ArticlePDF Available

Determinants of carriage of resistant Escherichia coli in the Indonesian population inside and outside hospitals

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide healthcare problem exacerbated by antibiotic use and transmission of resistant bacteria. Not much is known about resistance in commensal flora and about determinants for resistance in Indonesia. This study analysed recent antibiotic use as well as demographic, socioeconomic, disease-related and healthcare-related determinants of rectal carriage of resistant Escherichia coli in the community and in hospitals in Indonesia. Carriers of susceptible E. coli were compared with carriers of E. coli with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which variables were associated with carriage of resistant E. coli. Individuals in the community with varying levels of contact with healthcare institutions and hospitalized patients were analysed as separate populations. Of 3275 individuals (community 2494, hospital 781), 54% carried resistant E. coli. Recent antibiotic use was the most important determinant of resistance in both populations [community: odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5-2.3; hospital: OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.9]. In the community, hospitalization (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0-3.0), diarrhoeal symptoms (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and age under 16 years (adults: OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5) were associated with carriage of resistant E. coli. For hospitalized patients, having no health insurance was associated with less resistance (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) and differences were observed between hospitals (Semarang: OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.3) and departments (Paediatrics: OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.7-10.7). Further research is needed to investigate whether transmission is responsible for these differences.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Determinants of carriage of resistant Escherichia coli in the
Indonesian population inside and outside hospitals
D. Offra Duerink
1
*, Endang S. Lestari
2
, Usman Hadi
3
, Nico J. D. Nagelkerke
4
, Julie
¨
tte A. Severin
5
,
Henri A. Verbrugh
5
, Monique Keuter
6
, Inge C. Gyssens
5
and Peterhans J. van den Broek
1
on behalf
of the study group ‘Antimicrobial Resistance in Indonesia: Prevalence and Prevention’ (AMRIN)†
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The
Netherlands;
2
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Dr Kariadi Hospital—School of Medicine, Diponegoro
University, Jalan Dr Soetomo 16-18, Semarang 50231, Indonesia;
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Dr Soetomo
Hospital—School of Medicine, Airlangga University, Jalan Prof. Dr Moestopo 6-8, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia;
4
Department of Community Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 17666, Al Ain, United Arab
Emirates;
5
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Rotterdam,
‘s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
6
Department of Internal Medicine, Nijmegen
University Centre for Infectious Diseases International Health (NUCI-IH), Geert Grooteplein 10, 456, 6525 GA
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Received 19 February 2007; returned 11 March 2007; revised 1 May 2007; accepted 7 May 2007
Objectives: Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide healthcare problem exacerbated by antibiotic use and
transmission of resistant bacteria. Not much is known about resistance in commensal flora and about
determinants for resistance in Indonesia. This study analysed recent antibiotic use as well as demo-
graphic, socioeconomic, disease-related and healthcare-related determinants of rectal carriage of
resistant Escherichia coli in the community and in hospitals in Indonesia.
Methods: Carriers of susceptible E. coli were compared with carriers of E. coli with resistance to any
of the tested antibiotics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which variables
were associated with carriage of resistant E. coli. Individuals in the community with varying levels of
contact with healthcare institutions and hospitalized patients were analysed as separate populations.
Results and conclusions: Of 3275 individuals (community 2494, hospital 781), 54% carried resistant
E. coli. Recent antibiotic use was the most important determinant of resistance in both populations
[community: odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5 2.3; hospital: OR 2.5, 95% CI
1.63.9]. In the community, hospitalization (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0 3.0), diarrhoeal symptoms (OR 1.9,
95% CI 1.3 2.7) and age under 16 years (adults: OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.30.5) were associated with carriage
of resistant E. coli. For hospitalized patients, having no health insurance was associated with less
resistance (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 0.9) and differences were observed between hospitals (Semarang: OR
2.2, 95% CI 1.53.3) and departments (Paediatrics: OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.7 10.7). Further research is
needed to investigate whether transmission is responsible for these differences.
Keywords: antibacterial agents, drug resistance, risk factors
Introduction
Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide healthcare problem that
threatens the progress in healthcare in developing countries.
1,2
Limited published data are available on antibiotic resistance in
Escherichia coli in the Far East and these primarily concern
clinical isolates.
3–14
Resistance data from Indonesia are mostly
limited to pathogens of diarrhoeal disease.
10,12,13,15 19
The use
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
*Corresponding author. Tel: þ31-71-5262613; Fax: þ31-71-5266758; E-mail: d.o.duerink@lumc.nl
†Members of the AMRIN study group are listed in the Acknowledgements section.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2007) 60, 377384
doi:10.1093/jac/dkm197
Advance Access publication 26 June 2007
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
377
# The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
of antibiotics is the most important determinant for emergence
of resistant micro-organisms.
20,21
Little is known about other
determinants for carriage of resistant bacteria, such as demo-
graphic
22
and socioeconomic
23,24
factors.
The study group ‘Antimicrobial Resistance in Indonesia:
Prevalence and Prevention’ (AMRIN) investigated rectal car-
riage of resistant bacteria among inhabitants of the island of
Java. Rectal swabs of individuals in the community and the hos-
pital were cultured for the presence of E. coli, a commensal
intestinal bacterium frequently used as an indicator of antibiotic
resistance in populations.
25
Antibiotic susceptibility testing of
the E. coli isolates was conducted for six antibiotics commonly
used in Indonesia: ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, genta-
micin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
The aim of the present study is to investigate whether recent
antibiotic use as well as demographic, socioeconomic, health-
care-related and disease-related variables are risk factors for car-
riage of resistant E. coli. We hypothesized that recent antibiotic
use would be associated with carriage of resistant E. coli, and
that due to transmission of resistant bacteria differences would
be found between nursing wards, departments and hospitals.
Materials and methods
Two government hospitals, the Dr Soetomo hospital in Surabaya,
East Java, and the Dr Kariadi hospital in Semarang, Central
Java, Indonesia, as well as three primary healthcentres (PHC,
two in Surabaya and one in Semarang) were selected for this
study. The hospital in Surabaya has ~60 000 and that in
Semarang 26 000 admissions per year. The Medical Ethics
Committees of the hospitals approved of the study protocol
[ethical clearance No/Panke.KKE/2001 (Surabaya) and 11/EC/FK/
RSDK/2001 (Semarang)]. Patients upon admission to hospital
(group A), healthy family members accompanying them (group
B), people visiting a primary healthcentre for consultation or
vaccination (group C) and patients upon discharge after hospital-
ization for 5 days or more (group D) were enrolled after giving
informed consent. The aim was to include 4000 individuals; 500
individuals per group per city, whereby each department was
equally represented.
For the purpose of analysis, individuals who had not been hospi-
talized (groups A, B and C) were combined into a community popu-
lation, whereas patients upon discharge from hospital (group D)
formed the hospital population.
Group A patients were included within the first 24 h of admis-
sion. Persons in group B were included on admission of group A
patients at a rate of one contact per patient. Patients in group C were
included on specific study days twice weekly in Surabaya and once
weekly in Semarang. Individuals were excluded from the study if
they had been transferred from another hospital, if they were not
accompanied by a family member (group A), or if they had been
admitted to a hospital during the previous three months (groups A,
B and C).
Demographic and socioeconomic data and, for community
patients, data on health complaints and consumption of antibiotics
in the month preceding the study were collected by semi-structured
interviews, performed by pairs of trained Indonesian and Dutch data
collectors (researchers, residents and medical students). For group
A, diagnosis on admission, and for group D, data on antibiotic con-
sumption during hospitalization and diagnosis on discharge were
collected from medical records. Subjects for whom susceptibility
testing and data on antibiotic consumption were available were
included in the analyses.
Variables
Recent antibiotic use was defined in accordance with the nomencla-
ture and subcategory definitions of the WHO ATC Classification
code, subgroup antibacterials for systemic use.
26
We analysed any
antibiotic use, i.e. whether or not a patient took any antibiotic in the
preceding month or during hospitalization; use of an antibiotic from
a specific ATC class, combined or not combined with an antibiotic
from a different class; and single antibiotic use, i.e. use of an anti-
biotic from a specific ATC class not combined with an antibiotic
from a different class. Combined use was defined as either simul-
taneous or successive use of antibiotics from different ATC classes.
Origin (Surabaya or Semarang), sex, age (newborn to 16 years of
age versus over 16 years of age in accordance with the age limit for
the Departments of Paediatrics, and children of less than two years
old versus people of more than two years of age in accordance with
approximate pre- and post-weaning periods), ethnicity and living
area (urban or rural) were the selected demographic variables.
Health insurance, income (below or above poverty line),
27
education
(primary school not completed versus primary school education and
higher), employment and crowding (one through eight versus nine
or more individuals sharing a household) were the chosen socioeco-
nomic variables. Group, Department (Internal Medicine, Surgery,
Obstetrics and Gynaecology or Paediatrics), nursing ward (sub-
department), nursing class (I, II or III, with class I being the most
expensive class) and length of stay in hospital (5 through 8 versus
9 days or more) were studied as healthcare-related variables. Only
the last ward of admission was recorded; transfers were not
recorded. For community patients, clinical signs and symptoms in
the month preceding the study (fever, diarrhoea, respiratory symp-
toms, other symptoms or no symptoms) were the disease-related
variables and for patients upon admission and discharge whether or
not an infection was diagnosed.
Selection of strains and susceptibility testing
Rectal samples were taken with sterile cotton-tipped swabs, which
were transported to the laboratory in Amies transport medium (Copan,
Brescia, Italy) in closed boxes at ambient temperature. They were
cultured within 24 h on CHROMagar Orientation (BectonDickinson,
Heidelberg, Germany) for the isolation of E. coli.
28
From each
culture, two colonies representing the dominantly growing bacterium
were further analysed. Pink colonies were assumed to be E. coli and
used for susceptibility testing without additional determination. From
the original 3995 isolates, almost 400 were confirmed by Vitek 2
(bioMe
´
rieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
11
Previously published vali-
dation of identification of E. coli by CHROMagar yielded a positive
predictive value of 0.93, which is comparable to our results.
28
Susceptibility testing was performed by the CLSI (formerly the
NCCLS)-based disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar
using discs containing ampicillin (10 mg), chloramphenicol (30 mg),
gentamicin (10 mg), cefotaxime (30 mg), ciprofloxacin (5 mg) and
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 mg).
29
The performance
of the susceptibility testing was monitored twice weekly with the
quality control strain E. coli ATCC 25922. Isolates that were suscep-
tible or intermediately susceptible according to the CLSI criteria
were categorized as susceptible.
For the purpose of analysis, a maximum of one E. coli isolate
per enrolled individual, namely the first E. coli isolate in the study
database, was included in the analysis.
Duerink et al.
378
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Analysis
Individuals carrying resistant strains were compared with individuals
carrying bacteria susceptible to all tested antibiotics. Resistance as
an outcome variable for each of the different antibiotics was
explored in two different ways:
(i) Resistance of E. coli to any of the tested antibiotics, irrespective
of whether this was resistance to the specific antibiotic con-
sidered, or whether the resistance to the antibiotic of interest
was part of a pattern of resistance to multiple antibiotics, was
taken as the outcome (dependent) variable, and possible deter-
minants for this variable identified.
(ii) Carriage of E. coli resistant to the specific antibiotic of interest
was taken as the outcome variable, and determinants for this
outcome variable identified. This approach was only pursued
when at least 100 isolates with the relevant resistance pattern
were available.
To identify determinants for any of these outcome variables, logistic
regression analysis with backward selection of variables (statistical
package SPSS, version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was
used.
In view of the large number of inter-related candidate determi-
nants, some of which were sparse (i.e. most individuals had the
same value for this variable), each of the analyses was performed
using a two-step procedure. First, candidate variables were selected
by performing logistic regression on four partially overlapping sets
of co-variables [Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC
Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)]:
(i) any antibiotic use, combined with all demographic, socioeco-
nomic, disease-related and healthcare-related determinants,
(ii) demographic determinants,
(iii) socioeconomic determinants,
(iv) disease-related and healthcare-related determinants (without
nursing wards).
Then, a ‘final’ logistic regression analysis was performed with all
variables that were significantly associated with antibiotic resistance
in any of these four analyses. The variables that were significantly
associated with resistance in this final analysis were presumed to be
independently associated (in the sense that the association was not
caused by confounding) with resistance. This approach of selecting
candidate variables was preferred over the usual strategy of picking
variables univariately significantly associated with the outcome vari-
able, as in our experience that strategy sometimes misses variables
that are only significantly associated with the outcome variable in
conjunction with other variables. Use of antibiotics from specific
antibiotic classes and single use of specific antibiotic classes were
analysed as separate sets of variables. When logistic regression
could not be performed because of sparse data, variables with very
small dispersion were excluded from the analyses.
Possible clustering of susceptibility patterns between groups A
and B was investigated by comparing whether included pairs of
individuals had similar susceptibility patterns and calculating
Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
Between July and October 2001 in Surabaya and January and
May 2002 in Semarang, 3995 subjects were included. In 3275
individuals, culture and susceptibility data on E. coli and anti-
biotic use data were complete. In 720 patients, data were not
suitable for analysis: 180 because there was no growth on the
agar plate, 385 because no pink colonies were present in the
culture and 155 because of missing susceptibility data
(Figure 1). No growth was observed significantly more fre-
quently in Semarang (8%) than in Surabaya (1%, P , 0.001). In
Surabaya, no significant differences were observed between the
groups, whereas in Semarang, the proportion with no growth
varied from 5% in group B to 13% in group D (P , 0.001). The
proportion of pink colonies did not differ significantly between
Surabaya and Semarang, or between the groups in Surabaya, but
varied between 80% in group D and 92% in group B (P , 0.001)
in Semarang. Missing or incomplete susceptibility data occurred
more frequently in Surabaya (8%) than in Semarang (1%,
P , 0.001). In Semarang, no significant differences were
observed between the groups, whereas in Surabaya, the pro-
portion with missing susceptibility data varied from 1% in group
B to 11% in group C (P , 0.001).
No significant differences in demographic, socioeconomic,
disease-related and healthcare-related variables were observed
between the community and hospital populations, with the
exception of age (Table 1). Additional information regarding
population characteristics can be found in Table S2 [available as
Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)]
for the community and in Table S3 [available as Supplementary
data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/)] for the
hospital.
Antimicrobial resistance
Of the 3275 E. coli strains, 1552 (47%) were susceptible to all
tested antibiotics, 585 (18%) to a single antibiotic and 1138
(35%) to two or more antibiotics (Table 2). In 69 strains (data
not shown in Table 2), resistance patterns were observed that
occurred less than eight times.
In the community, ampicillin resistance was observed most
frequently (851 isolates, 34%), followed by trimethoprim/sulfa-
methoxazole resistance in 716 isolates (29%) and chlorampheni-
col resistance in 369 isolates (15%). Resistance to ciprofloxacin,
gentamicin and cefotaxime occurred less than 100 times. Single
ampicillin resistance was observed in 236 isolates (9%) and
single trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in 162 isolates
(6%), whereas single chloramphenicol, gentamicin and cipro-
floxacin resistance were observed less than 100 times. Single
cefotaxime resistance was not present in any of the isolates.
In hospitalized patients, ampicillin resistance was also
observed most frequently (570 isolates, 73%), followed by tri-
methoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in 434 isolates (56%),
chloramphenicol resistance in 334 isolates (43%), ciprofloxacin
resistance in 173 isolates (22%) and gentamicin resistance in
141 isolates (18%). Cefotaxime resistance was observed less
than 100 times. In hospitalized patients, single resistance was
observed for less than 100 subjects for all tested antibiotics and
single cefotaxime resistance was not present in any of the
isolates.
Antibiotic use
Antibiotic use results are summarized in Table 3. In the commu-
nity (2494 individuals), 367 antibiotic courses were prescribed
in the month preceding the study, while for 781 hospitalized
individuals, 1084 antibiotic courses were prescribed. Penicillins
Determinants of resistant E. coli in Indonesia
379
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
ranked first and accounted for 71% of antibiotic use in the commu-
nity and 40% in hospitals. In the community tetracyclines (10%),
sulphonamides (7%) and amphenicols (7%) were the other fre-
quently used antibiotics. In the community 93% of antibiotic use
concerned the use of a single antibiotic. In the 2125 individuals in
the community who received no antibiotic treatment, the carriage
rate of multiple resistances (resistance to more than one antibiotic)
was 24%, in the 347 patients receiving one antibiotic 38% and in
the 22 patients receiving more than one antibiotic 46%.
In hospitalized patients, cephalosporins (22%) and quino-
lones (10%) ranked second and third, respectively. Single anti-
biotic use was observed in 33% of cases. In the 127 hospitalized
patients who received no antibiotic treatment, the carriage rate
of multiple resistances was 33%, in the 159 patients receiving
one antibiotic 64% and in the 495 patients receiving more than
one antibiotic 71%.
Determinants of resistance in the community
(groups A, B and C)
Analysis of determinants for resistance in the community was
performed with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics, single
ampicillin resistance and single trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
resistance, because more than 100 cases were available for these
resistance groups.
Any antibiotic use was associated with carriage of E. coli
with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics [odds ratio (OR)
1.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.52.3], single ampicil-
lin resistance (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 2.3) and single trimetho-
prim/sulfamethoxazole resistance (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.22.8).
Prior use of penicillins was associated with carriage of E. coli
resistant to any of the tested antibiotics (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4
2.4) and single ampicillin resistance (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.22.7).
Prior use of amphenicols was associated with carriage of E. coli
resistant to any of the tested antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3
7.5). Prior use of sulphonamides was associated with carriage of
E. coli resistant to any of the tested antibiotics (OR 5.5, 95% CI
2.114.8) and single trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance
(OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.0 28.0).
Logistic regression analysis performed with only single anti-
biotic use did not change the findings significantly; in most
cases, the same antibiotics were associated with resistance when
used as a single antibiotic drug or combined with other anti-
biotics (data not shown).
Socioeconomic variables were not associated with carriage of
resistant E. coli in the community. Neither were demographic
variables, except for age: adults were less likely to be carriers of
E. coli with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics (OR 0.4,
95% CI 0.30.5) and single ampicillin resistance (OR 0.6, 95%
CI 0.4 0.9) than children. The same analysis with children of
Figure 1. Flow chart with numbers of enrolled and analysed subjects. Reasons for exclusion of enrolled subjects from analysis: NG, no growth on agar plate;
NP, no pink colonies on agar plate; NS, no complete susceptibility data.
Duerink et al.
380
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
less than 2 years old versus people of more than 2 years of age
yielded similar results (data not shown). Admission to hospital
(group A) was associated with carriage of E. coli resistant to
any of the tested antibiotics (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0 3.0) and
single ampicillin resistance (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.94.0, group
B ¼ reference category). Susceptibility patterns of groups A and
B did not correlate, although individuals from these groups were
included as pairs (Pearson’s correlation coefficient ¼ 0.014).
Diarrhoea was associated with carriage of E. coli resistanttoany
of the tested antibiotics (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.32.7).
Determinants of resistance in hospitalized patients (group D)
Analysis of determinants for resistance in hospitalized patients
was only performed with resistance to any of the tested anti-
biotics, because single resistance was observed for less than 100
subjects for all tested antibiotics.
The use of any antibiotic (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.63.9),
penicillins (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.24.8), amphenicols (OR 3.9, 95%
CI 1.212.8), quinolones (OR 6.8, 95% CI 3.015.1) and metro-
nidazole (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.17.6) was associated with carriage
of E. coli with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics.
Logistic regression analysis with only single antibiotic use
changed the findings significantly for carriage of E. coli with
resistance to any of the tested antibiotics: any (single or com-
bined) cephalosporin use was not associated with resistance, but
single cephalosporin use was associated with less carriage of
E. coli with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics (OR 0.2,
95% CI 0.1 0.5). Single use of other antibiotics was not associ-
ated with carriage of E. coli with resistance to any of the tested
antibiotics (data not shown).
Having no health insurance was associated with less carriage
of E. coli with resistance to any of the tested antibiotics (OR
0.6, 95% CI 0.4 0.9). Discharge from the hospital in Semarang
was associated with carriage of E. coli with resistance to any of
the tested antibiotics (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.53.3). Discharge from
the Department of Paediatrics (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.7 10.7),
rather than from Internal Medicine (reference category) was
associated with carriage of E. coli with resistance to any of the
tested antibiotics. Significant differences were observed between
several individual nursing wards, but for most wards the
numbers of patients were too small to draw any conclusions
from these data (data not shown).
Discussion
This study shows that antibiotic use is the most important albeit
not the only determinant of carriage of resistant E. coli. In the
non-hospitalized population, age under 17 and diarrhoea were
independent determinants. Individuals screened upon admission
to hospital carried resistant E. coli more often than patients who
visited a PHC and healthy relatives who accompanied patients at
admission to hospital. In hospitalized patients screened upon dis-
charge, having health insurance was associated with carriage of
resistant E. coli, as were several healthcare-related determinants:
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of community and hospital populations
Community n ¼ 2494 Hospital n ¼ 781 P
Surabaya 1186 (48) 386 (49) NS
Group A (admission) 818 (33)
Group B (relatives) 814 (33)
Group C (PHC) 862 (35)
Group D (discharge) 781 (100)
Internal Medicine 197
a
(24) 192 (25) NS
Surgery 203
a
(25) 204 (26) NS
Obstetrics and Gynaecology 217
a
(27) 209 (27) NS
Paediatrics 201
a
(25) 176 (23) NS
Age above 16 2032 (82) 558 (71) ,0.001
Female sex 1548 (62) 460 (59) NS
Javanese ethnicity 2377 (95) 733 (94) NS
Urban provenance 1615 (65) 497 (64) NS
Health insurance 641 (26) 219 (28) NS
Low income 1084 (57) 360 (46) NS
Primary school completed 1971 (79) 586 (75) NS
Employment 1575 (63) 447 (83) NS
Crowding .8 persons per household 315 (13) 73 (9) NS
Nursing class III 679
a
(83) 615 (79) NS
Length of stay .8 days 394 (50)
Clinical signs of infection 1805 (72)
Infection diagnosis in hospital 206
a
(32) 204 (26) NS
Absolute numbers are shown, with percentages between brackets.
‘NS’ means that no significant differences were observed between the populations.
a
Only calculated for group A; percentages are proportions of patients in group A.
Determinants of resistant E. coli in Indonesia
381
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
hospitalization in Semarang and admission to the Gynaecology
and Obstetrics or Paediatric Departments.
In concordance with our hypothesis, we observed that, for
most antibiotic classes, most resistance was present in the group
most exposed to antibiotics and least resistance in the group
least exposed to antibiotics. In the community, direct associ-
ations were observed between the use of specific antibiotics
and resistance to those antibiotics, namely between b-lactam
antibiotics and ampicillin resistance and sulphonamide use and
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance. Here, the majority of
antibiotic therapy consisted of single therapy.
For hospitalized patients, two-thirds of antibiotic treatments
were combined therapies. The use of penicillins, amphenicols,
quinolones and metronidazole was associated with resistance to
any of the tested antibiotics. Epidemiologically one can assume
that it represents a greater exposure to antibiotics, since most
patients took more than one antibiotic. Indeed there was a high
rate of multiple resistances. In the subset of hospitalized patients
treated with a single antibiotic, single use of a cephalosporin
was associated with less resistance to any of the tested anti-
biotics. It is unlikely that cephalosporins actually protect against
resistance. In a hospital population, where 84% of the patients
took antibiotics during admission, single b-lactam use might
reflect a relatively healthy population with a relatively low sus-
ceptibility to infections and exposed to relatively low quantities
of antibiotics (e.g. as prophylaxis).
Table 2. Resistance patterns
Number of isolates (%) Ampicillin Chloramphenicol Gentamicin Cefotaxime Ciprofloxacin
Trimethoprim/
sulfamethoxazole
1552 (47.4) S S S S S S
361 (11.0) R R S S S R
321 (9.8) R S S S S S
316 (9.6) R S S S S R
185 (5.6) S S S S S R
94 (2.9) R R S S S S
59 (1.8) R R S S R R
41 (1.3) S R S S S S
37 (1.1) R S S S R R
28 (0.9) R R R S R R
22 (0.7) R R R S S R
21 (0.6) R R R R R R
20 (0.6) R R R R S R
19 (0.6) S S S S R S
19 (0.6) S S R S S S
17 (0.5) R S S S R S
17 (0.5) R S R S R R
16 (0.5) S R S S S R
13 (0.4) R S R R R R
11 (0.3) R S S R S R
10 (0.3) R S R S S S
10 (0.3) R S R R S R
9 (0.3) S S S S R R
8 (0.2) R S R R R S
The number of times a given resistance pattern was found is shown in the first column, with the prevalence between brackets. Resistance is represented byan
R and susceptibility by an S.
Table 3. Total and single antibiotic use in community and hospital
populations
Community Hospital
Total
use (n)
Single
use (%)
Total
use (n)
Single
use (%)
Tetracycline 37 86 5 20
Penicillins 261 97 440 51
Amphenicols 24 75 52 15
Cephalosporins 0 0 239 30
Carbapenems 0 0 3 0
Sulphonamides 26 88 39 15
Macrolides 10 60 26 15
Aminoglycosides 2 100 92 2
Quinolones 3 100 114 34
Metronidazole 4 100 69 0
Others 0 0 5 0
Total 367 93 1084 33
Total use (n) is the number of antibiotic prescriptions; single use (%) is
single antibiotic use as percentage of total number of prescriptions.
Duerink et al.
382
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
Several other determinants, although independent from anti-
biotic use in the analysis, can still be explained by a relatively
high exposure to antibiotics. Health insurance increased the
probability of carriage of resistant E. coli. This is most likely, at
least partly, due to the different consumption pattern of anti-
biotics. Individuals with health insurance consumed antibiotics
more frequently, took longer antibiotic courses and different
antibiotic classes, namely cephalosporins, macrolides and quino-
lones, than people without health insurance.
In the community, more children than adults carried resistant
E. coli. Several factors may have contributed to carriage of
resistant E. coli in children. Young children generally tend to
receive antibiotics more frequently than adults.
30
The AMRIN
study confirmed that more children than adults received anti-
biotics. Apart from antibiotic use, children might acquire resist-
ant bacteria more easily than adults, because of their greater
exposure through unhygienic behaviour.
With regard to clinical signs and symptoms, we observed that
individuals who reported diarrhoea had a higher probability of
carriage of resistant E. coli than individuals with other or no
complaints. We must interpret these data carefully, since diar-
rhoea often occurs during antibiotic use and patients may have
incorrectly reported diarrhoea as a symptom instead of an
adverse reaction to an antibiotic.
Our results indicate that the hospital, the department and the
nursing ward to which a patient is admitted are determinants of
carriage of resistant E. coli in hospitalized patients. In hospitals,
transmission of resistant bacteria contributes to the problem of
antibiotic resistance, probably much more so than in the commu-
nity.
31,32
Further investigations are needed to show whether
transmission of resistant strains of E. coli explains the differ-
ences between the two hospitals, the departments and the wards.
There are several limitations to the study. Antibiotic use in
the community was self-reported. We may have missed determi-
nants for carriage of resistant E. coli, because, since quantitative
analysis was not feasible with the amount of variables analysed,
we dichotomized the variables for the purpose of analysis. The
design of the study is not useful for making statements about
mechanisms causing resistance, although it is helpful for making
recommendations for further research. Finally, care must be
taken in generalization of our results to the general Javanese
population, as the majority of participants were in contact with
healthcare institutions, in varying levels. The community popu-
lation consisted of several subgroups, with group B being most
representative of the general Javanese population. The hospital
population was approximately representative of urban Javanese
government hospitals, with a tendency towards longer than
average hospital admissions. However, the design proved useful
to show that the more intensively individuals are in contact with
healthcare institutions, the more prone they are to carriage of
resistant E. coli.
In conclusion, antibiotic use was the most important determi-
nant for carriage of resistant E. coli in our study. Most antibiotic
classes were associated with carriage of resistant E. coli.An
aberrant antibiotic consumption pattern of people with health
insurance may explain the role of health insurance. Children,
regardless of more frequent antibiotic use, were at greater risk of
carriage of resistant E. coli than adults, perhaps because of the
greater exposure to (resistant) microorganisms. Differences
between and within hospitals point to transmission of resistant
bacteria within hospitals.
Acknowledgements
We thank the deans of the participating medical faculties and
the directors of participating hospitals, the directors of the parti-
cipating PHC and the heads of the participating departments,
who have facilitated our work in these hospitals. We gratefully
acknowledge the contribution of the data collectors: Diana Huis
in ‘t Veld, Suzanne Werter, Ka-Chun Cheung, Eko Budi
Santoso, Hadi Susatyo, Arwin Achyar, Sony Wibisono,
Bramantono, Vera, Yenni Suryaningtyas, Upik Handayani,
Krisma Irmajanti, Purnomo Hadi, Rianne de Jong and
Rozemarijn van der Meulen, and all those who helped us with
the pilot study and data registration. We also thank Emile
F. Schippers for his very useful comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Royal Netherlands Academy of
Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Science Programme Indonesia, the
Netherlands (project 99-MED-03).
Members of the AMRIN study group:
Dr Soetomo Hospital—School of Medicine Airlangga
University Surabaya, Indonesia: Prof. Widjoseno Gardjito, M.D.;
Erni P. Kolopaking, MPPM; Prof. Karjadi Wirjoatmodjo, M.D.;
Prof. Djoko Roeshadi, M.D., Ph.D.; Prof. Eddy Suwandojo,
M.D.; Hari Parathon, M.D.; Usman Hadi, M.D.; Nun Zairina,
Hosp. Pharm.; Endang Isbandiati, M.D., Ph.D.; Kartuti Deborah,
M.D.; K. Kuntaman, M.D., Ph.D.; Ni Made Mertaniasih, M.D.,
Ph.D; Marijam Poerwanta, M.Sc.
Dr Kariadi Hospital—School of Medicine Diponegoro
University Semarang, Indonesia: Prof. Ariawan Soejoenoes,
M.D.; Budi Riyanto, M.D.; Hendro Wahjono, M.D., Ph.D.;
Musrichan Adhisaputro, M.D.; Bambang Triwara, Pharm.D.;
Johnny Syoeib, M.D.; Endang Sri Lestari, M.D.; Bambang
Wibowo, M.D.; Muchlis AU Sofro, M.D.; H. Farida, M.D.,
M.Sc.; M.M. Hapsari, M.D.; Tri Laksana Nugraha, M.D., M.Sc.
Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands:
Prof. P.J. van den Broek, M.D., Ph.D.; D.O. Duerink, M.D., M.A.
Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands: Prof. H.A. Verbrugh, M.D., Ph.D.; I.C. Gyssens,
M.D., Ph.D.
Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands: M. Keuter, M.D., Ph.D.
Transparency declarations
None to declare.
Supplementary data
Tables S1, S2 and S3 are available as Supplementary data at
JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/).
References
1. Shears P. Antibiotic resistance in the tropics. Epidemiology and
surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in the tropics. Trans R Soc Trop
Med Hyg 2001; 95 : 12730.
2. Okeke IN, Klugman KP, Bhutta ZA et al. Antimicrobial resistance
in developing countries. Part II: strategies for containment. Lancet
Infect Dis 2005; 5: 568 80.
Determinants of resistant E. coli in Indonesia
383
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
3. McDonald LC, Chen FJ, Lo HJ et al. Emergence of reduced
susceptibility and resistance to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli
in Taiwan and contributions of distinct selective pressures. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 2001; 45: 3084 91.
4. Bell JM, Turnidge JD, Jones RN. Prevalence of extended-
spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae in the Asia-Pacific
region: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program,
1998 to 2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 398993.
5. Chong Y, Lee K, Park YJ et al. Korean Nationwide Surveillance
of Antimicrobial Resistance of bacteria in 1997. Yonsei Med J 1998;
39: 569 77.
6. Goldmann DA, Huskins WC. Control of nosocomial
antimicrobial-resistant bacteria: a strategic priority for hospitals world-
wide. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24 Suppl 1: S139 45.
7. Hsueh PR, Liu CY, Luh KT. Current status of antimicrobial resist-
ance in Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8: 132 7.
8. Hsueh PR, Chen ML, Sun CC et al. Antimicrobial drug resist-
ance in pathogens causing nosocomial infections at a university hospi-
tal in Taiwan, 19811999. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:638.
9. Kim WJ, Park SC. Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents:
an overview from Korea. Yonsei Med J 1998; 39: 48894.
10. Oyofo BA, Lesmana M, Subekti D et al. Surveillance of bacterial
pathogens of diarrhea disease in Indonesia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
2002; 44: 227 34.
11. Kuntaman K, Lestari ES, Severin JA et al. Fluoroquinolone-
resistant Escherichia coli Indonesia. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:
13639.
12. Subekti DS, Lesmana M, Tjaniadi P et al. Prevalence of enterotoxi-
genic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in hospitalized acute diarrhea patients in
Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 47: 399–405.
13. Tjaniadi P, Lesmana M, Subekti D
et al .
Antimicrobial resistance
of bacterial pathogens associated with diarrheal patients in Indonesia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003; 68: 66670.
14. Sheng WH, Chen YC, Wang JT et al. Emerging fluoroquinolone-
resistance for common clinically important gram-negative bacteria in
Taiwan. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 43: 1417.
15. Lewis MT, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. In vitro evaluation of cefe-
pime and other broad-spectrum b-lactams against bacteria from
Indonesian medical centers. The Indonesia Antimicrobial Resistance
Study Group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 35: 285 90.
16. Agtini MD, Soeharno R, Lesmana M et al. The burden of diar-
rhoea, shigellosis, and cholera in North Jakarta, Indonesia: findings
from 24 months surveillance. BMC Infect Dis 2005; 5: 89.
17. Lesmana M, Subekti DS, Tjaniadi P et al. Spectrum of vibrio
species associated with acute diarrhea in North Jakarta, Indonesia.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 43:917.
18. Lesmana M, Subekti D, Simanjuntak CH et al. Vibrio parahae-
molyticus associated with cholera-like diarrhea among patients in
North Jakarta, Indonesia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 39:715.
19. Donegan EA, Wirawan DN, Muliawan P et al. Fluoroquinolone-
resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Bali, Indonesia: 2004. Sex Transm
Dis 2006; 33: 625 9.
20. Bronzwaer SL, Cars O, Buchholz U et al. A European study on
the relationship between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance.
Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8: 278 82.
21. Farra A, Skoog G, Wallen L et al. Antibiotic use and Escherichia
coli resistance trends for quinolones and cotrimoxazole in Sweden.
Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34: 449 55.
22. Harbarth S, Samore MH. Antimicrobial resistance determinants
and future control. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 794801.
23. Jansson C, Franklin A, Skold O. Trimethoprim resistance arising
in animal bacteria and transferring into human pathogens. J Infect Dis
1993; 167: 785 7.
24. Levy SB, FitzGerald GB, Macone AB. Changes in intestinal flora
of farm personnel after introduction of a tetracycline-supplemented
feed on a farm. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 583 8.
25. Bruinsma N, Stobberingh E, de Smet P et al. Antibiotic use and
the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria from healthy volun-
teers in the Dutch community. Infection 2003; 31: 9 14.
26. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology
2003. Anatomic Therapeutical Chemical (ATC) classification index with
Defined Daily Doses (DDDs). http://www.whocc.no/atcddd (11 October
2006, date last accessed).
27. BPS-Statistics Indonesia BAPPENAS, UNDP. Indonesia Human
Development Report 2004 The Economics of Democracy Financing
human development in Indonesia, 2004.
28. Filius PM, van Netten D, Roovers PJ et al. Comparative evalu-
ation of three chromogenic agars for detection and rapid identification
of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria in the normal intestinal microflora.
Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9: 912 8.
29. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility: Approved
Standard M2-A7. NCCLS, Villanova, PA, USA, 2000.
30. Okeke IN, Laxminarayan R, Bhutta ZA et al. Antimicrobial resist-
ance in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status.
Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 481 93.
31. Tenover FC, Hughes JM. The challenges of emerging infectious
diseases. Development and spread of multiply-resistant bacterial
pathogens. JAMA 1996; 275: 3004.
32. Tenover FC, McGowan JE Jr. Reasons for the emergence of
antibiotic resistance. Am J Med Sci 1996; 311: 9 16.
Duerink et al.
384
by guest on June 1, 2013http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/Downloaded from
... This study assessed the susceptibility of bacterial causes of UTIs in outpatients against cotrimoxazole and compared the results with inpatients. In the outpatients, 8 Outpatients Inpatients cotrimoxazole in the community (71%) is better than that in hospitals (44%). 8 K. pneumoniae is the most frequent bacterial cause of UTIs in outpatient women, and it showed a very good susceptibility pattern of 100%. ...
... In the outpatients, 8 Outpatients Inpatients cotrimoxazole in the community (71%) is better than that in hospitals (44%). 8 K. pneumoniae is the most frequent bacterial cause of UTIs in outpatient women, and it showed a very good susceptibility pattern of 100%. E. coli, the second most common cause of UTIs in outpatients in this study, showed a lower susceptibility. ...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND Cotrimoxazole, which has been one of the drugs of choice for urinary tract infections (UTIs) since 1960, must be evaluated to determine whether it is still a relevant drug for this use. This study aimed to assess the susceptibility patterns to cotrimoxazole of the bacteria that cause UTIs from urine samples of female outpatients (community-acquired [CA]-UTI) and inpatients (hospital-acquired [HA]-UTI) in Jakarta. METHODS This study was conducted from December 2014 to December 2015. Susceptibility testing of bacteria causing UTIs was conducted on 27 of 311 female outpatient urine samples collected from six clinics in Jakarta, and secondary data susceptibility testing was performed on 27 of 107 urine samples of inpatients from hospitals in Jakarta. These samples were examined in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. RESULTS Susceptibility to cotrimoxazole was reported in 83% of the bacteria causing UTIs in CA-UTI and 44% of the bacteria in HA-UTI patients. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common cause of CA-UTI, with all isolates susceptible to cotrimoxazole (100%). Conversely, Escherichia coli was the most common cause of HA-UTI but was only susceptible in some isolates (44%). Bacteria from CA-UTI patients were almost twice as susceptible to cotrimoxazole compared with HA-UTI patients (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Based on the susceptibility patterns identified, cotrimoxazole can be used as a treatment for CA-UTI but not for HA-UTI patients in Jakarta, Indonesia.
... 1,2,6 At worst, the increasing number and spreading of resistant bacteria put us on the cusp of a post-antibiotic era when common infections and minor injuries could cause death. 1 A study conducted in Surabaya and Semarang showed that 54% of individuals, either in the community or hospitals, had carried resistant Escherichia coli. 7 Self-medication has been proven to be one of the causes of antibiotic resistance. 8,9 Widayati et al 10 found that the 7.3% of people in Yogyakarta had self-medicated with antibiotics. ...
... www.nature.com/scientificreports/ the community level to contain the global antibiotic resistance crises; despite some studies that compare the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics in both communities and hospitals all showed consistently high values with no significant difference 8,22,[37][38][39][40] . Thus, similar attention should be given to contain the cause of resistance to antibiotics by bacteria in communities, as is the case in hospitals. ...
Article
Full-text available
Antibiotic resistance is a global health crisis that requires urgent action to stop its spread. To counteract the spread of antibiotic resistance, we must improve our understanding of the origin and spread of resistant bacteria in both community and healthcare settings. Unfortunately, little attention is being given to contain the spread of antibiotic resistance in community settings (i.e., locations outside of a hospital inpatient, acute care setting, or a hospital clinic setting), despite some studies have consistently reported a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance in the community settings. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy humans in community settings in LMICs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we synthesized studies conducted from 1989 to May 2020. A total of 9363 articles were obtained from the search and prevalence data were extracted from 33 articles and pooled together. This gave a pooled prevalence of antibiotic resistance (top ten antibiotics commonly prescribed in LMICs) in commensal E. coli isolates from human sources in community settings in LMICs of: ampicillin (72% of 13,531 isolates, 95% CI: 65–79), cefotaxime (27% of 6700 isolates, 95% CI: 12–44), chloramphenicol (45% of 7012 isolates, 95% CI: 35–53), ciprofloxacin (17% of 10,618 isolates, 95% CI: 11–25), co-trimoxazole (63% of 10,561 isolates, 95% CI: 52–73), nalidixic acid (30% of 9819 isolates, 95% CI: 21–40), oxytetracycline (78% of 1451 isolates, 95% CI: 65–88), streptomycin (58% of 3831 isolates, 95% CI: 44–72), tetracycline (67% of 11,847 isolates, 95% CI: 59–74), and trimethoprim (67% of 3265 isolates, 95% CI: 59–75). Here, we provided an appraisal of the evidence of the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance by commensal E. coli in community settings in LMICs. Our findings will have important ramifications for public health policy design to contain the spread of antibiotic resistance in community settings. Indeed, commensal E. coli is the main reservoir for spreading antibiotic resistance to other pathogenic enteric bacteria via mobile genetic elements.
... The percentage of people who colonized by faecal Escherichia colimicroflora resistant to ampicillin and cephalotin showed significant increase when the patient came out of ICU or the hospital and remained unchanged for 3 months after discharge from the hospital. The frequency of this resistance will increase significantly in patients with longer hospitalization in intensive care (Duerink et al., 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
Resistance to antibiotics is increasing worldwide, including in Indonesia. The use of antibiotics is the most common cause of microorganism resistance. Individuals who received antibiotic therapy impacton changes of normal micro-flora resistance through selective pressure. This study aims to analyze the relationship of the quantity of antibiotic use with the pattern of resistance of gut normal flora Escherichia coliamong patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Tropic Infection Ward, Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya. This study was cross-sectional design with 64 samples (32 the ICU and 32 in Tropic Infection Ward). The total sample were collected for three Months. Identification of intestinal microflora was done with McConkey differential selective medium, followed by IMViC biochemical test, and sensitivity test by antibiotic disc diffusion method. Data were analyzed with Chi square test and Fisher'sExact test. There was no significant difference (p=0.441) in the quantity of antibiotic use between ICU and Tropic Infection Ward. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in normal intestinal flora Escherichia coli resistance pattern between Tropic Infection Ward and ICU against12 types of antibiotics. Ceftriaxone was the most widely used antibiotic in the Tropic Infection Ward of 54 DDD and ICU of 100 DDD. The highest percentage of intestinal flora Escherichia coli resistance at the ICU was ceftriaxone as manyas 18 (56.3%) and at Tropic Infection Ward on ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin 20 (62.5%). The other study in Primary Health center, showed that theresistance rates of both wards were significantly different as compared to intestinal flora of patients in primary health center (p <0.001), in whichthe use of antibiotics in primary health center was also lower (1.6 DDD). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) The pattern of bacterial resistance between patient with and without antibiotic use at Tropic Infection Ward and ICU Conclusion: the quantity of antibiotic use was not significantly different against resistnt gut flora between patients in ICU and Tropic Infection ward. The pattern of bacterial resistance between patient with and without antibiotic use was also not significantly different.
... Isolation and identification of E. coli from fecal samples were performed using Luria-Bertani [7,15]. The prevalence of ABP resistance in this study is similar to that observed in hospital settings in Indonesia, which ranged from 73 to 78% [5,25]. Therefore, our results suggest the possibility that small mammals acquire AMR E. coli through contact with human sewage and animal excretions containing AMR E. coli in the environment. ...
Article
Full-text available
The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in small mammals dwelling in the city was used as an indicator of AMR bacteria in the environment. We captured 87 small mammals (79 brown rats and 8 house shrews) in four markets, Bogor, Indonesia in October 2019, and we obtained 20 AMR Escherichia coli from 18 brown rats and two house shrews. Of these, eight isolates were determined to be multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli. This study shows that AMR E. coli has contaminated the markets in Bogor, Indonesia, and that mammals, including humans, are at risk of infection with AMR E. coli from environment.
... On the other hand, B. cereus manifest resistance to b-lactam antibiotics [13]; in our case, it was not possible to determine its susceptibility. Finally, E. coli is commonly resistant against routinely used antibiotics; one of the most important determinant for resistance is the recent antibiotic use [14]. In this subject, the strain was susceptible to cefuroxime. ...
... The data in the literature are discordant with regard to the link between deprivation level and risk of infection by multiresistant bacteria. Several studies have shown that the educational level [38][39][40] or low income 39 of the population did not seem to have an impact on the carriage of resistant E. coli. However, a UK study established that community-level low adult education along with poor living conditions impacted on the prevalence of cefuroximeresistant E. coli. ...
Article
Objectives The prevalence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. coli) in community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI) has been increasing worldwide since 2000, but with large geographical variations. The aim of this study was to determine whether the ESBL-E. coli rate in urine samples from individuals with community-acquired UTI was associated with the local socio-economic, environmental, agricultural and healthcare characteristics. Methods This was a cross-sectional study in western France using data on antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli isolated from urine samples of individuals with community-acquired UTI analysed in non-hospital laboratories from 2015 to 2017. The ESBL-E. coli rate was calculated for each laboratory. Data on socio-economic characteristics, human antibiotic consumption, hospital bed density, animal farming density and percentage of agricultural land and surface water were retrieved at the municipality level and aggregated by study area. Their association with ESBL-E. coli prevalence was quantified using multivariate linear regression models with a backward selection. Results From 358 291 E. coli isolates from urine samples tested in 92 laboratories, the mean ESBL-E. coli prevalence for the study period was 3.30%. In an adjusted model, the ESBL-E. coli rate was significantly (P < 0.05) and positively associated with the local percentage of people >65 years old, third-generation cephalosporin use (DDD/1000 inhabitants), number of hospital beds/km2, poultry density, pig density and percentage of agricultural land. Lower deprivation was associated with a higher ESBL-E. coli rate. Conclusions Several anthropogenic factors (primary care, hospitals and animal farming) are associated with the local ESBL-E. coli rate in community-acquired UTI. These results could contribute to improve risk management, including identification of at-risk patient groups.
... The percentage of people who colonized by faecal Escherichia colimicroflora resistant to ampicillin and cephalotin showed significant increase when the patient came out of ICU or the hospital and remained unchanged for 3 months after discharge from the hospital. The frequency of this resistance will increase significantly in patients with longer hospitalization in intensive care (Duerink et al., 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to analyze the relationship of the quantity of antibiotic use with the pattern of resistance of gut normal flora Escherichia coli among patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Tropic Infection Ward, Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya. This study was cross-sectional design with 64 samples (32 the ICU and 32 in Tropic Infection Ward). The total sample were collected for three Months. Identification of intestinal microflora was done with McConkey differential selective medium, followed by IMViC biochemical test, and sensitivity test by antibiotic disc diffusion method. Data were analyzed with Chi square test and Fisher's Exact test. There was no significant difference (p=0.441) in the quantity of antibiotic use between ICU and Tropic Infection Ward. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in normal intestinal flora Escherichia coli resistance pattern between Tropic Infection Ward and ICU against 12 types of antibiotics. The highest percentage of intestinal flora Escherichia coli resistance at the ICU was ceftriaxone as many as 18 (56.3%) and at Tropic Infection Ward on ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin 20 (62.5%). The other study in Primary Health center, showed that the resistance rates of both wards were significantly different as compared to intestinal flora of patients in primary health center (p <0.001), in which the use of antibiotics in primary health center was also lower (1.6 DDD). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) The pattern of bacterial resistance between patient with and without antibiotic use at Tropic Infection Ward and ICU. The quantity of antibiotic use was not significantly different against resistnt gut flora between patients in ICU and Tropic Infection ward. The pattern of bacterial resistance between patient with and without antibiotic use was also not significantly different.
... Some bacteria had been being resistant against antibiotics, for instance gentamicin-R Enterococcus, vancomycin-R Enterococcus, levofloxacin-R Pneumococcus, imipenem-R Enterobacteriaceae, vancomicin-R Staphylococcus, ceftriaxone-R Nesseria gonorrhoeae, dan ceftaroline-R Staphylococcus [6]. Research about Escherichia coli resistance showed that 21 bacteria isolates (0,6%) were resistant against ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, ciprofloxacine, cefotaxime, and trimethoprim /sulfamethoxazole [7]. Lewis et al. reported that resistance also occured against ceftriaxone and imipenem on Acine-tobacter spp. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Sepsis incidence which related with morbidity and mortality, is globally increasing. Sepsis occurs because of severe infections. Sepsis has life-threatening potential with organ disfungction complication, septic shock, and death. Alteration of resistance pattern always change at certain period. The aim of the study is to investigate the bacteria pattern and its resistance from adult sepsis patient at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital. Methods: Isolated bacteria from adult sepsis patient blood at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital. 7 bacteria isolates were taken from blood of adult sepsis patient (September - October 2014) and 46 bacteria isolates of secondary data (January - March 2014) at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital. Bacteria isolation was performed based on standard Laboratory of Microbiology of Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital. 7 bacteria isolates were tested by using disc diffusion antibiotic on Mueller Hinton and coupled by 46 secondary data. Results: The bacteria pattern from adult sepsis patients were Staphylococcus haemolyticus (15,09%), Staphylococcus hominis (15,09%), Escherichia coli (13,21%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (11,32%). Resistance pattern of bacteria on adult sepsis with level of resistant more than 50% as Staphylococcus haemolyticus (ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gentamicin), Escherichia coli (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin), and Acinetobacter baumannii (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime) Conclutions: Based on this research, revealed that the most common bacteria caused sepsis was Gram negative about 64,64% of all bacteria on sepsis patient. The most frequent cause of sepsis was Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Escherichia coli.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is considered a leading pathogen contributing to the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. Objective: To better understand factors associated with the heterogeneity of community-acquired ESBL-producing E coli urinary tract infections (UTIs) in France. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study performed from January 1 to December 31, 2021, was based on data collected via PRIMO (Surveillance and Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance in Primary Care and Nursing Homes), a nationwide clinical laboratory surveillance system in France. Strains of E coli isolated from community urine samples from January 1 to December 31, 2019, from 59 administrative departments of metropolitan France were included. Main outcomes and measures: Quasi-Poisson regression models were used to assess the associations between several ecological factors available on government and administration websites between 2010 and 2020 (demographic population structure, living conditions, baseline health care services, antibiotic consumptions, economic indicators, animal farming density, and environmental characteristics) and the number of ESBL-producing E coli strains isolated from urine samples of individuals with community-acquired UTI in 2019. Results: Among 444 281 E coli isolates from urine samples tested in 1013 laboratories, the mean prevalence of ESBL-producing E coli was 3.0% (range, 1.4%-8.8%). In an adjusted model, the number of community-acquired ESBL-producing E coli UTIs in each department was positively associated with the percentage of children younger than 5 years (adjusted β1 coefficient, 0.112 [95% CI, 0.040-0.185]; P = .004), overcrowded households (adjusted β1 coefficient, 0.049 [95% CI, 0.034 to 0.062]; P < .001), consumption of fluoroquinolones (adjusted β1 coefficient, 0.002 [95% CI, 0.001-0.002]; P < .001), and tetracyclines (adjusted β1 coefficient, 0.0002 [0.00004 to 0.00039]; P = .02), and poultry density (adjusted β1 coefficient, 0.0001 [95% CI, 0.0001-0.0002]; P < .001). The social deprivation index (adjusted β1 coefficient, -0.115 [95% CI, -0.165 to -0.064]; P < .001) and the proportion of water surface area (adjusted β1 coefficient, -0.052 [-0.081 to -0.024]; P = .001) were negatively associated with a higher number of community-acquired ESBL-producing E coli UTIs. Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that multiple human health, animal health, and environmental factors are associated with the occurence of community-acquired ESBL E coli UTI. Strategies to mitigate ESBL in the community should follow the One Health approach and address the role played by fluoroquinolones, tetracycline use, poultry density, overcrowded households, and preschool-aged children.
Article
Full-text available
Resistance is an emerging problem in human medicine and the effects of resistance are being noted on an ever-increasing scale. Whether it is treatment of nosocomial bacteremia in New York City or community-acquired dysentery in Central Africa, multiresistant organisms are diminishing our ability to control the spread of infectious diseases. Clearly, the rate at which resistant organisms develop is not solely a function of the use of antimicrobials in humans, but is also highly influenced by the use of these agents in veterinary medicine, animal husbandry, agriculture, and aquaculture, as has been emphasized at recent meetings sponsored by organizations such as Rockefeller University and the American Society for Microbiology, and in the report on bacterial resistance recently issued by the US Office of Technology Assessment. We have entered an era where both physicians and patients must take on the responsibility to use antimicrobials wisely and judiciously. Just as in the days at the turn of the century when the public was an integral part of establishing quarantines for infectious diseases, now again the public's cooperation must be sought for this latest threat to public health. The multiresistant organisms of the 1990s are a grim warning of the possibility of the postantibiotic era.
Article
Full-text available
The rapid emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals worldwide is a problem of crisis dimensions. The root causes of this problem are multifactorial, but the core issues are clear. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance is highly correlated with selective pressure that results from inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents. Dissemination of resistant organisms is facilitated by person-to-person transmission due to inconsistent application of basic infection control practices by hospital personnel. While control strategies exist, the interventions are not likely to be successful unless hospital leaders assume the responsibility for control of antimicrobial resistance. Strategic goals for the control of resistant organisms should be formulated on the basis of multidisciplinary input from hospital personnel. Processes and outcomes relevant to these strategic goals should be measured, and the resultant data should be used to design, implement, and evaluate systematic measures to increase the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents and basic infection control practices. This approach is as relevant to hospitals in countries with limited resources as it is to in fully industrialized countries.
Article
Full-text available
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are known to be prevalent in tertiary-care hospitals in Korea. Twenty hospitals participated to this surveillance to determine the nationwide prevalence of resistance bacteria in 1997. Seven per cent and 26% of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin. Increased resistance rates, 19% of Acinetobacter baumannii to ampicillin/sulbactam, and 17% of Pseudomonas aeruginoa to imipenem, were noted. The resistance rate to fluoroquinolone rose to 24% in E. coli, 56% in A. baumannii and 42% in P. aeruginosa. Mean resistance rates were similar in all hospital groups: about 17% of P. aeruginosa to imipenem, 50% of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, 70% of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin, and 70% of pneumococci to penicillin. In conclusion, nosocomial pathogens and problem resistant organisms are prevalent in smaller hospitals too, indicating nosocomial spread is a significant cause of the increasing prevalence of resistant bacteria in Korea.
Article
Full-text available
Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria has become a worldwide problem. Available data suggest that the resistance problem is comparatively more serious in Korea. In large hospitals, the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been reported at over 70%, and of penicillin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae at around 70%. Infection or colonization of vancomycin-resistant enterococci has started to increase. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae has become widespread and even carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been increasing. Community-acquired pathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are often resistant to various antimicrobial agents. The prevalence of resistant bacteria can lead to erroneous empirical selection of either noneffective or expensive drugs, prolonging hospitalization and higher mortality. The emergence and spread of resistant bacteria are unavoidable unless antimicrobial agents are not used at all. The high prevalence of resistant bacteria in Korea seems to be related to antibiotic usage: 1) easy availability without prescription at drug stores, 2) injudicious use in hospitals, and 3) uncontrolled use in agriculture, animal husbandry, and fisheries. Nosocomial infection is an important factor in the spread of resistant bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance problems should be regarded as the major public health concern in Korea. It is urgently required to ban the sale of antibiotics without prescription, to use antibiotics more judiciously in hospitals by intensive teaching of the principles of the use of antibiotics, and to establish better control measures of nosocomial infections. Regulation of antimicrobials for other than human use should also be required. These issues are not easy to address and require the collective action of governments, the pharmaceutical industry, health care providers, and consumers.
Article
The in vitro activity of cefepime and six other broad-spectrum β-lactams (cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam (4 μg/mL fixed concentration), and oxacillin was evaluated against 191 isolates of clinical bacteria from Indonesia. Susceptibility testing was performed using Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) methodology. Isolates from 10 species groups were selected for analysis: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., indole-positive Proteae, Serratia spp., Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. The overall rank order of spectrum of activity was (% resistant): imipenem (2.2%) > cefepime (7.3%) > piperacillin/tazobactam > cefpirome > ceftazidime > ceftriaxone (16.2%). The “fourth-generation” cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, displayed greater activity compared with the “third-generation” cephalosporins, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, against the 60 E. coli and Klebsiella spp. (30 each) isolates. Phenotypic extended spectrum β-lactamase occurrence rates among the E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were 23.3 and 33.3%, respectively. Imipenem, cefepime, and cefpirome inhibited 95.7% of the 46 isolates of inducible Amp C cephalosporinase producing Enterobacteriaceae. The majority of the resistance observed to imipenem and cefepime among tested Indoneisian strains was attributable to the nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli, P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. These results indicate the presence of β-lactam resistance in Indonesia and the need for continued antimicrobial surveillance in this nation and region of the world, preferably using accurate quantitative methods.
Article
THE LIST of emerging infectious diseases is an intriguing constellation of new entities (a previously unrecognized Hantavirus), recognized pathogens that have caused recent outbreaks of unprecedented size (Cryptosporidium in municipal water supplies), outbreaks that have culminated in a reassessment of the issue of food safety (Escherichia coli O157:H7), and traditional nosocomial and community-acquired infections that, due to their resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, have suggested the possibility of a postantibiotic era.1,2Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are just a few of the organisms that have become considerably more difficult to treat due to increasing drug resistance. Examples of the types of resistant bacteria that have emerged around the world are shown in Figure 1, while specific examples of emerging resistance problems in the United States are shown in Figure 2. Clearly, the emergence of resistant organisms has been a global phenomenon. A recent Institute of Medicine report
Article
A prospective study was undertaken to determine whether feeding farm animals antibiotics in feed caused changes in the intestinal bacterial flora of farm dwellers and their neighbors. Chickens were fed tetracycline-supplemented feed (tet-feed), and, as expected, within one week their intestinal flora contained almost entirely tetracycline-resistant organisms. Increased numbers of resistant intestinal bacteria also appeared, but more slowly, in farm members, but not their neighbors. Within five and six months, 31.3 per cent of weekly fecal samples from farm dwellers contained greater than 80 per cent tetracycline-resistant bacteria as compared to 6.8 per cent of the samples from the neighbors (P less than 0.001). Seven of the 11 farm members, but only three of the 24 neighbors, had two or more fecal samples containing greater than 80 per cent tetracycline-resistant coliforms (P less than 0.01). These resistant bacteria contained transferable plasmids conferring multiple antibiotic resistances. Selective pressure by tet-feed for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in chickens extends to human beings in contact with chickens and the feed.
Article
The ability of many different species of bacteria, including those that cause diseases in humans, to resist the inhibitory action of antimicrobial agents has become a global problem. Resistance continues to spread not only in nosocomial pathogens but in several key community-acquired organisms as well. Appropriate control measures for such resistant organisms depend in part on the pathways by which resistance has arisen. Unfortunately, these pathways differ greatly from organism to organism and setting to setting. In addition, although the epidemiology of resistant organisms sometimes is similar to that of susceptible organisms of the same kind, in some situations it may be quite different. In this article, the authors highlight some of the pathways leading to the development of resistance in bacteria, the importance of antimicrobial use, and the relevance of these mechanisms to measures for the control of resistant bacteria in hospital and community settings.
Article
The in vitro activity of cefepime and six other broad-spectrum beta-lactams (cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam (4 micrograms/mL fixed concentration), and oxacillin was evaluated against 191 isolates of clinical bacteria from Indonesia. Susceptibility testing was performed using Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) methodology. Isolates from 10 species groups were selected for analysis: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., indole-positive Proteae, Serratia spp., Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. The overall rank order of spectrum of activity was (% resistant): imipenem (2.2%) > cefepime (7.3%) > piperacillin/tazobactam > cefpirome > ceftazidime > ceftriaxone (16.2%). The "fourth-generation" cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, displayed greater activity compared with the "third-generation" cephalosporins, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, against the 60 E. coli and Klebsiella spp. (30 each) isolates. Phenotypic extended spectrum beta-lactamase occurrence rates among the E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were 23.3 and 33.3%, respectively. Imipenem, cefepime, and cefpirome inhibited 95.7% of the 46 isolates of inducible Amp C cephalosporinase producing Enterobacteriaceae. The majority of the resistance observed to imipenem and cefepime among tested Indoneisian strains was attributable to the nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli, P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. These results indicate the presence of beta-lactam resistance in Indonesia and the need for continued antimicrobial surveillance in this nation and region of the world, preferably using accurate quantitative methods.