Figure - uploaded by Elrashed Yasin
Content may be subject to copyright.
Clinical information of ALL patients.

Clinical information of ALL patients.

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Different forms of human cancer show mutations for isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1/2). Mutation of these genes can cause aberrant methylation of the genome CpG islands (CGIs), which leads to an increase of suppressed oncogenes transcription or repression of active tumor suppressor gene transcription. This study aimed to identify the prevale...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents the most prevalent type of acute leukemia in adults and is responsible for approximately 80% of all cases. The tumor suppressor gene (TP53) is a gene that has been frequently studied in cancer, and mutations in this gene account for about 50% of human cancers. This study aims to evaluate the correlation betwe...

Citations

... The process used a Hot-Start Taq DNA polymerase to insert a dNTP set to the 30 ends of the primer annealed to the DNA template. The primers' sequence used in this process was described by Alkhatabi et al 13 (Table 2). After DNA amplification, the product was sequenced through cycle sequencing for verification. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: IDH1 and IDH2 are hotspot mutations commonly identified in WHO-grade 4 astrocytomas. Their association with TAMs has never been investigated. We aim to explore the crosstalk between the IDH1/2 mutation metabolic effect and TAMs in tumour microenvironment and how this relationship affects the tumour recurrence. Patients and methods: The study included 20 samples of patients with WHO-grade 4 astrocytoma. The alteration hotspot in codon IDH1R132 and IDH2R172 was examined using direct sequencing. The protein expression of CD204 on TAM was detected through immunohistochemistry. Results: IDH1R132 and IDH2R172 were symmetrically identified as wildtype in 18/20 tumours (90%) and the remaining 2 tumours (10%) showed synonymous mutations on both codons. Tumours with IDH1/2-wildtype showed high expression of CD204+TAMs in 10 cases and low expression in 8 cases. Typical expression was seen equally in IDH1/2 mutant tumours. There was no significant association between IDH1/2 and CD204+TAM expression (p= 0.999). The association between the two groups was significantly observed among IDH-wildtype tumours (p=0.027). Highly expressed CD204 in IDH-wildtype tumours showed a median recurrence at 10 months compared to low CD204 expression, showed a median recurrence interval at 24 months. Conclusion: IDH1R132 or IDHR172 has the same impact on the classification and prognosis of WHO-grade 4 astrocytoma. There was no crosstalk between IDH1/2 metabolic effect and CD204+TAM. However, IDH-wildtype glioblastomas with dense CD204+TAM are associated with early recurrence. Because the sample size is small, a larger study is recommended to determine the impact of IDH1/2 on TAMs.