No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Abstract
The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is one of the important excitatory neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system, and its desensitization by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) plays an important role in neuron protection against receptor overstimulation. It is reported that GRK2 could down-regulate the mGluR5 signaling in both HEK 293 cells and neurons. However, whether GRK2-mediated mGluR5 desensitization is phosphorylation dependent remains controversial. Here, we demonstrated that the signal intensity and kinetics of mGluR5 desensitization was inhibited or changed by GRK2 in HEK 293 cells. By using the catalytically inactive GRK2 mutant K220R, and the receptor mutants that lack potential phosphorylation sites in the C-terminal tail, we demonstrated that the GRK2-mediated mGluR5 desensitization was phosphorylation-independent. Furthermore, overexpression of an N-terminal regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) homology (RH) domain of GRK2 was sufficient to attenuate the mGluR5 signaling, whereas the expression of GRK2 D110A mutant devoid in Gαq binding was unable to inhibit mGluR5 signaling. In summary, this study provides evidence that GRK2 mediates phosphorylationindependent mGluR5 desensitization via the interaction between the RGS domain and Gαq in HEK 293 cells.
... With respect to mGluRs, GRK2-mediated internalization has been the most studied. GRK2 binds and internalizes mGlu1 and mGlu5 [44][45][46], while having no direct effect on mGlu4 internalization [47]. Interestingly, the mechanism of GRK2-mediated internalization of mGlu5 differs based on the brain region. ...
... In cortical neurons that express high levels of GRK2, GRK2-mediated mGlu5 internalization is agonist-and phosphorylation-dependent, while in the striatal neurons, internalization is agonistand phosphorylation-independent [45]. The proposed mechanism for this non-canonical GRK2-assisted mGlu5 internalization requires a specific RGS homology domain for GRK2 [46]. Unlike GRK2, GRK4 has been shown to promote only phosphorylation-dependent internalization of group I mGluRs [39,48]. ...
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system that guides developmental and experience-dependent changes in many cellular substrates and brain circuits, through the process collectively referred to as neurobehavioral plasticity. Regulation of cell surface expression and membrane trafficking of glutamate receptors represents an important mechanism that assures optimal excitatory transmission, and at the same time, also allows for fine-tuning neuronal responses to glutamate. On the other hand, there is growing evidence implicating dysregulated glutamate receptor trafficking in the pathophysiology of several neuropsychiatric disorders. This review provides up-to-date information on the molecular determinants regulating trafficking and surface expression of metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors in the rodent and human brain and discusses the role of mGluR trafficking in maladaptive synaptic plasticity produced by addictive drugs. As substantial evidence links glutamatergic dysfunction to the progression and the severity of drug addiction, advances in our understanding of mGluR trafficking may provide opportunities for the development of novel pharmacotherapies of addiction and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
... Similarly mGluR4 was shown to desensitize or internalize through a PKC-dependent mechanism but not through GRKs (Mathiesen and Ramirez 2006). GRK2 was also shown to contribute to the phosphorylation and desensitization of both mGluR1 and mGluR5 in HEK cells, but paradoxically, more recent studies have shown that mGluR5 desensitization by GRK2 was phosphorylation-independent in HEK cells and neurons (Ribeiro et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2013). With respect to mGluR5, both PKA (Protein Kinase A) and PKC were shown to phosphorylate mGluR5, influencing the cellular internalization of the receptor upon prolonged (30 min) exposure to the agonist DHPG (Lee et al. 2008;Uematsu et al. 2015). ...
A critical role has been assigned to protein kinase C (PKC)ε in the control of intracellular calcium oscillations triggered upon activation of type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR5) in cultured astrocytes. Nevertheless, the physiological significance of this particular signalling profile in the response of astrocytes to glutamate remains largely unknown. Considering that kinases are frequently involved in the regulation of G protein‐coupled receptors, we have examined a putative link between the nature of the calcium signals and the response regulation upon repeated exposures of astrocytes to the agonist (S)‐3,5‐dihydroxyphenylglycine. We show that upon repeated mGluR5 activations, a robust desensitization was observed in astrocytes grown in culture conditions favouring the peak‐plateau‐type response. At variance, in cell cultures where calcium oscillations were predominating, the response was fully preserved even during repeated challenges with the agonist. Pharmacological inhibition of PKCε or genetic suppression of this isoform using shRNA was found to convert an oscillatory calcium profile to a sustained calcium mobilization and this latter profile was subject to desensitization upon repetitive mGluR5 activation. Our results suggest a yet undocumented scheme in which the activity of PKCε contributes to preserve the receptor sensitivity upon repeated or sustained activations.
Cover Image for this issue: doi: 10.1111/jnc.13797.
The uncoupling of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) from heterotrimeric G proteins represents an essential feedback mechanism that protects neurons against receptor overstimulation that may ultimately result in damage. The desensitization of mGluR signaling is mediated by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Unlike mGluR1, the attenuation of mGluR5 signaling in HEK 293 cells is reported to be mediated by a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism. However, the mechanisms regulating mGluR5 signaling and endocytosis in neurons have not been investigated. Here we show that a 2-fold overexpression of GRK2 leads to the attenuation of endogenous mGluR5-mediated inositol phosphate (InsP) formation in striatal neurons and siRNA knockdown of GRK2 expression leads to enhanced mGluR5-mediated InsP formation. Expression of a catalytically inactive GRK2-K220R mutant also effectively attenuates mGluR5 signaling, but the expression of a GRK2-D110A mutant devoid in Galpha(q/11) binding increases mGluR5 signaling in response to agonist stimulation. Taken together, these results indicate that the attenuation of mGluR5 responses in striatal neurons is phosphorylation-independent. In addition, we find that mGluR5 does not internalize in response to agonist treatment in striatal neuron, but is efficiently internalized in cortical neurons that have higher levels of endogenous GRK2 protein expression. When overexpressed in striatal neurons, GRK2 promotes agonist-stimulated mGluR5 internalization. Moreover, GRK2-mediated promotion of mGluR5 endocytosis does not require GRK2 catalytic activity. Thus, we provide evidence that GRK2 mediates phosphorylation-independent mGluR5 desensitization and internalization in neurons.
The beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK) specifically phosphorylates the activated form of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR) and related G protein-coupled receptors. To further elucidate the role of beta ARK in receptor desensitization, we generated a beta ARK dominant negative mutant by converting an invariant lysine residue in the protein kinase catalytic domain to an arginine. Expressed and purified beta ARK-K220R was able to inhibit wild type beta ARK phosphorylation of the beta 2AR in vitro. When stably transfected into human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells, beta ARK-K220R promoted a > 2-fold increase in beta-agonist-stimulated cAMP production without affecting beta 2AR sequestration. In contrast, beta ARK-K220R had no effect on the desensitization of the prostaglandin E2 receptor response in BEAS-2B cells. These findings directly demonstrate a role for beta ARK in desensitization of the beta 2AR in intact cells and establish the potential utility of using dominant negative mutants to elucidate the substrate specificity of G protein-coupled receptor kinases.
In the mid to late 1980s, studies were published that provided the first evidence for the existence of glutamate receptors that are not ligand-gated cation channels but are coupled to effector systems through GTP-binding proteins. Since those initial reports, tremendous progress has been made in characterizing these metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), including cloning and characterization of cDNA that encodes a family of eight mGluR subtypes, several of which have multiple splice variants. Also, tremendous progress has been made in developing new highly selective mGluR agonists and antagonists and toward determining the physiologic roles of the mGluRs in mammalian brain. These findings have exciting implications for drug development and suggest that the mGluRs provide a novel target for development of therepeutic agents that could have a significant impact on neuropharmacology.
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein α subunits. Interestingly, a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate AlF4/--dependent binding to G protein α subunits, we tested the ability of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns in the absence or presence of AlF4/-. This revealed the specific ability of bovine brain Gα(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF4/--dependent manner. In contrast, Gα(s), Gα(i), and Gα(12/13) did not bind to GRK2 or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that bovine brain G2a(q11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2, while no binding of Gα(q/11), Gα(s), Gα(i), or Gα(12/13) to comparable constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Gα(q) revealed significant binding of both Gα(q) GDP/AlF4/- and Gα(q)(GTPγS), but not Gα(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively active Gα(q)(R183C) but not wild type Gα(q). In vitro analysis revealed that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Gα(q) that is dependent on the presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited Gα(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-β both in vitro and in cells, possibly through sequestration of activated Gα(q). These data suggest that a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins.
G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are involved in the regulation of many G-protein-coupled receptors. As opposed to the other GRKs, such as rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) or beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK, GRK2), no receptor substrate for GRK4 has been so far identified. Here we show that GRK4 is expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells, where it regulates mGlu(1) metabotropic glutamate receptors, as indicated by the following: 1) When coexpressed in heterologous cells (HEK293), mGlu(1) receptor signaling was desensitized by GRK4 in an agonist-dependent manner (homologous desensitization). 2) In transfected HEK293 and in cultured Purkinje cells, the exposure to glutamate agonists induced internalization of the receptor and redistribution of GRK4. There was a substantial colocalization of the receptor and kinase both under basal condition and after internalization. 3) Kinase activity was necessary for desensitizing mGlu(1a) receptor and agonist-dependent phosphorylation of this receptor was also documented. 4) Antisense treatment of cultured Purkinje cells, which significantly reduced the levels of GRK4 expression, induced a marked modification of the mGlu(1)-mediated functional response, consistent with an impaired receptor desensitization. The critical role for GRK4 in regulating mGlu(1) receptors implicates a major involvement of this kinase in the physiology of Purkinje cell and in motor learning.
The role of metabotropic l-glutamate (mGlu) receptors in supralinear Ca(2+) signaling was investigated in cultured hippocampal cells using Ca(2+) imaging techniques and whole-cell voltage-clamp recording. In neurons, but not glia, global supralinear Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores was observed when the mGlu receptor agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) was combined with elevated extracellular K(+) levels (10.8 mm), moderate depolarization (15-30 mV), or NMDA (3 micrometer). There was a delay (2-8 min) before the stores were fully charged, and the enhancement persisted for a short period (up to 10 min) after removal of the store-loading stimulus. Studies with the mGlu receptor antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine demonstrated that these effects were mediated by activation of the mGlu(5) receptor subtype. The L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel antagonist nifedipine (10 micrometer) substantially reduced responses to DHPG obtained in the presence of elevated extracellular K(+) but not NMDA. This suggests that the Ca(2+) that is required to load the stores can enter either through L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels or directly through NMDA receptors. The findings that both depolarization and NMDA receptor activation can facilitate mGlu receptor Ca(2+) signaling adds considerable flexibility to the processes that underlie activity-dependent changes in synaptic strength. In particular, a temporal separation between the store-loading stimulus and the activation of mGlu receptors could be used as a recency detector in neurons.
The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR), mGluR1a and mGluR5a, are G protein-coupled receptors that couple via Gq to the hydrolysis of phosphoinositides, the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, and the activation of protein kinase C (PKC). We show here that mGluR1/5 activation results in
oscillatory G protein coupling to phospholipase C thereby stimulating oscillations in both inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate formation
and intracellular Ca2+ concentrations. The mGluR1/5-stimulated Ca2+ oscillations are translated into the synchronized repetitive redistribution of PKCβII between the cytosol and plasma membrane.
The frequency at which mGluR1a and mGluR5a subtypes stimulate inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate, Ca2+, and PKCβII oscillations is regulated by the charge of a single amino acid residue localized within their G protein-coupling
domains. However, oscillatory mGluR signaling does not involve the repetitive feedback phosphorylation and desensitization
of mGluR activity, since mutation of the putative PKC consensus sites within the first and second intracellular loops as well
as the carboxyl-terminal tail does not prevent mGluR1a-stimulated PKCβII oscillations. Furthermore, oscillations in Ca2+ continued in the presence of PKC inhibitors, which blocked PKCβII redistribution from the plasma membrane back into the cytosol.
We conclude that oscillatory mGluR signaling represents an intrinsic receptor/G protein coupling property that does not involve
PKC feedback phosphorylation.
The accepted paradigm for G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-mediated desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors involves GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation followed by the binding of arrestin proteins. Although GRKs contribute to metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) inactivation, beta-arrestins do not appear to be required for mGluR1 G protein uncoupling. Therefore, we investigated whether the phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues localized within the C terminus of mGluR1a is sufficient to allow GRK2-mediated attenuation of mGluR1a signaling. We find that the truncation of the mGluR1a C-terminal tail prevents mGluR1a phosphorylation and that GRK2 does not contribute to the phosphorylation of an mGluR1 splice variant (mGluR1b). However, mGluR1a-866Delta- and mGluR1b-stimulated inositol phosphate formation is attenuated following GRK2 expression. The expression of the GRK2 C-terminal domain to block membrane translocation of endogenous GRK2 increases mGluR1a-866Delta- and mGluR1b-stimulated inositol phosphate formation, presumably by blocking membrane translocation of GRK2. In contrast, expression of the kinase-deficient GRK2-K220R mutant inhibits inositol phosphate formation by these unphosphorylated receptors. Expression of the GRK2 N-terminal domain (residues 45-185) also attenuates both constitutive and agonist-stimulated mGluR1a, mGluR1a-866Delta, and mGluR1b signaling, and the GRK2 N terminus co-precipitates with mGluR1a. Taken together, our observations indicate that attenuation of mGluR1 signaling by GRK2 is phosphorylation-independent and that the interaction of the N-terminal domain of GRK2 with mGluR1 contributes to the regulation of mGluR1 G protein coupling.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce cellular signals from hormones, neurotransmitters, light, and odorants by activating heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins. For many GPCRs, short term regulation is initiated by agonist-dependent phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs), such as GRK2, resulting in G protein/receptor uncoupling. GRK2 also regulates signaling by binding G alpha(q/ll) and inhibiting G alpha(q) stimulation of the effector phospholipase C beta. The binding site for G alpha(q/ll) resides within the amino-terminal domain of GRK2, which is homologous to the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins. To map the Galpha(q/ll) binding site on GRK2, we carried out site-directed mutagenesis of the RGS homology (RH) domain and identified eight residues, which when mutated, alter binding to G alpha(q/ll). These mutations do not alter the ability of full-length GRK2 to phosphorylate rhodopsin, an activity that also requires the amino-terminal domain. Mutations causing G alpha(q/ll) binding defects impair recruitment to the plasma membrane by activated G alpha(q) and regulation of G alpha(q)-stimulated phospholipase C beta activity when introduced into full-length GRK2. Two different protein interaction sites have previously been identified on RH domains. The G alpha binding sites on RGS4 and RGS9, called the "A" site, is localized to the loops between helices alpha 3 and alpha 4, alpha 5 and alpha 6, and alpha 7 and alpha 8. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) binding site of axin involves residues on alpha helices 3, 4, and 5 (the "B" site) of its RH domain. We demonstrate that the G alpha(q/ll) binding site on the GRK2 RH domain is distinct from the "A" and "B" sites and maps primarily to the COOH terminus of its alpha 5 helix. We suggest that this novel protein interaction site on an RH domain be designated the "C" site.
Agonist-promoted desensitization of the heterodimeric metabotropic GABA(B) receptor was investigated. Whereas no desensitization was observed in HEK293 cells heterologously expressing the receptor, GABA and the synthetic agonist baclofen induced a robust desensitization in cerebellar granule cells endogenously expressing the receptor. Taking advantage of this cell-specific desensitization phenotype, we identified GRK4 as the kinase involved in the neuronal desensitization. Transfection of small interference RNA directed against GRK4 significantly reduced GRK4 levels in cerebellar granule cells and strongly inhibited the agonist-promoted desensitization. Reciprocally, transfection of GRK4 in HEK293 cells restored agonist-promoted desensitization, confirming that this kinase is sufficient to support desensitization. Surprisingly, this desensitization occurred in the absence of ligand-induced receptor phosphorylation and could be promoted by GRK4 mutants deleted of their kinase domain. Taken together, these results suggest that GRK4 plays a central role in the agonist-promoted desensitization of GABA(B) receptor and that it does so through an atypical mechanism that challenges the generally accepted model linking the kinase activity of GRKs to their role in receptor desensitization.
Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are cytosolic proteins that contribute
to the adaptation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. The canonical model for GRK-dependent receptor desensitization
involves GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation to promote the binding of arrestin proteins that sterically block receptor
coupling to G proteins. However, GRK-mediated desensitization, in the absence of phosphorylation and arrestin binding, has
been reported for metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) and γ-aminobutyric acid B receptors. Here we show that GRK2 mutants
impaired in Gαq/11 binding (R106A, D110A, and M114A), bind effectively to mGluR1a, but do not mediate mGluR1a adaptation. Gαq/11 is immunoprecipitated as a complex with mGluR1a in the absence of agonist, and either agonist treatment or GRK2 overexpression
promotes the dissociation of the receptor/Gαq/11 complex. However, these mGluR1a/Gαq/11 interactions are not antagonized by the overexpression of either GRK2 mutants defective in Gαq/11 binding or RGS4. We have also identified a GRK2-D527A mutant that binds Gαq/11 in an -dependent manner but is unable to either bind mGluR1a or attenuate mGluR1a signaling. We conclude that the mechanism underlying
GRK2 phosphorylation-independent attenuation of mGluR1a signaling is RH domain-dependent, requiring the binding of GRK2 to
both Gαq/11 and mGluR1a. This serves to coordinate GRK2 interactions with Gαq/11 and to disrupt receptor/Gαq/11 complexes. Our findings indicate that GRK2 regulates receptor/G protein interactions, in addition to its traditional role
as a receptor kinase.
Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) transmit signals from membrane bound G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to intracellular effector proteins. The G(q) subfamily of Galpha subunits couples GPCR activation to the enzymatic activity of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta). Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to activated Galpha subunits, including Galpha(q), and regulate Galpha signaling by acting as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), increasing the rate of the intrinsic GTPase activity, or by acting as effector antagonists for Galpha subunits. GPCR kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-bound receptors in the first step of receptor desensitization. The amino termini of all GRKs contain an RGS homology (RH) domain, and binding of the GRK2 RH domain to Galpha(q) attenuates PLC-beta activity. The RH domain of GRK2 interacts with Galpha(q/11) through a novel Galpha binding surface termed the "C" site. Here, molecular modeling of the Galpha(q).GRK2 complex and site-directed mutagenesis of Galpha(q) were used to identify residues in Galpha(q) that interact with GRK2. The model identifies Pro(185) in Switch I of Galpha(q) as being at the crux of the interface, and mutation of this residue to lysine disrupts Galpha(q) binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Switch III also appears to play a role in GRK2 binding because the mutations Galpha(q)-V240A, Galpha(q)-D243A, both residues within Switch III, and Galpha(q)-Q152A, a residue that structurally supports Switch III, are defective in binding GRK2. Furthermore, GRK2-mediated inhibition of Galpha(q)-Q152A-R183C-stimulated inositol phosphate release is reduced in comparison to Galpha(q)-R183C. Interestingly, the model also predicts that residues in the helical domain of Galpha(q) interact with GRK2. In fact, the mutants Galpha(q)-K77A, Galpha(q)-L78D, Galpha(q)-Q81A, and Galpha(q)-R92A have reduced binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Finally, although the mutant Galpha(q)-T187K has greatly reduced binding to RGS2 and RGS4, it has little to no effect on binding to GRK2. Thus the RH domain A and C sites for Galpha(q) interaction rely on contacts with distinct regions and different Switch I residues in Galpha(q).
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are members of a unique class of G protein-coupled receptors (class III) that include
the calcium-sensing and γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors. The activity of mGluRs is regulated by second messenger-dependent
protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). The attenuation of both mGluR1a and mGluR1b signaling by GRK2
is phosphorylation- and β-arrestin-independent and requires the concomitant association of GRK2 with both the receptor and
Gαq/11. G protein interactions are mediated, in part, by the mGluR1 intracellular second loop, but the domains required for GRK2
binding are unknown. In the present study, we showed that GRK2 binds to the second intracellular loop of mGluR1a and mGluR1b
and also to the mGluR1a carboxyl-terminal tail. Alanine scanning mutagenesis revealed a discrete domain within loop 2 that
contributes to GRK2 binding, and the mutation of either lysine 691 or 692 to an alanine within this domain resulted in a loss
of GRK2 binding to both mGluR1a and mGluR1b. Mutation of either Lys691 or Lys692 prevented GRK2-mediated attenuation of mGluR1b signaling, whereas the mutation of only Lys692 prevented GRK2-mediated inhibition of mGluR1a signaling. Thus, the mGluR1a carboxyl-terminal tail may also be involved in
regulating the signaling of the mGluR1a splice variant. Taken together, our findings indicated that kinase binding to an mGluR1
domain involved in G protein-coupling is essential for the phosphorylation-independent attenuation of signaling by GRK2.
The G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylates and desensitizes ligand-activated G protein-coupled-receptors. Here, evidence is shown for a novel role of GRK2 in regulating chemokine-mediated signals. The presence of increased levels of GRK2 in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells produced a significant reduction of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) response to CCL2. This effect is independent of its role in receptor phosphorylation because the kinase-deficient mutant GRK2K220R was able to reduce this response, and ERK activation by CCR2BIX, a phosphorylation-defective receptor mutant, was also inhibited by GRK2. Constructs containing the Galpha(q)-binding RGS-like RH domain of GRK2 or its Gbetagamma-binding domain could not reproduce the inhibition, thus revealing that GRK2 acts downstream of G proteins. Interestingly, chemokine-driven mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) stimulation is not affected in cells overexpressing GRK2 or GRK2K220R or in splenocytes from heterozygous GRK2 mice, where reduced kinase levels correlate with enhanced ERK activation by chemokines. We find GRK2 and MEK in the same multimolecular complex, thus suggesting a mechanism for GRK2 regulation of ERK activity that involves a direct or coordinate interaction with MEK. These results suggest an important role for GRK2 in the control of chemokine induction of ERK activation at the level of the MEK-ERK interface.
Many membrane receptors are made of a ligand binding domain and an effector domain mediating intracellular signaling. This
is the case for the metabotropic glutamate-like G-protein-coupled receptors. How ligand binding leads to the active conformation
of the effector domain in such receptors is largely unknown. Here, we used an evolutionary trace analysis and mutagenesis
to identify critical residues involved in the allosteric coupling between the Venus flytrap ligand binding domain (VFT) and
the heptahelical G-protein activating domain of the metabotropic glutamate-like receptors. We have shown that a conserved
interdomain disulfide bridge is required for this allosteric interaction. Taking into account that these receptors are homodimers,
this finding provides important new information explaining how the different conformations of the dimer of VFT lead to different
signaling of such dimeric receptors.
Receptor desensitization progressively limits responsiveness of cells to chronically applied stimuli. Desensitization in the continuous presence of agonist has been difficult to study with available assay methods. Here, we used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based live cell assay for the second messenger diacylglycerol to measure desensitization of a model seven-transmembrane receptor, the Gq-coupled angiotensin II type 1(A) receptor, expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. In response to angiotensin II, we observed a transient diacylglycerol response reflecting activation and complete desensitization of the receptor within 2-5 min. By utilizing a variety of approaches including graded tetracycline-inducible receptor expression, mutated receptors, and overexpression or short interfering RNA-mediated silencing of putative components of the cellular desensitization machinery, we conclude that the rate and extent of receptor desensitization are critically determined by the following: receptor concentration in the plasma membrane; the presence of phosphorylation sites on the carboxyl terminus of the receptor; kinase activity of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, but not of G protein-coupled receptor kinases 3, 5, or 6; and stoichiometric expression of beta-arrestin. The findings introduce the use of the biosensor diacylglycerol reporter as a powerful means for studying Gq-coupled receptor desensitization and document that, at the levels of receptor overexpression commonly used in such studies, the properties of the desensitization process are markedly perturbed and do not reflect normal cellular physiology.
The G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activated by the neurotransmitter GABA is made up of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). GABA(B1) binds agonists, whereas GABA(B2) is required for trafficking GABA(B1) to the cell surface, increasing agonist affinity to GABA(B1), and activating associated G proteins. These subunits each comprise two domains, a Venus flytrap domain (VFT) and a heptahelical transmembrane domain (7TM). How agonist binding to the GABA(B1) VFT leads to GABA(B2) 7TM activation remains unknown. Here, we used a glycan wedge scanning approach to investigate how the GABA(B) VFT dimer controls receptor activity. We first identified the dimerization interface using a bioinformatics approach and then showed that introducing an N-glycan at this interface prevents the association of the two subunits and abolishes all activities of GABA(B2), including agonist activation of the G protein. We also identified a second region in the VFT where insertion of an N-glycan does not prevent dimerization, but blocks agonist activation of the receptor. These data provide new insight into the function of this prototypical GPCR and demonstrate that a change in the dimerization interface is required for receptor activation.
In a previous study we reported that the addition of a carboxylic group to the mGlu receptor agonist aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate (ACPD) changes its properties from agonist to antagonist at both mGlu1 and mGlu2 receptors, and resulted in an increase in affinity at mGlu4 receptors, with isomers being either agonists or antagonists. In the present study, the effect of gamma-carboxy-L-glutamic acid (Gla) and (2S,2'R,3'R)-2-(2,3-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine (DCG-IV), two carboxylic derivatives of non-selective agonists, were examined on all cloned mGlu receptors. We found that this additional carboxylic group on glutamate prevents its interaction with group-I mGlu receptors and generates a potent group-II antagonist (K(B) = 55 microM on mGlu2). At group-III mGlu receptors, Gla was found to be either an antagonist (mGlu7 and mGlu8 receptors) or a partial agonist (mGlu4 and mGlu6 receptors). We show here that L-CCG-I is a general mGlu receptor agonist activating all cloned receptors. We also confirm that DCG-IV, which corresponds to L-CCG-I with an additional carboxylic group, is a selective group-II agonist. However, this additional COOH group changes the properties of L-CCG-I from an agonist to an antagonist at all group-III receptors, making this compound one of the most potent group-III mGlu receptor antagonist known so far. These observations will be useful for the development of more potent and selective mGlu receptor agonists and antagonists.
G-protein-mediated signaling is the most widely used signaling mechanism in cells and its regulation is crucial for various physiological functions. G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are involved in the desensitization of GPCR signals. Recently, the X-ray crystal structure of GRK2 complexed with Gβγ was demonstrated and revealed the intimate association of three important signaling modules with Gβγ to regulate GRK2 activity.
The intrinsic properties of neurons that enable them to maintain depolarized, persistently activated states in the absence of sustained input are poorly understood. In short-term memory tasks, individual prefrontal cortical (PFC) neurons can maintain persistent action potential output during delay periods between informative cues and behavioral responses. Dopamine and drugs of abuse alter PFC function and working memory, possibly by modulating intrinsic neuronal properties. Here we used patch-clamp recording of layer 5 PFC pyramidal neurons to identify a postsynaptic depolarization that was evoked by action potential bursts and mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5). This depolarization occurred in the absence of recurrent synaptic activity and was reduced by a dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) protein kinase A pathway. After behavioral sensitization to cocaine, the depolarization was substantially diminished and D1R modulation was lost. We propose that burst-evoked intrinsic depolarization is a form of short-term cellular memory that is modulated by dopamine and cocaine experience.
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) serve important neuromodulatory roles at glutamatergic synapses to shape excitatory neurotransmission. Recent evidence indicates that the desensitization of mGluRs is an important determinant in regulating the functions of these receptors. The present results demonstrate that G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), which are known to regulate the desensitization of many G protein-coupled receptors, regulate both the expression and function of mGluR5 in a heterologous expression system. This regulatory event is limited to members of the GRK2 family since GRK4 family members do not elicit the same effects on mGluR5. Kinase activity is shown to be required for GRK-mediated regulation of mGluR5. Furthermore, the ability of GRK2 to regulate mGluR5 is dependent, at least in part, on the presence of threonine 840 in the carboxyl terminus of mGluR5. These studies identify novel roles for GRKs in regulating mGluR5 that may serve to further shape the function of these receptors in neurotransmission.
G-protein-mediated signaling is the most widely used signaling mechanism in cells and its regulation is crucial for various physiological functions. G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are involved in the desensitization of GPCR signals. Recently, the X-ray crystal structure of GRK2 complexed with G beta gamma was demonstrated and revealed the intimate association of three important signaling modules with G beta gamma to regulate GRK2 activity.
In this study we characterized the heterologous desensitization and internalization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) splice variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b following activation of endogenous G(q/11)-coupled receptors in HEK293 cells. Agonist activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine or P2Y1 purinergic receptors triggered the PKC- and CaMKII-dependent internalization of mGluR1a. In co-immunoprecipitation studies, both glutamate and carbachol increased the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. Co-addition of the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor GF109203X and the Ca(2+) calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) inhibitor KN-93 blocked the ability of glutamate and carbachol to increase the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. Glutamate also increased the association of GRK2 with mGluR1b, whereas carbachol did not. However, unlike mGluR1a, glutamate-stimulated association of GRK2 with mGluR1b was not reduced by PKC/CaMKII inhibition. Pretreatment of cells expressing mGluR1a or mGluR1b with carbachol rapidly desensitized subsequent glutamate-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation. The carbachol-induced heterologous desensitization and internalization of mGluR1a was blocked by LY367385, an mGluR1a antagonist with inverse agonist activity. Furthermore, LY367385 blocked the ability of carbachol to increase the association of GRK2 with mGluR1a. On the other hand, LY367385 had no effect on the carbachol-induced desensitization and internalization of the nonconstitutively active mGluR1b splice variant. These results demonstrate that the internalization of mGluR1a, triggered homologously by glutamate or heterologously by carbachol, is PKC/CaMKII-, GRK2-, arrestin-, and clathrin-dependent and that PKC/CaMKII activation appears to be necessary for GRK2 to associate with mGluR1a. Furthermore, the heterologous desensitization of mGluR1a is dependent upon the splice variant being in an active conformation.
Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) comprise a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that can be classified into 3 groups based on G protein coupling specificity and sequence similarity. Group I mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) are coupled to the heterotrimeric G protein Galpha(q/11) and trigger the release of calcium from intracellular stores. In the present review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms involved in the desensitization and endocytosis of group I mGluRs. Group I mGluRs desensitize in response to both second-messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK). However, GRK2-mediated mGluR1 desensitization appears to be both phosphorylation- and beta-arrestin-independent. In addition to GRK-mediated uncoupling of mGluRs from heterotrimeric G proteins, the huntingtin-interacting protein, optineurin, also contributes to mGluR1 and mGluR5 desensitization. The G protein-uncoupling activity of optineurin appears to be facilitated by the presence of polyglutamine-expanded mutant huntingtin but not wild-type huntingtin. Group I mGluRs also undergo both agonist-dependent and -independent endocytosis in both heterologous cell expression systems and primary neuronal cultures. The present review overviews the current understanding of the contribution of second messenger-dependent protein kinases, beta-arrestins and a novel Ral/phospholipase D2 (PLD2)-mediated endocytic pathway to the regulation of Group I mGluR endocytosis. Overall, the regulation of Group I mGluR desensitization and endocytosis appears to be mediated by the same molecular intermediates as have been described for more typical GPCR such as the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. However, there appears to be subtle, but important, differences in the mechanisms by which these intermediates are employed to regulate Group I mGluR desensitization and endocytosis.
We investigated the role of G protein coupled-receptor kinases (GRKs) in the desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-mediated signaling using Xenopus oocytes and baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Baclofen elicited inward K(+) currents in oocytes coexpressing heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor, GABA(B1a) subunit (GB(1a)R) and GABA(B2) subunit (GB(2)R), together with G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRKs), in a concentration-dependent manner. Repetitive application of baclofen to oocytes coexpressing GABA(B)R and GIRKs did not change peak K(+) currents in the first and second responses, but the latter responses were significantly attenuated by coexpression of either GRK4 or GRK5 with attenuation efficacy of GRK4 > GRK5. Coexpression of other GRKs including GRK2, GRK3, and GRK6 had no effect on GABA(B) receptor-mediated desensitization processes. In BHK cells coexpressing GRK4 fused to Venus (brighter variant of yellow fluorescent protein, GRK4-Venus) with GB(1a)R and GB(2)R, GRK4-Venus was expressed in the cytosol but was translocated to the plasma membranes by GABA(B)R activation. In BHK cells coexpressing GRK4 fused to Cerulean (brighter variant of cyan fluorescent protein, GRK4-Cerulean) with GB(1a)R and GB(2)R-Venus, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis demonstrated that GRK4-Cerulean formed a protein complex with GB(2)R-Venus. Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis confirmed GB(2)R-GRK4 complex formation. GRK5 also formed a complex with GB(2)R on the plasma membranes as determined by FRET and Western blotting but not GRK2, GRK3, and GRK6. Our results indicate that GRK4 and GRK5 desensitize GABA(B) receptor-mediated responses by forming protein complexes with GB(2)R subunit of GABA(B)R at the plasma membranes.
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and arrestins are key participants in the canonical pathways leading to phosphorylation-dependent GPCR desensitization, endocytosis, intracellular trafficking and resensitization as well as in the modulation of important intracellular signaling cascades by GPCR. Novel studies have revealed a phosphorylation-independent desensitization mechanism operating through their RGS-homology (RH) domain and the recent determination of the crystal structures of GRK2 and GRK6 has uncovered interesting details on the structure-function relationships of these kinases. Emerging evidence indicates that the activity of GRKs is tightly modulated by mechanisms including phosphorylation by different kinases and interaction with several cellular proteins such as calmodulin, caveolin or RKIP. In addition, GRKs are involved in multiple interactions with non-receptor proteins (PI3K, Akt, GIT or MEK) that point to novel GRK cellular roles. In this article, our purpose is to describe the ever increasing map of functional interactions for GRK proteins as a basis to better understand its contribution to cellular processes.
The widely accepted model of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation describes a system where the agonist-activated receptors couple to G proteins to induce a cellular response, and are subsequently phosphorylated by a family of kinases called the G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). The GRK-phosphorylated receptor then acts as a substrate for the binding of a family of proteins called arrestins, which uncouple the receptor and G protein so desensitizing the agonist-induced response. Other kinases, principally the second messenger-dependent protein kinases, are also known to play a role in the desensitization of many GPCR responses. It is now clear that there are subtle and complex interactions between GRKs and second messenger-dependent protein kinases in the regulation of GPCR function. Functional selectivity describes the ability of agonists to stabilize different active conformations of the same GPCR. With regard to desensitization, distinct agonist-activated conformations of a GPCR could undergo different molecular mechanisms of desensitization. An example of this is the μ opioid receptor (MOPr), where the agonists morphine and [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO) induce desensitization of the MOPr by different mechanisms, largely protein kinase C (PKC)- or GRK-dependent, respectively. This can be best explained by supposing that these two agonists stabilize distinct conformations of the MOPr, which are nevertheless able to couple to the relevant G-proteins and produce similar responses, yet are sufficiently different to trigger different regulatory processes. There is evidence that other GPCRs also undergo agonist-selective desensitization, but the full therapeutic consequences of this phenomenon await further detailed study.
British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 153, S379–S388; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707604; published online 3 December 2007
Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR5 subtypes) are densely expressed in mammalian brain. They are actively involved in the regulation of normal cellular activity and synaptic plasticity, and are frequently linked to the pathogenesis of various mental illnesses. Like ionotropic glutamate receptors, group I mGluRs are subject to the regulation by protein phosphorylation. Accumulative data demonstrate sufficient phosphorylation of the intracellular mGluR1/5 domains at specific serine/threonine sites by protein kinase C in heterologous cells or neurons, which serves as an important mechanism for regulating the receptor signaling and desensitization. Emerging evidence also shows the significant involvements of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, tyrosine kinases, and protein phosphatases in controlling the phosphorylation status of group I mGluRs. This review analyzes the recent data concerning group I mGluR phosphorylation and the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of group I mGluR function. Future research directions in this area with newly available high throughput and proteomic approaches are also discussed in the end.
Role of Ca2+ stores in metabotropic L-glutamate receptor-mediated supralinear Ca2+ signaling in rat hippocampal neurons
- M G Rae
- D J Martin
- G L Collingridge
- MG Rae