Mark Lindsey's research while affiliated with University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and other places

Therapies to elicit protective CTL require the selection of pathogen- and tumor-derived peptide ligands for presentation by MHC class I molecules. Edman sequencing of class I peptide pools generates "motifs" that indicate that nonameric ligands bearing conserved position 2 (P2) and P9 anchors provide the optimal search parameters for selecting immunogenic epitopes. To determine how well a motif represents its individual constituents, we used a hollow-fiber peptide production scheme followed by the mapping of endogenously processed class I peptide ligands through reverse-phase HPLC and mass spectrometry. Systematically mapping and characterizing ligands from B*1508, B*1501, B*1503, and B*1510 demonstrate that the peptides bound by these B15 allotypes i) vary in length from 7 to 12 residues, and ii) are more conserved at their C termini than their N-proximal P2 anchors. Comparative peptide mapping of these B15 allotypes further pinpoints endogenously processed ligands that bind to the allotypes B*1508, B*1501, and B*1503, but not B*1510. Overlapping peptide ligands are successful in binding to B*1501, B*1503, and B*1508 because these B15 allotypes share identical C-terminal anchoring pockets whereas B*1510 is divergent in the C-terminal pocket. Therefore, endogenous peptide loading into the B15 allotypes requires that a conserved C terminus be anchored in the appropriate specificity pocket while N-proximal anchors are more flexible in their location and sequence. Queries for overlapping and allele-specific peptide ligands may thus be contingent on a conserved C-terminal anchor.

Analysis of peptides derived from HLA class I molecules indicates that thousands of unique peptides are bound by a single molecular type, and sequence examination of the pooled constituents yields a motif which collectively defines the peptides bound by a given class I molecule. Motifs resulting from pooled sequencing are then used to infer whether particular viral and tumor protein fragments might serve as class I-presented peptide therapeutics. Still undetermined from a pooled motif is the breadth or range of peptides in the population which are brought together to form the pooled motif, and it is therefore not yet known how representative of the population a pooled motif is. By employing hollow fiber bioreactors for large-scale production of HLA class I molecules, sufficient peptides are produced to investigate individual subsets of peptides comprising a motif. Edman sequencing and mass spectrometric analysis of peptides eluted from HLA-B*1501 reveal that many peptide sequences fail to align with either the N- or C-terminal anchors predicted for the B*1501 peptide motif through whole pool sequencing. These analyses further reveal auxiliary anchors not previously detected and peptides significantly larger and smaller than the predicted nonamer, ranging from 6 to 12 amino acids in length. These results demonstrate that constituents of the B*1501 peptide pool vary markedly in comparison with one another and therefore in comparison with previously established B*1501 motifs, and such complexity indicates that many of the peptide ligands presented to CTL cannot be predicted using class I consensus motifs as search criteria.

A peptide-based vaccine must be bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex class I molecules to elicit a CD8(+) T-cell response. Because class I HLA molecules are highly polymorphic, it has yet to be established how well a vaccine peptide that stimulates one individual's CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes will be presented by a second individual's different class I molecules. Therefore, to facilitate precise comparisons of class I peptide binding overlaps, we uniquely combined hollow-fiber bioreactors and mass spectrometry to assign precise peptide binding signatures to individual class I HLA molecules. In applying this strategy to HLA-B*1501, we isolated milligram quantities of B*1501-bound peptides and mapped them using mass spectrometry. Repeated analyses consistently assign the same peptide binding signature to B*1501; the degree of peptide binding overlap between any two class I molecules can thus be determined through comparison of their peptide signatures.