ArticlePDF Available

Headache following vaccination against COVID-19 among healthcare workers with a history of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional study in Iran with a meta-analytic review of the literature

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background There is evidence of the occurrence of headache after vaccination against COVID-19. However, only a few studies have examined the headache characteristics and related determinants, especially among healthcare workers with a history of COVID-19 infection. Methods We evaluated the incidence of headaches after injection of different types of COVID-19 vaccine to determine factors relating to the incidence of headache after vaccination among the Iranian healthcare workers who had previously contracted COVID-19. A group of 334 healthcare workers with a history of COVID-19 infection were included and vaccinated (at least one month after recovery without any COVID-19 related symptoms) with different COVID-19 vaccines. The baseline information, headache characteristics and vaccine specifications were recorded. Results Overall, 39.2% reported experiencing a post-vaccination headache. Of those with a previous history of headache, 51.1% reported migraine-type, 27.4% tension-type and 21.5% other types. The mean time between vaccination and headache appearance was 26.78 ± 6.93 h, with the headache appearing less than 24 h after vaccination in most patients (83.2%). The headaches reached its peak within 8.62 ± 2.41 h. Most patients reported a compression-type headache. The prevalence of post-vaccination headaches was significantly different according to the type of vaccine used. The highest rates were reported for AstraZeneca, followed by Sputnik V. In regression analysis, the vaccine brand, female gender and initial COVID-19 severity were the main determinants for predicting post-vaccination headache. Conclusion Participants commonly experienced a headache following vaccination against COVID-19. Our study results indicated that this was slightly more common in females and in those with a history of severe COVID-19 infection.
Content may be subject to copyright.
RESEARCH Open Access
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00363-4 Head & Face Medicine
*Correspondence:
Mansoureh Togha
togha1961@gmail.com
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
Background There is evidence of the occurrence of headache after vaccination against COVID-19. However, only
a few studies have examined the headache characteristics and related determinants, especially among healthcare
workers with a history of COVID-19 infection.
Methods We evaluated the incidence of headaches after injection of different types of COVID-19 vaccine to
determine factors relating to the incidence of headache after vaccination among the Iranian healthcare workers who
had previously contracted COVID-19. A group of 334 healthcare workers with a history of COVID-19 infection were
included and vaccinated (at least one month after recovery without any COVID-19 related symptoms) with different
COVID-19 vaccines. The baseline information, headache characteristics and vaccine specifications were recorded.
Results Overall, 39.2% reported experiencing a post-vaccination headache. Of those with a previous history of
headache, 51.1% reported migraine-type, 27.4% tension-type and 21.5% other types. The mean time between
vaccination and headache appearance was 26.78 ± 6.93 h, with the headache appearing less than 24 h after
vaccination in most patients (83.2%). The headaches reached its peak within 8.62 ± 2.41 h. Most patients reported
a compression-type headache. The prevalence of post-vaccination headaches was significantly different according
to the type of vaccine used. The highest rates were reported for AstraZeneca, followed by Sputnik V. In regression
analysis, the vaccine brand, female gender and initial COVID-19 severity were the main determinants for predicting
post-vaccination headache.
Conclusion Participants commonly experienced a headache following vaccination against COVID-19. Our study
results indicated that this was slightly more common in females and in those with a history of severe COVID-19
infection.
Keywords COVID-19, Vaccination, Post-vaccination headache
Headache following vaccination against
COVID-19 among healthcare workers
with a history of COVID-19 infection: a cross-
sectional study in Iran with a meta-analytic
review of the literature
Somayeh Nasergivehchi1,2, Mansoureh Togha1,3* , Elham Jafari1, Mehrdad Sheikhvatan4,5 and Donya Shahamati6
Page 2 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
Introduction
With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in December
2019, efforts began to provide effective and safe drugs
to treat the disease and prevent its development. In line
with what has been observed in previous pandemics, the
efforts to produce effective vaccines increased rapidly. A
few months after the start of such efforts and with the
rapid spread of COVID-19 and its variants, the first gen-
erations of effective immunogenic vaccines were intro-
duced and gradually approved by international scientific
reference committees, including the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Orga-
nization (WHO) [1, 2].
It did not take long to generate various brands of vac-
cines in countries such as the United States, China,
Germany, Japan, India, Russia, and even in developing
countries such as Iran and Cuba, and introduce them to
the world [35]. However, as the production and com-
mercialization of these vaccines accelerated, concerns
arose. First, with the emergence of COVID-19 variants,
especially the Delta strain, concern increased about
reduced immunogenicity against the virus variants. e
protective effects of some vaccines initially having an
immunogenicity level of over 90% were seen to decrease
to less than 70% [6, 7]. More importantly, following inoc-
ulation with various vaccine brands against COVID-19,
potential and, rarely, life-threatening side effects were
reported. Common side effects for the COVID-19-vac-
cines included local inflammation, headache, muscle
pain, nausea, fatigue, fever and chills [8]. Anaphylaxis,
thromboembolic events, myocarditis, pericarditis and
even death were rarely reported, but seriously called into
question the safety of some brands [9].
One of the most common side effects following injec-
tion of the different brands of COVID-19 vaccine has
been headache. According to the Zoe Health Study,
the overall prevalence of headache after vaccination by
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ranged from 25 to 42% [10]. e
CDC Trusted Source page reported that approximately
one-third of people experienced severe post-vaccination
headache, regardless of the type or brand of vaccine, at
a rate of 1% after the first dose and 3% after the second
dose [11].
One study in Italy reported on the increased likeli-
hood of headache after vaccination by AstraZeneca vac-
cine, followed by the Pfizer vaccine [12]. Ekizoglu et al.
assessed the history of headache following influenza vac-
cination and during Covid-19. ey found that 30.6%
healthcare personnel had experienced headache follow-
ing Covid vaccination that was more common in females
with pre-existing primary headaches, thyroid disorders,
headache during COVID-19, or headache related to the
influenza vaccine [15]. Sekiguchi et al. in their study in
Japan performed a survey on nursing staff. eir result
demonstrated that participants with the history of head-
ache (migraineurs and non-migraineurs) will develop
more headache compare to the healthy controls [13].
However, overall information about headache follow-
ing those brands, as well as others, has been limited and
requires further evaluation. is is especially important
for individuals who have experienced COVID-19 infec-
tion prior to vaccination. is study evaluated and com-
pared the incidence of headache following inoculation
with different types of commonly used COVID-19 vac-
cines and determined the factors related to the incidence
of headache following vaccination among selected Ira-
nian healthcare workers who had previously recovered
from COVID-19.
Materials and methods
e participants in this cross-sectional study com-
prised 334 healthcare personnel who had initially recov-
ered from COVID-19 infections of different intensities.
According to our institutional protocol, these individu-
als were vaccinated at least one month after recovery
with one of the brands of COVID-19 vaccine mentioned
above between April and September 2021. e brands of
corona vaccine that were commonly used among health-
care workers in this study included AstraZeneca, Sino-
pharm (China), Sputnik V (Russia), Bharat (India) and
COVIran Barekat (Iran).
An online questionnaire designed to cover all the
necessary data. is questionnaire included the demo-
graphics characteristics, the brand of vaccine adminis-
tered, severity of initial COVID-19 infection (defined as
quarantine at home, hospitalization in an isolated ward
or ICU), concomitant clinical symptoms, PCR positivity
after vaccination, rate of analgesic use after vaccination
and COVID-19 positivity between two vaccine doses.
In addition, information related to the post-vaccination
headache, including time duration between vaccination
and headache occurrence, time to reaching peak inten-
sity after onset, pattern and location of the headache and
medication used for headache relief also were assessed.
All patients were reassured about the privacy of their
information and, after explaining the objectives of the
project, verbal consent was obtained from all. e study
endpoint was to determine the prevalence of headache
and its characteristics following the use of each vaccine
brand and then to determine the effect of vaccination
of the different brands while adjusting for gender, initial
COVID-19 severity and previous history of headache.
In this regard, the severity of the COVID-19 was deter-
mined based on the Criteria for Clinical Severity of Con-
firmed COVID-19 as released by WHO [1, 2].
For statistical analysis, results were presented as
mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the quantitative vari-
ables and were summarized by frequency (percentage)
Page 3 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
for categorical variables. Continuous variables were com-
pared using the t-test or Mann-Whitney test whenever
the data did not appear to have a normal distribution
or when the assumption of equal variance was vio-
lated across the study groups. e multivariable logistic
regression model was employed to examine the effect of
type of vaccine on post-vaccination headache as adjusted
for gender, history of headache and COVID-19 severity.
P-values of 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
e statistical software SPSS (version 23.0) for Windows
(IBM; USA) was used for statistical analysis.
Results
A total of 334 hospital staff members who had a history
of COVID-19 infection and had subsequently been vac-
cinated with different brands of vaccines in Iran were
assessed (Table1). e average age of participants was
36.62 ± 4.36year. of which 72.8% were female and 27.2%
were male. Of the vaccines used, 12.9% were vaccinated
with AstraZeneca, 16.2% with Sinopharm, 62.3% with
Sputnik V, 6.9% with Bharat and 1.8% with other brands.
e initial COVID-19 severity of the participants was
assessed and it was determined that 62.6% had quaran-
tined at home, 32.3% had been hospitalized in a general
ward and 5.1% had been admitted to an ICU.
Overall, 39.2% of participants reported experiencing
post-vaccination headache and 30.8% of participants
reported a history of headache. Of those, 51.1% charac-
terized their previous headaches as of the migraine type,
27.4% as tension type and 21.5% as other types. e mean
time between injection of the vaccine and the onset of
headache was 26.78 ± 6.93 h. Most participants (83.2%)
reported the onset of headache to be less than 24h after
vaccination. ey reported the headache reaching a peak
within about 8.62 ± 2.41 h after the onset and the over-
all duration of the headache to be 4.22 ± 1.26h. In 50% of
participants, the headache duration was less than 6h.
With respect to the symptoms accompanying the post-
vaccination headache, the most frequent was nausea
(9.2%), followed by sensitivity to noise (6.9%) and photo-
phobia (4.6%). In most patients, the headache was of the
compression type and most reported that the headache
was felt diffusely in various parts of the head. e sever-
ity of headache in most participants (93.0%) was such
that they resorted to the use of some type of analgesic
(Table2).
Figure 1 shows that the prevalence of post-vaccina-
tion headache was significantly different according to
the brand of vaccine administered. e prevalence of
post-vaccination headache was highest for AstraZen-
eca (62.8%), followed by Sputnik V (40.4%) and Bharat
(30.4%) (p < 0.001). Post-vaccine headache was found to
be significantly higher in females than in males (43.6%
versus 27.5%; p = 0.001). Table 3 reveals that, although
the onset of headache (early or delayed) did not differ
across vaccine brands, the pattern of headache did differ.
Compression headache was reported more often by those
vaccinated with AstraZeneca or Sputnik V. Pulsatile
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population (n = 334)
Gender (%) Male 91 (27.2)
Female 243 (72.8)
Type of vaccine (%) Astrazeneca 43 (12.9)
Sinopharm 54 (16.2)
Sputnik 208 (62.3)
Baharat 23 (6.9)
Others 6 (1.8)
COVID-19 severity (%) Hospitalization 108 (32.3)
ICU admission 17 (5.1)
Quarantine at home 209 (62.6)
Concomitant symptoms (%) Joint pain 59 (17.7)
Chilling 13 (3.9)
Muscular pain 72 (21.6)
Runny nose 23 (6.9)
Sleep problem 6 (1.8)
Dizziness 8 (2.4)
Neural symptoms 20 (6.0)
PCR positivity after vaccination (%) 2 (0.6)
Analgesic use after vaccination (%) 28 (8.4)
Table 2 Characteristics of headache after vaccination in study
population (n = 334)
Prevalence of post-vaccination headache (%) 131 (39.2)
Previous history of head-
ache (%)
Migraine 67 (51.1)
Tension 36 (27.4)
Other types 28 (21.5)
Mean time of occurring headache after vaccination, hour 26.78 ± 6.93
Form of headache after vac-
cination (%)
Early (≤ 24 h) 109 (83.2)
24 to 72 h) 10 (7.6)
72 h to 7 days 8 (6.1)
> 72 h 4 (3.1)
The mean duration of headache (hour) 4.22 ± 1.26
Pattern of post-vaccination
headache (%)
Pressing 97 (74.0)
Pulsatile 22 (16.8)
Neurologic type 12 (9.2)
Location of post-vaccina-
tion headache (%)
Frontal 14 (10.7)
Temporal 13 (9.9)
Occipital 4 (3.1)
Parietal 7 (5.3)
Diffuse 43 (32.8)
Neck 1 (0.7)
Mixed 49 (37.5)
Other symptoms along with
headache (%)
Nausea 21 (9.2)
Photophobia 6 (4.6)
Sensitivity to sound 9 (6.9)
Medication used for head-
ache relief (%)
Acetaminophen 65 (49.6)
Ibuprofen 17 (12.9)
Naproxen 16 (12.2)
Other analgesics 24 (18.3)
Page 4 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
headaches were reported to occur most often following
vaccination with Sinopharm.
Table4 indicates that, in multivariate logistic regres-
sion analysis, the brand of vaccine (OR = 1.328; p = 0.040),
female gender (OR = 1.934; p = 0.017) and COVID-19
severity (OR = 3.541; p = 0.001) were the main determi-
nants for prediction of post-vaccination headache. It was
noted that a history of headache before vaccination was
not significantly associated with the occurrence of post-
vaccination headache.
Discussion
Recent studies have reported on the occurrence of head-
ache after inoculation with COVID-19 vaccines; how-
ever, the present study is the first to evaluate this event in
individuals who have been vaccinated after initial infec-
tion by and recovery from COVID-19 and who experi-
enced post-vaccination headaches. It should be noted
that, post-vaccination, there were no signs of re-infection
among participants.
e predominant finding of the present study has been
that about one-third of the vaccinated individuals in the
study group reported various types of post-vaccination
headache. A review of the literature (Table5) showed that
the incidence of post-vaccination headache ranged from
19.5 to 49.4% regardless of the type of vaccine used or
the target population (general population or healthcare
workers). In a meta-analysis of these studies, we found
an overall prevalence of 31.2% (95% CI: 25.3–37.9%) for
headache, with a prevalence of 34.6% (95% CI: 27.4–
42.5%) among healthcare workers, but with considerable
heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 99.037 (Figs. 2) and
98.343 (Fig. 3), respectively; p < 0.001) [1233]. ese
divergent results could relate to the different brands of
Table 3 The quality of headache according to type of vaccines
used (n = 131)
Characteristics Astrazeneca Sinopharm Sput-
nik
Ba-
ha-
rat
P
value
Form of headache 0.984
Early 23 (85.2) 10 (83.3) 69
(82.1)
6
(85.7)
Delayed 4 (14.8) 2 916.7) 15
(17.9)
1
(14.3)
Pattern of
headache
0.046
Pressing 20 (74.1) 8 (66.7) 63
(75.0)
4
(57.1)
Pulsatile 1 (3.7) 4 (33.3) 13
(15.5)
2
(28.6)
Neuralgic type 6 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 8
(9.5)
1
(14.3)
Location of
headache
0.814
Frontal 0 (0.0) 2 (16.7) 10
(12.0)
1
(14.3)
Temporal 2 (7.4) 1 (8.3) 10
(12.0)
0
(0.0)
Occipital 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 4
(4.8)
0
(0.0)
Parietal 3 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 4
(4.8)
0
(0.0)
Diffuse 10 (37.0) 5 (41.7) 23
(27.7)
5
(71.4)
Neck 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1
(1.2)
0
(0.0)
Mixed 12 (44.4) 4 (33.3) 31
(37.3)
1
(14.3)
Fig. 1 Prevalence of post-vaccine headache according to type of vaccine used (p = 0.001)
Page 5 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
vaccine used as well as differences in the study popula-
tions. It could be concluded that about one-third of indi-
viduals who have been vaccinated against COVID-19
experienced various degrees of headache, with a slightly
higher incidence rate among healthcare personnel.
More interestingly, most headaches occurred within
the first 24 h after vaccination (83.2%) with the mean
time between vaccination and headache onset to be
26.78 ± 6.93 h. As indicated by Göbel et al. [34], the
latency between vaccination against COVID-19 and the
occurrence of headache was on average 18.0 ± 27.0 h.
More than half of their participants perceived the
headache in less than 10 h and 80% within 24 h after
vaccination, which is similar to our findings. Koji Seki-
guchi et al. [35] also reported that the median onset of
headache after the first and second vaccine doses were
10 and 12h, respectively, and mean duration of head-
ache was 4.5 and 8.0 h, respectively. In that study, the
mean time to onset of headache after vaccination was
4.22 ± 1.26h. In 50% of their participants, the headache
duration was less than 6h and in 80% was less than 22h.
Göbel et al. [34] reported a mean headache duration of
14.2 + 21.4h.
About one-third of participants reported general-
ized headache. Göbel et al. [34] reported bilateral head-
ache in 73.1% of their subjects, with the most prominent
Table 4 The effect of type of vaccine on post-vaccination headache adjusted for gender, history of headache, and COVID-19 severity
Factor B S.E. Sig. Exp(B) 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Type of vaccine 0.283 0.138 0.040 1.328 1.013 1.740
Male gender -0.660 0.277 0.017 0.517 0.301 0.889
History of headache -0.240 0.127 0.059 0.787 0.613 1.009
COVID-19 severity 1.264 0.671 0.001 3.541 1.668 5.642
Hosmer-Le meshow Goodness of Fit : Chi-Square = 9.428, p = 0.307
Table 5 Reviewing the studies on post-vaccination headache
Author, Country Type of study Number of
population
Targeted
population
Type of vaccine Preva-
lence of
headache
Serwaa, Ghana [13] Cross-sectional 654 Personnel AstraZeneca 27.3% 178
García-Azorín, Norway [14] Cross-sectional 77 General Non-replicant adenovirus vector-
based vaccines
49.4% 38
Ekizoglu, Turkey [15] Cross-sectional 1819 Personnel CoronaVac (Pfizer) 30.6% 556
Göbel, Germany [16] Cohort 12,000 General ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 19.5% 2340
Sekiguchi, Japan [17] Cross-sectional 171 Personnel Pfizer 39.7% 68
Hatmal, Jordan [18] Cross-sectional 2213 General Sinopharm, AstraZeneca,
Pfizer-BioNTech
46.9% 1038
Solomon, Ethiopia [18] Cross-sectional 672 Personnel AstraZeneca 50.2% 337
Adam, Saudi Arabia [19] Cross-sectional 330 General Pfizer, AstraZeneca 24.2% 86
Pokharel, Nepal, [20] Cross-sectional 220 Personnel Covishield 19.5% 43
Klugar, Czech Republic
[21]
Cross-sectional 599 Personnel Pfizer, AstraZeneca 53.6% 321
Saeed, UAE [22] Cross-sectional 1102 General Sinopharm 10.0% 110
Almufty, Iraq [23] Cross-sectional 1012 General Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm 34.0% 344
Quiroga, Spain [24] Cross-sectional 708 General Pfizer 34.0% 240
Cuschieri, Malta [25] Cross-sectional 1480 Personnel Pfizer 44.2% 655
Kaya, Turkey [26] Cohort 329 Personnel Pfizer 16.8%, 56
Raid, Czech Republic [27] Cross-sectional 92 Personnel AstraZeneca 29.3%, 27
Abu-Hammad, Jordan
[28]
Cross-sectional 409 Personnel Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm 42.0% 172
Lee, Seoul Korea [29] Cross-sectional 265 Personnel Pfizer 48.7% 129
Zhang, China [30] Cross-sectional 1526 Personnel Pfizer 6.0% 92
El-Shitany, Saudi Arabia
[31]
Cross-sectional 124 General Pfizer 22.5% 28
Kadali, USA [32] Cross-sectional 1245 Personnel Pfizer 45.4% 565
Kim, Seoul Korea [33] Cross-sectional 1403 Personnel Pfizer, AstraZeneca 47.4% 665
Our study, Iran Cross-sectional 334 Personnel AstraZeneca, Sinopharm Sputnik v
Bharat, Co Iran barekat
39.2% 131
Page 6 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
zones being the forehead (38.0%) followed by the temple
(32.2%). Sekiguchi et al. [35] reported the rate of bilat-
eral headache in healthy controls having no history of
headache, and history of migraine and non-migraine
headaches as being 78.8%, 62.5% and 75.9%, respectively.
e participants in the present study primarily reported
compression-type headaches. Göbel et al. [34] reported
compression headache and dull pain in 49.2% and 40.7%
of participants, respectively. Ekizoglu et al. [15] reported
throbbing headaches in 40.1% of participants and com-
pression headache in 30.4%.
Another important finding was the occurrence of post-
vaccination headache as being potentially influenced by
the factors of the female gender and severity of the ini-
tial COVID-19 infection. Research released by the CDC
on the safety of COVID-19 vaccinations indicated post-
vaccination side-effects occurred among 79.1% of women
but only in 61.2% of men [36]. As migraine and tension
headaches are more prevalent in women than in men [37,
38], such a difference may affect the likelihood of post-
vaccination headache among women compared to men.
e current study found a significant difference in the
prevalence of headache according to vaccine brand used
among different countries. As shown, the highest rate of
headache was after AstraZeneca vaccination, followed by
Sputnik V; however, the literature reviewed (Table5) did
not differentiate between vaccines in relation to post-vac-
cination headache. For example, the rate of post-vaccina-
tion headache following vaccination by Pfizer-BioNTech
ranged from 6.0 to 48.7%. Additionally, information
about the incidence of side-effects of brands such as Sin-
opharm and Sputnik V vaccines has been limited.
ere is no documented and comprehensive expla-
nation of the pathomechanisms of headache following
vaccination against COVID-19. Some believe that such
a headache may originate from the spike protein of the
virus used to produce the vaccine [39]. Others have spec-
ulated that the immune response triggered by such pro-
teins plays a significant role [40]. is means that flaring
pro-inflammatory cascades and secretion of cytokines
and prostaglandins may be responsible for vaccination-
related headache and other concurrent symptoms [41,
41]. It should be noted that the technologies and mate-
rials used for creating the vaccines could play a role in
post-vaccination headache. is should be evaluated in
further studies.
One limitation of the study was that some of the most
commonly used brands globally, such as Pfizer, were not
Fig. 3 Prevalence of post-vaccine headache among healthcare workers
in different studies
Fig. 2 Prevalence of post-vaccine headache among total population in
different studies
Page 7 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
widely available in Iran; thus was not possible to evaluate
the post-vaccination headache for these brands. Addi-
tionally, the pattern of headache among the healthcare
workers as participants was not evaluated during the first
exposure to COVID-19.
Conclusion
e current study examined the incidence of post-vac-
cination headache among healthcare workers who were
vaccinated against COVID-19 after recovering from a
previous bout of the virus. Different brands of vaccine
were examined and it was found that 39.2% of partici-
pants experienced post-vaccination headache. is inci-
dence was greater among females than males as well as
those who had experienced more severe cases of COVID-
19 before vaccination. Among the brands used in our
population, the highest rate of post-vaccination headache
was for the AstraZeneca, followed by Sputnik V. Consid-
ering that COVID-19 will continue to infect the global
population in the future, vaccination, as well as identifi-
cation and classification of post-vaccination headache,
can improve appropriate management of the virus. e
differentiation of such headaches from other post-vacci-
nation side-effects, such as cerebrovascular thrombotic
events, can be vital to the targeted management of these
events.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the healthcare workers who completed the
questionnaire carefully.
Author contributions
Somayeh Nasergivehchi contributed to the study conception and design,
acquisition of data and drafting of the manuscript. Mansoureh Togha
contributed to the study conception and design and the critical revision of
the manuscript. Elham Jafari contributed to the study conception and design,
acquisition of data and revision of the manuscript. Mehrdad Sheikhvatan
contributed to analysis and statistics of the data. Donya Shahamati
contributed to data entry and processing.
Funding
This paper was not funded.
Availability of data and materials
Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest with respect to the
research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethic approval and patient consent
All participants provided informed written consent to participate in this study.
The study protocol complied with the guidelines of the 2013 version of the
Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of
Tehran University of Medical Sciences: IR.TUMS.NI.REC.1400.054.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to publish the article.
Author details
1Department of Headache, Iranian Center of Neurological Research,
Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Neurology, Baharloo University Hospital, Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Headache, Neurology Ward, School of Medicine, Sina
University Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
6Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition
and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Behehshti University of
Medical Sciences Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Received: 29 January 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023
References
1. Ghasemiyeh P, Mohammadi-Samani S, Firouzabadi N, Dehshahri A, Vazin A. A
focused review on technologies, mechanisms, safety, and efficacy of available
COVID-19 vaccines. Int Immunopharmacol 2021 Sep 17;100:108162. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108162. Online ahead of print.
2. Khan A, Khan T, Ali S, Aftab S, Wang Y, Qiankun W, Khan M, Suleman M, Ali
S, Heng W, Ali SS, Wei DQ, Mohammad A. SARS-CoV-2 new variants: char-
acteristic features and impact on the efficacy of different vaccines. Biomed
Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;11:143:112176.
3. Scott J, Richterman A, Cevik M. COVID-19 vaccination: evidence of waning
immunity is overstated. BMJ. 2021 Sep;23:374:n2320. https://doi.org/10.1136/
bmj.n2320.
4. Gómez-Carballa A, Pardo-Seco J, Bello X, Martinón-Torres F, Salas A. Super-
spreading in the emergence of COVID-19 variants. Trends Genet. 2021 Sep
8:S0168-9525(21)00262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.003. Online ahead of
print.
5. Mehraeen E, Dadras O, Afsahi AM, Karimi A, MohsseniPour M, Mirzapour P,
Barzegary A, Behnezhad F, Habibi P, Salehi MA, Vahedi F, Heydari M, Kianzad
S, Moradmand-Badie B, Javaherian M, SeyedAlinaghi S, Sabatier JM. Vaccines
for COVID-19: A Review of Feasibility and Effectiveness. Infect Disord Drug
Targets. 2021 Sep 23. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526521666210923144
837.
6. Raman R, Patel KJ, Ranjan K. COVID-19: Unmasking Emerging SARS-CoV-2
Variants, Vaccines and Therapeutic Strategies. Biomolecules 2021 Jul
6;11(7):993. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070993.
7. Tavilani A, Abbasi E, Kian Ara F, Darini A, Asefy Z. COVID-19 vaccines: Current
evidence and considerations. Metabol Open., Iglesias A, Canton J, Ortega-
Prieto AM, Jimenez-Guardeño JM, Regla-Nava JA. An Overview of Vaccines
against SARS-CoV-2 in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Pathogens. 2021 Aug
14;10(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10081030.
9. Changjing Cai 1., Yinghui Peng 1, Edward Shen 2, Qiaoqiao Huang 1, Yihong
Chen 1, Ping Liu 1, Cao Guo 1, Ziyang Feng 1, Le Gao 1, Xiangyang Zhang 1,
Yan Gao 1, Yihan Liu 1, Ying Han 3, Shan Zeng 4, Hong Shen 5. A comprehen-
sive analysis of the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Mol Ther. 2021
Sep 1;29(9):2794–2805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.08.001.
10. Talha Khan Burki. Lifting of COVID-19 restrictions in the UK and the Delta vari-
ant. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Aug;9(8):e85.
11. Anand P, Stahel VP. Review the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a
review. Patient Saf Surg. 2021 May 1;15(1):20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13037-021-00291-9.
12. Camilla Mattiuzzi 1. Giuseppe Lippi 2. Headache after COVID-19 vaccination:
updated report from the italian Medicines Agency database. Neurol Sci. 2021
Sep;42(9):3531–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05354-4. Epub 2021
Jun 18.
13. Dorcas Serwaa 1 2, Felix Osei-Boakye. Non-life-threatening adverse reactions
from COVID-19 vaccine; a cross-sectional study with self-reported symptoms
among Ghanaian healthcare workers. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021
Sep;21:1–6. Online ahead of print. 3 4, Charles Nkansah 5, Selasie Ahiatrogah
1, Emmanuel Lamptey 1 6, Ratif Abdulai 1, Maxwell Hubert Antwi 7, Eric Yaw
Wirekoh 8, Ernest Owusu 9, Tonnies Abeku Buckman 10, Mark Danquah 11.
14. David García-Azorín 1, Andreas TPhuD, Christoph R. J Schankin 10, Henrik
Winther Schytz 5, Alexandra Sinclair 11 12, Guus G Schoonman # 13, Espen
Page 8 of 8Nasergivehchi et al. Head & Face Medicine (2023) 19:19
Saxhaug Kristoffersen # 14 15. Delayed headache after COVID-19 vaccination:
a red flag for vaccine induced cerebral venous thrombosis. J Headache Pain.
2021 Sep 17;22(1):108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01324-5.
15. Esme Ekizoglu 1., Haşim Gezegen 1, Pınar Yalınay Dikmen 2, Elif Kocasoy
Orhan 1, Mustafa Ertaş 1, Betül Baykan 1. The characteristics of COVID-19
vaccine-related headache: Clues gathered from the healthcare person-
nel in the pandemic. Cephalalgia 2021 Sep 12;3331024211042390. doi:
10.1177/03331024211042390. Online ahead of print.
16. Carl HG. 1 2, Axel Heinze 2, Sarah Karstedt 1 2, Mascha Morscheck 2, Lilian
Tashiro 2, Anna Cirkel 1 2, Qutayba Hamid 3, Rabih Halwani 3, Mohamad-Hani
Temsah 4, Malte Ziemann 5, Siegfried Görg 5, Thomas Münte 1, Hartmut
Göbel 2. Clinical characteristics of headache after vaccination against COVID-
19 (coronavirus SARS-CoV-2) with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: a multicen-
tre observational cohort study. Brain Commun. 2021 Jul 23;3(3):fcab169. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab169. eCollection 2021.
17. Koji Sekiguchi 1, Narumi Watanabe 1., Naoki Miyazaki 2, Kei Ishizuchi 1,
Chisato Iba 1, Yu Tagashira 1, Shunsuke Uno 3, Mamoru Shibata 1 4, Naoki
Hasegawa 3, Ryo Takemura 2, Jin Nakahara 1, Tsubasa Takizawa 1. Incidence
of headache after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with history of headache:
A cross-sectional study. Cephalalgia 2021 Aug 18;3331024211038654. doi:
10.1177/03331024211038654. Online ahead of print.
18. J Yoseph Solomon # 1, Tewodros Eshete # 2, Bersabeh Mekasha # 1, Wubshet
Assefa # 3. COVID-19 Vaccine: Side Effects After the First Dose of the Oxford
AstraZeneca Vaccine Among Health Professionals in Low-Income Country:
Ethiopia. Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 16;14:2577–2585. doi: https://doi.
org/10.2147/JMDH.S331140. eCollection 2021.
19. Mohamed Adam 1., Moawia Gameraddin 2, Magbool Alelyani 1, Mohammad
Y Alshahrani 3, Awadia Gareeballah 2, Irshad Ahmad 4, Abdulrahman Azzawi
5, Basem Komit 6, Alamin Musa 1. Evaluation of Post-Vaccination Symptoms
of Two Common COVID-19 Vaccines Used in Abha, Aseer Region, Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 7;15:1963–1970. doi:
https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S330689. eCollection 2021.
20. Khilasa Pokharel 1, Bishwa Raj Dawadi 2, Anup Karki 1. Side Effects after Sec-
ond Dose of Covishield Vaccine among Health Care Workers: A Descriptive
Cross Sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;59(238):577–579.
doi: https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.6556.
21. Miloslav Klugar 1 2, Abanoub Riad 1 3, Mohamed Mekhemar 4, Jonas Conrad
4, Mayte Buchbender 5, Hans-Peter Howaldt 6, Sameh Attia 6. Side Effects
of mRNA-Based and Viral Vector-Based COVID-19 Vaccines among German
Healthcare Workers. Biology (Basel). 2021 Aug 5;10(8):752. doi: https://doi.
org/10.3390/biology10080752.
22. Balsam Qubais Saeed 1., Rula Al-Shahrabi 2, Shaikha Salah Alhaj 2, Zainab
Mansour Alkokhardi 2, Ahmed Omar Adrees 2. Side effects and percep-
tions following Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccination. Int J Infect Dis 2021 Aug
9;111:219–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.013. Online ahead of print.
23. Hind B, Almufty 1, Shinah A, Mohammed M. Abdullah 3, Muayad A Merza
4. Potential adverse effects of COVID19 vaccines among Iraqi population;
a comparison between the three available vaccines in Iraq; a retrospective
cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Jul 12;15(5):102207. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102207. Online ahead of print.
24. Quiroga 1 B, Sánchez-Álvarez E 2, Goicoechea M 3, de Sequera P, 4, Spanish
Society of Nephrology Council. COVID-19 vaccination among Spanish
nephrologists: Acceptance and side effects. J Healthc Qual Res. 2021 Jun
8;S2603-6479(21)00051 – 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.05.002. Online ahead of
print.
25. Sarah Cuschieri 1, Borg M. 2, Steve Agius 3, Jorgen Souness 4, Andre Brincat
2, Victor Grech 5. Adverse reactions to Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination of health-
care workers at Malta’s state hospital. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14605.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14605. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
26. Ferit Kaya 1, Edibe Pirincci 2. Determining the frequency of serious adverse
reactions of inactive SARS-COV-2 vaccine. Work. 2021;69(3):735–9. https://doi.
org/10.3233/WOR-210473.
27. Abanoub Riad 1 2, Andrea Pokorná 2 3 4, Mohamed Mekhemar 5, Jonas Con-
rad 5, Jitka Klugarová 1 2 3 4, Michal Koščík 1 6, Miloslav Klugar 1 2 3 4, Sameh
Attia 7. Safety of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine: Independent Evidence from Two
EU States. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;9(6):673. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/
vaccines9060673.
28. Osama Abu-Hammad 1 2, Hamza Alduraidi 3, Shaden Abu-Hammad 4,
Ahmed Alnazzawi 1, Hamzah Babkair 1, Abdalla Abu-Hammad 5, Ibrahim
Nourwali 1, Farah Qasem 6, Najla Dar-Odeh 1 2. Side Effects Reported by
Jordanian Healthcare Workers Who Received COVID-19 Vaccines. Vaccines
(Basel). 2021 Jun 1;9(6):577. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060577.
29. Yun Woo Lee 1, So Yun Lim 1. Adverse Reactions of the Second Dose of the
BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers in Korea. J Korean
Med Sci. 2021 May;31(21):e153. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e153.
Ji Hyang Lee 2, Joon Seo Lim 3, Miseo Kim 4, Seonhee Kwon 4, Jiyeon Joo 4,
Sun Hee Kwak 4, Eun Ok Kim 4, Jiwon Jung 1 4, Hyouk Soo Kwon 2, Tae Bum
Kim 2, Sung Han Kim 1 4, Seongman Bae 5.
30. Mei-Xian Zhang 1 2, Zhang T-T. 3, Gui-Feng Shi 3, Feng-Min Cheng 4, Yan-
Ming Zheng 3, Tao-Hsin Tung 2, Hai-Xiao Chen 5. Safety of an inactivated
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among healthcare workers in China. Expert Rev Vaccines.
2021 Jul;20(7):891–898. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1925112. Epub 2021 May
13.
31. Nagla A, El-Shitany S, Harakeh M, Badr-Eldin M. Bagher 1, Basma Eid 1, Haifa
Almukadi 1, Badrah S Alghamdi 6, Ahlam A Alahmadi 7, Nibal A Hassan 8,
Nariman Sindi 9, Samar A Alghamdi 10, Hailah M Almohaimeed 11, Zuhair M
Mohammedsaleh 12, Turki M Al-Shaikh 13, Mohammed S Almuhayawi 14,
Soad S Ali 15, Manal El-Hamamsy 16 17. Minor to Moderate Side Effects of
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Among Saudi Residents: A Retrospective
Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Gen Med. 2021 Apr 19;14:1389–1401. doi: https://
doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S310497. eCollection 2021.
32. Renuka AK, Kadali 1 RJ. 2, Sharanya Peruru 3, Srikrishna V Malayala 4. Side
effects of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: A randomized, cross-sectional
study with detailed self-reported symptoms from healthcare workers.
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:376–381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijid.2021.04.047. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
33. Si Ho Kim # 1, Wi YM. # 2, Su Yeon Yun 1, Jeong Seon Ryu 1, Jung Min Shin 1,
Eun Hui Lee 1, Kyung Hwa Seo 1, Sung Hee Lee 1, Kyong Ran Peck 3. Adverse
Events in Healthcare Workers after the First Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or
BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: a Single Center Experience. J Korean
Med Sci. 2021 Apr 12;36(14):e107. doi: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.
e107.
34. Göbel CH, Heinze A, Karstedt S, Morscheck M, Tashiro L, Cirkel A, Hamid
Q, Halwani R, Temsah MH, Ziemann M, Görg S, Münte T, Göbel H. Clinical
characteristics of headache after vaccination against COVID-19 (coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2) with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: a multicentre observational
cohort study. Brain Commun. 2021 Jul 23;3(3):fcab169.
35. Koji Sekiguchi 1, Narumi Watanabe 1., Naoki Miyazaki 2, Kei Ishizuchi 1,
Chisato Iba 1, Yu Tagashira 1, Shunsuke Uno 3, Mamoru Shibata 1 4, Naoki
Hasegawa 3, Ryo Takemura 2, Jin Nakahara 1, Tsubasa Takizawa 1. Incidence
of headache after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with history of headache:
A cross-sectional study. Cephalalgia. 2021 Aug 18;3331024211038654.doi:
10.1177/03331024211038654. Online ahead of print.
36. CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in: Cent. Dis. Control Prev; 2020.
37. Hassan M, Ullah Khan N, Iqbal Chaudhary M, Jan Z, Majid Rajput H, Susan
Dewey R, Badshah M. Neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2: a
single-center case series. Brain Hemorrhages 2021 Sep 16. doi: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.hest.2021.09.004. Online ahead of print.
38. Mouliou DS, Kotsiou OS, Gourgoulianis KI. Estimates of COVID-19 Risk Fac-
tors among Social Strata and Predictors for a Vulnerability to the Infection.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8701. doi: https://doi.
org/10.3390/ijerph18168701.
39. Alnefaie A, Albogami S. Current approaches used in treating COVID-19 from
a molecular mechanisms and immune response perspective. Saudi Pharm J.
2020;28(11):1333–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
40. Schlickeiser S, Schwarz T, Steiner S, et al. Disease severity, fever, age, and sex
correlate with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses. Front Immunol.
2020;11:628971. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
41. Steiner S, Sotzny F, Bauer S, et al. HCoV- and SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive T cells
in CVID patients. Front Immunol. 2020;11:607918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar].
42. Orsucci D, Ienco EC, Nocita G, Napolitano A, Vista M. Neurological features of
COVID-19 and their treatment: a review. Drugs Context. 2020;9:5. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
... In the current study, the highest prevalence of post-vaccination headache occurred after Astra vaccines (100%), while the lowest occurred after Sinopharm and Johnson vaccines (10%) (p < 0.001). Other studies also support these findings, with AstraZeneca consistently associated with a higher risk of post-vaccination headache compared to other vaccines (7,8) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Headache is the most frequent neurological adverse event following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We investigated the frequency, characteristics, and factors associated with post-vaccination headaches, including their occurrence and prolongation (≥ 48 h). Methods In this observational cross-sectional cohort study, retrospective data collected between April 2021–March 2022 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the effect of clinicodemographic factors on the odds of post-vaccination headache occurrence and prolongation. Results Of 2,500 people who were randomly sent the questionnaire, 1822 (mean age: 34.49 ± 11.09, female: 71.5%) were included. Headache prevalence following the first (V1), second (V2), and third (V3) dose was 36.5, 23.3, and 21.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Post-vaccination headaches were mainly tension-type (46.5%), followed by migraine-like (36.1%). Headaches were mainly bilateral (69.7%), pressing (54.3%), moderate (51.0%), and analgesic-responsive (63.0%). They mainly initiated 10 h [4.0, 24.0] after vaccination and lasted 24 h [4.0, 48.0]. After adjusting for age and sex, primary headaches (V1: aOR: 1.32 [95%CI: 1.08, 1.62], V2: 1.64 [1.15, 2.35]), post-COVID-19 headaches (V2: 2.02 [1.26, 3.31], V3: 2.83 [1.17, 7.47]), headaches following the previous dose (V1 for V2: 30.52 [19.29, 50.15], V1 for V3: 3.78 [1.80, 7.96], V2 for V3: 12.41 [4.73, 35.88]), vector vaccines (V1: 3.88 [3.07, 4.92], V2: 2.44 [1.70, 3.52], V3: 4.34 [1.78, 12.29]), and post-vaccination fever (V1: 4.72 [3.79, 5.90], V2: 6.85 [4.68, 10.10], V3: 9.74 [4.56, 22.10]) increased the odds of post-vaccination headaches. Furthermore, while primary headaches (V1: 0.63 [0.44, 0.90]) and post-COVID-19 headaches (V1: 0.01 [0.00, 0.05]) reduced the odds of prolonged post-vaccination headaches, psychiatric disorders (V1: 2.58 [1.05, 6.45]), headaches lasting ≥48 h following the previous dose (V1 for V2: 3.10 [1.08, 10.31]), and migraine-like headaches at the same dose (V3: 5.39 [1.15, 32.47]) increased this odds. Conclusion Patients with primary headaches, post-COVID-19 headaches, or headaches following the previous dose, as well as vector-vaccine receivers and those with post-vaccination fever, were at increased risk of post-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination headaches. Primary headaches and post-COVID-19 headaches reduced the odds of prolonged post-vaccination headaches. However, longer-lasting headaches following the previous dose, migraine-like headaches at the same dose, and psychiatric disorders increased this odd.
Article
Full-text available
Health-care professionals in Ghana were among the prioritized high-risk groups to be administered with the initial supply of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine procured by the Government of Ghana. This study sought to assess and identify the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine short-term side effects among health-care workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 654 Ghanaian healthcare workers between 16th March and 5th May 2021. The study included health-care workers in registered health settings, who had been vaccinated against COVID-19 and consented to participate in the survey. Descriptive statistics, binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were executed using SPSS version 22 at p < .05. The findings revealed that, 528 (80.7%) of the participants experienced adverse reactions, which lasted between 0 and 2 days among, 347 (53.1%) of the study participants. The most reported adverse reactions were general body weakness, 434 (32.0%), headache 371 (27.3%), and fever, 257 (19.1%). Health workers aged 35–39 and 40–44 years had lower odds of adverse reactions compared with those aged 25–29 years (aOR: 0.34, 95% C.I. 0.186,0.621, p < .001) and (aOR: 0.42, 95% C.I. 0.201,0.890, p = .023). Taking analgesics before vaccination decreased the likelihood of adverse reactions (aOR: 0.28, 95% C.I. 0.185,0.427, p < .001). High prevalence of adverse reactions was found among the healthcare workers, however short-lived. The most reported systemic adverse reactions were general body weakness, headache, and fever. We recommend intensification of campaigns on COVID-19 vaccines and their associated adverse effects to avoid the negative implication on uptake among the healthcare workers and the general population.
Article
Full-text available
Background Headache is a frequent symptom following COVID-19 immunization with a typical onset within days post-vaccination. Cases of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) have been reported in adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccine recipients. Findings We reviewed all vaccine related CVT published cases by April 30, 2021. We assessed demographic, clinical variables and the interval between the vaccination and onset of headache. We assessed whether the presence of headache was associated with higher probability of death or intracranial hemorrhage. We identified 77 cases of CVT after COVID-19 vaccination. Patients’ age was below 60 years in 74/77 (95.8%) cases and 61/68 (89.7%) were women. Headache was described in 38/77 (49.4%) cases, and in 35/38 (92.1%) was associated with other symptoms. Multiple organ thrombosis was reported in 19/77 (24.7%) cases, intracranial hemorrhage in 33/77 (42.9%) cases and 19/77 (24.7%) patients died. The median time between vaccination and CVT-related headache onset was 8 (interquartile range 7.0–9.7) days. The presence of headache was associated with a higher odd of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 7.4; 95% CI: 2.7–20.8, p < 0.001), but not with death (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.18–1.47, p = 0.213). Conclusion Delayed onset of headache following an adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccine is associated with development of CVT. Patients with new-onset headache, 1 week after vaccination with an adenovirus vector-based vaccine, should receive a thorough clinical evaluation and CVT must be ruled out.
Article
Full-text available
The neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 are wide-ranging from simple headache to severe demyelinating brain disease. This is a review of collected case reports of patients with SARS-CoV-2 with neurological manifestations presenting to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS). Neurological manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 such as encephalitis, acute cerebrovascular disease, encephalitis with chorea, post-COVID myositis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) are of great concern but are often overlooked in the presence of life-threatening abnormal vital signs in severely ill SARS-CoV-2 patients. There is a need to diagnose these manifestations at the earliest opportunity to limit long-term consequences and complications. Much research is needed to explore the role of SARS-CoV-2 in causing these neurological manifestations by isolating it either from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or the brain tissue of the deceased on autopsy. We also recommend exploring the risk factors that lead to the development of these neurological manifestations.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The Oxford-AstraZeneca is one of COVID-19 vaccine which is expected to be mass-produced and plays a critical role in controlling the pandemic that the globe faced. Ethiopia launched the AstraZeneca vaccination and planned to vaccinate 20% of the population by the end of 2021. Health care professionals are one of the eligible groups of the community to receive the vaccine with priority. Although individuals are advised to take the vaccine to protect themselves and the people around them from COVID-19 infection, many are doubtful about the consequences of the vaccine. So, this study assessed the immediate symptoms associated with taking the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: This online study was conducted from April 15 to 30, 2021 at a national level across health care providers who took their first dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine in Ethiopia. Results: There were 672 study participants engaged in this study and around 75.8% of health care providers who took the vaccine had injection site symptoms like pain (65.48%) and tenderness (57.89%). Most of them (60%) developed their injection site symptom within 12 hours after vaccination and the symptoms lasted for about 24-72 hours on most (63.53%) of the participants. Mild symptoms were identified among 70.98% of the study participants; tiredness and headache were the most reported symptoms with 52.08% and 50.15%, respectively. Only 6.1% of participants reported severe symptoms. Conclusion: As like that of other vaccines, the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine has some adverse effects and most side effects peaked within the first 24 hours following vaccination and usually lasted 1-3 days. Severe symptoms were uncommon, but they were found to be a major reason why vaccine recipients did not recommend it to others and did not plan to take their second dose. After receiving the COVID-19 vaccination, recipients should be advised about potential vaccine symptoms, how to handle them, and when and where to seek additional guidance if necessary.
Article
Full-text available
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its new variants reported in different countries have posed a serious threat to human health and social fabrics worldwide. In addition, these new variants hindered the efforts of vaccines and other therapeutic developments. In this review article, we explained the emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2, their transmission risk, mortality rate, and, more importantly, the impact of each new variant on the efficacy of the developed vaccines. The reports concluded that the emergence of a variant that entirely evades the immune response triggered by the vaccine is improbable. The emergence of new variants and reports of re-infections are creating a more distressing situation and therefore demands further investigation to formulate an effective therapeutic strategy.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 Nov-19) COVID-19 vaccines have shown promising safety and acceptability. However, COVID-19 vaccine side effects play an essential role in public vaccine confidence. We aimed to study the side effects of these COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: A randomized, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between March and May of 2021. In total, 330 participants among the King Khalid University community in the Aseer region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia reported their side effects following the COVID-19 vaccine. A questionnaire was designed and validated to collect the participants’ demographic data and COVID-19-related symptoms after COVID-19 vaccine injection. Results: Symptoms associated with COVID-19 were reported by 226 participants (68.5%). The most common side effects reported by the participants were fever (n = 136, 41.2%), fatigue (n = 119, 36.1%), headache (n = 86, 24.2%), malaise (n = 121, 36.7%), myalgia (n = 121, 36.7%), and muscle and joint pain (n = 76, 23%). Of the participants, 5.1% became infected with COVID-19 after vaccination. Symptoms were significantly more common in males than in females (p = 0.006). Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 vaccination side effects in the Aseer region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was consistent with the manufacturers’ data. The most common post-vaccination symptoms reported by the participants were fever, myalgia, malaise, fatigue, muscle and joint pain, and headache. The results of this study showed significant variation in adverse events between Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. Healthcare providers and recipients of vaccines can be more confident about the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines.
Article
Introduction Many potential vaccines for COVID-19 are being studied, and several studies have reported the results of these vaccines. We aimed to review the current evidence of the feasibility and effectiveness of Vaccines for COVID-19. Methods A search was carried out utilizing the keywords in the online databases, including Scopus,Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. We included both human and non-human studies because of the vaccine novelty, which could limit our ability to include sufficient human studies. Results The review of studies showed that several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are under development; different platforms are being used, including eight vaccines are adenovirus-based vectors, six vaccines are RNA-based formulations, one vaccine is DNA-based formulations, and other vaccines are using other platforms, including lipid nano particles. Conclusion It is crucial to gather as much clinically relevant evidence as possible regarding the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety profiles of these vaccines and adhere wisely to CDC protocols and guidelines of vaccine production.
Article
More than 20 months has been passed since the detection of the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection named COVID-19 from Wuhan city of China. This novel coronavirus spread rapidly around the world and became a pandemic. Although different therapeutic options have been considered and approved for the management of COVID-19 infection in different stages of the disease, challenges in pharmacotherapy especially in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 and with underlying diseases have still remained. Prevention of infection through public vaccination would be the only efficient strategy to control the morbidity and mortality caused by COVID-19. To date, several COVID-19 vaccines using different platforms including nucleic acid-based vaccines, adenovirus-based vaccines, protein-based vaccines, and inactivated vaccines have been introduced among which many have received approval for prevention against COVID-19. In this comprehensive review, available COVID-19 vaccines have been discussed. The mechanisms, safety, efficacy, dosage, dosing intervals, possible adverse reactions, storage, and coverage of these four different vaccine platforms against SARS-CoV-2 variants have been discussed in detail and summarized in tabular format for ease of comparison and conclusion. Although each COVID-19 vaccine has various advantages and disadvantages over the others, accessibility and affordability of approved vaccines by the official health organizations, especially in developing countries, would be essential to terminate this pandemic. The main limitation of this study was the lack of access to the clinical data on available COVID-19 vaccines developed in Eastern countries since the data on their efficacy, safety, and adverse reactions were limited.
Article
Superspreading and Variants of Concern (VOC) of the human pathogen, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are the main catalyzers of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Measuring their individual impact is however challenging. By examining the largest database of SARS-CoV-2 genomes The Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID; n > 1.2M high quality sequences), we present evidence suggesting that superspreading has played a key role in the epidemiological predominance of VOC. There are clear signatures in the database compatible with large superspreading events coinciding chronologically with the worst epidemiological scenarios triggered by VOC. The data suggest that, without the randomness effect of the genetic drift facilitated by superspreading, new VOC of SARS-CoV-2 would have had more limited chance of success.