ChapterPDF Available

NIV in type 2 (hypercapnic) acute respiratory failure

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) refers to providing ventilatory support without the use of invasive artificial airway. The use of NIV has markedly increased recently and is currently regarded essential in the management of acute respiratory failure and in particular acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). AHRF could complicate many respiratory disorders including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, neuromuscular and chest wall diseases, including morbid obesity, kyphoscoliosis and obesity hypoventilation syndrome. The use of NIV in such conditions helps to prevent further deterioration and avert the need for IMV, and by this cuts down on hospital stay, costs and prevents IMV related complications. This chapter discusses the use of NIV in AHRF, review its indications/ contraindications and predictors of success or failure with special emphasis on obese patients with AHRF.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Chapter 32. NIV in type 2 (hypercapnic) acute respiratory failure
Shaden O. Qasrawi, MBBS, MRCP, Ahmed S. BaHammam, MD, FACP
University Sleep Disorders Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and
the Strategic Technologies Program of the National Plan for Sciences and Technology and Innovation in
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
PROF. AHMED S. BAHAMMAM
Professor of Medicine
Director, Sleep Disorders Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University
Box 225503, Riyadh 11324, Saudi Arabia
Telephone: 966-1-467-1521
Fax: 966-1-467-2558
E-mail: ashammam2@gmail.com
ashammam@ksu.edu.sa
2
Abbreviations
ABG Arterial Blood Gas
AECOPD Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
AHRF Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
BPAP Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure
bpm Breath per minuteCF Cystic Fibrosis
COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
CPAP Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
ECG Electrocardiogram
EPAP Expiratory Positive AirwayPressure
HDU High Dependency Unit
ICU Intensive Care Unit
IMV Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
IPAP Inspiratory Positive AirwayPressure
FFM Full Face Mask
NMD Neuro Muscular Diseases
NIV Non-Invasive Ventilation
OHS Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome
OSA Obstructive Sleep Apnea
PaCO2 Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
PE Pulmonary Embolism
RCT Randomized Controlled Trials
VtPS Volume targeted pressure support
3
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) refers to providing ventilatory support without the use of invasive
artificial airway. The use of NIV has markedly increased recently and is currently
regarded essential in the management of acute respiratory failure and in
particular acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF).
AHRF could complicate many respiratory disorders including chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, neuromuscular and chest wall diseases,
including morbid obesity, kyphoscoliosis and obesity hypoventilation syndrome. The use of NIV
in such conditions helps to prevent further deterioration and avert the need for IMV, and by
this cuts down on hospital stay, costs and prevents IMV related complications. This chapter
discusses the use of NIV in AHRF, review its indications/ contraindications and predictors of
success or failure with special emphasis on obese patients with AHRF.
4
Introduction
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) refers to providing ventilatory support using a mask or a similar
device without the use of invasive artificial airway (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy tube).
The use of NIV has markedly increased in the recent years, and is currently considered to be
essential in the management of acute respiratory failure and in particular acute hypercapnic
respiratory failure (AHRF) (1, 2).
AHRF results from inadequate alveolar ventilation, which is needed to maintain normal arterial
oxygen and carbon dioxide levels (3). Conventionally, pH <7.35 and arterial partial pressure of
carbon dioxide (PaCO2) >6.5 kPa (>50mmHg) define acute respiratory acidemia and AHRF (3). In
general, if AHRF persists despite initial medical therapy, those values have been used as a
threshold for considering commencing NIV (3). AHRF could complicate many respiratory
disorders including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, cystic fibrosis,
bronchiectasis, neuromuscular and chest wall diseases, including morbid obesity and
kyphoscoliosis (see Table 1) (3). This section aims to discuss AHRF in obese patients. However,
as obese patients may develop AHRF secondary to several respiratory disorders, we will cover
briefly the utility of NIV in different respiratory disorders that cause AHRF, and then will focus
on AHRF in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS).
Indications and contra-indications to NIV in AHRF
The indications for NIV are variable based on the underlying cause, its severity and the
associated comorbidities. Clinical manifestations that support the early use of NIV include,
moderate to severe dyspnea, tachypnea (>24 breaths per min in obstructive lung diseases, >30
per min in restrictive lung diseases) and signs suggestive of increased work of breathing
including accessory muscle use and thoraco-abdominal paradox (4). Other indications are
usually based on investigations showing impaired gas exchange reflecting acute or acute on
chronic ventilatory failure with raised PaCO2 and acidemia (5, 6).Table 2 summarizes the
indications and contraindication to NIV. Application of NIV could be difficult in patients with
severe facial deformity, fixed upper airway obstruction or facial burns (4). There is a number of
5
other potential contraindications; however, most of those have been employed as exclusion
criteria in clinical trials rather than being proven to be associated with worse outcome (3, 7).
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD)
Acute exacerbations of COPD accounts for a significant number of annual admissions worldwide
(8). Of these, many present with hypercapnia (9), which increases the risk of mortality (10, 11).
Developing AHRF in COPD is usually multifactorial with many underlying causes such as
infection, mucosal edema, bronchospasm, sputum retention, sedation, pneumothorax,
pulmonary embolism, left ventricular failure and excessive oxygen therapy. There is now strong
evidence showing that uncontrolled oxygen therapy increases acidemia and subsequently
mortality in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) (10). This oxygen-induced hypercapnia
applies with variable degree, to other causes of AHRF (3). Hence, in managing all patients at a
risk for AHRF, controlled oxygen therapy with oxygen saturation target of 88-92% is
recommended initially (3).
The use of NIV in AECOPD has increased markedly and its use is currently viewed as a part of
the standard therapy for patients who have persistent respiratory acidemia despite receiving
standard medical therapy (12, 13). The use of NIV in AECOPD has reduced the need for IMV,
thereby reducing complications and cutting hospital costs associated with IMV, in addition to
improving survival (13). Hence NIV is currently considered as a major progress in the
management of acute exacerbations of AECOPD (13).
Severe acidemia alone is not a contraindication for NIV trial in an appropriately equipped
setting where shifting the patient to IMV can be rapidly achieved. Nevertheless, the use of NIV
should not delay commencing IMV when needed (3).The treating team should keep in mind
other possible causes of AHRF that may coexist with COPD such as obstructive sleep apnea
(OSA) and OHS (3, 14). Obese patients with COPD may have coexisting sleep disordered
breathing, which is called overlap syndrome. For patients with overlap syndrome, NIV should
aim to correct both hypoventilation and upper airway obstruction.
6
An improvement in physiological parameters such as pH and respiratory rate within 1-2 hr of
initiating treatment is usually a predictor of success of NIV, whereas worsening of those
parameters is predictive of failure of NIV with increased risk for intubation or mortality (3).
Table 3 shows the predictors of NIV success in patients with COPD exacerbation and AHRF (3,
15-20).
Monitoring of PaCO2 NIV serves as a useful guide in planning the withdrawal of NIV and
transcutaneous PaCO2 measurement serves as a convenient alternative to arterial or capillary
sampling (3).
Acute exacerbation of asthma
Patients with acute attack of asthma present usually with hypoxemic respiratory failure.
However, in advanced cases, patients may present with AHRF. Nevertheless, the use of NIV in
acute exacerbation of asthma remains a controversial topic, and reports of NIV use in patients
with severe acute asthma are limited. A few RCTs have explored the utility of NIV in hypoxemic
respiratory failure in patients with acute exacerbation of asthma (21). However, the existing
evidence is equivocal and limited by a small number of published trials with methodological
problems (21). Moreover, at present there is no strong evidence to support NIV use in
asthmatics with AHRF. The two studies reporting clear beneficial effect of NIV use in AHRF
asthma were retrospective studies with methodological limitations (22, 23). One of them,
included population who seem more likely a COPD than asthmatic population (24). At present,
there is limited evidence to recommend the use of NIV in patients with asthma exacerbation
and respiratory failure. Larger, prospective RCTs of properly selected patients and a good
methodological design are needed.
Non-CF bronchiectasis
Patients who suffer from non-CF bronchiectasis can present with recurrent episodes of
hypercapnic respiratory failure (3). Despite little data, there is no evidence that patients with
non-CF bronchiectasis presenting with AHRF do worse on NIV compared to those commenced
7
on IMV (25). Therefore, NIV is indicated in the presence of respiratory acidemia using the same
criteria applicable in AECOPD (3). It is not unusual to find sleep disordered breathing in obese
patients with bronchiectasis (26). Such patients should be managed with NIV to improve
ventilation and eliminate the obstructive events during sleep.
Although managing and clearing excessive sputum while on NIV can be challenging, NIV could
actually assist by improving dyspnea and hence help patients to participate more effectively in
physiotherapy (27).
Extra-pulmonary restrictive lung diseases
Severe chest wall deformity and neuromuscular diseases (NMD) can markedly impair the
respiratory muscles function, and hence result in a restrictive lung function pattern
characterized by reduced vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity and functional residual
capacity, which in turn can lead to AHRF (28). Such patients will usually present with chronic
hypercapnia and acute respiratory failure that is commonly precipitated by infection (28). The
risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure increases when the VC falls below 11.5 L (29). Obese
patients with neuromuscular diseases are at an increased risk for sleep disordered breathing
and those with bulbar dysfunction are at a higher risk for OSA (30).There are no available RCTs
comparing NIV with IMV in the management of AHRF complicating extra-pulmonary restrictive
lung diseases, and the current recommendations are extended from the evidence available for
AECOPD management (3, 28). Generally, NIV should be tried in patients presenting with
hypercapnia without waiting for the development of acidemia, but if NIV fails, intubation
should not be delayed unless IMV is not desired for whatever valid reason. In patients with
NMD with bulbar dysfunction and communication difficulties, NIV is usually difficult. Moreover,
patients with bulbar dysfunction have an increased risk of aspiration. In general, patients with
NMD and chest wall deformities need an overnight sleep study once stable, and might require
nocturnal NIV at home (3).
Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS)
8
Hypercapnia in hospitalized obese patients is associated with an increase in morbidity and
mortality (31). OHS is generally underdiagnosed and undertreated (32). It is also not uncommon
for chronic hypercapnia to be discovered when obese patients who are otherwise not known to
have OHS, are assessed for emergency or elective operations. However, patients with OHS
commonly present with acute on top of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (33). A recent
study has shown that approximately 40% of patients with OHS present for the first time with
AHRF (34). Additionally, OHS patients admitted with AHRF have a high rate of in-hospital
mortality (18%) (35). Therefore, it is important to keep in mind the possibility of OHS as a cause
of AHRF in the morbidly obese patients.
OHS is the second most frequent indication (after COPD) for NIV treatment among hospitalized
patients with AHRF (36, 37). It is recommended to initiate NIV in all patients suspected of
having AHRF secondary to OHS, before performing sleep study, since early initiation of NIV may
obviate the need for IMV (2). Nevertheless, there is no enough evidence to provide a guidance
for the use of NIV in the treatment of both chronic hypercapnia and AHRF in obese patients (2).
The majority of patients with OHS have coexisting severe OSA (38). In general, NIV will be
needed as an emergency treatment in all patients with OHS presenting with AHRF (2). In
addition, NIV can be considered in admitted patients with raised PaCO2 and excessive daytime
sleepiness, sleep disordered breathing and/or right heart failure even when acidemia is absent
(39).
Pressure- and volume-limited ventilation have been reported in patients with AHRF; however,
we recommend initiating treatment with bi-level PAP (BPAP) ventilation as there is no evidence
indicating that other ventilatory modes are superior to BPAP (2). During NIV therapy,
observation and monitoring of the level of consciousness, vital signs, respiratory pattern,
oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gases are crucial (2, 40). As most patients with OHS have
coexisting OSA, EPAP should be increased gradually until snoring, witnessed apneas, and dips in
oxygen saturation are eliminated. IPAP should be gradually increased to ensure optimal
ventilation until an acceptable level of steady-state oxygen saturation (≥ 90%) is attained (33).
Figure 1 shows a proposed algorithm for the NIV management of OHS patients with AHRF (2).
9
In patients who do not respond to BPAP mode, volume targeted pressure support (VtPS) can be
attempted (41). VtPS is a hybrid mode that combines the advantages of pressure-limited and
volume-limited modes of ventilation into one ventilation mode. Studies concerning the use of
volume targeted pressure support mode to treat OHS patients did not show clinical benefits
over those achieved with a fixed bi-level mode (41). Moreover, VtPS mode has not directly been
assessed in OHS during AHRF.
Limited studies have assessed the predictors of NIV failure in OHS patients with acute
respiratory failure. Lemyze et al. demonstrated in a prospective study (n=76), that severe
pneumonia and multiple organ failure predict early NIV failure in morbidly obese patients with
acute respiratory failure (42). The same study reported that more than half of the patients
experienced a delayed response to NIV, with persistence of hypercapnic acidemia during the
first 6 hours (42).
Once the patient is stable, it is recommended to perform a sleep study for patients with OHS to
choose the right ventilatory mode and pressure needed to eliminate the obstructive respiratory
events and hypoventilation. All patients with OHS will eventually need NIV use at home. Studies
that followed OHS patients with AHRF after discharge indicated higher mortality in patients
who refused PAP therapy (33, 40). Several studies have reported that good compliance with
domiciliary NIV results in improvement in gas exchange, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and
number of hospitalizations in patients with OHS (43).
Conclusion
Obesity represents a global epidemic, and obese patients are at a higher risk for developing
AHRF. Practitioners should recognize that morbidly obese patients with sleep hypoventilation,
daytime hypercapnia, and pulmonary hypertension have an increased risk of AHRF. NIV is
currently an accepted therapeutic strategy in several disorders that can be complicated by
respiratory failure and in particular AHRF. The use of NIV in obese patients with AHRF helps to
prevent further deterioration and avert the need for IMV. When NIV is implemented, clear
treatment goals should be defined and a plan of care should document escalation measures in
10
the event of failure of NIV. Although NIV is considered now as a great progress in managing
respiratory failure it should not delay intubation and IMV in those patients who fail to respond
to NIV or in whom NIV is not indicated.
11
References
1. Rabec C, Emeriaud G, Amadeo A, Fauroux B, Georges M. New modes in non-invasive ventilation.
Paediatr Respir Rev. [Review]. 2016 Mar;18:73-84.
2. Bahammam AS, Al-Jawder SE. Managing acute respiratory decompensation in the morbidly
obese. Respirology. 2012 Jul;17(5):759-71.
3. Davidson AC, Banham S, Elliott M, Kennedy D, Gelder C, Glossop A, et al. BTS/ICS guideline for
the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults. Thorax. 2016 Apr;71
Suppl 2:ii1-ii35.
4. Garpestad E, Brennan J, Hill NS. Noninvasive ventilation for critical care. Chest. [Research
Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review]. 2007 Aug;132(2):711-20.
5. Nava S, Hill N. Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet. [Review]. 2009 Jul
18;374(9685):250-9.
6. Rose L. Management of critically ill patients receiving noninvasive and invasive mechanical
ventilation in the emergency department. Open access emergency medicine : OAEM. [Review].
2012;4:5-15.
7. Ram FS, Picot J, Lightowler J, Wedzicha JA. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for
treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
Cochrane database of systematic reviews. [Review]. 2004(1):CD004104.
8. Qureshi H, Sharafkhaneh A, Hanania NA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations:
latest evidence and clinical implications. Therapeutic advances in chronic disease. [Review]. 2014
Sep;5(5):212-27.
9. Roberts CM, Stone RA, Buckingham RJ, Pursey NA, Lowe D. Acidosis, non-invasive ventilation
and mortality in hospitalised COPD exacerbations. Thorax. [Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2011 Jan;66(1):43-8.
10. Plant PK, Owen JL, Elliott MW. One year period prevalence study of respiratory acidosis in acute
exacerbations of COPD: implications for the provision of non-invasive ventilation and oxygen
administration. Thorax. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2000 Jul;55(7):550-4.
11. Soriano JB, Lamprecht B, Ramirez AS, Martinez-Camblor P, Kaiser B, Alfageme I, et al. Mortality
prediction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comparing the GOLD 2007 and 2011 staging
systems: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. [Research Support, Non-U.S.
Gov't]. 2015 Jun;3(6):443-50.
12. Kaul S, Pearson M, Coutts I, Lowe D, Roberts M. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the clinical
management of acute COPD in 233 UK hospitals: results from the RCP/BTS 2003 National COPD Audit.
Copd. 2009 Jun;6(3):171-6.
13. Ram FS, Picot J, Lightowler J, Wedzicha JA. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for
treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
Cochrane database of systematic reviews. [Meta-Analysis
Review]. 2004(3):CD004104.
14. Early use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Chinese medical journal.
[Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2005 Dec 20;118(24):2034-40.
12
15. Confalonieri M, Garuti G, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF, Antonelli M, Conti G, et al. A chart of failure
risk for noninvasive ventilation in patients with COPD exacerbation. The European respiratory journal.
2005 Feb;25(2):348-55.
16. Phua J, Kong K, Lee KH, Shen L, Lim TK. Noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic acute respiratory
failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease vs. other conditions: effectiveness and predictors
of failure. Intensive care medicine. [Comparative Study]. 2005 Apr;31(4):533-9.
17. Budweiser S, Jorres RA, Pfeifer M. Treatment of respiratory failure in COPD. International journal
of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [Review]. 2008;3(4):605-18.
18. Price LC, Lowe D, Hosker HS, Anstey K, Pearson MG, Roberts CM. UK National COPD Audit 2003:
Impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute
COPD exacerbation. Thorax. [Multicenter Study]. 2006 Oct;61(10):837-42.
19. Keenan SP, Mehta S. Noninvasive ventilation for patients presenting with acute respiratory
failure: the randomized controlled trials. Respiratory care. [Review]. 2009 Jan;54(1):116-26.
20. Ucgun I, Metintas M, Moral H, Alatas F, Yildirim H, Erginel S. Predictors of hospital outcome and
intubation in COPD patients admitted to the respiratory ICU for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Respiratory medicine. 2006 Jan;100(1):66-74.
21. Carson KV, Usmani ZA, Smith BJ. Noninvasive ventilation in acute severe asthma: current
evidence and future perspectives. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. [Review]. 2014
Jan;20(1):118-23.
22. Meduri GU, Cook TR, Turner RE, Cohen M, Leeper KV. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
in status asthmaticus. Chest. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 1996 Sep;110(3):767-74.
23. Ganesh A, Shenoy S, Doshi V, Rishi M, Molnar J. Use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients
with acute asthma exacerbation. Am J Ther. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6):431-4.
24. Bahloul M, Chtara K, Gargouri R, Majdoub A, Chaari A, Bouaziz M. Failure of noninvasive
ventilation in adult patients with acute asthma exacerbation. J Thorac Dis. 2016 May;8(5):744-7.
25. Phua J, Ang YL, See KC, Mukhopadhyay A, Santiago EA, Dela Pena EG, et al. Noninvasive and
invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure associated with bronchiectasis. Intensive care medicine.
2010 Apr;36(4):638-47.
26. Santamaria F, Esposito M, Montella S, Cantone E, Mollica C, De Stefano S, et al. Sleep disordered
breathing and airway disease in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Respirology. 2014 May;19(4):570-5.
27. Pasteur MC, Bilton D, Hill AT. British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis.
Thorax. [Practice Guideline
Review]. 2010 Jul;65 Suppl 1:i1-58.
28. Ambrosino N, Carpene N, Gherardi M. Chronic respiratory care for neuromuscular diseases in
adults. The European respiratory journal. [Review]. 2009 Aug;34(2):444-51.
29. Branthwaite MA. Cardiorespiratory consequences of unfused idiopathic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest.
1986 Oct;80(4):360-9.
30. Aboussouan LS. Sleep-disordered Breathing in Neuromuscular Disease. American journal of
respiratory and critical care medicine. [Review]. 2015 May 1;191(9):979-89.
31. Nowbar S, Burkart KM, Gonzales R, Fedorowicz A, Gozansky WS, Gaudio JC, et al. Obesity-
associated hypoventilation in hospitalized patients: prevalence, effects, and outcome. The American
journal of medicine. [Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2004 Jan 1;116(1):1-7.
32. Carrillo A, Ferrer M, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Lopez-Martinez A, Llamas N, Alcazar M, et al. Noninvasive
ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure caused by obesity hypoventilation syndrome and
13
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[Comparative Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2012 Dec 15;186(12):1279-85.
33. BaHammam A, Syed S, Al-Mughairy A. Sleep-related breathing disorders in obese patients
presenting with acute respiratory failure. Respiratory medicine. 2005 Jun;99(6):718-25.
34. BaHammam AS, Pandi-Perumal SR, Piper A, Bahammam SA, Almeneessier AS, Olaish AH, et al.
Gender differences in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome. J Sleep Res. 2016 Mar 18.
35. Marik PE, Desai H. Characteristics of patients with the "malignant obesity hypoventilation
syndrome" admitted to an ICU. J Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):124-30.
36. Confalonieri M, Gorini M, Ambrosino N, Mollica C, Corrado A. Respiratory intensive care units in
Italy: a national census and prospective cohort study. Thorax. 2001 May;56(5):373-8.
37. Ciledag A, Kaya A, Akdogan BB, Kabalak PA, Onen ZP, Sen E, et al. [Early use of noninvasive
mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in a respiratory ward: a
prospective study]. Arch Bronconeumol. [Clinical Trial]. 2010 Oct;46(10):538-42.
38. Al Dabal L, Bahammam AS. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Ann Thorac Med. 2009
Apr;4(2):41-9.
39. Davidson C, Banham S, Elliott M, Kennedy D, Gelder C, Glossop A, et al. British Thoracic
Society/Intensive Care Society Guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic
respiratory failure in adults. BMJ open respiratory research. 2016;3(1):e000133.
40. Perez de Llano LA, Golpe R, Ortiz Piquer M, Veres Racamonde A, Vazquez Caruncho M, Caballero
Muinelos O, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in
patients with obesity-hypoventilation syndrome. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):587-94.
41. Pluym M, Kabir AW, Gohar A. The use of volume-assured pressure support noninvasive
ventilation in acute and chronic respiratory failure: a practical guide and literature review. Hosp Pract
(1995). [Review]. 2015;43(5):299-307.
42. Lemyze M, Taufour P, Duhamel A, Temime J, Nigeon O, Vangrunderbeeck N, et al. Determinants
of noninvasive ventilation success or failure in morbidly obese patients in acute respiratory failure. PloS
one. [Observational Study]. 2014;9(5):e97563.
43. Piper AJ, Grunstein RR. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: mechanisms and management.
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):292-8.
14
Table 1: Causes of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Causes of hypercapnic respiratory failure
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Acute severe asthma
Bronchiectasis
Cystic Fibrosis
Obstructive sleep apnea
Kyphoscoliosis
Morbid obesity
Opioid and sedative drugs
Neuromuscular diseases (e.g. cervical cord lesions, GuillainBarré syndrome,
myasthenia gravis, Muscular dystrophy)
15
Table 2: Indications and contraindications for NIV
Indications and contraindications for NIV
INDICATIONS
Clinical manifestations
Moderate to severe dyspnea
Tachypnea (>24 bpm in obstructive, >30 bpm in restrictive)
Signs of increased work of breathing (e.g. accessory muscles use and abdominal
paradox)
Gas exchange
Acute or acute on chronic ventilatory failure ( PaCO2 >6.5, kPa, pH<7.35 )
Hypoxemia
CONTRAINDICATIONS*
Respiratory or cardiac arrest
Inability to fit the mask (e.g. severe facial deformity or facial burns)
Fixed upper airway obstruction
Hypotensive shock
Uncontrolled upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Agitation /confusion
Inability to protect the upper airway
Swallowing impairment
Excessive secretions not managed by secretion clearance techniques
Multiple (i.e. two or more) organ failure
Recent upper airway or upper gastrointestinal surgery
* Some are relative contraindications
16
Table 3: Predictors for NIV success/failure in patients with COPD exacerbation and AHRF.
Predictors for NIV success/failure in AHRF in COPD
Predictors for treatment success
pH 7.25-7.35, PaCO2 > 6.5 kpa
GCS > 14
Respiratory rate 24-30/ min
Response to NIV within 1-2h
APACHE II < 29
Predictors for treatment Failure
pH <7.25
GCS ≤ 11
Respiratory rate >30/ min
Additional Pneumonia
Severe Mask leakage
Patient-ventilator asynchrony
Agitation or intolerance
Inability to clear secretions
APACHE II >29
17
Figure legends:
Figure 1: A proposed algorithm for the NIV management of OHS patients with AHRF.
18
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The British Thoracic Society (BTS) published the guideline ‘The use of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure’ in 2002.1 This was in response to trials that had demonstrated that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was an alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in life-threatening respiratory acidosis due to acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). It drew attention to evidence that, when NIV was used in the less severely unwell patient, it also limited progression to more severe respiratory failure.2 The trial also demonstrated the feasibility, of delivering NIV on general medical or admission wards that had enhanced support and when staff were provided with ongoing training. In subsequent years, NIV has been shown to deliver better rather than equivalent outcomes to invasive ventilation in AECOPD and better evidence has accumulated for the use of NIV in non-COPD disease in the intervening years. Repeated national audits have, however, raised concerns that expected patient benefit is not being delivered and have pointed to a number of process deficiencies.3–5 There is also the risk, in the absence of justifying trial evidence, that the preferred use of NIV in AECOPD might be extended to all hypercapnic patients, irrespective of circumstance or underlying disease process. That this is a real risk might be inferred from the BTS audits where the indication for NIV was not COPD in over 30% of cases.3 ,4 NIV development in the UK has been largely outside the organisational ‘umbrella’ of critical care. This may have adversely affected resource allocation and contributed to a lack of integration in NIV and IMV patient pathways. Other unintended consequences might be a restriction on access to invasive ventilation and delay in the development of extended applications of NIV, such as accelerating extubation and its use in the management of …
Article
Full-text available
The role of gender and menopause in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is well known; however, no study has reported the impact of gender on the clinical presentation and the nocturnal respiratory events in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). Therefore, we prospectively evaluated differences in the clinical characteristics of women and men with OHS in a large cohort of patients with OSA. During the study period, a total of 1,973 patients were referred to the sleep clinic with clinical suspicion of OSA. All patients underwent overnight polysomnography, during which time spirometry, arterial blood samples and thyroid tests were routinely obtained. Among 1,973 consecutive patients, 1,693 (617 women) were diagnosed with OSA, among whom 144 suffered from OHS (96 women). The prevalence of OHS among women and men was 15.6% and 4.5%, respectively (p<0.001). Women with OHS were significantly older than men with OHS (61.5±11.9yr vs. 49.1±12.5 yr, p<0.001). Although there were no significant differences between genders regarding symptoms, body mass index, spirometric data, or daytime PaCO2, women with OHS suffered significantly more from hypertension, diabetes and hypothyroidism. The prevalence of OHS was higher in postmenopausal (21%) compared to premenopausal (5.3%) women (p<0001). HCO3 and duration of SpO2 <90% were the only independent predictors of OHS. In conclusion, we report that among subjects referred to the sleep disorders clinic for evaluation of OSA, OHS is more prevalent in women than men and that women with OHS suffer from significantly more comorbidities. Postmenopausal women with OSA have the highest prevalence of OHS.
Article
Full-text available
Patients requiring noninvasive and invasive ventilation frequently present to emergency departments, and may remain for prolonged periods due to constrained critical care services. Emergency clinicians often do not receive the same education on management of mechanical ventilation or have similar exposure to these patients as do their critical care colleagues. The aim of this review was to synthesize the evidence on management of patients requiring noninvasive and invasive ventilation in the emergency department including indications, clinical applications, monitoring priorities, and potential complications. Noninvasive ventilation is recommended for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Less evidence supports its use in asthma and other causes of acute respiratory failure. Use of noninvasive ventilation in the prehospital setting is relatively new, and some evidence suggests benefit. Monitoring priorities for noninvasive ventilation include response to treatment, respiratory and hemodynamic stability, noninvasive ventilation tolerance, detection of noninvasive ventilation failure, and identification of air leaks around the interface. Application of injurious ventilation increases patient morbidity and mortality. Lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volumes based on determination of predicted body weight and control of plateau pressure has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and some evidence exists to suggest this strategy should be used in patients without lung injury. Monitoring of the invasively ventilated patient should focus on assessing response to mechanical ventilation and other interventions, and avoiding complications, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. Several key aspects of management of noninvasive and invasively ventilated patients are discussed, with a particular emphasis on initiation and ongoing monitoring priorities focused on maintaining patient safety and improving patient outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and results in an economic and social burden that is both substantial and increasing. The natural history of COPD is punctuated by exacerbations which have major short- and long-term implications on the patient and healthcare system. Evidence-based guidelines stipulate that early detection and prompt treatment of exacerbations are essential to ensure optimal outcomes and to reduce the burden of COPD. Several factors can identify populations at risk of exacerbations. Implementing prevention measures in patients at risk is a major goal in the management of COPD.
Article
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is an important tool in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Traditionally, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) have been the most commonly utilized modes for these purposes. Newer hybrid modes of NPPV, such as average volume-assured pressure support (VAPS), combine the properties of both volume- and pressure-controlled NPPV and represent another tool in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Evidence demonstrating the superiority of VAPS over BPAP is sparse, but there have been studies that have demonstrated comparable efficacy between the two modes. The use of VAPS in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure has shown better clearance of CO2 compared to BPAP, due to its property of delivering a more assured tidal volume. This, however, did not lead to a decrease in hospital-days or improved mortality, relative to BPAP. The studies evaluating VAPS for chronic respiratory failure involve small sample sizes but have shown some promise. The benefits noted with VAPS, however, did not translate into increased survival, decreased hospitalizations or improved quality of life compared to BPAP. The limited evidence available suggests that VAPS is equally effective in treating acute and chronic respiratory failure compared to BPAP. Overall, the evidence to suggest superiority of one mode over the other is lacking. There is a need for larger studies before firm conclusions can be made.
Article
There is no universal consensus on the best staging system for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although documents (eg, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] 2007) have traditionally used forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) for staging, clinical parameters have been added to some guidelines (eg, GOLD 2011) to improve patient management. As part of the COPD Cohorts Collaborative International Assessment (3CIA) initiative, we aimed to investigate how individual patients were categorised by GOLD 2007 and 2011, and compare the prognostic accuracy of the staging documents for mortality. We searched reports published from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2014. Using data from cohorts that agreed to participate and had a minimum amount of information needed for GOLD 2007 and 2011, we did a patient-based pooled analysis of existing data. With use of raw data, we recalculated all participant assignments to GOLD 2007 I-IV classes, and GOLD 2011 A-D stages. We used survival analysis, C statistics, and non-parametric regression to model time-to-death data and compare GOLD 2007 and GOLD 2011 staging systems to predict mortality. We collected individual data for 15 632 patients from 22 COPD cohorts from seven countries, totalling 70 184 person-years. Mean age of the patients was 63·9 years (SD 10·1); 10 751 (69%) were men. Based on FEV1 alone (GOLD 2007), 2424 (16%) patients had mild (I), 7142 (46%) moderate (II), 4346 (28%) severe (III), and 1670 (11%) very severe (IV) disease. We compared staging with the GOLD 2007 document with that of the new GOLD 2011 system in 14 660 patients: 5548 (38%) were grade A, 2733 (19%) were grade B, 1835 (13%) were grade C, and 4544 (31%) were grade D. GOLD 2011 shifted the overall COPD severity distribution to more severe categories. There were nearly three times more COPD patients in stage D than in former stage IV (p<0·05). The predictive capacity for survival up to 10 years was significant for both systems (p<0·01) but area under the curves were only 0·623 (GOLD 2007) and 0·634 (GOLD 2011), and GOLD 2007 and 2011 did not differ significantly. We identified the percent predicted FEV1 thresholds of 85%, 55% and 35% as better to stage COPD severity for mortality, which are similar to the ones used previously. Neither GOLD COPD classification schemes have sufficient discriminatory power to be used clinically for risk classification at the individual level to predict total mortality for 3 years of follow-up and onwards. Increasing intensity of treatment of patients with COPD due to their GOLD 2011 reclassification is not known to improve health outcomes. Evidence-based thresholds should be searched when exploring the prognostic ability of current and new COPD multicomponent indices. None. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Article
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been found to be beneficial for respiratory failure in many disease states; however, limited data are available supporting its use in acute asthma exacerbation. A retrospective chart analysis of adult patients admitted for acute asthma exacerbation and treated with NIV between January 2007 and December 2009 at a tertiary care community hospital was done. Ninety-eight patient encounters were identified. Mean age of the patients was 48.3 years, and 46% were male. Nineteen patients failed NIV and required invasive ventilation. There was no significant difference in the mean age, sex, race, and initial blood gas between patients with successful versus failed NIV. Usage of drugs, smoking, and history of past hospital or intensive care unit admission or intubation did not significantly influence the rate of failure of NIV. Patients who needed higher initial FiO2 were more likely to get intubated during their hospital stay (46.2 vs. 20.4%, P = 0.019). Patients who failed NIV were found to have longer duration of hospital stay (6.8 vs. 3.9 days, P= 0.016) and longer intensive care unit stay (4 vs. 0.9 days, P = 0.002). Use of inhalers and other medications was not found to significantly influence the rate of failure of NIV. NIV can be used initially in patients with acute asthma exacerbation, as it is associated with shorter duration of hospital stay and can prevent the morbidity of mechanical intubation. Patients with initial requirement of higher FiO2 were more likely to fail NIV and should be carefully monitored.