Science topic

War Crimes - Science topic

War Crimes are criminal acts committed during, or in connection with, war, e.g., maltreatment of prisoners, willful killing of civilians, etc.
Questions related to War Crimes
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
18 answers
How can humans commit such massive and horrifying wars to the extent that millions of people die without exaggeration? No matter how aggressive or selfish humans can be, this does not justify such horrific acts. Not only do tens of thousands of people die, but they also often die in brutal ways, as seen in events like Hiroshima or what continues to happen today in Gaza.
Even if humans have sadistic or aggressive tendencies, such actions seem illogical for beings like us. I believe this phenomenon goes deeper than we can perceive. For instance, animals, while possessing a level of consciousness (albeit not as advanced as humans), do not commit atrocities on this scale.
In nature, stronger animals may prey on weaker ones, driven by survival instincts. Some animals even fight within their o
wn species, but not in the same catastrophic way humans do.
Humans, too, have survival instincts that drive them to act against external threats. Could it be that because humans are considered the dominant species on this planet, with little external threats to their survival, they redirect this aggression and survival instinct toward their own kind? Is it possible that this phenomenon is connected to a universal or natural principle where there must always be a higher power or a looming threat for balance?
Relevant answer
Answer
This question touches on the paradox of human consciousness I believe—our ability to create and empathise, yet also to destroy.
It prompts us to reflect: What values drive our actions? Could distorted values like power or fear overshadow empathy, allowing us to rationalize atrocities?
Survival instincts may play a role. Unlike animals, humans abstract these instincts, fighting for ideologies or identity rather than immediate needs. Without external threats, do we turn this aggression inward? How can we redirect these instincts toward creativity and connection?
You suggest a universal principle—needing external threats to unify us. Without them, do divisions grow unchecked? History shows humanity uniting against common challenges, but what if we chose collective goals that transcend conflict? What shared purpose could guide us toward unity?
Unlike animals, whose violence is bounded by survival, humans scale destruction through dehumanization. We see this everywhere especially with social media... This invites us to reflect: When have you consciously seen another’s humanity, even when it was hard?
The key may not lie in solving this paradox but in embracing it with awareness. Recognizing both our capacity for light and darkness, how can we nurture compassion in ourselves and our systems? What role does consciousness play in transcending our destructive instincts? I think reflecting on this gives us some direction.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
1 answer
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
After all, arrest werrent has been Issues with War Crime Conviction. However, the suffering of the victims and the death of their loved ones was not prevented.
Heartbreaking, such suffering continued and we watched on.
Surely we could and still can take better action for better and fairer world.
I attached my last book on Israel - Palestine solution I proposed.
Regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for initiating this discussion.
The whole world has been undergoing divisions. Almost everywhere, it can be seen that leaders spoke about unity. But, they kept on dividing people. Thus, there was a difference between what they spoke and what they did. All conflicts are a result of this difference between word and action. So, if we don't change our concept about leadership, we should go on expecting types of conflict that is being spoken in this discussion.
Best regards,
Anamitra.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
Relevant answer
Hi, I'm sorry but I haven't seen the film. Best regards
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
7 answers
World of people, most and majority playing bad politics with Gaza people, helpless Gaza people are put under the Bombardments, by Hamas, Cruelly been bombarded by cruel Israeli military, and Muslims playing competitions against Israelis, Muslims are adamant to defeat Israelis when Israelis are rigid and sharp on mission against Gaza Muslims. In all this Gaza helpless people are under the attacks and suffering..
Cruels, careless, warmongers, and playful groups from every directions, gazing at Gaza, and and holding Gaza people tightened -down as the dart 🎯 board, and world of people targeted on it, some hitting on it and all watching the aim and results. Allah Allah...
I don't care about I am not being liked. I say it is wrong Gaza people not been moved out. My heart pumps hard, my body shakes. I cannot be for in the game Gaza people made the game play, target point. For peace sake, for safe settlement Gaza people relocation is good move. Gaza isn't Muslims Holy land anyway. They say they fighting Holy war. Holy war for what? Land by seaside?
No one thought about to talk for negotiation land plan.
Do they really think they will force Jews out of there or will kill all the Jews ??? What???
Is Israel is cruel and crook minded, Zionists' Government. There USA standing with fuel worse cruelly fuelling the fire.
Since Israel has been mandated state there, Arab League accepted Israel as an state. To stop the conflict, Muslim nations must have talked about to resolve with land plan, to make boundaries for separate states.
Crushner of USA, want Gaza to make coastal tourists resort, Muslims Holding weak bleeding injured Gaza people, unduly fighting world's super power USA. By force pushing people out of homeland is ethnic cleansing, though through talk, by plan relocation for peace and political negotiation is called the resolution.
Regards,
Fatema Miah
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for initiating this interesting discussion.
The problem that you have mentioned is being made to look like a political problem. Basically, its a problem between the 'haves' and 'have not'. Its an economical problem. Therefore, the world will be a better place if there is some sort of economic balance here. That balance can be brought in through education and up skilling. Now, whether that will ever happen is a million dollar question.
Best regards,
Anamitra.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
acta jure imperii, state sovereign immunity, genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, military occupation, property rights, civil tort law, jurisdiction, right to a fair trial.
Relevant answer
Answer
نعم الكتب متوفرة عن جرائم الحرب والجرائم ضد الانسانية وجرائم الاحتلال واذا تحب ارسل لك مصادر الكترونية من تطبيق التلي كرام
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
2 answers
The best way to create a whole generation of terrorists is to warn them (and not kill them as they did in the old days not too long ago) before dropping bombs on their homes and workplace. And then people wonder why the unemployment rate is so high in Gaza. Who is in charge over there?
It can’t be Netanyahu who at The Hague would say truthfully, “I had nothing to do with the genocide, Hamas made me do it.”
And Hamas would reply truthfully at The Hague: “I had nothing to do with the genocide, Israel made me do it.”
Relevant answer
Answer
It's to uphold continuous occupation, illegal settlements, forced displacement, imprisonment of thousands without trial, restriction of movement of people and goods, stealing of culture, ignoring all UN resolutions pushing towards self-determination, burning olive trees, stealing homes, dehumanization, a racist and ethno-nationalist discourse leading to ethnic cleansing and genocide when the opportunity presents itself, disproportionate use of military strength, Hasbara, double standards in applying international law, targeting of internal dissident voices, do we really need to go on?
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
1 answer
When Norman Finkelstein, an anti-war activist and intellectual (Princeton PhD, 1988), was asked what his mother, who was in the Majdanek concentration camp in Europe during WWII, thought of retaliation on civilians for crimes committed by Hitler her response was, “Since they elected him they are totally responsible for his actions and therefore deserve to be punished.”  (But keep in mind that the dictatorship occurred after the election).  If the ‘Finkelstein’ rule were applied to Gaza, then there should be no slaughter of civilians since the Gazans live under a Hamas dictatorship; once elected almost two decade ago (in 2006), Hamas has assumed total power of the strip and they have built a military infrastructure (e.g., 500 Km of tunneling) while Israel has denied basic services to the Gazan people, who live in a concentration camp; but since the only way out is by tunnel controlled by Hamas, Gazans are used as shields against Israeli attacks, which this time might cause the death of over 100,000 civilians given the invasion has yet to start and the number of dead is already over 7,000.  I say The Hague needs to do something about all this killing of both Palestinians and Israelis by Netanyahu and Hamas.  But don’t expect much since the US who is not an International Criminal Court member and who has veto power in the UN has been committing war crimes for a long time (Henry Kissinger of the Vietnam war era is not free to travel just anywhere even at 100 years of age) and you all know the many cases of crimes committed in the name of freedom….Israel is merely a mini-partner in these crimes along with Hamas and its backers from Iran/Russia, all war criminals as well.  In short we must ask, “Why are we allowing war criminals to run the world?”
Relevant answer
Answer
The US foreign policy has a long history of flirting with zionism, notably after the outbreak of the world war. During this period we see several converts to zionism and related organisations (which had obvious interests in palestine), coinciding with the collapse of the ottoman empire, which the imperial powers hawked. Among the converts we see: Louis Brandies, Julian W. Marck, Felix Frankfurter, among others. Brandies himself would later become a supreme court justice (p. 846)
This is testament to a certain political milieu, where the protestant and zionist lobbies were able to exert pressure on american politics. Brandies held particular sway over Wilson(p. 848). The fact of the matter was that this sentiment of american intervention in the middle east was quite lucrative to american interests and to the religious lobbies. The Balfour declaration was also pre empted by Brandies, who had correspondance six months beforehand, proposing in a document that: "palestine is to be recognized as the jewish national home; jews of all countries [are] to be accorded full liberty of immigration; jews [are]to enjoy full national, political residence in Palestine" (p. 847-848).
The further development of zionism in the US, starting with Wilson and Brandies (further reading below), is continual with each president. The simplest answer to the question of why war criminals are supported, even voted for, is that there are both political lobbies and vital american interests resting on the continued existance of Israel. There are not easy solutions to this, but historically it seems to me, there was little actual popular support for the zionist project, and moreso political navigating and delusions of grandeur.
further reading:
Hassan, Shamir (2016)
Politics of the zionist lobby in the united states of America, proceedings of the indian history congress, vol. 77. pp. 846-859 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/26552715?read-now=1&seq=3#page_scan_tab_contents)
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
17 answers
Since the Ukrainian/Russo war began the tendency has been for some observers to say, albeit rhetorically, change will happen in Russia when its people know of the war crimes. But what if they know, and don't care?
Relevant answer
Answer
Some points from economic history:
In the 1690s, there was a substantial GDP per capita gap between Russia and northwest Europe, with Russia at barely half the Dutch level and less than 60% of the British level. Russia was also lagging behind Mediterranean Europe, at less than 70% of the Italian level. During the first half of the 18th century, however, Russia entered a catching-up phase, as per capita GDP grew faster than in Britain, Italy, and the Netherlands. By the 1760s, Russian GDP per capita had reached over 60% of the Dutch level, nearly 70 of the British level and almost 90% of the Italian level. However, this period of Russian catching-up was followed by a period of falling behind during the second half of the 18th century, as GDP per capita declined in Russia while it grew rapidly in Britain and stagnated in the Netherlands. By the 1800s, Russia had fallen further behind northwest Europe than in the 1690s. As Russia stagnated during the 19th century, growth continued in Britain and the Netherlands, so that by the 1880s GDP per capita in Russia was just over 20% of the British level and less than 30% of the Dutch level. For Russia, the late industrialisation of the 1890s was followed by another phase of shrinking after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. It was only after Stalin’s Big Push industrialisation of the 1930s that GDP per capita gains were permanently consolidated .
Conclusion: Failing to do something fast enough or on time, with respect to economic measures, seems to be an internal (chronic) issue of Russia, i.e. of the people and its leadership as mentality and economics are deeply connected.
_______
_____
ALEXANDER GERSCHENKRON, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, A Book of Essays, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962
No past experience, however rich, and no historical research, however thorough, can save the living generation the creative task of finding their own answers and shaping their own future. Alexander Gerschenkron
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
4 answers
I want to understand if there is any research telling the accuracy of AI tools when investigating human rights violations and war crimes
Relevant answer
Answer
AI is one more forgery of the Elite, on the top of media, academia, and politics.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
16 answers
I am currently researching an criminal responsibility of legal persons (corporations) under international criminal law (decision of Special Tribunal for Lebanon). I know that never ever such responsibility was drawn in history of int. crim. law, but now I thinking about domestic level. Do you know any case where such responsibility of legal person was drawn on national level for crimes under international law such as war crimes or crimes against humanity? Thank you very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Briefing of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Facts: This case involves a complaint brought under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) alleging that the Appellants—the parent holding companies at the apex of the huge Royal Dutch Shell international, integrated oil enterprise—are liable under the ATS on the theory that their actions aided the government of Nigeria in inflicting human rights abuses on the Ogoni peoples in the jungles of Nigeria. The complaint alleges that Shell knew of human rights abuses committed by officials of the government of Nigeria and took actions which contributed indirectly to the commission of those offenses.
Procedural History: The case has been heard by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kimba M. Wood, Judge) and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (JACOBS, Chief Judge, LEVAL, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges). The courts have dismissed the complaint.
Issues: The main legal questions that the court must decide in this case are: (1) which body of law governs the question of corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) - international law or domestic law; and (2) what do the sources of international law reveal with respect to whether corporations can be subject to liability for violations of the law of nations.
Rule: The court used the sources of international law identified in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ Statute”) to come to a decision in this case.
Holding: The court decided that the complaint did not satisfy the standard of pleading specific facts that would allow the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant was liable for the misconduct alleged. Therefore, the court dismissed the suit against SPDC for lack of personal jurisdiction on June 21, 2010. No action or remedy was ordered.
Reasoning: The court reached its decision by looking to the sources of international law identified in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ Statute”). These sources include international conventions, international custom, the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, and judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations. The court then looked to international tribunals, such as the Nuremberg Tribunals, to see if any had held a corporation liable for a violation of the law of nations. It found that none had. The court then looked to the Supreme Court's decision in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004), which held that a norm must enjoy universal acceptance to qualify as a rule of international law. The court then looked to the sources of international law to determine whether corporate liability had attained universal acceptance as a rule of customary international law. It found that it had not. Lastly, the court looked to the arcane terminology of international law and found that a corporation is a “subject” of international law and is therefore capable of being a plaintiff or a defendant in an action based on a violation of the law of nations. The court concluded that nothing in the sources of international law revealed that corporate liability had attained universal acceptance as a rule of customary international law, and thus, it could not limit or foreclose criminal, administrative, or civil actions against any corporation under a body of law other than customary international law.
I hope that case information will help.
Kind regard,
Rada Pavlova
@
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
2 answers
Aggression is one of the core international crimes as Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and war crimes.
Relevant answer
Answer
The answer to the question over whom the Courts have jurisdiction with respect to aggression is to be found in Rome rather than in Kampala, or even in New York.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
On White Supremacy:
The obsession as to whether human-kind is fundamentally bad or good has preoccupied scholars for millennia. This can be traced back to the Catholic theologian, Augustine (354-430), who believed that men and women are basically bad, all born into original sin, and therefore require close supervision by which to cleanse their souls. In the enlightened age, intellectuals such as Rousseau (1712-1778) came up with the counter argument defending the premise that human-kind is basically good, an ethos that has been adopted by many liberal societies of today even if only by lip-service. We know that if one wants an economy that is maximally uncreative and unproductive, totalitarianism (left or right driven) is the best political system by which to achieve this. Here a minority of the population under its leadership employs all the state’s resources to control the majority under the assumption that the majority has ‘bad habits’ that must be altered and if not possible contained using police-state tactics. Such a society is unsustainable, as we witnessed with the disintegration of the Soviet Union in December 1991.
So, what about White Supremacy. This viewpoint has a long history in the United State going back to the age of slavery [1620 to 1865] when Black people (including their children) were sold and killed like cattle. At its zenith in 1860, some 13% of the US population, 4 million people of a population of 31 million, were enslaved. Shortly after the passage of the 13th Amendment (which was meant to end slavery in 1865) segments of the White population resisted this policy by forming the Ku Klux Klan who adopted an Augustine-viewpoint that led to the mass lynching of mainly Black males that continued well into the mid-20th Century. According to the Equal Justice Initiative (2017), 4084 African-Americans were lynched between 1877 and 1950, mainly in the Southern United States. In the 1960’s three acts were passed by Congress to remedy this bad history: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968.
Now let us fast forward to the Age of Trump (2016-2020). Donald Trump, an Independent, became a Republican so that he could win the presidential election in November 2016. His madness, which includes racism, bigotry, and contempt for women, is expressed regularly via Twitter and Fox News. This madness has now been amplified by the recent killing of an African American man, George Floyd, who was caught on camera being suffocated by a Minneapolis police officer. With Christian Bible in hand and in front of St. Johns church in Washington DC, Trump declared (much like Hitler did during his rallies in the 30 and 40’s) that he would impose law and order on the masses who are protesting the killing of George Floyd. So far, 10,000 protesters have been arrested by police (Aljazeera, June 4, 2020). The ~ 25,000 White Supremacist of America are standing by to see whether Trump can create an opportunity for them to return America to its roots: by having a large segment of the population (mainly immigrant and non-White) be put under the control of a White minority to satisfy (unbeknown to them) the dictates of the Catholic theologian, Augustine (354-430). If you believe in humanity and its sustainability, you can never allow this to happen since this is a recipe to continuous warfare, much like what goes on in the Middle East today.
Relevant answer
Answer
Not accepted at all. All popple must equal. All humans are from one origin.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
20 answers
Biologists agree that all normal children have tendency to help and be sociable and are curious to learn . It seems like there is a little voice that guide them. However; growing up ; a second voice comes to compete with the first one and adults become more selfish, competition between people becomes normal and crimes and wars are our daily news. What happened to us? Why this dangerous change? Any way to solve this?
Please share your ideas.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, we all are born genetically good, but it is the environment that shapes us.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
5 answers
Am planning research on moral injury but am having difficulties getting ethics approval out of fear that war crimes might be disclosed in the interview process. Any information or strategies appreciated.
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
6 answers
I am writing about my father's ordeals during WW2. He was captured in Serbia and was held for 3.5 years in German Stalags for POWs in Germany and France. I am especially interested in Stalag 12F (Forbach), 12E (Metz), 12D (Trier), 12A (Diez, near Limburg)and Saarburg - hospital for POWs from France, Serbia and Italy. Also will help me - anything on Serbian soldiers POWs.
Many thanks!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, I will send you a message.
Leah
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
7 answers
I am interested in knowing about movements' and (I)NGOs' direct involvement in achieving peace and (arguably) justice in the wake of crimes against humanity, war crimes and/or systematic breaches of fundamental human rights.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Take a look at my book, Importing Democracy: The Role of NGOs in Argentina, South Africa and Tajikistan, available on Researchgate. One of the chapters on Tajikistan has an extensive discussion of the role of civil society in helping end the Tajik Civil War in the 1990s.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
25 answers
(BY REQUEST, RE-OPENED). This is a social question, with immediate technical relevance. Cybersecurity, for example, depends on this question, and trust as "reliance on expected behavior" [1,2].
A positive answer can be reached through control, you just turn-off the offending user. But, when control is not possible (example, the Internet), or as when central control does not even exist, trust evaporates if it is based solely on control (or, better yet, fear of control). However, can trust be based on other factors in addition to control, or even fear of control? Does that pose a better future for a society that accepts it?
What is your experience, reasoned expectations, or theory?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
Your answer seems to give good examples. Trust is earned, reciprocity is one way to earn trust, even in absolute monarchies in middle-age Europe.
In some societies, if there is as a rule (say) that if one lives in an apartment building with more than three stories, one cannot shower after 9 pm and before 5 pm, because of potential noise to neighbors, there is no explicit cost if one disobeys but hardly anyone does. That would be an example, or if everyone likely wants to disobey the traffic lights late at night, because of potential robbery and the streets are empty, but the law has cameras with heavy fines if one disobeys, a conflict of rights can ensue -- the traffic law versus individual right to life.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
61 answers
If Adolph Hitler had presented evidence proving he was suffering from a mental illness that prevented him from knowing the difference between right and wrong at the times of the alleged violations of international war conventions and customs of war, could he have been found not guilty by reason of insanity? If so, what would the consequences be or what should they be?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mental illness would technically be a defence to a war crime since anyone suffering from it would have the valid defence of being unable to form the mens rea for any crime.
Adolf Hitler was however not insane and did not suffer from mental illness at the time the war crimes of the 3rd Reich were planned and started.  Had Hitler been mentally ill he would not have been able to maintain control of the state and the equally criminal individuals within it.   
The crimes of the 3rd Reich could not have been the product of mental illness since they were carried out collectively by thousands of individuals often acting in the absence of any traceable orders.  Apart from the rantings at his speeches and the sinister threats in Mein Kampf there is no written evidence that Hitler himself ordered many of the most bestial of crimes committed in this regimes name.  His Lieutenants were all very keen to please and executing the Fuhrer's wish was enough motivation to those with similar hideously distorted world views.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
10 answers
Are there any mobile apps for mass casualty blast injury documentation in the emergency room, especially for war crimes, crimes against humanity purposes? Because the ED is usually frantically trying to triage and save lives, this sort of documentation is very difficult, but I read somewhere about a competition in the Hague that someone developed an app to be used in this situation - it didn't win the comp, but it would win my vote if I could find it! Please help...!
Relevant answer
Answer
There are many relavent materials at the CDC website
Try the following linke: http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/5705
Best wishes from Paris
Isaac
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
4 answers
I'm interested in how R2P, which covers mass atrocity crimes  (genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity and war crimes) gained essentially "most favored norm" status while competing normative candidates covering much wider scale human suffering and loss of life such as extreme poverty and HIV/AIDS comparatively failed. I'm interested in how the sociological literature on social problems as well as the IR literatures on norm contestation and argumentation might help me make sense of this puzzle. 
Relevant answer
Answer
I will send you my article due to be published in the special issue of the Journal of Human rights next month. It raises the same issues about R2P
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
6 answers
Dear All,
I am researching on the role of the Nigerian railways in the Nigerian Civil War. I am looking for materials on how the Nigerian forces and the Biafran armies appropriated the railways to achieve or sabotage the war.
I am particularly interested in texts that describe how the railways were used in transporting troops and materials; what and what were transported on the railways and how the government controlled the system during the war. I am also interested in text that describes or suggests killings of Igbo and other Nigerian groups in transit, as well as how the Biafran forces used the system to scuttle the Nigerian forces or achieve their mission.
I also welcome suggestions on texts with further insights on the role of railways/ transport and logistic in warfare on comparative level.
I Thank you in anticipation of your response,
Relevant answer
Answer
This is an interesting but rather dry topic. Dry in the sense that very little documented information is available. I worked for the Nigerian Railways when the war broke out. I was at a remote station that was used primarily for traffic operations (crossing trains) on the single line block system. The only link between the station and the world outside was the railway block telegraph system.The phone was an open line system, connecting all stations from Lagos up to Minna at the Northern end of the Western District sector.  Through this phone the traffic controller in Lagos gathered information about the position of any train on the network. When the war broke out, it was the means by which Ibo railway officials living in the North of Nigeria informed themselves of developments in the civil unrest.
I cannot give exact dates here. But when the first round of kiilings of Ibos started in 1966 in Northern Nigeria, the railway stations served as a haven for fleeing Ibo natives. They took the first available train (passenger or goods) going south to Lagos from where they found their way to the East. An Ibo staff at my station,asked m e to check for the position of any train. He returned to his quarters to prepare his wife and new-born  baby to leave. He came back out with just a package, probably food for the baby. The train stopped, they boarded, and were gone.  I remained because, although an Easterner, only Ibos were originally the target.  About the next evening, I received a call on the block telegraph from a staff at a station close to Minna. He reported a mob attack on a waiting room full of passengers waiting for train to flee, but were killed indiscriminately. Other Easterners non Ibos began to leave, using the railway because it seemed the safest means. However, a mob attack on on a passengers train at a station was a cause for concern. There was the report of a bold train driver who decided to break the rules to save his passengers fleeing southward. The train was booked to stop at a station (Zungeru, I believe). The driver had been hinted that a mob awaited his Ibo passengers if he stopped at the stain. The driver, reportedly drove through the station without stopping, and so could take his passengers through, alive. 
Reports of attacks on stations and trains compelled me to leave my station on a goods train. It became clear that strategic locations on the railway line were now in some way check-points. For example, every train coming from the North must cross the bridge over the River Niger on its way south. Every train was stopped on this bridge for military checks. So was mine. The soldiers searched everyone and every coach before it was allowed to leave the bridge. I arrived in Lagos and was assigned to Ibadan where I worked until the war was over. in 1971.
As regards use of the railway for movements of soldiers or for the war effort, it is very unlikely that the railway could serve such a purpose efficiently. I have three works on the civil war. (1) Thirteen Years of Military Rule 1966-1979 by James O. Ojiako mentions plans to revolutionize transport and communication only in the famous 30 billion Naira budget. (2) Why We Struck by Adewale Ademoyega (1981) offers some insight into the movement of troops by military vehicles from he barracks. (3) The Giant of the Cemetery by Jimmy Essien (1985) virtually weeps over the deplorable state of public transportation as "trains strain" along at snail speed. Such transport system could hardly serve reliable military purposes. Soldiers travelled by train or by road, etc, but I do not know of any real effort to use the railway for such a purpose. I would suggest that you find out if the railway served the purpose of transporting heavy military equipment from North to South.  I do not think that it would be difficult to find out by inquiring at the goods sheds at depot stations such as Apapa, Iddo, Ebute-Meta, Ibadan, Kaduna and Kano. 
Good luck with your work.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
4 answers
I am writing an argumentative essay on the topic The best way to tackle terrorism and I can't seem to get materials on it.
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest to begin with the classical literature of strategy and war in order to understand basic assumptions and explanations (from different approaches) about and for war.
Four important books:
Ropert Smith - The Utility of Force
Colin Gray - The Strategy Theory for Practice Bridge
Azar Gat - War in Human Civilization
Edward Lutwak - Strategy of War and Peace
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
2 answers
Since there is still a debate going on about this issue, what - if any - empirical evidence do the advocators of enhanced interrogation techniques have?
Relevant answer
Answer
My opinion attached:
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
How has 23 years (1990 – 2013) of war contributed to slum build up in Kabul City and its subsequent effect on the developing housing process and existing housing conditions?
The year 1978 saw a coup in Kabul that resulted in foreign and civil war within Afghanistan that’s still being continued till present day. The man made disasters have caused over three million Afghan civilians to migrate to 75 countries around the world and hundreds and thousands more to internally migrate. With many people being displaced and homeless, slums began to sporadically appear around various major cities.
Relevant answer
Answer
Rather than thinking about slums as a negative, why not consider it as an unavoidable consequence of development, even maybe a positive indicator of progress?
Links for arguments to that effect...
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
50 answers
The latest revelations about CIA torture methodologies demonstrates that medical doctors took part in what is euphemistically described as Enhanced Interrogation Techniques.  How is it that an international doctrine prohibiting medical doctors from involvement in torture has failed in one of the countries that presided over the Nuremberg Trials?
Can we trust any nation that employs doctors in torture to simultaneously apply the principalist ethic Primum non Nocere in its hospitals and medical practice generally?
Should those 'medics' be identified and disbarred for life from medical practice? 
Relevant answer
Answer
The big conundrum with the Nuremberg Doctrine is that it banned the use of data obtained in Nazi concentration camp experiments entirely.  It is well known that the majority of so called scientific research in the camps was of no scientific value whatsoever and was the product of fantasist race theory but some was of obvious use.
The US and Soviet space programmes relied heavily not only on Nazi rocket engineers but on some of the medical experiments carried out on unwilling prisoners. The rationale behind the Nuremberg Doctrine was that to use this data would in someway justify the appalling brutality that was used to obtain it.
Returning to torture and the involvement of medics there is no justification for torture at all and no exception to the international law that the US and the Allies imposed on the World in 1945.  Torture is not even efficient and many people give information under torture that is false simply to make the pain stop.  Many tortured actually do not know anything anyway.  
In the GDR sleep deprivation was the most common form of what is euphemistically described as EIT.  The victim was sat in a chair facing an interrogator and kept awake for many hours under constant interrogation.  The interrogators changed shifts but the interrogation continued until the victim gave the information the Stasi wanted.  Incidentally it did not need to be true, only what they wanted to hear which was usually the denouncing of others.
No one was able to resist for long and this technique can't be beaten by training.  The problem with it is that many victims were so disorientated and confused by the lack of sleep that their answers were useless in terms of information of real value.  Any psychiatrist or clinical psychologist could have told the torturers that.
The psychiatrists, psychologists and other medics involved in torture or EIT or whatever other euphemism is used for brutality are not only condoning it but facilitating it.  Those doctors are themselves torturers and there is no convenient excuse for it.  
The Nazi doctors at Auschwitz and other facilities in the 3rd Reich believed what they were doing was for the good of humanity too.  The KGB and the MfS believed that they were protecting socialism for the good of mankind.  Its always easy to find an excuse but impossible to justify one.
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
3 answers
I am interested in the WWII, the Eastern front and the British perspective. If youu have good ideas of research topic and or valuable materials of these topics, I am open to discussion.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mari - I would point you towards the "Holocaust and Genocide Studies" journal, Volume 11, No.2, Fall 1997 (Oxford University Press) that deals directly with this issue, and features an article by Stuart Erdheim "Could the Allies have bombed Auschwitz-Birkenau?"  YOu could actually put this together with a discussion of the decision to fire-bomb Dresden in February 1945, and compare and contrast the decision making and policies that led to very different results.  An additional question would be what were the post-war legacy effects of both decisions?
This should help - please let me know if it does not and you need/want more information.
Cheers
Don
  • asked a question related to War Crimes
Question
15 answers
Did Kantian pacifism (see “Zum ewigen Frieden”) - in which both Kelsen and Bobbio found an instrument to realize the so-called “Peace through Law” - complete fail?
Relevant answer
Answer
I was referring specifically to Perpetual Peace. My point is that it is a "transcendental principle of practical reason. In the old translation I have the last 4 paragraphs of "Eternal Peace" as Friedrich has it make this clear. It is neither a prescription nor a prediction. Such principle, if they are sound, apply universally, like the categorical imperative. They need to be typified to have any meaning for what we normally call political practice. We must act "as if" ("als ob") perpetual peace will occur. How a rational actor must think and what principles should guide conduct are what Kant can tell us about. I guess I think this is true of much, if not all, of his moral philosophy (practical reason). To go to making predictions one has to understand the principles of judgment, a very different thing. Without Kant, incidentally there is no Hegel, with Hegel there is no Marx. Hegel suggests that Kant is too abstract and does not understand the course of history, the development of the universal idea through history. Marx criticizes Hegel as too abstract as the 11th thesis on Feuerbach makes clear.
My main view is that one does not simply apply theory to discover correct practice. This, I think, is one the most important things that Kant, Hegel and Marx have in common.