ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

To verify the prevalence of acute hyperglycemia in children with head trauma stratified by the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). A prospective cross-sectional study carried out with information from medical records of pediatric patients presenting with head injury in the emergency room of a referral emergency hospital during a one year period. We considered the cut-off value of 150 mg/dL to define hyperglycemia. A total of 340 children were included and 60 (17.6%) had admission hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia was present in 9% of mild head trauma cases; 30.4% of those with moderate head trauma and 49% of severe head trauma. We observed that among children with higher blood glucose levels, 85% had abnormal findings on cranial computed tomography scans. Hyperglycemia was more prevalent in patients with severe head trauma (GCS <8), regardless if they had or not multiple traumas and in children with abnormal findings on head computed tomography scans.





José Roberto Tude Melo1, Rodolfo Casimiro Reis2, Laudenor Pereira Lemos-Júnior2,
Henrique Miguel Santos Coelho2, Carlos Eduardo Romeu de Almeida2, Jamary Oliveira-Filho3
  Objective: 
  Method: 


  Results: 


 Conclusion: 




  Objetivo: 
 Método: 



  Resultados: 



  Conclusão: 







Dr. José Roberto Tude Melo – Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos/UFBA - Rua Augusto Viana sn / 2º andar - 40110-060 Salvador BA - Brasil.
E-mail: robertotude@gmail.com


























Study design and data collection






















Hyperglycemia






Ethical concerns and data analyses





χ




±











<

<





 






























































1. Kuzuya T, Nakagawa S, Satoh J, et al. Report of the Committee on the
classication and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res
Clin Pract 2002;55:65-85.
2. Tominaga M. [Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus]. Rinsho Byori
1999;47:901-908.
3. Chiaretti A, De BR, Langer A, et al. Prognostic implications of hyperg-
lycaemia in paediatric head injury. Childs Nerv Syst 1998;14:455-459.
4. Chiaretti A, Piastra M, Pulitano S, et al. Prognostic factors and outcome
of children with severe head injury: an 8-year experience. Childs Nerv
Syst 2002;18:129-136.
5. Cochran A, Scaife ER, Hansen KW, Downey EC. Hyperglycemia and
outcomes from pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2003;55:
1035-1038.
6. Lam AM, Winn HR, Cullen BF, Sundling N. Hyperglycemia and neu-
rological outcome in patients with head injury. J Neurosurg 1991;75:
545-551.
7. Sung J, Bochicchio GV, Joshi M, Bochicchio K, Tracy K, Scalea TM. Ad-
mission hyperglycemia is predictive of outcome in critically ill trauma
patients. J Trauma 2005;59:80-83.
8. Schelp AO, Burini RC. [Cerebral glucose metabolism in craniocerebral
trauma: an evaluation]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1995;53:698-705.
9. Yamaguchi N. Sympathoadrenal system in neuroendocrine control of
glucose: mechanisms involved in the liver, pancreas, and adrenal gland
under hemorrhagic and hypoglycemic stress. Can J Physiol Pharmacol
1992;70:167-206.
10. Parish RA, Webb KS. Hyperglycemia is not a poor prognostic sign in
head-injured children. J Trauma 1988;28:517-519.
11. World Health Organization. Child and adolescent health and develop-
ment. Available at (http:///www.who.int/en/) Accessed November
01, 2007.
12. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness.
A practical scale. Lancet 1974 13;7872;81-84.
13. Marcoux KK. Management of increased intracranial pressure in the
critically ill child with an acute neurological injury. AACN Clin Issues
2005;16:212-231.
14. Orliaguet GA, Meyer PG, Baugnon T. Management of critically ill chil-
dren with traumatic brain injury. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18 :455-461.
15. Melo JR, Santana DL, Pereira JL, Ribeiro TF. [Traumatic brain injury in
children and adolescents at Salvador City, Bahia, Brazil]. Arq Neurop-
siquiatr 2006;64:994-996.
16. Melo JR, Silva RA, Moreira ED Jr. [Characteristics of patients with head in-
jury at Salvador City (Bahia--Brazil)]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62;711-714.
17. Bochicchio GV, Sung J, Joshi M, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia is predic-
tive of outcome in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma 2005;58;921-924.
18. Bochicchio GV, Joshi M, Bochicchio KM, et al. Early hyperglycemic
control is important in critically injured trauma patients. J Trauma
2007;63;1353-1358.
19. Epstein J, Breslow MJ. The stress response of critical illness. Crit Care
Clin 1999;15;17-33.
20. Hirsch IB. In-patient hyperglycemia--are we ready to treat it yet? J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2002;87;975-977.
21. Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hy-
perglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients
with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87;978-982.
22. Parejo P, Stahl N, Xu W, Reinstrup P, Ungerstedt U, Nordstrom CH. Ce-
rebral energy metabolism during transient hyperglycemia in patients
with severe brain trauma. Intensive Care Med 2003;29;544-550.
23. Jeremitsky E, Omert LA, Dunham CM, Wilberger J, Rodriguez A. The
impact of hyperglycemia on patients with severe brain injury. J Trau-
ma 2005;58;47-50.
24. Laird AM, Miller PR, Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Relation-
ship of early hyperglycemia to mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma
2004;56;1058-1062.
25. Durr JA, Hoffman WH, Sklar AH, el GT, Steinhart CM. Correlates of
brain edema in uncontrolled IDDM. Diabetes 1992;41;627-632.
26. Kushner M, Nencini P, Reivich M, et al. Relation of hyperglycemia ear-
ly in ischemic brain infarction to cerebral anatomy, metabolism, and
clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1990;28: 129-135.
... Some authors dispute the link between hyperglycemia and a bad prognosis in TBI and contend that elevated blood sugar levels are temporary and typically indicate a body's response to injury (27) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To review the influence of metabolic dysfunction of glucose after traumatic brain injury on patient mortality. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Medline, and Embase electronic databases, involving publications from 1980 to August 2017 in English and Spanish. Results The glucose metabolism in brain involved in brain signal conduction, neurotransmission, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive function. Insulin levels traverse the blood–brain barrier by utilizing an insulin receptor protein as a carrier, playing a pivotal role in various cognitive functions while also regulating energy metabolism. TBI causes elevated blood glucose levels. Hyperglycemia is attributed to an acute sympatho-adrenomedullary response, resulting in elevated catecholamines, increased levels of cortisol, and IL-6. Moreover, there is a potential association with hypothalamic involvement. Additionally, hyperglycemia is linked to lactic acidosis at the tissue level, ultimately contributing to higher mortality rates. Conclusions The monitoring and control of glucose should be an important part of multimodal monitoring in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury managed in neurocritical care units. A management protocol should ensure normoglycemia and early detection and correction of glucose abnormalities since it improves patients' clinical outcomes.
Article
Introduction: The aim of the work is to update the "Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury" published in 2012, to reflect the new available evidence, and develop the Italian national guideline for the management of severe pediatric head injuries to reduce variation in practice and ensure optimal care to patients. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 2009 to October 2017. Inclusion criteria were: English language, pediatric populations (0-18 years) or mixed populations (pediatric-adult) with available age subgroup analyses. The guideline development process was started by the Promoting Group that composed a multidisciplinary panel of experts, with the representatives of the Scientific Societies, the independent expert specialists and a representative of the Patient Associations. The panel selected the clinical questions, discussed the evidences and formulated the text of the recommendations. The documentarists of the University of Florence oversaw the bibliographic research strategy. A group of literature reviewers evaluated the selected literature and compiled the table of evidence for each clinical question. Evidence synthesis: The search strategies identified 4254 articles. We selected 3227 abstract (first screening) and, finally included 67 articles (second screening) to update the guideline. This Italian update includes 25 evidence-based recommendations and 5 research recommendations. Conclusions: In recent years, progress has been made on the understanding of severe pediatric brain injury, as well as on that concerning all major traumatic pathology. This has led to a progressive improvement in the clinical outcome, although the quantity and quality of evidence remains particularly low.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Head Trauma (HT) is a major cause of death, disability and important public health problem. HT is also the main cause of hyperglycaemia that can increase mortality. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between hyperglycaemia with neurological outcomes following severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive and correlation study that was carried out at the Imam Khomeini Hospital affiliated with Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR, during March 2014–March 2015 on patients with severe TBI. Data were collected from the patient records on mortality, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, admission GCS score, Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanical ventilation, Ventilation Associated Pneumonia (VAP) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Random Blood Sugar (RBS) level on admission was recorded. Patients with diabetes mellitus (to minimize the overlap between acute stress hyperglycaemia and diabetic hyperglycaemia) were excluded. Results: About 34(40%) of patients were admitted with hyperglycaemia (RBS ≥ 200 mg/dl) over the study period. The mortality rate, length of ICU stay, hospital stay, ISS and VAP & ARDS in patients with RBS levels ≥ 200 mg was significantly higher than patients with RBS levels below ≤ 200mg (p
Article
Background and purpose: Hyperglycemia leads to some complications in traumatic patients and its control could improve the patient's prognosis. In this study the prevalence of hyperglycemia and its effects were investigated in patients with multiple traumas. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study the blood glucose levels of 472 multiple trauma patients attending emergency department at Imam Hossein Hospital were measured in June-Oct 2010. Diabetic patients were excluded. SPSS ver.16 was applied to analyze the data. Results: The incidence of posttraumatic hyperglycemia in multiple trauma victims was 20%. There was a significant relationship between posttraumatic hyperglycemia and presence of fracture (FX). However, no significant correlation was observed between hyperglycemia and age, sex, mechanism of trauma, and site of trauma. Moreover, this study found a significant correlation between hyperglycemia and intracranial bleeding. Conclusion: Considering high rate of posttraumatic hyperglycemia and previous findings on controlling and improving the patient's prognosis, we recommend checking the blood glucose level of trauma patients' on arrival, particularly among those suspected of having FX. However, further studies are needed to investigate this issue in other traumas.
Article
Full-text available
Hyperglycemia is a common secondary insult associated with an increased risk of mortality and poor outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the effect of hyperglycemia on outcomes of severe TBI in children and adolescents is less apparent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of hyperglycemia with mortality in pediatric patients with severe TBI. In this cross-sectional study, data of all children and adolescents with severe TBI admitted to Poursina Hospital in Rasht, including age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) upon admission, mortality rate, hospital length of stay, and serial blood glucose during the first three consecutive ICU days following admission, were reviewed from April 2007 to May 2011. After univariate analysis and adjustment for related covariates, logistic regression model was established to determine the association between persistent hyperglycemia and outcome. One-hundred and twenty-two children were included with a median admission GCS of 6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5-7) and a median age of 13 years (IQR 7.75-17). Among them, 91 were boys (74.6 %) and 31 were girls (26.6 %); the overall mortality was 40.2 % (n = 49). Patients who died had a significantly greater blood glucose levels than survivors for the first 3 days of admission (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, persistent hyperglycemia during the first 3 days of admission had an adjusted odds ratio of 11.11 for mortality (P < 0.001). Early hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcome, and persistent hyperglycemia is a powerful and independent predictor of mortality in children and adolescents with severe TBI.
Article
Full-text available
To investigate the function of an experimental cranium trauma model in rats. The equipment, already described in the literature and under discreet adaptations, is composed by a platform that produces closed head impact controlled by weight drop with pre-defined and known energy. 25 Wistar male rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus) were divided into five equal groups that received different quantities of cranial impact energy: G1, G2, G3 and G4 with 0,234J, 0,5J, 0,762J and 1J respectively and G5 (Sham). Under intense analgesia, each group was evaluated clinically in a sequence of intervals and had their encephalon removed for pathologic analysis. Important clinical alterations (convulsions, bradycardia, bradypnea and abnormal postures) and focal pathologic (hematomas and hemorrhages) kept proportion with the intensity of the impact. No fracture was observed and the group 4 had 80% mortality rate. The experimental cranium trauma animal model by weight drop is an alternative of low cost and easy reproduction that allows evaluating clinical and pathological alterations in accordance with studies in experimental surgery aims for new traumatic brain injury approach in rats.
Article
Full-text available
The authors give a general overview on the cerebral glucose metabolism, with special reference to brain injury, including intake, blood-brain barrier properties for glucose transport, oxidative metabolism and energetic needs during the head trauma. The evidences of the presence of ischemia and hypoxia in those situations and the relationships with the cerebral glucose metabolism are discussed. They point out to the several explanations for hyperglicemia present up to 10 days after admission in brain injury, relating to the energetic needs at different phases of head trauma recovery. Some considerations are made about the lack of evidences on increase in glucose consumption or lactate production when hyperglycemia occurs in association with brain damage and ischemia caused by head trauma. The brain capacity to compensate metabolic disturbances is discussed. Some questions are made about current indications for restriction of glucose infusion in patients who are in catabolic phase and need to spare their body protein pool. At the same way, the polemic about previous hyperglycemia and cerebral injury is revised. Some considerations are made about the moment to introduct increases in glucose administration.
Article
Full-text available
Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (HUPES) -Universidade Federal da Bahia e Hospital Geral do Estado da Bahia, Salvador BA, Brasil: 1 N e u ro c i ru rgião do Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos -Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador BA, Brasil (UFBA), Mestre em Medicina pela UFBA; 2 Acadêmico de Medicina da UFBA. Recebido 29 Março 2006, recebido na forma final 11 Julho 2006. Aceito 29 Agosto 2006. D r. José Roberto Tude Melo -Alameda dos Jasmins 200 / 702 B -40290-200 Salvador BA -Brasil. RESUMO -Objetivo: Verificar a freqüência de trauma craniencefálico (TCE) nos indivíduos entre 0 e 19 anos, de acordo com o gênero, idade e etiologia. Método: Estudo descritivo realizado por meio da pesquisa em prontuário e relato das vítimas de trauma craniencefálico com idade até 19 anos, admitidas em hospital de referência para o atendimento a politraumatizados no Estado da Bahia, por um período de 1 ano. Resultados: Amostra constituída de 390 pacientes, dentre os quais 280 (71,8%) eram do sexo masculino. A faixa etária mais acometida foi a de adolescentes (10 a 19 anos) com 177 pacientes (45,4%). A causa mais comum foi a queda de altura (34,4%). Segundo a pontuação na Escala de Coma de Glasgow, 89% dos pacientes sofreram TCE leve. Conclusão: O grupo de adolescentes foi o mais atingido, sendo a queda de altura a principal causa de TCE, com predomínio do gênero masculino, havendo preponderância do trauma leve. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: traumatismo craniencefálico, crianças, adolescentes, epidemiologia.
Article
Full-text available
OBJETIVO: Descrever as características de pacientes com traumatismo cranioencefálico (TCE) na cidade do Salvador, assim como determinar as faixas etárias mais acometidas e definir as taxas de morbidade e letalidade. MÉTODO: Revisão retrospectiva de 555 prontuários de vítimas de TCE internadas no Hospital Geral do Estado da Bahia (HGE) no ano de 2001, com posterior preenchimento de questionário. RESULTADOS: Foram verificados 82,9% de vítimas do sexo masculino e 17,1% do sexo feminino com principal faixa etária entre 21 e 30 anos. A principal causa de TCE foi acidente com meios de transporte (40,7%), seguido das agressões com ou sem armas (25,4%) e quedas (24%). Foi evidenciada taxa de morbidade de 24,9% e letalidade de 22,9%. CONCLUSÃO: Os mais envolvidos no TCE foram adultos jovens do sexo masculino, tendo como principal causa os acidentes com meios de transporte, com taxas elevadas de morbidade e letalidade.
Article
Introduction: Recent randomized prospective data suggest that early hyperglycemia is associated with excess mortality in critically ill patients, and tight glucose control leads to improved outcome. This concept has not been carefully examined in trauma patients, and the relationship of early hyperglycemia to mortality from sepsis in this population is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship different levels of early blood glucose elevation to outcome in a trauma ICU population. Methods: The records of all patients admitted to the ICU over a 2-year period at a Level I trauma center were reviewed for age, injury severity scores (ISS), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, base deficit (BD), blood glucose, and mortality. Three possible cutoffs in defining hyperglycemia were examined (glucose ≥110 mg/dL, ≥150 mg/dL, ≥200 mg/dL) in relation to infection and mortality. Early hyperglycemia was defined as elevated blood glucose on hospital days 1 or 2. Those with diabetes mellitus were excluded. Results: From 1/00-12/01, 516 eligible patients were admitted to the ICU after injury. Early hyperglycemia occurred in 483 at the ≥110 mg/dL level, 311 at the ≥150 mg/dL level, and 90 patients at the ≥200 mg/dL level. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated a significant relationship between ISS and subsequent infection (p = 0.02) and a trend toward such a relationship in GCS score, glucose ≥150 mg/dL, and glucose ≥200 mg/dL (p = 0.06, 0.12, and 0.06). A similar analysis for the relationship of these variables to eventual mortality showed a significant correlation with all examined variables except glucose ≥110 mg/dL. Multiple logistic regression to control for the effect of age, ISS, GCS score, and BD found early glucose ≥200 mg/dL to be an independent predictor of both infection and mortality while no such relationship was found with ≥110 mg/dL or ≥150 mg/dL. Conclusions: Early hyperglycemia as defined by glucose ≥200 mg/dL is associated with significantly higher infection and mortality rates in trauma patients independent of injury characteristics. This was not true at the cutoffs of ≥110 mg/dL or ≥150 mg/dL. These data support the need for a prospective analysis of tight glucose control, keeping serum glucose <200 mg/dL in critically ill trauma patients. However, aggressive maintenance of levels <110 mg/dL as reported by others may not be necessary.
Article
Glucose homeostasis is maintained by complex neuroendocrine control mechanisms, involving three peripheral organs: the liver, pancreas, and adrenal gland, all of which are under control of the autonomic nervous system. During the past decade, abundant results from various studies on neuroendocrine control of glucose have been accumulated. The principal objective of this review is to provide overviews of basic adrenergic mechanisms closely related to glucose control in the three peripheral organs, and then to discuss the integrated glucoregulatory mechanisms in hemorrhage-induced hypotension and insulin-induced hypoglycemia with special reference to sympathoadrenal control mechanisms. The liver is richly innervated by sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves. The functional implication in glucoregulation of sympathetic nerves has been well-documented, while that of parasympathetic nerves remains less understood. More recently, hepatic glucoreceptors have been postulated to be coupled with capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves, conveying sensory signals of blood glucose concentration to the central nervous system. The pancreas is also richly supplied by the autonomic nervous system. Besides the well documented adrenergic and cholinergic mechanisms, the potential implication of peptidergic neurotransmission by neuropeptide Y and neuromodulation by galanin has recently been postulated in the endocrine secretory function. Presynaptic interactions of these putative peptidergic neurotransmitters with the classic transmitters, noradrenaline and acetylcholine, in the pancreas remain to be clarified. It may be of particular interest that it was vagus nerve stimulation that caused a dominant release of neuropeptide Y over that caused by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the pig pancreas. The adrenal medulla receives its main nerve supply from the greater and lesser splanchnic nerves. Adrenal medullary catecholamine secretion appears to be regulated by three distinct local mechanisms: adrenoceptor-mediated, dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca2+ channel-mediated, and capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerve-mediated mechanisms. In response to hemorrhagic hypotension and insulin-induced hypoglycemia, the sympathoadrenal system is activated resulting in increases of adrenal catecholamine and pancreatic glucagon secretions, both of which are significantly implicated in glucoregulatory mechanisms. An increase in sympathetic nerve activity occurs in the liver during hemorrhagic hypotension and is also likely to occur in the pancreas in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia. The functional implication of hepatic and central glucoreceptors has been suggested in the increased secretion of glucose counterregulatory hormones, particularly catecholamines and glucagon.