No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Phase II Trial of Hepatic Artery Infusional and Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients With Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Evaluate conversion rate of patients with unresectable colorectal-liver metastasis to complete resection with hepatic-arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy including bevacizumab (Bev).
Forty-nine patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were included in a single-institution phase II trial. Conversion to resection was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and response rates. Multivariate and landmark analyses were performed to evaluate survival differences between resected and nonresected patients.
Median number of tumors was 14 and 65% were previously treated patients. A high biliary toxicity rate was found in the first 24 patients whose treatment included Bev. The remaining 25 patients were treated without Bev. Overall response rates were 76% (4 complete responses). Twenty-three patients (47%) achieved conversion to resection at a median of 6 months from treatment initiation. Median OS and progression-free survival for all patients were 38 (95% confidence interval: 28 to not reached) and 13 months (95% confidence interval: 7-16). Bev administration did not impact outcome. Conversion was the only factor associated with prolonged OS and progression-free survival in multivariate analysis. On landmark analysis, patients who had undergone resection had longer OS than those who did not undergo resection (3-year OS: 80% vs 26%). Currently, 10 of 49 (20%) patients have no evidence of disease (NED) at a median follow-up of 39 months (32-65 months).
In patients with extensive unresectable CRLM, the majority of whom were previously treated, 47% were able to undergo complete resection after combined HAI and systemic therapy. Conversion to resection is associated with prolonged survival.
... [18] HAIC combined with systemic chemotherapy can better control local tumor progression, with response rates at 76%-92% and conversion resection rates up to 47%. [19,20] However, in clinical practice, how to predict efficacy before treatment or at an early stage has become an important issue with HAIC treatment. Tumor efficacy evaluation commonly uses RECIST criteria, which often require a treatment period of 3-6 months for accurate assessment. ...
... HAIC is often used as second-or third-line treatment for patients with advanced CRC liver metastases, who may be in worse health and have a worse prognosis, and this period may be too long for them. Moreover, HAIC treatment is accompanied by embolization therapy, and the post- treatment lesions often do not show significant changes in tumor size, but show significant decrease in density or calcification within the tumor, [20] which further increases the difficulty of evaluating the efficacy by RECIST criteria. Additionally, abdominal CT has limitations as the most used clinical tool for the detection and evaluation of the efficacy of liver metastases. ...
Objective
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an effective treatment for advanced unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). This study was conducted to predict the efficacy of HAIC in patients with unresectable CRLM by radiomics methods based on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) examinations and clinical data.
Materials and Methods
A total of 63 patients were included in this study (41 in the training group and 22 in the validation group). All these patients underwent CT examination before HAIC. During the follow-up period, CT scans and laboratory examinations were performed regularly. Eighty-five radiological features were extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) of CT images using the PyRadiomics program. The t -test and correlation were applied to select features. These features were analyzed using LASSO-Cox regression, and a linear model was developed to predict overall survival (OS).
Results
After reducing features by t -test and correlation test, seven features remained. After LASSO-Cox cross-validation, four features remained at λ = 0.232. They were gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray level run length matrix (GLRLM), neighborhood gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and the location of the primary tumor. The C-index was 0.758 in the training group and 0.743 in the test group. Nomograms predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival were established.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that a radiomics approach based on pretreatment CT texture analysis has the ability to predict early the outcome of HAIC in patients with advanced unresectable colorectal cancer with a high degree of accuracy and feasibility.
... D'Angelica et al. combined HAI-FUDR with best SCT based on prior patients' chemotherapy history in patients with unresectable CRLM. [35] In 76% a tumor response was accomplished and most importantly in 47% a conversion to resectable disease with prolonged survival was possible. Also, the combination HAI-FUDR with Bevacizumab was investigated, but showed an increased biliary toxicity, so the authors advised against this combination therapy. ...
Background
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAI) has been proposed as a valuable adjunct for multimodal therapy of primary and secondary liver malignancies. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence of HAI, taking into account tumor response and long-term oncologic outcome.
Summary
In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), HAI in combination with systemic therapy leads to high response rates (85–90%) and conversion to resectablity in primary unresectable disease in up to 50%. HAI in combination with systemic therapy in CRLM in the adjuvant setting shows promising long-term outcomes with up to 50% 10-year survival in a large, non-randomized single-center cohort. For hepatocellular carcinoma patients, response rates as high as 20–40% have been reported for HAI and long-term outcomes compare well to other therapies. Similarly, survival for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 3 years after treatment with HAI is reported as high as 34%, which compares well to trials of systemic therapy where 3-year survival is usually below 5%. However, evidence is mainly limited by highly selected, heterogenous patient groups, and outdated chemotherapy regimens. The largest body of evidence stems from small, often non-randomized cohorts, predominantly from highly specialized single centers.
Key Message
In well-selected patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, HAI might improve response rates and, possibly, long-term survival. Results of ongoing randomized trials will show whether a wider adoption of HAI is justified, particularly to increase rates of resectability in advanced malignant diseases confined to the liver.
... Compared to the previously reported conversion percentage after systemic chemotherapy of 15%, the results look quite encouraging. The phase II study by D'Angelica et al. [16] highlights the conversion after HAI FUDR/Dex combined with two IV regimens: oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab; and irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin, and bevacizumab. The results demonstrate 47% of conversions of primary unresectable liver metastases, as well as good survival rates after surgery: ORR 76%, median PFS, and median OS -13 and 38 months, respectively, for the all-patients group (vs. the historical data on the primary-metastatic CRC and systemic PCT: 30%-45% survival rate depending on the number of the lines; the median survival of 17.4-19.5 ...
Colorectal cancer exerts a very high level of liver metastases, even on primary diagnosis, with 80%—90% unresectable nodules. At the same time, the possibility of resection has a significant impact on survival: 5-year survival is 6%—10% without liver surgery and up to 30% upon resection of liver metastases. Finding ways to improve resectability is a topical search for doctors all over the world. One of the promising methods to convert unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer into resectable ones is a hepatic artery infusion, or intra-arterial chemotherapy allowing for the delivery of cytotoxic drugs directly to the common hepatic artery via catheter or pump with decreased systemic toxicity and increased local drug concentration. In this article, we discuss the literature data on the impact of intra-arterial chemotherapy on the resectability of colorectal metastases in the liver and present the results of the successful clinical case. The literature shows a positive impact of the hepatic artery infusion on the resectability of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. The National Cancer Institute (Ukraine) has its own experience in hepatic artery infusion with further resection of primary-unresectable colorectal metastases in the liver. In our clinical case, a patient with liver-limited metastasis of colorectal cancer was initially inoperable due to the size of tumor lesions and an insufficient residual volume of the liver. Hepatic artery infusion tactics was chosen for this patient. The patient received six cycles of intra-arterial chemotherapy, namely five FOLFOX cycles and one 5-FU cycle, and then met the resectability criteria. Also, it is important to notice that the case demonstrates chemoresistance overcoming, since the patient had disease progression before, following systemically administered XELOX, and the period until readmission of the drugs was less than 6 months. So, hepatic artery infusion can be considered a promising method to convert unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer into resectable ones for highly selected patients.
... 103 Two other trials using modern systemic chemotherapy in combination with HAI demonstrated similar results. 104,105 Further RCT are required to confirm such improvements. Luckily, the Phase III PUMP (NTR7493), and PACHA-01 (NCT02494973) trials are assessing the role of HAI as an adjuvant therapy to surgical resection in CRC-LM patients. ...
Interventional radiology techniques provide excellent local tumor control for small tumors in various organs, but several limitations can hamper the oncological outcomes such as the tumor size or the number of lesions. Technical improvements, optimal patient selection and combination with systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been successfully developed to overcome these barriers.
In this setting, chemotherapy and targeted therapies aim to diminish the tumor burden in addition to local treatments, while immunotherapies may have a synergistic effect in terms of mechanism of action on the tumor cell as well as the immune environment, with multiple treatment combinations being available. Finally, Interventional Radiology treatments often increase tumor antigen exposure to the immune system and thus stimulate a specific antitumor immune response that can act beyond the treated site. Notwithstanding their many benefits, combination treatment may also result in complications, the most feared may be auto-immune related adverse events.
In early studies, several combined therapies have shown promising levels of safety and efficacy, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma.
This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of results of combined therapies for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Recent advances and future perspectives will be discussed.
... Almost 20% of the patients with CRC harbor hepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis [3], whereas around 50% of the CRC patients develop metastasis of the liver during the clinical course of the disease [3,4]. A large proportion (approximately 75-90%) of metastatic CRC patients present with unresectable liver disease which normally reports a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 6-10% [5][6][7][8]. Thus, in such patients, tumors of the liver can be downsized and/ or converted to resectable colorectal liver metastasis Open Access *Correspondence: caoguang1207@bjmu.edu.cn; ...
Background
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy delivers the drug directly to the liver. We aim to explore the benefits and tolerability of Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib in advanced colorectal liver metastasis refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy.
Methods
This study analyzed 47 patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib after standard systemic oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab or cetuximab between Jan 2017 and Jun 2020. Regorafenib was given for only 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle.
Results
Among 47 patients, 32 (68%) were males. The median age was 61 (29–75). With a median follow-up of 22.2 months (3.7–50.7 months). Before Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy administration in combination with regorafenib, 34 (72.3%) patients previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and 37 (78.7%)patients previously received targeted biological treatment (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or both). The initial doses of regorafenib were 40 mg/d (n = 1, 2.13%), 80 mg/d (n = 11, 23.43%), 120 mg/d (n = 2, 4.26%), and 160 mg/d (n = 23, 48.94%), while for 24.6% (n = 14) dose was unknown. Median Overall Survival was 22.2 months. Median Progression-Free Survival was 10.8 (95% CI: 9.0–13.7) months. Common Adverse Events were hand-foot skin reaction (12.77%), fatigue (6.38%), vomiting (6.38%), and decreased appetite (6.38%). Only 2 patients discontinued regorafenib due to Adverse Events.
Conclusions
Regorafenib combined with Hepatic arterial infusion was effective and tolerable in patients with liver predominant metastasis of colorectal cancer. Hence, this therapy can be considered as an alternative for second- or subsequent lines of therapy in patients refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy.
... HAI has a high rate of procedure-related complications (22%) including arterial thrombosis, extrahepatic perfusion, incomplete hepatic perfusion, and hemorrhage. Liver toxicity (elevated liver enzymes, cholestasis, biliary sepsis) also can be severe and defer patients from proceeding to surgery ( Table 5 ) [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100] . In particular the use of floxuridine is associated with biliary sclerosis and concurrent dexamethasone infusion is recommended [84] . ...
Background: Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS).
Data sources: This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS.
Results: Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS.
Conclusions: With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Background
The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, efficacy and feasibility of transradial approach (TRA) for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods
A total of 100 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who received hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in the department of hepatobiliary surgery, Longyan Second Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to the arterial puncture approach: TRA group (n = 35) and transfemoral approach group (TFA) (n = 65). The operation time, radiation dose, success rate of puncture and operation, intraoperative and postoperative complications of the two groups were observed and recorded.
Results
All patients received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. The success rate of TFA group was higher than that of TRA group (100% vs 85.7%, P = 0.002). In terms of operation time and radiation dose to patients, the TRA group was higher than the TFA group (P < 0.001). In terms of postoperative complications, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The comfort and satisfaction of the TRA group were significantly higher than those of the TFA group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Transradial approach is safe, effective and feasible for hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The comfort and satisfaction of patients are significantly improved, but the technique is difficult.
Simple Summary
Colorectal cancer is a common cancer diagnosis, with many patients suffering from metastatic disease. Unfortunately, the prognosis for these patients remains grim, but there is a cohort in whom surgery remains a viable option, with the potential for a cure. The management of this cohort of patients is complex and requires the guidance of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon. There also remains a deep interplay between perioperative and operative decisions, which ultimately need tailoring to each individual patient. In this review, we aim to define these key perioperative and operative considerations in the contemporary management of colorectal liver metastasis.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20–30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Objective
To comparatively evaluate drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for efficacy, safety, and related prognostic factors in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).
Materials and Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with CRLM-administered DEB-TACE (n = 36) or cTACE (n = 39) between January 2016 and December 2017. Local control, survival outcome, and complications were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.
Results
The median follow-up in the two groups was 10.5 months (range, 0.5–22). Median PFS and OS in the DEB-TACE group were 10.0 and 13.0 months, respectively, and 6.0 and 8.5 months in the cTACE group, respectively ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.008). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS rates in the DEB-TACE group were 100.0%, 94.4%, and 55.6%, respectively, and 92.3%, 71.8%, and 35.9% in the cTACE group, respectively. The 3-month OS rate ( P = 0.083) showed no significant difference between the two groups, but significant differences were found in the 6- and 12-month OS rates ( P = 0.008 and P = 0.030). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number were independent prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS.
Conclusion
DEB-TACE has advantages over cTACE in prolonging PFS and OS in patients with CRLM. Treatment method, tumor number, and tumor size are important prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS. However, further multicenter and prospective trials are needed to confirm a deeper comparison between DEB-TACE and cTACE in patients with CRLM.
Objective
Unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remains a challenging obstacle that often prevents curative treatment. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as a local adjuvant therapy for systemic chemotherapy for patients with unresectable CRLM. HIFU is a noninvasive method previously demonstrated as efficacious for various solid malignancies.
Methods
Propensity score matching was used for the combination therapy group (HIFU group, n = 59) and the observation group receiving systemic therapy only (No‐HIFU group, n = 59). In addition, the survival benefit, adverse effects, and factors affecting prognosis following HIFU were evaluated.
Results
The disease control rate was 77.9% and 62.7%, and the objective remission rate was 18.9% and 6.8% in the HIFU and non‐HIFU groups, respectively. The survival analysis showed that median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 12.0 months and 11.0 months for the HIFU and non‐HIFU groups, respectively ( p = 0.002). The univariate and multivariate analysis showed that pre‐treatment colorectal cancer liver metastasis lesion size was significantly associated with mPFS. In addition, patients that received a combination treatment for CRLM lesions <5.0 cm had a longer mPFS when compared to those receiving systemic therapy alone (13.0 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.001). In the HIFU group, patients with lesions <5.0 cm had a longer mPFS than patients with lesions ≥5.0 cm (13.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.04) (Figure 3B,C). Most treatment‐related adverse events observed in both groups were grade 1–2. Only four cases (6.8%) of grade 1–2 skin burns were observed in patients in the HIFU group; no other statistically significant adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
Our study showed that HIFU ablation targeting unresectable CRLM alongside systemic therapy safely and significantly improved local control rates and prolonged mPFS, especially for lesions smaller than 5.0 cm.
Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) delivers localized high-dose floxuridine directly to liver tumors through an implanted pump. While patients are undergoing active treatment, the pump is refilled with chemotherapy alternating with saline every 2 weeks using a specialized noncoring needle. Numerous clinical scenarios influence the dosing of floxuridine, which do not conform to the usual dose modification schema for systemic chemotherapy. This article aims to provide practical clinical management solutions to overcome the common challenges faced by oncologists in the real-world management of HAI pump therapy.
An increasing number of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) programs have been established worldwide. Practice patterns for this complex therapy across these programs have not been reported. This survey aimed to identify current practice patterns in HAI therapy with the long-term goal of defining best practices and performing prospective studies.
Using SurveyMonkeyTM, a 28-question survey assessing current practices in HAI was developed by 12 HAI Consortium Research Network (HCRN) surgical oncologists. Content analysis was used to code textual responses, and the frequency of categories was calculated. Scores for rank-order questions were generated by calculating average ranking for each answer choice.
Thirty-six (72%) HCRN members responded to the survey. The most common intended initial indications for HAI at new programs were unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM; 100%) and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uIHC; 56%). Practice patterns evolved such that uCRLM (94%) and adjuvant therapy for CRLM (adjCRLM; 72%) have become the most common current indications for HAI at established centers. Referral patterns for pump placement differed between uCRLM and uIHC, with most patients referred while receiving second- and first-line therapy, respectively, with physicians preferring to evaluate patients for HAI while receiving first-line therapy for CRLM. Concern for extrahepatic disease was ranked as the most important factor when considering a patient for HAI.
Indication and patient selection factors for HAI therapy are relatively uniform across most HCRN centers. The increasing use of adjuvant HAI therapy and overall consistency of practice patterns among HCRN centers provides a robust environment for prospective data collection and randomized clinical trials.
Purpose:
Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have been the best responders to hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) therapy. The current treatment paradigm has drifted away from HAI in the first-line setting. We aimed to analyze outcomes of combined first-line systemic therapy with HAI therapy (HAI+SYS) in the modern era.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable CRLM who received HAI+SYS between 2003 and 2019. Patients were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes included radiological response rate, conversion to resection (CTR) rate, and overall survival (OS).
Results:
Fifty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients were identified out of 546 patients with unresectable CRLM managed with HAI. After induction treatment, 4 patients (7%) had a complete radiological response, including two durable responses. In total, 32 patients (55%) underwent CTR. CTR or complete response without resection was achieved after seven cycles of systemic therapy and four cycles of HAI therapy. Median OS for the whole cohort was 53.0 months (95% confidence interval 23.0-82.9). Three- and 5-year OS in patients who achieved CTR or complete response versus patients who did not was 88% and 72% versus 27% and 0% respectively. Of patients who underwent CTR, complete and major pathological response (no and <10% viable tumor cells, respectively) was observed in 7 (22%) and 12 patients (38%).
Conclusions:
Combined HAI+SYS in chemotherapy-naive patients resulted in durable and substantial response in a large proportion of patients. Nearly two-thirds of patients achieved a complete response or proceeded to conversion surgery, which was associated with prolonged survival.
Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Despite remarkable recent progress in developing anti-cancer agents, outcomes of patients with solid tumors remain unsatisfactory. In general, anti-cancer drugs are systemically administered through peripheral veins and delivered throughout the body. The major problem with systemic chemotherapy is insufficient uptake of intravenous (IV) drugs by targeted tumor tissue. Although dose escalation and treatment intensification have been attempted in order to increase regional concentrations of anti-tumor drugs, these approaches have produced only marginal benefits in terms of patient outcomes, while often damaging healthy organs. To overcome this problem, local administration of anti-cancer agents can yield markedly higher drug concentrations in tumor tissue with less systemic toxicity. This strategy is most commonly used for liver and brain tumors, as well as pleural or peritoneal malignancies. Although the concept is theoretically reasonable, survival benefits are still limited. This review summarizes clinical results and problems and discusses future directions of regional cancer therapy with local administration of chemotherapeutants.
Patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases are commonly treated with systemic chemotherapy to convert their disease to an operable state. Unfortunately, many patients remain unresectable after first-line chemotherapy and resort to second- and third-line regimens with poor results. Liver-directed strategies have historically been used in this setting. There has been a renewed interest in offering hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to improve resectability or palliate disease. Prospective studies over the past 2 decades have produced encouraging data, even in chemorefractory patients. This therapy has expanded to multiple centers across North America and worldwide with similar results. This review addresses these data, specifically focusing on conversion to resection and palliation of colorectal liver metastases after patients have received multiple lines of systemic chemotherapy.
Purpose:
Identify risk factors for biliary toxicity in patients with colorectal liver metastases who received floxuridine (FUDR) via a surgically implanted hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP). Describe the incidence of biliary toxicity and evaluate relevant patterns in the biliary toxicity cohort.
Methods:
A single center, retrospective, case-control study included adult colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received at least one cycle of FUDR via a surgically implanted HAIP from 1 January 2017, to 1 October 2021. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete records, cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis, or received concurrent mitomycin and FUDR. Biliary toxicity criteria derived from existing HAIP literature were utilized to determine whether patients experienced biliary toxicity. Multiple variables were compared by univariate statistical analysis between the biliary toxicity and non-biliary toxicity cohorts to identify potential risk factors for development of FUDR-induced biliary toxicity.
Results:
Out of 50 patients who had a HAIP implanted, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Five of the 39 patients (12.7%) included in the analysis met the pre-specified biliary toxicity criteria. No risk factors for biliary toxicity were identified. All five patients who developed biliary toxicity demonstrated elevations in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) prior to meeting the toxicity criteria.
Conclusion:
Biliary toxicity remains a significant and therapy-limiting consequence of FUDR administration. Rising ALP may be an early indicator of subsequent biliary toxicity. Future studies with more patients may identify risk factors that can facilitate risk mitigation strategies.
For patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver alone, complete resection offers the only chance for long-term disease-free survival and cure. With the evolution of surgical technique and systemic chemotherapy options, as many as 20% can expect to live for more than 10 years after surgery, the great majority of whom are cured. At least two features of colorectal liver metastasis preclude the potential for cure. First, up to 80% of patients present with metastatic disease that is limited to the liver but not amenable to resection. And second, after resection, as many as two-thirds of patients develop recurrent disease in the liver, many of whom are not candidates for additional surgical treatment. Over the past several decades, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy has emerged as a treatment option that addresses both of these problems by (1) increasing the likelihood of downstaging unresectable disease so that potentially curable surgery is possible and (2) reducing the likelihood of liver recurrence after resection. This chapter will focus on the rationale for this treatment approach, the technique of delivering the therapy, and the oncologic outcomes associated with its use.
Colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) represent the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. Surgical resection is the only treatment that can provide the possibility of prolonged survival or even cure. However, only 20% of patients are initially resectable at the time of diagnosis and 80% do not benefit from surgery. Over the past three decades, the survival of these latter patients has dramatically improved as a result of more effective chemotherapy, a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of the tumors, the extension of surgical indications, and the development of new surgical procedures aiming to increase resectability. The principle of the so-called “oncosurge approach” is to downsize the initially unresectable CLM using the most efficient chemotherapy regimens, to convert unresectable CLM to resectable disease, and to provide a better long-term survival after resection. While the 5-year survival rate does not exceed 5–10% in patients treated with chemotherapy only, the combination of downsizing chemotherapy and surgery is associated with a 33% 5-year and a 23% 10-year survival rate. Therefore, the decision-making strategy to achieve resectability through a multidisciplinary team approach (MDT) is essential for patients with initially unresectable CLM. Concurrent developments of both new treatment modalities (e.g., immune checkpoint blockade, liver transplantation) and predictive tumor and host biomarkers (e.g., molecular tumor profiling, pharmacologic genotyping) will further personalize and improve the efficacy of the “onco-surge” approach, thus increasing the need for MDT.
Background
The purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (TOMOX) to those of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).
Methods
Patients with unresectable CRCLM were randomly assigned to receive HAI of TOMOX or FOLFOX. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) measured from the date of randomisation until the date of disease progression and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were overall survival (OS) measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause, disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events.
Results
113 patients were randomly assigned. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, the PFS was 5.8 months [95% CI, 4.838–6.762]) and 4.6 months [95% CI, 3.419–5.781; P = 0.840], and the median OS was 17.6 months [95% CI, 13.828–21.372] and 13.1 months [95% CI, 11.215–14.985; P = 0.178] for the FOLFOX and TOMOX arm, respectively. The ORR were 26.1% vs 22.4% and DCR were 80.4% vs 71.4% in the FOLFOX and TOMOX arms. The most common severe adverse event was elevation of liver enzymes and pain, which did not differ in the two arms.
Conclusion
HAI chemotherapy was effective for unresectable CRCLM. HAI of FOLFOX has similar efficacy to TOMOX, and HAI of TOMOX had shorter arterial infusion time.
Clinical Trial Registration
https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02557490.
Purpose:
Various chemotherapy administration methods have been used to prevent liver metastasis (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these different methods in preventing LM in CRC patients who underwent curative surgery.
Method:
A systematic search of randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery was conducted. The primary outcome was the LM rate.
Results:
This network meta-analysis included 19 studies reporting on 12,588 participants, comparing portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVIC) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus systematic chemotherapy (SC) versus surgery alone. The HAIC group had the lowest LM rate when compared to the other three groups (odds ratio [OR] of PVIC vs. HAIC: 1.86; OR of SC vs. HAIC: 1.98; and HAIC vs. surgery alone: 0.43). The LM rate did not differ significantly between PVIC, SC, and surgery alone. The recurrence rates were lower for PVIC and HAIC than for surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.92] and 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.77]). The mortality rates of patients undergoing PVIC and HAIC were lower than that of patients undergoing surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64-0.93] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]). Anastomotic leakage, cardiopulmonary leakage, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, oral ulceration, wound infection, or ileus did not differ significantly between the four groups. PVIC showed the highest hepatic toxicity rate compared to those for SC, HAIC, and surgery alone.
Conclusion:
HAIC might be a satisfactory method for preventing LM in patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.
Purpose
The purpose of this critical review is to provide an overview of the role and outcomes associated with the use of local therapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers.
Materials and Methods
A review of clinical data was performed to describe outcomes associated with the use of systemic therapy and/or locoregional therapies for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers including esophagus, gastric, liver, biliary, pancreas, colorectal, and anal canal.
Results
This review describes outcomes associated with current first line systemic therapy and oligometastasis directed locoregional therapy for patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Available data suggest that for well selected patients amongst each gastrointestinal disease subsite, the use of local therapy is associated with favorable disease control and possible survival benefit.
Conclusions
These data emphasize the importance of multi-disciplinary collaboration and consideration of radiotherapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers to improve locoregional control and progression-free survival. Multiple trials are ongoing to determine if metastasis-directed radiotherapy improves overall survival.
Colorectal cancer is common in incidence and half of patients develop liver metastases over the course of their disease. Complete surgical resection of liver metastases remains the only potential curative option. Following an initial hepatectomy, approximately 45 percent of patients will develop recurrent liver-only metastases. The evidence base supporting aggressive surveillance following initial liver resection is limited. Repeat liver resection can be considered in patients with good functional status, adequate liver reserve, and where recurrent lesions are technically resectable. Repeat liver resections pose unique surgical challenges. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes following repeat liver resection are generally equivalent to that of the initial hepatectomy. When repeat resection is not feasible, systemic chemotherapy can be considered, as well as several alternative loco-regional treatment options.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers diagnosed in the United States. Many patients are diagnosed with synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis. Liver is the most common site of metastasis and is the leading contributing factor for cancer-related morbidity and mortality for CRC. The prognosis of the patient is highly dependent on the ability to eradicate disease through surgery. In addition, modern systemic chemotherapy has significantly contributed to increased overall survival as well as conversion of initially unresectable disease to resection in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Despite these improvements, there are still significant volume of patients who either experience early recurrence following surgery or remain with unresectable disease. Regional infusional therapy, such as the hepatic artery pump therapy, is gaining wider acceptance with its role established in adjuvant therapy following resection in high-risk patients, definitive treatment of high-volume disease with a goal of conversion to resection, and palliation for unresectable disease.KeywordsColorectal liver metastasisHepatic artery infusion pumpFloxuridine (FUDR)Gastroduodenal artery (GDA)
For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), regional therapies leverage the unique, dual blood supply to the liver; the hepatic artery is the main blood supply for liver tumors, whereas the portal vein supplies most normal hepatic parenchyma. Infusion of cancer therapies via the hepatic artery allows selective delivery to the tumors with relative sparing of normal liver tissue and little extrahepatic exposure, thus limiting systemic side effects. There is a paucity of randomized controlled trial evidence to inform the optimal integration of regional therapies into the management of CRLM. Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy has a potential survival benefit when used in the adjuvant setting after resection of CRLM. HAIP chemotherapy can be safely given with contemporary systemic therapies and is associated with a high objective response and rate of conversion to resectability in patients with uCRLM. Drug-eluting beads coated with irinotecan transarterial chemoembolization is associated with high objective response rates within the liver and has a well-established safety profile in patients with uCRLM. Transarterial radioembolization achieves high rates of response within the liver but is not associated with improvements in overall survival or quality of life in the first- or second-line setting for uCRLM. The best treatment approach is the one that most aligns with a given patients' values, preferences, and philosophy of care. In the first-line setting, HAIP could be offered to motivated patients who hope to achieve conversion to resectability. After progression on chemotherapy, HAIP, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization are valuable treatment options to consider for patients with liver-limited or liver-predominant CRLM who seek to optimize response rates and regional control.
Background and objectives:
Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve survival in patients with resected CRLM and to facilitate conversion of technically unresectable disease.
Methods:
Between 2016 and 2018, n = 22 HAI pumps were placed for CRLM. All patients received systemic chemotherapy concurrently with HAI floxuridine/dexamethasone. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
HAI pumps were placed in seven patients with completely resected CRLM and 15 patients with unresectable disease. Twenty-one patients received HAI floxuridine with a median of 5 total HAI cycles (interquartile range: 4-7). Biliary sclerosis was the most common HAI-related complication (n = 5, 24%). Of the 13 patients treated to convert unresectable CRLM, 3 (23%) underwent hepatic resection with curative intent after a median of 7 HAI cycles (range: 4-10). For all HAI patients, the mean OS was 26.7 months from CRLM diagnosis, while the median PFS and hepatic PFS from pump placement were 9 and 13 months, respectively.
Conclusion:
Concomitant HAI and systemic therapy can be utilized at multidisciplinary programs for patients with advanced CRLM, both in the adjuvant setting and to facilitate conversion of unresectable disease.
Purpose of Review
The surgical management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved over time. Most often, the management of asymptomatic primary CRC with simultaneous liver metastases (LM) proceeds with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. Although the timing of surgical resection has remained controversial, the ability to achieve R0 resection and the importance of patient selection remain widely accepted.
Recent Findings
Preoperative novel modalities such as portal vein ligation (PVL) or portal vein embolization (PVE) have allowed for improved surgical outcomes and decreased post-surgical morbidity. Combination or hybrid management has also seen increased utility by associating ablation therapies with surgical resection. Finally, patients with significant comorbidities and surgically unresectable disease have benefited greatly from locoregional salvage therapies such as percutaneous ablation and radioembolization.
Summary
Here we will review pertinent literature associated with surgical management for resectable disease and explore newly developed locoregional salvage therapies for unresectable disease.
Background:
Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) is a liver-directed therapy that delivers high-dose chemotherapy to the liver through the hepatic arterial system for colorectal liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Utilization of HAI is rapidly expanding worldwide.
Objective and methods:
This review describes the conduct of HAI pump implantation, with focus on common technical pitfalls and their associated solutions. Perioperative identification and management of common postoperative complications is also described.
Results:
HAI therapy is most commonly performed with the surgical implantation of a subcutaneous pump, and placement of its catheter into the hepatic arterial system for inline flow of pump chemotherapy directly to the liver. Intraoperative challenges and abnormal hepatic perfusion can arise due to aberrant anatomy, vascular disease, technical or patient factors. However, solutions to prevent or overcome technical pitfalls are present for the majority of cases. Postoperative HAI-specific complications arise in 22% to 28% of patients in the form of pump pocket (8%-18%), catheter (10%-26%), vascular (5%-10%), or biliary (2%-8%) complications. The majority of patients can be rescued from these complications with early identification and aggressive intervention to continue to deliver safe and effective HAI therapy.
Conclusions:
This HAI toolkit provides the HAI team a reference to manage commonly encountered HAI-specific perioperative obstacles and complications. Overcoming these challenges is critical to ensure safe and effective pump implantation and delivery of HAI therapy, and key to successful implementation of new programs and expansion of HAI to patients who may benefit from such a highly specialized treatment strategy.
Background:
Genetic evaluation is essential in assessing colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The aim of this study was to determine the pragmatic value of KRAS on oncological outcomes after CRLM according to the ESMO recommendations and to query whether it is necessary to request KRAS testing in each situation.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort of 126 patients who underwent surgery for hepatic resection for CRLM between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed. The patients were divided into three categories: wild-type KRAS, mutated KRAS and impractical KRAS according to their oncological variables. The impractical (not tested) KRAS group included patients with metachronous tumours and negative lymph nodes harvested. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and hepatic recurrence-free survival (HRFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Results:
Of the 108 patients identified, 35 cases had KRAS wild-type, 50 cases had a KRAS mutation and the remaining 23 were classified as impractical KRAS. Significantly longer medians for OS, HRFS and DFS were found in the impractical KRAS group. In the multivariable analyses, the KRAS mutational gene was the only variable that was maintained through OS, HRFS and DFS. For HRFS (HR: 13.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-100.62; p = 0.010 for KRAS), for DFS (HR: 10.06; 95% CI: 2.40-42.17; p = 0.002 for KRAS) and for OS (HR: 4.55%; 95% CI: 1.37-15.10; p = 0.013).
Conclusion:
Our study considers the possibility of unnecessary KRAS testing in patients with metachronous tumours and negative lymph nodes harvested. Combining the genetic mutational profile (i.e., KRAS in specific cases) with tumour characteristics helps patient selection and achieves the best prognosis after CRLM resection.
An estimated 70% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases during the course of their disease. While the first-line treatment for hepatic metastases is resection, most patients with colorectal liver-only or liver-dominant metastases (CRLM) present with unresectable disease and are not surgical candidates. In the past decade, locoregional liver-directed therapies have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with unresectable CRLM and chemotherapy-refractory disease. These treatments can be used to attempt conversion to surgical resectability, can control local disease progression, and have the potential to prolong survival. However, they have not yet become the standard of care in many practices. Each treatment has unique risks, and the clinical data are heterogeneous and thus difficult to interpret. In this article, we will review the most recent, high-impact literature on 3 common locoregional therapies used in the treatment of patients with unresectable CRLM: hepatic artery infusion pump chemotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 embolization. Ultimately, for this patient population, clinical decision-making requires a multidisciplinary discussion which should take into account individual patient characteristics and clinical expertise available at the treatment facility.
Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.
Background:
The Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation predicts negative outcomes following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pump chemotherapy. Less is known on the effects of KRAS mutation on tumor response in patients with unresectable CRLM undergoing HAI chemotherapy with floxuridine.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study investigating the effects of KRAS mutation on tumor response in patients with unresectable CRLM treated with HAI chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints included overall tumor response and conversion to resectability.
Results:
Twenty-five patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated with HAI chemotherapy between 2017-2019. Median number of liver lesions was 12 (range, 1-59) and almost all (n=24) had prior chemotherapy before starting HAI therapy. Median number of cycles administered via HAI pump was 6 (range, 3-12). Overall decrease in liver tumor burden was 63.5% (median; range, -257-100%) with an ORR of 20/25 (80%) and 10 (40%) patients converting to resectable status. Eleven (44%) patients had KRAS positive tumors. When compared to wild-type, KRAS positive tumors had less overall percent decrease (58% vs. 70%; P=0.04) and ORR (7/11 vs. 13/13; P=0.03). Fewer patients with KRAS positive tumors converted to resectable status during HAI therapy (2/11 vs. 8/13; P=0.05). At a median follow-up of 14.6 months (range, 4.0-36.6 months), overall survival is 45% among KRAS-positive and 77% for wild type patients.
Conclusions:
KRAS mutational status in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer predicts worse response to HAI chemotherapy compared to wild type.
Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T-cells has proven effective for hematologic malignancies but success in solid tumors has been impeded by poor intratumoral infiltration, exhaustion of effector cells from antigen burden, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Results from recent clinical trials and preclinical studies lend promising evidence of locoregional approaches for CAR T-cell delivery, priming the tumor microenvironment and for performing adjuvant therapies that sustain T-cell activity. Interventional oncology is a subspeciality of interventional radiology where imaging-guidance is used to perform percutaneous and catheter-directed procedures for localized, non-surgical therapy or interrogation of solid tumors. Interventional oncology provides unique synergies with immunotherapy, which has been well studied to improve treatment efficacy while reducing toxicities associated with systemic treatment. Besides aiding CAR T-cell delivery, priming or stimulation of the tumor microenvironment to promote effector survival and function, interventional oncology can also aid the monitoring of treatment response through selective, multiplex tumor sampling and catheter based venous sampling. This article presents an overview of interventional oncology, various procedures and its potential for advancing CAR T-cell immunotherapy of solid tumors.
For patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer who are not candidates for potentially curative resections, non-surgical local treatments may be useful. Non-surgical local treatments are classified according to how the treatment is administered. Local treatments are applied directly on hepatic parenchyma, such as radiofrequency, microwave hyperthermia and cryotherapy. Locoregional therapies are delivered through the hepatic artery, such as chemoinfusion, chemoembolization or selective internal radiation with Yttrium 90 radioembolization. The purpose of this review is to describe the different interventional therapies that are available for these patients in routine clinical practice, the most important clinical trials that have tried to demonstrate the effectiveness of each therapy and recommendations from principal medical oncologic societies.
Background
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the most common cause of disease-specific mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) combined with systemic chemotherapy improves survival for these patients. The safety of colorectal resection at the time of HAI pump placement has not been well established.Methods
Patients with CRLM who underwent combined HAI pump placement and colorectal (primary) resection or HAI pump placement alone were evaluated for perioperative outcomes, pump-specific complications, infectious complications, and time to treatment initiation. These outcomes were compared using comparative statistics.ResultsPatients who underwent combined HAI pump placement and primary resection (n = 19) vs HAI pump placement alone (n = 13) had similar demographics and rates of combined hepatectomy. Combined HAI pump placement and primary resection group had similar operative time and blood loss (both p = NS), but longer length of stay (6 vs 4 days, p = 0.02) compared to pump placement alone. Overall postoperative complications (21% vs 8%) and pump-specific complications (16% vs 31%) were similar (both p = NS). Infection rates were not different between groups, nor was time to initiation of HAI therapy (19 vs 16 days p = NS), or systemic therapy (34 vs 35 days p = NS).Conclusion
Combining colorectal resection with HAI pump implantation is a safe surgical approach for management of unresectable CRLM. Postoperative complications, specifically infectious complications, were not increased, nor was there a delay to initiation of HAI or systemic chemotherapy. Investigation of long-term oncologic outcomes for HAI pump placement and primary tumor resection in patients with unresectable CRLM is ongoing.
Background:
The aim of the study is to reveal the contribution of complete response (CR) to treatment to overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who attained CR to treatment and to examine the clinicopathologic features of the patient group with CR.
Methods:
This article is a retrospective chart review. Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer were divided into two groups. The systemic treatment was compared with the patients who received a full response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and those who did not attain CR (progression partial response and stable response) in terms of both PFS and OS data, and the effect of attaining CR to treatment on prognosis was evaluated.
Results:
A total of 222 patients were included in the study. 202 of 222 patients could be evaluated in terms of complete response. All data from their files were tabulated and analyzed retrospectively. The mean age of diagnosis of the study group was 60.13 ± 12.52 years. The total number of patients who attained CR to treatment was 31 (15.3%); 171 (84.6%) patients did not attain CR. Patients who had a CR had longer median PFS times than patients who did not have a CR (15.2 vs. 7.4 months, P<0.001). Patients who had CR had longer median survival times than patients who did not have a CR (39.2 vs. 16.9 months, P<0.001). In subgroup patients who underwent primary surgery, the number of patients who attained CR was statistically higher compared with the number of patients who did not attain CR (p<0.001). Complete response was less common in the presence of liver metastasis and bone metastasis (p = 0.041 and p = 0.046, respectively), had a negative prognostic effect. In other words, 89.1% of patients with liver metastasis, 100.0% of patients with bone metastasis, and 88.7% of those who died did not have a CR to the treatment. According to multivariate analysis, CR to treatment, primary surgery, first-line chemotherapy (combination compared with fluoropyrimidine), and no bone metastasis were found to be predictors for OS.
Conclusion:
Providing CR with systemic treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) contributes to prognosis. The primary resection in our secondary acquisitions from the study, the number of metastatic regions and the combination therapy regimens also contributed to the prognosis.
Background
Little is known about the influence of hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) therapy in the setting of chemotherapy resistant hepatic disease in the era of modern systemic therapies.
Methods
Patients who underwent HAIP therapy for chemotherapy resistant and unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were reviewed retrospectively.
Results
A total of 25 patients met inclusion criteria. 52% had isolated CRLM and 92% had five or more metastatic lesions. Partial response was noted in 40% of patients. Median hepatic progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months in those with extrahepatic disease versus 6 months in those with isolated CRLM at the time of HAIP placement (p = 0.75). Median overall survival was 8 months in patients with extrahepatic disease and 14 months in patients with isolated CRLM (p = 0.06).
Conclusions
Our findings are comparable to published data and augment the literature which supports HAIP use in chemotherapy-resistant, liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Background
To evaluate liver venous deprivation (LVD) outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients heavily pretreated with systemic and hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapies that had an anticipated insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE).
Methods
PVE was performed with liquid embolics using a transsplenic or ipsilateral transhepatic approach. Simultaneously and via a trans-jugular approach, the right hepatic vein was embolized with vascular plugs. Liver volumetry was assessed on computed tomography before and 3–6 weeks after LVD.
Results
Twelve consecutive CRLM patients that underwent LVD before right hepatectomy or trisectionectomy were included, all previously treated with systemic chemotherapy for a mean of 11.9 months. Six patients had additional HAIP. After embolization, FLR ratio increased from 28.7% ± 5.9 to 42.2% ± 9.0 (P < 0.01). Mean kinetic growth rate (KGR) was 3.56%/week ± 2.3, with a degree of hypertrophy (DH) of 13.8% ± 7.1. In the HAIP subgroup, mean KGR and DH were respectively 3.58%/week ± 2.8 and 14.3% ± 8.7. No severe complications occurred. Ten patients reached surgery after 39 days ± 7.5.
Conclusion
In heavily pretreated patients, LVD safely stimulated a rapid and effective FLR hypertrophy, with a resultant high rate of resection.
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting embolic trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.
Methods
A search was conducted on EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for prospective non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 20th June 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SR), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), while two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RR) and conversion-to-resection rates (CRR).
Results
71 prospective non-randomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond first line, DEE-TACE+SCT (n=152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95%-CI: 22.5-29.1) months and 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95%-CI: 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE+SCT appears to consistently have the highest pooled survival rates at 1-year (81.9%) and 2-years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE+SCT and HAI+SCT had the highest pooled-RRs of 56.7% (I²=0.90) and 62.6% (I²=0.87) respectively and pooled-CRRs of 35.5% (I²=0.00) and 30.3% (I²=0.80) respectively.
Conclusion
Albeit significant heterogeneity, paucity of high-quality evidence and the non-comparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE+SCT may have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.
Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases. Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies originating from the pancreas, breast, colon or rectum. This Primer summarizes the epidemiology, mechanisms and diagnosis of liver metastasis, discusses the various treatment options and effects on quality of life, and highlights ongoing and future research areas.
Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) entails the surgical implantation of a subcutaneous pump to deliver chemotherapeutic agents directly to the liver in the setting of primary or secondary liver cancer. The purpose of HAI chemotherapy is to maximize hepatic drug concentrations while minimizing systemic toxicity, facilitating more effective treatment. HAI is used in combination with systemic chemotherapy and can be considered in several clinical scenarios, including adjuvant therapy, conversion of unresectable disease to resectable disease, and unresectable disease. Radiologists are key members of the multidisciplinary team involved in the selection and management of these patients with complex liver disease. As these devices begin to be used at more sites across the country, radiologists should become familiar with the guiding principles behind pump placement, expected imaging appearances of these devices, and potential associated complications. The authors provide an overview of HAI therapy, with a focus on the key imaging findings associated with this treatment that radiologists may encounter. ©RSNA, 2021.
Simple Summary
Liver metastasis is a major therapeutic challenge and common cause of death for patients with colorectal cancer. While systemic treatment especially chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, selected patients with liver-only metastasis may further benefit from liver-directed therapies. Direct infusion of chemotherapy into the liver metastases via an implantable hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) is potentially an effective way to improve treatment response and survival in selected patients. Here, we reviewed the literature utilizing HAIP as a liver-directed modality alone and in combination with systemic chemotherapy. We discussed two cases who were successfully treated with this combinatorial approach and achieved remission or prolongation of disease control. We discussed the limitations, toxicities of combined systemic and HAIP modalities. Lastly, we provided insights on the use of HAIP in the modern era of systemic treatment for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy and the second most common cause of death in the US. Liver is the most common site of colorectal metastases. About 13% of patients with colorectal cancer have liver metastasis on initial presentation and 50% develop them during the disease course. Although systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the mainstay treatment for patients with metastatic disease, for selected patients with predominant liver metastasis, liver-directed approaches may provide prolonged disease control when combined with systemic treatments. Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy is an approach which allows direct infusion of chemotherapeutic into the liver and is especially useful in the setting of multifocal liver metastases. When combined with systemic chemotherapy, HAIP improves the response rate, provides more durable disease control, and in some patients leads to successful resection. To ensure safety, use of HAIP requires multidisciplinary collaboration between interventional radiologists, medical oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons and treatment nurses. Here, we review the benefits and potential risks with this approach and provide our single institution experience on two CRC patients successfully treated with HAIP in combination with systemic chemotherapy. We provide our recommendations in adopting this technique in the current era for patient with colorectal liver metastases.
This study investigated the efficacy and safety of adding systemic (IV) bevacizumab (Bev) to hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR)/dexamethasone (Dex) in unresectable primary liver cancer.
Patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were treated with HAI FUDR/Dex plus IV Bev. Results were compared to a recent study of HAI without Bev in a similar patient population.
Twenty-two patients (18 ICC, 4 HCC) were treated with HAI FUDR/Dex plus Bev; 7 (31.8%) had partial response and 15 (68.2%) had stable disease. Median survival was 31.1 months (CI 14.14-33.59), progression-free survival (PFS) 8.45 months (CI 5.53-11.05), and hepatic PFS 11.3 months (CI 7.93-15.69). In the previous trial with HAI alone (no Bev), the response was 50%; median survival, PFS, and hepatic PFS were 29.5, 7.3, and 10.1 months. In the present trial, bilirubin elevation (>2 mg/dl) was seen in 24% of patients and biliary stents were placed in 13.6%, versus 5.8 and 0%, respectively, in the HAI trial without Bev. Due to increased biliary toxicity, the trial was prematurely terminated.
Adding Bev to HAI FUDR/Dex appeared to increase biliary toxicity without clear improvement in outcome (median PFS 8.45 vs. 7.3 months, and median survival 31.1 vs. 29.5 months, for HAI + Bev vs. HAI alone groups, respectively).
Prolonged survival after two-stage resection (TSR) of advanced colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be the result of selection of best responders to chemotherapy. The impact of complete resection in this well-selected group is controversial.
Data on 890 patients undergoing resection and 879 patients who received only chemotherapy for CLM were collected prospectively. We used intent-to-treat analysis to evaluate the survival of patients who underwent TSR. Additionally, we evaluated a cohort of nonsurgically treated patients selected to mirror the TSR population: colorectal metastases with liver-only disease, objective response to chemotherapy, and alive 1 year after chemotherapy initiation.
Sixty-five patients underwent the first stage of TSR; 62 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the medical group. TSR patients had a mean of 6.7 ± 3.4 CLM with mean size of 4.5 ± 3.1 cm. Nonsurgical patients had a mean of 5.9 ± 2.9 CLM with mean size of 5.4 ± 3.4 cm (not significant). Forty-seven TSR patients (72%) completed the second stage. Progression between stages was the main cause of noncompletion of the second stage (61%). After 50 months median follow-up, the 5-year survival rate was 51% in the TSR group and 15% in the medical group (P = .005). In patients who underwent TSR, noncompletion of TSR and major postoperative complications were independently associated with worse survival.
TSR is associated with excellent outcome in patients with advanced CLM as a result of both selection by chemotherapy and complete resection of metastatic disease.
We assessed the effectiveness of cetuximab plus chronomodulated irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (FA) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) (chrono-IFLO) administered as neoadjuvant chemotherapy to increase the resectability of colorectal liver metastases.
This was a phase II prospective trial with rate of liver metastases resection as primary end point. Forty-three patients with unresectable metastases were enroled: 9 with metastases >5 cm; 29 with multinodular (>4) disease; 1 with hilar location; 4 with extrahepatic lung disease. Treatment consisted of cetuximab at day 1 plus chronomodulated irinotecan 5-FU, FA and L-OHP for 2-6 days every 2 weeks. After the first 17 patients, doses were reduced for irinotecan to 110 mg m⁻², 5-FU to 550 mg m⁻² per day and L-OHP to 15 mg m⁻² per day.
Macroscopically complete resections were performed in 26 out of 43 patients (60%) after a median of 6 (range 3-15) cycles. Partial response was noticed in 34 patients (79%). Median overall survival was 37 months (95% CI: 21-53 months), with a 2-year survival of 68% in the entire population, 80.6% in resected patients and 47.1% in unresected patients (P=0.01). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 93% and 36% of patients before and after dose reduction.
Cetuximab plus chrono-IFLO achieved 60% complete resectability of colorectal liver metastases.
Background/Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) on initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
From May 2005 to December 2008, FOLFOX was administered to 71 patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Hepatic resection was performed promptly after CRLM became resectable.
Twenty-six patients (37%) were downstaged as being resectable. The mean interval between the first FOLFOX and hepatic resection was six months (range, 3-7 months), and 7.1 courses (range, 2-12). Operative morbidity was 12% and mortality was nil. The median progression-free survival time was 19 and 7 months, and the median survival time was over 48 and 20 months, in finally resectable and unresectable patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that additional hepatic resection was the only independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 4.80, p<0.01).
FOLFOX is an effective chemotherapeutic regimen leading to successful hepatic resection and an excellent prognosis for patients with initially CRLM.
Phase II studies have shown that the combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (the XELIRI regimen) is active in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). There are, however, no data about the use of the XELIRI regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment.
Patients with unresectable liver-only metastases of MCRC with < or = 75 years of age were randomised to either the XELIRI (irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) given on day one and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily from day 2-15, every 21 days) or the FOLFIRI arm (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2), 5-FU 400 mg/m(2), LV 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)--all given on day one, every 14 days). Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and rate of radical (R0) surgical resection. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety.
Altogether 87 patients were enrolled (41 pts in the XELIRI and 46 pts in the FOLFIRI arm). The median age was 63 years (63 years in the XELIRI and 62 years in the FOLFIRI arm) (p = 0.33). ORR was 49% in the XELIRI and 48% in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.76). The rate of radical R0 resection was 24% in both arms of patients. At the end of treatment, 37% of patients in the XELIRI and 26% of patients in the FOLFIRI arm were without evidence of the disease (CR+R0 resection) (p = 0.56). There were no statistical differences in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between both arms: diarrhoea 7% vs. 6%, neutropenia 5% vs. 13%, ischemic stroke 0 vs. 2%, acute coronary syndrome 2% vs. 4%, respectively. At the median follow up of 17 (range 1-39) months, the median PFS was 10.3 months in the XELIRI and 9.3 months in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.78), the median OS was 30.7 months in the XELIRI arm and 16.6 months in the FOLFIRI arm (p = 0.16).
The XELIRI regimen showed similar ORR as the FOLFIRI regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with MCRC. In addition, the XELIRI regimen showed similar PFS and OS with acceptable toxicity compared to the FOLFIRI regimen.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19912492.
Although oncosurgical strategies have demonstrated increased survival in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), their potential for cure is still questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome after combining downsizing chemotherapy and rescue surgery and to define prognostic factors of cure.
All patients with initially unresectable CLM who underwent rescue surgery and had a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Cure was defined as a disease-free interval > or = 5 years from last hepatic or extrahepatic resection until last follow-up.
Mean age of 184 patients who underwent resection (April 1988 through July 2002) was 56.9 years. Patients had a mean number of 5.3 metastases (bilobar in 76%), associated to extrahepatic disease in 27%. Surgery was possible after one (74%) or more (26%) lines of chemotherapy. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 33% and 27%, respectively. Of 148 patients with a follow-up > or = 5 years, 24 patients (16%) were considered cured (mean follow-up, 118.6 months), six (25%) of whom were considered cured after repeat resection of recurrence. Twelve "cured" patients (50%) had a disease-free interval more than 10 years. Cured patients more often had three or fewer metastases less than 30 mm (P = .03) responding to first-line chemotherapy (P = .05). Multivariate analysis identified maximum size of metastases less than 30 mm at diagnosis, number of metastases at hepatectomy three or fewer, and complete pathologic response as independent predictors of cure.
Cure can be achieved overall in 16% of patients with initially unresectable CLM resected after downsizing chemotherapy. In addition to increased survival, this oncosurgical approach has real potential for disease eradication.
In this report, we update survival (OS) and time-to-progression (TTP) data for the Intergroup trial N9741 after a median 5 years of follow-up by using risk-stratified and prognostic factor analyses to determine if treatment outcomes differ in specific patient subgroups.
A total of 1,691 patients were randomly assigned to one of seven fluorouracil-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing regimens. OS and TTP were calculated by treatment arm and baseline risk group (on the basis of WBC, performance status, number of sites of disease, and alkaline phosphatase). Multivariate prognostic factor analysis was used to assess clinical factors for their relationships to OS, TTP, response, and toxicity by using Cox and logistic regression models.
The observed 5-year survival with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) of 9.8% was better than with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL; 3.7%; P = .04) or with bolus irinotecan/oxaliplatin (IROX; 5.1%; P = .128). OS and TTP were significantly longer for FOLFOX (20.2 months and 8.9 months, respectively) than for IFL (14.6 months and 6.1 months, respectively; P < .001 for both) or for IROX (17.3 months and 6.7 months, respectively; P < .001 for both). OS differed by risk group: 20.7 months for low risk, 17.4 months for intermediate risk, and 9.4 months for high risk (P < .001). FOLFOX treatment was superior in all risk groups and was the most powerful prognostic factor for OS, TTP, response rate, and toxicity.
The 9.8% 5-year OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with first-line FOLFOX sets a new benchmark. Neither baseline risk group nor any prognostic factor examined was predictive of treatment-specific outcome. However, treatment efficacy and patient longevity varied as a function of risk group.
We have attemtped to evaluate the degree to which hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) or 5-fluorouracil produces higher hepatic and lower systemic drug concentrations than are achieved with corresponding peripheral venous infusions. Hepatic arterial catheters were placed for therapy in 15 patients with primary or metastatic liver cancer. Temporary hepatic venous catheters allowed direct sampling of drug levels in the hepatic venous effluent as well as measurement of hepatic blood flow. FdUrd was measured primarily by radioimmunoassay and fluorouracil by a high pressure liquid chromatographic system. Due to the limited sensitivities of these assays, short (40 to 60 min) infusions at dose rates 10 to 100 times those conventionally used were given in order to produce drug levels that could be measured reliably. Even at dose rates of 0.5 to 40 mg/kg of body weight/hr for FdUrd and 5.6 mg/kg of body weight/hr for fluorouracil, steady state drug levels were achieved in the bloodstream in 30 to 40 min and hepatic extraction could be quantified. The hepatic extraction of FdUrd is high with an extraction ratio (hepatic arterial level - hepatic venous level/hepatic arterial level) of 0.69 to 0.92 and a clearance of 0.81 to 2.3 liters/min. The hepatic extraction of fluorouracil, however, appears to be lower with an extraction ratio of 0.22 to 0.45 and a clearance of 0.24 to 0.45 liters/min. With hepatic arterial drug infusion, 94 to 99% of FdUrd and 19 to 51% of fluorouracil is extracted in one pass. Hepatic venous levels, which are one measure of intrahepatic drug concentration in the hepatic and tumor capillary bed, were 4-fold higher for FdUrd infusion and 1.5-fold higher for fluorouracil infusions when drug was given by the hepatic arterial route. Systemic FdUrd levels with hepatic arterial infusion were only about 25% of corresponding systemic levels with peripheral venous infusion. Systemic fluorouracil levels with hepatic arterial infusion were also lower and were about 60% of corresponding systemic levels with peripheral venous infusion. These results support hepatic arterial infusion as a means to improve the therapeutic index of FdUrd and fluorouracil in the treatment of cancer in the liver. Although molar equivalent dose rates of FdUrd and fluorouracil were used in this study, the differences in FdUrd and fluorouracil pharmacology as noted above may not be applicable to conventional hepatic arterial therapy where much lower dose rates are used. Nonetheless, this type of analytical approach should prove valuable in the evaluation of other agents for hepatic arterial chemotherapy.
Long-term survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has been achieved only in patients who underwent complete resection of metastases. Such surgery could be performed in a greater proportion of patients if effective chemotherapy could downstage previously unresectable metastases. This approach has been limited by the low tumor response rate achieved with conventional chemotherapy.
We studied the outcome of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with a three-drug chemotherapy regimen followed by liver metastases surgery whenever possible.
From March 1988 to June 1994, 151 patients with colorectal liver metastases were considered initially unresectable because of large tumor size (> 5 cm), multinodular (> 4) or ill-located metastases. All patients received fully ambulatory chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (chronotherapy in 83% of them). They were periodically reassessed for surgery by a joint medico-surgical team.
In 151 patients, the size of liver metastases decreased by > 50% in 89 patients (59%) and median overall survival was 24 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 19-28 months), with 28% surviving at five years (20%-35%). Surgery with curative intent was attempted in 77 patients (51%), complete resection of liver metastases was achieved in 58 patients (38%). The median survival of the 77 operated patients was 48 months (25-71), with a five-year survival rate of 50% (38-61).
This new strategy of combining effective chemotherapy with surgery apparently altered the natural history of unresectable colorectal cancer metastases.
Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, has shown promising preclinical and clinical activity against metastatic colorectal cancer, particularly in combination with chemotherapy.
Of 813 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, we randomly assigned 402 to receive irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) plus bevacizumab (5 mg per kilogram of body weight every two weeks) and 411 to receive IFL plus placebo. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, the response rate, the duration of the response, safety, and the quality of life.
The median duration of survival was 20.3 months in the group given IFL plus bevacizumab, as compared with 15.6 months in the group given IFL plus placebo, corresponding to a hazard ratio for death of 0.66 (P<0.001). The median duration of progression-free survival was 10.6 months in the group given IFL plus bevacizumab, as compared with 6.2 months in the group given IFL plus placebo (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.54; P<0.001); the corresponding rates of response were 44.8 percent and 34.8 percent (P=0.004). The median duration of the response was 10.4 months in the group given IFL plus bevacizumab, as compared with 7.1 months in the group given IFL plus placebo (hazard ratio for progression, 0.62; P=0.001). Grade 3 hypertension was more common during treatment with IFL plus bevacizumab than with IFL plus placebo (11.0 percent vs. 2.3 percent) but was easily managed.
The addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy results in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Long-term survival is reported in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Recently, an increased number of reports on liver resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases has been published.
We analysed all published or presented trials and retrospective studies that report the rate of objective response and the rate of resection of initially unresectable metastases to correlate objective response and the rate of resection of metastases.
In studies that enrolled patients with metastases confined to the liver, 24-54% of patients were resected following chemotherapy, compared to 1-26% of patients in trials that included non-selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A strong correlation was found between response rates and the resection rate in studies with patients with isolated liver metastases (r = 0.96, P=0.002). Likewise, in studies with non-selected patients, the resection rate of metastases also was associated with the objective response rate (r = 0.74, P <0.001).
Patient selection and efficacy of pre-operative chemotherapy are both strong predictors for resectability of liver metastases. Resectability is a novel endpoint focusing on the curative potential of treatment compared with classical endpoints of response or progression-free survival that are important if palliation is the aim. Therefore, patients with potentially resectable liver metastases should be investigated in special trials and interdisciplinary teams.
The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI).
Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR).
A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032).
The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.
We have previously reported that neoadjuvant therapy with modified FOLFIRI enabled nearly a third of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to undergo surgical resection of liver metastases. Here, we present data from the long-term follow-up of these patients. Forty patients received modified FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg m(-2), day 1; folinic acid, 200 mg m(-2); and 5-fluorouracil: as a 400 mg m(-2) bolus, days 1 and 2, and a 48-h continuous infusion 1200 mg m(-2), from day 1. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, with response assessed every six cycles. Resected patients received six further cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively. Nineteen (47.5%) of 40 patients achieved an objective response; 13 (33%) underwent resection. After a median follow-up of 56 months, median survival for all patients was 31.5 months: for non-resected patients, median survival was 24 months and was not reached for resected patients. Median time to progression was 14.3 and 5.2 months for all and non-resected patients, respectively. Median disease-free (DF) survival in resected patients was 52.5 months. At 2 years, all patients were alive (8 DF), and at last follow-up, eight were alive (6 DF). Surgical resection of liver metastases after neoadjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRI in CRC patients achieved favourable survival times.
Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in selected patients has evolved as the standard of care during the last 20 years. In the absence of prospective randomized clinical trials, a survival benefit has been deduced relative to historical controls based on actuarial data. There is now sufficient follow-up on a significant number of patients to address the curative intent of resecting CLM.
Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on patients who underwent resection of CLM from 1985 to 1994. Postoperative deaths were excluded. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated from the time of hepatectomy using the Kaplan-Meier method.
There were 612 consecutive patients identified with 10-year follow-up. Median DSS was 44 months. There were 102 actual 10-year survivors. Ninety-nine (97%) of the 102 were disease free at last follow-up. Only one patient experienced a disease-specific death after 10 years of survival. In contrast, 34% of the 5-year survivors suffered a cancer-related death. Previously identified poor prognostic factors found among the 102 actual 10-year survivors included 7% synchronous disease, 36% disease-free interval less than 12 months, 25% bilobar metastases, 50% node-positive primary, 39% more than one metastasis, and 35% tumor size more than 5 cm.
Patients who survive 10 years appear to be cured of their disease, whereas approximately one third of actual 5-year survivors succumb to a cancer-related death. In well-selected patients, there is at least a one in six chance of cure after hepatectomy for CLM. The presence of poor prognostic factors does not preclude the possibility of long-term survival and cure.
e14658 Background: Unresectable primary liver cancer (UPLC), including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has poor median survival, typically 10 to 11 months. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) has previously shown efficacy, and adding bevacizumab (Bev) may induce changes in the tumor vasculature that improve local delivery of HAI. Methods: Patients with UPLC were treated with HAI of floxuridine (FUDR)/dexamethasone (Dex) administered as 2 week (w) infusion on a 4 w schedule with Bev 5 mg/kg administered IV Q 2w. Response, toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared to a recent study of HAI without Bev. We hypothesized that adding Bev would result in a 50% improvement in time to progression, which required 48 patients to detect with 90 % power. Results: Twenty-two patients (18 ICC/4 HCC) were treated with HAI FUDR/Dex plus Bev; 7 (31.8%) had partial response and 15 (68.2%) stable disease. Median survival, PFS, and hepatic progression free survival (HPFS) ...
Objective: To compare the efficacy of direct hepatic arterial chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
Design: Randomized trial with crossover allowed from systemic to intrahepatic therapy if tumor progression occurred on systemic therapy.
Setting: Academic medical center, referral-based clinic.
Patients: One hundred sixty-two patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma agreed to be randomly assigned to treatment groups. At laparotomy, 63 were excluded from the study: 25 had hepatic resection; 33, extrahepatic disease; 1, infection; and 4, no tumor.
Intervention: Fourteen-day continuous infusion of fluorodeoxyuridine each month using an Infusaid pump (0.3 and 0.15 mg/kg body weight d in the intrahepatic and systemic arms, respectively).
Main Results: Intrahepatic therapy produced a significantly higher complete and partial response rate, 50%, compared with 20% for systemic therapy (p = 0. 001). After tumor progression, 60% of the systemic patients crossed over to intrahepatic therapy; 25% then had a partial response, and 33% a minor response or stabilization of disease on intrahepatic therapy.
Toxicity included ulcer disease (17%) and biliary sclerosis (8%) in patients receiving intrahepatic therapy and diarrhea (70%) in patients receiving systemic therapy. Extrahepatic disease occurred in 56% and 37% of the patients in the intrahepatic and systemic groups, respectively (p = 0.092). The median survivals were 17 and 12 months, for the intrahepatic and systemic groups, respectively.
Conclusion: When compared with systemic therapy, hepatic arterial chemotherapy significantly increases response rate for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma and appears to be a more effective treatment.
Systemic bevacizumab (Bev) was added to hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) floxuridine (FUDR)-based chemotherapy in three studies in an attempt to improve outcomes. A specific review of biliary toxicity was carried out.
This analysis included 203 patients from three prospective studies. The first (study A) was an adjuvant study after liver resection of colorectal metastases in which patients received HAI and systemic chemotherapy (Sys) with or without Bev. Study B comprised unresectable colorectal patients who received HAI and Sys plus Bev. Study C included patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma or hepatocellular carcinoma who received HAI plus systematic Bev. The outcome and toxicity of patients in studies B and C were compared with historical controls.
In all three studies, the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia and biliary stent placement within 1 year of treatment was increased with the addition of Bev. In the no-Bev versus Bev groups, the placement of biliary stents was as follows: study A, 0 of 38 versus 4 of 35 patients (p = 0.05); study B, 0 of 49 versus 3 of 24 (p = 0.06); and study C, 0 of 34 versus 3 of 22 (p = 0.15). Elevation in bilirubin was noted in the no-Bev versus Bev groups: study A, 0 of 38 versus 5 of 35 patients (p = 0.02); study B, 1 of 49 versus 7 of 24 (p = 0.005); and study C, 2 of 34 versus 5 of 22 (p = 0.10). The addition of Bev did not seem to be associated with improved progression-free or overall survival.
The addition of Bev to HAI FUDR resulted in increased biliary toxicity in three separate studies. Although the sample sizes were small, there was no evidence of improved PFS or OS with the addition of Bev. Bev should not be combined with HAI FUDR.
Background:
Survival with long-term follow-up following liver resection for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy has rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the chance of cure following liver resection for initially unresectable CRLM.
Methods:
Between January 2000 and December 2009, 61 patients underwent hepatectomy for unresectable liver-only CRLM downsized after chemotherapy. Cure was defined as a recurrence-free interval of at least 5 years after primary hepatectomy.
Results:
Resectability of CRLM was achieved after a mean number of 11 courses, and 42.6 % of patients underwent liver resection after ≥10 courses. Postoperative mortality was nil, and morbidity rate was 19.7 %. The 5- and 10-year actuarial overall survival rates were 42.6 and 16.0 %. Of 30 patients with a follow-up ≥5 years, 11 were alive, yielding a 5-year actual overall survival rate of 36.7 %, and 7 (23.3 %) were considered cured because they are alive without recurrence. On multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of both overall and disease-free survival.
Conclusions:
Cure can be achieved in about 23 % of patients resected for initially unresectable CRLM downsized by chemotherapy. Liver resection can be safely performed in selected patients even after multiple courses of chemotherapy.
Background:
Standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) volume and degree of hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE) have been recognized as important predictors of surgical outcomes after major liver resection. However, the regeneration rate of the FLR after PVE varies among individuals and its clinical significance is unknown.
Study design:
Kinetic growth rate (KGR) is defined as the degree of hypertrophy at initial volume assessment divided by number of weeks elapsed after PVE. In 107 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with an sFLR volume >20%, the ability of the KGR to predict overall and liver-specific postoperative morbidity and mortality was compared with sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy.
Results:
Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best cutoff values for sFLR volume, degree of hypertrophy, and KGR for predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency were estimated as 29.6%, 7.5%, and 2.0% per week, respectively. Among these, KGR was the most accurate predictor (area under the curve 0.830 [95% CI, 0.736-0.923]; asymptotic significance, 0.002). A KGR of <2% per week vs ≥2% per week correlates with rates of hepatic insufficiency (21.6% vs 0%; p = 0.0001) and liver-related 90-day mortality (8.1% vs 0%; p = 0.04). The predictive value of KGR was not influenced by sFLR volume or the timing of initial volume assessment when evaluated within 8 weeks after PVE.
Conclusions:
Kinetic growth rate is a better predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection for small FLR than conventional measured volume parameters (ie, sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy).
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths expected in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival based on incidence data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. A total of 1,638,910 new cancer cases and 577,190 deaths from cancer are projected to occur in the United States in 2012. During the most recent 5 years for which there are data (2004-2008), overall cancer incidence rates declined slightly in men (by 0.6% per year) and were stable in women, while cancer death rates decreased by 1.8% per year in men and by 1.6% per year in women. Over the past 10 years of available data (1999-2008), cancer death rates have declined by more than 1% per year in men and women of every racial/ethnic group with the exception of American Indians/Alaska Natives, among whom rates have remained stable. The most rapid declines in death rates occurred among African American and Hispanic men (2.4% and 2.3% per year, respectively). Death rates continue to decline for all 4 major cancer sites (lung, colorectum, breast, and prostate), with lung cancer accounting for almost 40% of the total decline in men and breast cancer accounting for 34% of the total decline in women. The reduction in overall cancer death rates since 1990 in men and 1991 in women translates to the avoidance of about 1,024,400 deaths from cancer. Further progress can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population, with an emphasis on those groups in the lowest socioeconomic bracket.
Background:
This study investigates the possible benefits of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases.
Methods:
This phase II study, originally started as a phase III design, randomly assigned 119 patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases between systemic treatment (n = 59) or systemic treatment plus RFA ( ± resection) (n = 60). Primary objective was a 30-month overall survival (OS) rate >38% for the combined treatment group.
Results:
The primary end point was met, 30-month OS rate was 61.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.2-73.9] for combined treatment. However, 30-month OS for systemic treatment was 57.6% (95% CI 44.1-70.4), higher than anticipated. Median OS was 45.3 for combined treatment and 40.5 months for systemic treatment (P = 0.22). PFS rate at 3 years for combined treatment was 27.6% compared with 10.6% for systemic treatment only (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95, P = 0.025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 11.7-22.1) and 9.9 months (95% CI 9.3-13.7), respectively.
Conclusions:
This is the first randomized study on the efficacy of RFA. The study met the primary end point on 30-month OS; however, the results in the control arm were in the same range. RFA plus systemic treatment resulted in significant longer PFS. At present, the ultimate effect of RFA on OS remains uncertain.
Hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy (HAIPC) contributes to the prolonged survival of selected patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). The most clinically important adverse event after HAIPC with floxuridine (FUDR) is biliary sclerosis (BS). Little is known about the etiology of BS.
HAIPC was administered to 475 consecutive patients who received HAIPC on prospective protocols from 1991 to 2008. The incidence, clinical features, variables related to demographics, comorbidity, medical history, CRCLM, surgery, chemotherapy, and laboratory data were reviewed. An analysis of factors potentially associated with BS, defined as a biliary stricture related to HAIPC requiring stent placement, was performed.
The incidence of BS was 5.5% (16 of 293) in patients receiving HAIPC as an adjuvant therapy after hepatectomy, and 2% (2 of 100) in patients receiving HAIPC with FUDR for unresectable disease. The common hepatic duct was the site most frequently affected (87.5%). In patients receiving adjuvant HAIPC, BS was associated with abnormal postoperative flow scans (18.8% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.006), postoperative infectious complications (50.0% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.002), and larger dose/cycle/weight of FUDR (2.6 vs. 2.0 mg/cycle/kg, P = 0.025) than patients without BS. No patient died directly of BS. Median survival was not compromised by the development of BS (BS vs. non-BS: 61.0 months [range 6.2-171.6 months] vs. 47.2 months [range 2.4-200.8 months], P = 0.316, respectively).
BS is an uncommon complication after HAIPC and does not compromise survival if adequately salvaged by stenting or dilatation. Surgical complications as well as type and dose of intra-arterial chemotherapy may contribute to the development of BS.
Selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be rendered resectable after systemic chemotherapy. We reviewed the evidence of downsizing systemic chemotherapy followed by rescue liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable CLM.
Literature search of databases (Medline and PubMed) to identify published studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection in patients with initially unresectable CLM was undertaken and focused on response rate of chemotherapy and survival outcomes.
Ten observational studies were reviewed. A total of 1,886 patients with initially unresectable CLM underwent systemic chemotherapy. An objective response was observed in 64% (range, 43-79%) of patients after systemic chemotherapy. Of these, 22.5% underwent macroscopically curative liver resection. Median overall survival was 45 (range, 36-60) months with 19% of patients alive and recurrence-free.
Current evidence suggests that downsizing systematic chemotherapy followed by rescue liver resection is safe and effective for selected patients with initially unresectable CLM. Further studies are required to examine response rates and secondary resectability using new targeted molecular therapy-based regimens.
To determine the local recurrence rate and factors associated with recurrence after intraoperative ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent ablation of a hepatic colorectal cancer metastasis in the operating room from April 1996 to March 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox models were used to determine recurrence rates and assess significance.
Ablation was performed in 10% (n = 158 patients) of all cases during the study period. Seventy-eight percent were performed in conjunction with a liver resection. Of the 315 tumors ablated, most tumors were ≤ 1 cm in maximum diameter (53%). Radiofrequency ablation was used to treat most of the tumors (70%). Thirty-six tumors (11%) had local recurrence as part of their recurrence pattern. Disease recurred in the liver or systemically after 212 tumors (67%) were ablated. On univariate analysis, tumor size greater than 1 cm was associated with a significantly increased risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.5, P = 0.013). The 2 year ablation zone recurrence-free survival was 92% for tumors ≤ 1 cm compared to 81% for tumors >1 cm. On multivariate analysis, tumor size of >1 cm, lack of postoperative chemotherapy, and use of cryotherapy were significantly associated with a higher local recurrence rate.
Intraoperative ablation appears to be highly effective treatment for hepatic colorectal tumors ≤ 1 cm.
Irinotecan and weekly cetuximab (I+C) is a standard second-line regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of every 2 weeks I+C in patients with mCRC.
Patients with mCRC refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin regimens and not previously treated with I+C were eligible. Response rate (RR) was the primary endpoint. Cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) were administered intravenously (I.V.) on day 1 every 2 weeks.
Patient characteristics (n = 31): male (n = 17), median age 62; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤1 (n = 30), and PS = 2 (n = 1). Median number of cycles = 3 (range, 1-22). I+C doses were modified in 18 and 12 patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events: acneiform rash (n = 6); neutropenia (n = 6); and diarrhea (n = 5); there was one grade 5 respiratory failure, possibly related to therapy. Two patients had a partial response, 11 had stable disease, and 18 had progressive disease resulting in an overall RR of 6% and disease control rate of 41.9%. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.1-15), and time to progression (TTP) was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.3-4.6). K-ras and BRAF mutations were detected in 39% and 9%, respectively, of the patients tested. There was a trend toward longer TTP among patients with wild-type K-ras and BRAF (2.6 vs. 1.7 months; P = 0.16), and OS was significantly longer in those patients (14.1 vs. 5.5 months; P = 0.04).
The RR and TTP were lower than expected and may reflect the reduced dose intensity due to toxicities. While the OS was consistent with previous publications, the efficacy of this combination was not demonstrated.
This prospective phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Patients with mCRC who progressed or relapsed after first-line oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based treatment received bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg/week plus chemotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease-control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Fifty-three patients (66% men; median age, 62 years old) received second-line bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 57%), folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 26%), irinotecan (15%), or capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI; 2%). The DCR was 87% (95% CI, 77%-97%); ORR was 32% (95% CI, 19%-46%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.8 months) and median OS 19.3 months, (95% CI, 14.2-25.1 months).The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (15%), asthenia, and vomiting (9% each). Five patients (9%) had grade 3/4 targeted toxicities: grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), grade 3 venous thromboembolism (n = 2), and grade 4 arterial thromboembolism (n = 1). None of these events led to death during the study.
Bevacizumab plus standard second-line chemotherapy is highly active in patients with mCRC and has an acceptable safety profile.
Add systemic bevacizumab (Bev) to adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus systemic therapy after liver resection to increase recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Patients were randomly assigned to HAI plus systemic therapy with or without Bev. If 1-year RFS of ≥ 80% was obtained in Bev arm, then the regimen would be studied further. HAI with fluorodeoxyuridine plus dexamethasone was given on days 1 to 14 of a 5-week cycle. Systemic therapy and Bev 5 mg/kg was delivered on days 15 and 29: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², and fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m² infusion for 2 days (if patients received prior oxaliplatin, then irinotecan 150 mg/m² was used). RFS and survival were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test.
The two arms had similar characteristics: synchronous disease (66% v 63%), more than one metastasis (84% v 74%), and clinical risk score ≥ 3 (50% v 46%) for no Bev versus Bev arms, respectively. With a median follow-up of 30 months, 4-year survival was 85% and 81% (P = .5), and 4-year RFS was 46% versus 37%; 1-year RFS was 83% and 71% (P = .4) for no Bev versus Bev arms. Bilirubin > 3 mg/dL was seen in zero of 38 versus five of 35 patients (P = .02) and biliary stents were placed in zero versus four patients (P = .05) in no Bev versus Bev arms.
The addition of Bev to adjuvant HAI plus systemic therapy after liver resection did not seem to increase RFS or survival but appeared to increase biliary toxicity. Four-year survival was 85% and 81% for no Bev and Bev arms, respectively.
This study analyzes factors associated with differences in long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over time.
Sixteen-hundred consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1985 and 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into 2 eras according to changes in availability of systemic chemotherapy: era I, 1985 to 1998; era II, 1999 to 2004.
There were 1,037 patients in era I and 563 in era II. Operative mortality decreased from 2.5% in era I to 1% in era II (p = 0.04). There were no differences in age, Clinical Risk Score, or number of hepatic metastases between the 2 groups; however, more recently treated patients (era II) had more lymph node-positive primary tumors, shorter disease-free intervals, more extrahepatic disease, and smaller tumors. Median follow-up was 36 months for all patients and 63 months for survivors. Median and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were better in era II (64 months and 51% versus 43 months and 37%, respectively; p < 0.001); but median and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients were not different (23 months and 33% era II versus 22 months and 27% era I; p = 0.16). There was no difference in RFS or DSS for high-risk (Clinical Risk Score >2, n = 506) patients in either era. There was a marked improvement in both RFS and DSS for low risk (Clinical Risk Score < or =2, n = 1,094) patients.
Despite worse clinical and pathologic characteristics, survival but not recurrence rates after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases have improved over time and might be attributable to improvements in patient selection, operative management, and chemotherapy. The improvement in survival over time is largely accounted for by low-risk patients.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases can downsize tumours for curative resection. We assessed the effectiveness of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in this setting.
Between Dec 2, 2004, and March 27, 2008, 114 patients were enrolled from 17 centres in Germany and Austria; three patients receiving FOLFOX6 alone were excluded from the analysis. Patients with non-resectable liver metastases (technically non-resectable or > or =5 metastases) were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab with either FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid; group A) or FOLFIRI (irinotecan, fluorouracil, and folinic acid; group B). Randomisation was not blinded, and was stratified by technical resectability and number of metastases, use of PET staging, and EGFR expression status. They were assessed for response every 8 weeks by CT or MRI. A local multidisciplinary team reassessed resectability after 16 weeks, and then every 2 months up to 2 years. Patients with resectable disease were offered liver surgery within 4-6 weeks of the last treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was tumour response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST), analysed by modified intention to treat. A retrospective, blinded surgical review of patients with radiological images at both baseline and during treatment was done to assess objectively any changes in resectability. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153998.
56 patients were randomly assigned to group A and 55 to group B. One patient in each group were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because they discontinued treatment before first full dose, one patient in group B was excluded because of early pulmonary embolism. A confirmed partial or complete response was noted in 36 (68%) of 53 patients in group A, and 30 (57%) of 53 patients in group B (difference 11%, 95% CI -8 to 30; odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 0.74-3.59; p=0.23). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were skin toxicity (15 of 54 patients in group A, and 22 of 55 patients in group B), and neutropenia (13 of 54 patients in group A and 12 of 55 patients in group B). R0 resection was done in 20 (38%) of 53 patients in group A and 16 (30%) of 53 of patients in group B. In a retrospective analysis of response by KRAS status, a partial or complete response was noted in 47 (70%) of 67 patients with KRAS wild-type tumours versus 11 (41%) of 27 patients with KRAS-mutated tumours (OR 3.42, 1.35-8.66; p=0.0080). According to the retrospective review, resectability rates increased from 32% (22 of 68 patients) at baseline to 60% (41 of 68) after chemotherapy (p<0.0001).
Chemotherapy with cetuximab yields high response rates compared with historical controls, and leads to significantly increased resectability.
Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer.
Purpose
To determine the conversion to resectability in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus systemic oxaliplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11).
Patients and Methods
Forty-nine patients with unresectable liver metastases (53% previously treated with chemotherapy) were enrolled onto a phase I protocol with HAI floxuridine and dexamethasone plus systemic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and irinotecan.
Results
Ninety-two percent of the 49 patients had complete (8%) or partial (84%) response, and 23 (47%) of the 49 patients were able to undergo resection in a group of patients with extensive disease (73% with > five liver lesions, 98% with bilobar disease, 86% with ≥ six segments involved). For chemotherapy-naïve and previously treated patients, the median survival from the start of HAI therapy was 50.8 and 35 months, respectively. The only baseline variable significantly associated with a higher resection rate was female sex. Variables reflecting extensive anatomic disease, such as number of lesions or number of vessels involved, were not significantly associated with the probability of resection.
Conclusion
The combination of regional HAI floxuridine/dexamethasone and systemic oxaliplatin and irinotecan is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, demonstrating a 47% conversion to resection (57% in chemotherapy-naïve patients). Future randomized trials should compare HAI plus systemic chemotherapy with systemic therapy alone to assess the additional value of HAI therapy in converting patients with hepatic metastases to resectability.
Objective:
To assess feasibility, risks, and patient outcomes in the treatment of colorectal metastases with two-stage hepatectomy.
Summary background data:
Some patients with multiple hepatic colorectal metastases are not candidates for a complete resection by a single hepatectomy, even when downstaged by chemotherapy, after portal embolization, or combined with a locally destructive technique. In two-stage hepatectomy, the highest possible number of tumors is resected in a first, noncurative intervention, and the remaining tumors are resected after a period of liver regeneration. In selected patients with irresectable multiple metastases not amenable to a single hepatectomy procedure, two-stage hepatectomy might offer a chance of long-term remission.
Methods:
Of consecutive patients with conventionally irresectable colorectal metastases treated by chemotherapy, 16 of 398 (4%) became eligible for curative two-stage hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy and adjuvant nonsurgical interventions as indicated.
Results:
Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in 13 of 16 patients (81%). There were no surgical deaths. The postoperative death rate (2 months or less) was 0% for the first-stage procedure and 15% for the second-stage one. Postoperative complication rates were 31% and 45%, respectively, with only one complication leading to reoperation. The 3-year survival rate was 35%, with four patients (31%) disease-free at 7, 22, 36, and 54 months. Median survival was 31 months from the second hepatectomy and 44 months from the diagnosis of metastases.
Conclusions:
Two-stage hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may allow a long-term remission in selected patients with irresectable multiple metastases and increases the proportion of patients with resectable disease.
To assess feasibility, risks, and long-term outcome of 2-stage hepatectomy as a means to improve resectability of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).
Two-stage hepatectomy uses compensatory liver regeneration after a first noncurative hepatectomy to enable a second curative resection.
Between October 1992 and January 2007, among 262 patients with initially irresectable CLM, 59 patients (23%) were planned for 2-stage hepatectomy. Patients were eligible when single resection could not achieve complete treatment, even in combination with chemotherapy, portal embolization, or radiofrequency, but tumors could be totally removed by 2 sequential resections. Feasibility and outcomes were prospectively evaluated.
Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in 41 of 59 patients (69%). Eighteen patients failed to complete the second hepatectomy because of disease progression (n = 17) or bad performance status (n = 1). The 41 successfully treated patients had a mean number of 9.1 metastases (mean diameter, 48.5 mm at diagnosis). Chemotherapy was delivered before (95%), in between (78%), and after (78%) the 2 hepatectomies. Mean delay between the 2 liver resections was 4.2 months. Postoperative mortality was 0% and 7% (3/41) after the first and second hepatectomy, respectively. Morbidity rates were also higher after the second procedure (59% vs. 20%) (P < 0.001). Five-year survival was 31% on an intention to treat basis, and all but 2 patients who did not complete the 2-stage strategy died within 19 months. After a median follow-up of 24.4 months (range, 3.7-130.3), overall 3- and 5-year survivals for patients that completed both hepatectomies were 60% and 42%, respectively, after the first hepatectomy (median survival, 42 months from first hepatectomy and 57 months from metastases diagnosis). Disease-free survivals were 26% and 13% at 3 and 5 years, respectively.
Two-stage hepatectomy provides a 5-year survival of 42% and a hope of long-term survival for selected patients with extensive bilobar CLM, irresectable by any other means.
From 1960 to 1987, 1209 patients with colorectal liver metastases were recorded, and followed until 1 January 1990. In 242 cases the diagnosis was based on external imaging, whereas 967 patients had operative confirmation and staging of their liver disease. Three groups of patients were analysed: group 1 involved 921 cases, of whom 902 were deemed non-resectable whereas 19 could not be unequivocally classified. Only 21 patients lived for longer than 3 years, seven survived for 4 years, but there were no 5-year survivors. Group 2 comprised 62 highly selected patients who at laparotomy demonstrated resectable metastatic spread confined to the liver, but this was not treated mainly because of a formerly different therapeutic approach. These patients had a significantly longer median survival time (14.2 versus 6.9 months), but also failed to achieve 5-year survival. The 226 patients forming group 3 underwent hepatic resection with intent to cure. Nine of them had minimal macroscopic disease left, and 34 with all gross tumour removed had positive margins. Survival of patients with these 43 eventually non-radical resections followed an identical course as in group 2 (median survival 13.3 months, maximum 42 months). Of the 183 patients with potentially curative resection ten died after surgery (5.5 per cent). Actuarial 5 and 10-year survival rates in the remaining 173 patients were 40 and 27 per cent with 25 and seven patients alive at respective periods of time. Until 1 January 1990, 64 patients remained free from recurrent disease for up to 24 years. In three patients the tumour status at death was unclear. The other 106 patients developed definite cancer relapse. Nevertheless they demonstrated a prolongation of survival time by a median of 1 year when compared with the 43 non-radically resected patients or the 62 untreated patients with resectable liver-only metastases, and accomplished a maximum survival time of 8 years. Radical excision of colorectal secondaries to the liver therefore offers effective palliation, and in a small number the chance of a cure.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of direct hepatic arterial chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Design: Randomized trial with crossover allowed from systemic to intrahepatic therapy if tumor progression occurred on systemic therapy. Setting: Academic medical center, referral-based clinic. Patients: One hundred sixty-two patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma agreed to be randomly assigned to treatment groups. At laparotomy, 63 were excluded from the study: 25 had hepatic resection; 33, extrahepatic disease; 1, infection; and 4, no tumor. Intervention: Fourteen-day continuous infusion of fluorodeoxyuridine each month using an infusaid pump (0.3 and 0.15 mg/kg body weight X d in the intrahepatic and systemic arms, respectively). Main Results: Intrahepatic therapy produced a significantly higher complete and partial response rate, 50%, compared with 20% for systemic therapy (p = 0.001). After tumor progression, 60% of the systemic patients crossed over to intrahepatic therapy; 25% then had a partial response, and 33% a minor response or stabilization of disease on intrahepatic therapy. Toxicity included ulcer disease (17%) and biliary sclerosis (8%) in patients receiving intrahepatic therapy and diarrhea (70%) in patients receiving systemic therapy. Extrahepatic disease occurred in 56% and 37% of the patients in the intrahepatic and systemic groups, respectively (p = 0.092). The median survivals were 17 and 12 months, for the intrahepatic and systemic groups, respectively. Conclusion: When compared with systemic therapy, hepatic arterial chemotherapy significantly increases response rate for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma and appears to be a more effective treatment.
Sixty-four patients were entered into a randomized trial that evaluated intra-arterial (I.A.) versus intravenous (I.V.) 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) for colorectal liver metastases. There was a significant improved response rate for I.A. (62%) compared with I.V. (17%) treatment (p less than 0.003). However, the improved response rate for patients in whom I.A. therapy was used did not translate to a significantly improved survival rate. The 2-year actuarial survival rates for the groups for which I.A. and I.V. therapy was used were 22% and 15% respectively, with the survival curves not differing significantly (p = 0.27). These results may have been due to the inclusion of patients with tumor in draining hepatic lymph nodes. The presence of tumor in hepatic lymph nodes was associated with a poorer prognosis. Analysis of a subgroup of patients with negative hepatic lymph nodes suggested an improved actuarial survival rate in patients for whom I.A. versus I.V. therapy was used (p less than 0.03). The toxicity of I.A. FUDR was considerable, and side effects included chemical hepatitis (79%), biliary sclerosis (21%), peptic ulcers (17%), and gastritis/duodenitis (21%). The only major effect of toxicity of I.V. FUDR was severe diarrhea (59%). Regional I.A. FUDR allowed more drug delivery to liver tumors, which resulted in increased tumor responses when compared with use of systemic therapy. However, the small gain in survival seen in a select subgroup of patients with negative hepatic nodes appeared to be offset by the toxicity of I.A. FUDR.
Disappointment with the results of systemic chemotherapy for treatment of colorectal hepatic metastases has led to renewed interest in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Forty adult patients underwent preoperative examination, operative staging of the extent of liver involvement, and surgical placement of an implantable pump with the catheter in the hepatic arterial system. Twenty-one patients were previously untreated. Hepatic involvement ranged from 15% to 85%; none of the patients had unresectable extrahepatic disease. Operative complications occurred in 10% of the patients; there were no deaths. Treatment morbidity consisted of gastrointestinal tract inflammation and/or ulceration (48%) and hepatitis (65%). Partial tumor responses occurred in nine of 18 previously untreated patients and five of 16 previously treated patients. Use of an implantable pump for long-term hepatic arterial chemotherapy was associated with improved patient acceptance, minimal operative morbidity, and substantial tumor response to chemotherapy.
To determine the toxicity, response rate, and survival of a regimen of hepatic arterial floxuridine (FUDR) with leucovorin (LV) and dexamethasone (Dec) for the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
Sixty-two patients with hepatic metastases (33 previously untreated with chemotherapy) were treated with FUDR (0.30 mg/kg/d) and LV (15 mg/m2/d) and Dec (20 mg total dose) as a 14-day hepatic arterial infusion via an implantable pump alternating with 2 weeks of saline.
The complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) rate was 78% in previously untreated patients, with a median survival duration of 24.8 months; 1- and 2-year survival rates were 91% and 57%, respectively. In the previously treated group, the response rate was 52%, with a median survival duration of 13.5 months. Only 3% of patients (two of 62) developed biliary sclerosis; this was significantly lower than the 21% biliary sclerosis rate observed in our previous trial of hepatic arterial FUDR and LV without Dec (P = .002).
The addition of Dec to hepatic arterial FUDR and LV reduces biliary toxicity while maintaining an excellent response rate and survival. We recommend that this treatment be studied further.
The authors discuss the technique and evaluate the results of an aggressive surgical approach in patients with primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases that were downstaged by chronomodulated chemotherapy.
Resection is the best treatment of colorectal liver metastases, but it may be achieved in only 10% of patients. In the remaining 90%, survival is poor, even after partial response to chemotherapy. Little is known about the results of curative hepatectomy in patients whose metastases are downstaged by chemotherapy.
Fifty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases initially unresectable because of ill located (8), large (8), multinodular (24) lesions, or because of extrahepatic disease (13) were downstaged by a systemic chronomodulated chemotherapy associating 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and Oxaliplatin to the point that operation could be performed. This consisted of a major hepatectomy in 37 patients and a minor resection in 16. Associated procedures (including 5 two-stage hepatectomies and 3 pulmonary resections) were performed in 25 patients.
There was no operative mortality. Complications occurred in 14 patients. The cumulative 3- and 5-year survival rates were 54% and 40% (according to the type of lesions: ill-located, 75% and 48%; large, 62% and 62%; multinodular, 54% and 40%; extrahepatic, 43% and 14%). Hepatic recurrence (34 patients, 64%) was amenable to repeat surgery in 15 cases.
Liver resection may be achieved in some previously unresectable patients with the help of an effective chemotherapy. The benefit in survival seems comparable to that obtained with primary liver resection (40% at 5 years). This therapeutic strategy involves a multimodal approach, including repeat hepatectomies and extrahepatic surgery.
Studies have consistently confirmed the benefit of liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Few reports, however, have a long enough followup or sufficient 5-year survivors to study the clinical course of patients beyond 5 years.
From July 1985 through December 1991, 456 patients underwent liver resection for colorectal metastases. Ninety-six actual 5-year survivors (21%) were identified and their clinical course retrospectively reviewed.
Five-year survivors (n = 96) were more likely to have a Duke's B primary colorectal carcinoma, fewer than four metastatic lesions, unilobar disease, and a negative histologic margin when compared with patients not surviving 5 years (n = 298). Forty-four (46%) of the 96 five-year survivors had a recurrence after hepatectomy. Of these 44, 19 (43%) were rendered disease free after further treatment. Overall, 71 of the 96 five-year survivors were free of disease at last followup. The actuarial 10-year survival of this group was 78%.
Patients that are disease free 5 years after liver resection are likely to have been cured by liver resection. Patients should be aggressively followed for recurrence because of the potential for further treatment and longterm survival.
There is a need for clearly defined and widely applicable clinical criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Such criteria would also be useful for stratification of patients in clinical trials for this disease.
Clinical, pathologic, and outcome data for 1001 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between July 1985 and October 1998 were examined. These resections included 237 trisegmentectomies, 394 lobectomies, and 370 resections encompassing less than a lobe. The surgical mortality rate was 2.8%.
The 5-year survival rate was 37%, and the 10-year survival rate was 22%. Seven factors were found to be significant and independent predictors of poor long-term outcome by multivariate analysis: positive margin (p = 0.004), extrahepatic disease (p = 0.003), node-positive primary (p = 0.02), disease-free interval from primary to metastases <12 months (p = 0.03), number of hepatic tumors >1 (p = 0.0004), largest hepatic tumor >5 cm (p = 0.01), and carcinoembryonic antigen level >200 ng/ml (p = 0.01). When the last five of these criteria were used in a preoperative scoring system, assigning one point for each criterion, the total score was highly predictive of outcome (p < 0.0001). No patient with a score of 5 was a long-term survivor.
Resection of hepatic colorectal metastases may produce long-term survival and cure. Long-term outcome can be predicted from five criteria that are readily available for all patients considered for resection. Patients with up to two criteria can have a favorable outcome. Patients with three, four, or five criteria should be considered for experimental adjuvant trials. Studies of preoperative staging techniques or of adjuvant therapies should consider using such a score for stratification of patients.
Although resection is the sole chance of cure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, most patients are not candidates for surgery at the time of diagnosis. Strategies aiming at downstaging large or multifocal tumors to enable curative resection are appealing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant selective intra-arterial chemotherapy in noncirrhotic patients with unresectable HCC or metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver in the absence of extrahepatic disease.
Selective chemotherapy was provided by using a subcutaneous pump device via a catheter placed in the gastroduodenal artery. Chemotherapy regimen included floxuridine (0.2 mg/kg/day for 14 days) in each patient with additional boluses of cisplatin and doxorubicin on day 1 of each cycle in the presence of HCC. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for possible curative resection. Complete follow-up was available for each patient.
Twenty-eight patients with unresectable liver tumors (5 HCC and 23 metastatic colorectal cancer) were included in this study. There were no surgical complications related to pump insertion, and local chemotherapy was started within 1 week of surgery in each patient. The median follow-up in survivors was 31 months (range, 30 months to 5 years). Chemotherapy was well tolerated in 18 (64%) patients. Chemotherapy was discontinued in 4 patients because of abnormal liver function test results, and 2 of them required a biliary stent to relieve a biliary stricture. In 9 patients downstaging enabled curative resection (3 HCC, 6 colorectal metastasis). Seven of these patients were alive and tumor free at the completion of the study, with at least 2 years of follow-up. The actuarial survival rates at 3 years for HCC and colorectal metastases were 60% and 50%, respectively.
About one third of patients with unresectable liver tumors can be successfully treated by neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy followed by curative resection. This strategy appears particularly promising in patients with large HCC. This approach should be investigated further.
To assess the nature of changes in the field of hepatic resectional surgery and their impact on perioperative outcome.
Demographics, extent of resection, concomitant major procedures, operative and transfusion data, complications, and hospital stay were analyzed for 1,803 consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection from December 1991 to September 2001 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality and trends in operative and perioperative variables over the period of study were analyzed.
Malignant disease was the most common diagnosis (1,642 patients, 91%); of these cases, metastatic colorectal cancer accounted for 62% (n = 1,021). Three hundred seventy-five resections (21%) were performed for primary hepatic or biliary cancers and 161 (9%) for benign disease. Anatomical resections were performed in 1,568 patients (87%) and included 544 extended hepatectomies, 483 hepatectomies, and 526 segmental resections. Sixty-two percent of patients had three or more segments resected, 42% had bilobar resections, and 37% had concomitant additional major procedures. The median blood loss was 600 mL and 49% of patients were transfused at any time during the index admission. Median hospital stay was 8 days, morbidity was 45%, and operative mortality was 3.1%. Over the study period, there was a significant increase in the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections and a decrease in the number of hepatic segments resected. In parallel with this, there was a significant decline in blood loss, the use of blood products, and hospital stay. Despite an increase in concomitant major procedures, operative mortality decreased from approximately 4% in the first 5 years of the study to 1.3% in the last 2 years, with 0 operative deaths in the last 184 consecutive cases. On multivariate analysis, the number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only independent predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Over the past decade, the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections has increased significantly. The number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality, and reductions in both are largely responsible for the decrease in perioperative mortality, which has occurred despite an increase in concomitant major procedures.
The aim of this study was to observe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) on the resection rate and survival of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable hepatic metastases.
Forty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 1200 mg/m(2) as a continuous 48-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and response was assessed every 12 weeks (six cycles).
The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 47.5% (n = 19), with two complete responses and disease stabilization in 11 (27.5.%) patients. Responses were unconfirmed for 11 patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were typical of the chemotherapy agents used. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients reported hematological toxicity (35.0% grade 3/4) and 14 (35.0%) reported gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5% grade 3/4). Thirteen patients (32.5%) underwent potentially curative liver resection following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was particularly effective in patients with large metastases on entry to the study. The median time to progression is 14.3 months and, at a median follow-up of 19 months, all patients are alive.
Neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan combined with 5-FU/FA enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. The effects of treatment on survival have yet to be determined.
To evaluate the long-term survival of patients resected for primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downstaged by systemic chemotherapy and to use prognostic factors of outcome for a model predictive of survival on a preoperative setting.
Surgery of primarily unresectable CRLM after downstaging chemotherapy is still questioned, and prognostic factors of outcome are lacking.
From a consecutive series of 1439 patients with CRLM managed in a single institution during an 11-year period (1988-1999), 1104 (77%) initially unresectable (NR) patients were treated by chemotherapy and 335 (23%) resectable were treated by primary liver resection. Chemotherapy mainly consisted of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined to oxaliplatin (70%), irinotecan (7%), or both (4%) given as chronomodulated infusion (87%). NR patients were routinely reassessed every 4 courses. Surgery was reconsidered every time a documented response to chemotherapy was observed. Among 1104 NR patients, 138 "good responders" (12.5%) underwent secondary hepatic resection after an average of 10 courses of chemotherapy. At time of diagnosis, mean number of metastases was 4.4 (1-14) and mean maximum size was 5.2 cm (1-25). Extrahepatic tumor was present in 52 patients (38%). Multinodularity or extrahepatic tumor was the main cause of initial unresectability. All factors likely to be predictive of survival after liver resection were evaluated by uni- and multivariate analysis. Estimation of survival was adjusted on risk factors available preoperatively.
Seventy-five percent of procedures were major hepatectomies (> or =3 segments) and 93% were potentially curative. Liver surgery was combined to portal embolization, to ablative treatment, or to a second-stage hepatectomy in 42 patients (30%) and to resection of extrahepatic tumor in 41 patients (30%). Operative mortality within 2 months was 0.7%, and postoperative morbidity was 28%. After a mean follow-up of 48.7 months, 111 of the 138 patients (80%) developed tumor recurrence, 40 of which were hepatic (29%), 12 extrahepatic (9%), and 59 both hepatic and extrahepatic (43%). Recurrence was treated in 52 patients by repeat hepatectomy (71 procedures) and in 42 patients by extrahepatic resection (77 procedures). Survival was 33% and 23% at 5 and 10 years with a disease-free survival of 22% and 17%, respectively. It was decreased as compared with that of patients primarily resected within the same period (48% and 30% respectively, P = 0.01). At the last follow-up, 99 patients had died (72%) and 39 (28%) were alive; 25 were disease free (18%) and 14 had recurrence (10%). At multivariate analysis, 4 preoperative factors were independently associated to decreased survival: rectal primary, > or =3 metastases, maximum tumor size >10 cm, and CA 19-9 >100 UI/L. Mean adjusted 5-year survival according to the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 factors was 59%, 30%, 7%, 0%, and 0%.
Modern chemotherapy allows 12.5% of patients with unresectable CRLM to be rescued by liver surgery. Despite a high rate of recurrence, 5-year survival is 33% overall, with a wide use of repeat hepatectomies and extrahepatic resections. Four preoperative risk factors could select the patients most likely to benefit from this strategy.
Hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy is an important component in the treatment of patients with hepatic metastases. Successful use of a hepatic arterial infusion pump requires a low technical complication rate. We evaluated the complications and longterm durability of these devices at our institution.
Between April 1986 and March 2001, 544 patients underwent hepatic arterial infusion pump placement for treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Patient- and pump-related data were collected by chart review. Pump-related complications, duration of pump function, and overall patient survival were recorded.
Median patient survival was 24 months after pump placement. The incidences of pump failure were 9% at 1 year and 16% at 2 years. Pump complications occurred in 120 (22%) of the patients. Complications that occurred early after operation (< 30 days) were more likely to be salvaged than those occurring late (70% versus 30%, p < 0.001). Increased pump complication rates occurred in the setting of variant arterial anatomy (28% versus 19%, p = 0.02), when the catheter was inserted into a vessel other than the gastroduodenal artery (42% versus 21%, p = 0.004), if the pump was placed during the first half of the study period (1986 to 1993, 25% versus 1994 to 2001, 18%; p = 0.05), and if the surgeon had performed fewer than 25 earlier procedures (< 25, 31% versus > or = 25, 19%; p < 0.002).
In this large single institution experience, pump-related complications were low, the majority of early pump complications were salvaged, and pump complication rates improved as institutional experience accumulated. Longterm durability of pump function was excellent.
To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days.
The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), CPT-11 150 mg/m(2), and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg x 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), LV 400 mg/m(2), and FU 1,400 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection.
Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Hepatic metastases derive most of their blood supply from the hepatic artery; therefore, for patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy may improve outcome.
In a multi-institutional trial, 135 patients were randomly assigned to receive HAI versus systemic bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin. The primary end point was survival; secondary end points were response, recurrence, toxicity, quality of life, cost, and the influence of molecular markers.
Overall survival was significantly longer for HAI versus systemic treatment (median, 24.4 v 20 months; P = .0034), as were response rates (47% and 24%; P = .012) and time to hepatic progression (THP; 9.8 v 7.3 months; P = .034). Time to extrahepatic progression (7.7 v 14.8 months; P = .029) was significantly shorter in the HAI group. Quality-of-life measurements showed improved physical functioning in the HAI group at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Toxicity included grade > or = 3 neutropenia (2% and 45%; P < .01), stomatitis (0% and 24%; P < .01), and bilirubin elevation (18.6% and 0; P < .01) in the HAI and systemic treatment groups, respectively. A greater proportion of men versus women receiving HAI experienced biliary toxicity (37% and 15%, respectively; P = .05). For HAI patients with thymidylate synthase levels in tumor less than or > or = 4, the median survival was 24 and 14 months, respectively (P = .17).
HAI therapy increased overall survival, response rate, THP, and was associated with better physical functioning compared with systemic therapy. Additional studies need to address the overall benefit and cost of new chemotherapy agents versus HAI alone or the combination of HAI with new agents.