Jiyoung Yoon's research while affiliated with University of North Texas and other places

Objective Verbal fluency evaluation in bilingual speakers should include dual-language assessment to obtain a comprehensive profile of word retrieval abilities. This study is the first to compare classic semantic, action, emotional, and phonemic fluency in terms of the magnitude of their performance gaps between the dominant and nondominant language in unbalanced bilingual speakers. We also examined the quantitative relationship between language dominance and verbal fluency performance. Method Twenty-six bilingual adults completed a comprehensive set of classic semantic (“animals,” “vegetables”), action (“do”), emotional (“happy,” “sad,” “afraid”), and phonemic (“F,” “A,” “S”) fluency tasks in their dominant language (English) and nondominant language (Spanish) in two sessions on separate days. Participants also completed subjective and objective measures of language proficiency. Results All tasks yielded fewer correct responses in the nondominant language. The between-languages performance gap was the largest for “animals” and the smallest for emotional fluency. “Happy” yielded the most balanced performance among all semantic tasks and a positivity bias that was unaffected by language dominance. Finally, language dominance scores computed by a newly developed formula indicated relationships between self-rated proficiency and fluency performance. Conclusions This study provides preliminary, normative data of classic semantic, action, emotional, and phonemic fluency that could be used to gauge unbalanced bilingual speakers' performance. Significant impacts of language dominance on “animals” demand caution in using this widely used classic semantic category in evaluating bilingual speakers' performance. The data also underscore the robustness of positivity biases in emotional fluency and the validity of using subjective measures to supplement neuropsychological assessment of fluency performance.

Objective Assessing neuropsychological functions of dual-language speakers with semantic verbal fluency should consider the impact of language proficiency. Much evidence for the proficiency effect is found in tasks targeting neutral words. The proficiency effect on emotional verbal fluency (Emo-VF) that targets emotional word retrieval, however, is far from conclusive. This study aimed to clarify the proficiency effect on Emo-VF, specifically the extent to which language proficiency impacted positive and negative word retrieval comparably. In addition, the study examined the extent to which dual-languages speakers produced duplicated items and unique, non-duplicated items in each of two languages tested. Method Thirty-two adult participants completed Emo-VF tasks that targeted a comprehensive set of basic emotions (“joy,” “sadness,” “fear,” “anger,” “disgust”) in English and Spanish in two sessions separated by at least 72 h. All participants exhibited greater proficiency in English than in Spanish according to subjective and objective measures of language proficiency. Results Verbal productivity was comparably lowered for all emotions in the less proficient language. Differences among categories were consistent between languages, with “joy” eliciting more words than other emotions, and “fear” yielding the highest productivity among negative emotions. Finally, dual-language speakers produced a significant number of unique items in different languages, especially for “fear.” Conclusion Language proficiency exerts a general effect on positive and negative word retrieval. The study extends previous work by revealing differences between “fear” and other negative categories in addition to replicating positivity biases in unbalanced dual-language speakers. Dual-language testing is valuable in capturing the richness of emotional word repertoire associated with different languages.