Deriving Competencies for Mentors of Clinical and Translational Scholars

Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Clinical and Translational Science (Impact Factor: 2.11). 06/2012; 5(3):273-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00366.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the importance of research mentorship has been well established, the role of mentors of junior clinical and translational science investigators is not clearly defined. The authors attempt to derive a list of actionable competencies for mentors from a series of complementary methods. We examined focus groups, the literature, competencies derived for clinical and translational scholars, mentor training curricula, mentor evaluation forms and finally conducted an expert panel process in order to compose this list. These efforts resulted in a set of competencies that include generic competencies expected of all mentors, competencies specific to scientists, and competencies that are clinical and translational research specific. They are divided into six thematic areas: (1) Communication and managing the relationship, (2) Psychosocial support, (3) Career and professional development, (4) Professional enculturation and scientific integrity, (5) Research development, and (6) Clinical and translational investigator development. For each thematic area, we have listed associated competencies, 19 in total. For each competency, we list examples that are actionable and measurable. Although a comprehensive approach was used to derive this list of competencies, further work will be required to parse out how to apply and adapt them, as well future research directions and evaluation processes.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Approaches to training biomedical scientists have created a talented research community. However, they have failed to create a professional workforce that includes many racial and ethnic minorities and women in proportion to their representation in the population or in PhD training. This is particularly true at the faculty level. Explanations for the absence of diversity in faculty ranks can be found in social science theories that reveal processes by which individuals develop identities, experiences and skills required to be seen as legitimate within the profession.
    BMC Medical Education 08/2014; 14(1):160. DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-160 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeTo identify and disseminate the organizational characteristics of “top performing” National Institute of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) institutions in regards to career development, using the number of new K awards received per year to rank institutions and comparing these with non-CTSA institutions.Methods The authors analyzed the organizational characteristics of all 61 CTSA institutions from 2006 to 2013 using the American Association of Medical Colleges Organizational Characteristics Database and K Award funding details using NIH RePORT.ResultsFive of the “top 10 performing” institutions are in the western region, and six out of the ten are public schools. Three of the “top 10 performing” institutions receive most of their K awards through two funding mechanisms—the K08 (mentored clinical scientist research award) and K23 (mentored patient-oriented research career development awards). Notably, these three institutions lack a KL2 program.Conclusion The CTSA network of institutions is committed to developing the next generation of physician scientists in order to meet the pressing health needs of society. Educators and evaluators within this network may need to provide training to junior investigators beyond the traditional KL2 programs in order to advance their career development as physician scientists and clinical translational researchers. Clin Trans Sci 2014; Volume #: 1–6
    Clinical and Translational Science 07/2014; 7(6). DOI:10.1111/cts.12187 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper presents the current status and future perspectives of the research activity in the Center of General Surgery and Liver transplantation “Dan Setlacec” of Fundeni Clinical Institute (CCGTH „ Dan Setlacec”), focusing on the implementation of the concept of “translational medicine” within the framework of our center. This objective was fulfilled by setting-up a Center of research in translational medicine for the first time in Romania, whose activity has to be continuously adapted to the national and international research system in order to insure future development.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014