Table 1 - uploaded by Susana Sargento
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
This paper presents an experimental evaluation of an multi-service Ad-hoc network architecture, interconnected with a fixed network. This network supports the efficient delivery of services, unicast and multicast, legacy and multimedia, to users connected in the ad-hoc network. It contains functionalities of routing;multicast; mobility; distributed...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... first test determines the maximum throughput achieved in the network without losses. The throughput results are presented in the Table 1, as a function of the number of hops between the sender and the receiver. As can be observed the throughput decreases by a factor of two with the increase in the number of hops. ...
Context 2
... additional processing was added to every packet, we expect jitter and delay values to change when compared with the routing-only values. Table 10 depicts the jitter and delay obtained for a 3 hop scenario with different traffic. Values are represented in milliseconds. ...
Context 3
... packets result in charging and rewarding a higher number of packets; instability results in not rewarding all forwarded packets. Table 11 presents the results of traffic traversing the network and the number of proofs received to charge the traffic. The total deviation is a result of 3 packets lost between the last hop and the receiving node. ...
Similar publications
This paper presents an experimental evaluation of a multi-service Ad-hoc network architecture, interconnected with a fixed network. This network supports the efficient delivery of services, unicast and multicast, legacy and multimedia, to users connected in the ad-hoc network. It contains the support for routing with delivery of multicast services,...
