ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Pais R, Silaghi H, Silaghi AC, Rusu ML, Dumitrascu DLMetabolic syndrome and risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 15: 5141-5148

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity have an increasing prevalence and incidence in the general population. The actual prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is 24% in US population and between 24.6% and 30.9% in Europe. As demonstrated by many clinical trials (NAHANES III, INTERHART) the metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In addition to cardiovascular disease, individual components of the metabolic syndrome have been linked to the development of cancer, particularly to colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer is an important public health problem; in the year 2000 there was an estimated total of 944,717 incident cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed world-wide. This association is sustained by many epidemiological studies. Recent reports suggest that individuals with metabolic syndrome have a higher risk of colon or rectal cancer. Moreover, the clusters of metabolic syndrome components increase the risk of associated cancer. The physiopathological mechanism that links metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer is mostly related to abdominal obesity and insulin resistance. Population and experimental studies demonstrated that hyperinsulinemia, elevated C-peptide, elevated body mass index, high levels of insulin growth factor-1, low levels of insulin growth factor binding protein-3, high leptin levels and low adiponectin levels are all involved in carcinogenesis. Understanding the pathological mechanism that links metabolic syndrome and its components to carcinogenesis has a major clinical significance and may have profound health benefits on a number of diseases including cancer, which represents a major cause of mortality and morbidity in our societies.
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.wjgnet.com
Online Submissions: wjg.wjgnet.com World J Gastroenterol 2009 November 7; 15(41): 5141-5148
wjg@wjgnet.com World Journal of Gastroenterology ISSN 1007-9327
doi:10.3748/wjg.15.5141 © 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
ORIGINAL ARTICLES REVIEW
Metabolic syndrome and risk of subsequent colorectal cancer
Raluca Pais, Horatiu Silaghi, Alina Cristina Silaghi, Mihai Lucian Rusu, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu
Raluca Pais, Mihai Lucian Rusu, Dan Lucian Dumitrascu,
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine
and Pharmacy (Iuliu Hatieganu), Str Clinicilor 2-4, Cluj-Napoca
400006, Romania
Horatiu Silaghi, 2nd Department of Surgery, University of
Medicine and Pharmacy (Iuliu Hatieganu), Cluj-Napoca 400006,
Romania
Alina Cristina Silaghi, Department of Endocrinology, University
of Medicine and Pharmacy (Iuliu Hatieganu), Cluj-Napoca
400006, Romania
Author contributions: Pais R designed the research and wrote
the paper; Silaghi H and Silaghi AC performed the literature
review; Rusu ML and Dumitrascu DL suggested the subject and
revised the paper.
Supported by CNCSIS project number 1342 of Romanian
Ministry of Education
Correspondence to: Dan Lucian Dumitrascu, Professor, 2nd
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and
Pharmacy (Iuliu Hatieganu), Str Clinicilor 2-4, Cluj-Napoca
400006, Romania. ddumitrascu@umfcluj.ro
Telephone: +40-264-593355 Fax: +40-264-593355
Received: August 22, 2009 Revised: September 11, 2009
Accepted: September 18, 2009
Published online: November 7, 2009
Abstract
The metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity have an
increasing prevalence and incidence in the general
population. The actual prevalence of the metabolic
syndrome is 24% in US population and between
24.6% and 30.9% in Europe. As demonstrated by
many clinical trials (NAHANES , INTERHART) the
metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased
risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In ad-
dition to cardiovascular disease, individual components
of the metabolic syndrome have been linked to the de-
velopment of cancer, particularly to colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer is an important public health prob-
lem; in the year 2000 there was an estimated total of
944 717 incident cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed
world-wide. This association is sustained by many epi-
demiological studies. Recent reports suggest that indi-
viduals with metabolic syndrome have a higher risk of
colon or rectal cancer. Moreover, the clusters of metabolic
syndrome components increase the risk of associated
cancer. The physiopathological mechanism that links
metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer is mostly
related to abdominal obesity and insulin resistance.
Population and experimental studies demonstrated that
hyperinsulinemia, elevated C-peptide, elevated body
mass index, high levels of insulin growth factor-1, low
levels of insulin growth factor binding protein-3, high
leptin levels and low adiponectin levels are all involved
in carcinogenesis. Understanding the pathological
mechanism that links metabolic syndrome and its
components to carcinogenesis has a major clinical sig-
nicance and may have profound health benets on a
number of diseases including cancer, which represents
a major cause of mortality and morbidity in our societies.
© 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
Key words: Metabolic syndrome; Colorectal cancer;
Insulin resistance; Obesity; Adipokines; Inammatory
cytokines
Peer reviewer: Chakshu Gupta, MD, FCAP, Heartland
Regional Medical Center, St. Joseph 64506, United States
Pais R, Silaghi H, Silaghi AC, Rusu ML, Dumitrascu DL.
Metabolic syndrome and risk of subsequent colorectal cancer.
World J Gastroenterol
2009; 15(41): 5141-5148 Available
from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/15/5141.asp
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5141
INTRODUCTION
The concept of metabolic syndrome has existed for at
least 80 years and was rst described by Kylin[1], a Swedish
physician, as a clustering of hypertension, hyperglycemia
and gout, and later on by Vague[2] who added to the
previous description the presence of abdominal obesity.
While the concept of metabolic syndrome has been
accepted for a long time, there was no largely recognized
international denition until 1998.
The rst proposal came in 1998 from a consultation
group for the definition of diabetes for World Health
Organisation. This definition was then modified by
the European Group for Study of Insulin Resistance
in 1999, the National Cholesterol Education Program
Adult Treatment Panel (ATP ) in 2001 and revised
in 2005, and the International Diabetes Foundation
(IDF) in 2005. These denitions agree on the different
components of metabolic syndrome but differ in details
(Table 1)[3].
More recently, the use of the term of “metabolic
sy ndrome” has been questione d by the American
www.wjgnet.com
Diabetes Association and the European Association for
the Study of Diabetes for several reasons: (1) Criteria are
ambiguous or incomplete (for example it is unclear if the
blood pressure definition is systolic blood pressure
130 mmHg and diastolic 85 mmHg or whether it
is either 130 mmHg or > 85 mmHg); (2) The value
of including diabetes in the definition is questionable
and the role of insulin resistance as unifying etiology is
uncertain. Furthermore it is still unclear the extent to
which an elevated cardiovascular (CVD) risk is due to
insulin resistance itself vs isolated hyperinsulinemia; (3)
There is no clear basis for including/excluding other
CVD risk factors; the CVD risk associated with the
syndrome appears to be no greater than the sum of its
parts; (4) The treatment of the syndrome is not different
from the treatment for each of its components.
A recent review of the ATP denition broadened
the etiological basis of the syndrome from insulin
resistance alone to include “obesity and disorders of
adipose tissue”[4].
The actual prevalence of obesity is 30.5% and that
of associated metabolic syndrome is 24% in the US
population[3,5].
In Europe, the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of
metabolic syndrome was 24.6% using the 2005 ATP
definition and 30.9% using the International Diabetes
Federation denition, according to the MADRIC study
(MADrid Rlsego Cardiovascular Study) performed on
1344 participants[6]. In this study, the authors found a
good overall agreement between the ATP and IDF
denitions, much closer in women than in men (κ = 0.92
± 0.07 vs κ = 0.66 ± 0.06). The prevalence of metabolic
syndrome was greater according to the IDF denition
than according to ATP , because the former denition
has a lower threshold of abdominal obesity.
A cross-sectional analysis of 10 206 participants aged
20-89 years in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995-97
(HUNT 2) in Norway, found a prevalence of IDF-dened
metabolic syndrome of 29.6%, compared to 25.9% using
the 2005 ATP criteria[7].
In a meta-analysis, Cameron et al[8] found a variable
prevalence of metabolic syndrome in urban populations
from 8% (India) to 24% (USA) in men, and from 7%
(France) to 43% (Iran) in women.
It is well known that the metabolic syndrome is
associated with an increased risk of both diabetes and
cardiovascular disease.
Many clinical studies outlined the interrelation between
the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk[9].
Applying the ATP criteria to 10 537 NHANES
participants resulted in a signicant association between the
metabolic syndrome with prevalent myocardial infarction
and stroke in a multivariate analysis: myocardial infarction
[OR: 2.01, 95% condence intervals (CI): 1.53-2.64], stroke
(OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.48-3.16), and myocardial infarction/
stroke (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.64-2.57)[10].
The INTERHART study performed on 15 152 cases
and 14 820 controls in nearly 52 countries found a sig-
nificant association between abnormal lipids, smoking,
hypertension, diabetes, abdominal obesity, psychosocial
factors, consumption of fruits, vegetables, and alcohol,
and regular physical activity and the risk of myocardial
infarction. Collectively, these nine risk factors accounted
for 90% of the population risks in men and 94% in
women[11].
In addition to CVD, individual components of the
metabolic syndrome have been linked to the development
of cancer[12].
Colorectal cancer is an important health problem since
one million new cases are diagnosed world-wide each
year with half million related deaths[13]. The incidence
rate of colon cancer according to Five Continents cancer
registries varies from 3% in Africa (Algeria) up to 40% in
North America. In Europe the incidence of colon cancer
ranges from 12.1% in Belarus up to 30.5% in Italy[14].
There is evidence that body composition and hor-
monal factors contribute to colorectal cancer etiology. In
this paper we will highlight this association supported by
epidemiological data and pathophysiological mechanisms
arising from prospective human research studies.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
In an analysis of nearly 58 000 individuals who par-
ticipated in the Nat ional Health Interview Sur vey
(2002-2003), Garow et al[1 5] identified 1200 individuals
with metabolic syndrome, 350 of them being diagnosed
with colorectal cancer. After controlling for age, race,
gender, obesity, smoking and alcohol use the individuals
with metabolic syndrome had a 75% increased risk for
colon or rectal cancer.
In a large prospective study of more than 900 000 US
adults (404 576 men and 495 477 women) conducted by
Calle et al[16], there were 57 145 deaths from cancer during a
follow up period of 16 years. The authors also studied the
relationship between the relative risk (RR) of death and
body mass index (BMI). For all cancer there was a trend
in increasing death rate with BMI. For colorectal cancer
the RR of death varied from 1.34 (95% CI: 0.94-1.34) for
a BMI of 25-29.9, to 1.90 (95% CI: 1.46-2.47) and 4.52
(95% CI: 2.94-6.94) for an BMI between 30.0-34.9 and
35.0-39.9, respectively[16].
Recent studies also provide information concerning
the association between colorectal cancer incidence
and the number of metabolic syndrome components,
especially BMI, waist circumference (WC), lipid levels,
plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). In
an analysis of 14 109 participants from the ARIC study
(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), 194 incident
colorectal cancers were identied. In this study baseline
metabolic syndrome (> 3 components vs 0 components)
had a positive association with age-adjusted and gender-
adjusted colorectal cancer incidence (RR: 1.49, 95% CI:
1.0-2.4). There was a dose-response association between
colorectal cancer incidence and the number of metabolic
syndrome components present at baseline (P for trend =
0.006) after multivariate adjustment[17].
In another study, Trevisan et al[18], used information
5142 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2009 Volume 15 Number 41
www.wjgnet.com
from the Risk Factors and Life Expectancy study, which
pooled data from nine epidemiological studies conducted
in Italy between 1978 and 1987, including 21 311 men and
15 991 women. In this study, low high density lipoprotein
(HDL) and high triglyceride levels, hypertension and
plasma glucose levels were also analyzed as individual
components of the metabolic syndrome. For the presence
of the cluster of metabolic abnormalities, the calculated
hazard ratios and 95% CIs were 2.99 (1.27-7.01) when
both sexes were combined. When analyzing the individual
components, only glucose level was associated with an
increased risk of death from colorectal cancer, and only in
men and women combined (RR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.05-3.09).
The results of this study suggest that the effects of
the individual components of metabolic syndrome
are additive, because the RR of death from colorectal
cancer was increased in cluster analysis compared with
glucose alone.
The association between plasma glucose levels re-
ected by HbA1c and the incidence of colorectal cancer
was outlined in a prospective analysis from the European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
(EPIC) study[19]. Among 9605 participants in this study,
aged between 45 and 79 years, there were 67 incident
colorectal cancers. In this study population, the RR of
colorectal cancer for men and women combined was 2.94
(95% CI: 0.80-10.85), age and sex adjusted for an HbA1c
7%, compared with RR, 1.13 (95% CI: 0.56-2.30),
for HbA1c of 5.0%-5.9%. For the same HbA1c levels
of > 7%, the age adjusted RR was higher in men than
in women [RR: 4.94 (95% CI: 0.89-27.35) in men, and
1.58 (95% CI: 0.19-13.14) in women]. The association of
higher HbA1c levels and increased colorectal cancer risk
was also present in the CLUE cohort[20].
Conversely, to evaluate the association between meta-
bolic syndrome and colorectal cancer, Stocks et al[21] eval-
uated the presence of metabolic syndrome components
(C-peptide, HbA1c, leptin, adiponectin, BMI, hyperten-
sion and fasting glucose) in 306 individuals with known
colorectal cancer. The presence of hypertension, obesity
and hyperglycemia, correlated with a RR for three vs null
factors of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.20-5.52, P trend = 0.00021).
The relationship between BMI and colon cancer
was also studied in the recent EPIC study[22], which was
based on 984 cases of colon cancer. A 55% increased
risk of colon cancer was observed between the high
and low quintiles of BMI in men, but no significant
association was observed in women.
Some recent studies considered anthropometric
measures of adipose distribution in addition to BMI in
relation to the risk of colon cancer of adenoma. In most
of these studies, the association between WC or waist-
to-hip ratio and colon cancer risk was stronger than that
between BMI and cancer risk. Moore et al[23], in a retro-
spective analysis of 7566 subjects from the Framingham
cohort, found 306 cases of incident colorectal cancer.
The authors demonstrated a two-fold increased risk of
colorectal cancer for a WC of > 99 cm in women and
101 cm in men; the risk increased linearly with increas-
ing WC[23]. One Japanese study[24] of 51 consecutive
patients aged 40 years, suggests that visceral adipose
tissue rather than whole body adipose tissue correlates
better with the risk of colorectal adenoma. Furthermore,
in this study, low adiponectin level is a factor associ-
ated with the development of colorectal adenoma. It is
known that adiponectin levels decrease in obesity, espe-
cially abdominal obesity in association with insulin resis-
tance; thus, the results of this study offer an insight to
understanding the relationship of colorectal carcinogen-
esis with abdominal obesity and insulin resistance which
will be discussed later on this paper.
The fact that the metabolic syndrome is a risk factor
for both CVD and colorectal cancer raised the question
if there is any association between CVD and colorectal
cancer. This correlation was found to be positive in several
studies. In a pilot study of 63 patients with colorectal
cancer, Hamoudi and Dumitrascu demonstrated a
statistical association between CVD and colorectal cancer
in men[25].
The relationship between individual components of
metabolic syndrome and the risk of colorectal cancer
was also separately analyzed by several studies. Colangelo
et al[26] found a 35% increased risk of colorectal cancer
associated with high blood pressure. The results were
co nfirmed by anothe r study[1 7]. Bot h studi es also
underlined that the clustering of metabolic syndrome
components signicantly increased the risk of associated
colorectal cancer.
High circulating triacylglycerols were associated in
a large prospective study with a non-significant two-
Table 1 Comparison of denitions of metabolic syndrome
WHO 1999 ATP 2001 IDF 2005
Diabetes or impaired fasting glycemia or impaired
glucose tolerance or insulin resistance
Three or more of the following:
Central obesity: waist circumference
> 102 cm (male), > 88 cm (female)
Hypertriglyceridemia: triglycerides
> 150 mg/dL
Low HDL cholesterol: < 40 mg/dL (male),
< 50 mg/dL (female)
Hypertension: blood pressure
> 130/85 mmHg
Fasting plasma glucose > 100 mg/dL
Increased waist circumference > 94 cm cm in men
and > 80 cm in women plus any 2 of the following:
Hypertriglyceridemia: triglycerides > 150 mg/dL
Low HDL cholesterol: < 40 mg/dL (male),
< 50 mg/dL (female)
Hypertension: blood pressure > 130/85 mmHg
Fasting plasma glucose > 100 mg/dL
Plus 2 or more of the following:
Obesity: BMI > 30 or waist-to-hip ratio
> 0.9 (male) or 0.85 (female)
Dyslipidemia: triglycerides > 150 mg/dL or HDL
cholesterol < 35 mg/dL (male) or
< 39 mg/dL (female)
Hypertension: blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg
Microalbuminuria: albumin excretion > 20 μg/min
Pais R
et al
. Metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer 5143
www.wjgnet.com
fold elevation in risk of colorectal cancer in men, but no
clear association was observed in women[17]. In another
prospective study, there was a 40% increased risk of
colorectal cancer for men and women in the top quartile
of triacylglycerol levels, although this association was
not signicant[27].
The association between C-peptide levels as a marker
of hyperinsulinemia and colorectal cancer risk was also
examined by several studies. In a case control study in the
Physicians’ Health Study, an increased concentration of
plasma C-peptide was statistically signicantly associated
with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in men (RR
for the highest vs lowest quintile of plasma C-peptide =
2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-6.2, P trend = 0.047), after adjusting
for age, smoking status, fasting, BMI and alcohol
consumption. The results of this study also suggest
that elevated insulin production, as reected by elevated
concentrations of plasma C-peptide, may predict the
risk of developing colorectal cancer, independently of
BMI, factors related to insulin resistance, or levels of
insulin growth factor (IGF)-1 and insulin growth factor
binding protein (IGFBP)-3[28]. The interrelation between
a high concentration of plasma C-peptide and colorectal
adenoma was also demonstrated in women in a series of
380 patients with a multivariable relative risk (MVRR)
top vs bottom quartile, 1.63, 95% CI: 1.01-2.66, P = 0.01,
even after including BMI and physical activity in the
statistical model[29].
The findings of all these studies suggest that the
clusters of the metabolic syndrome components may
be predictors for developing colorectal cancer and for
colorectal cancer mortality. The understanding of the
underlying physiopathology that links the metabolic
syndrome and cancer may play a key role in developing
new strategies for prevention and treatment.
PHYSIOPATHOLOGICAL LINKS
BETWEEN METABOLIC SYNDROME AND
COLORECTAL CANCER
Obesity, insulin resistance and insulin growth factors
and binding proteins
It has been hypothesized that insulin resistance is the
most important underlying mechanism of the metabolic
syndrome in close relationship to abdominal obesity.
Insulin has been shown to affect growth of normal
and neoplastic epithelial cells and to have mitogenic ac-
tions in vitro and in experimental models, either directly
or indirectly through IGF-1[17]. At high concentrations,
insulin can bind to IGF-1 receptors (IGF1Rs) or can
act directly to promote IGF-1 biosynthesis, enhancing
IGF-1 bioavailability and inhibiting the production of
IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3[30].
IGF-1 is an important mitogen required for the
progression through the cell cycle and has autocrine,
paracrine and endocrine actions on cell proliferation
and apoptosis[31], increasing the risk of cellular transfor-
mation by enhancing cell turnover. In addition, IGF-1
increases the production of vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF), an angiogenic factor that can support
cancer growth[32].
It has been shown that normal colorectal epithelia
and colon cancer cells have both insulin and IGF1Rs[17].
Tissue homeostasis in the normal colonic crypt relies on
a balance between proliferation, differentiation and apop-
tosis, with apoptosis occurring at the top of the colonic
crypt as the culmination of a differentiation pathway.
The link between IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels and the
increased risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer came
rst to attention in acromegalic patients, characterized by
chronically elevated growth hormone (GH) levels. GH
excess leads to hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance
and thus to hyperinsulinemia, a common feature of
acromegaly and metabolic syndrome, that causes IGF-1
hypersecretion and low IGFBP-3 levels[33].
The relationship between IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels
and colorectal cancer was examined by Giovannucci
et al[34] on 32 826 women from Nurses’ Health Study.
Controlling for IGFBP-3 level, relative to women in the
lowest tertile of IGF-1, those in the highest tertile were
at elevated risk of intermediate/late-stage colorectal
neoplasia adenoma (MVRR: 2.78, 95% CI: 0.76-9.76)
and cancer (RR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.94-5.08). Controlling
for IGF-1 level, relative to women in the lowest tertile
of IGFBP-3, women in the highest tertile of IGFBP-3
were at lower risk of intermediate/late-stage colorectal
adenoma (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.85) and cancer
(RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.83). Neither IGF-1 nor
IGFBP-3 had any appreciable relation with early-stage
adenoma. These analyses indicate that high levels of
circulating IGF-1 and particularly low levels of IGFBP-3
are associated independently with an elevated risk of
large or tubulo-villous/villous colorectal adenoma and
cancer. These results are concordant with those obtained
previously in Physicians’ Health Study[35].
The role of IGFBP-3 in colorectal cancer was in-
dependently analyzed by Williams et al[36] IGFBP-3 has
been shown to enhance p53-dependent apoptosis after
DNA damage. Therefore, loss of IGFBP-3 could con-
tribute to the development of colonic adenomas that
retain wild-type p53 function through suppression of
p53-dependent apoptotic signals, allowing aberrant cell
survival and tumor formation. Furthermore there is dis-
ruption in both adenoma and carcinoma tissue. This pat-
tern is similar to that of TGF-β distribution in normal,
adenoma and carcinoma tissue[37]. Because it is known
that TGF-β is a potent growth inhibitor for colonic
epithelium[36], this similarity suggests that IGFBP-3 may
have an important role in the regulation of differentia-
tion and apoptosis in human colonic epithelium[37].
The role of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia
in colorectal cancer was directly assessed by Schoen
et al [27] in a study performed on 5849 participants in
the Cardiovascular Health Study cohort. The authors
identied 102 cases of colorectal cancer. Fasting insulin
was not related to an increased risk (RR = 1.2), whereas
2 h insulin was related to a signicantly increased risk
(RR = 2.0).
Giovannucci et al[38] found that BMI was not signicantly
5144 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2009 Volume 15 Number 41
www.wjgnet.com
associated with an increased risk of distal colon ad-
enoma irrespective of size, while WC and waist hip ratio
were strong risk factors for large distal colon adenomas
with diameter 1 cm but were unrelated to small ad-
enomas with diameter < 1 cm. The association of WC
with an increased risk of cancer has been reported to be
slightly stronger for distal colon cancer.
There are also several studies which determined
the relationship between C-peptide (an indicator of
insulin production) and the risk of colorectal cancer. As
mentioned before, in the Physicians’ Health Study, men
with C-peptide in the top vs the bottom quintile had a
2.7-fold significantly higher risk of colorectal cancer
after control for BMI and exercise; this RR increased
to 3.4 after the analysis was controlled for indicators of
the metabolic syndrome[28]. In a prospective study of
14 275 women in New York State, a 3-fold higher risk of
colorectal cancer was observed in those in the top quartile
of C-peptide, and a 4-fold higher risk was observed for
colon cancer alone[39].
Adipokines and inammatory cytokines
Adipose tissue is a complex endocrine organ, responsible
for the secretion and synthesis of hormones, cytokines
and other signaling proteins, collectively termed as
adipokines. Adipokines are a diverse group of signaling
molecules that play roles in such processes as appetite
and energy balance, inflammation, insulin resistance/
sensitivity, angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, cell proliferation
and atherosclerosis. Many of these functions are related
to either the metabolic syndrome or cancer, and they may
serve as a link between these two pathologies[40].
Adiponectin
Adiponectin, a 30-kDa complement C1q-related protein,
is a key regulator of insulin sensitivity and inammation
and modulates several physiologic processes, such as me-
tabolism of glucose and fatty acids. In contrast to other
adipokines such as leptin, adiponectin circulating levels
are decreased in obese individuals and in those with dia-
betes[41]. Decreased plasma adiponectin concentrations
are associated with insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and
atherosclerosis. In addition, it was recently shown that
adiponectin may play a role in the development and pro-
gression of various types of malignancies. Accumulating
evidence suggests that adiponectin is an important regu-
lator of cell proliferation. Adiponectin may act either
directly on cancer cells or indirectly by regulating whole-
body insulin sensitivity[42].
Mechanisms that may link adiponectin with
carcinogenesis
In obesity, reduced adiponectin levels lead to the devel-
opment of insulin resistance and compensatory, chronic
hyperinsulinaemia. Increased insulin levels results in in-
creased levels of bioavailable IGF-1. Insulin and IGF-1
signal through the insulin receptors and IGF1R, pro-
mote cellular proliferation and inhibit apoptosis in many
tissue types up-regulating the secretion of VEGF, con-
tributing thus to carcinogenesis[39]. Adiponectin has also
been shown to inhibit both the production of TNF-α
in macrophages and its action in endothelial cells, thus
promoting carcinogenesis through the altered effect of
TNF-α on tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis[43].
Adiponectin can also protect from carcinogenesis
through more direct effects.
Specifically, adiponectin has been found to be an
important negative regulator of hematopoiesis and the
immune system. Moreover, adiponectin may inhibit
activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), a transcription
factor that upregulates VEGF[44].
Several signalling molecules such as 50-AMP-activated
protein kinase (AMPK), NF-κB, peroxisome proliferators
activated receptor (PPAR)-α and p38 mitogen-activated
protein kinase are known to mediate adiponectin-induced
metabolic effects. AMPK might inhibit th e growth
and/or survival of cancer cells[45]. Finally, adiponectin
may also regulate angiogenesis negatively (independently
of AMPK) through induction of apoptosis in vascular
endothelial cells by activating the caspase cascade, a group
of apoptotic enzymes[46].
The relationship between circulating adiponectin
levels and colorectal cancer was demonstrated by several
clinical and experimental studies.
Ferroni et al[47] demonstrated in a study involving 60
patients with non metastatic colorectal cancer that low
adiponectin levels are inversely correlated with increases
in tumor stage and were independent predictors of
recurrent disease. Low adiponectin levels were found in
52% of relapsing patients, compared with 26% of non-
relapsing patients[47].
Similar results were obtained by Wei et al[48] in a
prospective case-control study of 18 225 men enrolled
in the Health Professional Follow-up Study. Over the
approximately 8 years of follow-up, the authors noted 25
cases of colorectal cancer in the 3645 men in the highest
category of adiponectin compared with 54 cases of
colorectal cancer in the 3645 men in the lowest quintile
of adiponectin.
Leptin
Leptin is a 16 kDa glycoprotein which is expressed
almost exclusively (> 95%) by adipocytes. Initial interest
in leptin focused on its role in obesity but recently leptin,
has been associated with the inflammatory response,
insulin signaling, and carcinogenesis.
Insulin and leptin interact at multiple levels within a
complex network of adipose tissue signaling pathways,
providing several mechanisms that could link leptin to
colon cancer.
Of particular importance for cancer is the inuence
of leptin on suppressors of cytokine signaling 1 and 3
which in turn limits insulin signaling[49].
Although data directly linking leptin to colon cancer
are limited, some studies have shown increased risk
of colon and colorectal cancer with high serum leptin
levels.
Data from a cohort study in Norway detected an
almost 3-fold increased risk of colon cancer among
people with high leptin levels, independently of BMI[50].
Pais R
et al
. Metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer 5145
www.wjgnet.com
Another study found that men in the highest tertile
of leptin concentrations had a 3.3-fold (95% CI: 1.2-8.7)
increased adenoma risk compared with those in the lowest
tertile[51]. The association between leptin concentration
and colorectal cancer was also evaluated in women, in a
case-control study conducted in Japan, suggesting that
leptin increases substantially the risk of female colorectal
cancer, independent of BMI[52].
Inammatory cytokines and colorectal cancer
Accumulating evidence suggests that systemic inflam-
mation might be a plausible mechanism for colon carci-
nogenesis. Studies have shown that genetic variations in
inflammation-related genes, such as interleukin (IL)-6,
IL-8, and IL-10, are associated with susceptibility to
colorectal cancer and adenomas.
IL-6 appears to enhance tumorigenesis by a paracrine
and autocrine mechanism, to stimulate cell growth and
inhibit apoptosis. Also IL-6 concentrations reflected
disease status and were commonly associated with
metastatic disease[53].
TNF-α activates NF-κB (by phosphorylation of its
inhibitor IκB), which increases production of NO, a
substrate for reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation,
and stimulates other inflammatory cytokines[54]. With
respect to cancer, ROS can damage DNA by several
processes including DNA base modication, deletions,
frame shifts, strand breaks, DNA-protein cross-links,
and chromosomal rearrangements. DNA damage can
occur in genes that are important in cell proliferation
(such as ras), or cell survival (such as p53), which can
then trigger cancer progression[55].
There are several studies which demonstrated the
correlation between high levels of IL-6, TNF-α, C-reac-
tive proteins (CRP) and colorectal carcinogenesis. More-
over, a Greek study demonstrated that high levels of
serum IL-6, TNF-α and CRP were correlated with larger
tumor size. The relation to tumor size could be related
to the fact, that larger tumors may trigger a more potent
immunological response manifested by the circulation of
proinammatory cytokines such as TNF-α[56].
PPAR-
γ
PPAR-γ, a ligand-activated transcription factor, is a key
regulator of adipogenic differentiation and glucose
homeostasis. PPAR-γ ligands have recently been dem-
onstrated to affect proliferation and differentiation in
cancer cell lines. A gradually increasing number of stud-
ies demonstrated the association between PPAR-γ and
colorectal cancer[57].
A recent study demonstrated a positive PPAR-γ
immunostaining in 48 of 86 cases of colon cancer (56%).
No association was found for PPAR-γ positivity with
different Dukes’ stages, histological grade of differentiation,
tumor locatio n, presence o f lymph node and liver
metastasis, venous invasion, or tumor cell proliferating
capacity assessed as Ki-67 overexpression. On the contrary,
PPAR-γ expression was statistically significant correlated
with the expression of cell cycle-related molecules[58].
Another recent study demonstrated that PPAR-γ
agonists have inhibitory effects on the proliferation of
colon cancer cell lines associated with G1 cell cycle arrest
and invasive activity. The latter effect is demonstrated
in certain cell lines through the down-regulation of
metalloproteinase-7 synthesis[59].
CONCLUSION
The association between metabolic syndrome and
colorectal cancer is now supported by a large number
of epidemiological studies[14,16,17,19,26]. The components
of metabolic syndrome appear to have an additive ef-
fect on colon cancer development acting through dif-
ferent pathophysiological pathways. This evidence is
based on studies of determinants of the metabolic
syndrome (obesity, abdominal distribution of adiposity,
physical inactivity), clinical consequences (type 2 diabe-
tes, hypertension) of this syndrome, plasma or serum
components of the definition of metabolic syndrome
(hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, low HDL choles-
terol), markers of hyperinsulinemia or insulin resistance
(insulin, C-peptide), and serum inammatory cytokines
levels in relation to colon cancer or adenoma risk. High
insulin and insulin resistance are common features of
industrialized societies characterized by a large preva-
lence of overweight individuals and obesity, a diet rich in
energy intake, and a lifestyle characterized by low calorie
expenditure. Understanding the pathological mechanism
that links metabolic syndrome and its components to
carcinogenesis has a very important clinical signicance.
Controlling even one or two of the components of the
metabolic syndrome may result in a longer, healthier and
cancer-free life. Public health efforts aimed at reducing
lifestyle patterns and dietary habits associated with this
imbalance on insulin metabolism may have profound
health benets on a number of diseases including can-
cer, that represent major causes of mortality and mor-
bidity in our societies.
REFERENCES
1 Zimmet P, Magliano D, Matsuzawa Y, Alberti G, Shaw J.
The metabolic syndrome: a global public health problem
and a new denition. J Atheroscler Thromb 2005; 12: 295-300
2 Vague J. La differenciation sexuelle, facteur determinant
des formes de l’obesite. Presse Med 1947; 55: 339
3 Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel
RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith
SC Jr, Spertus JA, Costa F. Diagnosis and management of
the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific
Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735-2752
4 Ka hn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic
syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement
from the American Diabetes Association and the European
Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:
2289-2304
5 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence
and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA
2002; 288: 1723-1727
6 Martínez MA, Puig JG, Mora M, Aragón R, O'Dogherty P,
Antón JL, Sánchez-Villares T, Rubio JM, Rosado J, Torres
5146 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2009 Volume 15 Number 41
www.wjgnet.com
R, Marcos J, Pallardo LF, Banegas JR. Metabolic syndrome:
prevalence, associated factors, and C-reactive protein: the
MADRIC (MADrid RIesgo Cardiovascular) Study. Metabolism
2008; 57: 1232-1240
7 Hildrum B, Mykletun A, Hole T, Midthjell K, Dahl AA.
Age-specic prevalence of the metabolic syndrome dened
by the International Diabetes Federation and the National
Cholesterol Education Program: the Norwegian HUNT 2
study. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 220
8 Cameron AJ, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome:
prevalence in worldwide populations. Endocrinol Metab Clin
North Am 2004; 33: 351-375, table of contents
9 Ninomiya JK, L'Italien G, Criqui MH, Whyte JL, Gamst A,
Chen RS. Association of the metabolic syndrome with history of
myocardial infarction and stroke in the Third National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circulation 2004; 109: 42-46
10 Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic
syndrome. Lancet 2005; 365: 1415-1428
11 Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F,
McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L. Effect of
potentially modiable risk factors associated with myocardial
infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-
control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937-952
12 Kreger BE, Splansky GL, Schatzkin A. The cancer experience
in the Framingham Heart Study cohort. Cancer 1991; 67: 1-6
13 Boyle P, Leon ME. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Br
Med Bull 2002; 64: 1-25
14 Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue
M, Boyle P, editors. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol.
IX. IARC Scientic Publications No. 160, Lyon, IARC, 2007.
Available from: URL: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/CI5_IX_frame.
htm
15 Garow D. Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for
colorectal cancer in the United States. American College of
Gastroenterology 2008 Annual Scientific Meeting. October 6,
2008
16 Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ.
Ov er weight, o besity, a nd morta lit y from ca ncer in a
prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med
2003; 348: 1625-1638
17 Ahmed RL, Schmitz KH, Anderson KE, Rosamond WD,
Folsom AR. The metabolic syndrome and risk of incident
colorectal cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 28-36
18 Trevisan M, Liu J, Muti P, Misciagna G, Menotti A, Fucci F.
Markers of insulin resistance and colorectal cancer mortality.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001; 10: 937-941
19 Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, Luben R, Welch A,
Day N. Preliminary communication: glycated hemoglobin,
diabetes, and incident colorectal cancer in men and women:
a prospective analysis from the European prospective
investigation into cancer-Norfolk study. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 915-919
20 Saydah SH, Platz EA, Rifai N, Pollak MN, Brancati FL,
Helzlsouer KJ. Association of markers of insulin and glucose
control with subsequent colorectal cancer risk. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 412-418
21 Stocks T, Lukanova A, Johansson M, Rinaldi S, Palmqvist
R, Hallmans G, Kaaks R, Stattin P. Components of
the metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer risk; a
prospective study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 304-314
22 Pischon T, Lahmann PH, Boeing H, Friedenreich C, Norat
T, Tjønneland A, Halkjaer J, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F,
Boutron-Ruault MC, Guernec G, Bergmann MM, Linseisen
J, Becker N, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Sieri S, Palli
D, Tumino R, Vineis P, Panico S, Peeters PH, Bueno-de-
Mesquita HB, Boshuizen HC, Van Guelpen B, Palmqvist
R, Berglund G, Gonzalez CA, Dorronsoro M, Barricarte
A, Navarro C, Martinez C, Quirós JR, Roddam A, Allen
N, Bingham S, Khaw KT, Ferrari P, Kaaks R, Slimani N,
Riboli E. Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in
the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and
Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 920-931
23 Moore LL, Bradlee ML, Singer MR, Splansky GL, Proctor
MH, Ellison RC, Kreger BE. BMI and waist circumference
as predictors of lifetime colon cancer risk in Framingham
Study adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 559-567
24 Otake S, Tak ed a H, Suz uki Y, Fukui T , W at anabe S,
Ishihama K, Saito T, Togashi H, Nakamura T, Matsuzawa
Y, Kawata S. Association of visceral fat accumulation and
plasma adiponectin with colorectal adenoma: evidence for
participation of insulin resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:
3642-3646
25 Hamoudi WTY, Dumitrascu DL. Is there an association
between coronary heart disease and colorectal carcinoma?
Results from a pilot study. Rom J Gastroenterol 1997; 6: 13-16
26 Colangelo LA, Gapstur SM, Gann PH, Dyer AR, Liu K.
Colorectal cancer mortality and factors related to the insulin
resistance syndrome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;
11: 385-391
27 Schoen RE, Tangen CM, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Cushman
M, Tracy RP, Dobs A, Savage PJ. Increased blood glucose
and insulin, body size, and incident colorectal cancer. J Natl
Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1147-1154
28 Ma J, Giovannucci E, Pollak M, Leavitt A, Tao Y, Gaziano
JM, Stampfer MJ. A prospective study of plasma C-peptide
and colorectal cancer risk in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:
546-553
29 Wei EK, Ma J, Pollak MN, Rifai N, Fuchs CS, Hankinson
SE, Giovannucci E. C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor
binding protein-1, glycosylated hemoglobin, and the risk
of distal colorectal adenoma in women. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 750-755
30 Sandhu MS, Dunger DB, Giovannucci EL. Insulin, insulin-
like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding proteins, their
biologic interactions, and colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
2002; 94: 972-980
31 Grimberg A, Cohen P. Role of insulin-like growth factors and
their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis.
J Cell Physiol 2000; 183: 1-9
32 Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, Ferrara N, Donner DB.
Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor by insulin-
like growth factor 1 in colorectal carcinoma. J Biol Chem
1996; 271: 29483-29488
33 Jenkins PJ. Acromegaly and cancer. Horm Res 2004; 62
Suppl 1: 108-115
34 Giovannucci E, Pollak MN, Platz EA, Willett WC, Stampfer
MJ, Majeed N, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. A
prospective study of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1
and binding protein-3 and risk of colorectal neoplasia in
women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9: 345-349
35 Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, Chan JM, Tao Y,
Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. Prospective study of colorectal
cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth
factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst
1999; 91: 620-625
36 Williams AC, Collard TJ, Perks CM, Newcomb P, Moorghen
M, Holly JM, Paraskeva C. Increased p53-dependent
apoptosis by the insulin-like growth factor binding protein
IGFBP-3 in human colonic adenoma-derived cells. Cancer
Res 2000; 60: 22-27
37 Barnard JA, Beauchamp RD, Coffey RJ, Moses HL.
Regulation of intestinal epithelial cell growth by transforming
growth factor type beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:
1578-1582
38 Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA,
Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk
for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med 1995;
122: 327-334
39 Kaaks R, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, Lukanova A, Biessy
C, Dechaud H, Rinaldi S, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Shore RE,
Riboli E. Serum C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I,
IGF-binding proteins, and colorectal cancer risk in women. J
Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1592-1600
40 Cowey S, Hardy RW. The metabolic syndrome: A high-risk
Pais R
et al
. Metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer 5147
www.wjgnet.com
state for cancer? Am J Pathol 2006; 169: 1505-1522
41 Vona-Davis L, Howard-McNatt M, Rose DP. Adiposity,
type 2 diabetes and the met abo lic synd rom e in bre ast
cancer. Obes Rev 2007; 8: 395-408
42 Ba rb D, Williams CJ, Neuwirth AK, Mantzoros CS.
Adiponectin in relation to malignancies: a review of existing
basic research and clinical evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86:
s858-s866
43 Rose DP, Komninou D, Stephenson GD. Obesity, adipo-
cytokines, and insulin resistance in breast cancer. Obes Rev
2004; 5: 153-165
44 Wang Y, Lam KS, Xu JY, Lu G, Xu LY, Cooper GJ, Xu A.
Adiponectin inhibits cell proliferation by interacting with
several growth factors in an oligomerization-dependent
manner. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 18341-18347
45 Goldstein BJ, Scalia R. Adiponectin: A novel adipokine
linking adipocytes and vascular function. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2004; 89: 2563-2568
46 Bråkenhielm E, Veitonmäki N, Cao R, Kihara S, Matsuzawa
Y, Zhivotovsky B, Funahashi T, Cao Y. Adiponectin-induced
antiangiogenesis and antitumor activity involve caspase-
mediated endothelial cell apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
2004; 101: 2476-2481
47 Ferroni P, Palmirotta R, Spila A, Martini F, Raparelli V,
Fossile E, Mariotti S, Del Monte G, Buonomo O, Roselli M,
Guadagni F. Prognostic significance of adiponectin levels
in non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2007; 27:
483-489
48 Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, Willett WC, Mantzoros
CS. Low plasma adiponectin levels and risk of colorectal
cancer in men: a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;
97: 1688-1694
49 Slattery ML, Wolff RK, Herrick J, Caan BJ, Potter JD. Leptin
and leptin receptor genotypes and colon cancer: gene-
gene and gene-lifestyle interactions. Int J Cancer 2008; 122:
1611-1617
50 Stattin P, Lukanova A, Biessy C, Söderberg S, Palmqvist R,
Kaaks R, Olsson T, Jellum E. Obesity and colon cancer: does
leptin provide a link? Int J Cancer 2004; 109: 149-152
51 Chia VM, Newcomb PA, Lampe JW, White E, Mandelson
MT, McTiernan A, Potter JD. Leptin concentrations, leptin
receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal adenoma risk.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 2697-2703
52 Tamakoshi K, Toyoshima H, Wakai K, Kojima M, Suzuki K,
Watanabe Y, Hayakawa N, Yatsuya H, Kondo T, Tokudome
S, Hashim oto S, Suzuki S , Kawado M, Oza sa K, Ito Y,
Tamakoshi A. Leptin is associated with an increased female
colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study in Japan.
Oncology 2005; 68: 454-461
53 Chung YC, Chang YF. Serum interleukin-6 levels reflect
the disease status of colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2003; 83:
222-226
54 Sonnenberg GE, Krakower GR, Kissebah AH. A novel
pathway to the manifestations of metabolic syndrome. Obes
Res 2004; 12: 180-186
55 Valko M, Izakovic M, Mazur M, Rhodes CJ, Telser J. Role of
oxygen radicals in DNA damage and cancer incidence. Mol
Cell Biochem 2004; 266: 37-56
56 Nikiteas NI, Tzanakis N, Gazouli M, Rallis G, Daniilidis
K, Theodoropoulos G, Kostakis A, Peros G. Serum IL-6,
TNFalpha and CRP levels in Greek colorectal cancer patients:
prognostic implications. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11:
1639-1643
57 Fajas L, Debril MB, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor-gamma: from adipogenesis to carcinogenesis. J Mol
Endocrinol 2001; 27: 1-9
58 The ocharis S, Giaginis C, Parasi A, Margeli A, Kakisis
J, Agapitos E, Kouraklis G. Expression of peroxisome
pro liferator-activated rece ptor-gamma in colon cancer:
correlation with histopathological parameters, cell cycle-
related molecules, and patients' survival. Dig Dis Sci 2007;
52: 2305-2311
59 Sh en D, De ng C, Zhang M . Perox isome p ro lifer at or-
activated receptor gamma agonists inhibit the proliferation
and invasion of human colon cancer cells. Postgrad Med J
2007; 83: 414-419
S- Editor Li LF L- Editor O’Neill M E- Editor Zheng XM
5148 ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R World J Gastroenterol November 7, 2009 Volume 15 Number 41
... In addition to the cancer stage, other clinical, pathologic, and laboratory parameters have been suggested to predict prognostic information in colorectal cancer patients. Metabolic syndrome is a prognostic factor associated with outcomes in colorectal cancer patients across age groups [54,55]. The component of the syndrome associated most consistently with adverse outcomes is glucose intolerance and diabetes [54,56]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: An increasing proportion of the population of patients with cancer presents at an advanced age, increasing the challenges of successful and well-tolerated treatments. In the older spectrum of the geriatric cancer patients, those older than 80 years old, challenges are even higher because of increasing comorbidities and decreasing organ function reserves. Methods: Studies regarding colorectal cancer presentation, treatment, and prognosis in patients older than 80 years old available in the literature were evaluated and were compiled within a narrative review. Molecular attributes of colorectal cancer in the subset of patients older than 80 years old in published genomic cohorts were also reviewed and were compared with similar attributes in younger patients. Results: Characteristics of colorectal cancer in octogenarians are in many aspects similar to younger patients, but patients older than 80 years old present more often with right colon cancers. Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in selected patients over 80 years old is feasible and should be pursued. Adjuvant chemotherapy is under-utilized in this population. Although combination chemotherapy is in most cases not advisable, monotherapy with fluoropyrimidine derivatives is feasible and efficacious. Conclusions: Outcomes of colorectal cancer patients over the age of 80 years old may be optimized with a combination of standard treatments adjusted to the individual patient’s functional status and organ reserves. Increased support for the older age group during their colorectal cancer treatment modalities would improve oncologic outcomes with decreasing adverse outcomes of therapies.
... MetS as a chronic inflammatory disease might create a pro-cancer environment and increase cancer incidence. Several epidemiological studies suggest that MetS and its components may independently or in combination increase the risk of several types of cancer, such as pancreatic cancer [6,7], colorectal cancer [8][9][10], post-menopausal breast cancer [11][12][13], and liver cancer [14] playing a carcinogenic role in cancers. However, the studies on the association between MetS and GC risk are limited and contradictory. ...
Article
Background: Previous studies suggested that metabolic syndrome (MetS) might create a pro-cancer environment and increase cancer incidence. However, evidence on the risk of gastric cancer (GC) was limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between MetS and its components and GC in the Korean population. Methods: Included were 108,397 individuals who participated in the large-scale prospective cohort study, the Health Examinees-Gem study during 2004-2017. The multivariable Cox proportional was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on the association between MetS and its components with GC risk. Age was used as the time scale in the analyses. The stratified analysis was performed to determine the joint effect of lifestyle factors and MetS on GC risk in different groups. Results: During the mean follow-up of 9.1 years, 759 cases of newly diagnosed cancer (408 men and 351 women) were identified. Overall, participants with MetS had a 26% increased risk of GC than those without MetS (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.07-1.47); the risk increased with the number of MetS components (p for trend 0.01). Hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-cholesterol, and hyperglycemia were independently associated with the risk of GC. The potential joint effect of MetS and current smokers (p for interaction 0.02) and obesity (BMI ≥ 25.0) (p for interaction 0.03) in GC. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, we found that MetS were associated with an increased risk of GC in the Korean population. Our findings suggest that MetS may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for GC risk.
... Lastly, we were, to date, the first study to use a novel, portable 3D body scanner, Styku S100 (Styku LLC, Los Angeles, CA), to assess body composition, including fat mass and fat percentage, in rural community settings. Measures of body composition, especially body fat, are relevant to assessing cancer risk, as adiposity deposition is associated with inflammation and carcinogenesis [62,63]. Among the handful of completed or recently awarded lifestyle weight loss trials in rural populations, none measured body composition [64,65]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Weight loss through lifestyle modification can produce health benefits and may reduce cancer risk. The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of and adherence to a 15-week telephone-based weight loss intervention in rural Ohio, an area with high rates of obesity. Methods This pilot 2-arm randomized controlled study was designed for rural Ohio residents who were overweight or obese. Eligible participants were 2:1 randomly assigned to either a 15-week weight loss intervention group or active control group. The weight loss intervention group received weekly telephone sessions to improve healthy diet and increase physical activity. The active control group received education brochures with information on physical activity and dietary guidelines. Feasibility was defined as at least 80% of participants completing the follow-up surveys, and acceptable adherence was defined as the percentage of participants in the weight loss group who attend ≥75% of weekly telephone sessions. Results A total of 423 individuals entered the online screening survey, 215 (50.8%) completed the survey, and 98 (45.6%) of those were eligible. Forty eligible individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to the weight loss group (n = 27) or active control group (n = 13). The average age of the weight loss group was 49 (SD = 10) years, and 89% were female. The average age of the active control group was 51 (SD = 9) years, and 92% were female. Feasibility was demonstrated: 90% of participants completed the online follow-up surveys at 15-weeks. Among participants in the weight loss group, 22 out of 27 (81.5%) completed the 15-week intervention, the average number of sessions attended was 9.7 (64.9%). Adherence to the intervention was rated as acceptable among almost half of the group (48.1%). Conclusions Feasibility of a 15-week telephone-based weight loss study among rural residents with overweight/obesity were determined. A future study will test this intervention for weight loss efficacy.
... Obese and diabetic mice with colorectal lesions are at greater risk for the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer [30]. To investigate the potential effect of TBF on colonic lesions in diabetic mice, we used H&E staining. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tartary buckwheat flavonoids (TBFs) exhibit diverse biological activities, with antioxidant, antidiabetes, anti-inflammatory, and cholesterol-lowering properties. In this study, we investigated the role of TBFs in attenuating glucose and lipid disturbances in diabetic mice and hence preventing the occurrence of diabetes-related colon lesions in mice by regulating the gut microbiota. The results showed that TBFs (1) reversed blood glucose levels and body weight changes; (2) improved levels of serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and fasting insulin; and (3) significantly reduced diabetes-related colon lesions in diabetic mice. In addition, TBFs also affected the diabetes-related imbalance of the gut microbiota and enriched beneficial microbiota, including Akkermansia and Prevotella. The TBF also selectively increased short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria, including Roseburia and Odoribacter, and decreased the abundance of the diabetes-related gut microbiota, including Escherichia, Mucispirillum, and Bilophila. The correlation analysis indicated that TBFs improved metabolic parameters related to key communities of the gut microbiota. Our data suggested that TBFs alleviated glucose and lipid disturbances and improved colon lesions in diabetic mice, possibly by regulating the community composition of the gut microbiota. This regulation of the gut microbiota composition may explain the observed effects of TBFs to alleviate diabetes-related symptoms.
... MS or its components are strongly correlated with cancer incidence risk and mortality. It has shown to increase the incidence of liver [10,11], colorectal [12][13][14], pancreatic [15], endometrial [16], and breast cancer [17,18]. MS component diabetes mellitus is also close associated to cancer risk [19], and abdominal obesity is notably correlated with higher risk and mortality of most common cancers [20]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background There are limited evidences clarifying the impact of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components on head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence risk. We explored the correlation between MS, MS components, and the combined effects of MS and C-reactive protein (CRP) and HNC risk. Methods This is a prospective analysis of 474,929 participants from the UK Biobank cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and to explore the non-linear correlation between an individual MS component and HNC risk. Results Individuals with MS (HR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.90–1.22) had no higher HNC risk than those without MS. More MS components showed no higher HNC risk. Nevertheless, hyperglycemia (HR, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.02–1.45) was independently correlated with elevated HNC risk. In a non-linear manner, waist circumference and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) showed a U-shaped association with HNC risk. Further, piecewise linear model analysis indicated that higher male waist circumference, female waist circumference (≥93.16 cm), blood glucose (≥4.70 mmol/L) and male HDL-C (≥1.26mmo/L), and lower male HDL-C (<1.26mmo/L) were correlated with higher HNC risk. Increased CRP (≥1.00mg/dL) elevated HNC risk and individuals with MS and CRP≥1.00mg/dL had the highest HNC risk (HR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.05–1.58). But no joint effect between MS and CRP was detected (p-interaction=0.501). Conclusions MS are not correlated with elevated HNC risk. High waist circumference and blood glucose are independent risk factor of HNC incidence. Controlling HDL-C in an appropriate range can get the lowest risk of male HNC. No joint effect of MS and CRP exists in HNC tumorigenesis.
... Adiponectin is considered as an important link between colon cancer and obesity [57,58]. It was also observed that low expression of adiponectin and high expression of its receptors may be linked with invasive breast cancer [59,60]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Adiponectin (a protein consisting of 244 amino acids and characterized by a molecular weight of 28 kDa) is a cytokine that is secreted from adipose tissues (adipokine). Available evidence suggests that adiponectin is involved in a variety of physiological functions, molecular and cellular events, including lipid metabolism, energy regulation, immune response and inflammation, and insulin sensitivity. It has a protective effect on neurons and neural stem cells. Adiponectin levels have been reported to be negatively correlated with cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, and shown to be affected (i.e., significantly increased) by proper healthy nutrition. The present review comprehensively overviews the role of adiponectin in a range of diseases, showing that it can be used as a biomarker for diagnosing these disorders as well as a target for monitoring the effectiveness of preventive and treatment interventions.
Article
Gastric cancer (GC), a prevalent disease in Asian countries, presents a substantial global health challenge. The risk factors for GC include Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, smoking, alcohol, and metabolic syndrome (MetS). This review meticulously examines the intricate connections between MetS and GC, focusing on visceral adipocytes, hormonal factors, obesity, and their impact on survival outcomes. Visceral adipocytes, which secrete inflammatory cytokines and hormones, play a pivotal role in influencing cancer development. Hormonal factors demonstrate nuanced associations with specific GC subtypes, underscoring the complexity of their impact. Large-scale studies exploring obesity-related factors reveal sex-specific nuances and underscore the importance of considering overall weight and body composition. Furthermore, the review explores the impact of eradication therapy for H. pylori infection, which is the most significant factor in the onset of GC, on the components of MetS. Additionally, the influence of MetS on postoperative outcomes and survival in GC patients highlights the interplay between therapeutic interventions and lifestyle factors. This comprehensive exploration sheds light on the multifaceted relationship between MetS and GC, providing valuable insights for future research and preventive strategies.
Article
Full-text available
O diabetes mellitus (DM) é um problema de saúde mundial que atingiu níveis alarmantes, onde quase meio bilhão de pessoas vivem com a doença atualmente. Diversos tratamentos são usados para o controle do DM, seja a monoterapia ou associações terapêuticas, dentre estes inclui-se o uso de antidiabéticos orais e fitoterápicos. Nesse contexto a cúrcuma surge como uma alternativa terapêutica potencial como adjuvante no tratamento do DM. Com suas ações antioxidantes, anti-inflamatórias e hipoglicêmicas, a cúrcuma longa demonstra atividade não só no controle do diabetes mellitus tipo 2, mas também em suas complicações como a nefropatia diabética. A biodisponibilidade por via oral da cúrcuma enfrenta adversidades por conta da sua baixa absorção, distribuição tecidual limitada, meia-vida curta e rápida velocidade de biotransformação hepática, sendo este um fator limitante para aprovação clínica. O artigo faz uma revisão atual sobre os principais aspectos do uso da cúrcuma como adjuvante no tratamento do DM e conclui que esta planta apresenta propriedades benéficas aos pacientes diabéticos.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeFew studies have been conducted on the association between oral cavity cancer and metabolic diseases. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between oral cavity cancer and metabolic diseases.Methods This cohort study used the database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service, which contains medical data of 97% of the Korean population. Oral cavity cancer occurred in a total of 2718 patients. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to IDF criteria. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used.ResultsThe HR for oral cavity cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome was 1.113(95% CI 1.006–1.232), which was significantly higher than that in normal patients, especially in males (p = 0.0386). When the number of metabolic syndrome factors was ≥ 3, the HR of oral cavity cancer was 1.191(95% CI 1.026–1.383), which was significantly higher than that of 0 metabolic syndrome factors, especially in males (p = 0.0218). When the number of metabolic syndrome factors was ≥ 3, the HR for oral cavity cancer was 1.439(95% CI 1.066–1.942), which was significantly higher than that of 0 metabolic syndrome factors, especially in males aged < 50 years (p = 0.0173).Conclusion Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of oral cavity cancer only in males. In addition, the incidence of oral cavity cancer increased as the number of factors constituting metabolic syndrome increased, only in young males aged < 50 years. Thus, metabolic syndrome is an important risk factor for oral cavity cancer, particularly in young males.
Article
Full-text available
Background Adipocyte-derived adiponectin may play a role in the host inflammatory response to cancer. We examined the association of plasma adiponectin with the density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon cancers, and with vitamin D, clinicopathological features and patient survival. Methods Plasma adiponectin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were analyzed by radioimmunoassay in 600 patients with stage III colon cancer who received FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy [NCCTG N0147 (Alliance)]. TIL densities were determined in histopathological sections. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS), time-to-recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for potential confounders (ie, BMI, race, TILs, and N stage). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results We found a statistically significant reduction in adiponectin, but not 25(OH)D, levels in tumors with high vs low TIL densities (median = 6,845 vs 8,984 ng/ml; P=.04). A statistically significantly reduction in adiponectin was also observed in obese (BMI >30 kg/m) vs non obese patients (median = 6,608 vs 12,351 ng/ml, P < .001), in men vs women (median = 8,185 vs 11,567 ng/ml; P < .001), in Blacks vs Whites or Asians (median = 6,412 vs 8,847 vs 7,858 ng/ml; P < .03), and in those with fewer lymph node metastases (N1 vs N2: median = 7,768 vs 9,253 ng/ml; P =.01). Insufficiency of 25(OH)D (< 30 ng/ml) was detected in 291 (48.5%) patients. In multivariable analyses, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D were associated with a statistically significant difference in DFS, OS, or TTR in models adjusted for potential confounders. We found a statistically significant association of TILs with prognosis, yet no such interaction was observed for the association of adiponectin with TILs for DFS. Conclusions Lower circulating adiponectin levels were associated with a statistically significant increase in TIL densities in colon cancers, indicating an enhanced anti-tumor immune response. In contrast to TILs, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D were independently prognostic.
Article
Full-text available
Aim. To study the putative association between coronary heart disease and colorectal carcinoma. Subjects. All patients with colorectal carcinoma diagnosed in the 3rd Medical and Surgical Department of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy from Cluj in the first 6 months of 1996 were included in the study. Methods. Prevalence of coronary heart disease and of the main risk factors for both coronary heart disease and colorectal carcinoma: fat intake and smoking were estimated and compared with similar data from an age and sex matched control group. Results. 63 patients were diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma. Coronary heart disease was detected in 58% of patients with colorectal carcinoma and in 44.7% controls. There was no statistical association between coronary heart disease and colorectal carcinoma (OR: 1.758). However, in males over 60, a marginal statistical association was found between coronary heart disease and colorectal carcinoma (OR: 4.500; p: 0.09). There was no difference between high fat intake, hyperlipoproteinemia and smoking between the two groups. Conclusion. There is no statistical association between colorectal carcinoma and coronary heart disease, nor between colorectal carcinoma and the main determinants of coronary heart disease. However, older males with coronary heart disease have a slightly elevated risk of colorectal carcinoma.
Article
Adiponectin, an adipocyte-secreted hormone that plays an important role in diabetes and cardiovascular disease, may also be of importance in the development and progression of several malignancies. Circulating adiponectin concentrations, which are determined mainly by genetic factors, nutrition, and adiposity, are lower in patients with breast, endometrial, prostate, and colon cancer. It has thus been proposed that adiponectin may be a biological link between obesity (especially central obesity) and increased cancer risk. Adiponectin may influence cancer risk through its well-recognized effects on insulin resistance, but it is also plausible that adiponectin acts on tumor cells directly. Several cancer cell types express adiponectin receptors that may mediate the effects of adiponectin on cellular proliferation. Herein, we review recent evidence supporting a role of serum adiponectin concentrations as a novel risk factor and possible diagnostic marker for obesity-related malignancies, including cancers of the breast, endometrium, colon, and prostate. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the potential role of adiponectin in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
Conference Paper
Adiponectin, an adipocyte-secreted hormone that plays an important role in diabetes and cardiovascular disease, may also be of importance in the development and progression of several malignancies. Circulating adiponectin concentrations, which are determined mainly by genetic factors, nutrition, and adiposity, are lower in patients with breast, endometrial, prostate, and colon cancer. It has thus been proposed that adiponectin may be a biological link between obesity (especially central obesity) and increased cancer risk. Adiponectin may influence cancer risk through its well-recognized effects on insulin resistance, but it is also plausible that adiponectin acts on tumor cells directly. Several cancer cell types express adiponectin receptors that may mediate the effects of adiponectin on cellular proliferation. Herein, we review recent evidence supporting a role of serum adiponectin concentrations as a novel risk factor and possible diagnostic marker for obesity-related malignancies, including cancers of the breast, endometrium, colon, and prostate. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the potential role of adiponectin in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
Article
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear hormone receptors, initially described as molecular targets for synthetic compounds inducing peroxisome proliferation. PPAR-, the best characterized of the PPARs, plays a crucial role in adipogenesis and insulin sensitization. Furthermore, PPAR- has been reported to affect cell proliferation/ differentiation pathways in various malignancies. We discuss in the present review recent advances in the understanding of the function of PPAR- in both cell
Article
Secular changes and worldwide variations in incidence rates of colorectal cancer, along with results from twin and migrant studies, provide compelling evidence that environmental factors influence the risk of this disease. Among the most important of these factors are diet and associated factors, such as physical activity and body size. Recent data suggest that dietary and related factors may influence colorectal cancer risk via their effects on serum insulin concentrations and on the bioavailability of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Epidemiologic studies have shown that IGF-I is positively associated with the risk of colorectal cancer, and experimental studies have shown that IGF-I has mitogenic and antiapoptotic actions on colorectal cancer cells. IGF-I bioactivity is regulated in part by its six binding proteins (IGFBP-1 to IGFBP-6); insulin inhibits the production of IGFBP-1 and perhaps IGFBP-2. As a result, chronically elevated fasting and postprandial insulin levels may lead to a decrease in circulating IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations and, consequently, an increase in IGF-I bioavailability. Insulin may also increase the circulating IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio by increasing hepatic growth hormone sensitivity. The increased IGF-I bioavailability may, over time, increase the risk of colorectal cancer. This new evidence for biologic interactions among insulin, IGF-I, and IGFBPs in the context of colorectal carcinogenesis provides a potential mechanism through which diet and associated factors may increase the risk of this cancer. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:972–80]
Article
Background: Leading a Western lifestyle, being overweight, and being sedentary are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Recent theories propose that the effects of these risk factors may be mediated by increases in circulating insulin levels and in the bioactivity of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a case-control study nested within a cohort of 14 275 women in New York. Methods: We used blood samples that had been obtained from these women from March 1985 through June 1991 and stored in a biorepository. C-peptide (a marker for insulin secretion), IGF-I, and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs)-1, -2, and -3 were assayed in the serum of 102 women who subsequently developed colorectal cancer and 200 matched control subjects. Logistic regression was used to relate cancer risk to these peptide levels, by adjustment for other risk factors. All statistical tests used are two-sided. Results: Colorectal cancer risk increased with increasing levels of C-peptide (P trend = .001), up to an odds ratio (OR) of 2.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26-6.75) for the highest versus the lowest quintiles, after adjustment for smoking. For colon cancer alone (75 case subjects and 146 control subjects), ORs increased up to 3.96 (95% CI = 1.49-10.50; P trend <.001) for the highest versus the lowest quintiles. A statistically significant decrease in colorectal cancer risk was observed for increasing levels of IGFBP-1 (P trend =.02; OR in the upper quintile = 0.48 [95% CI = 0.23-1.00]), as well as for the highest quintile of IGFBP-2 levels (P trend =.06; OR = 0.38 [95% CI = 0.15-0.94]). Colorectal cancer risk showed a modest but statistically nonsignificant positive association with levels of IGF-I and was statistically significantly increased for the highest quintile of IGFBP-3 (OR = 2.46 [95% CI = 1.09-5.57]). Conclusions: Chronically high levels of circulating insulin and IGFs associated with a Western lifestyle may increase colorectal cancer risk, possibly by decreasing IGFBP-1 and increasing the bioactivity of IGF-I.