Caitlin C. Garvey's research while affiliated with St. Cloud State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Comparing In-View to Out-of-View Stimulus Arrangements When Teaching Receptive Labels for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Article

July 2021

·

36 Reads

·

3 Citations

Behavior Analysis in Practice

Caitlin C. Garvey

·

·

·

[...]

·

One common best practice recommendation for teaching receptive labels to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder is for the stimulus array to be arranged outside of the view of the learner. Another strategy that may have benefits would be to arrange the stimuli in view of the learner. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness and efficiency of arranging the stimulus array in view versus out of view of the learner when teaching receptive labels to three children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The results of an adapted alternating-treatments design demonstrated that both conditions were effective, and all participants reached the mastery criterion on all training sets. However, the in-view condition was more, or equally, efficient with respect to sessions to mastery when compared to the out-of-view condition. The results are discussed with respect to clinical and research implications for best practice recommendations related to teaching receptive language.

Share

Citations (1)


... The difference in responding highlights potential considerations for the arrangements. Comparison-first allows for scanning before and during the cue, which can be beneficial for some learners; however, the visual array may be distracting for other learners, who then may not attend to the cue, causing errors or faulty stimulus control (Garvey et al., 2021;Leon et al., 2020). For Peter, the comparison-first condition had more errors during the progressive time delay, whereas the sample-first condition had more prompt responses during the progressive time delay. ...

Reference:

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF PRE-REQUISITE SKILLS ON THE OUTCOMES OF AUDITORY-VISUAL CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TASKS
Comparing In-View to Out-of-View Stimulus Arrangements When Teaching Receptive Labels for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Citing Article
  • July 2021

Behavior Analysis in Practice