Caroline Wehrmann's scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Introduction: Living Labs Under Construction
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2023

·

73 Reads

·

1 Citation

Journal of Science Communication

Caroline Wehrmann

·

·

·

Andreas Bischof

Living Labs galore. Involving citizens and other stakeholders in science endeavors and integrating them in the design of new technologies and scientific inquiry is a core aim of contemporary research and development. Living labs are prime places in the quest of science to be more inclusive and to open up to people from all walks of life, including politics, design, and culture. Promising to foster participation, collaboration and co-creation around science, living labs have been mushrooming across the academe, from STEM subjects to the humanities. In fact, they have become the token for an up-to-date science communication that is not satisfied with conveying expert information but seeks an exchange with people that are addressed as the participants of, not just the audience for research. That said, it is also in living labs where the tension between the normative axioms and the precarious implementation of participatory science become succinctly apparent.

Download
Share

Citations (1)


... Knowledge institutes, including universities and research institutes, increasingly realise that, to remain trustworthy and relevant, it is important to 'open up' to society [Berg & Lidskog, 2018] through science-society interactions [Hagendijk, 2004;Wilsdon & Willis, 2004]. This can take many forms, for instance citizen science, living labs, open science, or transdisciplinary research projects [Brandt et al., 2013;European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2016;Hecker et al., 2018;Kalinauskaite et al., 2021;Wehrmann, Pentzold, Rothe & Bischof, 2023]. Another way of improving science-society interaction is through a specific form of conversation: dialogue. ...

Reference:

University-led dialogues with society: balancing informing and listening?
Introduction: Living Labs Under Construction

Journal of Science Communication