... However, the effect of opiate antagonists has also been analyzed in apparently concurrent learning tasks, showing that their administration in neonatal animals blocks the acquisition of olfactory preferences induced by the simultaneous intraoral administration of nutritive substances (Shide & Blass, 1991) or electric shocks (Roth & Sullivan, 2003). In this line, opiate antagonists induce aversion for the place with which they are associated in place conditioning tasks (Mucha, Millan, & Herz, 1985;Shoblock & Maidment, 2006;Stolerman, 1985) and block place preferences induced by morphine (Manzanedo, Serrano, Aguilar, Rodríguez-Arias, & Miñarro, 2001;Mucha, van der Kooy, O'Shaughnessy, & Bucenieks, 1982); cocaine (Mitchem et al., 1999); ethanol (Nizhnikov, Pautassi, Truxell, & Spear, 2009a;Nizhnikov, Varlinskaya, & Spear, 2009b); locomotor activity (Lett, Grant, & Koh, 2001); food (sucrose; Ågmo et al., 1995); and concurrent rewarding intracranial electrical stimulation of the external lateral parabrachial nucleus (Simón, García, & Puerto, 2011;Simón, García, Zafra, Molina, & Puerto, 2007) or insular cortex (García, Simón, & Puerto, 2013;García, Zafra, & Puerto, 2015), brain regions with abundant opiate receptors (Atweh & Kuhar, 1977;Chamberlin, Mansour, Watson, & Saper, 1999;Ding, Kaneko, Nomura, & Mizuno, 1996;Izenwasser, Staley, Cohn, & Mash, 1999;Mansour, Khachaturian, Lewis, Akil, & Watson, 1988;Sales, Riche, Roques, & Denavit-Saubie, 1985;Skoubis, Matthes, Walwyn, Kieffer, & Maidment, 2001;Svingos, Cheng, Clarke, & Pickel, 1995). Moreover, in transgenic animals lacking receptors, opiate antagonists do not induce aversion (Skoubis et al., 2001) and morphine does not induce preference (Matthes et al., 1996) for associated places. ...