No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Phenotypic variability in a family with haemophilia B and prothrombin G20210A
Abstract
1 MacKinlayN,TaperJ,RenissonF,RickardK.Cardiac surgery and catheterization in pa-tients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2000;6: 84–8.2 Stine KC, Becton DL. Use of factor VIIIreplacement during open heart surgery in apatient with haemophilia A. Haemophilia2006; 12: 435–6.3 Tang M, Wierup P, Terp K, Ingerslev J,Sorensen B. Cardiac surgery in patients withhaemophilia. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 101–7.4 Eren A, Friedl R, Hannekum A, Gulbins H.Cardiac surgery in a patient with haemo-philia A. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54:212–4.5 Palanzo DA, Sadr FS. Coronary artery bypassgrafting in a patient with haemophilia B.Perfusion 1995; 10: 265–70.6 Bukowski JG, De Brux JL, Ganascia B, Cot-tineau C, Jacob JP. [Coronary artery bypasswith extracorporeal circulation in a patientwith hemophilia B]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim1996; 15: 304–6.7 Grandmougin D, Delolme M-C, Reynaud J,Barral X. Off-pump myocardial revasculari-zation in a diabetic patient with severehemophilia B and impaired left ventricularfunction: hematological and operative strat-egies. J Card Surg 2005; 20: 366–9.8 Schutgens REG, Tuinenburg A, RoosendaalG, Guyomi SH, Mauser-Bunschoten EP.Treatment of ischaemic heart disease inhaemophilia patients: an institutional guide-line. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 952–8.9 Despotis GJ, Avidan MS, Hogue CW.Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostaticactivation during extracorporeal circulation.Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: S1821–31.10 Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT et al. Benefitsof off-pump bypass on neurologic andclinical morbidity: a prospective random-ized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 18–26.
... The mechanism of action of prothrombin complex concentrates has been debated but non-clinical research suggests that the most important components are FXa and FII [2,4]. It has also been reported that an increase in FII plasma concentration due to the prothrombin mutation G20210A ameliorates haemophilia A and B [5][6][7]. ...
Background:
Haemophilia A and B are treated with FVIII and FIX replacement therapy. Treatment may be complicated by inhibitory antibodies that require bypass therapy such as FEIBA(®) in which prothrombin (FII) is suggested to be the main active component.
Methods:
To evaluate the effect of FII on haemophilia recombinant human (rh) FII (MEDI8111) or plasma-derived human FII (pdhFII) was given as single doses to anaesthetized haemophilia A and B mice 3 min before tail transection and rhFVIII or rhFIX was used for comparison. After tail transection, automatic bleeding registration was used to continuously measure blood loss (BL) and bleeding time (BT). Thrombin generation and plasma concentrations of human FVIII, FIX, FII and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) were measured.
Results:
Blood loss and BT were dose-dependently decreased by rhFVIII or rhFIX. The concentrations that decreased BL and BT for rhFVIII by 50% (EC50) were 0.06 and 0.01 IU mL(-1) and for rhFIX 0.07 and 0.07 IU mL(-1) , respectively. Administration of rhFVIII and rhFIX dose-dependently increased thrombin generation potential but did not affect TAT. MEDI8111 and pdhFII dose-dependently decreased BL and BT in haemophilia A mice, EC50 37 and 87 and 100 and 155 mg L(-1) respectively. In haemophilia B mice given MEDI8111 EC50 was for BL 56 mg L(-1) and for BT 67 mg L(-1) . TAT and thrombin generation increased dose-dependently for MEDI8111 and pdhFII.
Conclusion:
MEDI8111 dose-dependently decreased bleeding and increased procoagulant activity in haemophilia A and B mice and suggest that MEDI8111 may be useful for preventing bleeding in patients with haemophilia A and B.
In the past 50 years, the lifespan of an individual affected with severe hemophilia A has increased from a mere 20 years to near that of the general unaffected population. These advances are the result of and parallel advances in the development and manufacture of replacement therapies. We are now poised to witness further technologic leaps with the development of longer-lasting replacement therapies, some of which are likely to be approved for market shortly. Prophylactic therapy is currently the standard of care for young children with severe hemophilia A, yet requires frequent infusion to achieve optimal results. Longer-lasting products will transform our ability to deliver prophylaxis, especially in very young children. Longer-lasting replacement therapies will require changes to our current treatment plans including those for acute bleeding, prophylaxis, surgical interventions, and even perhaps immunotolerance induction. Ongoing observation will be required to determine the full clinical impact of this new class of products.
Although many examples of unrelated hemophilia A patients carrying identical point mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene have been reported, the clinical phenotype is not always the same among patients sharing the same molecular defect. Possible explanations for this discrepancy include undetected additional mutations in the FVIII gene or coinheritance of mutations at other genetic loci that modulate FVIII function. We report molecular genetic analysis of potential modifying genes in two sets of unrelated patients carrying common FVIII missense mutations but exhibiting different levels of clinical severity. Both mutations (FVIII R1689C and R2209Q) are associated with severe hemophilia A in some patients and mild/moderate disease in others. The common von Willebrand disease type 2N mutation (R91Q) was excluded as a modifying factor in these groups of patients. However, analysis of the recently described factor V (FV) R506Q mutation (leading to activated protein C resistance) identified a correlation of inheritance of this defect with reduced hemophilia A severity. Two moderately affected hemophilia A patients, each with either of two FVIII gene mutations, were heterozygous for FV R506Q, whereas two severely affected patients and two moderately affected patients were homozygous normal at the FV locus. Our results suggest that coinheritance of the FV R506Q mutation may be an important determinant of clinical phenotype in hemophilia A and that modification of the protein C pathway may offer a new strategy for the treatment of FVIII deficiency.
The modulation of disease severity in hemophilia A (HA) patients may be related to the co-inheritance of mutations in genes with a known thrombotic effect such as factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin. In the Spanish population, the prothrombin 20210A (PT20210A) allele is the most prevalent genetic risk factor for venous thromboembolism.
We investigated the presence of both mutations in a cohort of 265 hemophiliac patients divided into two groups: I) 140 unrelated patients with moderate and mild HA and II) 125 unrelated patients with severe HA (83 carrying an inversion of intron 22).
In group I, 4 patients had the FVL (2.8% vs. 2.98% controls) and 5 had the PT20210A (3.6% vs. 6.46% controls). In group II, two patients with inversion had the FVL (1.6%) and PT20210A was found in 10 patients (8%), five of them with inversion of intron 22 without inhibitors. One of these patients had the FVL and PT20210A mutations concomitantly. In the subgroup of patients with inversion who were carriers of the PT20210A, three parameters i.e. spontaneous bleeding (p=0.008), factor VIII utilization (p=0.016) and number of hemophilic arthropathies (p<0.0005) were significantly lower than in a subgroup of 11 age-matched non-PT20210A severe HA patients with inversion and without inhibitors.
These results indicate that the inheritance of PT20210A could be a protective factor that mitigates the clinical severity of HA.
Calibrated automated thrombography displays the concentration of thrombin in clotting plasma with or without platelets (platelet-rich plasma/platelet-poor plasma, PRP/PPP) in up to 48 samples by monitoring the splitting of a fluorogenic substrate and comparing it to a constant known thrombin activity in a parallel, non-clotting sample. Thus, the non-linearity of the reaction rate with thrombin concentration is compensated for, and adding an excess of substrate can be avoided. Standard conditions were established at which acceptable experimental variation accompanies sensitivity to pathological changes. The coefficients of variation of the surface under the curve (endogenous thrombin potential) are: within experiment approximately 3%; intra-individual: <5% in PPP, <8% in PRP; interindividual 15% in PPP and 19% in PRP. In PPP, calibrated automated thrombography shows all clotting factor deficiencies (except factor XIII) and the effect of all anticoagulants [AVK, heparin(-likes), direct inhibitors]. In PRP, it is diminished in von Willebrand's disease, but it also shows the effect of platelet inhibitors (e.g. aspirin and abciximab). Addition of activated protein C (APC) or thrombomodulin inhibits thrombin generation and reflects disorders of the APC system (congenital and acquired resistance, deficiencies and lupus antibodies) independent of concomitant inhibition of the procoagulant pathway as for example by anticoagulants.
To determine whether the factor V Leiden mutation is associated with decreased bleeding in individuals with severe hemophilia A, factor concentrate utilization, maximum annual number of bleeding episodes, and the prevalence of hemophilic arthropathy between carriers and non-carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation were compared. Heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden mutation was found in 6 of 137 subjects (4.4%). Carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation utilized less factor concentrate (geometric mean: 310 vs. 1185 units/kg/year) and had fewer bleeding episodes than non-carriers (proportion with 10 or fewer bleeding episodes in their worst year: 50 vs. 11%). However, the factor V Leiden mutation was not associated with the absence of arthropathy. The intron 22 inversion mutation of the factor VIII gene was tested for in a subgroup of 80 subjects, but it was not found to be a significant variable for any of the bleeding endpoints. The results of this small study are consistent with the hypothesis that the factor V Leiden mutation imparts a protective effect; however, a larger confirmatory study in which the factor VIII molecular defects can be controlled for is needed. Furthermore, most severe hemophiliacs who used fewer than 200 units/kg/year of factor concentrate or who had experienced 10 or fewer bleeding episodes per year did not carry the factor V Leiden mutation, suggesting that the proportion of severe hemophiliacs whose mild clinical course can be attributed to the factor V Leiden mutation is small.
FEIBA (factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity) has a history of more than 30 years of successful use in controlling bleeding in haemophilic patients who have developed inhibitory antibodies against factor (F)VIII or FIX. Recently it was shown that FEIBA contains the proenzymes of the prothrombin complex factors, prothrombin, FVII, FIX and FX, but only very small amounts of their activation products, with the exception of FVIIa, which is contained in FEIBA in greater amounts. FEIBA controls bleeding by induction and facilitation of thrombin generation, a process for which FV is crucial. A number of biochemical in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that FXa and prothrombin play a critical role in the activity of FEIBA. Consequently, they are considered to be key components of this product. The prothrombinase complex has been found to be a major target site for FEIBA. Apart from prothrombin and FXa, FEIBA contains other proteins of the prothrombin complex, which could also facilitate haemostasis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors.
The clinical phenotype of patients with haemophilia A (HA) often differs between individuals with the same factor VIII (FVIII) gene defect (e.g. within the same family) or the same coagulant activity of FVIII (FVIII:C). We proposed that because the thrombin generation assay in platelet-poor plasma of HA patients provides more information [peak thrombin concentration, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), rate of thrombin generation and lag-time] than a clot-based FVIII assay it might provide insight into these differences. We therefore investigated the relation between the results of the thrombin generation assay and the clinical severity in nine families with HA (23 patients with different phenotypes). We also examined the contribution of prothrombotic risk factors: (FV Leiden G1691A and prothrombin G20210A), the coagulant activity of FVIII and tissue factor (5'UTR) polymorphisms. Our data detect marked differences between individuals but these did not correlate with the reported clinical phenotype. These differences were also reflected in a marked difference in response to the therapeutic amounts of FVIII. This might account for differences in amounts of treatment consumption. Reduced peak and possibly rate of thrombin generation, rather than FVIII:C or ETP appear to represent the critical defects in FVIII-deficient plasma. We suggest that the analysis of parameters in thrombin generation is a useful tool to detect bleeding tendency in HA but not to predict the modulation of the haemorrhagic tendency in patients within families. However the presence of the other factors such as vessel wall components, protein C and platelets might need to be incorporated into this system.