The upward spiral of health care costs has added to the scrutiny of medical decision making. A complex interaction between the patient, therapist, insurance company, physician, attorney and employer, with their inherent self-interests, adversarial relationships, secondary gain, and economic bias can lead to chaos as the system attempts to return an injured worker to the workplace. Medical
... [Show full abstract] professionals are being called upon to demonstrate their rationale and provide objective information that will bring about a reasonable resolution to the return-to-work dilemma. Both the physician and therapist play specific roles as they bring clinical expertise and sophisticated evaluation procedures to bear on this problem. Only by evaluating multiple factors and establishing a reasonable decision-making process can the individual who has sustained an upper extremity injury be returned to the job with a minimum amount of lost time while maintaining high expectations that he can perform the functional demands of the workplace.