... Moreover, due to the variation of materials and composting technologies, it can't be available one single method to appreciate the compost stability and maturity (Benito et al., 2003;Chang & Chen, 2010). Thus, several methods and tests were proposed to evaluate these two compost quality properties (Epstein, 1997;Aslam et al., 2008;Azim et al., 2018): empirical methods, such as appearance, color, smell, granulometry, texture, temperature (Jimenez & Garcia, 1989); physical techniques, such as self-incineration after moisturizing (Brinton et al., 1995), respirometric methods (Barrena Gomez et al., 2005;Tremier et al., 2005;Scaglia & Adani, 2008) and sieving tests; physical and chemical analyses, such as moisture, KCl pH (Avnimelech et al., 1996), C/N ratio (Jimenez & Garcia, 1989) and the NO 3 − /NH 4 + ratio, humification index (humic acids/fulvic acids ratio) (Veeken et al., 2000;Jouraiphy et al., 2005;Huang et al., 2006), water-soluble carbon concentration, dissolved organic carbon ; colorimetric and spectroscopic methods (UV-Visible, Fluorescence), FTIR -Fourier transform infrared, NMR -Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) (Lim & Wu, 2015); biological studies on plant growing (Said-Pullicino et al., 2007;Cesaro et al., 2019). There are also several phytotoxicity tests used for the estimation of compost maturity as follows: germination tests (including root assessments) (Zucconi et al., 1985), growth tests (assessment of top-growth and sometimes root mass), germination and growth combinations, and other methods such as enzyme activities (Herrmann & Shann, 1993). ...