined that ecoentrepreneurship skills increase the individual's level of innovative behavior. According to the results of the research, if the individual has eco-entrepreneurship ability, all the negativities brought by ethnocentrism will disappear. By providing university students with the necessary training to gain ecopreneurship skills as well as with guidance, encouragement and motivation to this end. In this way, the effect of ethnocentrism will be eliminated, and students will be more creative and innovative. In the literature review, no previous studies on the research topic were found. Therefore, the study is original and fills an important gap in the literature. Structured Abstract: Purpose and Conceptual Framework: The aim of this study is to reveal the relationships between ecopreneurship and innovative behavior in university students and their view of ethnocentrism. Individuals are encouraged to have environmental awareness and entrepreneurs to be ecopreneurs. Ecopreneurs aim a development that will gain them an advantage over their rivals and increase their earnings and profitability by protecting the natural environment (Schaltegger, 2002; Schaper, 2002; Linnanen, 2002). Innovative behavior is defined as the production of new ideas and processes and the realization of the ideas generated (Janssen, 2004, p. 202). Innovative behavior enables the creation of new and useful ideas, processes, and products in enterprises (Mura et al., 2012). Individuals with innovative behaviors make a difference in their work compared to others and deliver more productive jobs. According to Neuliep and Mccroskey (1997, p. 385) ethnocentrism is putting the values brought by the individual's own culture at the center of everything and classifying other cultures by seeing them beneath their own culture. Therefore, it is evident that ethnocentrism, which gives the individual a high sense of belonging to their own culture or race and causes them to deem it superior to other cultures and races (Shimp and Sharma, 1987, p. 280), is an undesirable outcome for both individuals and societies. Therefore, elimination of the adverse conditions that this negative situation will bring is desired for both businesses and individuals. Methodology/ Approach: This study's main body is composed of 3543 students studying in different programs at vocational schools of three foundation universities in Istanbul. The opinions of 913 of these students who voluntarily accepted to fill in face-to-face questionnaires were evaluated. The survey form statements were mostly chosen among the statements used in previous studies and showed high reliability and validity. Today, university students are expected to be individuals that have good relations with their environment, engage highly in entrepreneurial activities, quickly integrate into the globalizing world, and are open to the external environment. Increasing the welfare and the level of the country to the highest point will be possible with these students' innovative behaviors and entrepreneurship activities. Therefore, it is of great importance for university students to have entrepreneurial skills or to develop innovative ideas or projects. In this context, it is very important to determine what kind of entrepreneurial ability students have or to what extent their entrepreneurial level affects their innovative business behaviors. It is also important to identify the level of ethnocentrism in university students, which is known as placing one's own culture over all other cultures. Based on these views, it was deemed appropriate to conduct this study on university students. The statements in the scale were graded between "strongly disagree" and "absolutely agree" on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Survey data in the study were collected in December 2019. Therefore, ethics were not included in the establishment. The survey data gathered were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 22.0, and research hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling. Üstün (2011) conducted the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale created by Neuliep and McCroskey (1997) to measure the Ethnocentrism scale in 2011. The one-dimensional 6-item scale created by Kuckertz and Wagner (2010) has been adopted to measure the ecopreneurship scale. In Karaca (2015), study the scale was translated from its original English language format into Turkish. A one-dimensional 6-item scale developed by Scott and Bruce (1994) was used to measure individuals' innovative behavior scale. In Tunca (2018), study the scale was translated from its original English language format into Turkish. Findings As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the ecopreneurship variable played a full mediator role in the effect of ethnocentrism on innovative behavior. It was also identified that ethnocentrism had an adverse effect on the innovative behavior of the individual and their ability to have ecopreneurship skills; furthermore, ecopreneurship skills were found to increase the level of innovative behavior exhibited by the individual. By providing university students with the necessary training to gain ecopreneurship skills as well as with guidance, encouragement, and motivation to this end, the effect of ethnocentrism will be eliminated, and individuals will be more creative and innovative. This paper fills a significant void in the literature since no previous studies have been conducted on the relevant subject. The Mediating Role of Ecopreneurship on The Relation Between Innovative… 625 www.turkishstudies.net/economy Discussion This study concludes that individuals with an ethnocentrism culture, who cannot interact, cooperate, or establish friendships with individuals from different cultures, do not exhibit innovative behaviors. Another finding, individuals with a sense of ethnocentrism, closed to all thoughts, ideas, cooperation, and interaction outside their own cultural environment do not have ecopreneurship skills, which is a type of entrepreneurship that requires a broad vision and openness to differences. In addition, it was determined in the research that there is a positive relationship between ethnocentrism and innovative behavior, and the ecopreneurship variable plays a full mediation role in this relationship. The more entrepreneurial and innovative university students constituting the sample of the research are expected to be, the further they are expected to be from ethnic conservatism.
... Previous research has used different terms to describe entrepreneurs and their respective start-ups which strive for the creation of financial as well as social and/or environmental impact. In the sustainable entrepreneurship context, and its related subareas of social entrepreneurship and environmental entrepreneurship, the key terms used include "sustainable entrepreneurs" [6], "green start-ups" [7], "environmental entrepreneurs" [8], "eco-preneurs" [9] and "social entrepreneurs" [10,11]. Hybrid organizations research subsumes these terms under the umbrella term of "hybrid businesses" including "businesses and entrepreneurs that pursue social and/or ecological goals while being guided by a distinct business mindset and some form of commercial orientation" ( [12], p. 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this article is to advance the sustainable entrepreneurship research context by establishing an in-depth understanding of the aspired successes and related sustainability results of hybrid and non-hybrid start-ups against the background of a multi-level perspective. The insights are generated through an explorative multiple-case-study approach including twelve German start-up companies both hybrid start-ups and non-hybrid start-ups. There is limited research that conceptualizes aspired successes applying a multi-level view to the firm level of start-ups. This article provides comprehensive insights into different success and result categories of sustainable entrepreneurship and provides both future research as well as practitioners with a clear directive of how to navigate in the hybrid start-up context. Finally, the discussed differences and similarities between hybrid start-ups and non-hybrid start-ups draw a clearer though differentiated line between these two archetypes of start-ups.
... First, when interpreting the findings, the advanced age of the GEM data must be considered, as the entrepreneurial environment has changed significantly since 2009. Green start-ups face additional financial, administrative, market, and legal barriers which might limit their abilities to innovate and grow (Linnanen, 2002;Melay et al., 2017). However, the financial and entrepreneurial support infrastructure for green start-ups has considerably improved over the past decade (Bocken, 2015;Fichter et al., 2016;Lin, 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper merges the literature on green and high-quality entrepreneurship by introducing environmental orientation as an unrecognised characteristic of start-up quality and the three quality dimensions innovativeness, growth orientation, and international orientation. Entrepreneurship literature argues that only high-quality start-ups contribute to sustainable development and that a better understanding of what determines the quality of start-ups is required. Empirical research has recently shown that the environmental orientation of start-ups is one such determinant, as it significantly predicts their innovativeness. This paper pursues this novel research avenue on the importance of environmental orientation for start-up quality in two ways. First, this paper evaluates and extends this initial evidence on environmental orientation and innovativeness by examining a three times larger sample, covering additional countries and entrepreneurial stages. Second, this paper also analyses the impact of environmental orientation on the quality dimensions of growth orientation and international orientation. Investigation using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data on 9650 entrepreneurs from 51 countries revealed that start-ups with a higher environmental orientation are of superior quality regarding their innovativeness, growth expectations, and exports. These results remain robust for start-ups at different entrepreneurial stages, and tests employing different methodological approaches and variable definitions. However, the categorisation into factor-driven, efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven countries showed that greener start-ups are more innovative in countries at all three levels of development, while the relationships with growth orientation and international orientation remained significant for only two of the three categories. The findings of this paper provide a new approach for practitioners to identify the small number of high-quality start-ups and an economic reason warranting intensified efforts to support green start-ups.
Article
Full-text available
Zusammenfassung Der Beitrag trägt zur Debatte über die Bearbeitung von ökologischen Herausforderungen im Gegenwartskapitalismus bei, indem er das Konzept des „grünen Geistes des Kapitalismus“ empirisch begründet weiterentwickelt. Anknüpfend an die Arbeiten von Sombart, Weber und Boltanski/Chiapello untersucht er anhand von neun qualitativen Fallstudien die Konstitution des kapitalistischen Geistes bei ‚grünen‘ Unternehmer:innen. Dabei zeigt sich, auf welche Weise sich in der Geisteshaltung der Befragten ökologische und kapitalistische Sinngehalte miteinander verbinden und wie sie mögliche Widersprüchlichkeiten bearbeiten. Zwar lassen sich in den untersuchten Fällen situative Brüche mit kapitalistischen Prinzipien beobachten, diese führen jedoch nicht zu einer substanziellen Überwindung kapitalistischer Grundprinzipien wie Gewinnstreben oder Wettbewerbsorientierung. Als Grund identifizieren wir spezifische Deutungsmuster, die die Wirtschaftsgesinnung der Befragten im Fall von Konflikten zwischen ökologischen und ökonomischen Zielsetzungen stabilisieren.
Article
Günümüzde ekolojik (doğal) kaynakların, beşeri ihtiyaçlar için kontrolsüzce tüketilmesi çevresel yıkımları da beraberinde getirmiştir. Yeşil ekonomi, çevresel yıkımlardan doğan maliyetleri göz önünde bulunduracak yeni bir modeli önerisi olarak sunulmuştur. Bu noktada ekogirişimler ise, yeşil ekonomiye doğru dönüşümün kilit aktörü olarak görülmektedirler. Ekogirişimcilik kavramı ilk kez 1990’lı yıllarda ortaya çıkarak, araştırmacılara, işletmelerin ekonomik ve çevresel hedeflerini aynı anda değerlendirme imkanı doğmuştur. Ancak 2000'li yıllara gelindiğinde, ilgili yazın oldukça karmaşık hale gelmeye başlamıştır. Çünkü girişimcilik üzerine çalışan araştırmacılar, ilgilerini daha çok ekogirişimcilik tanımı geliştirmeye ve ekogirişimciliği motive edici faktörleri keşfetmeye yöneltmişlerdir. Bu noktada karmaşıklığı azaltmak amacıyla, ekogirişimcilik tipoloji çalışmalarına ihtiyaç duyulmaya başlanmıştır. Ekogirişimcilik tipoloji çalışmalarının birçoğu, teorik ve kavramsal açıdan faydalı olmalarına rağmen, görgül kanıttan yoksun ve statiktir. Bu duruma bağlı olarak, araştırma, işletmelerin ekolojik (doğal) çevreye ilişkin amaçlarının önceliği ile izledikleri stratejilerine bağlı olarak bir ekogirişimcilik tipolojisi geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, İzmir ilinde faaliyet gösteren yeşil yıldız sertifika sahibi 10 otel işletmesiyle yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşme yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında, 10 ekogirişim, geliştirilen tipoloji üzerinde konumlandırılmıştır.
Article
Innovative financing mechanisms are needed to facilitate sustainable development. In the past few years, socially responsible investments have emerged as a successful type of financing scheme but many eco-oriented start-up companies remain under-funded. Apparently, environmental innovations have only recently caught the attention of an important financial sector: venture capital (VC). The article describes the emerging phenomenon of environment-related VC (or green VC) and provides an overview of the current market for this type of investment. The paper delves into this industry, revealing its characteristics, processes and mechanisms. The study also uncovers the main problems faced by eco-entrepreneurs as well as venture capitalists interested in this type of venture. Finally, it analyses the drivers for green VC and attempts to identify the sources of innovation and the uniqueness of these emerging financial products. Based on the analysis, the paper also derives a definition of green VC. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Article
There is growing concern with how science and modern society can cope with major problems, especially those of an ecological kind. This has grown in parallel with a skepticism which questions our processes of rational decision making, questions our ability to plan, and questions our cognitive capacity for prediction and directing action. Faced with these problems, the scientific establishment demands more investment to increase levels of knowledge. It maintains that we can change and master the environment. But the way forward is to recognize the increasing uncertainties we face. Some theoretical development is possible in this area owing to the study of risk, but this needs generalizing to the level of society. An attempt is made in the final section to assimilate this particular theoretical approach with ideas in evolutionary theory.
Article
Thesis (doctoral)--University of Jyväskylä, 1998. Includes bibliographical references.
Tomorrow's Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business
  • D S Doering
  • A Cassara
  • C Layke
  • J Ranganathan
  • C Revenga
  • D Tunstall
  • W Vanasselt
Doering, D.S., A. Cassara, C. Layke, J. Ranganathan, C. Revenga, D. Tunstall and W. Vanasselt (2002) Tomorrow's Markets: Global Trends and their Implications for Business (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute).
The Responsible Entrepreneur
  • G Hall
Hall, G. (2001) The Responsible Entrepreneur (Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press).
Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship', CELCEE Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest 98
  • G Schuyler
Schuyler, G. (1998) 'Merging Economic and Environmental Concerns through Ecopreneurship', CELCEE Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearinghouse on Entrepreneurship Education Digest 98.8, www.celcee.edu/publications/digest/Dig98-8.html, accessed 3 March 2003.
The Emergence of Green Venture Capital', paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference
  • J Randjelovic
  • A R O 'rourke
  • R Orsato
Randjelovic, J., A.R. O'Rourke and R. Orsato (2002) 'The Emergence of Green Venture Capital', paper presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden, 23–26 June 2002.