Julia Skinner's research while affiliated with University of Birmingham and other places

Epstein-Barr virus, a human gammaherpesvirus, possesses a unique set of latent genes whose constitutive expression in B cells leads to cell growth transformation. The initiation of this growth transforming infection depends on a viral promoter in BamHI W (Wp) whose regulation is poorly understood. Using Wp reporter constructs in in vitro transfection assays, we found that Wp was 11- to 190-fold more active in B cell than in non-B cell lines and that three regions of the promoter (termed UAS1, UAS2, and UAS3) contributed to transcriptional activation. The upstream regions UAS3 (-1168 to -440) and UAS2 (-352 to -264) both functioned in a cell lineage-independent manner and were together responsible for the bulk of Wp activity in non-B cells; mutational analysis indicated the importance of a YY1 binding site in UAS2 in that context. By contrast, UAS1 (-140 to -87) was B cell specific and was the key determinant of the promoter's increased activity in B cell lines. Mutational analysis of UAS1 sequences combined with in vitro bandshift assays revealed the presence of three binding sites for cellular factors in this region. When mutations that abolished factor binding in bandshift assays were introduced into a Wp reporter construct, the loss of any one of the three UAS1 binding sites was sufficient to reduce promoter activity by 10- to 30-fold in B cells. From sequence analysis, two of these appear to be novel transcription factor binding sites, whereas the third was identified as a cyclic AMP response element (CRE). Our data indicate that this CRE interacts with CREB and ATF1 proteins present in B cell nuclear extracts and that this interaction is important for Wp activity.

In Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B lymphoblastoid and many Burkitt lymphoma cell lines, the EBV EBNA-1 protein is one of six viral nuclear antigens expressed from a common transcription unit under the control of one of two promoters, Wp or Cp. In contrast, EBNA-1 is the only EBV nuclear antigen expressed in Burkitt and other EBV-positive tumors. We previously identified a promoter of EBNA-1 transcription, designated Fp, in early-passage Mutu Burkitt tumor cells, and this promoter is also active in long-term Mutu and Akata Burkitt cell lines which maintain the exclusive expression of EBNA-1 characteristic of the tumor. However, transcription initiation within Fp reporter gene plasmids in EBV-negative cells occurs at positions 100 to 200 bases downstream of the Fp start site in the BamHI-Q restriction fragment. Here we demonstrate that transcription initiation within newly established Burkitt lymphoma cell lines is consistent with the transcription initiation we observed in reporter plasmids. Furthermore, previous observations of transcription from Fp to generate EBNA-1 transcripts can be attributed to lytic-cycle gene expression. These data, in conjunction with our previous characterization of promoter regulatory elements, define a fourth EBNA-1 promoter, Qp, that is active in latently infected Burkitt tumor cells.

An influence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response over Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) evolution was first suggested by the finding that virus isolates from highly HLA-A11-positive Oriental populations were specifically mutated in two immunodominant A11-restricted CTL epitopes. Here we turn to a second HLA allele, B35.01 and show that B35.01-restricted CTL responses in Caucasian donors reproducibly map to a single peptide epitope, YPLHEQHGM, representing residues 458-466 of the type 1 EBV nuclear antigen 3A protein (B95.8 strain). In this case, however, most EBV isolates from a highly B35.01-positive population (in The Gambia) either retained the CTL epitope sequence or carried a mutation (P-->S at position 2) which conserved antigenicity; changes leading to reduced antigenicity (Y-->N at position 1) were found in only a minority of cases. Furthermore, CTL recognizing the YPLHEQHGM epitope could be reactivated from the blood of some B35.01-positive Gambian donors by in vitro stimulation with the synthetic peptide, indicating that epitope-specific immunity does exist in this population. Possible differences between the A11-based and B35.01-based studies are discussed.