ArticlePDF Available

Global Multiculturals 1

Authors:

Abstract

Drawing on psychological research, we examine how individuals who have been exposed to multiple cultures differ in their cultural experiences, cultural identities, and adaptation to foreign cultures. A survey of multicultural business students found that those who first moved to a foreign country at a relatively younger age and moved to relatively more countries over their lives constituted a distinct subset of multicultural individuals. Labeling these individuals " globals " , we found that they were less likely to identify with cultural groups and less culturally adaptive. These results suggest that there is no single type of " multiculturalism " , and that having more and earlier multicultural experiences does not necessarily predict better adaptation outcomes. More nuanced examination of multicultural individuals' past experiences and psychology is needed to understand how they can better leverage their skills as global leaders. Running head: Global Multiculturals Forthcoming in International Studies in Management and Organization 2013 Special Issue: " Advancing the Field—New Directions for Global Mobility " Kathrin J. Hanek is a doctoral candidate in the
Global&Multiculturals&1!
!
Kathrin&J.&Hanek,&Fiona&Lee,&and&Mary&Yoko&Brannen&
Individual)Differences)Among)Global/Multicultural)Individuals:)Cultural)
Experiences,)Identity,)and)Adaptation)&
Abstract:&Drawing&on&psychological&research,&we&examine&how&individuals&who&have&
been&exposed&to&multiple&cultures&differ&in&their&cultural&experiences,&cultural&
identities,&and&adaptation&to&foreign&cultures.&&A&survey&of&multicultural&business&
students&found&that&those&who&first&moved&to&a&foreign&country&at&a&relatively&
younger&age&and&moved&to&relatively&more&countries&over&their&lives&constituted&a&
distinct&subset&of&multicultural&individuals.&Labeling&these&individuals&“globals”,&we&
found&that&they&were&less&likely&to&identify&with&cultural&groups&and&less&culturally&
adaptive.&These&results&suggest&that&there&is&no&single&type&of&“multiculturalism”,&and&
that&having&more&and&earlier&multicultural&experiences&does&not&necessarily&predict&
better&adaptation&outcomes.&More&nuanced&examination&of&multicultural&individuals’&
past&experiences&and&psychology&is&needed&to&understand&how&they&can&better&
leverage&their&skills&as&global&leaders.&&
Running&head:&Global&Multiculturals&
&
Forthcoming&in&International&Studies&in&Management&and&Organization&2013&&
Special&Issue:&“Advancing&the&Field—New&Directions&for&Global&Mobility”&
&
)
Kathrin&J.&Hanek&is&a&doctoral&candidate&in&the&Department&of&Psychology&at&The&
University&of&Michigan,&530&Church&St.,&Ann&Arbor,&MI&48109,&U.S.A.;&tel.:&734_647_
6787;&e_mail:&khanek@umich.edu.&Fiona&Lee&is&Professor&of&Psychology&at&The&
University&of&Michigan,&530&Church&St.,&Ann&Arbor,&MI&48109,&U.S.A.;&tel.:&734_763_
3358;&e_mail:&fionalee@umich.edu.&Mary&Yoko&Brannen&is&Professor&of&International&
Business&at&The&University&of&Victoria,&3800&Finnerty&Drive,&Victoria,&BC&V8P&5C2,&
Canada;&tel:&250_721_4445;&email:&maryyoko@uvic.ca.&
Global&Multiculturals&2!
!
Individual)Differences)Among)Global/Multicultural)Individuals:)Cultural)
Experiences,)Identity,)and)Adaptation&
)
)
The&experience&of&living&in&multiple&countries&is&not&only&becoming&
increasingly&common,&but&is&a&fact_of_life&for&many&managers&and&members&of&
multinational&organizations.&Carlos&Ghosn,&CEO&of&Nissan&and&Renault,&is&of&
Lebanese&descent,&was&born&in&Brazil,&has&lived&in&Lebanon,&studied&in&France,&and&
resides&part_time&in&Japan&and&France&(INSEAD&2008).&Corporate&rivals&Coca_Cola&
and&PepsiCo&both&have&Chief&Executive&Officers&who&exemplify&multicultural&or&
global&backgrounds:&Turkish_American&Muhtar&Kent&and&Indian_American&Indra&
Nooyi,&respectively.&
There&is&a&growing&segment&of&multicultural&individuals&who,&like&Ghosn,&
Kent,&and&Nooyi,&are&familiar&with&and&competent&in&!"#$%&#'&cultures.&While&the&
psychological&and&managerial&literatures&have&long&explored&multiculturals&such&as&
immigrants&or&expatriates,&recent&research&has&noted&a&new&demographic&of&
multiculturals&who&possess&a&more&complex&cultural&identity&(Berry&1990;&Sussman&
2000).&This&new&research&includes,&but&is&not&limited&to,&work&on&$(%)*+,"#$")'+-%*.+
/012.34&&“people&who&have&spent&a&significant&part&of&their&developmental&years&
outside&their&parents’&culture,”&(Pollock&and&Van&Reken&2009,&13);&5#678#+
,6.!6&6#%$89.,&&“a&talented&population&of&highly&educated,&multilingual&people&that&
have&lived,&worked,&and&studied&for&extensive&periods&in&different&cultures”&(Brimm&
2010,&4);&,"#$")8#+96!8*.,&individuals&who&“feel&at&home&everywhere&and&nowhere”&
Global&Multiculturals&3!
!
(Isogai,&Hayashi,&and&Uno&1999,&493);+7%,"#$")8#+!8)5%98#.,&“individuals&who&have&
internalized&more&than&one&culture,&yet&do&not&identify&strongly&with&either&or&any&of&
them”,&(Fitzsimmons,&Lee,&and&Brannen&2010,&3):+or&,"#$")8##;+(6!'#'..+%9*%<%*"8#.4+
“individuals&of&mixed&ethnic&and/or&cultural&background&living&within&a&framework&
of&experiences,&feelings,&and&thoughts&that&do&not&belong&to&any&single&racial,&ethnic,&
or&cultural&reference&group….(who)&lack&a&cultural&home”&(Vivero&and&Jenkins&1999,&
12_13).&&
Importantly,&there&are&differences&between&these&conceptualizations&of&
multicultural&individuals.&For&example,&research&on&TCKs&and&the&culturally&
homeless&focused&on&formative&childhood&experiences,&examining&individuals&who&
have&lived&in&multiple&countries&early&on&in&their&lives&(Hoersting&and&Jenkins&2011;&
Vivero&and&Jenkins&1999).&Meanwhile,&other&research&has&focused&on&subjective&
cultural&identityor&sense&of&belonging&in&different&cultural&groupsrather&than&
actual&living&experiences&(Berry&1980;&Ting_Toomey&et&al.&2000).&Indeed,&there&are&
many&questions&about&whether&and&how&such&differences&matter.&For&instance,&does&
it&make&a&difference&whether&cultural&exposuree.g.,&living&in&a&foreign&countryis&
experienced&during&one’s&formative&years&versus&later&in&one’s&life?&Does&it&matter&
whether&one&is&exposed&to&only&a&single&foreign&culture&rather&than&to&several&
foreign&cultures?&Do&objective&cultural&experiences&over&one’s&lifetime&relate&to&
subjective&cultural&identity&and&adaptation?&
The&aim&of&this&article&is&to&provide&initial&data&to&address&these&questions.&
We&examine&the&67=',$%<'&,"#$")8#+'>&')%'9,'.&and&the&."7=',$%<'+.'9.'+6?+,"#$")8#+
%*'9$%$;&among&multicultural&individuals&to&investigate&the&key&dimensions&on&which&
Global&Multiculturals&4!
!
they&differ.&We&also&examine&multicultural&individuals&differ&on&cultural&adaptation&
(Sussman&2011).&Another&aim&of&this&article&is&to&integrate&recent&psychological&
investigations&of&multiculturals&to&the&managerial&literature&on&global&leadership.&&
1"#$")8#+'>&')%'9,'.+
We&suggest&that&two&factorsdeep&cultural&experiences&that&(a)&incorporate&
!"#$%&#'&cultural&groups,&and&(b)&began&'8)#;&in&life&before&the&sense&of&self&was&fully&
formed—may&predict&distinct&psychological&processes&among&multiculturals.&There&
is&psychological&evidence&showing&that&people&who&belong&to&multiple&cultural&
groups&process&cultural&cues&in&more&complex&and&dynamic&ways&(Benet_Martinez,&
Leu,&Lee,&and&Morris&2002).&For&example,&Hong,&Morris,&Chiu,&and&Benet_Martinez&
(2000)&found&that&Asian_American&biculturals&engage&in&“cultural&frame&switching”&
where&they&exhibit&different&culturally_stereotypical&behaviors&depending&on&the&
situation.&Subsequent&studies&found&that&this&process&is&moderated&by&subjective&
perceptions&of&compatibility&between&cultural&groups&(Cheng,&Lee,&and&Benet_
Martinez&2006;&Cheng&and&Lee&in&press).&In&short,&external&cultural&cues&interact&
with&internal&perceptions&about&cultures&to&affect&multiculturals’&cognitive&
processes.&
These&processes&are&likely&to&be&exponentially&more&complex&for&individuals&
exposed&to&three&or&more&cultural&groups&(Roccas&and&Brewer&2002).&While&
biculturals&move&between&two&cultures,&individuals&who&have&had&deep&experiences&
with&three&or&more&cultures&will&have&to&choose&between&many&more&cultural&frames&
in&any&given&situation.&Similarly,&while&biculturals&are&affected&by&their&perceptions&
of&compatibility&between&their&two&cultural&groups,&individuals&who&have&lived&in&
Global&Multiculturals&5!
!
three&or&more&cultures&are&affected&by&many&more&inter_relationships&between&
cultural&groups;&multiculturals&exposed&to&three,&four,&or&even&five&cultural&groups&
are&managing&three,&six,&or&even&ten&inter_group&relationships&respectively.&In&short,&
the&basic&psychological&processes&underlying&the&management&of&three&or&more&
cultural&groups&may&be&fundamentally&more&complex&and&more&dynamic&than&that&of&
managing&one&or&even&two&cultural&groups.&As&such,&we&suggest&that&it&is&important&
to&differentiate&between&individuals&based&on&the&9"!7')&of&cultures&to&which&they&
have&had&deep&exposure.&
Second,&the&age&when&one&first&encounters&deep&exposure&to&foreign&cultures&
can&also&be&important.&Psychological&theory&suggests&that&adolescence&(typically&
ending&at&age&19)&is&considered&a&time&when&rising&self_consciousness&and&cognitive&
capacities&enable&individuals&to&think&abstractly&about&their&identitywho&they&are,&
and&how&they&are&“situated”&in&the&social&environment&(Baumeister&1986).&We&
suggest&that&there&might&be&important&differences&between&individuals&who&were&
first&exposed&to&multiple&cultures&before&and&after&this&critical&identity_formation&
period.&&
Individuals&who&are&exposed&to&many&different&cultures&as&children&or&
adolescents&may&be&moving&abroad&during&a&critical&period&when&they&are&still&in&the&
process&of&forming&a&clear&sense&of&self&based&on&their&belongingness&to&a&cultural&
group&(Brannen,&Garcia,&and&Thomas&2009;&Fail,&Thompson,&and&Walker&2004).&
While&such&experiences&can&assist&in&the&development&of&one’s&global&or&
international&career&(Vance&2005),&these&experiences&can&also&lead&to&a&type&of&
cultural&homelessness&or&rootlessness,&which&may&reinforce&the&psychological&
Global&Multiculturals&6!
!
difficulties&in&balancing&and&prioritizing&between&different&cultural&groups&(Phinney&
and&Devich_Navarro&1997).&Indeed,&a&recent&study&showed&that&teenage&children&of&
expatriates&were&less&interested&in&cultural&differences&than&their&adult&parents,&
presumably&because&their&own&cultural&identity&is&still&in&flux&(Weeks,&Weeks,&and&
Willis_Muller&2010).&This&literature&suggests&that&it&may&be&important&to&
differentiate&between&individuals&based&on&the&85'&when&they&first&experienced&deep&
exposure&to&another&culture.&
Overall,&we&suggest&that&individuals&who&have&been&exposed&to&multiple&
foreign&cultures&(two&or&more)&during&the&early,&formative&years&of&their&lives&(i.e.,&
before&age&19)&will&have&distinctive&psychological&characteristics.&For&the&purpose&of&
this&article,&we&label&individuals&with&these&two&characteristics&as&“globals”.&&
Hypothesis&1:&“Globals”&are&distinct&from&other&multiculturals&by&(a)&having&
deep&exposure&to&multiple&cultures&(two&or&more&foreign&cultures),&that&(b)&began&in&
their&early,&formative&years&(before&age&19).&
1"#$")8#+@*'9$%$;+
Cultural&identity&refers&to&the&subjective&sense&of&belongingness&people&feel&
towards&a&cultural&group&(Berry&1980).&Cultural&identity&differs&from&cultural&
experiences&insofar&that&individuals&and&organizations&who&have&experiences&
operating&in&another&culture&do&not&necessarily&feel&that&they&belong&in&that&culture&
(Adler&and&Bartholomew&1992;&Phinney&and&Devich_Navarro&1997;&Sussman&2000&
and&2002;&Ting_Toomey&et&al.&2000).&For&example,&Berry&(1990)&found&that&
immigrants&who&operate&in&two&cultures&can&have&different&patterns&of&cultural&
identification:&.'&8)8$'*&individuals&identify&with&the&home&but&not&the&host&culture;&
Global&Multiculturals&7!
!
8..%!%#8$'*&individuals&identify&with&the&host&but&not&the&home&culture;&%9$'5)8$'*&
individuals&identify&with&both&cultures;&and&!8)5%98#.&do&not&identify&with&either&
culture.&Although&marginal&individuals&do&not&identify&with&any&cultural&group,&they&
remain&competent&at&working&and&living&in&multiple&cultures&(e.g.,&Fitzsimmons,&Lee,&
and&Brannen&2010). &
Indeed,&recent&studies&&suggest&that&“globals”,&or&individuals&who&have&been&
exposed&to&multiple&cultures&starting&at&an&early&age,&may&not&identify&with&any&
cultural&group&(e.g.,&Brannen,&Garcia,&and&Thomas&2009;&Thomas,&Brannen,&and&
Garcia&2011).&“Globals”,&like&TCKs&or&culturally&homeless&individuals,&“frequently&
build&relationships&to&all&of&the&cultures,&while&not&having&full&ownership&in&any”&
(Pollock&and&Van&Reken&2009,&13).&Their&cultural&experiences&are&characterized&by&
restlessness&and&rootlessness,&a&“sense&of&simultaneously&belonging&‘everywhere&
and&nowhere’”&(Pollock&and&Van&Reken&2009,&23).&&
Hypothesis&2:&Compared&to&other&multiculturals,&“globals”&(or&individuals&
exposed&to&two&or&more&foreign&cultures&starting&early&in&life),&have&(a)&low&levels&of&
identification&with&cultural&groups,&or&(b)&a&marginal&cultural&identity.&
A*8&$8$%69+$6+B6)'%59+1"#$")'.+
Cultural&adaptation,&or&the&motivation/ability&to&adjust&one’s&thinking,&
feelings,&and&behaviors&to&a&new&culture,&is&an&important&predictor&of&effective&
performance&in&global&settings&(Halsberger&2005a;&Thomas&and&Lazarova&2006).&For&
example,&individuals&who&actively&engage&in&learning&about&and&adapting&to&foreign&
cultures&are&more&successful&in&international&assignments&(Black&1988;&Shaffer&and&
Harrison&2001).&&
Global&Multiculturals&8!
!
There&is&psychological&evidence&suggesting&that&individuals&with&exposure&to&
more&cultures&may&be&more&culturally&adaptive.&For&example,&people&who&are&
exposed&to&and&identify&with&multiple&cultures&think&about&culture&in&more&
cognitively&complex&ways,&and&have&more&culturally_diverse&social&networks&(Benet_
Martinez,&Lee,&and&Leu&2006;&Tadmor,&Tetlock,&and&Peng&2009).&This&in&turn&can&
facilitate&better&cultural&adaptation&and&advancement&in&multinational&corporations&
(Gillespie,&Riddle,&and&McBride&2010;&Sussman&2002).&&
However,&exposure&to&multiple&cultures&can&also&inhibit&cultural&adaptation.&
Brannen&and&Lee&(in&press)&argue&that&individuals&who&identify&with&multiple&
cultures&have&lower&perceptual&acuity&or&awareness&of&cultural&differences,&which&
can&decrease&cultural&adaptation.&Individuals&who&have&lived&and&worked&effectively&
in&multiple&cultures&may&be&less&likely&to&attend&to&and&understand&different&cultural&
environments&because&they&perceive&cultural&differences&as&easy&to&bridge&and&
unproblematic.&This&lowered&awareness&of&deep_seated&and&ingrained&cultural&
differences&in&turn&inhibits&cultural&adaptation&(Thomas&and&Lazarova&2006).&
Supporting&this&idea,&individuals&who&identify&with&multiple&cultures&have&been&
shown&to&be&less&culturally&adaptive,&behaving&and&communicating&in&less&culturally_
appropriate&ways&(Lee&2010).&&
Similar&findings&have&emerged&in&studies&of&young&individuals&in&their&
identity_formative&years.&A&recent&study&showed&that&college&students&who&have&
lived&abroad&for&an&extended&period&of&time&were&less&open&to&and&aware&of&other&
cultural&values&and&influences&than&students&who&never&traveled&abroad&(Cheng,&
Clerkin,&Lee,&and&Dries&2011).&Without&a&well_developed,&mature&cultural&identity&
Global&Multiculturals&9!
!
themselves,&these&students&might&oversimplify&cultural&differences,&leading&to&
lowered&attention&to&cultural&differences&and&lowered&desire&to&adapt&to&other,&
foreign&cultures&(Sanchez_Burks,&Lee,&Nisbett,&and&Ybarra&2007).&Another&study&
showed&that&expatriate&teenagers,&unlike&expatriate&adults,&were&more&interested&in&
making&friends&than&learning&about&and&understanding&a&foreign&culture.&For&
example,&one&said:&“(my&parents)&are&adapting&to&the&culture&and&I’m&adapting&to&the&
different&kind&of&friends&I’m&developing.&Instead&of&all&Americans,&I’m&establishing&
friends&from&different&countries”&(Weeks,&Weeks,&and&Willis_Muller&2010,&38).&These&
studies&suggest&that&“globals”,&or&individuals&who&were&exposed&to&multiple&cultures&
starting&at&a&young&age,&may&have&lower&levels&of&adaptation&to&foreign&cultures.&&
Hypothesis&3:&Compared&to&other&individuals&exposed&to&foreign&cultures,&
“globals”&(or&individuals&exposed&to&two&or&more&foreign&cultural&groups&early&on&in&
life)&will&show&lower&levels&of&adaptation&to&foreign&cultures.&
METHOD&
C8)$%,%&89$.+
Our&hypotheses&examine&differences&between&“globals”&and&other&
multiculturals.&We&tested&our&hypotheses&using&a&sample&of&MBA&students&from&the&
main&campus&of&an&international&business&school.&This&business&school,&which&has&
campuses&across&multiple&continents&and&affiliations&with&other&business&schools&
around&the&world,&is&well_known&for&drawing&students&with&highly&international&and&
diverse&backgrounds.&The&MBA&student&body,&thus,&provided&a&good&match&of&the&
demographic&group&that&is&of&primary&interest&to&the&present&study—specifically,&
Global&Multiculturals&10!
!
individuals&who&are&on&the&“high&end”&of&the&cultural&experiences&continuum&with&
exposure&to&multiple&cultures&throughout&their&lives.&&
Ninety_nine&MBA&students&(75&percent&male;&average&age&28.6,&DE&=&2.14),&
who&indicated&that&they&have&lived&in&a&foreign&country,&filled&out&a&survey.&The&
sample&was&culturally&diverse,&representing&36&different&nationalities&spanning&five&
continents.&Of&the&99&participants,&92&percent&were&living&outside&their&home&culture&
at&the&time&the&study&was&conducted.&Ninety_three&percent&of&the&participants&
reported&having&prior&experience&working&overseas.&Thirty_one&percent&of&the&
participants&listed&their&prior&occupation&before&entering&business&school&as&
management&consultant,&the&largest&occupational&group&in&our&sample.&Other&
occupations&included,&among&others,&banking,&finance,&automotive,&oil&and&gas&
industries.&The&average&reported&income&of&the&participants&was&65,244&Euros&(DE&=&
25,736).&
F'8.")'.+
& Participants&completed&a&survey&measuring&the&variables&listed&below.&&
1"#$")8#+G>&')%'9,'..&Participants&reported&how&many&foreign&countries&they&
had&lived&in&(not&traveled&to),&their&age&when&they&moved&to&each&of&these&countries,&
and&how&long&they&lived&in&each&country.&+
1"#$")8#+@*'9$%$;.&Following&previous&studies&on&cultural&identities&of&
biculturals&and&multiculturals&(Benet_Martinez,&Leu,&Lee,&and&Morris&2002;&Cheng,&
Lee,&and&Benet_Martinez&2006),&we&asked&participants&to&indicate&their&home&culture&
and&their&“host”&culture&(another&country&with&which&they&identify).&For&each&
culture,&participants&rated&their&agreement&with&the&following&items&using&a&5_point&
Global&Multiculturals&11!
!
Likert&scale&from&1&(not&at&all)&to&5&(very&much):&“To&what&extent&do&you&identify&
with&this&country?”:&“To&what&extent&are&your&values&the&same&as&this&country?”;&and&
“To&what&extent&is&your&worldview&the&same&as&this&country?”.&While&longer&scales&
exist,&these&items&have&been&shown&to&correlate&highly&with&longer&measures&of&
cultural&identification,&and&to&predict&culturally_relevant&behaviors&including&
attributional&tendencies,&cultural&ingroup&favoritism,&self_construals,&and&relational&
patterns&(Cheng&and&Lee&2009;&Nguyen&and&Benet_Martinez&2007).&The&three&items&
were&averaged&to&form&two&composite&scores&measuring&identification&with&home&(α&
=&.73)&and&host&culture&(α&=&.80)&respectively.+
A*8&$8$%69H+Previous&research&has&developed&multiple&scales&to&measure&
adaptation.&Sussman&(2002),&for&example,&measured&cognitive,&affective,&and&
behavioral&cultural&adaptation&using&a&29_item&scale.&Lin&and&Malhotra&(2011)&used&
three&items&to&measure&cultural&adaptation—whether&individuals&are&motivated&to&
understand,&make&adjustments,&and&learn&from&other&cultures&(α’s&>&.70&in&multiple&
samples).&In&the&present&study,&we&used&the&three&items&from&Lin&and&Malhotra’s&
(2011)&scale,&but&also&incorporated&items&that&tap&into&other&components&of&cultural&
adaptation,&such&as&“making&friends’”and&“language&proficiency”&(Halsberger&2005b;&
Sussman&2002).&+
In&all,&participants&rated&a&foreign&culture&they&had&lived&in&on&six&items&using&
a&5_point&Likert&scale&from&1&(not&at&all)&to&5&(very&much):&“To&what&extent&did&you&
adapt&your&thoughts&to&this&culture?”;&“To&what&extent&did&you&adapt&your&behaviors&
to&this&culture?”;&“To&what&extent&did&you&learn&about&this&culture?”;&“To&what&extent&
did&you&learn&the&language&of&this&culture?”;&“To&what&extent&did&you&interact&socially&
Global&Multiculturals&12!
!
with&people&from&this&culture?”;&and&“To&what&extent&were&you&exposed&to&media&
(television,&radio,&newspapers,&etc.)&in&this&culture?”.&These&six&ratings&were&
internally&reliable&(α&=&.82),&and&averaged&to&form&a&composite&adaptation&score.&
RESULTS&
1"#$")8#+G>&')%'9,'..&We&first&examined&whether&multiculturals&can&be&
meaningfully&classified&based&on&the&number&of&foreign&countries&they&have&lived&in&
and&the&age&at&which&they&first&moved&to&a&foreign&culture.&Using&SPSS,&a&two_step&
cluster&analysis&based&on&these&two&variables&identified&four&clusters.&This&solution&
was&good&(average&silhouette&=&0.6).&The&dendrogram&showed&that&the&four_cluster&
solution&best&characterized&the&data.&We&then&conducted&a&K_means&clustering&
analysis&with&the&standardized&variables&(number&of&foreign&countries&lived&in&and&
age&at&first&move)&in&which&a&four_cluster&solution&was&specified.&Ninety&participants&
were&classified&into&the&same&clusters&by&these&two&cluster&analyses;&only&these&
participants&were&included&in&the&subsequent&analyses.+
Table&1&displays&descriptive&statistics&for&the&final&four_cluster&solution.&
Cluster&1&included&participants&who&moved&when&they&were&relatively&older&(F&=&
22.12,&DE&=&2.76)&but&lived&in&relatively&fewer&foreign&countries&(F&=&1.00,&DE&=&.00);&
Cluster&2&represented&participants&who&moved&when&they&were&relatively&older&(F&=&
20.85,&DE&=&3.30)&and&lived&in&relatively&more&foreign&countries&(F&=&3.11,&DE&=&
1.55);&Cluster&3&consisted&of&participants&who&moved&when&they&were&relatively&
younger&(F&=&8.00,&DE&=&1.41)&and&lived&in&relatively&fewer&foreign&countries&(F&=&
1.00,&DE&=&.00);&and&Cluster&4&was&comprised&of&participants&who&were&relatively&
younger&when&they&moved&(F&=&4.54,&DE&=&3.57)&and&lived&in&relatively&more&foreign&
Global&Multiculturals&13!
!
countries&(F&=&3.92,&DE&=&1.12).&As&Table&1&shows,&Cluster&4&describes&what&we&
labeled&“globals”,&individuals&who&first&moved&to&a&foreign&country&at&a&younger&age&
and&have&lived&in&more&foreign&countries.&This&analysis&suggests&that&“globals”&
represent&a&distinct&group&among&a&broader&sample&of&multiculturals.&Overall,&these&
results&support&Hypothesis&1.&&
[INSERT&TABLE&1&ABOUT&HERE]&
1"#$")8#+@*'9$%$;H&Hypothesis&2&predicted&that&“globals”,&or&those&classified&
into&Cluster&4,&would&have&lower&cultural&identification&with&different&cultural&
groups&or&a&marginal&cultural&identity.&All&90&participants&provided&ratings&of&
identification&with&their&home&culture,&and&57&participants&also&provided&ratings&of&
identification&with&their&host&culture.&Two&one_way&analyses&of&variance&were&
conducted&comparing&identification&with&home&and&host&cultures&across&the&four&
clusters.&The&results&are&displayed&in&Table&2.&The&omnibus&test&was&marginally&
significant&for&identification&with&home&culture&(B(3,&86)&=&2.32,&&+=&.08),&and&not&
significant&for&identification&with&host&culture.&To&test&our&prediction&that&“globals”&
have&a&lower&level&of&cultural&identification&than&the&other&three&groups,&we&
performed&a&focused&contrast&(using&the&contrast&weights&of&_3,&1,&1,&1).&The&contrast&
was&significant&for&identification&with&home&culture&($(86)&=&2.16,&&&<&.05),&and&
marginally&significant&for&identification&with&host&culture&($(53)&=&1.72,&&&=&.09).&The&
means&were&in&the&predicted&direction,&providing&partial&support&for&Hypothesis&2.&+
[INSERT&TABLE&2&ABOUT&HERE]&
Next,&we&categorized&the&57&participants&that&provided&identification&of&home&
and&host&cultures&into&four&groups,&depending&on&whether&they&scored&relatively&
Global&Multiculturals&14!
!
higher&or&lower&on&each&of&the&two&identification&measures&(using&median&splits&on&
home&and&host&identification—3.67&and&3.0,&respectively).&As&Table&3&shows,&a&low_
low&identification&pattern&(marginal&cultural&identity)&was&the&most&common&
identification&type&among&“globals”.&While&45&percent&of&“globals”&had&a&marginal&
cultural&identity,&only&17&percent&of&other&participantsindividuals&in&Clusters&1,&2,&
and&3—had&a&marginal&cultural&identity,&χ2(1)&=&3.97,&&&<&.05.&These&results&were&also&
consistent&with&Hypothesis&2.&
[INSERT&TABLE&3&ABOUT&HERE]&
A*8&$8$%69.&One_way&analyses&of&variance&were&conducted&comparing&
“globals”&with&other&participants&on&measures&of&adaptation.&The&omnibus&results,&
shown&in&Table&2,&found&significant&effects&for&adaptation&of&thought&(B(3,&86)&=&3.54,&
&&<&.05),&behavior&(B(3,&86)&=&8.09,&&&<&.001),&and&learning&the&culture&(B(3,&85)&=&
3.56,&&&<&.05).&The&adaptation&composite&variable,&averaged&over&all&the&adaptation&
items,&was&also&significant&(B(3,&86)&=&2.94,&&&<&.05).&+
Again,&focused&contrasts&were&conducted&examining&the&prediction&that&
“globals”&have&lower&levels&of&adaptation&than&other&groups.&The&effect&was&
significant&for&the&adaptation&composite&variable&($(86)&=&2.79,&&&<&.01),&as&well&as&for&
the&specific&items&tapping&into&adaptation&of&thought&($(86)&=&2.98,&&&<&.01),&behavior&
($(86)&=&4.90,&&&<&.001),&and&learning&of&the&foreign&culture&($(85)&=&3.16,&&&<&.01).&
The&means&were&in&the&predicted&direction,&supporting&Hypothesis&3.&To&examine&
whether&the&observed&effects&were&due&to&“globals”&first&moving&to&a&foreign&culture&
at&a&younger&age&than&other&multiculturals,&we&examined&the&correlation&between&
Global&Multiculturals&15!
!
the&adaptation&composite&and&age&of&first&move&in&our&sample;&the&correlation&
coefficient&was&not&significant&()&=&.088,&&&=&.41).&&
DISCUSSION&
In&today’s&global&economy,&people&with&so_called&global&experiences&and&
mindsets&are&often&perceived&as&effective&leaders&in&multinational&corporations.&
These&individuals&presumably&have&more&knowledge&about&multiple&cultures,&and&
can&leverage&this&knowledge&to&manage&teams&and&make&decisions&on&a&global&scale.&
Indeed,&there&has&been&a&growing&body&of&research&in&both&the&psychological&and&
management&literatures&showing&that,&compared&to&“monocultural”&individuals,&
those&with&multicultural&backgrounds&have&unique&skills&and&capabilities,&and&think&
about&culture&in&different&ways&(Brannen&and&Lee&in&press).&&&
Using&quantitative&data&from&a&survey,&our&findings&show&that&clear&
differences&exist&among&multiculturals.&We&first&found&that&there&is&a&distinct&group&
of&individuals&who&have&experienced&deep&exposure&to&two&or&more&foreign&cultures&
during&their&lives&beginning&at&an&early&age.&We&labeled&these&individuals&“globals”.&
Further,&we&found&that&“globals”&are&more&likely&to&have&a&marginal&cultural&identity&
where&they&do&not&identify&strongly&either&with&their&home&or&host&cultures.&Similar&
to&previous&research&on&TCKs,&the&cultural&homeless,&or&bicultural&marginals,&these&
individuals&do&not&feel&that&they&belong&in&any&one&culture.&Although&early&work&on&
immigrants&and&biculturals&implies&that&a&marginal&cultural&identity&can&be&
problematic,&more&recent&work&suggests&otherwise&(Berry&1990;&Roccas&and&Brewer&
2002).&For&example,&those&with&marginal&cultural&identities&exist&in&a&perpetual&state&
of&“experiential&angst”&that&in&turn&promotes&cognitive&complexity,&perceptual&acuity,&
Global&Multiculturals&16!
!
mindfulness,&and&flexible&thinking,&skills&that&are&important&for&effective&global&
leadership&(Fitzsimmons,&Lee,&and&Brannen&2010;&Brannen,&Garcia,&and&Thomas&
2009).&&
We&further&found&that&“globals”&are&#'..&adaptive&to&foreign&cultures.&This&
seems&rather&counter_intuitive&at&first&glance—multicultural&exposure&has&been&a&
fact&of&life&for&“globals”&since&adolescence&or&earlier,&and&one&might&assume&that&they&
will&be&more&motivated&and&able&to&adjust&their&behaviors&depending&on&changing&
cultural&contexts.&For&one,&it&may&be&that&early&cultural&exposure&experienced&by&
“globals”&made&adaptation&to&foreign&cultures&more&difficult.&Teenage&children&of&
expatriates&have&been&shown&to&be&less&interested&in&learning&about&foreign&cultures&
than&their&parents.&These&multicultural&teenagers&had&other&preoccupations&that&
might&have&overshadowed&their&motivation&and&ability&to&adapt,&such&as&making&
friends&regardless&of&the&friends’&cultural&backgrounds&(Weeks,&Weeks,&and&Willis_
Muller&2010).&Second,&having&extensive&multicultural&experiences&might&have&
instilled&a&sense&of&overconfidence&in&one’s&cultural&skills,&which&in&turn&leads&to&
lowered&motivation&to&attend&and&adapt&to&cultural&differences.&Third,&superficial&
engagement,&attachment,&and&adaptation&to&foreign&cultures&may&serve&as&a&coping&
mechanism&for&“globals”&to&manage&their&constant&moving.&In&short,&rather&than&
learning&about&and&assimilating&into&a&foreign&culture,&disengagement&may&actually&
be&more&“adaptive”.&This&suggests&that&a&more&nuanced&and&complex&definition&of&
adaptation&may&be&needed&to&account&for&the&finding&that&early&and&sustained&
cultural&exposure&may&have&possible&downsides&for&cultural&adaptation.&&
Global&Multiculturals&17!
!
It&is&important&to&note&that&the&present&study&examines&the&psychology&of&
multicultural&individuals&only,&focusing&on&individuals&at&the&very&high&end&of&the&
cultural&exposure&continuum.&We&only&sampled&MBA&students&in&an&international&
business&school.&Therefore,&one&should&keep&in&mind&that&our&sample&is&not&
representative&of&all&individuals&with&multicultural&experiences,&and&to&be&cautious&
not&to&draw&inferences&beyond&the&characteristics&of&our&particular&sample.&That&
said,&this&study&raises&important&avenues&for&future&research.&While&we&examined&
adaptation&as&an&important&outcome&variable,&there&are&many&more&global&
management&and&leadership&capabilities&that&should&be&included&in&future&research,&
such&as&cultural&intelligence,&creativity,&and&perceptual&acuity,&to&name&a&few.&
Although&“globals”&may&be&less&adaptive,&they&might&be&developing&these&skills&that&
can&be&important&for&global,&multinational&leadership&(Vance,&2005).&Relatedly,&the&
views&of&practicing&managers&would&add&an&important&dimension&beyond&those&of&
business&school&students,&as&would&assessments&beyond&participants’&self_reports&to&
include&other&measures&of&performance&such&as&supervisor&ratings&and&actual&job&
outcomes.&&
Further,&future&studies&need&to&investigate&the&cultural&experiences&of&
multicultural&individuals&more&deeply.&“Globals”&may&differ&from&other&
multiculturals&in&a&number&of&life&experiences&besides&the&number&of&cultures&they&
have&been&exposed&to&and&the&age&at&which&cultural&exposure&first&occurred.&For&
example,&“globals”&who&may&have&moved&at&a&younger&age&because&of&their&parents’&
occupation&rather&than&their&own&choice,&and&thus&more&likely&to&experience&
exposure&to&foreign&cultures&as&an&involuntary&process.&In&addition,&studies&that&
Global&Multiculturals&18!
!
longitudinally&track&cultural&identification&over&the&lifespan&can&provide&a&rigorous&
test&of&how&age&at&which&cultural&exposure&occurs&impacts&identity&and&adaptation.&
Also,&our&focus&was&on&the&&)'.'9$&experiences&of&multiculturals.&More&research&is&
needed&to&examine&the&&8.$,&?6)!8$%<'&cultural&experiences&of&multiculturals.&Lastly,&
more&studies&are&needed&to&account&for&how&the&cultures&to&which&individuals&have&
been&exposed&differ&from&one&another.&For&example,&an&individual&who&has&lived&in&
England,&U.S.,&and&Canada—all&highly&developed&economies&with&prototypically&
Western&cultural&valuesarguably&would&have&different&cultural&experiences&than&
one&who&has&lived&in&Germany,&India,&and&Argentina.&&
CONCLUSION&
In&this&article,&we&use&the&term&“globals”&to&describe&individuals&who&have&had&
exposure&to&multiple&foreign&cultures&starting&at&an&early&age.&We&found&that&
“globals”&constitute&a&distinct&group&of&multiculturals,&and&that&they&are&more&likely&
to&have&a&marginal&cultural&identity.&Interestingly,&“globals”&show&#6I')&levels&of&
cultural&adaptation&compared&to&other&multiculturals,&challenging&the&idea&that&
extensive&and&early&cultural&exposure&are&unequivocally&beneficial.&This&suggests&
that&it&is&overly&simplistic&to&assume&that&individuals&with&more&multicultural&
experiences&will&have&an&easier&time&adapting&to&a&new&work&role,&project,&or&joint&
venture&in&an&unfamiliar&culture.&&
&
&
&
&
Global&Multiculturals&19!
!
References&
Adler,&N.&J.,&and&S.&Bartholomew.&1992.&“Managing&Globally&Competent&People.”&
A,8*'!;+6?+F8985'!'9$+G>',"$%<'+6&(3):&52_65.&&
Baumeister,&R.&F.&1986.&@*'9$%$;.&New&York:&Oxford&University&Press.&
Benet_Martinez,&V.,&F.&Lee,&and&J.&Leu.&2006.&“Biculturalism&and&Cognitive&Complexity:&
Expertise&in&Cultural&Representations.”&J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+C.;,(6#65;&
37:&386407.&
Benet_Martinez,&V.,&J.&Leu,&F.&Lee,&and&M.&Morris.&2002.&“Negotiating&Biculturalism:&
Cultural&Frame&Switching&in&Biculturals&with&Oppositional&versus&Compatible&
Cultural&Identities.”&J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+C.;,(6#65;+33:&492_516.&
Berry,&J.&W.&1980.&“Acculturation&as&Varieties&of&Adaptation.”&In&A,,"#$")8$%69L+
0('6);4+!6*'#.+89*+.6!'+9'I+?%9*%95.4+ed.&A.&Padilla,&9_25.&Boulder,&CO:&
Westview.&
———.&1990.&“Psychology&of&Acculturation.”&In&1)6..K1"#$")8#+C').&',$%<'.L+
M'7)8.-8+D;!&6.%"!+69+F6$%<8$%694+ed.&J.&Berman,&201–234.&Lincoln,&NE:&
University&of&Nebraska.&
Black,&J.&S.&1988.&“Work&Role&Transitions:&A&Study&of&American&Expatriate&Managers&
in&Japan.”&J6")98#+6?+@9$')98$%698#+N".%9'..+D$"*%'.4+19&(2):&277_94.&
Brannen,&M.&Y.,&and&F.&Lee.&In&press.&“Bridging&Cultural&Divides:&Traversing&
Organizational&and&Psychological&Perspectives&on&Multiculturalism.”&In&
O89*766-+6?+N%,"#$")8#%.!4+eds.&V.&Benet_Martinez&and&Y.&HongH&New&York:&
Oxford&University&Press.&
Global&Multiculturals&20!
!
Brannen,&M.&Y.,&D.&Garcia,&and&D.&C.&Thomas.&2009.&“Biculturals&as&Natural&Bridges&for&
Intercultural&Communication&and&Collaboration.”&Proceeding&of&the&2009&
international&workshop&on&Intercultural&collaboration.&Retrieved&from)
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1499257.&
Brimm,&L.&2010.&P#678#+16.!6&6#%$89.L+0('+1)'8$%<'+G*5'+6?+E%??')'9,'H+INSEAD&
Business&Press.&New&York:&Palgrave&Macmillan.&
Cheng,&C.,&C.&Clerkin,&F.&Lee,&and&E.&Dries.&2011.&“Traveling&Abroad&and&Creative&
Performance:&A&Mediation&Model.”&Unpublished&manuscript,&Singapore&
Management&University.&
Cheng,&C.&Y.,&and&F.&Lee.&2009.&“Multiracial&Identity&Integration:&Perceptions&of&
Conflict&and&Distance&Among&Multiracial&Individuals.”&J6")98#+6?+D6,%8#+@.."'.+
65:&51_68.&
Cheng,&C.&Y.,&and&F.&Lee.&In&press.&“Cognitive&Correlates&of&Biculturalism.”&In&
O89*766-+6?+N%,"#$")8#%.!4+eds.&Y.&Y.&Hong&and&V.&Benet_Martinez.&
Cheng,&C.&Y.,&F.&Lee,&and&V.&Benet_Martinez.&2006.&“Assimilation&and&Contrast&Effects&
in&Cultural&Frame&Switching:&Bicultural&Identity&Integration&and&Valence&of&
Cultural&Cues.”&J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+C.;,(6#65;+37&(6):&742_760.&
Fail,&H.,&J.&Thompson,&and&G.&Walker.&2004.&“Belonging,&Identity,&and&Third&Culture&
Kids:&Life&Histories&of&Former&International&School&Kids.”&J6")98#+6?+Q'.'8),(+
%9+@9$')98$%698#+G*",8$%694+3&(3):&319_338.&
Fitzsimmons,&S.&R.,&Y._t.&Lee,&and&M.&Y.&Brannen.&2010.&“Demystifying&the&Myth&about&
Marginals:&Implications&for&Global&Leadership.”&Paper&presented&at&the&Global&
Leadership&Pre_Conference.&Lausanne,&Switzerland.&
Global&Multiculturals&21!
!
Gillespie,&K.,&L.&Riddle,&and&B.&McBride.&2010.&“Globalization,&Acculturation,&and&Local&
Managers&in&Developing&Countries.”&@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+
F8985'!'9$4+10&(1):&37_53.&
Halsberger,&A.&2005a.&“The&Complexities&of&Expatriate&Adaptation.”&O"!89+Q'.6"),'+
F8985'!'9$+Q'<%'I4+15:&160_180.&
———.&&2005b.&“Facets&and&Dimensions&of&Cross_Cultural&Adaptation:&Refining&the&
Tools.”&C').699'#+Q'<%'I4+34&(1):&85_109.&
Hoersting,&R.&C.,&and&S.&Jenkins.&2011.&“No&Place&to&Call&Home:&Cultural&Homelessness,&
Self_Esteem&and&Cross_Cultural&Identities.”&@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+R?+
@9$'),"#$")8#+Q'#8$%69.,&35&(1):&17_30.&
Hong,&Y._y.,&M.&W.&Morris,&C._y.&Chiu,&and&V.&Benet_Martínez.&2000.&“Multicultural&
Minds:&A&Dynamic&Constructivist&Approach&to&Culture&and&Cognition.”&
A!')%,89+C.;,(6#65%.$4+55&(7):&709_720.&
Isogai,&T.,&Y.&Hayashi,&and&M.&Uno.&1999.&“Identity&Issues&and&Reentry&Training.”&
@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+R?+@9$'),"#$")8#+Q'#8$%69.,&23&(3):&493_525.&
Lee,&Y._t.&2010.&“Home&versus&Host—Identifying&with&Either,&Both&or&Neither?&The&
Relationship&between&Dual&Cultural&Identities&and&Intercultural&
Effectiveness.”&@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+F8985'!'9$4+10:&55_76.&
Lin,&X.,&and&S.&Malhotra.&2011.&“To&Adapt&or&Not&Adapt:&The&Moderating&Effect&of&
Perceived&Similarity&in&Cross_Cultural&Business&Partnerships.”&@9$')98$%698#+
J6")98#+6?+@9$'),"#$")8#+Q'#8$%69.4+36:&118_129.&
Global&Multiculturals&22!
!
Nguyen,&A._M.&D.,&and&V.&Benet_Martínez.&2007.&“Biculturalism&Unpacked:&
Components,&Individual&Differences,&Measurement,&and&Outcomes.”&D6,%8#+
89*+C').698#%$;+C.;,(6#65;+16!&8..4+1:&101_114.&&
Phinney,&J.&S.,&and&M.&Devich_Navarro.&1997.&“Variations&in&Bicultural&Identification&
among&African&American&and&Mexican&American&Adolescents.”&J6")98#+6?+
Q'.'8),(+69+A*6#'.,'9,'4+7:&3–32.&
Pollock,&D.&C.,&and&R.&E.&Van&Reken.&2009.&0(%)*+1"#$")'+2%*.L+P)6I%95+S&+A!695+
T6)#*..&3d&ed.&Boston:&Nicholas&Brealey&Publishing.&
Roccas,&S.,&and&M.&B.&Brewer.&2002.&“Social&Identity&Complexity.”&C').698#%$;+89*+
D6,%8#+C.;,(6#65;+Q'<%'I4+6&(2):&88_106.&
Sanchez_Burks,&J.,&F.&Lee,&R.&Nisbett,&and&O.&Ybarra.&2007.&“Cultural&Training&Based&on&
a&Theory&of&Relational&Ideology.”&N8.%,+89*+A&&#%'*+D6,%8#+C.;,(6#65;4+29&(3):&
257_268.&
Shaffer,&M.&A.,&and&D.&A.&Harrison.&2001.&“Forgotten&Partners&of&International&
Assignments:&Development&and&Test&of&a&Model&of&Spouse&Adjustment.”&
J6")98#+R?+A&&#%'*+C.;,(6#65;,&86&(2):&238_254.&
Sussman,&N.&M.&2000.&“The&Dynamic&Nature&of&Cultural&Identity&throughout&Cultural&
Transitions:&Why&Home&is&not&so&Sweet.”&C').698#%$;+A9*+D6,%8#+C.;,(6#65;+
Q'<%'I4+4&(4):&355_373.&
———.&2002.&“Testing&the&Cultural&Identity&Model&of&the&Cultural&Transition&Cycle:&
Sojourners&Return&Home.”&@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+R?+@9$'),"#$")8#+Q'#8$%69.,&26&
(4):&391_408.&
Global&Multiculturals&23!
!
———.&2011.&“Working&Abroad&and&Expatriate&Adjustment:&Three&Disciplinary&
Lenses&for&Exploring&the&Psychological&Transition&Cycle&of&International&
Employees.”&D6,%8#+89*+C').698#%$;+C.;,(6#65;+16!&8..,&5&(7):&393_409.&
Tadmor,&C.&T.,&P.&E.&Tetlock,&and&K.&Peng.&2009.&“Acculturation&Strategies&and&
Integrative&Complexity:&The&Cognitive&Implications&of&Biculturalism.”&J6")98#+
6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+C.;,(6#65;,&40:&105_139.&
The&Transcultural&Leader:&Carlos&Ghosn,&CEO&of&Renault,&Nissan.&(2008,&May).&
@MDGAE+296I#'*5'.&Retrieved&from&
http://knowledge.insead.edu/ILSTransculturalLeaderGhosn080501.cfm?vid
=45.&
Thomas,&D.&C.,&M.&Y.&Brannen,&and&D.&Garcia.&2011.&“Bicultural&Individuals&and&
Intercultural&Effectiveness.”&G")6&'89+J6")98#+6?+1)6..K1"#$")8#+G??',$%<'9'..+
89*+F8985'!'9$4+1&(4):&315_333.&
Thomas,)D.&C.,&and&M.&B.&Lazarova.&2006.&“Expatriate&Adjustment&and&Performance:&A&
Critical&Review.”&In&O89*766-+6?+)'.'8),(+%9+%9$')98$%698#+("!89+)'.6"),'+
!8985'!'9$4+eds.&G.&Stahl&and&I.&Björkman,&247_264.&&Northampton,&MA:&
Edward&Elgar&Publishing.&
Ting_Toomey,&S.,&K.&K.&Yee_Jung,&R.&B.&Shapiro,&W.&Garcia,&T.&J.&Wright,&and&J.&G.&Oetzel.&
2000.&“Ethnic/Cultural&Identity&Salience&and&Conflict&Styles&in&Four&US&Ethnic&
Groups.”&@9$')98$%698#+J6")98#+R?+@9$'),"#$")8#+Q'#8$%69.,&24&(1):&47_81.&
Vance,&C.&M.&2005.&“The&Personal&Quest&for&Building&Global&Competence:&A&
Taxonomy&of&Self_Initiating&Career&Path&Strategies&for&Gaining&Business&
Experience&Abroad.”&J6")98#+6?+T6)#*+N".%9'..4+40:&374_385.&
Global&Multiculturals&24!
!
Vivero,&V.,&and&S.&Jenkins.&1999.&“Existential&Hazards&of&the&Multicultural&Individual:&
Defining&and&Understanding&'Cultural&Homelessness.'”&1"#$")8#+E%<').%$;+89*+
G$(9%,+F%96)%$;+C.;,(6#65;,&5&(1):&6_26.&
Weeks,&K.&P.,&M.&Weeks,&and&K.&Willis_Muller.&2010.&“The&Adjustment&of&Expatriate&
Teenagers.”&C').699'#+Q'<%'I,&39&(1):&24_43.&
&
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The authors developed and tested a model of spouse adjustment to international assignments in a sequence of qualitative and quantitative investigations. From in-depth interviews with expatriate spouses, half of whom had either positive or negative experiences living abroad, the authors identified several potentially important sources of adjustment. These constructs were integrated with others from identity theory and earlier research on expatriates to develop a conceptual model of spouse adjustment. The model was tested by collecting multisource questionnaire data from 221 international assignee couples working in 37 countries. Correlation and regression analyses revealed several important relationships between individual, interpersonal relationship, and environmental sources of identity, and the adjustment of expatriate spouses.
Article
Full-text available
Biculturals – people who have internalised more than one cultural profile – are an under explored result of globalisation. This new and growing demographic presents some important challenges and opportunities for international management. Our study explores the idea that biculturalism fosters cultural general skills that can be useful in today's multinational organisations. Results indicate that biculturals have more pronounced skills related to intercultural effectiveness than monoculturals, including a higher level cognitive skill called cultural metacognition that directly influences intercultural effectiveness. We also explore the idea that those bicultural individuals who experience conflict in their cultural identity development have higher levels of these skills. We discuss implications of these findings for international management.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose ‐ The purpose of this paper is to develop a model regarding adolescent adjustment issues overseas. Design/methodology/approach ‐ Using previous literature on expatriate adjustment and in-depth interviews with students currently living abroad, a model of expatriate teens' adjustment is developed. Findings ‐ Interviews found that although some issues of adolescent adjustment are similar to expatriate and spouse issues, several were unique. In addition, the interviews suggested that the effective adjustment of the adolescent might lead the expatriate to stay abroad longer than originally planned. Research limitations/implications ‐ Small sample size and limited generalizability form the main limitations of the exercise. Practical implications ‐ Effective predeparture training for all family members is imperative for expatriate success. Originality/value ‐ The papers represent the first comprehensive look at the issues that affect the adjustment of expatriate teens.
Article
Full-text available
Transnational firms need transnational human resource management systems. This article recommends global human resource changes at two levels: individual and systemic. First, it presents a set of skills needed by individual managers to be globally competent, highlighting those which transcend the historic competencies required of expatriate managers. Second, it suggests a framework for assessing the global competence of firms' human resource systems. Based on a survey of fifty major North American firms, the authors find today's human resource strategies to be significantly less global than firms' business strategies. To overcome this gap, they identify a series of illusions preventing firms from creating human resource systems which are sufficiently global to support transnational business strategies.
Article
There is strong evidence that work experience abroad can be very valuable for developing global competencies for career success in today's global economy-whether one's career is at home or abroad. However, career research has been notably silent in providing career models for gaining international experience for developing these competencies. In addition, the international management literature has taken a mostly corporate perspective, with little attention about what individuals can self-initiate to advance their international career interests. This study explores various career path strategies, based on the actual experience of 48 current American expatriates in five major cities in East Asia, for gaining international business experience, which appears to be vital to the development of global competence. The result of this exploratory research is the development of a comprehensive, validated taxonomy or model of "pre-international" career path strategies and activities for gaining international business experience. It is hoped that this work will begin to advance the development of a much neglected line of career research related to self-selected or self-initiated expatriation. This research also can potentially provide useful guidance to individuals as they plan for developing global competence through obtaining foreign work experience.
Article
In this chapter we examine an assumption in the literature on international assignments, the belief in a direct positive relationship between the adjustment of expatriates and their performance. We first outline the historical basis for the overwhelming focus on adjustment. We then review the literature on the conceptualization and measurement of both adjustment and performance and on the adjustment–performance relationship. Finally, we reflect on the state of knowledge of this relationship and discuss implications for future research.
Article
Marginals are a type of bicultural (or multicultural) individual who have internalised more than one culture, yet do not identify strongly with either or any of them; they are simultaneously cultural insiders and outsiders. This duality has led them to be overlooked as positive contributors to organisations. On average, marginals have been found to experience worse psychological, social and adjustment outcomes than other biculturals. However, in this paper, we argue that new evidence challenges this view. We propose a conceptual explanation for the outliers from the average marginalised experience, to contend that under certain conditions, marginals may possess certain advantages that facilitate their potential to excel as global leaders. Full-text: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/7595
Article
This study examined relations between a cross-cultural geographically mobile childhood and adulthood cultural homelessness, attachment to cross-cultural identities, and self esteem. Cross-cultural identities are loosely defined identities (e.g., third culture kids, military brats, missionary kids) that describe some individuals’ childhood cross-cultural experience. The 475 participants spent at least two years before age 18 in a country different from their parents’ home culture, then returned to the latter. They completed an online survey which included general demographic information regarding cross-cultural experiences in childhood, as well as the Cultural Homelessness Criteria, the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale, and items that evaluated the strength of affirmation, belonging, and commitment to a self-labeled cross-cultural identity. Cultural homelessness was related to lower self esteem scores; higher affirmation, belonging and commitment to any cross-cultural identity was related to higher self esteem and lower cultural homelessness. Furthermore, such affirmation, belonging, and commitment buffered the cultural homelessness–self esteem association, whereas just having a cross-cultural identity did not.
Article
This paper describes the development of a theory-based cross-cultural training intervention we call relational ideology training, and reports a field experiment testing its effectiveness in facilitating intercultural collaborations. The intervention was based on Protestant relational ideology (PRI) theory (Sanchez-Burks, 2002) and cross-cultural empirical research derived from this theory. An experiment compared the effectiveness of this novel intervention with the well established cultural assimilator training. Results show that compared to cultural assimilator training, relational ideology training is more effective in improving managers' task performance and affective adjustment in cross-cultural ventures. Important practical and theoretical benefits can be gained from integrating theoretical advances in cultural psychology into cross-cultural training.