ArticleLiterature Review

The 2014 Garrod Lecture: EUCAST - are we heading towards international agreement?

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with phenotypic methods is based on the measurement of the MIC (mg/L) and breakpoints to categorize bacteria and fungi as susceptible, intermediate or resistant. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires an agreement on breakpoints and a rigorous standardization of methods and materials. Requirements for defining breakpoints include a definition of doses and dose intervals, information on MIC distributions for the target organisms, definitions of the highest MIC for organisms devoid of phenotypically expressed resistance (the epidemiological cut-off) and information on resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcome in trials. In 2001, the breakpoint committees of France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK were tasked with developing European breakpoints under the umbrella of EUCAST, organized by ESCMID and later also by ECDC. Breakpoints for previously established antibacterial and antifungal agents in Europe have now been harmonized. With the EMA, EUCAST has since 2006 determined breakpoints for new agents. All breakpoints are freely available on the EUCAST web site; these are used in semi-automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices and have been employed since 2010 in a EUCAST disc diffusion method. They have been or are now being implemented in most countries inside Europe and many countries outside it. Everything needed to perform and interpret antimicrobial susceptibility testing is freely available from the EUCAST web site, as are aggregated MIC distributions based on more than 26 000 distributions. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... For most antimicrobials with proven clinical efficacy at a specific dose, only the phenotypically wild-type ( pWT) population of the bacterium in question is considered treatable (figure 1a) [17]. Thus, the main aim of the two systematic reviews commissioned by WHO was to evaluate the available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data to assess whether existing CCs corresponded to epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs), which represent the upper end of the pWT MIC distribution (figure 1a) [10,13]. ...
... Notably, the upper end of the pWT distribution, which corresponds to the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF), does not automatically become a clinical breakpoint (CB), as shown in panel (b). Instead, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and clinical data must be analysed to assess whether any of the represented populations are susceptible (S), susceptible at increased exposure (I), or resistant (R) [17,24]. This may demonstrate that an agent offers no clinical benefits even for pWT strains at clinically attainable drug exposures, in which case the species in question would be deemed to be intrinsically resistant (case A). ...
... More fundamentally, MIC, PK/PD and clinical data should be fully integrated when setting breakpoints [11,17]. In 2018, WHO endorsed a second breakpoint for moxifloxacin that is higher than the CC in support of high-dose moxifloxacin treatment as part of the longer individualised MDR/RR-TB regimen (table 1) [10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Inappropriately high breakpoints have resulted in systematic false-susceptible AST results to anti-TB drugs. MIC, PK/PD and clinical outcome data should be combined when setting breakpoints to minimise the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. https://bit.ly/3i43wb6
... The epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) as a conservative clinical breakpoint. Phenotypic AST relies on clinical breakpoints that distinguish samples that are susceptible at the standard dosing regimen of a drug because they have a high likelihood of therapeutic success compared to those that do not and, consequently, are resistant (8). For some agents, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has introduced the third category, I, as "susceptible, increased exposure" (i.e., a microorganism is categorized as I when there is a high likelihood of therapeutic success, because exposure to the agent is increased by adjusting the dosing regimen or by its concentration at the site of infection, which differs from "intermediate" as defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] [9,10]). ...
... When an antibiotic that does not share any resistance mechanism with a previously used agent is first evaluated, the MICs of that drug usually form a normal distribution that captures both the limited preexisting biological variability and the technical variability of MIC testing (i.e., no major differences in the intrinsic resistance typically exist, although exceptions are possible, as is the case for pyrazinamide and thioacetazone [8,11,12]). The upper end of this distribution of phenotypically wild-type (pWT) strains corresponds to the ECV, which is referred to as the critical concentration (CC) in the TB field (13,14). ...
... Even though drug-resistant TB is estimated to account for a quarter of annual deaths attributable to antimicrobial resistance, it is becoming increasingly clear that not following modern principles to assess MICs, PK/PD, and clinical outcome data to set clinical breakpoints has adversely affected patient treatment (8,44). Indeed, WHO revised numerous incorrect breakpoints for second-line drugs in 2018 and also questioned the validity of all CLSI-endorsed CCs for rifabutin in its aforementioned report (7,13). ...
Article
Full-text available
In a recent report of a systematic review of critical concentrations (CCs), the World Health Organization (WHO) lowered the rifampin (RIF) CC for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using Middlebrook 7H10 medium and the BACTEC Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system from 1 to 0.5 μg/mL. The previous RIF CC for 7H10 had been in use for over half a century. Because it had served as the de facto reference standard, it contributed to the endorsement of inappropriately high CCs for other AST methods, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MGIT system. Moreover, this resulted in confusion about the interpretation of seven borderline resistance mutations in rpoB (i.e., L430P, D435Y, H445L, H445N, H445S, L452P, and I491F). In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology , J. Shea, T. A. Halse, D. Kohlerschmidt, P. Lapierre, et al. (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01885-20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01885-20 ) provide evidence that the CC endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for the Sensititre MYCOTB system, which is not FDA-approved but is CE-IVD marked in the European Union, is likely also too high. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating AST methods against a rigorously defined reference standard, as recently proposed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, as well as the value of routine next-generation sequencing for investigating discordant AST results.
... Clinical breakpoints are currently set and published primarily by two organizations in the world: the European EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) and the American CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute), and partly by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) [3,4]. The determination of clinical breakpoints (BP) requires the cooperation of specialists in various fields: microbiologists, pharmacologists, infectious diseases physicians, but also experts in data processing and statistical analysis [33,34]. BP determination requires taking into account antibiotic doses including the maximum doses for which these values will be established, clinical indications for which they will be applied and reference to the specific micro-organisms. ...
... The presence of resistance mechanisms to various antibiotics is also subject to phenotypic and genotypic evaluation. Among very important steps is the analysis of pharmacokinetic/dynamic parameters (the fate of drugs in the body and their activity against bacteria) in preclinical and clinical trials [34,38]. Literature reports also need to be analyzed and clinical breakpoints for MIC need to be finally set but in such a manner so that they do not separate MIC values for wild type strains [34]. ...
... Among very important steps is the analysis of pharmacokinetic/dynamic parameters (the fate of drugs in the body and their activity against bacteria) in preclinical and clinical trials [34,38]. Literature reports also need to be analyzed and clinical breakpoints for MIC need to be finally set but in such a manner so that they do not separate MIC values for wild type strains [34]. MIC clinical breakpoints in turn are used to establish the clinical breakpoints for the disc-diffusion method correlating with the BP for MIC. ...
Article
Full-text available
Inefficiency of medical therapies used in order to cure patients with bacterial infections requires not only to actively look for new therapeutic strategies but also to carefully select antibiotics based on variety of parameters, including microbiological. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) defines in vitro levels of susceptibility or resistance of specific bacterial strains to applied antibiotic. Reliable assessment of MIC has a significant impact on the choice of a therapeutic strategy, which affects efficiency of an infection therapy. In order to obtain credible MIC, many elements must be considered, such as proper method choice, adherence to labeling rules, and competent interpretation of the results. In this paper, two methods have been discussed: dilution and gradient used for MIC estimation. Factors which affect MIC results along with the interpretation guidelines have been described. Furthermore, opportunities to utilize MIC in clinical practice, with pharmacokinetic /pharmacodynamic parameters taken into consideration, have been investigated. Due to problems related to PK determination in individual patients, statistical estimation of the possibility of achievement of the PK/PD index, based on the Monte Carlo, was discussed. In order to provide comprehensive insights, the possible limitations of MIC, which scientists are aware of, have been outlined.
... Most AST, and its interpretation, is conducted using internationally recognised standards developed by bodies including the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) ( Table 1) (Magiorakos et al., 2012;Kahlmeter, 2015;Humphries et al., 2019). Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria (STIC), also known as "breakpoints, " are used to determine the optimal dose of antimicrobials for treating infection and are based on those published by the CLSI, EUCAST, USCAST and the FDA. ...
... Different documents describe breakpoints for bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi (moulds) and other microorganisms ( Table 1). Despite many similarities and agreements, there remains some lack of harmonisation between AST methods from different organisations (Pfaller et al., 2011(Pfaller et al., , 2014Chowdhary et al., 2015;Kahlmeter, 2015;Brown et al., 2016;Sanguinetti and Posteraro, 2018;Simjee et al., 2018;Cusack et al., 2019). Interpretive categories most commonly assigned are susceptible (S), indicative of a high probability of a successful outcome, and resistant (R), indicative of a low probability of a successful outcome, although in less common cases other categories include; non-susceptible, intermediate, susceptible-dose dependent and area of technical uncertainty (See the documents in Table 1 for details about these interpretive categories). ...
... If AMP are to realise their potential as a future generation of anti-infective therapeutics, AST methods will require approval from regulatory authorities and buy-in from organisations such as EUCAST, CLSI, and ISO (Kahlmeter, 2015;CLSI, 2018g). To do this, any AST method for AMP or modification to an AST method, at least for EUCAST, must be calibrated to the ISO broth microdilution technique, often as part of the formal accreditation process (Kahlmeter, 2015;ISO, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
During the development of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) as potential therapeutics, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) stands as an essential part of the process in identification and optimisation of candidate AMP. Standard methods for AST, developed almost 60 years ago for testing conventional antibiotics, are not necessarily fit for purpose when it comes to determining the susceptibility of microorganisms to AMP. Without careful consideration of the parameters comprising AST there is a risk of failing to identify novel antimicrobials at a time when antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is leading the planet toward a post-antibiotic era. More physiologically/clinically relevant AST will allow better determination of the preclinical activity of drug candidates and allow the identification of lead compounds. An important consideration is the efficacy of AMP in biological matrices replicating sites of infection, e.g., blood/plasma/serum, lung bronchiolar lavage fluid/sputum, urine, biofilms, etc., as this will likely be more predictive of clinical efficacy. Additionally, specific AST for different target microorganisms may help to better predict efficacy of AMP in specific infections. In this manuscript, we describe what we believe are the key considerations for AST of AMP and hope that this information can better guide the preclinical development of AMP toward becoming a new generation of urgently needed antimicrobials.
... For pragmatic and historical reasons, the vast majority of routine phenotypic AST for the MTBC has traditionally been done by testing only the breakpoints, which are known as critical concentrations and were first defined in the 1960s [1]. This contrasts with other bacterial pathogens, for which quantitative AST results are often routinely obtained using MIC testing or disc diffusion calibrated against the reference MIC method [2]. Nevertheless, accurate MIC testing is indispensable, even for MTBC. ...
... Nevertheless, accurate MIC testing is indispensable, even for MTBC. Indeed, clinical breakpoints, as defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), cannot be set unless MIC distributions tested with a standardized method in multiple laboratories are pooled to define epidemiological cut-off values (Fig. 1), and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical outcome data are evaluated [2]. In addition, it is becoming increasingly clear that MICs are needed in some routine clinical scenarios. ...
... Normally, the QC strain is chosen to be devoid of resistance mechanisms. This means that the QC range is typically inside the phenotypically wild-type MIC distribution for strains devoid of phenotypically detectable resistance mechanisms (i.e. the upper end of the QC range is equal to or below the epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) and the clinical breakpoint (CB) for the susceptible (S) and resistant (R) range [2]). ...
... Instead, evidence is mounting that some critical concentrations (CCs), which are set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and/or WHO and define resistance on a phenotypic level, are higher than the epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs), which represent the highest concentration of the wild-type MIC distribution (6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). As a result, some isolates with elevated MICs compared to the ECOFF due to known mutations are classified as susceptible even though limited pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics or clinical outcome data exist that these isolates are still treatable (6,12,13,16). Therefore, this study had two main goals. ...
... Our results did not provide direct evidence that treatment regimens based on different genotypic DST methods have an impact on clinical outcomes. Moreover, data from more laboratories including both drug-resistant and drug-susceptible isolates are required to set ECOFFs with confidence (16,48). Nevertheless, the fact that potential breakpoint artifacts were found for so many key drugs underlines the urgent need for both CLSI and WHO to reexamine their CCs, which were set largely based on expert opinion using evidence that was not or was insufficiently documented, as opposed to modern and transparent principles pioneered by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (6,12,16). ...
... Moreover, data from more laboratories including both drug-resistant and drug-susceptible isolates are required to set ECOFFs with confidence (16,48). Nevertheless, the fact that potential breakpoint artifacts were found for so many key drugs underlines the urgent need for both CLSI and WHO to reexamine their CCs, which were set largely based on expert opinion using evidence that was not or was insufficiently documented, as opposed to modern and transparent principles pioneered by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (6,12,16). Importantly, this should include clear recommendations about how to proceed when discrepant results between genotypic assays and pDST are found (49). Ideally, these recommendations should consider MICs as well as clinical outcome data. ...
Article
Full-text available
Rapid and accurate drug-susceptibility testing (DST) is essential for the treatment of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB). We compared the utility of genotypic DST assays with phenotypic DST (pDST) using BACTEC 960 MGIT or Löwenstein-Jensen to construct M/XDR-TB treatment regimens for a cohort of 25 consecutive M/XDR-TB patients and 15 possible anti-TB drugs. Genotypic DST results from Cepheid GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and line probe assays (LPAs: Hain GenoType MTBDR plus 2.0 and MTBDR sl 2.0)] and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were translated into individual algorithm-derived treatment regimens for each patient. We further analysed if discrepancies between the various methods were due to flaws in the genotypic or phenotypic test using MIC results. Compared with pDST, the average agreement in the number of drugs prescribed in ‘genotypic' regimens ranged from just 49% (95% CI 39-59%) for Xpert and 63% (95% CI 56-70%) for LPAs to 93% (95% CI 88-98%) for WGS. Only the WGS regimens did not comprise any drugs to which pDST showed resistance. Importantly, MIC testing revealed that pDST likely underestimated the true rate of resistance for key drugs (rifampicin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and kanamycin) because critical concentrations (CCs) were too high. WGS can be used to rule-in resistance even in M/XDR strains with complex resistance patterns, but pDST for some drugs is still needed to confirm susceptibility and construct the final regimens. Some CCs for pDST need to be re-examined to avoid systematic false-susceptible results in low-level resistant isolates.
... The few analyses that included strains of other members of the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) were not aimed at setting an epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF). 16,18 More recently, pretomanid MIC testing from 56 baseline isolates from Nix-TB (the data from which are included in this study) showed MICs between 0.03 and 1 mg/L using the BACTEC™ Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system by Becton Dickinson. These results informed the provisional critical concentration (CC; see Supplementary data at JAC Online for an overview of the different terminology used for breakpoints in the TB field) of 1 mg/L included in the Summary of Product Characteristics by EMA. 2 In this study, we developed a standardized protocol for routine phenotypic AST of MTBC for pretomanid, using MGIT with the EpiCenter™/TB eXiST™ software. ...
... Instead, PK/PD and clinical evidence is required to demonstrate that the proposed dosing regimen is sufficient to treat pWT strains successfully, in which case the ECOFF can be used as the CB and pWT strains become clinically susceptible. 18 In this scenario, the ECOFF represents a conservative CB until sufficient evidence becomes available that phenotypically non-wild-type strains with MICs . ECOFF are treatable (i.e. during the first trials of novel agents such strains are usually too rare to investigate this question). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. Methods: The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six laboratories to determine the MICs of a phylogenetically diverse collection of 356 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to establish the epidemiological cut-off value for pretomanid. MICs were correlated with WGS data to study the genetic basis of differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid. Results: We observed ancient differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid among various members of MTBC. Most notably, lineage 1 of M. tuberculosis, which is estimated to account for 28% of tuberculosis cases globally, was less susceptible than lineages 2, 3, 4 and 7 of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a 99th percentile of 2 mg/L for lineage 1 compared with 0.5 mg/L for the remaining M. tuberculosis lineages. Moreover, we observed that higher MICs (≥8 mg/L), which probably confer resistance, had recently evolved independently in six different M. tuberculosis strains. Unlike the aforementioned ancient differences in susceptibility, these recent differences were likely caused by mutations in the known pretomanid resistance genes. Conclusions: In light of these findings, the provisional critical concentration of 1 mg/L for MGIT set by EMA must be re-evaluated. More broadly, these findings underline the importance of considering the global diversity of MTBC during clinical development of drugs and when defining breakpoints for AST.
... It is not clear whether these particular MIC increases are clinically significant given that no pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for the efficacy of BDQ or CFZ have been set by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) or WHO [9,34]. Instead, conservative clinical breakpoints (CBs), as defined by EUCAST, have been set that correspond to the likely epidemiologic cut-off values (ECOFFs) of 1 mg/L [9,35]. Consequently, it was assumed that any MIC increase above the ECOFF would result in worse treatment outcomes, until strong evidence to the contrary is presented. ...
... Consequently, it was assumed that any MIC increase above the ECOFF would result in worse treatment outcomes, until strong evidence to the contrary is presented. In such a case, the CB could be raised above the ECOFF and/or a second, higher CB could be introduced to define a range of susceptibility at increased exposure (previously known as "intermediate") [35,36]. This does not mean that isolates with MICs at or below the current CB are necessarily susceptible given that they could harbour a resistance mechanism that results in only modest MIC increases. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains not detected by commercial molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) assays due to the RpoB I491F resistance mutation are threatening the control of MDR tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Eswatini. Methods We investigate the evolution and spread of MDR strains in Eswatini with a focus on bedaquiline (BDQ) and clofazimine (CFZ) resistance using whole-genome sequencing in two collections ((1) national drug resistance survey, 2009–2010; (2) MDR strains from the Nhlangano region, 2014–2017). Results MDR strains in collection 1 had a high cluster rate (95%, 117/123 MDR strains) with 55% grouped into the two largest clusters (gCL3, n = 28; gCL10, n = 40). All gCL10 isolates, which likely emerged around 1993 (95% highest posterior density 1987–1998), carried the mutation RpoB I491F that is missed by commercial mDST assays. In addition, 21 (53%) gCL10 isolates shared a Rv0678 M146T mutation that correlated with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to BDQ and CFZ compared to wild type isolates. gCL10 isolates with the Rv0678 M146T mutation were also detected in collection 2. Conclusion The high clustering rate suggests that transmission has been driving the MDR-TB epidemic in Eswatini for three decades. The presence of MDR strains in Eswatini that are not detected by commercial mDST assays and have elevated MICs to BDQ and CFZ potentially jeopardizes the successful implementation of new MDR-TB treatment guidelines. Measures to limit the spread of these outbreak isolates need to be implemented urgently.
... Although CC values were determined based on microbiological and clinical evidence, this was done only for certain drugs and media, which complicates the use of these values today [3]. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) sets clinical breakpoints (CBs) by evaluating epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs), based on MIC distributions, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and clinical outcome data together [7]. This approach has now been used for most antibacterial and antifungal agents, enabling highquality pAST globally. ...
... This revealed that some CCs had been too high, resulting in the misclassification of some resistant strains as susceptible. In general, the quality and quantity of MIC data available for the majority of agents were insufficient to define ECOFFs according to the criteria adopted by EUCAST [7,8]. For example, MICs were often truncated because inappropriate concentration ranges were tested, which precluded a comprehensive assessment of the phenotypically wildtype MIC distributions [9,10]. ...
... The quantitative counterpart test is determination of an antimicrobial inhibitory concentration by growth of bacteria in a series of increasing concentrations of antimicrobial agent. The lowest concentration at which growth inhibition is observed is designated the minimum inhibitory concentration, or MIC [10]. The international AST standard method for MIC determination uses a microtitre plate, and is therefore known as broth microdilution (BMD) [11]. ...
... In some cases, their processing speed in preliminary studies puts their results inside the 10 min-1 h-8 h timeline described above. However, the culture-dependent reference MIC method and the constraints of regulatory requirements for in vitro medical diagnostic devices are significant obstacles to further progress [10,11]. In our experience, recent improvements in analytical flow cytometry provide the optical, fluidic, electronic and probe features needed for comparable accuracy to the BMD reference method but at higher speed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Current methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are too slow to affect initial treatment decisions in the early stages of sepsis, when the prescriber is most concerned to select effective therapy immediately, rather than finding out what will not work 1 or 2 days later. There is a clear need for much faster differentiation between viral and bacterial infection, and AST, linked to earlier aetiological diagnosis, without sacrificing either the accuracy of quantitative AST or the low cost of qualitative AST. Truly rapid AST methods are eagerly awaited, and there are several candidate technologies that aim to improve the targeting of our limited stock of effective antimicrobial agents. However, none of these technologies are approaching the point of care and nor can they be described as truly culture-independent diagnostic tests. Rapid chemical and genomic methods of resistance detection are not yet reliable predictors of antimicrobial susceptibility and often rely on prior bacterial isolation. In order to resolve the trade-off between diagnostic confidence and therapeutic efficacy in increasingly antimicrobial-resistant sepsis, we propose a series of three linked decision milestones: initial clinical assessment (e.g. qSOFA score) within 10 min, initial laboratory tests and presumptive antimicrobial therapy within 1 h, and definitive AST with corresponding antimicrobial amendment within an 8 h window (i.e. the same working day). Truly rapid AST methods therefore must be integrated into the clinical laboratory workflow to ensure maximum impact on clinical outcomes of sepsis, and diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship. The requisite series of development stages come with a substantial regulatory burden that hinders the translation of innovation into practice. The regulatory hurdles for the adoption of rapid AST technology emphasize technical accuracy, but progress will also rely on the effect rapid AST has on prescribing behaviour by physicians managing the care of patients with sepsis. Early adopters in well-equipped teaching centres in close proximity to large clinical laboratories are likely to be early beneficiaries of rapid AST, while simplified and lower-cost technology is needed to support poorly resourced hospitals in developing countries, with their higher burden of AMR. If we really want the clinical laboratory to deliver a specific, same-day diagnosis underpinned by definitive AST results, we are going to have to advocate more effectively for the clinical benefits of bacterial detection and susceptibility testing at critical decision points in the sepsis management pathway.
... Furthermore, the PK/PD drivers for efficacy of several drugs are poorly understood, which means that drug dosing may not be optimal (Gumbo et al., 2015). Nevertheless, these data are crucial for setting one or two clinical CBs per drug, as defined by EUCAST (Kahlmeter, 2015). Indeed, the ECOFF merely represents the upper end of the distribution of phenotypically wild type strains and is therefore the lowest possible CB, but not automatically the CB (i.e. it is possible to define ECOFFs even for compounds that have no clinical benefit). ...
... In summary, despite the consensus that antibiotic resistance represents a key driver for poor treatment outcomes, the standards to define resistance that apply to all other major bacterial pathogens have not been followed for traditional anti-TB drugs (Ängeby et al., 2012;Kahlmeter, 2015). By commissioning two landmark systematic reviews, WHO has taken important steps to rectify this issue, but a more concerted effort is needed by the wider TB field and funders. ...
Article
Despite being fundamental to all treatment decisions, the breakpoints that define susceptibility and resistance to conventional anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs were traditionally defined based on expert opinion as opposed to modern microbiological principles. As a result, the breakpoints for several key drugs (i.e. amikacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) were too high, resulting in the systematic misclassification of a proportion of resistant strains as susceptible. Moreover, a recent systematic review of clinical outcome data prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to make significant changes to its treatment guidelines. For example, capreomycin and kanamycin are no longer recommended for TB treatment because their use correlates with worse clinical outcomes. This history notwithstanding, robust breakpoints still do not exist for bedaquiline and delamanid six years after their approval. This was compounded by the fact that access to both agents for drug-susceptibility testing had initially been restricted. It is incumbent upon the European Medicines Agency, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and WHO to ensure that drug developers generate the necessary data to set breakpoints as a prerequisite for the approval of new agents.
... Data from additional laboratories are needed to define robust quality-control ranges/targets to evaluate whether the current CC of 0.1 g/ml corresponds to the epidemiological cutoff and to define the lower and upper ends of the various resistance mechanisms more accurately (3,7,13). Moreover, breakpoints cannot be set based on MIC data alone (5,14,15). Nevertheless, the MIC distributions in this study have implications for defining low-level resistance. The current clinical breakpoint of CLSI to define low-level resistance (i.e., 0.4 g/ml, which corresponds to 0.5 g/ml using our dilution series) does not correspond to the upper end of the MIC distribution of inhA promoter mutants. ...
... For strains with only inhA promoter mutations, this target concentration would be 1 or 2 g/ml (i.e., at least 10 times higher than the current CC) (3,7). Should pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, drug penetration, and clinical outcome data confirm that this target is achievable, 1 or 2 g/ml may be adopted instead of 0.4 g/ml (14,15). This would avoid splitting the MIC distribution of inhA promoter mutants and would, consequently, reduce or eliminate their misclassification as high-level resistant because of the technical variation in AST, as is the case with the current clinical breakpoint of CLSI. ...
Article
Full-text available
MIC testing using the BACTEC 960 MGIT system of 70 phylogenetically diverse, isoniazid-resistant clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed a complex pattern of overlapping MIC distributions. Whole-genome sequencing could explain most of the level of resistance observed. The MIC distribution of strains with only inhA promoter mutations was split by the current concentration that is endorsed by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute to detect low-level resistance to isoniazid and is therefore likely not optimally set.
... Moreover, ECVs have an important role in tracking MIC elevation and emergence of resistance. ECVs are determined based on MIC distributions integrating information from with drug resistance mechanisms whenever available, whereas BPs are based on data for ECVs, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and correlation of the MIC with clinical outcome [20][21][22]. Therefore, the NWT or WT is not equivalent with the terms "susceptible" or "resistant" [14] to an antifungal agent. ...
Article
Full-text available
Commercial tests are often employed in clinical microbiology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been defined in order to detect non-wild-type (NWT) isolates harboring resistance mechanisms. We reviewed the literature in order to find studies where commercial methods were used to evaluate for in vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungi and assess their ability to detect NWT isolates according to the available ECVs. Data were found for the gradient concentration strips Etest and MIC Test Strips (MTS), broth microdilution Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), Micronaut-AM and the agar dilution VIPcheck assays. Applying itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole Etest ECVs for A. fumigatus, Etest was able to detect 90.3% (84/93), 61.2% (90/147) and 86% (31/36) of isolates with known cyp51A mutations, respectively. Moreover, Etest also was able to detect 3/3 fks mutants using caspofungin ECVs and 2/3 micafungin mutant isolates. Applying the voriconazole and posaconazole SYO ECVs, 57.7% (67/116) and 100% (47/47) of mutants with known cyp51A substitutions were classified as NWT, respectively. VIPcheck detected 90.3% (159/176), 80.1% (141/176) and 66% (141/176)of mutants via itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively, whereas Micronaut-AM detected 88% (22/25). In conclusion, Etest posaconazole and itraconazole, as well as micafungin and caspofungin ECVs, detected A. fumigatus mutants. On the other hand, while the posaconazole SYO ECV was able to detect cyp51A mutants, similar data were not observed with the SYO voriconazole ECV.
... This cut-off value intends to identify the value separating the "wild type" subpopulation and the subpopulation with acquired or mutational (increased) resistance to the drug of interest. Using agreed criteria for the acceptance of MIC distributions, (official or tentative) ECOFFs can be then proposed by national and international agencies (e.g., Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Monitoring and investigating temporal trends in antimicrobial data is a high priority for human and animal health authorities. Timely detection of temporal changes in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) can rely not only on monitoring and analyzing the proportion of resistant isolates based on the use of a clinical or epidemiological cut-off value, but also on more subtle changes and trends in the full distribution of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The nature of the MIC distribution is categorical and ordinal (discrete). In this contribution, we developed a particular family of multicategory logit models for estimating and modelling MIC distributions over time. It allows the detection of a multitude of temporal trends in the full discrete distribution, without any assumption on the underlying continuous distribution for the MIC values. The experimental ranges of the serial dilution experiments may vary across laboratories and over time. The proposed categorical model allows to estimate the MIC distribution over the maximal range of the observed experiments, and allows the observed ranges to vary across labs and over time. The use and performance of the model is illustrated with two datasets on AMR in Salmonella .
... Beyond this bell-shaped distribution, strains with mechanisms causing decreased susceptibility are found ( Figure 1). The highest MIC of the wild-type distribution is designated the epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) [24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Inhaled antibiotics are a common and valuable therapy for patients suffering from chronic lung infection, with this particularly well demonstrated for patients with cystic fibrosis. However, in vitro tests to predict patient response to inhaled antibiotic therapy are currently lacking. There are indications that antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) may have a role in guidance of therapy, but which tests would correlate best still needs to be researched in clinical studies or animal models. Applying the principles of EUCAST methodology, the analysis of relevant and reliable data correlating different AST tests to patients’ outcomes may yield clinical breakpoints for susceptibility, but these data are currently unavailable. At present, we believe that it is unlikely that standard determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) will prove the best predictor.
... A second technique applied was analysis of microbial populations to observe the presence of subpopulations with different degrees of resistance to antimicrobials within a single species. Subpopulations based on differences in resistance to antibiotics have been derived, termed epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs), based on criteria that are relevant in clinical medicine [21][22][23][24]. Similar methods have been applied in attempts to define ECOFFs for biocides [25]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chlorhexidine (CHX) was introduced for use as an antimicrobial more than 70 years ago. CHX has been and continues to be used broadly for disinfecting surfaces in medical and food service facilities as well as directly on skin of humans and animals. Considering its widespread use over many decades, questions of resistance to CHX have been raised. Additionally, questions of possible coincident resistance to the biocide and resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics have also been raised. A number of important questions remain, including is there consistent evidence of resistance, what is the degree of resistance, especially among clinically isolated microbial strains, and what is the degree of resistance compared to the typical concentrations of the biocide used? Data for microbial species isolated over the last 70+ years were compiled to construct as complete a picture as practical regarding possible resistance, especially among species in which resistance to commonly used antibiotics has been noted to be increasing. This is a compilation and analysis of individual MIC values for CHX reported in the literature, not a compilation of the conclusions individual authors reached. The data were analyzed using straight-forward and robust statistical procedures to detect changes in susceptibility to CHX over time, i.e. linear regression. Linear regression was supplemented with the use of nonlinear least squares regression analysis to detect the presence of population parameters associated with subpopulations of microbial strains which exhibit increased resistance to CHX. Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Acinetobacter baumannii were all found to have an increased resistance to CHX over time with the most profound change detected in A . baumannii . Additionally, subpopulations with log-normal distributions were found consistent with the presence of a baseline subpopulation of susceptible strains and a subpopulation with increased resistance to CHX. However, the CHX-resistant subpopulations did not correlate exactly with antibiotic resistance, so details of the relationship remain to be addressed. Increased resistance over time was not detected for Escherichia coli , Enterobacter faecalis , Staphylococcus aureus , or Candida albicans , although a subpopulation with greater than baseline resistance to CHX was detected among strains of E . faecalis and C . albicans . A difference in susceptibility to CHX was also detected between methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) S . aureus strains. The levels of resistance to CHX detected were all markedly lower than concentrations routinely used in medical and food service applications. Reaching conclusions regarding the relationship between antibiotic and CHX resistance was complicated by the limited overlap between tests of CHX and antibiotic resistance for several species. The results compiled here may serve as a foundation for monitoring changes in resistance to CHX and possible relationships between the use of CHX and resistance to antibiotics commonly used in clinical medicine.
... On the advice of the new chair, ESCMID, in 2001 and 2002, reorganized the EUCAST with national committees being given a major role and with a new task, namely, to harmonize breakpoints and methods in Europe (1)(2)(3). A General Committee (GC), with representatives from almost all European countries, and a Steering Committee (SC) were formed. ...
Article
Full-text available
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) is an international susceptibility testing committee, organized by the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and functioning as the breakpoint advisory committee of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The original remit of EUCAST was to harmonize European clinical breakpoints, but very soon the activities expanded beyond the borders of Europe and included newly licensed agents in Europe. Among the milestones were the aggregating of large numbers of MIC distributions, creating a software to display these distributions, the EUCAST concept of identifying epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF), and the development of a EUCAST disk diffusion method. The EUCAST Development Laboratory has played a critical role in the development of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methodology including development work for novel antimicrobial agents and for rapid AST directly from blood culture bottles. EUCAST has several standing subcommittees – for AST in fungi (AFST), mycobacteria (AMST) and for microorganisms of veterinary interest (VetCAST), and ad hoc subcommittees on subjects such as anaerobic bacteria, MIC and zone diameter distributions and epidemiological cut off values, the relationship between phenotypic and genotypic resistance, expert rules and methods for the detection of resistance mechanisms. All EUCAST decisions are subjected to the EUCAST public consultation process, the only exception being breakpoints of novel antimicrobial agents where confidentiality agreements during the licensing process prevents public participation. EUCAST has recently revised the definitions of clinical susceptibility interpretive categories S, I and R acknowledging the intimate relationship between drug exposure and susceptibility reporting.
... The ECOFF is the upper end of the wild-type distribution (i.e. highest MIC for isolates devoid of phenotypically detectable resistance) [15,16]. The EUCAST website provides a list of these ECOFF values. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Cefazolin is the first choice antibiotic prophylaxis during cardiac surgery and is widely used to prevent deep sternal wound infections (DSWI). Recently, the Dutch guideline has been changed where the cefazolin dose given at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), has been removed and the postoperative dosages are both halved. The aim of the study is to assess if adequate cefazolin plasma levels are obtained with the new Dutch guideline. Methods: Twenty-four adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), receiving cefazolin were studied. The main goal is 100% fT >MIC during surgery and epidemiological cutoff is 2 mg/L. During the postoperative phase the goal is 40% fT >MIC. Per patient 9 to 11 blood samples were collected to measure plasma cefazolin concentrations. Results: During surgery 100% of the measured concentrations were above the ECOFF of 2mg/L. BMI was not significantly associated with unbound cefazolin concentrations. Sex, age, albumin levels preoperative and duration of CPB were also not significantly associated with cefazolin unbound concentration. Redose was significantly associated with higher total plasma concentration. In the postoperative phase 85% were above the ECOFF of 2mg/L. Conclusion: This study shows that the unbound cefazolin concentration during surgery is 100% above the ECOFF of 2mg/L, though sometimes close to the minimum. In the postoperative period more than 85% was above the ECOFF of 2mg/L.
... Drug resistance is most often assayed as the ability of a strain to grow in the presence of a single 'breakpoint' concentration of a given antibiotic and is reported as a binary phenotype [1]. However, it is clear in many cases that drug susceptibility measured as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is a continuous variable [2,3]. Further, quantitative shifts in MIC below conventional breakpoint concentrations have been associated with poor clinical treatment outcome, as in vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Genomic dissection of antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens has largely focused on genetic changes conferring growth above a single critical concentration of drug. However, reduced susceptibility to antibiotics—even below this breakpoint—is associated with poor treatment outcomes in the clinic, including in tuberculosis. Clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exhibit extensive quantitative variation in antibiotic susceptibility but the genetic basis behind this spectrum of drug susceptibility remains ill-defined. Through a genome wide association study, we show that non-synonymous mutations in dnaA , which encodes an essential and highly conserved regulator of DNA replication, are associated with drug resistance in clinical M . tuberculosis strains. We demonstrate that these dnaA mutations specifically enhance M . tuberculosis survival during isoniazid treatment via reduced expression of katG , the activator of isoniazid. To identify DnaA interactors relevant to this phenotype, we perform the first genome-wide biochemical mapping of DnaA binding sites in mycobacteria which reveals a DnaA interaction site that is the target of recurrent mutation in clinical strains. Reconstructing clinically prevalent mutations in this DnaA interaction site reproduces the phenotypes of dnaA mutants, suggesting that clinical strains of M . tuberculosis have evolved mutations in a previously uncharacterized DnaA pathway that quantitatively increases resistance to the key first-line antibiotic isoniazid. Discovering genetic mechanisms that reduce drug susceptibility and support the evolution of high-level drug resistance will guide development of biomarkers capable of prospectively identifying patients at risk of treatment failure in the clinic.
... We evaluated optimized protocols for MIC determination on the M. tuberculosis complex following EUCAST methodology and principles [5]. The objective was to provide a reproducible MIC method for setting epidemiological cut-off values. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The first objective of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) subcommittee for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing (AMST), launched in 2016, was to set a reference method for determining the MICs of antituberculous agents, since many protocols are used worldwide and a consensus one is needed for the determination of microbiological breakpoints. Methods During 2017 and 2018, MIC determination protocols were evaluated prospectively in a multicentre study within the four AMST laboratories. MIC results were obtained for isoniazid, levofloxacin and amikacin on the reference strain Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294. Broth microdilution (BMD) in Middlebrook 7H9 and solid medium dilution (SMD) in Middlebrook 7H10 were performed using two inoculum concentrations. MICs were interpreted with regard to visual and 99% inhibition after 7, 14 or 21 days of incubation for BMD and 21 days for SMD. Results Following the EUCAST reference protocol, intra- and inter-assay agreements were within ±1 MIC dilution for >95% of the observations for the three drugs in both methods. MIC values, presented as MIC mode (range) for BMD and SMD respectively, were: 0.03 (0.015–0.06) mg/L and 0.12 (0.06–0.25) mg/L for isoniazid, 0.25 mg/L (0.25–0.5) and 0.5 mg/L (0.12–0.5) for levofloxacin, and 0.5 mg/L (0.5–1.0) and 0.5 mg/L (0.5–1.0) for amikacin. Conclusions Both SMD and BMD were reproducible and eligible as a reference method for MIC determination of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). BMD was finally selected as the EUCAST reference method. From now on it will be used to set epidemiological cut-off values and clinical breakpoints of new and old antituberculous agents.
... A clinical breakpoint is an MIC value that should separate strains likely to respond to treatment from strains with the likelihood to fail on treatment (89). Clinical breakpoints according to the SIR-system (S=susceptible, I=intermediate or more appropriate "susceptible, increased exposure", R=resistant) set by EUCAST are based on three main important elements; (i) MIC wild-type distribution of the bacteria which determines the ECOFF; (ii) PK/PD aspects of the drug; (iii) data from studies on clinical outcome (78). ...
... EUCAST rapid AST validated in 55 European laboratories JAC (i) The use of species-specific breakpoints avoids the splitting of WT distributions (distributions of MICs for organisms without phenotypically detectable resistance mechanisms) and thereby increases reproducibility of susceptibility categorization. [33][34][35][36][37] Because of the poorer separation between WT and non-WT distributions with shortened incubation, distinguishing between susceptible and resistant isolates becomes even more difficult. (ii) The use of incubation-time-specific breakpoints takes into account the incomplete antibiotic diffusion in the agar after short incubation and the progress of zone diameter development over time. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. Methods: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16-20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. Results: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. Conclusions: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4-6 h of incubation.
... Europe and several other regions adhere to the EUCAST recommendations. The EUCAST guidelines are generally freely available on the committee's website, a fact that might make them more attractive compared with the protocols marketed by the CLSI [24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Due to the increasing numbers of fungal infections and the emergence of drug-resistant fungi, optimization and standardization of diagnostic methods for the measurement of antifungal susceptibility are ongoing. The M27-A4 document by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is presently used for the interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations of major opportunistic yeast species as measured by broth microdilution testing in many countries. Although microdilution is considered a benchmark for reproducible and accurate results, increased testing capacity, and limited human bias, the method is often inaccessible to routine clinical laboratories and researchers, especially in low-income countries. Furthermore, several studies suggest that there are still a considerable number of factors that make the estimation of in vitro activity of antifungal agents challenging. This review article summarizes the limitations of the M27-A4 standard which, despite the advances and improvements obtained by the standardization of antimicrobial resistance testing methods by CLSI, still persist.
... MIC determination of each agent should be done by testing at least eight concentrations in separated wells to cover the full range of potential MIC values (outlined in Table 2 and Fig. 1) with at least one concentration below and one above the MIC target. ECOFFs and breakpoints cannot be established using off-scale MIC values below or above a truncated range of concentrations [13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Scope Several methods are used worldwide for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). The variability in the results obtained with these methods hampers to set epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values and clinical breakpoints according to EUCAST guidelines. Methods for susceptibility testing and determination of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) need to be standardized for MTBC isolates for old and new agents. Our objective was to establish a standardized reference method for MIC determination of the MTBC. Methods The EUCAST antimycobacterial susceptibility testing subcommittee (AMST) compared protocols of MIC determination with regard to medium, inoculum preparation, antituberculous agent preparation, incubation, reading of the results and interpretation. Recommendations The EUCAST reference method of MIC determination for MTBC is the broth microdilution method in Middlebrook 7H9-10%OADC medium. The final inoculum is a 10⁵ CFU/ml suspension, from a 10-2 dilution of a 0.5 McFarland suspension prepared after vortexing bacterial colonies with glass beads before suspending them in water. The culture is maintained in a U-shaped 96-well polystyrene microtiter sterile plate with a lid incubated at 36°+1°C. Reading is done using an inverted mirror as soon as the 1:100 diluted control (i.e. 10³ CFU/ml) shows visual growth. The MIC, expressed in mg/L, is the lowest concentration which inhibits visual growth. M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294 is used as the reference strain and its targeted MIC values are within the range 0.03-0.12 for isoniazid, 0.12-0.5 for levofloxacin and 0.25-1 mg/L for amikacin. Conclusions The EUCAST reference method for MTBC was endorsed by EUCAST after public consultation and will from now on be used to define EUCAST ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints. This reference method is not primarily intended to be used under routine conditions and the AST methods need to be calibrated against this reference method to be used with EUCAST breakpoints.
... However, we only included a limited number of wild-type strains, thus limiting the definition of ECOFFs according to EUCAST principles. 25 Third, one strain with the Gln517Gln mutation had s an elevated MIC compared to the ECOFF, suggesting that it harbours another mutation missed by Xpert, (i.e. either because it is outside of the rpoB region interrogated or because its frequency is below the limit of detection of Xpert). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The three-month difference in turnaround time between Xpert and conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) causes patient treatment challenges when pDST rifampin (RIF) susceptibility results and earlier Xpert results disagree, resulting in unnecessary tuberculosis (TB) patient exposure to toxic second-line drugs. Here, the prevalence of discordant RIF susceptibility test results, specifically Xpert (resistant) versus pDST (susceptible) results, was determined. Methods Tuberculosis patients enrolled between January 2015 and June 2018 at Beijing Chest Hospital who consecutively tested positive for RIF resistance using Xpert then negative using pDST were studied. DNA sequences and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) results provided insights for understanding discordant results. Results Of 26,826 patients with suggestive TB symptoms undergoing Xpert MTB/RIF testing, 728 diagnosed as RIF-resistant were evaluated. Of these, 118 (16.2%) exhibiting Xpert RIF resistance and phenotypic RIF susceptibility yielded 104 successfully subcultured isolates; of these, 86 (82.7%) harbored rpoB gene RRDR mutations and 18 (17.3%) did not. Leu511Pro (25.0%) and Leu533Pro (17.3%) mutants were most frequently associated with discordant RIF susceptibility test results. Of the 86 isolates with rpoB mutations, 42 (48.8%) with MICs ≤1.0 mg/L were assigned to the RIF-susceptible group, with Leu511Pro the most common mutation observed. Isolates with very low bacterial load were most frequently misdiagnosed as RIF-resistant by Xpert. Conclusion Approximately one-sixth of RIF-resistant TB isolates identified via Xpert yielded discordant pDST results due to questionable interpretation of specific “disputed” mutations. Thus, a diagnostic flow chart should be used to correctly interpret Xpert RIF-resistance results to best guide patient treatment.
... Indeed, it is possible that an optimized MGIT protocol may reduce the degree of overlap between MIC distributions and, therefore, the need for an ATU, as recently proposed for rifampin (26). Second, the current CC is used as a clinical breakpoint, as defined by EUCAST, even though pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical data have not been systematically assessed (e.g., it is possible that the current dose of PZA is not optimal even for strains that do not have elevated MICs or that a higher dose may compensate for modest MIC increases) (27,28). ...
Article
Full-text available
False susceptible phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) results for pyrazinamide due to mutations with MICs close to the critical concentration (CC) confound the classification of pncA resistance mutations, leading to an underestimate of the specificity of genotypic DST. This could be minimised by basing treatment decisions on well-understood mutations and by adopting an area of technical uncertainty for phenotypic DST rather than only testing the CC, as is current practice for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.
... [1][2][3][4] The array of reported and used molecular targets for Leishmania detection (kDNA, 18SrDNA, 7SLRNA, internal transcribed spacer [ITS], mini-exon, HSP70, GP63, and others) 1 and the number of amplification methods and parameters used in clinical and research laboratories (including definition of the amplification approach, selection of the visualization method, and definition of the reporting system and scale) limit the objective comparison, interpretation, and meta-analysis of studies and results. Unlike the standardized procedures developed and applied in clinical microbiology such as international protocols for minimal inhibitory concentration testing in bacteria, 5 the diversity of Leishmania detection tools restricts harmonization of methods for defining clinically relevant parameters such as drug susceptibility break points, relationships between parasite load and virulence, or the magnitude and impact of parasite persistence. ...
Article
Full-text available
Multiple PCR-based approaches have been developed for Leishmania detection in clinical and laboratory samples, and this diversity limits inter-study comparisons, meta-analyses, and generalization of findings. Toward the harmonization of a molecular tool for detection of Leishmania (Viannia) for research purposes, we evaluated the concordance of 18SrDNA qPCR and minicircle kinetoplastid DNA (mkDNA) PCR followed by Southern blot (PCR-SB) in in vitro infection systems and in lesion and mucosal swab samples from Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia). The lower limit of parasite detection of 18SrDNA qPCR and mkDNA PCR-SB was 10-1 promastigotes and one intracellular amastigote per reaction. From cutaneous lesions (n = 63), an almost perfect concordance was found between the methods (κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00). Despite equal limits of detection, mkDNA PCR-SB was more efficient for parasite detection in mucosal samples than 18SrDNA qPCR or 18SrDNA digital droplet PCR. The high concordance, sensitivity, scaling potential, and feasibility of implementation of the 18SrDNA qPCR support its selection as the L. (Viannia) in research laboratories as a first step toward harmonization of research protocols in the region.
... It would be in the interest of pharmaceutical companies to follow the EUCAST guidelines as early as possible during drug development to identify agents that may not be equally effective against major MTBC genotypes [53]. These antibiotics could either be abandoned or their development adjusted to gather evidence that genotypes with intrinsically elevated MICs are treatable at either standard or increased dosing (e.g. using nonclinical models or by choosing clinical trial sites in countries where these genotypes are sufficiently frequent to provide enough statistical power to study these questions comprehensively [54][55][56]). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: A comprehensive understanding of the pre-existing genetic variation in genes associated with antibiotic resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) is needed to accurately interpret whole-genome sequencing data for genotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Methods: We investigated mutations in 92 genes implicated in resistance to 21 anti-tuberculosis drugs using the genomes of 405 phylogenetically diverse MTBC strains. The role of phylogenetically informative mutations was assessed by routine phenotypic DST data for the first-line drugs isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide from a separate collection of over 7000 clinical strains. Selected mutations/strains were further investigated by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing. Results: Out of 547 phylogenetically informative mutations identified, 138 were classified as not correlating with resistance to first-line drugs. MIC testing did not reveal a discernible impact of a Rv1979c deletion shared by M. africanum lineage 5 strains on resistance to clofazimine. Finally, we found molecular evidence that some MTBC subgroups may be hyper-susceptible to bedaquiline and clofazimine by different loss-of-function mutations affecting a drug efflux pump subunit (MmpL5). Conclusions: Our findings underline that the genetic diversity in MTBC has to be studied more systematically to inform the design of clinical trials and to define sound epidemiologic cut-off values (ECOFFs) for new and repurposed anti-tuberculosis drugs. In that regard, our comprehensive variant catalogue provides a solid basis for the interpretation of mutations in genotypic as well as in phenotypic DST assays.
... Laboratories need to pay an annual signature to have access to the current version that is updated every year [1,2]. The EUCAST has been recognized at European level; it has been only 20 years and has emerged from the unification of several European reference institutions, which justifies its credibility and accessibility regarding the microbiology laboratories, once its content is available for free [3,4]. ...
Article
Antimicrobial resistance is a relevant "One Health" issue that shows the need of comparison of isolates of different origins. In this way, guidelines for antimicrobial-resistance evaluation in animals are relevant in relation to human sources. This work aims to compare antimicrobial-resistance results of animal isolates considering CLSI and EUCAST guidelines. The comparison shows considerable differences in the results, which include antibiotics used as primary options in hospital infections. EUCAST showed the higher number of samples with resistance profiles than CLSI that indicates a more efficient scenario to the EUCAST to screen antibiotic-resistant bacteria. EUCAST was more consonant to the expected phenotype for ESBL producers, with higher index of resistance to oxyimino-beta-lactam antibiotics. The study shows that there are differences in the interpretative results using different guidelines, where the susceptibility test results concerning Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin are not always coincident in CLSI and EUCAST. EUCAST has proved to be the most reliable alternative for profile screening of antibiotic resistance, when compared to CLSI. We might say the same with respect to the ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, in which EUCAST has proved to be more efficient about the demonstration of expected resistance profiles for the ESBL producers. These differences show that guideline selection might influence the therapeutic option.
... Both in vitro and in vivo, penicillins and clavulanic acid were efficacious at physiologically achievable concentrations 42 . In the absence of a clinical break point, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) break points can be used to infer susceptibility 43 . Previous studies have reported the successful use of penicillins and β-lactamase inhibitors for the treatment of MRSA in rabbits and rats, and for human infections 11,[44][45][46] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens threatens the future of modern medicine. One such resistant pathogen is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is resistant to nearly all β-lactam antibiotics, limiting treatment options. Here, we show that a significant proportion of MRSA isolates from different lineages, including the epidemic USA300 lineage, are susceptible to penicillins when used in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid. Susceptibility is mediated by a combination of two different mutations in the mecA promoter region that lowers mecA-encoded penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) expression, and in the majority of isolates by either one of two substitutions in PBP2a (E246G or M122I) that increase the affinity of PBP2a for penicillin in the presence of clavulanic acid. Treatment of S. aureus infections in wax moth and mouse models shows that penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitor susceptibility can be exploited as an effective therapeutic choice for ‘susceptible’ MRSA infection. Finally, we show that isolates with the PBP2a E246G substitution have a growth advantage in the presence of penicillin but the absence of clavulanic acid, which suggests that penicillin/β-lactamase susceptibility is an example of collateral sensitivity (resistance to one antibiotic increases sensitivity to another). Our findings suggest that widely available and currently disregarded antibiotics could be effective in a significant proportion of MRSA infections.
... breakpoints (Akrivopoulou et al., 2017) have also been used. Kahlmeter (2015) has recently suggested reaching an international consensus regarding AST in order to be able to report resistance in a comparable and reproducible way. Furthermore, there are obvious risks of overestimating resistance when guidelines are not followed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim The present study aims to determine the susceptibility of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans to amoxicillin by investigating a large collection of oral strains of diverse geographical origin. Methods Two hundred and fifty‐seven A. actinomycetemcomitans strains were serotyped using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction, and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of amoxicillin were determined using the agar dilution method (range 0.25 to 8.0 mg/L). The plates were spot‐wise inoculated with approximately 10⁴ colony‐forming units, incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 C°, and visually inspected after 24 and 48 hours. A MIC ≤ 2.00 mg/L was categorised as susceptible using EUCAST interpretative criteria for Haemophilus species. Results Amoxicillin MIC‐values varied from 0.25 mg/L to 2.00 mg/L, and all tested strains, including strains previously reported as resistant, were susceptible to amoxicillin. The MIC50 was 1.00 mg/L and the MIC90 was 2.00 mg/L. Conclusion Meticulous investigation of strains including isolates previously reported as resistant could not confirm the emergence of resistance to β‐lactams in A. actinomycetemcomitans. Based on the present in vitro results, amoxicillin can be considered a key oral antimicrobial agent for treatment of A. actinomycetemcomitans. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
... The choice of AST methodology assumes increasing importance given the growing international focus on AMR, with both systems recommended in the World Health Organization's Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) [2]. Although collaboration between CLSI and EUCAST has occurred, fundamental differences have so far precluded them from merging or harmonizing breakpoints [3]. ...
... The choice of AST methodology assumes increasing importance given the growing international focus on AMR, with both systems recommended in the World Health Organization's Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) [2]. Although collaboration between CLSI and EUCAST has occurred, fundamental differences have so far precluded them from merging or harmonizing breakpoints [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinical isolates is essential for guiding therapy as well as for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The two most commonly used methodologies worldwide are those of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). CLSI predominates in the United States and many regions outside Europe, where EUCAST is preferred. However, the global situation is evolving, with countries such as Australia recently switching to EUCAST [1].
... Etest was the most common methodology and GC agar base the most frequently used agar. In the last 5 years, there was a marked shift among participants to the use of EUCAST [17] breakpoints from the CLSI [16] breakpoints, most likely influenced by Euro-GASP and the publication of the EU case definitions in August 2012 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=OJ:L:2012:262:0001:0057:EN:PDF), which include definitions of antimicrobial resistance and state that EUCAST clinical breakpoints [17,18] should be adhered to. However, the lack of a recommended methodology for N. gonorrhoeae susceptibility testing by EUCAST might result in some laboratories continuing to use the CLSI breakpoints [16], which are inherently linked to the CLSI methodology, which may impact the interpretation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Confidence in any diagnostic and antimicrobial susceptibility testing data is provided by appropriate and regular quality assurance (QA) procedures. In Europe, the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Susceptibility Programme (Euro-GASP) has been monitoring the antimicrobial susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae since 2004. Euro-GASP includes an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme as an essential component for a quality-assured laboratory-based surveillance programme. Participation in the EQA scheme enables any problems with the performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing to be identified and addressed, feeds into the curricula of laboratory training organised by the Euro-GASP network, and assesses the capacity of individual laboratories to detect emerging new, rare and increasing antimicrobial resistance phenotypes. Participant performance in the Euro-GASP EQA scheme over a 10 year period (2007 to 2016, no EQA in 2013) was evaluated. Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility category and MIC results from the first 5 years (2007–2011) of the Euro-GASP EQA were compared with the latter 5 years (2012–2016). These time periods were selected to assess the impact of the 2012 European Union case definitions for the reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility. Results Antimicrobial susceptibility category agreement in each year was ≥91%. Discrepancies in susceptibility categories were generally because the MICs for EQA panel isolates were on or very close to the susceptibility or resistance breakpoints. A high proportion of isolates tested over the 10 years were within one (≥90%) or two (≥97%) MIC log2 dilutions of the modal MIC, respectively. The most common method used was Etest on GC agar base. There was a shift to using breakpoints published by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in the latter 5 years, however overall impact on the validity of results was limited, as the percentage categorical agreement and MIC concordance changed very little between the two five-year periods. Conclusions The high level of comparability of results in this EQA scheme indicates that high quality data are produced by the Euro-GASP participants and gives confidence in susceptibility and resistance data generated by laboratories performing decentralised testing.
... Terminology Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with phenotypic methods is based on the measurement of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) with the use of defined clinical breakpoints to categorize the test organism as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires an agreement on breakpoints and a rigorous standardization of methods and materials [13]. Standardization of methods and materials for antimicrobial agents used in therapy and prophylaxis is performed by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, EUCAST (http://www.eucast.org) in Europe, and by Clinical Laboratory Standard Institution, CLSI (http://clsi.org/ ...
Article
Full-text available
Potentially toxic metals (PTM), along with PTM-resistant bacteria and PTM-resistance genes, may be introduced into soil and water through sewage systems, direct excretion, land application of biosolids (organic matter recycled from sewage, especially for use in agriculture) or animal manures as fertilizers, and irrigation with wastewater or treated effluents. In this review article, we have evaluated whether the content of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (CrIII + CrVI), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) in soil and fertilizing products play a role in the development, spreading, and persistence of bacterial resistance to these elements, as well as cross- or co-resistance to antimicrobial agents. Several of the articles included in this review reported the development of resistance against PTM in both sewage and manure. Although PTM like As, Hg, Co, Cd, Pb, and Ni may be present in the fertilizing products, the concentration may be low since they occur due to pollution. In contrast, trace metals like Cu and Zn are actively added to animal feed in many countries. In several studies, several different bacterial species were shown to have a reduced susceptibility towards several PTM, simultaneously. However, neither the source of resistant bacteria nor the minimum co-selective concentration (MCC) for resistance induction are known. Co- or cross-resistance against highly important antimicrobials and critically important antimicrobials were identified in some of the bacterial isolates. This suggest that there is a genetic linkage or direct genetic causality between genetic determinants to these widely divergent antimicrobials, and metal resistance. Data regarding the routes and frequencies of transmission of AMR from bacteria of environmental origin to bacteria of animal and human origin were sparse. Due to the lack of such data, it is difficult to estimate the probability of development, transmission, and persistence of PTM resistance. Abbreviations: PTM: potentially toxic metals; AMR: antimicrobial resistance; ARG: antimicrobial resistance gene; MCC: minimum co-selective concentration; MDR: multidrug resistance; ARB: antimicrobial resistant bacteria; HGT: horizontal gene transfer; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration
... The CC corresponds to the ECOFF defined as the highest MIC of strains that are phenotypically susceptible and respond to therapy. 101,102 As absolute values, CC vary according to the media and protocols used for testing. 103,104 Very recently, the WHO has introduced a slightly different definition of CC. ...
Article
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is the deadliest infectious disease and the associated global threat has worsened with the emergence of drug resistance, in particular multidrug‐resistant TB (MDR‐TB) and extensively drug‐resistant TB (XDR‐TB). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) End‐TB Strategy advocates for universal access to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, this is not widely available and/or it is still underused. The majority of drug resistance in clinical MTB strains is attributed to chromosomal mutations. Resistance‐related mutations could also exert certain fitness cost to the drug‐resistant MTB strains and growth fitness could be restored by the presence of compensatory mutations. Understanding these underlying mechanisms could provide an important insight into TB pathogenesis and predict the future trend of MDR‐TB global pandemic. This review covers the mechanisms of resistance in MTB and provides a comprehensive overview of current phenotypic and molecular approaches for drug susceptibility testing, with particular attention to the methods endorsed and recommended by the WHO.
... Against 7,062 P. aeruginosa isolates collected globally (excluding the United States) in INFORM 2012 to 2014 (Fig. 1B), 92.0% were susceptible to ceftazidimeavibactam (MIC 90 , 8 mg/liter) (5); more recent analyses, including data from the United States, reported equivalent susceptibility rates (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Of note, 8 mg/liter is at the upper end of the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC distribution, which (as stated above) is an important attribute for the clinical breakpoint (12,35). ...
Article
Full-text available
Clinical susceptibility breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2000-500 mg every 8 hours (q8h) by 2-h intravenous infusion (adjusted for renal function) have been established by the FDA, CLSI and EUCAST as susceptible, MIC ≤8 mg/L, and resistant, MIC >8 mg/L. The key supportive data from PK/PD analyses, in vitro surveillance including molecular understanding of relevant resistance mechanisms, and efficacy in regulatory clinical trials, are collated and analyzed here.
... Indeed, in the current study, we observed that isolates with mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to RIF, STR, and EMB were reported susceptible according to MGIT, and MICs for these drugs were often around the critical concentration. These data support the notion of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) that critical concentrations should be defined by combining MIC distributions, preferably combined with clinical outcomes and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics data 28,29 . Even though WGS has already been successfully implemented in routine diagnostic practice in some settings and has been shown to achieve generally high agreement with phenotypic first-line DST 21,30,31 , MIC testing may help in more accurately assessing the performance of WGS for drug resistance detection and the role of this method in TB laboratory diagnosis. ...
Article
Full-text available
Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance poses a major threat to tuberculosis control. Current phenotypic tests for drug susceptibility are time-consuming, technically complex, and expensive. Whole genome sequencing is a promising alternative, though the impact of different drug resistance mutations on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) remains to be investigated. We examined the genomes of 72 phenotypically drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from 72 Romanian patients for drug resistance mutations. MICs for first- and second-line drugs were determined using the MycoTB microdilution method. These MICs were compared to macrodilution critical concentration testing by the Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) platform and correlated to drug resistance mutations. Sixty-three (87.5%) isolates harboured drug resistance mutations; 48 (66.7%) were genotypically multidrug-resistant. Different drug resistance mutations were associated with different MIC ranges; katG S315T for isoniazid, and rpoB S450L for rifampicin were associated with high MICs. However, several mutations such as in rpoB, rrs and rpsL, or embB were associated with MIC ranges including the critical concentration for rifampicin, aminoglycosides or ethambutol, respectively. Different resistance mutations lead to distinct MICs, some of which may still be overcome by increased dosing. Whole genome sequencing can aid in the timely diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance and guide clinical decision-making.
... Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for M. tuberculosis is typically performed at a single concentration ("critical concentration"), used in clinical routine as a breakpoint (BP) to separate susceptible from resistant isolates. This concentration corresponds to the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) which is the highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of strains that show phenotypical drug-susceptibility [14,15]. The ECOFF represents the most conservative BP by assuming that any MIC increase above that level results in reduced treatment efficacy on standard dosing. ...
Article
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), tuberculosis is the leading cause of death attributed to a single microbial pathogen worldwide. In addition to the large number of patients affected by tuberculosis, the emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug‐resistance is complicating tuberculosis control in many high‐burden countries. During the past five years, the global number of patients identified with multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis (MDR‐TB), defined as bacillary resistance at least against rifampicin and isoniazid, the two most active drugs in a treatment regimen, has increased by more than 20 percent annually. Today we experience a historical peak in the number of patients affected by MDR‐TB. The management of MDR‐TB is characterized by delayed diagnosis, uncertainty of the extent of bacillary drug‐resistance, imprecise standardized drug regimens and dosages, very long duration of therapy and high frequency of adverse events which all translate into a poor prognosis for many of the affected patients. Major scientific and technological advances in recent years provide new perspectives through treatment regimens tailor‐made to individual needs. Where availale, such personalized treatment has major implications on the treatment outcomes of patients with MDR‐TB. The challenge now is to bring these adances to those patients that need them most. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
... The upper end of the WT distribution (the highest MIC for isolates devoid of phenotypically detectable resistance) is defined as the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF). 11,12 Under strict standard conditions strain-to-strain differences belonging to the WT can sometimes be determined. In one laboratory, under standard conditions, the reproducibility of the test is better, most likely because part of the variation in phenotype is better controlled, as explained above. ...
Article
Over recent decades, several publications have described optimization procedures for antibiotic therapy in the individual patient based on antimicrobial MIC values. Most methods include therapeutic drug monitoring and use a single MIC determination plus the relevant pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics to adjust the dose to optimize antimicrobial drug exposure and antibacterial effects. However, the use of an MIC obtained by a single MIC determination is inappropriate. First, routine clinical laboratories cannot determine MICs with sufficient accuracy to guide dosage owing to the inherent assay variation in the MIC test. Second, the variation in any MIC determination, whatever method is used, must be accounted for. If dose adjustments are made based on therapeutic drug monitoring and include MIC determinations, MIC variation must be considered to prevent potential underdosing of patients. We present the problems and some approaches that could be used in clinical practice.
... The necessary criteria for the estimation of an ECVs were recently described by Kalhmeter et al. [46], among which the following stand out: (1) the ECV must be species specific and molecular and/or MALDI-TOF identification plays an important role, since many pathogens represent species complexes (such as the case of C. neoformans, for example) that cannot be identified by conventional tests; (2) the MICs must be identified by reference methods (CLSI or EUCAST); (3) the data must be generated by multicenter studies that include several geographic regions; (4) the data should come from unique clinical isolates. These criteria have been reviewed and analyzed by other researchers [44••, 45••]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to provide a current view of the importance of the determination and use of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for Cryptococcus neoformans, since there are no clinical breakpoints (CBPs). Recent Findings ECVs have been proposed for some antifungal agents and C. neoformans, using standardized methodologies by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and by the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), based on the distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). There is no sufficient evidence for the determination of ECVs for C. neoformans using commercial methods; however, as these methods are routinely used in the microbiology laboratory, it is recommended for the establishment of local ECVs using these methods and following the criteria for their determination. Summary Due to the geographic and genetic variations inherent to C. neoformans, it is important to calculate ECVs, since they are useful in clinical practice to guide therapy in the absence of CBPs.
Article
A growing body of literature has marked the emergence and spread of antifungal resistance among species of Trichophyton , the most prevalent cause of toenail and fingernail onychomycosis in the United States and Europe. We review published data on rates of oral antifungal resistance among Trichophyton species; causes of antifungal resistance and methods to counteract it; and in vitro data on the role of topical antifungals in the treatment of onychomycosis. Antifungal resistance among species of Trichophyton against terbinafine and itraconazole—the two most common oral treatments for onychomycosis and other superficial fungal infections caused by dermatophytes—has been detected around the globe. Fungal adaptations, patient characteristics (e.g., immunocompromised status; drug–drug interactions), and empirical diagnostic and treatment patterns may contribute to reduced antifungal efficacy and the development of antifungal resistance. Antifungal stewardship efforts aim to ensure proper antifungal use to limit antifungal resistance and improve clinical outcomes. In the treatment of onychomycosis, critical aspects of antifungal stewardship include proper identification of the fungal infection prior to initiation of treatment and improvements in physician and patient education. Topical ciclopirox, efinaconazole and tavaborole, delivered either alone or in combination with oral antifungals, have demonstrated efficacy in vitro against susceptible and/or resistant isolates of Trichophyton species, with low potential for development of antifungal resistance. Additional real‐world long‐term data are needed to monitor global rates of antifungal resistance and assess the efficacy of oral and topical antifungals, alone or in combination, in counteracting antifungal resistance in the treatment of onychomycosis.
Article
The characterization of wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and zone diameter distributions with the setting of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs or ECVs) provides a reference for the otherwise relative MIC values in the international system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Distributions of MIC values for a species and an agent follow a log-normal distribution, which in the absence of resistance mechanisms is monomodal and designated wild type (WT). The upper end of the WT distribution, the ECOFF, can be identified with statistical methods. In the presence of phenotypically detectable resistance, the distribution has at least one more mode (the non-WT), but despite this, the WT is most often identifiable using the same methods. The ECOFF provides the most sensitive measure of resistance development in a species against an agent. The WT and non-WT modes are independent of the organism´s response to treatment, but when the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) determines the clinical breakpoints, the committee avoids breakpoints that split WT distributions of target species. This is to avoid the poorer reproducibility of susceptibility categorization when breakpoints split major populations but also because the EUCAST has failed to identify different clinical outcomes for isolates with different MIC values inside the wild-type distribution. In laboratory practice, the ECOFF is used to screen for and exclude resistance and allows the comparison of resistance between systems with different breakpoints from different breakpoint organizations, breakpoints evolving over time, and different breakpoints between human and animal medicine. The EUCAST actively encourages colleagues to question MIC distributions as presented on the website ( https://www.eucast.org/mic_and_zone_distributions_and_ecoffs ) and to contribute MIC and inhibition zone diameter data.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Breakpoints provided by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are now being used in many countries. This study was planned to ascertain the agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and EUCAST breakpoints during the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Clinical isolates belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae recovered between January and December, 2022, were included in the analysis. The diameter of the zone of inhibition of the 14 antimicrobials (viz. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefixime, aztreonam, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fosfomycin) was analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was interpreted using CLSI 2022 and EUCAST 2022 guidelines. Results: Susceptibility data from a total of 356 isolates showed a slight increase in the percentage of resistant isolates with most of the drugs using EUCAST guidelines. The level of agreement varied from almost perfect to slight. For two drugs, i.e., fosfomycin and cefazolin, the agreement was least among the drug analysed (kappa (κ) value < 0.5, p < 0.001). For Ceftriaxone and Aztreonam, with EUCAST, susceptible (S) isolates would have been categorised in the newly redefined "I" category. It would have indicated the use of higher dosages of drugs. Conclusion: Change in the breakpoints impacts the interpretation of the susceptibility. It can also lead to a change in the dosage of the drug used for treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to see the impact of recent modifications "I" category of EUCAST on the clinical outcome and usage of antimicrobials.
Introduction: The importance of antibiotic treatment for sepsis in critically ill septic patients is well established. Consistently achieving the dose of antibiotic required to optimally kill bacteria, minimize the development of resistance, and avoid toxicity is challenging. The increasing understanding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of antibiotics, and the effects of critical illness on key PK/PD parameters, is gradually re-shaping how antibiotics are dosed in critically ill patients. Areas covered: The PK/PD characteristics of commonly used carbapenem antibiotics, the principles of the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and current as well as future methods of utilizing TDM to optimally devise dosing regimens will be reviewed. The limitations, and evidence-base supporting the use of carbapenem TDM to improve outcomes in critically ill patients will be examined. Expert opinion: It is important to understand the principles of TDM in order to correctly inform dosing regimens. Although the concept of TDM is attractive, and the ability to utilize PK software to optimize dosing in the near future is expected to rapidly increase clinicians' ability to meet pre-defined PK/PD targets more accurately, current evidence provides only limited support for the use of TDM to guide carbapenem dosing in critically ill patients.
Article
Full-text available
Beta-aryl keto hexanoic acids (5a-l) were synthesized efficiently, followed by esterification that afforded beta-aryl keto methylhexanoates (6a-l). The chemo-selective ketoxime beta-aryl methyl hexanoates (7a-l) were isolated in good yields. Spectroscopic methods were used to characterize the obtained moieties. The antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties of the effectively synthesized compounds 7a-l were also investigated. The anti-inflammatory activity of the compounds 7c, 7f, 7i, and 7l was excellent, with a low IC50 value at micromolar concentration, which was much better than the reference diclofenac. All synthesized compounds 7a-l were assessed for their in vitro antibacterial activity against S. aureus, B. subtilis and E. coli. Most of the compounds exhibited promising activity against Gram-positive bacterial strain, compound 7i showed excellent activity compared to standard streptomycin and in the case of E. coli, compounds 7b, 7c, 7j, 7k and 7l have shown moderate activity. Further, the cytotoxic activities of the compounds were assessed against lung cancer cells (A549) by using MTT assay. The possible interaction mechanism of the molecules 7c and 7g with Gram-negative strain E. coli DNA gyrase B in complex with PDB ID: 4DUH was studied.
Article
Background and aims: As with other infectious diseases, Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens should be guided by susceptibility testing to achieve excellent success rate, especially in the era of high antibiotic resistance. However, susceptibility testing for H. pylori is rarely performed, which can be partly ascribed to the current lack of standardization of testing methods and the lack of unified consensus on the antibiotic resistance breakpoints. The aim of this review was to call for an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori susceptibility testing. Methods: We summarize and compare the advantages and disadvantages of four different phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods (agar dilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution) and the molecular susceptibility testing method for H. pylori. Results: The standard phenotypic testing methods and the molecular testing methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Compared to the standard phenotypic methods, the molecular testing method does not require successful H. pylori culture, and therefore, is much more rapid and convenient for clinical use. However, the currently available molecular testing method is only suitable for detecting clarithromycin and quinolone susceptibility profiles in H. pylori. Although the standard AST is time-consuming, it is currently the only way to test the susceptibility of H. pylori to all the commonly used antibiotics. Conclusion: To make H. pylori susceptibility testing become a clinical routine, an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori AST is needed. Future efforts are needed for optimizing broth culture of H. pylori, and developing commercial AST plates for achieving high throughput and automated susceptibility testing for H. pylori.
Thesis
Dans le monde entier l’antibiorésistance des entérobactérales communautaires, notamment par production de ß-lactamase à spectre étendu (E-BLSE), conduit à une consommation préoccupante d’antibiotique de dernier recours tels les carbapénèmes. Dérivé de la ticarcilline la témocilline pourrait représentée une alternative y compris sur certaines entérobactérales productrices de carbapénèmase (EPC). Néanmoins, il existe une incertitude concernant les concentrations critiques distinguant les entérobactérales sensibles des résistantes avec trois valeurs selon les pays utilisateurs de témocilline (8 mg/L, 16 mg/L ou 32 mg/L) tandis qu’une harmonisation internationale reste en attente. En ce contexte trois travaux originaux ont été poursuivi ainsi qu’une revue de la littérature. Il fut d’abord étudié in vitro la sensibilité à la témocilline de 762 entérobactérales responsables d’infection urinaire communautaire. Dans un contexte de prévalence faible des E-BLSE (5%) et nulle des EPC, les trois méthodes de routine (disque, automate, Etest) se sont révélées très fiables, la borne épidémiologique pour la témocilline s’établissant à 8 mg/L. Ensuite, l’efficacité de la témocilline vis-à-vis d’entérobactérales productrices ou non de ßlactamases (E-BLSE ou EPC) a été évaluée dans deux modèles murins complémentaires. Il a été montré l’efficacité de la témocilline à un schéma reproduisant la posologie humaine de 2 g toutes 12 h vis-à-vis d’entérobactérales pour lesquels la CMI de la témocilline était de 8 mg/L. L’efficacité de ce schéma posologique, bien que significative, était moindre vis-à-vis des isolats pour lesquels la CMI de la témocilline était de 16 mg/L. Par contre, il ne fut pas observé d’efficacité significative de la témocilline vis-à-vis des isolats avec une CMI à 32 mg/L quelques soit le schéma posologique (2 g toutes les 8 ou 12 h). L’ensemble de ces résultats, ainsi qu’une revue exhaustive des données de la littérature, conduisent à proposer une concentration critique de 8 mg/L pour le schéma posologique de 2 g toutes les 12 h, et de 16 mg/L pour celui de 2 g toutes les 8h. Cette dernière proposition correspondrait au « sensible à forte exposition », nouvelle définition de la catégorisation « intermédiaire » selon les dernières recommandations de l’EUCAST.
Article
Full-text available
The ST131 multilocus sequence type (MLST) of Escherichia coli is a globally successful pathogen whose dissemination is increasing rates of antibiotic resistance. Numerous global surveys have demonstrated the pervasiveness of this clone; in some regions ST131 accounts for up to 30% of all E. coli isolates. However, many regions are underrepresented in these published surveys, including Africa, South America, and Asia. We collected consecutive bloodstream E. coli isolates from three countries in Southeast Asia; ST131 was the most common MLST type. As in other studies, the C2/H30Rx clade accounted for the majority of ST131 strains. Clinical risk factors were similar to other reported studies. However, we found that nearly all of the C2 strains in this study were closely related, forming what we denote the SEA-C2 clone. The SEA-C2 clone is enriched for strains from Asia, particularly Southeast Asia and Singapore. The SEA-C2 clone accounts for all of the excess resistance and virulence of ST131 relative to non-ST131 E. coli. The SEA-C2 strains appear to be locally circulating and dominant in Southeast Asia, despite the intuition that high international connectivity and travel would enable frequent opportunities for other strains to establish themselves.
Article
Full-text available
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) was established to harmonise clinical antimicrobial breakpoints and to define breakpoints for new agents in Europe. Data from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) external quality assessment (EQA) exercises from 2009 to 2012, from the United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) from November 2009 to March 2013 and data collected by EUCAST through a questionnaire in the first quarter of 2013 were analysed to investigate implementation of EUCAST guidelines in Europe. A rapid change to use of EUCAST breakpoints was observed over time. Figures for implementation of EUCAST breakpoints at the end of the studied period were 61.2% from EARSNet data and 73.2% from UK NEQAS data. Responses to the EUCAST questionnaire indicated that EUCAST breakpoints were used by over 50% of laboratories in 18 countries, by 10 to 50% of laboratories in eight countries and by less than 10% in seven countries. The EUCAST disk diffusion method was used by more than 50% of laboratories in 12 countries, by 10 to 50% of laboratories in ten countries and by less than 10% in eleven countries. EUCAST guidelines implementation is essential to ensure consistent clinical reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility results and antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates is essential for clinical diagnosis, to detect emerging problems and to guide empirical treatment. Current phenotypic procedures are sometimes associated with mistakes and may require further genetic testing. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) may soon be within reach even for routine surveillance and clinical diagnostics. The aim of this study was to evaluate WGS as a routine tool for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance compared with current phenotypic procedures. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed on 200 isolates originating from Danish pigs, covering four bacterial species. Genomic DNA was purified from all isolates and sequenced as paired-end reads on the Illumina platform. The web servers ResFinder and MLST (www.genomicepidemiology.org) were used to identify acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and MLST types (where MLST stands for multilocus sequence typing). ResFinder results were compared with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using EUCAST epidemiological cut-off values and MLST types. Results: A total of 3051 different phenotypic tests were performed; 482 led to the categorizing of isolates as resistant and 2569 as susceptible. Seven cases of disagreement between tested and predicted susceptibility were observed, six of which were related to spectinomycin resistance in Escherichia coli. Correlation between MLST type and resistance profiles was only observed in Salmonella Typhimurium, where isolates belonging to sequence type (ST) 34 were more resistant than ST19 isolates. Conclusions: High concordance (99.74%) between phenotypic and predicted antimicrobial susceptibility was observed. Thus, antimicrobial resistance testing based on WGS is an alternative to conventional phenotypic methods.
Article
Full-text available
Clinical breakpoints are used in clinical microbiology laboratories to categorize microorganisms as clinically susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) dependent on the quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility as indicated by the MIC value determined in a well-defined standard test system. The laboratory report, with the designations of S, I or R for each antimicrobial agent, provides guidance to clinicians with respect to the potential use of agents in the treatment of patients, and clinical breakpoints should therefore distinguish between patients that are likely or unlikely to respond to antimicrobial treatment. In Europe, clinical breakpoints are set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), following a defined procedure. This includes evaluation of efficacy in experimental settings and clinical studies to derive pharmacodynamic targets such as the fAUC/MIC ratio or %fT > MIC required for efficacy, the pharmacokinetic properties of the agent, Monte Carlo simulations to estimate exposures of the antimicrobial agent in the target patient population and commonly used dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment is subsequently determined for a range of pharmacodynamic targets and the results from the Monte Carlo simulations. The breakpoints derived are subsequently evaluated with respect to the wild-type population of the target microorganisms, specific resistance mechanisms and other relevant data. In this paper, we provide an overview of the EUCAST process and considerations for setting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints. These are the breakpoints that in the EUCAST breakpoint tables are referred to as 'non-species-related breakpoints'.
Article
Full-text available
Clin Microbiol Infect EUCAST expert rules have been developed to assist clinical microbiologists and describe actions to be taken in response to specific antimicrobial susceptibility test results. They include recommendations on reporting, such as inferring susceptibility to other agents from results with one, suppression of results that may be inappropriate, and editing of results from susceptible to intermediate or resistant or from intermediate to resistant on the basis of an inferred resistance mechanism. They are based on current clinical and/or microbiological evidence. EUCAST expert rules also include intrinsic resistance phenotypes and exceptional resistance phenotypes, which have not yet been reported or are very rare. The applicability of EUCAST expert rules depends on the MIC breakpoints used to define the rules. Setting appropriate clinical breakpoints, based on treating patients and not on the detection of resistance mechanisms, may lead to modification of some expert rules in the future.
Article
Full-text available
Normalized resistance interpretation (NRI) utilizes the fact that the wild-type population on the sensitive side is not affected by resistance development, and therefore a normalized reconstruction of the peak can be performed. The method was modified for MIC distributions by the introduction of helper variables, in-between values assigned the mean of the neighboring numbers of isolates. This method was used on Staphylo- coccus aureus and Escherichia coli MIC distributions for 27 antimicrobials each and obtained from the EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) website (http://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions/). The number of isolates in each of the 54 distributions ranged from 40 to 124,472. NRI produced normalized distributions in all cases. Cutoff values were calculated for +2.0 and +2.5 standard deviations (SD) above the means and then rounded up to nearest regular MIC dilution step. EUCAST also show cutoff values, ECOFF values, which were used as the reference. The NRI generated +2.0 SD values showed the best agreement with 26 of 27 within ±1 dilution step and 17 exactly on the ECOFF values for Staphylococcus aureus, and 25 of 27 within ±1 dilution step and 14 right on the ECOFF values for Escherichia coli. NRI offers an objective method for the reconstruction of the wild-type population in an MIC distribution for a given bacterial species and an antimicrobial agent. This method offers a new tool in comparative susceptibility studies such as global surveillance of resistance, as well as in quality control in individual laboratories.
Article
Full-text available
The aminoglycosides and cyclic polypeptides are essential drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, underscoring the need for accurate and reproducible drug susceptibility testing (DST). The epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) separating wild-type susceptible strains from non-wild-type strains is an important but rarely used tool for indicating susceptibility breakpoints against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this study, we established wild-type MIC distributions on Middlebrook 7H10 medium for amikacin, kanamycin, streptomycin, capreomycin, and viomycin using 90 consecutive clinical isolates and 21 resistant strains. Overall, the MIC variation between and within runs did not exceed +/-1 MIC dilution step, and validation of MIC values in Bactec 960 MGIT demonstrated good agreement. Tentative ECOFFs defining the wild type were established for all investigated drugs, including amikacin and viomycin, which currently lack susceptibility breakpoints for 7H10. Five out of seven amikacin- and kanamycin-resistant isolates were classified as susceptible to capreomycin according to the current critical concentration (10 mg/liter) but were non-wild type according to the ECOFF (4 mg/liter), suggesting that the critical concentration may be too high. All amikacin- and kanamycin-resistant isolates were clearly below the ECOFF for viomycin, and two of them were below the ECOFF for streptomycin, indicating that these two drugs may be considered for treatment of amikacin-resistant strains. Pharmacodynamic indices (peak serum concentration [Cmax]/MIC) were more favorable for amikacin and viomycin compared to kanamycin and capreomycin. In conclusion, our data emphasize the importance of establishing wild-type MIC distributions for improving the quality of drug susceptibility testing against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Article
Full-text available
The fluconazole MIC distributions for Candida glabrata from testing 34 different clinical isolates and performing 51 tests on a single isolate mirrored each other. Since what is perceived as biological variation in isolates without resistance mechanisms is mainly methodological variation, breakpoints which divide this distribution not only lack a sound biological basis but also result in poor reproducibility of susceptibility characterization. This makes 2, 4, 8, and possibly 16 μg/ml unsuitable breakpoints for C. glabrata and fluconazole.
Article
With the support of ESCMID and European countries, EUCAST has developed a disk diffusion test with zone diameter breakpoints correlated with the EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints. The development of the EUCAST disk diffusion method and quality control criteria are described, together with guidance on quality control and implementation of the method in clinical microbiology laboratories. The method includes the use of Mueller-Hinton agar without supplements for non-fastidious organisms and with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood and 20 mg/L β-NAD for fastidious organisms, a standardized inoculum resulting in confluent growth, an incubation time of 16-20 h, a reading guide on how to read zone diameters on individual species-agent combinations and zone diameter breakpoints calibrated to the EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints. EUCAST recommendations are described in detail and updated regularly on the EUCAST website (http://www.eucast.org).
Article
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) began harmonizing clinical breakpoints in Europe 2002. In 2009, work to develop a disk diffusion method began and the first disk diffusion breakpoints calibrated to EUCAST clinical minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints were published in December 2009. In this study we validated EUCAST clinical zone diameter breakpoints vs. the International Standard Organization (ISO) reference broth microdilution. A collection of 544 isolates (238 Gram-negative and 306 Gram-positive) were tested against a panel of antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with broth microdilution as described by ISO and disk diffusion in accordance with EUCAST methodology. Inhibition zone diameters and MIC values were interpreted and categorized (S, I and R) according to EUCAST clinical breakpoint table version 2.0. Categorical agreement (CA) as well as minor (mD), major (MD) and very major (VMD) discrepancies were determined. There was in general good correlation between susceptibility test results obtained with disk diffusion and broth microdilution. Overall CA was 97.3% for all combinations of organisms and antimicrobial agents (n=5231) and the overall discrepancy rates were 110 (2.1%) mD, 24 (0.5%) MD and 7 (0.1%) VMD. The overall CA for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were 98.7% (2346 tests) and 96.2% (2942 tests), respectively. Seven VMD was observed, five for Gram-positive organisms (coagulase negative staphylcocci (n=2) and Staphylococcus aureus (n=3)) and two for Gram-negative organisms (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Minor discrepancies were mainly observed in Gram-negatives and were related to different antimicrobial agents and species. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
In the present study, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of 97 Escherichia coli isolates from birds, and 100 clinical isolates from blood cultures, were determined by disk diffusion. The wild-type distributions were defined by the normalized resistance interpretation method. It is shown that the avian and clinical inhibition zone diameter distributions of wild-type E. coli are indistinguishable. © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
Article
To evaluate a calibration method for disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility tests, using zone diameter values generated in the individual laboratory as the internal calibrator for combinations of antibiotic and bacterial species. The high-zone side of zone histogram distributions was first analyzed by moving averages to determine the peak position of the susceptible population. The accumulated percentages of isolates for the high zone diameter values were calculated and converted into probit values. The normal distribution of the ideal population of susceptible strains was then determined by using the least-squares method for probit values against zone diameters, and the ideal population was thereby defined, including mean and standard deviation. Zone diameter values were obtained from laboratories at the Karolinska Hospital (KS) and Växjö Hospital (VX), and from two laboratories (LabA, LabB) in Argentina. The method relies on well standardized disk tests, but is independent of differences in MIC limits and zone breakpoints, and does not require the use of reference strains. Resistance was tentatively set at below 3 SD from the calculated, ideal mean zone diameter of the susceptible population. The method, called normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance, was tested on results from the KS and VX clinical microbiology laboratories, using the disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and for two bacterial species, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In total, 114 217 test results were included for the clinical isolates, and 3582 test results for control strains. The methodology at KS and VX followed the standard of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Zone diameter histograms for control strains were first analyzed to validate the procedure, and a comparison of actual means with the calculated means showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.998. Results for clinical isolates at the two laboratories showed an excellent agreement for 54 of 57 combinations of antibiotic and bacterial species between normalized interpretations and the interpretations given by the laboratories. There were difficulties with E. coli and mecillinam, and S. aureus and tetracycline and rifampicin. The method was also tested on results from two laboratories using the NCCLS standard, and preliminary results showed very good agreement with quality-controlled laboratory interpretations. The normalized resistance interpretation offers a new approach to comparative surveillance studies whereby the inhibition zone diameter results from disk tests in clinical laboratories can be used for calibration of the test.
Article
MIC distribution data were obtained from a variety of international sources, and pooled after selection by a defined criterion. Sixty-seven of these datasets were subjected to a range of statistical goodness-of-fit tests. The log-normal distribution was selected for subsequent modelling. Cumulative counts of MIC distribution data were fitted to the cumulative log-normal distribution using non-linear least squares regression for a range of data subsets from each antibiotic-bacterium combination. Estimated parameters in the regression were the number of isolates in the subset, and (the log(2) values of) the mean and standard deviation. Optimum fits for the cumulative log-normal curve were then used to determine the wild-type MIC range, determined by calculating the MICs associated with the lower and upper 0.1% of the distribution, rounding to the nearest two-fold dilution, and calculating the probabilities of values higher and lower than these values. When plotted logarithmically, histograms of MIC frequencies appeared normal (Gaussian), but standard goodness-of-fit tests showed that the two-fold dilution grouping of MICs fits poorly to a log-normal distribution, whereas non-linear regression gave good fits to population (histogram) log-normal distributions of log(2) MIC frequencies, and even better fits to log-normal cumulative distributions. Optimum fits were found when the difference between the estimated and true number of isolates in the fitted subset was minimal. Sixteen antibiotic-bacterium datasets were fitted using this technique, and the log(2) values of the means and standard deviations were used to determine the 0.1% and 99.9% wild-type cut-off values. When rounded to the nearest two-fold dilution, > or = 98.5% of MIC values fall within the cut-off value range. Non-linear regression fitting to a cumulative log-normal distribution is a novel and effective method for modelling MIC distributions and quantifying wild-type MIC ranges.
Article
It has long been acknowledged that the cephalosporin breakpoints used in most European countries and the USA fail to detect many or most extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in Enterobacteriaceae and that all ESBLs are clinically significant. Therefore, microbiological laboratories have undertaken not only regular cephalosporin susceptibility tests based on breakpoints, but also special tests to detect all ESBLs. An increasing accumulation of clinical data implies that the clinical success of third generation cephalosporin therapy is related more to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) than to the presence or absence of an ESBL. However, the breakpoints must be lower than those previously recommended by many breakpoint committees. In Europe, this adjustment has been achieved by EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) through the ongoing process of harmonising European breakpoints. In the USA, the CLSI recently voted to adopt similar guidelines but are waiting to implement these while revising other beta-lactam breakpoints. As Enterobacteriaceae are becoming increasingly resistant, a less 'diehard' interpretation of the relationship among MICs, ESBLs and clinical outcome may provide therapeutic alternatives in difficult situations.
Subcommittee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms and Specific Resistances of Clinical and/or Epidemiological Importance. EUCAST Guidelines for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms And Specific Resistances of Clinical and/or Epidemiological Importance, Version 1.0
  • C Giske
Giske C and the EUCAST Subcommittee for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms and Specific Resistances of Clinical and/or Epidemiological Importance. EUCAST Guidelines for Detection of Resistance Mechanisms And Specific Resistances of Clinical and/or Epidemiological Importance, Version 1.0, December 2013. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/ PDFs/EUCAST_files/Resistance_mechanisms/EUCAST_detection_of_ resistance_mechanisms_v1.0_20131211.pdf.
Escherichia coli vs Cefotaxime MICs (Accepted Distributions on Updates at
  • Eucast
  • Database
18 EUCAST Database: Escherichia coli vs. Cefotaxime MICs (Accepted Distributions on 10 April 2015). Updates at: http://mic.eucast.org/ Eucast2/regShow.jsp?Id=3217.