January 2018
·
195 Reads
·
1 Citation
In Cambodia, cassava is the most important upland crop, but the crop is mostly grown without fertilizer for many years. The magnitudes of nutrient balances are not known. While improved technologies are needed for sustainable crop production, their adoption depends on how farmers view cassava against other crops. The objective of this study was to assess nutrient balances for cassava cultivation, and the perception of farmers on growing cassava relative to other crops. The study was conducted in Kampong Cham province, which has the largest and longest history of cassava production in the country. Forty five households in four zones were selected for the study. A farm survey employing a semi-structured interview combined with a field visit was used to collect data on cassava farmers' cultural practices, crop residue management and their perceptions on cassava and other potential crops. Crop cutting was done in 45 cassava fields of the sampled households to obtain root yields and weights of component plant parts, and a composite soil sample was taken from each field for analysis. Data were analyzed for nutrient balances and for farmers' perception on growing cassava against other upland crops. Nutrient balances were calculated for the individual fields based on the nutrient contents of the component sources obtained from the literature. The results show that the balances of all the nutrients evaluated were negative. The losses were most serious for N, K and Ca with the averages of-59.65 kg N,-53.08 kg K and-10.93 kg Ca/ha, but were less serious for P and Mg with the averages of-4.82 kg P and-6.16 kg Mg/ha. These negative balances were the consequence of low nutrient inputs in current practices where only a few farmers applied chemical fertilizers or manure, and only at low rates. With respect to farmers' perception, farmers in this area regard rice and cassava as their top priority crops, and have a greater preference for growing them than other crops. However, rice is grown for home consumption, while cassava is grown as a source of cash income. The marketing aspects of the crop, i.e. "good price" and "easy to sell", were the most important considerations for farmers' strong preference for cassava. Recently, production of cassava has increased substantially, reflecting increased market demand and prices. With the current trend of favorable marketing conditions, farmers will continue to have a strong preference for cassava, and are also likely to adopt improved technologies that will sustain or improve its yield, even if this entails extra input costs.