Due to climatic changes, the increasing import of dogs from abroad as well as increasing
tourism and freight traffic within Europe and consequently the increased spreading of possible vectors, vector-borne infections are growing in importance among dogs in Germany. In the countries of the Mediterranean region as well as in southeastern Europe, pathogens such as Leishmania infantum, Hepatozoon canis, Ehlichia canis, Anaplasma platys and Dirofilaria spp. are endemic. Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia spp. also occur in central and western Europe. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of infection in dogs from Berlin/Brandenburg after being imported from endemic regions and after traveling to endemic regions. Sixteen countries in the Mediterranean region and southeastern Europe were defined as endemic.
The study included 345 dogs imported to Germany from endemic regions and presented at the Small Animal Clinic of Freie Universität Berlin between 2007 and 2015. It also included 303 dogs from Germany that had travelled to endemic regions and were presented between 2007 and 2018. In the case of dogs accompanying their owners on travels, 1174 test procedures were evaluated, divided into 525 direct and 449 indirect methods of detection; for the imported dogs, 1368 tests were evaluated, divided into 576 direct and 792 indirect Methods of detection.
More than one tenth of the dogs (40/303 dogs, 13%) that had travelled to endemic countries were tested positive for at least one vector-borne infection. In dogs imported to Germany from endemic countries, more than one third (122/345 dogs, 35%) had at least one vector-borne infection. The dogs imported to Germany from endemic countries were most frequently tested positive for Leishmania infantum (66/314 dogs tested for the pathogen, 21%), Ehrlichia canis (45/278, 16%) and Babesia spp. (25/251, 10%). For those dogs that had travelled to endemic countries, the tests were mainly positive for Ehrlichia canis (18/231, 8%), Leishmania infantum (14/260, 5%) and Babesia spp. (14/260, 5%). Infections with more than one pathogen, which can complicate diagnosis and cause more severe clinical symptoms, were found in 1% (4/303 dogs) of dogs that had travelled as companion dogs and in 8% (27/345 dogs) of the imported dogs. Most dogs were imported to Germany from Spain (186/345 dogs), Greece (48/345), Hungary (19/345) and Italy (19/345). Dogs tested positive for at least one vector-borne infection were mainly from Portugal (6/12 dogs, 50%), Greece (22/48, 46%) and Spain (67/186, 36%). Only countries from which at least 10 dogs were imported to Germany were considered for the omparison. The most popular travel destinations were Italy (90/303 dogs), France (53/303) and Spain (49/303). Fifty-seven of 129 dogs had travelled to two or three countries. Positive test results for vector-borne infections were most frequently found in dogs travelling to Croatia (3/15 dogs, 20%), Italy (13/90, 14%) and Spain (6/49, 12%). Only countries that at least 10 dogs had travelled to were considered for the comparison.
Due to climatic changes, the increasing import of dogs from abroad as well as increasing
tourism and freight traffic within Europe and consequently the increased spreading of possible vectors, it is necessary to protect all dogs in Germany from infections by means of ectoparasite prophylaxis, preferably with substances that have a repelling effect. Furthermore, it would be desirable to introduce official monitoring of dogs accompanying travels to endemic countries as well as registration of dogs imported from abroad, in combination with the education of owners by authorities and/or veterinarians in Germany, in order to reduce further spreading of infections and possible vectors. Vector-borne infections are important not only for veterinary medicine, but also for human medicine and public health because of the zoonotic potential of some infectious agents. Test procedures for vector-borne infections should be applied in a targeted and considered manner. This includes considering the time and location of the stay abroad and/or import, the clinical and clinicopathological findings of affected dogs and possible financial limitations of the owners.