BookPDF Available

Čeští novináři v komparativní perspektivě: hybridní, virtuální a mizející žurnalisté v post-transformační fázi

Authors:
  • FOCUS - social and market analysis research

Abstract

Journalistic profession, in the form established after the Second World War, is facing a paradigmatic change which is usually preceded by a state of crisis. This process has been affecting Czech journalists as well. The book Czech Journalists in Comparative Perspective characterizes Czech journalists’ values and professional attitudes and the transmutations of these in the last post-transformational phase of post-November building of the new media system. The study is based on five quantitative and qualitative analysis realised between 2003 and 2016 and it is composed in the form of two comparative perspectives. It does both, compares the attitudes of Czech journalists in the last 15 years, and it compares them to their selected foreign colleagues. The text describes Czech journalists in seven chapters, linked together by the aim to capture the causes of the professional crisis as well as the potential for its solution. Thus, it looks for the roots of the credibility loss of Czech journalists, but it also relates to the whole process of their professional socialization coming about under the influence of media system oligarchization, as well as hybridization and virtualization of professional practice and relations. Both of which deepen the professional identity split of Czech journalists. The study depicts Czech journalists in generational perspective and poses a question whether the post-transitional phase brings generational differentiation, and to what extent the performance of journalistic role is being formed by generational experience viewed in historical-power perspective. These processes are discernible already with domestic journalism students who have been compared to their Polish and Swedish counterparts. Towards the end, the text proposes to conclude a new symbolic contract between journalists and the Czech public.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Globally, countries with large percentages of women in the journalistic profession have the largest percentages of women in senior-level decision-making positions ) Byerly & McGraw, 2020(. However, while women in Czech journalism have almost reached parity with men, representing 45% of all journalists ) Volek & Urbániková, 2017(, only 2 of the 28 major Czech news outlets )7%( have a female editor-in-chief. 1 How do female journalists who are now in decision-making positions and have the power to change organizational culture think about gender? How do they perceive the barriers that hinder women's career progression? ...
Article
Full-text available
Female journalists worldwide still struggle for adequate representation in leadership positions. This study contributes to the (mainly Western) scholarship on gender barriers in journalism by exploring the mechanism of vertical gender segregation in the journalistic profession in the Czech Republic, a non-Western country with the legacy of a women’s emancipation project sponsored by the former communist regime. Semi-structured interviews ( N = 17) with female journalists in leadership positions revealed five main barriers: overall gender inequality in the Czech society; family and household responsibilities; lower self-esteem and ambition in women; sexism and sexual harassment; and masculine newsroom culture and “old boys’ clubs.”
... Whereas in 2005 only 12% of people over 16 were using the internet to read news or newspapers, in 2017 it was already 71% (Czech Statistical Office 2023). During the studied period, Czech journalists perceived economic pressure as the most important external influences on their work (Metyková and Waschková Císařová 2009;Volek and Urbániková 2017). Particularly for the editors of quality dailies, this economic imperative posed a key professional dilemma (Volek 2010). ...
... <a> DATA AND METHODS The data corpus contains all front-page articles during the period of interest on the issue of climate change in the four major national newspapers which satisfy the 'quality press' criterion (McCombs, 2004; see Barkemeyer et al., 2017). The newspapers' editorial ideology ranges from the liberal right perspective of Lidové noviny and Hospodářské noviny through Mladá fronta Dnes' centrist position to the traditional social democratic standpoint of Právo (see Volek and Urbániková, 2017). It is worth noting that chairman of governing party ANO 2011 and current Prime Minister Andrej Babiš acquired the MAFRA publishing house that issues Lidové noviny and Mladá fronta Dnes in 2013. ...
Chapter
Despite the overwhelming scientific consensus on the existence and serious impacts of anthropogenic climate change, diverse societal actors strive to undermine both its scientific basis and derived policy responses. Mass media constitute a key discursive space where such actors attempt to influence public understanding and thereby particular policy (non)responses. This research focuses on media communication strategies of climate sceptics in the Czech Republic. It uses discourse network analysis to examine a corpus compiled from four major national newspapers between 2009 and 2018. The results show a crucial role for former President Klaus, who was the most represented actor on the issue. Sceptics mostly resorted to a counter-framing strategy based on questioning the integrity and motivations of climate scientists and climate protection supporters. This research provides supportive evidence that the Anglo-American model of climate scepticism has been successfully adopted in the context of post-communist Europe.
... Specifically, this included all four major daily newspapers Mladá fronta Dnes, Právo, Lidové noviny, and Hospodářské noviny, peripheral Haló noviny (closely linked to the Communist Party); and 11 regional newspapers (Deník) issued under Vltava Labe Press publishing house. The editorial ideology of the major national newspapers ranges from the traditional social democratic perspective of Právo through Mladá fronta Dnes' centrist position to the liberal right in the case of Lidové noviny and Hospodářské noviny (for more, see Volek & Urbániková, 2017). It is worth noting that then chairman of junior governing party ANO 2011 and Finance Minister Andrej Babiš acquired the MAFRA publishing house that issues Lidové noviny and Mladá fronta Dnes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Transitioning to a decarbonized economy is a crucial part of climate change mitigation, with the phasing-out of coal, as the most significant source of carbon dioxide emissions, being the centerpiece of this effort. In the European context, the increasing pressures exerted especially on the basis of the European Union's energy and climate policy, coupled with the inherent uncertainty of the transition process, encourage various struggles among the involved policy actors over the setting of specific transition pathways. One site of such contestation is media discourse, which may facilitate or limit policy change through agenda-setting, framing, and other processes. Importantly, discursive struggles also include industry incumbents, who have a vested interest in preserving the existing sociotechnical regime. This paper focuses on the position of incumbents in terms of their relationship with governing political parties and the discursive strategies they employ. It explores the policy debate on coal mining expansion which took place in 2015 in the Czech Republic, a post-communist country with a coal-dependent economy, skeptical position on energy transition, and a powerful energy industry. The research employs discourse network analysis to examine a corpus compiled from daily newspapers and applies block modeling techniques to analyze patterns of relationships within and between actor groups. The results show that incumbents successfully prevented policy change in the direction of rapid coal phase-out by exploiting discourse alignment with governing parties and efficiently employing discursive strategies based primarily on securitization of socioeconomic issues.
Article
Full-text available
On the surface, it may look like there are no news deserts in the Czech Republic, but that does not mean that all audiences are able to get relevant local news. Apart from independent local news outlets, which are diminishing, Czech districts are served by information provided either by a delocalised publishing chain or a municipality press that promotes the local government. I will focus on the emergence of news deserts from the perspective of independent local newspapers, especially on the structural changes that lead to the declining number of media outlets that offer local news in Czechia. Moreover, I take the bottom-up approach to reflect on the local journalists’ point of view. The mixed-method research, which was conducted in 2019 and 2020, consisted of a survey of local newspaper owners and in-depth interviews with local journalists. I identified several structural changes to both the local newspapers and to the general publishing industry that have led to growing organisational and economic problems for the local newspapers, and often to their demise. Local news is still carried by newspapers, which depend on the traditional business model and are slow with their digital transition. Their survival is based on (non)cooperation with either ancillary organisations (printing office, distribution firm, and sales outlet) or other local newspapers. Newspapers are cornered by the demands of external actors; their economic stability depends on the self-sufficiency of their production.
Book
Full-text available
Ideová nerovnováha a jednostrannosť v ekonomicko-mediálnom diskurze Slovenska, ktorý je v porovnaní s vyspelým svetom výrazne vychýlený doprava, je fakt, ktorý priznávajú časť zástupcov slovenského liberalizmu či neoliberalizmu. Cieľom publikácie, ktorú vydalo slovenské zastúpenie Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, bolo poukázať na tento stav a malým dielom tak prispieť k vyrovnávaniu tejto nerovnováhy, ktorá je, podľa autorov aj vydavateľa, v neprospech ľudí na Slovensku. Druhým motívom bolo poukázať na to, akými procesmi je táto dominancia pravicového ekonomického názoru vo verejnej diskusii tvorená a udržiavaná.
Article
Full-text available
After viewing identical samples of major network television coverage of the Beirut massacre, both pro-Israeli and pro-Arab partisans rated these programs, and those responsible for them, as being biased against their side. This hostile media phenomenon appears to involve the operation of two separate mechanisms. First, partisans evaluated the fairness of the media's sample of facts and arguments differently: in light of their own divergent views about the objective merits of each side's case and their corresponding views about the nature of unbiased coverage. Second, partisans reported different perceptions and recollections about the program content itself; that is, each group reported more negative references to their side than positive ones, and each predicted that the coverage would sway nonpartisans in a hostile direction. Within both partisan groups, furthermore, greater knowledge of the crisis was associated with stronger perceptions of media bias. Charges of media bias, we concluded, may reflect more than self-serving attempts to secure preferential treatment. They may result from the operation of basic cognitive and perceptual mechanisms, mechanisms that should prove relevant to perceptions of fairness or objectivity in a wide range of mediation and negotiation contexts.
Book
Where does journalism fit in the media landscape of blogs, tweets, Facebook postings, YouTube videos, and literally billions of Web pages? Public Journalism 2.0 examines the ways that civic or public journalism is evolving, especially as audience-created content―sometimes referred to as citizen journalism or participatory journalism―becomes increasingly prominent in contemporary media. As the contributors to this edited volume demonstrate, the mere use of digital technologies is not the fundamental challenge of a new citizen-engaged journalism; rather, a depper understanding of how civic/public journalism can inform citizen-propelled initiatives is required. Through a mix of original research, essays, interviews, and case studies, this collection establishes how public journalism principles and practices offer journalists, scholars, and citizens insights into how digital technology and other contemporary practices can increase civic engagement and improve public life. Each chapter concludes with pedagogical features including: * Theoretical Implications highlighting the main theoretical lessons from each chapter, * Practical Implications applying the chapter's theoretical findings to the practice of citizen-engaged jouranlis, *Reflection Questions prompting the reader to consider how to extend the theory and application of the chapter.