Science topic
Vegetation - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Vegetation, and find Vegetation experts.
Questions related to Vegetation
I want to include Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) variable in Species Distribution Model (SDM), does anyone know where can I get this data? My model would be conducted on global scale using R, and I would like to use the NDVI data with resolution in at least 2.5 minute (~ 5 * 5 km). Thanks for any help.
What is the solar system like? And how does it work?
The building blocks of the Universe is a Panpsychist Quantum phenomenon. This unprecedented statement places us to where Quantum Mechanics become obsolete. To claim this spectacle of a statement, it would change our perception of an unintelligent mechanical universe to an evolutionary universe with a journey. This point of view would apply to every single element of our universe and suns cannot be an exception.
The knowledge that we have of our sun and its ingredients is all physical. We know our Sun has over 98% Hydrogen and Helium, but the Hydrogen and Helium that we know here on Earth cannot produce heat of millions of degrees, continuously, for billions of years. The reality is, the hydrogen that we know, cannot survive for a moment in such heat. Another question is the gravity of the sun. If the Sun has massive gravity, then why can it not hold the whole of its body at the same rate of velocity, because each section of its body rotates at many different speeds. Or, if it is the heaviest planet, then why is it made of the lightest elements known of the periodic table? The formation of a sun is another mystery and the rotation of planets in a plane is another big question mark. But by using the Panpsychist Quantum principles all these questions can be answered.
Key words: Sun-hydrogen, Sun formation, sun’s gravity, sun’s energy, planet rotation, sun rotation, quantum photon energy.
THE SUN
If we ask a toddler to draw a sun, he or she will draw a circle with some lines sticking out around the circle. The lines are representing the sunlight that is coming out of the sun and nothing is going in. This is the exact character of any sun; energy is coming out of the sun and nothing goes into the sun.
We ought to accept the fact that the Universe has been designed to create and survive the old-fashioned way, in a sense, we are duplicating the Universe. We are both made of the same chemical elements and each chemical element must have the same structure to follow, and that without temperature does not exist. Therefore, it brings us to the concept of creating life and supporting life.
To investigate the foundation of life (all species and vegetation), we would end up that life consists of a few atoms and molecules, and these atoms and molecules wouldn’t exist without temperature. The deeper explanation of life is the visibility of all mass conservation of energy. Simply nothing exists without temperature. The ‘life’ is started with a composite of the smallest complete entity unit of the universe, it is pronounced ATOM.
The chart of all the elements of the periodic table is hard evidence that each atom is presenting the exact character of that specific atom. Each atom is carrying its own mass, number of electron(s), size, color, taste, odor, the boiling/freeze point, chemical reaction, performing certain characteristic behavior, and each is holding specific information, and each has an evolutionary journey to create heavier atoms or molecules and ultimately life. Therefore, to achieve their consistency, they need environmental stability with some sort of support, nothing but right energy or temperature. Each atom conserves energy through nature where friction is no subject in an atom’s body. Simply, an atom does not work mechanically. This unprecedented statement discards Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentally.
As we know the strongest, smallest ancestor of every chemical element is the hydrogen atom, where each hydrogen atom is the composite of many unknown numbers of panpsychist quantum particles. Fortunately, we are aware of many types of isotope hydrogen. Yet the hydrogen that we know on earth has a natural journey to make heavier elements (PT). This hydrogen can not be in two places at the same time; therefore, it has the complementary partner to support its expedition. This duality exists in everything in the Universe.
SUN-HYDROGEN
Or
S-H
When and how is a Sun created?
We are going to determined how a sun appears in the Universe and how it is holding itself to survive for hundreds of billions of years with the harmony of the universe quantum nature concept. Suns are the only source of energy in a galaxy, in a sense, it is supporting life in the galaxy.
Sunlight or photons, the product of a sun, is mass-less and travel on a straight line; not forever, because, the nature of the space of the Universe is cold and absorbs energy as it is traveling. Therefore, the high frequency and short wavelength of the sunlight as it’s traveling, loses its energy in the course of billions of miles. The frequency and wavelength of sunlight is designed to support all its planets in its system; thus, finally it is exhausted on the rim of the galaxy. For the same reason the planets in the system are visible, and for the same reason each galaxy in the space of the universe is observed separately.
Suns are smart by nature. As the planets are circling a sun, the sun provides them energy. Sunlight’s duty is to carry and transfer photons (energy) from a sun to each of its planets by different wave lengths. Since it is mass-less it is not affected by anything, not even by the *gravity that most scientists think of; it is, however, affected by going through the long journey of cold space. The Sun is giving visibility and energy to all its surrounding planets, and for the same reason we are able to see and observe the most remote planets.
*See my Gravity is a Myth article or Gravity Is Internal.
But deep inside any sun there are tremendous functions at play that connect all the elements of the atoms in the Universe together, which is way beyond our imagination, because suns are creators of something that we never thought of before.
How much do we know scientifically about a sun? Or are the things that we think we know about the Sun true?
Well, there are some facts that no one can deny, such as: The Sun’s diameter is about 109 times bigger than the Earth and the rotation of the Sun is different from the Earth because it consists of more than 98% of the lightest known elements such as hydrogen and helium. It is like a large hot air balloon of light gas without the balloon itself. The surface of the Sun does not have a boundary; therefore, each part of the Sun has a different speed of rotation, due to its ingredient of a large fragile cloud of a light element.
For instance: the spot on the equator (the large circle) of the Sun, takes 24.47 Earth days to rotate once around or come to the same position; but as you go north or south from the equator, the rotation goes slower. The Sun’s South and North Poles take 38 days to rotate one cycle. These two speeds of rotation are telling us that the Sun does not have a solid body like the Earth, instead it is a hollow sphere with very light gas inside. So, the Sun’s skin is like a flaming ocean that at the equator runs faster than any other area of the Sun. These two speeds have been observed and measured, by an optical telescope, as sunspots that are moving across the Sun’s surface.
The Sun’s temperature varies in different sections; it can reach 6000 to 20,000 degrees centigrade on the surface depending on the region. The temperature of the outer surface of the Sun (corona) is about 1,000,000-2,000,000K, and some parts even go up to about 8,000,000K. This is all fact.
But, when it comes to when the Sun was created, how the Sun was born, what is inside the Sun, or how the sun is generating its energy with golden sunlight, then everything becomes speculation because no one knows for sure, when, how or what is going on inside a Sun.
Let me bring up a few examples and then you will realize how complicated the Sun is for scientists.
The most common one is that we assume that our Sun formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and that it has not changed dramatically in its existence. Scientists also think that our Sun is now about middle-aged and has another 5 billion years to go.
Since 1904 until now, there are so many variations of theories that exist, that when you want to know about the Sun, you get confused; because each scientist has his/her own theory and when you compare them to each other, each one contradicts the other.
One of the main theories would be that a nuclear fusion reaction in the Sun’s core creates the powerful energy of the Sun. Most scientists believe that most of the Sun’s life energy is produced by this nuclear fusion in the core region. This theory is supported by a group of top scientists around the world, including Albert Einstein. Mr. Einstein has related that the source of the Sun’s energy output to be equivalent to his mass-energy formula of E=mc2. How this nuclear fusion is taking place though is a mystery and no one can explain it.
They believe that the core is the only region in the Sun that produces a substantial amount of thermal energy through nuclear fusion. 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by the time it reaches 30% of the radius, the fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers. Finally, it is transferred to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space as sunlight or the kinetic energy of particles. The core has a density of about 150 times the density of water and temperatures can reach close to 15.7 million degrees Kelvin. By contrast, the sun’s surface temperature is about 5800K at the equator.
This is one of the major theories that have existed for more than one hundred years and most cosmologists believe it strongly. Also, by recent studies, they believe that the Sun is composed of two of the lightest chemical elements of the periodic table. Hydrogen is holding 74.9% and helium accounts for 23.8% of the mass of the Sun. The remaining elements, which consist of less than 2%, are Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively.
Furthermore, the nuclear fusion in the Sun's core has modified the composition by converting hydrogen into helium, so the Sun’s innermost portion is now roughly 60% helium, with the abundance of heavier elements unchanged. The Sun’s death will occur after the hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped. Then the sun will collapse into itself.
All this that has been mentioned about the nuclear fusion inside the Sun and the life expectancy is just speculation and not definitive; but scientists strongly believe all the above because there is no other strong theory that exists. One thing is certain however, the content of the Sun is hydrogen and helium. All this information is just about our Sun that has been collected in the last few decades.
Unfortunately, there is so much information out there about our Sun, which in many ways contradicts each other, and many of which do not follow the laws of physics that we know, and they all have theoretical problems.
Theoretical Problems
The biggest problem of all is that the hydrogen element that we know here on Earth cannot survive at such high temperatures. It would rip apart in a fraction of a second at such temperatures. The question arises, how could a hydrogen atom in a sun create this tremendous energy (high temperature of millions of degrees) for billions of years? It does not fit into the physics that we know.
For producing photons, the electromagnetic force in the atom must generate these photons, but the inside of the Sun does not show any evidence of a large electromagnetic force. This is another reason why the electromagnetic force in the atoms has stayed put as a theory for more than half a century.
Also, the scientists think that the Sun is over 99% of the entire mass of the solar system because they believe our Sun is made of heavy-elements. But the Sun has more than 98% of two of the lightest elements in the periodic table, hydrogen and helium. So, what are these considered heavy-elements? No one has any clue.
Scientists think that the Sun’s energy is creating a lot of mass, because of Albert Einstein’s theory of E=mc², in which the energy of photons is producing mass, (a photon has no mass), while the mass itself is a mystery in our Universe. The scientists don’t know how matter got in the Universe, or how the Universe is gaining and producing a mass. But most important of all, is that they don’t know how the photon is created by the hydrogen atom continuously for billions of years, and how the hydrogen atom is surviving at that temperature of millions of degrees. Another theoretical problem is with the energy that the Sun has been producing for more than 4 billion years continuously through nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun. This does not make any scientific sense, because nuclear fusion that we know creates tremendous heat, with ultraviolet rays not photons, and the energy is accrued one time not continuously, but there is no such color or indication of action of nuclear fusion in the sun. Also, if a sun has tremendous gravity, then why does it have different speeds in different sections of its body? Or why are comets and asteroids rejected by the sun through its flaming?
As you can see, the Sun is a very complicated star that we really don’t know much about, because everything that the scientists are thinking reveals that one side of the equation does not match with other side of the equation.
How the Sun was formed
(According to today’s scientists)
At first, I would recommend you go to social media and search for “how the Sun was formed” then you will get more familiar with our Sun. Not to mention that most of the theories are about ourSun, not any other suns, because the scientists didn’t go that far.
Here is a concise belief and general idea of how our Sun was created from the scientist’s point of view.
The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a large gravitational collapsing cloud of gas inside an interstellar cloud. This cloud was pulled by a supernova for several million years before the collapse, and then it became a rotating disk with a large central knot where most of the mass is concentrated in the center. With high gravity and pressure in the region it flattened out into a disk and eventually it created planets and our Solar system’s body was shaped. And later, all the planets were formed.
The central knot continued to collapse under its own strong gravity force; it caused the interior of the Sun’s temperatures to soar, more than several million degrees. The hydrogen became deuterium atoms and started to fuse through nuclear force and created thermonuclear energy and it became the Sun that we know.
The scientists believe the Sun is about halfway through its life’s expectancy. By nuclear fusion reactions in its core, it fuses hydrogen into helium. The Sun is gradually becoming hotter during this time of its main development, because the helium atoms in the core occupy less volume than the hydrogen atoms that were fused. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, and make a stronger gravitational force.
Today’s scientists observed and believe that our sun has 74.9% hydrogen, and 23.8% helium, and has 700 million times more mass than all other planets added together in our solar system. Also, Einstein whispered that the Sun’s mass puts more dent in the space-time curvature.
As you can realize, everything that you have read above is all mechanics with no explanation of any source. It’s all speculation, with no sign of evolved nature. It is unrealistic for scientists of physics to describe the forming of our Sun differently from the other suns.
NOTE: Accretion’s law of quantum physics does not support creation of the universe as an accidental event by the four dumb forces of the Big Bang theory. When the BB theorists pronounced it, it was for a one galaxy universe, not for billons of galaxies of the universe we know today. Thus, the theory of the formation of the sun is limited to our Sun only.
How the Sun was formed
(My version from a panpsychist quantum perspective)
Everything in the Universe is following the nature of panpsychist quantum law, because the Universe is made of the fundamental building blocks of panpsychist elementary particles. This is the law of physics that we know. There are no flaws, no exceptions, no mistakes, and no improper functions in the law of quantum physics. If there is something that is a mystery to us, it is just because we don’t know the proper version of the source of the quantum particle of it; otherwise it is not hard to understand. The suns with their massive bodies are created from the same principle of quantum accretion that created the whole Universe, and therefore they cannot be an exception when the whole Universe started from Panpsychist Quantum Constituent Elementary Particles (PQCEP).
My perception of the creation of a sun is not just limited to our sun, or our solar system, it is applied to all several hundred billion galaxies’ of suns, where each galaxy is hosting several billions of suns or solar systems. Each sun must pass through a precise routine to become a complete sun. Suns at their very first moment are formed from one atom and, based on the accumulation of the suns’ hydrogen, they become hotter and larger.
It is like us, at the first moment in our mother’s womb, one DNA multiplied itself repeatedly to create us. And for the sun’s version, it gathers its atoms one by one to create a sun.
In the future we will learn that each solar system is forming very much the same way and even the galaxies are formed in a similar outline, because the elements of each galaxy are the same and they are all inside the Universe. Imagine the Universe as a tree and all the galaxies are its fruit, and all the fruit grow the same way, yet none of the fruit are the same.
The personality and character of any sun is described as follows: All suns are collectors and are attracted to a particular hydrogen of its own kind of atom that is special for that specific sun only. Suns are the lightest component in the Universe, because they are made of the lightest elements. They are the creators of unprecedented spacewaves and temperature. They are made of their own hydrogen and they create their own helium. Their hydrogen creates photons and the photons are accumulated inside the sun’s body to create their high temperature with high frequency and short wavelengths to become denser energy “gamma rays”. Suns are in the center of numerous planets which are going around them to protect the sun (the queen) from any intruders. They are situated in such a manner to support and protect all the life in their region. They have a negative gravity force, or reverse gravity, which does not allow any intruder to come into their territory because of this negative gravity personality.
As you can see, everything I’ve mentioned for a sun’s personality is different from what you’ve heard before. In two or more occasions they are exactly opposite of all that the scientist’s axiom implies. First, that all suns are the lightest mass component in the Universe, and second, that the sun is carrying a negative gravity. These unprecedented statements are the precise opposite of what the scientists taught us, and it even contradicts Albert Einstein’s theories as well. Additionally, suns are the creators of all the waves in the space of the Universe, not to mention that the S-H is different from our hydrogen here on Earth as is generally thought.
Don’t forget that all the planets in the Universe are weightless anyway, because of the Universe’s rotation, but they are still carrying their own mass and the mass of a sun is actually less than any planet.
The reason I mention the sun is the lightest mass is because it is made of a special hydrogen atom; also, we know a hydrogen atom has the lightest mass of any atom that mankind knows. It will scientifically be proven one day that the sun is made in such a way that it matches with all the laws of quantum physics, based on accretion of PQCEP as well as synchronicity of duality.
Let me briefly explain each of the Sun’s characters that I mentioned above.
Collector of the Special Hydrogen Atom
The structure of our hydrogen atom has brought a lot of tension and conflict among scientists because the normal hydrogen that we know cannot survive in the high temperature environment of a sun; therefore, there is uncertainty of what causes the sun to generate such high temperatures of energy for so long a period of time (billions of years). Yet we know the majority of the Sun’s volume is occupied by hydrogen.
The suns hydrogen atom is therefore different from the Earth’s hydrogen atom, because our Earth’s hydrogen atom cannot produce light with high temperature, nor can it survive in a sun’s high temperature. It breaks apart in a fraction of a moment in the million degrees of the temperature of a sun. Therefore, the Sun’s hydrogen must have a stronger gravity quark force inside the hadron to hold its electron, because if an atom loses its electron(s), it would not be an atom anymore, and the electron wouldn’t be an electron any longer. Not to mention that based on duality and the nature of the Universe, there must be a hydrogen atom to complement and support the hydrogen atom that is creating life.
The sun-hydrogen (S-H) atom has one electron and one major duty to perform, which is just producing photons to protect the life-hydrogen (L-H) that we know. This is the law of synchronicity of duality. The S-H is attracted to each other based on their *long gravity. At first the long gravity collects them and puts them together to make a cluster of a cloud of S-H. Since this cluster of S-H is in the “space” of the Universe it becomes a spherical shape and a sun is born. All the chemical elements in gas or liquid form, create a spherical shape anywhere in the space of the universe, due to the rotation of a spherical hollow universe and characteristics of space that make wave through temperature, i.e. raindrops, bubbles or atoms.
If we place some gas elements is a square glass container, we will see, the gas forms a spherical shape.
*Long Gravity in an atom is connecting or holding similar atoms like O2 of our atmosphere.
As the little sun is growing, the speed of collecting the S-H in the region gets faster and the layer of the spherical shape of the S-H inside the sun gets thicker and the temperature rises.
This process is following the law of accretion of S-H atoms, and all suns must follow this procedure to become a sun. This process takes a long time to become a larger sun. The S-H can produce sunlight for tens of billions of years, because the content of the hadron’s duty is to just produce heat to support life for all the planets in the galaxy
Suns are the Lightest element in the Universe
At the very first moment of creation, a special S-H atom started to create light. The S-H is very similar to our hydrogen here on Earth that we know, because it has just one electron; but inside the hadron, the elementary particle of strong gravity is performing with electrons in different forms to create photons. Since it has just one electron, it is considered as the lightest complete unit of the Universe. The S-H has a different characteristic behavior from the Earth’s hydrogen in quantum physics, therefore it is the lightest unit in the Universe.
The difference between L-H and S-H is the performance of one or more quarks of the elementary particles in the hadron; otherwise it has the same mass. In chemistry there are many atoms that have the same mass, but different characters in the hadron. It is called an Isotope.
This S-H seems that it has only one offspring which is carrying strong gravity force as well and can survive in the sun, it is called sun-helium (S-He). There is no indication of heavier elements other than the S-He atoms in the sun. The characteristic of both S-H and S-He also are different. S-H’s duty is to only make photons continuously. While the S-He’s duty is to protect the stability of the S-H by its positioning over the S-H in a sun, and additionally it is filtering and inspecting the sunlight for quality perfection before radiating out of the sun which in different sections of the sun releases different frequencies and wavelengths.
To demonstrate accretion of massless photons, using a magnify glass to unify or compact sunlight is a good example.
Creator of Space Wave
The source of the wave in the Universe is unknown by today’s science. In addition, we think the impact of the Big Bang created a wave that can travel at the speed of light to expand the space. In general, the “wave” in the Big Bang theory has never been mentioned before as a primary element that has a direct relationship to the life of an atom in the Universe.
The notion of any mechanical wave should be that it will fade or disappear after 14 billion years of traveling and expanding in the Universe’s space in an infinite platform. Even still, we are observing that there is no indication of a spreading or traveling wave in all directions in space.
Meanwhile, we are continuously witnessing that a variety of waves exist in the space of the Universe that makes us think that the wave is still being produced in the space of the Quantum Universe.
When we reconcile these two paragraphs above, it makes it clear that wave and temperature exist in a galaxy together and they are corresponding to each other. Fundamentally, there is no spot in the galaxy without wave, even in an atom, because an atom occupies the space of a galaxy.
In the earlier 1900’s, some physicists had become reconciled with wave-particle duality and proposed that particles such as an electron or nuclei would have wavelike properties; but unfortunately, all these exhibits have been forgotten for more than half a century. The quantum wave length should be studied further, because these waves in the atom do exist. I am very optimistic that in the near future science will reveal many unknown concepts in the quantum field; but in particular the discovery of the communication tools of the wave inside an atom will be one of the most unprecedented remarks that my theory has presented.
Furthermore, we really don’t know much about the source of this phenomenon of the wave in space, but it is the source of all the communication between everything in the Universe. For example, all our senses are transmitted with wave inside our body, and all the atoms in our body survive with wave through pressure and temperature. Therefore, this natural remark of wave must be involved with everything and even the creation of all spherical shapes in the Universe including the atom.
The existing wave in the hadron must be one of the first primary functions in the hadron after the creation of space. My belief is that all atoms are carrying a wavelike property in the hadron for a communication tool between the center and the electron(s). Our bodies, which collectively are created by atoms and molecules, and that are the source of our existence, are controlled by wave.
There is no doubt that the sun is creating a variety of high frequency waves with short wavelength for the photons to travel at high speeds for long distances to deliver life support for far away planets (like from our Sun to the planet Neptune) that the actual heat of the Sun cannot reach directly as it does for our Earth.
Scientists think that the sunlight can travel at the same speed of light to infinite. But the sunlight would be exhausted eventually, because nothing can travel to infinite. Even the gamma ray, as it is traveling, would lose its energy through the cold space in the long run and will convert to sunlight (visible light) in the far distance in the galaxy. This phenomenon, that sunlight will be exhausted after a long distance of travel, is unprecedented and has never been mentioned and tested, though scientists detected gamma-rays billions of miles away from the sun, but logically it makes scientific sense that, as heat is traveling through cold space, it loses temperature.
Photons are energy in the form of temperature and any energy that travels with the wave releases its energy through friction with the very cold space between the planets. The reality is that as soon as the high frequency and short wavelength reaches out from the direct region of a sun, it would start to lose its original frequency and wavelength.
The science of physics has proven that any wave will lose its oscillation after a while of traveling. Think of a radio wave that would fade as it is traveling. This is the law of physics that any wave with friction will lose speed, and any heat wave will lose temperature as it travels. Any speed with wave will exhaust itself ultimately. It would be a disaster if the sunlight could travel to infinite, because then there would not be that many galaxies in the Universe. The whole Universe would be one huge unorganized, one-galaxy,Universe. Furthermore, to extend this thought, if the sunlight could travel to infinite, the Universe would not have an inside or an outside.
To put the sun’s energy in laymen’s terms, a cooler box is a good example. After a certain period of time, a heated object loses temperature and ice will gain temperature, or both of them will adapt to the environments’ temperature. Think of the ice as the space of the Universe and the photon as a hot object.
Negative Gravity
It is a shocking statement for the world of cosmology to say that the suns have a negative gravity, while all the scientists are saying that the sun’s strong gravity is holding all the planets around it. But, in reality, the only way for the sun to stay alive for billions of years, is that it must have negative gravity to survive.
When it mentions gravity, it means the unification in the atoms which sorts the elements in the formation of the planets or suns; because we have already rejected Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of gravity. Read my book for detail.
So, the gravity of the Sun (or suns) is opposite the Earth’s sorting element gravity. It means the suns’ gravity would place all the lightest elements in the center of the sun as opposed to the heavier elements that center themselves in the earthlike planets.
If we cut our Sun into two halves, from the center to the crest of the skin, the order of progression would be: photons (no mass), S-H, S-He, and the remaining heavier elements which are less than 2% such as Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively would be at the outer surface.
Therefore, anything heavier than the S-H or helium is rejected and expelled out of the region by the high temperatures of the sun. Sometimes we can even see with special filtered lenses the Sun-flares miles (Km’s) above the surface of the Sun because of this reason. The Sun’s nature is to get rid of elements such as carbon, oxygen, neon, and iron or any other heavier element out of its surface or its territory. Any element besides the S-H and S-He in a sun represents an impurity or an infection of the sun. The main reason is because any chemical element that we know would kill the sun’s function if it reached the center. Suns are very smart and sensitive regarding the impurity of our chemical elements. They know that if any heavy elements reach inside of them, it would kill them. This is the nature of a sun, anything that L-H is making, is poison for them.
Each photon, as S-H, is creating just has fractional part of the photon is not as complete as sun rays, and it does not have enough temperature to travel very far away nor does it have high frequency or wavelength to keep its high temperature; therefore, it takes a long time to be inclusive in the sun for the accretion’s process. The sun wants to make a comprehensive variation of sun beams that all the planets around it can get the equal benefit from. The high heat mysteriously is compacted in very high frequency and very short wavelengths that can skip through S-H at first, and then can pass through more compact atoms of the S-He and finally come out of the sun.
The strangest part of this event is the accretion of the photons. It is when most of the photons are packed by millions of degrees of temperature into a single form, where the heat becomes invisible into the very high frequency and very short wavelength that can pass through S-He. Yet some would not be able to do this task and are left behind, but they still hold very high temperature. The only reason this occurrence is happening is because of the synchronicity duality principles that even exist in the photons. The photons are divided into different forms.
One version can get the heat of millions of degrees of temperature in invisibleform into high frequency and short wavelengths that can carry heat for billions of miles (km) to the most remote planet in that solar system. The second version of the photons would get very high heat in visibleform in its mass-less form that we call photons. The idea of very high frequency and short wavelength is that the heat is sitting inside the wave, and this wave can carry its heat for a long journey.
The sunlight that we observe daily must go through thousands of procedures and thousands of years to be complete. Then with so much inspection and filtering, finally after it passes these qualifications then it can be released from the Sun.
These two (visible) photon and wave-photon (invisible), are synergistic and complement each other all the time. The most common one is when wave sunlight is coming out of the sun. First, the visible photon is escorting it until it loses its energy and then, secondly, the wave photon alone runs its energy for the long journey in the cold space of the Universe.
The Sun is the Creator of Wave-Temperature
The source of wave in space surely originates from the suns, because wave and temperature always are together and these two cannot be separated from each other. As we know the sun is creating temperature and therefore also creating wave. This topic has its own explanation in my book.
How the S-Hydrogen is situated in the Sun
The best metaphor to picture the inside of the sun is a coconut. The dark shell of the coconut is layers of S-He, the white part (meat) is S-H, and the hollow inside of the coconut is occupied by photons.
As the number of S-H is increased by accretion, the sun is growing, but when the heat rises to a certain point then the S-H needs more protection. The intelligent sun will start to make a special helium atom from two S-H to protect the sun’s heat and keep the S-H uniform inside the sun for three major reasons.
The most important one is that as the heat is going up, the heat makes the S-H unstable and it is hard for S-H to stay in the proper position while it is making photons. Here the nature of the sun’s growth creates helium atoms from two S-H atoms to stay over the sun’s surface to manage the S-H. The helium atom has two electrons and these two electrons are bonded together by a stronger gravity force; therefore, it is a more compacted atom than a hydrogen atom, furthermore, the space inside the helium is thicker where S-H cannot escape, due to the size of helium. Since the sun has reverse gravity, the helium atom with more mass, is staying above the S-H like a net around the S-H to hold them consistently. Earlier I mentioned suns are like a coconut. So, the sun’s skin (helium atoms) is getting thicker and stronger for more protection and to filter sunlight accurately for longer distances.
The second reason is that the helium is playing as a protector of S-H and it does not let anything interfere with the S-H’s duty. Therefore, the sun does not let any comets or foreign objects land on its surface, because the sun’s gravitation is calibrated through the surface’s flame and incinerates the intruder comets or others before they can reach the sun’s surface.
The third reason is that the sun will not allow any incomplete photons to go out of the sun, and that is controlled by certain layers of the helium through a filtering process for longer distance planets and moons.
The color of a sun is an indication of many things, the most important one is that the S-H has a high variation for different purposes. Another indication of the color of a sun is the age of the sun, or impurities, layers of S-H, S-He and many other unknown factors. However, no purple sun has been observed if nuclear fusion in a sun exists. As you are perceiving, suns are made of specific atoms that have never been mentioned anywhere before.
My observation of our Sun, for the size and energy that our Sun is producing, is that it is actually very calm; but scientists are saying that in the sun’s center, there is nuclear fusion that creates the sun’s heat, and which has enormous mass and gravity.
It is very easy to rejectthe theory that a nuclear fusion is happening in the center of the sun, and that the sun has a tremendous mass and gravity in the center. It is obvious that such hydrogen nuclear fusion cannot exist in such a high temperature environment for billions of years without any initiative, nor will it keep doing so for another four billion years or more without any source and motivation. There is no strong endorsement in the science of physics to back up such a nuclear fusion theory to power a sun such as:
* Nothing in the Universe is working mechanically, as Einstein is stating. The strong gravity theory of Einstein would attract heavy elements into the sun and kill the sun right away.
* A strong gravity does not make any scientific sense in a sun. Or mechanical gravity as it is described as a pulling force that applies at certain distances, and not by multi-distances for all the planets and moons in our solar system.
* A big mass in the center of a sun does not make any sense, when over 98% of the Sun is made of hydrogen and helium atoms.
* Big mass and strong gravity (conventional thinking) would not let the Sun’s equator move faster than its two poles; according to Einstein’s theory of gravity, each part of a planet is pulled by the same gravity source equally.
* The strong gravity would not let any heavier element, such as iron, stay on the top surface of the Sun moving freely. The strong gravity would pull heavier elements into the Sun’s center, i.e. heavier elements on the earth sink to the center.
* The nuclear fusion in the center of the sun is not following the law of physics; because nuclear-fusion can produce heat once but can not survive in that heat. Nuclear-fusion in the sun’s core would have such impact that it would show many things; such as, expansion or contraction of the sun’s body for short periods of time. It should show these effects on the surface, but it does not.
* Scientists have recorded a sonogram of the Sun, and the energy that it is generating, is actually considered to be a quiet, calm star.
The only conclusion and practical theory would be that the Universe is a complete well-organized universe in which its suns are following quantum accretion of photons that is created by S-H utilizing quantum principles.
My speculation is that from the center of the sun, about 45% of its radius is occupied by photons, no mass. The remainder would be about 35% hydrogen and the rest of the 20% would be all helium and heavy elements on surface.
This is the actual structure of the Sun. If there are any other elements, besides hydrogen and helium, they are not part of the sun. They are polluting the sun and the sun wants to be liberated from them.
Suns are situated somehow that all the planets around a sun want to protect it; therefore, it is rare for an intruder such as a comet or asteroid to reach the sun. However, it is not completely unheard of either for a comet to get to the sun. As much as the planets around the Sun are protecting the Sun, the Sun as well, is protecting them by a variety of wave frequencies and wavelengths of sunlight.
For example: The gamma-ray or X-ray is a tool of the sun to destroy big comets from far away in space, because most of the comets have ingredients of water or light chemical elements inside, destroyed by gamma-rays. The same gamma-ray can travel to the farthest planet to support life as visible light.
The north and south poles above the sun’s surface have higher temperatures than the middle surface of the sun. Any comet is rejected and dissolved by the corona’s high heat and the gamma rays disrupting the atoms and molecules in space before contact with the sun. This is the way that an intelligent sun is protecting itself, so to speak. This is the best scenario, but sometimes they reach the sun anyway; for example, our sun has some residue of these comets over its surface. However, our Sun has less than 2% of infectious elements.
But it is very interesting that, if any S-H or cluster of S-H is within the territory of a sun, it would tend to go towards the hotter sun or to the bigger sun’s direction without any interference because eventually it would merge with the sun through accretion and make the sun hotter and bigger. How these S-H is going inside of the sun, my speculation is from the coronal area, where the single photon is generated.
The indication of planets going around a sun, or moons around planets is the hard evidence that the Universe is well organization with accurate structure to place everything in an orderly fashion to its will. Simply the Universe is an intelligent entity with an evolutionary journey, not an accidental explosion.
What is a Sun’s obligation?
The sun’s compulsion is to provide life for all the planets in its orbit, it does not matter how far they are from the sun. The planets are never formed until the host sun can provide and guarantee the life support for them.
The nature of a solar system is this: as the sun is getting bigger, more heat generates, and at the same time mysteriously more planets start to form and go around the sun. This is the nature of growing.
There are many factors that exist, but one of my strongest hypotheses is that the friction of a galaxy’s rotation with space would create two electromagnetic fields in which the two positive and negative fields would pull each other constantly. Furthermore, the original shape of all the galaxies is flat when they are formed in the Universe. (Further details are in my book).
Although all the complete and organized solar systems are flat and all the planets are going around a sun in this flat plane, my instinct is telling me, the reason that all the planets form on one plane around a sun is very simple, to stay alive. All the suns have a short window region located at the equator area; this is the only area where all the sun’s energy, complete photons and high frequency and short wavelengths are emitting out from the sun, which supports and sustains all life in the region.
The Suns’ Equatorial Window of Photons
As we know the photon is a bifurcation of two different categories. First, it is traveling by waves and second, it is traveling by a unity-photon to escort the sun’s wave.
The temperature on the surface of our Suns’ corona is millions of degrees different from the equator. Only the photon itself can get over a million visible degrees of temperature. But only the wave-photon can come out of the sun’s equatorial window; therefore, all the planets place themselves within this trajectory window.
When planets get this heat, they distribute it to the center of their body. This is the nature of the survival of planets. If the heat is more than enough, the planets store the excess energy inside the core for other usage, such as creating other elements or for future needs.
For example: if a planet is a gaseous planet, it is using the heat to create heavier elements in the core. Like Saturn, Jupiter or any gaseous cluster, at first, the light elements are pushed to the surface, and ultimately, they become a regular planet like Earth. For a better understanding of a comet read my book, The Quantum Mechanics Universe, in the corresponding chapter on H2O.
Why nature made the sun to function this way is proving the perfectionism of the Universe to bring this detail to our mind. Of course, it is hard to believe, but this is the best scientific explanation for all the solar systems in the Universe. Albert Einstein thought the flatness of our solar system is because of the Sun’s mass; therefore, he proposed his space-time platform, but the reality is, solar systems are formed on the equatorial line of their galaxies sun. This is very important to remember; each galaxy has a line that separates north from south. For the same reason every so many thousand/millions(?) of years, our earth changes its Polarity, due to the galaxies somersault movement within the Universe. (Details in my book).
How the Planets go around a Sun
When a sun starts to become a sun, the nature of atoms and molecules want to be close to the heat to stay alive. As the sun gets bigger, the heat is increased, and the dust ring of matter increases and starts to move around the sun keeping some distance. This cloud of dust would collapse and form a ring surrounding the young sun and eventually by weak and long gravity in the atoms it will collect dust in the pathway, and make a little planet, while the microgravity will sort all the matter and become a natural planet that goes around the sun. As the sun is getting bigger and creating more heat, the accretion of micro gravity and the accretion of spin make the rotation of the planets coordinate with the rotation of the Universe…and naturally planets are born. Again, as the sun is getting bigger, other planets form.
This is the very basics of forming a solar system that eventually create a larger solar system, which is following the natural law of quantum physics and accretion. There are thousands or millions of combinations accrued during the intercourse of the billions of years needed to form a solar system, but the basic ingredient is the accretion of panpsychist quantum elements.
The best example in our solar system, would be that the planet of Mercury was created first, and as the Sun got larger and hotter the planet of Venus formed second, and then the Earth…etc.
At one time the planet of Mercury may have had living species, like our Earth; but as the sun grew bigger, all the light elements such as water and the ingredients for life’s chemistry evaporated to Venus. And as the Sun grew bigger and hotter, the same scenario might have happened to Venus, and created the life on Earth. You never know, if the sun grows even hotter or bigger in the next few billion years, it might transfer all the light elements from Earth such as water, oxygen, and life organism to Mars.
This testimonial, that as the sun is getting bigger and hotter it makes the next planet develop living conditions, makes common sense. Additionally, it is making my theory that the suns have reverse gravity even stronger.
This is the standard of creation of a solar system. As the sun is getting larger and hotter, the electromagnetic force is getting stronger, and as a result the numbers of the planets are increased. The Sun has a little electromagnet force. Because of it the outer side has friction with the space wave.
It seems all the Big Bang fans believe that all the suns in the Universe are not more than 14 billion years old; but some of the suns are a million times bigger than our Sun and therefore, by the law of accretion, the Universe must be much older than we think.
How can Heat travel a long distance?
The sun is creating a variety of sun beams with low to high frequency and from long to short wavelengths. Each frequency belongs to certain planets or is traveling for a certain distance. For example: Gamma-ray can travel a longer distance than the X-ray. I believe they are quantum, non-electromagnetic waves, but this is beside my point, and I believe that in the future we will find the real quantum wave property inside of atoms.
NOTE: If quantum physics thinks that the electron with an electromagnetic field is creating photons, then all the rays must have electromagnetism and it would bring the speed of the photon to a halt by its polarity’s force.
The sun makes a variety of rays. Some are visible (very small proportions) that we are experimenting with on our Earth, but the majority of them cannot be seen by the naked eye such as ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays (extremely energetic with radiation); but they are all carrying light in different forms. These rays have high frequency and a very short wavelength, but still they are traveling at the speed of light with the body of wave while holding temperature inside.
Generally, sunlight is slowed down when it is coming into the Earth’s atmosphere, or into water; therefore, it is also slowed down in the very cold of space and when it is traveling for long distances (billions of km or miles). It is the nature of the sun’s beam to lose its energy or convert into another variation of energy.
NOTE: If any of us were exposed to just one second of high frequency and short wavelengths (gamma-rays), we would not notice it for a minute, but then we would feel as though it was burning through our skin to our bones.
Thus, the ultraviolet light becomes visible for some planets, and the X-ray gives life to the long-distance planets, and ultimately the Gamma-rays would support life for even more remote planets. This means that some of the planets that are the farthest away from the Sun get the same benefit from the sunlight that the closer planets are getting. This principle would apply to even farther away planets such as the blue planet of Neptune and Pluto.
FYI: Life is created by the right size of an atom, and sometimes the distance from a sun is not the subject, but the size of an atom matters.
Conclusion: The principle of each sun in a solar system is based on the equilibrium between producing energy and conserving energy. Suns create a product that has no-volume, no-mass, and no-shadow, but have visible/invisible properties called Photons. Photons are the creation of S-H. At first this photon has a little energy that shows itself by a golden color. This photon mysteriously merges with other photons and they condense themselves to a very high frequency and very short wavelengths and inexplicably come out of the sun in an invisible form, while some unify and show themselves with high temperature and are visible. The Sun’s duty is to use these two kinds of photons to deliver them in the right manner to support all the atoms in all its planets and moons.
On the other hand, all the planets are receiving this energy. They conserve it by absorbing it through their surface and sending the heat to the center of the planet or moon.
The equilibrium of this production and conservation of energy is the principle of each solar system, whole galaxies, and ultimately the whole universe. Simply, nothing is wasted in a quantum intelligent universe.
Sofia Williams added a reply:
The solar system is defined as a system of the Sun and the celestial bodies under its gravitational influence. These include the eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets and cosmic dust and gas. As the primary star, the Sun accounts for 99.86 per cent of the total mass and exerts a gravitational influence that binds the surrounding celestial bodies in orbit.
The fundamental principle underlying the operation of the solar system is the law of gravity. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths that adhere to the principles set forth by Kepler. The planets exhibit disparate periods of rotation and revolution, which are shaped by a range of factors, including their own mass and their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, the material within the solar system is maintained in dynamic equilibrium by the combined forces of gravity, kinetic energy and orbital mechanics.
Furthermore, the solar system is subject to external influences, including the interstellar medium and the gravitational influence of other galaxies. In summary, the solar system is a sophisticated and dynamic astronomical system that exemplifies the fundamental laws of celestial motion and gravitational interaction.
Arne Andersen added a reply:
Your post seems to lack a basic understanding of modern physics? To take the very simplest: Hydrogen atoms can fuse together to form helium. It is what keeps the sun warm. The helium atom is lighter than the hydrogen atoms that formed it. The difference in weight has become energy, in accordance with the well-known formula E=MC2. A colossal pressure is required to push hydrogen into helium. Such a pressure exists quite naturally in a star due to gravity. On Earth, we have achieved the same thing inside an atomic bomb, which acts as a primer for a hydrogen bomb. Where much of the explosive power comes from atoms being pressed together. (Unlike the atomic bomb, atoms are shot into pieces. The pieces are lighter than the starting atom, the rest becomes heat energy) There are constant attempts to force hydrogen together in a "peaceful way", the difficulty is to create the same pressure and temperature as in the interior of the sun.
Srinivas Kasulla added a reply:
Abbas Kashani The solar system is a vast cosmic neighborhood centered around the Sun. It consists of eight planets, countless asteroids, comets, and dwarf planets. The Sun, a massive star, is the gravitational center holding everything together. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths, with distances varying from Mercury's close proximity to Neptune's distant orbit. The solar system is also home to the Kuiper Belt, a region beyond Neptune filled with icy bodies, and the Oort Cloud, a distant sphere of comets. The Sun's energy, primarily in the form of light and heat, drives the climate and weather on the planets, making it essential for life as we know it.
Hasan Altawil added a reply:
The solar system consists of the Sun at its center, surrounded by eight planets, their moons, and other celestial objects such as asteroids and comets. It operates through the gravitational pull of the Sun, which keeps the planets in orbit. Each planet follows an elliptical path around the Sun, with inner planets moving faster than the outer ones. The system is also governed by physical laws, such as Newton’s law of gravity and Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, which explain the interactions and movements of the objects within it. The Sun provides the necessary energy, driving processes like the Earth’s climate and supporting life.
Miller Bess added a reply:
Hello Abbas.
I believe that the solar system is a complex gravitational system dominated by the sun, with the eight planets, dwarf planets, asteroids, comets and other celestial bodies constantly rotating and revolving under the sun's gravitational pull. Individual objects maintain orbital equilibrium through their mutual gravitational pull, and the solar system is in a constant state of change and evolution over time.
What simple ways do we humans pollute our vegetation without knowing? Just simple behavioural patterns that looks normal but when properly assessed actually harm plant biodiversity. Thanks.
What is the solar system like? And how does it work?
The building blocks of the Universe is a Panpsychist Quantum phenomenon. This unprecedented statement places us to where Quantum Mechanics become obsolete. To claim this spectacle of a statement, it would change our perception of an unintelligent mechanical universe to an evolutionary universe with a journey. This point of view would apply to every single element of our universe and suns cannot be an exception.
The knowledge that we have of our sun and its ingredients is all physical. We know our Sun has over 98% Hydrogen and Helium, but the Hydrogen and Helium that we know here on Earth cannot produce heat of millions of degrees, continuously, for billions of years. The reality is, the hydrogen that we know, cannot survive for a moment in such heat. Another question is the gravity of the sun. If the Sun has massive gravity, then why can it not hold the whole of its body at the same rate of velocity, because each section of its body rotates at many different speeds. Or, if it is the heaviest planet, then why is it made of the lightest elements known of the periodic table? The formation of a sun is another mystery and the rotation of planets in a plane is another big question mark. But by using the Panpsychist Quantum principles all these questions can be answered.
Key words: Sun-hydrogen, Sun formation, sun’s gravity, sun’s energy, planet rotation, sun rotation, quantum photon energy.
THE SUN
If we ask a toddler to draw a sun, he or she will draw a circle with some lines sticking out around the circle. The lines are representing the sunlight that is coming out of the sun and nothing is going in. This is the exact character of any sun; energy is coming out of the sun and nothing goes into the sun.
We ought to accept the fact that the Universe has been designed to create and survive the old-fashioned way, in a sense, we are duplicating the Universe. We are both made of the same chemical elements and each chemical element must have the same structure to follow, and that without temperature does not exist. Therefore, it brings us to the concept of creating life and supporting life.
To investigate the foundation of life (all species and vegetation), we would end up that life consists of a few atoms and molecules, and these atoms and molecules wouldn’t exist without temperature. The deeper explanation of life is the visibility of all mass conservation of energy. Simply nothing exists without temperature. The ‘life’ is started with a composite of the smallest complete entity unit of the universe, it is pronounced ATOM.
The chart of all the elements of the periodic table is hard evidence that each atom is presenting the exact character of that specific atom. Each atom is carrying its own mass, number of electron(s), size, color, taste, odor, the boiling/freeze point, chemical reaction, performing certain characteristic behavior, and each is holding specific information, and each has an evolutionary journey to create heavier atoms or molecules and ultimately life. Therefore, to achieve their consistency, they need environmental stability with some sort of support, nothing but right energy or temperature. Each atom conserves energy through nature where friction is no subject in an atom’s body. Simply, an atom does not work mechanically. This unprecedented statement discards Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentally.
As we know the strongest, smallest ancestor of every chemical element is the hydrogen atom, where each hydrogen atom is the composite of many unknown numbers of panpsychist quantum particles. Fortunately, we are aware of many types of isotope hydrogen. Yet the hydrogen that we know on earth has a natural journey to make heavier elements (PT). This hydrogen can not be in two places at the same time; therefore, it has the complementary partner to support its expedition. This duality exists in everything in the Universe.
SUN-HYDROGEN
Or
S-H
When and how is a Sun created?
We are going to determined how a sun appears in the Universe and how it is holding itself to survive for hundreds of billions of years with the harmony of the universe quantum nature concept. Suns are the only source of energy in a galaxy, in a sense, it is supporting life in the galaxy.
Sunlight or photons, the product of a sun, is mass-less and travel on a straight line; not forever, because, the nature of the space of the Universe is cold and absorbs energy as it is traveling. Therefore, the high frequency and short wavelength of the sunlight as it’s traveling, loses its energy in the course of billions of miles. The frequency and wavelength of sunlight is designed to support all its planets in its system; thus, finally it is exhausted on the rim of the galaxy. For the same reason the planets in the system are visible, and for the same reason each galaxy in the space of the universe is observed separately.
Suns are smart by nature. As the planets are circling a sun, the sun provides them energy. Sunlight’s duty is to carry and transfer photons (energy) from a sun to each of its planets by different wave lengths. Since it is mass-less it is not affected by anything, not even by the *gravity that most scientists think of; it is, however, affected by going through the long journey of cold space. The Sun is giving visibility and energy to all its surrounding planets, and for the same reason we are able to see and observe the most remote planets.
*See my Gravity is a Myth article or Gravity Is Internal.
But deep inside any sun there are tremendous functions at play that connect all the elements of the atoms in the Universe together, which is way beyond our imagination, because suns are creators of something that we never thought of before.
How much do we know scientifically about a sun? Or are the things that we think we know about the Sun true?
Well, there are some facts that no one can deny, such as: The Sun’s diameter is about 109 times bigger than the Earth and the rotation of the Sun is different from the Earth because it consists of more than 98% of the lightest known elements such as hydrogen and helium. It is like a large hot air balloon of light gas without the balloon itself. The surface of the Sun does not have a boundary; therefore, each part of the Sun has a different speed of rotation, due to its ingredient of a large fragile cloud of a light element.
For instance: the spot on the equator (the large circle) of the Sun, takes 24.47 Earth days to rotate once around or come to the same position; but as you go north or south from the equator, the rotation goes slower. The Sun’s South and North Poles take 38 days to rotate one cycle. These two speeds of rotation are telling us that the Sun does not have a solid body like the Earth, instead it is a hollow sphere with very light gas inside. So, the Sun’s skin is like a flaming ocean that at the equator runs faster than any other area of the Sun. These two speeds have been observed and measured, by an optical telescope, as sunspots that are moving across the Sun’s surface.
The Sun’s temperature varies in different sections; it can reach 6000 to 20,000 degrees centigrade on the surface depending on the region. The temperature of the outer surface of the Sun (corona) is about 1,000,000-2,000,000K, and some parts even go up to about 8,000,000K. This is all fact.
But, when it comes to when the Sun was created, how the Sun was born, what is inside the Sun, or how the sun is generating its energy with golden sunlight, then everything becomes speculation because no one knows for sure, when, how or what is going on inside a Sun.
Let me bring up a few examples and then you will realize how complicated the Sun is for scientists.
The most common one is that we assume that our Sun formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and that it has not changed dramatically in its existence. Scientists also think that our Sun is now about middle-aged and has another 5 billion years to go.
Since 1904 until now, there are so many variations of theories that exist, that when you want to know about the Sun, you get confused; because each scientist has his/her own theory and when you compare them to each other, each one contradicts the other.
One of the main theories would be that a nuclear fusion reaction in the Sun’s core creates the powerful energy of the Sun. Most scientists believe that most of the Sun’s life energy is produced by this nuclear fusion in the core region. This theory is supported by a group of top scientists around the world, including Albert Einstein. Mr. Einstein has related that the source of the Sun’s energy output to be equivalent to his mass-energy formula of E=mc2. How this nuclear fusion is taking place though is a mystery and no one can explain it.
They believe that the core is the only region in the Sun that produces a substantial amount of thermal energy through nuclear fusion. 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by the time it reaches 30% of the radius, the fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers. Finally, it is transferred to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space as sunlight or the kinetic energy of particles. The core has a density of about 150 times the density of water and temperatures can reach close to 15.7 million degrees Kelvin. By contrast, the sun’s surface temperature is about 5800K at the equator.
This is one of the major theories that have existed for more than one hundred years and most cosmologists believe it strongly. Also, by recent studies, they believe that the Sun is composed of two of the lightest chemical elements of the periodic table. Hydrogen is holding 74.9% and helium accounts for 23.8% of the mass of the Sun. The remaining elements, which consist of less than 2%, are Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively.
Furthermore, the nuclear fusion in the Sun's core has modified the composition by converting hydrogen into helium, so the Sun’s innermost portion is now roughly 60% helium, with the abundance of heavier elements unchanged. The Sun’s death will occur after the hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped. Then the sun will collapse into itself.
All this that has been mentioned about the nuclear fusion inside the Sun and the life expectancy is just speculation and not definitive; but scientists strongly believe all the above because there is no other strong theory that exists. One thing is certain however, the content of the Sun is hydrogen and helium. All this information is just about our Sun that has been collected in the last few decades.
Unfortunately, there is so much information out there about our Sun, which in many ways contradicts each other, and many of which do not follow the laws of physics that we know, and they all have theoretical problems.
Theoretical Problems
The biggest problem of all is that the hydrogen element that we know here on Earth cannot survive at such high temperatures. It would rip apart in a fraction of a second at such temperatures. The question arises, how could a hydrogen atom in a sun create this tremendous energy (high temperature of millions of degrees) for billions of years? It does not fit into the physics that we know.
For producing photons, the electromagnetic force in the atom must generate these photons, but the inside of the Sun does not show any evidence of a large electromagnetic force. This is another reason why the electromagnetic force in the atoms has stayed put as a theory for more than half a century.
Also, the scientists think that the Sun is over 99% of the entire mass of the solar system because they believe our Sun is made of heavy-elements. But the Sun has more than 98% of two of the lightest elements in the periodic table, hydrogen and helium. So, what are these considered heavy-elements? No one has any clue.
Scientists think that the Sun’s energy is creating a lot of mass, because of Albert Einstein’s theory of E=mc², in which the energy of photons is producing mass, (a photon has no mass), while the mass itself is a mystery in our Universe. The scientists don’t know how matter got in the Universe, or how the Universe is gaining and producing a mass. But most important of all, is that they don’t know how the photon is created by the hydrogen atom continuously for billions of years, and how the hydrogen atom is surviving at that temperature of millions of degrees. Another theoretical problem is with the energy that the Sun has been producing for more than 4 billion years continuously through nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun. This does not make any scientific sense, because nuclear fusion that we know creates tremendous heat, with ultraviolet rays not photons, and the energy is accrued one time not continuously, but there is no such color or indication of action of nuclear fusion in the sun. Also, if a sun has tremendous gravity, then why does it have different speeds in different sections of its body? Or why are comets and asteroids rejected by the sun through its flaming?
As you can see, the Sun is a very complicated star that we really don’t know much about, because everything that the scientists are thinking reveals that one side of the equation does not match with other side of the equation.
How the Sun was formed
(According to today’s scientists)
At first, I would recommend you go to social media and search for “how the Sun was formed” then you will get more familiar with our Sun. Not to mention that most of the theories are about ourSun, not any other suns, because the scientists didn’t go that far.
Here is a concise belief and general idea of how our Sun was created from the scientist’s point of view.
The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a large gravitational collapsing cloud of gas inside an interstellar cloud. This cloud was pulled by a supernova for several million years before the collapse, and then it became a rotating disk with a large central knot where most of the mass is concentrated in the center. With high gravity and pressure in the region it flattened out into a disk and eventually it created planets and our Solar system’s body was shaped. And later, all the planets were formed.
The central knot continued to collapse under its own strong gravity force; it caused the interior of the Sun’s temperatures to soar, more than several million degrees. The hydrogen became deuterium atoms and started to fuse through nuclear force and created thermonuclear energy and it became the Sun that we know.
The scientists believe the Sun is about halfway through its life’s expectancy. By nuclear fusion reactions in its core, it fuses hydrogen into helium. The Sun is gradually becoming hotter during this time of its main development, because the helium atoms in the core occupy less volume than the hydrogen atoms that were fused. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, and make a stronger gravitational force.
Today’s scientists observed and believe that our sun has 74.9% hydrogen, and 23.8% helium, and has 700 million times more mass than all other planets added together in our solar system. Also, Einstein whispered that the Sun’s mass puts more dent in the space-time curvature.
As you can realize, everything that you have read above is all mechanics with no explanation of any source. It’s all speculation, with no sign of evolved nature. It is unrealistic for scientists of physics to describe the forming of our Sun differently from the other suns.
NOTE: Accretion’s law of quantum physics does not support creation of the universe as an accidental event by the four dumb forces of the Big Bang theory. When the BB theorists pronounced it, it was for a one galaxy universe, not for billons of galaxies of the universe we know today. Thus, the theory of the formation of the sun is limited to our Sun only.
How the Sun was formed
(My version from a panpsychist quantum perspective)
Everything in the Universe is following the nature of panpsychist quantum law, because the Universe is made of the fundamental building blocks of panpsychist elementary particles. This is the law of physics that we know. There are no flaws, no exceptions, no mistakes, and no improper functions in the law of quantum physics. If there is something that is a mystery to us, it is just because we don’t know the proper version of the source of the quantum particle of it; otherwise it is not hard to understand. The suns with their massive bodies are created from the same principle of quantum accretion that created the whole Universe, and therefore they cannot be an exception when the whole Universe started from Panpsychist Quantum Constituent Elementary Particles (PQCEP).
My perception of the creation of a sun is not just limited to our sun, or our solar system, it is applied to all several hundred billion galaxies’ of suns, where each galaxy is hosting several billions of suns or solar systems. Each sun must pass through a precise routine to become a complete sun. Suns at their very first moment are formed from one atom and, based on the accumulation of the suns’ hydrogen, they become hotter and larger.
It is like us, at the first moment in our mother’s womb, one DNA multiplied itself repeatedly to create us. And for the sun’s version, it gathers its atoms one by one to create a sun.
In the future we will learn that each solar system is forming very much the same way and even the galaxies are formed in a similar outline, because the elements of each galaxy are the same and they are all inside the Universe. Imagine the Universe as a tree and all the galaxies are its fruit, and all the fruit grow the same way, yet none of the fruit are the same.
The personality and character of any sun is described as follows: All suns are collectors and are attracted to a particular hydrogen of its own kind of atom that is special for that specific sun only. Suns are the lightest component in the Universe, because they are made of the lightest elements. They are the creators of unprecedented spacewaves and temperature. They are made of their own hydrogen and they create their own helium. Their hydrogen creates photons and the photons are accumulated inside the sun’s body to create their high temperature with high frequency and short wavelengths to become denser energy “gamma rays”. Suns are in the center of numerous planets which are going around them to protect the sun (the queen) from any intruders. They are situated in such a manner to support and protect all the life in their region. They have a negative gravity force, or reverse gravity, which does not allow any intruder to come into their territory because of this negative gravity personality.
As you can see, everything I’ve mentioned for a sun’s personality is different from what you’ve heard before. In two or more occasions they are exactly opposite of all that the scientist’s axiom implies. First, that all suns are the lightest mass component in the Universe, and second, that the sun is carrying a negative gravity. These unprecedented statements are the precise opposite of what the scientists taught us, and it even contradicts Albert Einstein’s theories as well. Additionally, suns are the creators of all the waves in the space of the Universe, not to mention that the S-H is different from our hydrogen here on Earth as is generally thought.
Don’t forget that all the planets in the Universe are weightless anyway, because of the Universe’s rotation, but they are still carrying their own mass and the mass of a sun is actually less than any planet.
The reason I mention the sun is the lightest mass is because it is made of a special hydrogen atom; also, we know a hydrogen atom has the lightest mass of any atom that mankind knows. It will scientifically be proven one day that the sun is made in such a way that it matches with all the laws of quantum physics, based on accretion of PQCEP as well as synchronicity of duality.
Let me briefly explain each of the Sun’s characters that I mentioned above.
Collector of the Special Hydrogen Atom
The structure of our hydrogen atom has brought a lot of tension and conflict among scientists because the normal hydrogen that we know cannot survive in the high temperature environment of a sun; therefore, there is uncertainty of what causes the sun to generate such high temperatures of energy for so long a period of time (billions of years). Yet we know the majority of the Sun’s volume is occupied by hydrogen.
The suns hydrogen atom is therefore different from the Earth’s hydrogen atom, because our Earth’s hydrogen atom cannot produce light with high temperature, nor can it survive in a sun’s high temperature. It breaks apart in a fraction of a moment in the million degrees of the temperature of a sun. Therefore, the Sun’s hydrogen must have a stronger gravity quark force inside the hadron to hold its electron, because if an atom loses its electron(s), it would not be an atom anymore, and the electron wouldn’t be an electron any longer. Not to mention that based on duality and the nature of the Universe, there must be a hydrogen atom to complement and support the hydrogen atom that is creating life.
The sun-hydrogen (S-H) atom has one electron and one major duty to perform, which is just producing photons to protect the life-hydrogen (L-H) that we know. This is the law of synchronicity of duality. The S-H is attracted to each other based on their *long gravity. At first the long gravity collects them and puts them together to make a cluster of a cloud of S-H. Since this cluster of S-H is in the “space” of the Universe it becomes a spherical shape and a sun is born. All the chemical elements in gas or liquid form, create a spherical shape anywhere in the space of the universe, due to the rotation of a spherical hollow universe and characteristics of space that make wave through temperature, i.e. raindrops, bubbles or atoms.
If we place some gas elements is a square glass container, we will see, the gas forms a spherical shape.
*Long Gravity in an atom is connecting or holding similar atoms like O2 of our atmosphere.
As the little sun is growing, the speed of collecting the S-H in the region gets faster and the layer of the spherical shape of the S-H inside the sun gets thicker and the temperature rises.
This process is following the law of accretion of S-H atoms, and all suns must follow this procedure to become a sun. This process takes a long time to become a larger sun. The S-H can produce sunlight for tens of billions of years, because the content of the hadron’s duty is to just produce heat to support life for all the planets in the galaxy
Suns are the Lightest element in the Universe
At the very first moment of creation, a special S-H atom started to create light. The S-H is very similar to our hydrogen here on Earth that we know, because it has just one electron; but inside the hadron, the elementary particle of strong gravity is performing with electrons in different forms to create photons. Since it has just one electron, it is considered as the lightest complete unit of the Universe. The S-H has a different characteristic behavior from the Earth’s hydrogen in quantum physics, therefore it is the lightest unit in the Universe.
The difference between L-H and S-H is the performance of one or more quarks of the elementary particles in the hadron; otherwise it has the same mass. In chemistry there are many atoms that have the same mass, but different characters in the hadron. It is called an Isotope.
This S-H seems that it has only one offspring which is carrying strong gravity force as well and can survive in the sun, it is called sun-helium (S-He). There is no indication of heavier elements other than the S-He atoms in the sun. The characteristic of both S-H and S-He also are different. S-H’s duty is to only make photons continuously. While the S-He’s duty is to protect the stability of the S-H by its positioning over the S-H in a sun, and additionally it is filtering and inspecting the sunlight for quality perfection before radiating out of the sun which in different sections of the sun releases different frequencies and wavelengths.
To demonstrate accretion of massless photons, using a magnify glass to unify or compact sunlight is a good example.
Creator of Space Wave
The source of the wave in the Universe is unknown by today’s science. In addition, we think the impact of the Big Bang created a wave that can travel at the speed of light to expand the space. In general, the “wave” in the Big Bang theory has never been mentioned before as a primary element that has a direct relationship to the life of an atom in the Universe.
The notion of any mechanical wave should be that it will fade or disappear after 14 billion years of traveling and expanding in the Universe’s space in an infinite platform. Even still, we are observing that there is no indication of a spreading or traveling wave in all directions in space.
Meanwhile, we are continuously witnessing that a variety of waves exist in the space of the Universe that makes us think that the wave is still being produced in the space of the Quantum Universe.
When we reconcile these two paragraphs above, it makes it clear that wave and temperature exist in a galaxy together and they are corresponding to each other. Fundamentally, there is no spot in the galaxy without wave, even in an atom, because an atom occupies the space of a galaxy.
In the earlier 1900’s, some physicists had become reconciled with wave-particle duality and proposed that particles such as an electron or nuclei would have wavelike properties; but unfortunately, all these exhibits have been forgotten for more than half a century. The quantum wave length should be studied further, because these waves in the atom do exist. I am very optimistic that in the near future science will reveal many unknown concepts in the quantum field; but in particular the discovery of the communication tools of the wave inside an atom will be one of the most unprecedented remarks that my theory has presented.
Furthermore, we really don’t know much about the source of this phenomenon of the wave in space, but it is the source of all the communication between everything in the Universe. For example, all our senses are transmitted with wave inside our body, and all the atoms in our body survive with wave through pressure and temperature. Therefore, this natural remark of wave must be involved with everything and even the creation of all spherical shapes in the Universe including the atom.
The existing wave in the hadron must be one of the first primary functions in the hadron after the creation of space. My belief is that all atoms are carrying a wavelike property in the hadron for a communication tool between the center and the electron(s). Our bodies, which collectively are created by atoms and molecules, and that are the source of our existence, are controlled by wave.
There is no doubt that the sun is creating a variety of high frequency waves with short wavelength for the photons to travel at high speeds for long distances to deliver life support for far away planets (like from our Sun to the planet Neptune) that the actual heat of the Sun cannot reach directly as it does for our Earth.
Scientists think that the sunlight can travel at the same speed of light to infinite. But the sunlight would be exhausted eventually, because nothing can travel to infinite. Even the gamma ray, as it is traveling, would lose its energy through the cold space in the long run and will convert to sunlight (visible light) in the far distance in the galaxy. This phenomenon, that sunlight will be exhausted after a long distance of travel, is unprecedented and has never been mentioned and tested, though scientists detected gamma-rays billions of miles away from the sun, but logically it makes scientific sense that, as heat is traveling through cold space, it loses temperature.
Photons are energy in the form of temperature and any energy that travels with the wave releases its energy through friction with the very cold space between the planets. The reality is that as soon as the high frequency and short wavelength reaches out from the direct region of a sun, it would start to lose its original frequency and wavelength.
The science of physics has proven that any wave will lose its oscillation after a while of traveling. Think of a radio wave that would fade as it is traveling. This is the law of physics that any wave with friction will lose speed, and any heat wave will lose temperature as it travels. Any speed with wave will exhaust itself ultimately. It would be a disaster if the sunlight could travel to infinite, because then there would not be that many galaxies in the Universe. The whole Universe would be one huge unorganized, one-galaxy,Universe. Furthermore, to extend this thought, if the sunlight could travel to infinite, the Universe would not have an inside or an outside.
To put the sun’s energy in laymen’s terms, a cooler box is a good example. After a certain period of time, a heated object loses temperature and ice will gain temperature, or both of them will adapt to the environments’ temperature. Think of the ice as the space of the Universe and the photon as a hot object.
Negative Gravity
It is a shocking statement for the world of cosmology to say that the suns have a negative gravity, while all the scientists are saying that the sun’s strong gravity is holding all the planets around it. But, in reality, the only way for the sun to stay alive for billions of years, is that it must have negative gravity to survive.
When it mentions gravity, it means the unification in the atoms which sorts the elements in the formation of the planets or suns; because we have already rejected Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of gravity. Read my book for detail.
So, the gravity of the Sun (or suns) is opposite the Earth’s sorting element gravity. It means the suns’ gravity would place all the lightest elements in the center of the sun as opposed to the heavier elements that center themselves in the earthlike planets.
If we cut our Sun into two halves, from the center to the crest of the skin, the order of progression would be: photons (no mass), S-H, S-He, and the remaining heavier elements which are less than 2% such as Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively would be at the outer surface.
Therefore, anything heavier than the S-H or helium is rejected and expelled out of the region by the high temperatures of the sun. Sometimes we can even see with special filtered lenses the Sun-flares miles (Km’s) above the surface of the Sun because of this reason. The Sun’s nature is to get rid of elements such as carbon, oxygen, neon, and iron or any other heavier element out of its surface or its territory. Any element besides the S-H and S-He in a sun represents an impurity or an infection of the sun. The main reason is because any chemical element that we know would kill the sun’s function if it reached the center. Suns are very smart and sensitive regarding the impurity of our chemical elements. They know that if any heavy elements reach inside of them, it would kill them. This is the nature of a sun, anything that L-H is making, is poison for them.
Each photon, as S-H, is creating just has fractional part of the photon is not as complete as sun rays, and it does not have enough temperature to travel very far away nor does it have high frequency or wavelength to keep its high temperature; therefore, it takes a long time to be inclusive in the sun for the accretion’s process. The sun wants to make a comprehensive variation of sun beams that all the planets around it can get the equal benefit from. The high heat mysteriously is compacted in very high frequency and very short wavelengths that can skip through S-H at first, and then can pass through more compact atoms of the S-He and finally come out of the sun.
The strangest part of this event is the accretion of the photons. It is when most of the photons are packed by millions of degrees of temperature into a single form, where the heat becomes invisible into the very high frequency and very short wavelength that can pass through S-He. Yet some would not be able to do this task and are left behind, but they still hold very high temperature. The only reason this occurrence is happening is because of the synchronicity duality principles that even exist in the photons. The photons are divided into different forms.
One version can get the heat of millions of degrees of temperature in invisibleform into high frequency and short wavelengths that can carry heat for billions of miles (km) to the most remote planet in that solar system. The second version of the photons would get very high heat in visibleform in its mass-less form that we call photons. The idea of very high frequency and short wavelength is that the heat is sitting inside the wave, and this wave can carry its heat for a long journey.
The sunlight that we observe daily must go through thousands of procedures and thousands of years to be complete. Then with so much inspection and filtering, finally after it passes these qualifications then it can be released from the Sun.
These two (visible) photon and wave-photon (invisible), are synergistic and complement each other all the time. The most common one is when wave sunlight is coming out of the sun. First, the visible photon is escorting it until it loses its energy and then, secondly, the wave photon alone runs its energy for the long journey in the cold space of the Universe.
The Sun is the Creator of Wave-Temperature
The source of wave in space surely originates from the suns, because wave and temperature always are together and these two cannot be separated from each other. As we know the sun is creating temperature and therefore also creating wave. This topic has its own explanation in my book.
How the S-Hydrogen is situated in the Sun
The best metaphor to picture the inside of the sun is a coconut. The dark shell of the coconut is layers of S-He, the white part (meat) is S-H, and the hollow inside of the coconut is occupied by photons.
As the number of S-H is increased by accretion, the sun is growing, but when the heat rises to a certain point then the S-H needs more protection. The intelligent sun will start to make a special helium atom from two S-H to protect the sun’s heat and keep the S-H uniform inside the sun for three major reasons.
The most important one is that as the heat is going up, the heat makes the S-H unstable and it is hard for S-H to stay in the proper position while it is making photons. Here the nature of the sun’s growth creates helium atoms from two S-H atoms to stay over the sun’s surface to manage the S-H. The helium atom has two electrons and these two electrons are bonded together by a stronger gravity force; therefore, it is a more compacted atom than a hydrogen atom, furthermore, the space inside the helium is thicker where S-H cannot escape, due to the size of helium. Since the sun has reverse gravity, the helium atom with more mass, is staying above the S-H like a net around the S-H to hold them consistently. Earlier I mentioned suns are like a coconut. So, the sun’s skin (helium atoms) is getting thicker and stronger for more protection and to filter sunlight accurately for longer distances.
The second reason is that the helium is playing as a protector of S-H and it does not let anything interfere with the S-H’s duty. Therefore, the sun does not let any comets or foreign objects land on its surface, because the sun’s gravitation is calibrated through the surface’s flame and incinerates the intruder comets or others before they can reach the sun’s surface.
The third reason is that the sun will not allow any incomplete photons to go out of the sun, and that is controlled by certain layers of the helium through a filtering process for longer distance planets and moons.
The color of a sun is an indication of many things, the most important one is that the S-H has a high variation for different purposes. Another indication of the color of a sun is the age of the sun, or impurities, layers of S-H, S-He and many other unknown factors. However, no purple sun has been observed if nuclear fusion in a sun exists. As you are perceiving, suns are made of specific atoms that have never been mentioned anywhere before.
My observation of our Sun, for the size and energy that our Sun is producing, is that it is actually very calm; but scientists are saying that in the sun’s center, there is nuclear fusion that creates the sun’s heat, and which has enormous mass and gravity.
It is very easy to rejectthe theory that a nuclear fusion is happening in the center of the sun, and that the sun has a tremendous mass and gravity in the center. It is obvious that such hydrogen nuclear fusion cannot exist in such a high temperature environment for billions of years without any initiative, nor will it keep doing so for another four billion years or more without any source and motivation. There is no strong endorsement in the science of physics to back up such a nuclear fusion theory to power a sun such as:
* Nothing in the Universe is working mechanically, as Einstein is stating. The strong gravity theory of Einstein would attract heavy elements into the sun and kill the sun right away.
* A strong gravity does not make any scientific sense in a sun. Or mechanical gravity as it is described as a pulling force that applies at certain distances, and not by multi-distances for all the planets and moons in our solar system.
* A big mass in the center of a sun does not make any sense, when over 98% of the Sun is made of hydrogen and helium atoms.
* Big mass and strong gravity (conventional thinking) would not let the Sun’s equator move faster than its two poles; according to Einstein’s theory of gravity, each part of a planet is pulled by the same gravity source equally.
* The strong gravity would not let any heavier element, such as iron, stay on the top surface of the Sun moving freely. The strong gravity would pull heavier elements into the Sun’s center, i.e. heavier elements on the earth sink to the center.
* The nuclear fusion in the center of the sun is not following the law of physics; because nuclear-fusion can produce heat once but can not survive in that heat. Nuclear-fusion in the sun’s core would have such impact that it would show many things; such as, expansion or contraction of the sun’s body for short periods of time. It should show these effects on the surface, but it does not.
* Scientists have recorded a sonogram of the Sun, and the energy that it is generating, is actually considered to be a quiet, calm star.
The only conclusion and practical theory would be that the Universe is a complete well-organized universe in which its suns are following quantum accretion of photons that is created by S-H utilizing quantum principles.
My speculation is that from the center of the sun, about 45% of its radius is occupied by photons, no mass. The remainder would be about 35% hydrogen and the rest of the 20% would be all helium and heavy elements on surface.
This is the actual structure of the Sun. If there are any other elements, besides hydrogen and helium, they are not part of the sun. They are polluting the sun and the sun wants to be liberated from them.
Suns are situated somehow that all the planets around a sun want to protect it; therefore, it is rare for an intruder such as a comet or asteroid to reach the sun. However, it is not completely unheard of either for a comet to get to the sun. As much as the planets around the Sun are protecting the Sun, the Sun as well, is protecting them by a variety of wave frequencies and wavelengths of sunlight.
For example: The gamma-ray or X-ray is a tool of the sun to destroy big comets from far away in space, because most of the comets have ingredients of water or light chemical elements inside, destroyed by gamma-rays. The same gamma-ray can travel to the farthest planet to support life as visible light.
The north and south poles above the sun’s surface have higher temperatures than the middle surface of the sun. Any comet is rejected and dissolved by the corona’s high heat and the gamma rays disrupting the atoms and molecules in space before contact with the sun. This is the way that an intelligent sun is protecting itself, so to speak. This is the best scenario, but sometimes they reach the sun anyway; for example, our sun has some residue of these comets over its surface. However, our Sun has less than 2% of infectious elements.
But it is very interesting that, if any S-H or cluster of S-H is within the territory of a sun, it would tend to go towards the hotter sun or to the bigger sun’s direction without any interference because eventually it would merge with the sun through accretion and make the sun hotter and bigger. How these S-H is going inside of the sun, my speculation is from the coronal area, where the single photon is generated.
The indication of planets going around a sun, or moons around planets is the hard evidence that the Universe is well organization with accurate structure to place everything in an orderly fashion to its will. Simply the Universe is an intelligent entity with an evolutionary journey, not an accidental explosion.
What is a Sun’s obligation?
The sun’s compulsion is to provide life for all the planets in its orbit, it does not matter how far they are from the sun. The planets are never formed until the host sun can provide and guarantee the life support for them.
The nature of a solar system is this: as the sun is getting bigger, more heat generates, and at the same time mysteriously more planets start to form and go around the sun. This is the nature of growing.
There are many factors that exist, but one of my strongest hypotheses is that the friction of a galaxy’s rotation with space would create two electromagnetic fields in which the two positive and negative fields would pull each other constantly. Furthermore, the original shape of all the galaxies is flat when they are formed in the Universe. (Further details are in my book).
Although all the complete and organized solar systems are flat and all the planets are going around a sun in this flat plane, my instinct is telling me, the reason that all the planets form on one plane around a sun is very simple, to stay alive. All the suns have a short window region located at the equator area; this is the only area where all the sun’s energy, complete photons and high frequency and short wavelengths are emitting out from the sun, which supports and sustains all life in the region.
The Suns’ Equatorial Window of Photons
As we know the photon is a bifurcation of two different categories. First, it is traveling by waves and second, it is traveling by a unity-photon to escort the sun’s wave.
The temperature on the surface of our Suns’ corona is millions of degrees different from the equator. Only the photon itself can get over a million visible degrees of temperature. But only the wave-photon can come out of the sun’s equatorial window; therefore, all the planets place themselves within this trajectory window.
When planets get this heat, they distribute it to the center of their body. This is the nature of the survival of planets. If the heat is more than enough, the planets store the excess energy inside the core for other usage, such as creating other elements or for future needs.
For example: if a planet is a gaseous planet, it is using the heat to create heavier elements in the core. Like Saturn, Jupiter or any gaseous cluster, at first, the light elements are pushed to the surface, and ultimately, they become a regular planet like Earth. For a better understanding of a comet read my book, The Quantum Mechanics Universe, in the corresponding chapter on H2O.
Why nature made the sun to function this way is proving the perfectionism of the Universe to bring this detail to our mind. Of course, it is hard to believe, but this is the best scientific explanation for all the solar systems in the Universe. Albert Einstein thought the flatness of our solar system is because of the Sun’s mass; therefore, he proposed his space-time platform, but the reality is, solar systems are formed on the equatorial line of their galaxies sun. This is very important to remember; each galaxy has a line that separates north from south. For the same reason every so many thousand/millions(?) of years, our earth changes its Polarity, due to the galaxies somersault movement within the Universe. (Details in my book).
How the Planets go around a Sun
When a sun starts to become a sun, the nature of atoms and molecules want to be close to the heat to stay alive. As the sun gets bigger, the heat is increased, and the dust ring of matter increases and starts to move around the sun keeping some distance. This cloud of dust would collapse and form a ring surrounding the young sun and eventually by weak and long gravity in the atoms it will collect dust in the pathway, and make a little planet, while the microgravity will sort all the matter and become a natural planet that goes around the sun. As the sun is getting bigger and creating more heat, the accretion of micro gravity and the accretion of spin make the rotation of the planets coordinate with the rotation of the Universe…and naturally planets are born. Again, as the sun is getting bigger, other planets form.
This is the very basics of forming a solar system that eventually create a larger solar system, which is following the natural law of quantum physics and accretion. There are thousands or millions of combinations accrued during the intercourse of the billions of years needed to form a solar system, but the basic ingredient is the accretion of panpsychist quantum elements.
The best example in our solar system, would be that the planet of Mercury was created first, and as the Sun got larger and hotter the planet of Venus formed second, and then the Earth…etc.
At one time the planet of Mercury may have had living species, like our Earth; but as the sun grew bigger, all the light elements such as water and the ingredients for life’s chemistry evaporated to Venus. And as the Sun grew bigger and hotter, the same scenario might have happened to Venus, and created the life on Earth. You never know, if the sun grows even hotter or bigger in the next few billion years, it might transfer all the light elements from Earth such as water, oxygen, and life organism to Mars.
This testimonial, that as the sun is getting bigger and hotter it makes the next planet develop living conditions, makes common sense. Additionally, it is making my theory that the suns have reverse gravity even stronger.
This is the standard of creation of a solar system. As the sun is getting larger and hotter, the electromagnetic force is getting stronger, and as a result the numbers of the planets are increased. The Sun has a little electromagnet force. Because of it the outer side has friction with the space wave.
It seems all the Big Bang fans believe that all the suns in the Universe are not more than 14 billion years old; but some of the suns are a million times bigger than our Sun and therefore, by the law of accretion, the Universe must be much older than we think.
How can Heat travel a long distance?
The sun is creating a variety of sun beams with low to high frequency and from long to short wavelengths. Each frequency belongs to certain planets or is traveling for a certain distance. For example: Gamma-ray can travel a longer distance than the X-ray. I believe they are quantum, non-electromagnetic waves, but this is beside my point, and I believe that in the future we will find the real quantum wave property inside of atoms.
NOTE: If quantum physics thinks that the electron with an electromagnetic field is creating photons, then all the rays must have electromagnetism and it would bring the speed of the photon to a halt by its polarity’s force.
The sun makes a variety of rays. Some are visible (very small proportions) that we are experimenting with on our Earth, but the majority of them cannot be seen by the naked eye such as ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays (extremely energetic with radiation); but they are all carrying light in different forms. These rays have high frequency and a very short wavelength, but still they are traveling at the speed of light with the body of wave while holding temperature inside.
Generally, sunlight is slowed down when it is coming into the Earth’s atmosphere, or into water; therefore, it is also slowed down in the very cold of space and when it is traveling for long distances (billions of km or miles). It is the nature of the sun’s beam to lose its energy or convert into another variation of energy.
NOTE: If any of us were exposed to just one second of high frequency and short wavelengths (gamma-rays), we would not notice it for a minute, but then we would feel as though it was burning through our skin to our bones.
Thus, the ultraviolet light becomes visible for some planets, and the X-ray gives life to the long-distance planets, and ultimately the Gamma-rays would support life for even more remote planets. This means that some of the planets that are the farthest away from the Sun get the same benefit from the sunlight that the closer planets are getting. This principle would apply to even farther away planets such as the blue planet of Neptune and Pluto.
FYI: Life is created by the right size of an atom, and sometimes the distance from a sun is not the subject, but the size of an atom matters.
Conclusion: The principle of each sun in a solar system is based on the equilibrium between producing energy and conserving energy. Suns create a product that has no-volume, no-mass, and no-shadow, but have visible/invisible properties called Photons. Photons are the creation of S-H. At first this photon has a little energy that shows itself by a golden color. This photon mysteriously merges with other photons and they condense themselves to a very high frequency and very short wavelengths and inexplicably come out of the sun in an invisible form, while some unify and show themselves with high temperature and are visible. The Sun’s duty is to use these two kinds of photons to deliver them in the right manner to support all the atoms in all its planets and moons.
On the other hand, all the planets are receiving this energy. They conserve it by absorbing it through their surface and sending the heat to the center of the planet or moon.
The equilibrium of this production and conservation of energy is the principle of each solar system, whole galaxies, and ultimately the whole universe. Simply, nothing is wasted in a quantum intelligent universe.
Sofia Williams added a reply:
The solar system is defined as a system of the Sun and the celestial bodies under its gravitational influence. These include the eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets and cosmic dust and gas. As the primary star, the Sun accounts for 99.86 per cent of the total mass and exerts a gravitational influence that binds the surrounding celestial bodies in orbit.
The fundamental principle underlying the operation of the solar system is the law of gravity. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths that adhere to the principles set forth by Kepler. The planets exhibit disparate periods of rotation and revolution, which are shaped by a range of factors, including their own mass and their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, the material within the solar system is maintained in dynamic equilibrium by the combined forces of gravity, kinetic energy and orbital mechanics.
Furthermore, the solar system is subject to external influences, including the interstellar medium and the gravitational influence of other galaxies. In summary, the solar system is a sophisticated and dynamic astronomical system that exemplifies the fundamental laws of celestial motion and gravitational interaction.
Arne Andersen added a reply:
Your post seems to lack a basic understanding of modern physics? To take the very simplest: Hydrogen atoms can fuse together to form helium. It is what keeps the sun warm. The helium atom is lighter than the hydrogen atoms that formed it. The difference in weight has become energy, in accordance with the well-known formula E=MC2. A colossal pressure is required to push hydrogen into helium. Such a pressure exists quite naturally in a star due to gravity. On Earth, we have achieved the same thing inside an atomic bomb, which acts as a primer for a hydrogen bomb. Where much of the explosive power comes from atoms being pressed together. (Unlike the atomic bomb, atoms are shot into pieces. The pieces are lighter than the starting atom, the rest becomes heat energy) There are constant attempts to force hydrogen together in a "peaceful way", the difficulty is to create the same pressure and temperature as in the interior of the sun.
What is the solar system like? And how does it work?
The building blocks of the Universe is a Panpsychist Quantum phenomenon. This unprecedented statement places us to where Quantum Mechanics become obsolete. To claim this spectacle of a statement, it would change our perception of an unintelligent mechanical universe to an evolutionary universe with a journey. This point of view would apply to every single element of our universe and suns cannot be an exception.
The knowledge that we have of our sun and its ingredients is all physical. We know our Sun has over 98% Hydrogen and Helium, but the Hydrogen and Helium that we know here on Earth cannot produce heat of millions of degrees, continuously, for billions of years. The reality is, the hydrogen that we know, cannot survive for a moment in such heat. Another question is the gravity of the sun. If the Sun has massive gravity, then why can it not hold the whole of its body at the same rate of velocity, because each section of its body rotates at many different speeds. Or, if it is the heaviest planet, then why is it made of the lightest elements known of the periodic table? The formation of a sun is another mystery and the rotation of planets in a plane is another big question mark. But by using the Panpsychist Quantum principles all these questions can be answered.
Key words: Sun-hydrogen, Sun formation, sun’s gravity, sun’s energy, planet rotation, sun rotation, quantum photon energy.
THE SUN
If we ask a toddler to draw a sun, he or she will draw a circle with some lines sticking out around the circle. The lines are representing the sunlight that is coming out of the sun and nothing is going in. This is the exact character of any sun; energy is coming out of the sun and nothing goes into the sun.
We ought to accept the fact that the Universe has been designed to create and survive the old-fashioned way, in a sense, we are duplicating the Universe. We are both made of the same chemical elements and each chemical element must have the same structure to follow, and that without temperature does not exist. Therefore, it brings us to the concept of creating life and supporting life.
To investigate the foundation of life (all species and vegetation), we would end up that life consists of a few atoms and molecules, and these atoms and molecules wouldn’t exist without temperature. The deeper explanation of life is the visibility of all mass conservation of energy. Simply nothing exists without temperature. The ‘life’ is started with a composite of the smallest complete entity unit of the universe, it is pronounced ATOM.
The chart of all the elements of the periodic table is hard evidence that each atom is presenting the exact character of that specific atom. Each atom is carrying its own mass, number of electron(s), size, color, taste, odor, the boiling/freeze point, chemical reaction, performing certain characteristic behavior, and each is holding specific information, and each has an evolutionary journey to create heavier atoms or molecules and ultimately life. Therefore, to achieve their consistency, they need environmental stability with some sort of support, nothing but right energy or temperature. Each atom conserves energy through nature where friction is no subject in an atom’s body. Simply, an atom does not work mechanically. This unprecedented statement discards Quantum Mechanics (QM) fundamentally.
As we know the strongest, smallest ancestor of every chemical element is the hydrogen atom, where each hydrogen atom is the composite of many unknown numbers of panpsychist quantum particles. Fortunately, we are aware of many types of isotope hydrogen. Yet the hydrogen that we know on earth has a natural journey to make heavier elements (PT). This hydrogen can not be in two places at the same time; therefore, it has the complementary partner to support its expedition. This duality exists in everything in the Universe.
SUN-HYDROGEN
Or
S-H
When and how is a Sun created?
We are going to determined how a sun appears in the Universe and how it is holding itself to survive for hundreds of billions of years with the harmony of the universe quantum nature concept. Suns are the only source of energy in a galaxy, in a sense, it is supporting life in the galaxy.
Sunlight or photons, the product of a sun, is mass-less and travel on a straight line; not forever, because, the nature of the space of the Universe is cold and absorbs energy as it is traveling. Therefore, the high frequency and short wavelength of the sunlight as it’s traveling, loses its energy in the course of billions of miles. The frequency and wavelength of sunlight is designed to support all its planets in its system; thus, finally it is exhausted on the rim of the galaxy. For the same reason the planets in the system are visible, and for the same reason each galaxy in the space of the universe is observed separately.
Suns are smart by nature. As the planets are circling a sun, the sun provides them energy. Sunlight’s duty is to carry and transfer photons (energy) from a sun to each of its planets by different wave lengths. Since it is mass-less it is not affected by anything, not even by the *gravity that most scientists think of; it is, however, affected by going through the long journey of cold space. The Sun is giving visibility and energy to all its surrounding planets, and for the same reason we are able to see and observe the most remote planets.
*See my Gravity is a Myth article or Gravity Is Internal.
But deep inside any sun there are tremendous functions at play that connect all the elements of the atoms in the Universe together, which is way beyond our imagination, because suns are creators of something that we never thought of before.
How much do we know scientifically about a sun? Or are the things that we think we know about the Sun true?
Well, there are some facts that no one can deny, such as: The Sun’s diameter is about 109 times bigger than the Earth and the rotation of the Sun is different from the Earth because it consists of more than 98% of the lightest known elements such as hydrogen and helium. It is like a large hot air balloon of light gas without the balloon itself. The surface of the Sun does not have a boundary; therefore, each part of the Sun has a different speed of rotation, due to its ingredient of a large fragile cloud of a light element.
For instance: the spot on the equator (the large circle) of the Sun, takes 24.47 Earth days to rotate once around or come to the same position; but as you go north or south from the equator, the rotation goes slower. The Sun’s South and North Poles take 38 days to rotate one cycle. These two speeds of rotation are telling us that the Sun does not have a solid body like the Earth, instead it is a hollow sphere with very light gas inside. So, the Sun’s skin is like a flaming ocean that at the equator runs faster than any other area of the Sun. These two speeds have been observed and measured, by an optical telescope, as sunspots that are moving across the Sun’s surface.
The Sun’s temperature varies in different sections; it can reach 6000 to 20,000 degrees centigrade on the surface depending on the region. The temperature of the outer surface of the Sun (corona) is about 1,000,000-2,000,000K, and some parts even go up to about 8,000,000K. This is all fact.
But, when it comes to when the Sun was created, how the Sun was born, what is inside the Sun, or how the sun is generating its energy with golden sunlight, then everything becomes speculation because no one knows for sure, when, how or what is going on inside a Sun.
Let me bring up a few examples and then you will realize how complicated the Sun is for scientists.
The most common one is that we assume that our Sun formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago and that it has not changed dramatically in its existence. Scientists also think that our Sun is now about middle-aged and has another 5 billion years to go.
Since 1904 until now, there are so many variations of theories that exist, that when you want to know about the Sun, you get confused; because each scientist has his/her own theory and when you compare them to each other, each one contradicts the other.
One of the main theories would be that a nuclear fusion reaction in the Sun’s core creates the powerful energy of the Sun. Most scientists believe that most of the Sun’s life energy is produced by this nuclear fusion in the core region. This theory is supported by a group of top scientists around the world, including Albert Einstein. Mr. Einstein has related that the source of the Sun’s energy output to be equivalent to his mass-energy formula of E=mc2. How this nuclear fusion is taking place though is a mystery and no one can explain it.
They believe that the core is the only region in the Sun that produces a substantial amount of thermal energy through nuclear fusion. 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by the time it reaches 30% of the radius, the fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers. Finally, it is transferred to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space as sunlight or the kinetic energy of particles. The core has a density of about 150 times the density of water and temperatures can reach close to 15.7 million degrees Kelvin. By contrast, the sun’s surface temperature is about 5800K at the equator.
This is one of the major theories that have existed for more than one hundred years and most cosmologists believe it strongly. Also, by recent studies, they believe that the Sun is composed of two of the lightest chemical elements of the periodic table. Hydrogen is holding 74.9% and helium accounts for 23.8% of the mass of the Sun. The remaining elements, which consist of less than 2%, are Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively.
Furthermore, the nuclear fusion in the Sun's core has modified the composition by converting hydrogen into helium, so the Sun’s innermost portion is now roughly 60% helium, with the abundance of heavier elements unchanged. The Sun’s death will occur after the hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped. Then the sun will collapse into itself.
All this that has been mentioned about the nuclear fusion inside the Sun and the life expectancy is just speculation and not definitive; but scientists strongly believe all the above because there is no other strong theory that exists. One thing is certain however, the content of the Sun is hydrogen and helium. All this information is just about our Sun that has been collected in the last few decades.
Unfortunately, there is so much information out there about our Sun, which in many ways contradicts each other, and many of which do not follow the laws of physics that we know, and they all have theoretical problems.
Theoretical Problems
The biggest problem of all is that the hydrogen element that we know here on Earth cannot survive at such high temperatures. It would rip apart in a fraction of a second at such temperatures. The question arises, how could a hydrogen atom in a sun create this tremendous energy (high temperature of millions of degrees) for billions of years? It does not fit into the physics that we know.
For producing photons, the electromagnetic force in the atom must generate these photons, but the inside of the Sun does not show any evidence of a large electromagnetic force. This is another reason why the electromagnetic force in the atoms has stayed put as a theory for more than half a century.
Also, the scientists think that the Sun is over 99% of the entire mass of the solar system because they believe our Sun is made of heavy-elements. But the Sun has more than 98% of two of the lightest elements in the periodic table, hydrogen and helium. So, what are these considered heavy-elements? No one has any clue.
Scientists think that the Sun’s energy is creating a lot of mass, because of Albert Einstein’s theory of E=mc², in which the energy of photons is producing mass, (a photon has no mass), while the mass itself is a mystery in our Universe. The scientists don’t know how matter got in the Universe, or how the Universe is gaining and producing a mass. But most important of all, is that they don’t know how the photon is created by the hydrogen atom continuously for billions of years, and how the hydrogen atom is surviving at that temperature of millions of degrees. Another theoretical problem is with the energy that the Sun has been producing for more than 4 billion years continuously through nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun. This does not make any scientific sense, because nuclear fusion that we know creates tremendous heat, with ultraviolet rays not photons, and the energy is accrued one time not continuously, but there is no such color or indication of action of nuclear fusion in the sun. Also, if a sun has tremendous gravity, then why does it have different speeds in different sections of its body? Or why are comets and asteroids rejected by the sun through its flaming?
As you can see, the Sun is a very complicated star that we really don’t know much about, because everything that the scientists are thinking reveals that one side of the equation does not match with other side of the equation.
How the Sun was formed
(According to today’s scientists)
At first, I would recommend you go to social media and search for “how the Sun was formed” then you will get more familiar with our Sun. Not to mention that most of the theories are about ourSun, not any other suns, because the scientists didn’t go that far.
Here is a concise belief and general idea of how our Sun was created from the scientist’s point of view.
The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a large gravitational collapsing cloud of gas inside an interstellar cloud. This cloud was pulled by a supernova for several million years before the collapse, and then it became a rotating disk with a large central knot where most of the mass is concentrated in the center. With high gravity and pressure in the region it flattened out into a disk and eventually it created planets and our Solar system’s body was shaped. And later, all the planets were formed.
The central knot continued to collapse under its own strong gravity force; it caused the interior of the Sun’s temperatures to soar, more than several million degrees. The hydrogen became deuterium atoms and started to fuse through nuclear force and created thermonuclear energy and it became the Sun that we know.
The scientists believe the Sun is about halfway through its life’s expectancy. By nuclear fusion reactions in its core, it fuses hydrogen into helium. The Sun is gradually becoming hotter during this time of its main development, because the helium atoms in the core occupy less volume than the hydrogen atoms that were fused. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, and make a stronger gravitational force.
Today’s scientists observed and believe that our sun has 74.9% hydrogen, and 23.8% helium, and has 700 million times more mass than all other planets added together in our solar system. Also, Einstein whispered that the Sun’s mass puts more dent in the space-time curvature.
As you can realize, everything that you have read above is all mechanics with no explanation of any source. It’s all speculation, with no sign of evolved nature. It is unrealistic for scientists of physics to describe the forming of our Sun differently from the other suns.
NOTE: Accretion’s law of quantum physics does not support creation of the universe as an accidental event by the four dumb forces of the Big Bang theory. When the BB theorists pronounced it, it was for a one galaxy universe, not for billons of galaxies of the universe we know today. Thus, the theory of the formation of the sun is limited to our Sun only.
How the Sun was formed
(My version from a panpsychist quantum perspective)
Everything in the Universe is following the nature of panpsychist quantum law, because the Universe is made of the fundamental building blocks of panpsychist elementary particles. This is the law of physics that we know. There are no flaws, no exceptions, no mistakes, and no improper functions in the law of quantum physics. If there is something that is a mystery to us, it is just because we don’t know the proper version of the source of the quantum particle of it; otherwise it is not hard to understand. The suns with their massive bodies are created from the same principle of quantum accretion that created the whole Universe, and therefore they cannot be an exception when the whole Universe started from Panpsychist Quantum Constituent Elementary Particles (PQCEP).
My perception of the creation of a sun is not just limited to our sun, or our solar system, it is applied to all several hundred billion galaxies’ of suns, where each galaxy is hosting several billions of suns or solar systems. Each sun must pass through a precise routine to become a complete sun. Suns at their very first moment are formed from one atom and, based on the accumulation of the suns’ hydrogen, they become hotter and larger.
It is like us, at the first moment in our mother’s womb, one DNA multiplied itself repeatedly to create us. And for the sun’s version, it gathers its atoms one by one to create a sun.
In the future we will learn that each solar system is forming very much the same way and even the galaxies are formed in a similar outline, because the elements of each galaxy are the same and they are all inside the Universe. Imagine the Universe as a tree and all the galaxies are its fruit, and all the fruit grow the same way, yet none of the fruit are the same.
The personality and character of any sun is described as follows: All suns are collectors and are attracted to a particular hydrogen of its own kind of atom that is special for that specific sun only. Suns are the lightest component in the Universe, because they are made of the lightest elements. They are the creators of unprecedented spacewaves and temperature. They are made of their own hydrogen and they create their own helium. Their hydrogen creates photons and the photons are accumulated inside the sun’s body to create their high temperature with high frequency and short wavelengths to become denser energy “gamma rays”. Suns are in the center of numerous planets which are going around them to protect the sun (the queen) from any intruders. They are situated in such a manner to support and protect all the life in their region. They have a negative gravity force, or reverse gravity, which does not allow any intruder to come into their territory because of this negative gravity personality.
As you can see, everything I’ve mentioned for a sun’s personality is different from what you’ve heard before. In two or more occasions they are exactly opposite of all that the scientist’s axiom implies. First, that all suns are the lightest mass component in the Universe, and second, that the sun is carrying a negative gravity. These unprecedented statements are the precise opposite of what the scientists taught us, and it even contradicts Albert Einstein’s theories as well. Additionally, suns are the creators of all the waves in the space of the Universe, not to mention that the S-H is different from our hydrogen here on Earth as is generally thought.
Don’t forget that all the planets in the Universe are weightless anyway, because of the Universe’s rotation, but they are still carrying their own mass and the mass of a sun is actually less than any planet.
The reason I mention the sun is the lightest mass is because it is made of a special hydrogen atom; also, we know a hydrogen atom has the lightest mass of any atom that mankind knows. It will scientifically be proven one day that the sun is made in such a way that it matches with all the laws of quantum physics, based on accretion of PQCEP as well as synchronicity of duality.
Let me briefly explain each of the Sun’s characters that I mentioned above.
Collector of the Special Hydrogen Atom
The structure of our hydrogen atom has brought a lot of tension and conflict among scientists because the normal hydrogen that we know cannot survive in the high temperature environment of a sun; therefore, there is uncertainty of what causes the sun to generate such high temperatures of energy for so long a period of time (billions of years). Yet we know the majority of the Sun’s volume is occupied by hydrogen.
The suns hydrogen atom is therefore different from the Earth’s hydrogen atom, because our Earth’s hydrogen atom cannot produce light with high temperature, nor can it survive in a sun’s high temperature. It breaks apart in a fraction of a moment in the million degrees of the temperature of a sun. Therefore, the Sun’s hydrogen must have a stronger gravity quark force inside the hadron to hold its electron, because if an atom loses its electron(s), it would not be an atom anymore, and the electron wouldn’t be an electron any longer. Not to mention that based on duality and the nature of the Universe, there must be a hydrogen atom to complement and support the hydrogen atom that is creating life.
The sun-hydrogen (S-H) atom has one electron and one major duty to perform, which is just producing photons to protect the life-hydrogen (L-H) that we know. This is the law of synchronicity of duality. The S-H is attracted to each other based on their *long gravity. At first the long gravity collects them and puts them together to make a cluster of a cloud of S-H. Since this cluster of S-H is in the “space” of the Universe it becomes a spherical shape and a sun is born. All the chemical elements in gas or liquid form, create a spherical shape anywhere in the space of the universe, due to the rotation of a spherical hollow universe and characteristics of space that make wave through temperature, i.e. raindrops, bubbles or atoms.
If we place some gas elements is a square glass container, we will see, the gas forms a spherical shape.
*Long Gravity in an atom is connecting or holding similar atoms like O2 of our atmosphere.
As the little sun is growing, the speed of collecting the S-H in the region gets faster and the layer of the spherical shape of the S-H inside the sun gets thicker and the temperature rises.
This process is following the law of accretion of S-H atoms, and all suns must follow this procedure to become a sun. This process takes a long time to become a larger sun. The S-H can produce sunlight for tens of billions of years, because the content of the hadron’s duty is to just produce heat to support life for all the planets in the galaxy
Suns are the Lightest element in the Universe
At the very first moment of creation, a special S-H atom started to create light. The S-H is very similar to our hydrogen here on Earth that we know, because it has just one electron; but inside the hadron, the elementary particle of strong gravity is performing with electrons in different forms to create photons. Since it has just one electron, it is considered as the lightest complete unit of the Universe. The S-H has a different characteristic behavior from the Earth’s hydrogen in quantum physics, therefore it is the lightest unit in the Universe.
The difference between L-H and S-H is the performance of one or more quarks of the elementary particles in the hadron; otherwise it has the same mass. In chemistry there are many atoms that have the same mass, but different characters in the hadron. It is called an Isotope.
This S-H seems that it has only one offspring which is carrying strong gravity force as well and can survive in the sun, it is called sun-helium (S-He). There is no indication of heavier elements other than the S-He atoms in the sun. The characteristic of both S-H and S-He also are different. S-H’s duty is to only make photons continuously. While the S-He’s duty is to protect the stability of the S-H by its positioning over the S-H in a sun, and additionally it is filtering and inspecting the sunlight for quality perfection before radiating out of the sun which in different sections of the sun releases different frequencies and wavelengths.
To demonstrate accretion of massless photons, using a magnify glass to unify or compact sunlight is a good example.
Creator of Space Wave
The source of the wave in the Universe is unknown by today’s science. In addition, we think the impact of the Big Bang created a wave that can travel at the speed of light to expand the space. In general, the “wave” in the Big Bang theory has never been mentioned before as a primary element that has a direct relationship to the life of an atom in the Universe.
The notion of any mechanical wave should be that it will fade or disappear after 14 billion years of traveling and expanding in the Universe’s space in an infinite platform. Even still, we are observing that there is no indication of a spreading or traveling wave in all directions in space.
Meanwhile, we are continuously witnessing that a variety of waves exist in the space of the Universe that makes us think that the wave is still being produced in the space of the Quantum Universe.
When we reconcile these two paragraphs above, it makes it clear that wave and temperature exist in a galaxy together and they are corresponding to each other. Fundamentally, there is no spot in the galaxy without wave, even in an atom, because an atom occupies the space of a galaxy.
In the earlier 1900’s, some physicists had become reconciled with wave-particle duality and proposed that particles such as an electron or nuclei would have wavelike properties; but unfortunately, all these exhibits have been forgotten for more than half a century. The quantum wave length should be studied further, because these waves in the atom do exist. I am very optimistic that in the near future science will reveal many unknown concepts in the quantum field; but in particular the discovery of the communication tools of the wave inside an atom will be one of the most unprecedented remarks that my theory has presented.
Furthermore, we really don’t know much about the source of this phenomenon of the wave in space, but it is the source of all the communication between everything in the Universe. For example, all our senses are transmitted with wave inside our body, and all the atoms in our body survive with wave through pressure and temperature. Therefore, this natural remark of wave must be involved with everything and even the creation of all spherical shapes in the Universe including the atom.
The existing wave in the hadron must be one of the first primary functions in the hadron after the creation of space. My belief is that all atoms are carrying a wavelike property in the hadron for a communication tool between the center and the electron(s). Our bodies, which collectively are created by atoms and molecules, and that are the source of our existence, are controlled by wave.
There is no doubt that the sun is creating a variety of high frequency waves with short wavelength for the photons to travel at high speeds for long distances to deliver life support for far away planets (like from our Sun to the planet Neptune) that the actual heat of the Sun cannot reach directly as it does for our Earth.
Scientists think that the sunlight can travel at the same speed of light to infinite. But the sunlight would be exhausted eventually, because nothing can travel to infinite. Even the gamma ray, as it is traveling, would lose its energy through the cold space in the long run and will convert to sunlight (visible light) in the far distance in the galaxy. This phenomenon, that sunlight will be exhausted after a long distance of travel, is unprecedented and has never been mentioned and tested, though scientists detected gamma-rays billions of miles away from the sun, but logically it makes scientific sense that, as heat is traveling through cold space, it loses temperature.
Photons are energy in the form of temperature and any energy that travels with the wave releases its energy through friction with the very cold space between the planets. The reality is that as soon as the high frequency and short wavelength reaches out from the direct region of a sun, it would start to lose its original frequency and wavelength.
The science of physics has proven that any wave will lose its oscillation after a while of traveling. Think of a radio wave that would fade as it is traveling. This is the law of physics that any wave with friction will lose speed, and any heat wave will lose temperature as it travels. Any speed with wave will exhaust itself ultimately. It would be a disaster if the sunlight could travel to infinite, because then there would not be that many galaxies in the Universe. The whole Universe would be one huge unorganized, one-galaxy,Universe. Furthermore, to extend this thought, if the sunlight could travel to infinite, the Universe would not have an inside or an outside.
To put the sun’s energy in laymen’s terms, a cooler box is a good example. After a certain period of time, a heated object loses temperature and ice will gain temperature, or both of them will adapt to the environments’ temperature. Think of the ice as the space of the Universe and the photon as a hot object.
Negative Gravity
It is a shocking statement for the world of cosmology to say that the suns have a negative gravity, while all the scientists are saying that the sun’s strong gravity is holding all the planets around it. But, in reality, the only way for the sun to stay alive for billions of years, is that it must have negative gravity to survive.
When it mentions gravity, it means the unification in the atoms which sorts the elements in the formation of the planets or suns; because we have already rejected Newtonian and Einsteinian laws of gravity. Read my book for detail.
So, the gravity of the Sun (or suns) is opposite the Earth’s sorting element gravity. It means the suns’ gravity would place all the lightest elements in the center of the sun as opposed to the heavier elements that center themselves in the earthlike planets.
If we cut our Sun into two halves, from the center to the crest of the skin, the order of progression would be: photons (no mass), S-H, S-He, and the remaining heavier elements which are less than 2% such as Carbon, Oxygen, Neon, and Iron respectively would be at the outer surface.
Therefore, anything heavier than the S-H or helium is rejected and expelled out of the region by the high temperatures of the sun. Sometimes we can even see with special filtered lenses the Sun-flares miles (Km’s) above the surface of the Sun because of this reason. The Sun’s nature is to get rid of elements such as carbon, oxygen, neon, and iron or any other heavier element out of its surface or its territory. Any element besides the S-H and S-He in a sun represents an impurity or an infection of the sun. The main reason is because any chemical element that we know would kill the sun’s function if it reached the center. Suns are very smart and sensitive regarding the impurity of our chemical elements. They know that if any heavy elements reach inside of them, it would kill them. This is the nature of a sun, anything that L-H is making, is poison for them.
Each photon, as S-H, is creating just has fractional part of the photon is not as complete as sun rays, and it does not have enough temperature to travel very far away nor does it have high frequency or wavelength to keep its high temperature; therefore, it takes a long time to be inclusive in the sun for the accretion’s process. The sun wants to make a comprehensive variation of sun beams that all the planets around it can get the equal benefit from. The high heat mysteriously is compacted in very high frequency and very short wavelengths that can skip through S-H at first, and then can pass through more compact atoms of the S-He and finally come out of the sun.
The strangest part of this event is the accretion of the photons. It is when most of the photons are packed by millions of degrees of temperature into a single form, where the heat becomes invisible into the very high frequency and very short wavelength that can pass through S-He. Yet some would not be able to do this task and are left behind, but they still hold very high temperature. The only reason this occurrence is happening is because of the synchronicity duality principles that even exist in the photons. The photons are divided into different forms.
One version can get the heat of millions of degrees of temperature in invisibleform into high frequency and short wavelengths that can carry heat for billions of miles (km) to the most remote planet in that solar system. The second version of the photons would get very high heat in visibleform in its mass-less form that we call photons. The idea of very high frequency and short wavelength is that the heat is sitting inside the wave, and this wave can carry its heat for a long journey.
The sunlight that we observe daily must go through thousands of procedures and thousands of years to be complete. Then with so much inspection and filtering, finally after it passes these qualifications then it can be released from the Sun.
These two (visible) photon and wave-photon (invisible), are synergistic and complement each other all the time. The most common one is when wave sunlight is coming out of the sun. First, the visible photon is escorting it until it loses its energy and then, secondly, the wave photon alone runs its energy for the long journey in the cold space of the Universe.
The Sun is the Creator of Wave-Temperature
The source of wave in space surely originates from the suns, because wave and temperature always are together and these two cannot be separated from each other. As we know the sun is creating temperature and therefore also creating wave. This topic has its own explanation in my book.
How the S-Hydrogen is situated in the Sun
The best metaphor to picture the inside of the sun is a coconut. The dark shell of the coconut is layers of S-He, the white part (meat) is S-H, and the hollow inside of the coconut is occupied by photons.
As the number of S-H is increased by accretion, the sun is growing, but when the heat rises to a certain point then the S-H needs more protection. The intelligent sun will start to make a special helium atom from two S-H to protect the sun’s heat and keep the S-H uniform inside the sun for three major reasons.
The most important one is that as the heat is going up, the heat makes the S-H unstable and it is hard for S-H to stay in the proper position while it is making photons. Here the nature of the sun’s growth creates helium atoms from two S-H atoms to stay over the sun’s surface to manage the S-H. The helium atom has two electrons and these two electrons are bonded together by a stronger gravity force; therefore, it is a more compacted atom than a hydrogen atom, furthermore, the space inside the helium is thicker where S-H cannot escape, due to the size of helium. Since the sun has reverse gravity, the helium atom with more mass, is staying above the S-H like a net around the S-H to hold them consistently. Earlier I mentioned suns are like a coconut. So, the sun’s skin (helium atoms) is getting thicker and stronger for more protection and to filter sunlight accurately for longer distances.
The second reason is that the helium is playing as a protector of S-H and it does not let anything interfere with the S-H’s duty. Therefore, the sun does not let any comets or foreign objects land on its surface, because the sun’s gravitation is calibrated through the surface’s flame and incinerates the intruder comets or others before they can reach the sun’s surface.
The third reason is that the sun will not allow any incomplete photons to go out of the sun, and that is controlled by certain layers of the helium through a filtering process for longer distance planets and moons.
The color of a sun is an indication of many things, the most important one is that the S-H has a high variation for different purposes. Another indication of the color of a sun is the age of the sun, or impurities, layers of S-H, S-He and many other unknown factors. However, no purple sun has been observed if nuclear fusion in a sun exists. As you are perceiving, suns are made of specific atoms that have never been mentioned anywhere before.
My observation of our Sun, for the size and energy that our Sun is producing, is that it is actually very calm; but scientists are saying that in the sun’s center, there is nuclear fusion that creates the sun’s heat, and which has enormous mass and gravity.
It is very easy to rejectthe theory that a nuclear fusion is happening in the center of the sun, and that the sun has a tremendous mass and gravity in the center. It is obvious that such hydrogen nuclear fusion cannot exist in such a high temperature environment for billions of years without any initiative, nor will it keep doing so for another four billion years or more without any source and motivation. There is no strong endorsement in the science of physics to back up such a nuclear fusion theory to power a sun such as:
* Nothing in the Universe is working mechanically, as Einstein is stating. The strong gravity theory of Einstein would attract heavy elements into the sun and kill the sun right away.
* A strong gravity does not make any scientific sense in a sun. Or mechanical gravity as it is described as a pulling force that applies at certain distances, and not by multi-distances for all the planets and moons in our solar system.
* A big mass in the center of a sun does not make any sense, when over 98% of the Sun is made of hydrogen and helium atoms.
* Big mass and strong gravity (conventional thinking) would not let the Sun’s equator move faster than its two poles; according to Einstein’s theory of gravity, each part of a planet is pulled by the same gravity source equally.
* The strong gravity would not let any heavier element, such as iron, stay on the top surface of the Sun moving freely. The strong gravity would pull heavier elements into the Sun’s center, i.e. heavier elements on the earth sink to the center.
* The nuclear fusion in the center of the sun is not following the law of physics; because nuclear-fusion can produce heat once but can not survive in that heat. Nuclear-fusion in the sun’s core would have such impact that it would show many things; such as, expansion or contraction of the sun’s body for short periods of time. It should show these effects on the surface, but it does not.
* Scientists have recorded a sonogram of the Sun, and the energy that it is generating, is actually considered to be a quiet, calm star.
The only conclusion and practical theory would be that the Universe is a complete well-organized universe in which its suns are following quantum accretion of photons that is created by S-H utilizing quantum principles.
My speculation is that from the center of the sun, about 45% of its radius is occupied by photons, no mass. The remainder would be about 35% hydrogen and the rest of the 20% would be all helium and heavy elements on surface.
This is the actual structure of the Sun. If there are any other elements, besides hydrogen and helium, they are not part of the sun. They are polluting the sun and the sun wants to be liberated from them.
Suns are situated somehow that all the planets around a sun want to protect it; therefore, it is rare for an intruder such as a comet or asteroid to reach the sun. However, it is not completely unheard of either for a comet to get to the sun. As much as the planets around the Sun are protecting the Sun, the Sun as well, is protecting them by a variety of wave frequencies and wavelengths of sunlight.
For example: The gamma-ray or X-ray is a tool of the sun to destroy big comets from far away in space, because most of the comets have ingredients of water or light chemical elements inside, destroyed by gamma-rays. The same gamma-ray can travel to the farthest planet to support life as visible light.
The north and south poles above the sun’s surface have higher temperatures than the middle surface of the sun. Any comet is rejected and dissolved by the corona’s high heat and the gamma rays disrupting the atoms and molecules in space before contact with the sun. This is the way that an intelligent sun is protecting itself, so to speak. This is the best scenario, but sometimes they reach the sun anyway; for example, our sun has some residue of these comets over its surface. However, our Sun has less than 2% of infectious elements.
But it is very interesting that, if any S-H or cluster of S-H is within the territory of a sun, it would tend to go towards the hotter sun or to the bigger sun’s direction without any interference because eventually it would merge with the sun through accretion and make the sun hotter and bigger. How these S-H is going inside of the sun, my speculation is from the coronal area, where the single photon is generated.
The indication of planets going around a sun, or moons around planets is the hard evidence that the Universe is well organization with accurate structure to place everything in an orderly fashion to its will. Simply the Universe is an intelligent entity with an evolutionary journey, not an accidental explosion.
What is a Sun’s obligation?
The sun’s compulsion is to provide life for all the planets in its orbit, it does not matter how far they are from the sun. The planets are never formed until the host sun can provide and guarantee the life support for them.
The nature of a solar system is this: as the sun is getting bigger, more heat generates, and at the same time mysteriously more planets start to form and go around the sun. This is the nature of growing.
There are many factors that exist, but one of my strongest hypotheses is that the friction of a galaxy’s rotation with space would create two electromagnetic fields in which the two positive and negative fields would pull each other constantly. Furthermore, the original shape of all the galaxies is flat when they are formed in the Universe. (Further details are in my book).
Although all the complete and organized solar systems are flat and all the planets are going around a sun in this flat plane, my instinct is telling me, the reason that all the planets form on one plane around a sun is very simple, to stay alive. All the suns have a short window region located at the equator area; this is the only area where all the sun’s energy, complete photons and high frequency and short wavelengths are emitting out from the sun, which supports and sustains all life in the region.
The Suns’ Equatorial Window of Photons
As we know the photon is a bifurcation of two different categories. First, it is traveling by waves and second, it is traveling by a unity-photon to escort the sun’s wave.
The temperature on the surface of our Suns’ corona is millions of degrees different from the equator. Only the photon itself can get over a million visible degrees of temperature. But only the wave-photon can come out of the sun’s equatorial window; therefore, all the planets place themselves within this trajectory window.
When planets get this heat, they distribute it to the center of their body. This is the nature of the survival of planets. If the heat is more than enough, the planets store the excess energy inside the core for other usage, such as creating other elements or for future needs.
For example: if a planet is a gaseous planet, it is using the heat to create heavier elements in the core. Like Saturn, Jupiter or any gaseous cluster, at first, the light elements are pushed to the surface, and ultimately, they become a regular planet like Earth. For a better understanding of a comet read my book, The Quantum Mechanics Universe, in the corresponding chapter on H2O.
Why nature made the sun to function this way is proving the perfectionism of the Universe to bring this detail to our mind. Of course, it is hard to believe, but this is the best scientific explanation for all the solar systems in the Universe. Albert Einstein thought the flatness of our solar system is because of the Sun’s mass; therefore, he proposed his space-time platform, but the reality is, solar systems are formed on the equatorial line of their galaxies sun. This is very important to remember; each galaxy has a line that separates north from south. For the same reason every so many thousand/millions(?) of years, our earth changes its Polarity, due to the galaxies somersault movement within the Universe. (Details in my book).
How the Planets go around a Sun
When a sun starts to become a sun, the nature of atoms and molecules want to be close to the heat to stay alive. As the sun gets bigger, the heat is increased, and the dust ring of matter increases and starts to move around the sun keeping some distance. This cloud of dust would collapse and form a ring surrounding the young sun and eventually by weak and long gravity in the atoms it will collect dust in the pathway, and make a little planet, while the microgravity will sort all the matter and become a natural planet that goes around the sun. As the sun is getting bigger and creating more heat, the accretion of micro gravity and the accretion of spin make the rotation of the planets coordinate with the rotation of the Universe…and naturally planets are born. Again, as the sun is getting bigger, other planets form.
This is the very basics of forming a solar system that eventually create a larger solar system, which is following the natural law of quantum physics and accretion. There are thousands or millions of combinations accrued during the intercourse of the billions of years needed to form a solar system, but the basic ingredient is the accretion of panpsychist quantum elements.
The best example in our solar system, would be that the planet of Mercury was created first, and as the Sun got larger and hotter the planet of Venus formed second, and then the Earth…etc.
At one time the planet of Mercury may have had living species, like our Earth; but as the sun grew bigger, all the light elements such as water and the ingredients for life’s chemistry evaporated to Venus. And as the Sun grew bigger and hotter, the same scenario might have happened to Venus, and created the life on Earth. You never know, if the sun grows even hotter or bigger in the next few billion years, it might transfer all the light elements from Earth such as water, oxygen, and life organism to Mars.
This testimonial, that as the sun is getting bigger and hotter it makes the next planet develop living conditions, makes common sense. Additionally, it is making my theory that the suns have reverse gravity even stronger.
This is the standard of creation of a solar system. As the sun is getting larger and hotter, the electromagnetic force is getting stronger, and as a result the numbers of the planets are increased. The Sun has a little electromagnet force. Because of it the outer side has friction with the space wave.
It seems all the Big Bang fans believe that all the suns in the Universe are not more than 14 billion years old; but some of the suns are a million times bigger than our Sun and therefore, by the law of accretion, the Universe must be much older than we think.
How can Heat travel a long distance?
The sun is creating a variety of sun beams with low to high frequency and from long to short wavelengths. Each frequency belongs to certain planets or is traveling for a certain distance. For example: Gamma-ray can travel a longer distance than the X-ray. I believe they are quantum, non-electromagnetic waves, but this is beside my point, and I believe that in the future we will find the real quantum wave property inside of atoms.
NOTE: If quantum physics thinks that the electron with an electromagnetic field is creating photons, then all the rays must have electromagnetism and it would bring the speed of the photon to a halt by its polarity’s force.
The sun makes a variety of rays. Some are visible (very small proportions) that we are experimenting with on our Earth, but the majority of them cannot be seen by the naked eye such as ultraviolet rays, X-rays, and Gamma rays (extremely energetic with radiation); but they are all carrying light in different forms. These rays have high frequency and a very short wavelength, but still they are traveling at the speed of light with the body of wave while holding temperature inside.
Generally, sunlight is slowed down when it is coming into the Earth’s atmosphere, or into water; therefore, it is also slowed down in the very cold of space and when it is traveling for long distances (billions of km or miles). It is the nature of the sun’s beam to lose its energy or convert into another variation of energy.
NOTE: If any of us were exposed to just one second of high frequency and short wavelengths (gamma-rays), we would not notice it for a minute, but then we would feel as though it was burning through our skin to our bones.
Thus, the ultraviolet light becomes visible for some planets, and the X-ray gives life to the long-distance planets, and ultimately the Gamma-rays would support life for even more remote planets. This means that some of the planets that are the farthest away from the Sun get the same benefit from the sunlight that the closer planets are getting. This principle would apply to even farther away planets such as the blue planet of Neptune and Pluto.
FYI: Life is created by the right size of an atom, and sometimes the distance from a sun is not the subject, but the size of an atom matters.
Conclusion: The principle of each sun in a solar system is based on the equilibrium between producing energy and conserving energy. Suns create a product that has no-volume, no-mass, and no-shadow, but have visible/invisible properties called Photons. Photons are the creation of S-H. At first this photon has a little energy that shows itself by a golden color. This photon mysteriously merges with other photons and they condense themselves to a very high frequency and very short wavelengths and inexplicably come out of the sun in an invisible form, while some unify and show themselves with high temperature and are visible. The Sun’s duty is to use these two kinds of photons to deliver them in the right manner to support all the atoms in all its planets and moons.
On the other hand, all the planets are receiving this energy. They conserve it by absorbing it through their surface and sending the heat to the center of the planet or moon.
The equilibrium of this production and conservation of energy is the principle of each solar system, whole galaxies, and ultimately the whole universe. Simply, nothing is wasted in a quantum intelligent universe.
Sofia Williams added a reply:
The solar system is defined as a system of the Sun and the celestial bodies under its gravitational influence. These include the eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets and cosmic dust and gas. As the primary star, the Sun accounts for 99.86 per cent of the total mass and exerts a gravitational influence that binds the surrounding celestial bodies in orbit.
The fundamental principle underlying the operation of the solar system is the law of gravity. The planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths that adhere to the principles set forth by Kepler. The planets exhibit disparate periods of rotation and revolution, which are shaped by a range of factors, including their own mass and their distance from the Sun. Furthermore, the material within the solar system is maintained in dynamic equilibrium by the combined forces of gravity, kinetic energy and orbital mechanics.
Furthermore, the solar system is subject to external influences, including the interstellar medium and the gravitational influence of other galaxies. In summary, the solar system is a sophisticated and dynamic astronomical system that exemplifies the fundamental laws of celestial motion and gravitational interaction.
Hi,
I found in ERA5 reanalysis dataset, the LAI points to 2 variables: Leaf area index, low vegetation and Leaf area index, high vegetation, I also found 2 variables named low vegetation cover and High vegetation cover (0~1). So anyone knows if I want to get a LAI value for the specific pixel, How could I do? Just calculate LAI according: LAI = LAI_hv*high_cover+LAI_lv*low_cover or other methods?
I'm little confused and want to confirm this.
Thanks a lot!
I am researching the traceability of palm oil and need a parameter that can differentiate between provinces around the world. I want to group the provinces by their vegetation zone and see if it's a good classification. Is there any how that I can that? If there's any, what is the name of the zone separation and is it available to provincial level? Thanks.
The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a widely used remote sensing metric, provides valuable insights into vegetation health and density. By calculating the ratio of near-infrared (NIR) to red reflectance, NDVI quantifies greenness and helps differentiate various habitats, including forests. However, while NDVI is effective for assessing vegetation status, it has limitations. These include sensitivity to atmospheric effects, saturation at high vegetation cover, and variations due to sensor characteristics. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate interpretation, especially in applications like Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), where users may lack remote sensing expertise. In summary, while NDVI offers valuable information, it should be used alongside other indices and contextual data to fully assess forest potential.
I'm wondering how one handles demographic data that are incomplete to estimate status and trend. For example, consider a 5-stage plant population with stages 1) Seed bank, 2) Seedlings 3) Juvenile 4) Vegetative adult 5) Reproductive adult. For several years one might have yearly counts on all of these, but suppose in recent years, only seed bank data were gathered, or only reproductive adult data were gathered, or both. How does one make use of the full set of incomplete data to estimate status and trend for such a population? I had a plant species in mind, but this is a general question that could pertain to any plant or animal species with incomplete yearly stage, size, or age demographic data.
After harmonizing and making all the radiometric corrections, I still get that Landsat 8 shows a wrong increase in vegetation intensity. Anybody with a similar problem that may have found a solution?
hello
i want to apply vegetation suppression using the forced invariance method on satellite images
as described in articles (a,b) to could get a better lithological mapping in strongly vegetated areas.
in these, the equation used as follow after plotting the NDVI vs band digital numbers:
Pnew = Poriginal × (Ptarget/PNDVI)
here, Pnew is the new pixel value, Poriginal is the original pixel value, Ptarget is the bandwise
target value and PNDVI is the corresponding NDVI value.
but i cant understand the Ptarget and how should i define that
in fact we have scatter plot showing the distribution of DN values for each band vs the calculated vegetation index e.g. NDVI like image below
a smooted curve is determined for that and used in equation to suppress the vegetation effect on pixel values
how should i define Ptarget in this equation
can anyone describe in more practical way how do i apply that
or how should i define Ptarget values for pixels
thanks previously
a: Crippen, R.; Blom, R. Unveiling the Lithology of Vegetated Terrains in Remotely Sensed Imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 67, 935–943.
b: Yu, L.; Porwal, A.; Holden, E.-J.; Dentith, M.C. Suppression of vegetation in multispectral remote sensing images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 7343–7357
Hello everyone!
I'm currently working on a time series of vegetation indices, and a key question I have is which method of atmospheric correction to use. Is it absolutely crucial for achieving accurate results, or is it something I can potentially skip? I would appreciate some insights on this matter.
Thank you!
I wonder if there is a clear consensus on the definition of “macrophyte”, as I found rather distinct definitions in the literature:
- Some sources (Bornette & Puijalon, 2009; Font-Quer, 1975; Schaumburg et al., 2004) claim it refers only to aquatic plants. For example, in Schaumburg et al. (2004) freshwater macroalgae are all encompassed under the name “Remaining phytobenthos”. The main problem I have with this definition is that there are several synonyms to refer to aquatic plants (aquatic plants, hydrophytes…) whereas there would not be a clear term for referring to all macroscopic aquatic vegetation, in spite of this term being of interest for referring to their shared ecosystem services or the fact they are all mostly studied by the same botanists.
- Others claim it refers to both aquatic plants and green macroalgae (Lacoul & Freedman, 2006; Padial et al. 2008). This is generally, under the justification that they belong to the same lineage. The main problem I have with this definition is that it is also done by emphasising their similar ecological roles, which are not exclusive of those organisms, and which are also aplicable to other macroalgae (red and brown).
- Others encompass freshwater plants and macroalgae (Chambers et al., 2008). The main problem I have with this definition is that it constrains the definition to freshwater or brackish ecosystems, whereas there is no clear reason to ignore the marine ecosystems, as there are organisms there with analogous ecosystem functions.
- Finally, other authors refer to all aquatic macroscopic vegetation, including macroalgae and plants as macrophytes(Hernandez et al., 2010; Lesiv et al. 2020; Ortega et al. 2020, Trevathan-Tackett et al. 2015). Lesiv et al. (2020) acknowledges that whilst plants and green algae are almost always considered as macrophytes, other macroalgae groups are considered as such too. I believe this is the most useful, as there are several names (both morphological and functional) to refer to aquatic plants (hydrophytes, marine/freshwater phanerogams … ) but there is no other word to refer to all these autotrophic macroscopic organisms that can be found in aquatic ecosystems (both freshwater and marine), which share several ecological traits.
There seems to be a tendency in authors that work on the marine environment to group all marine plants and macroalgae under the term “macrophyte”, whilst authors that work on freshwater environment tend to use a more restrictive definition, possibly as a result of the higher plant diversity and almost negligible xanthophyte and rhodophyte diversities. I’m more drawn to the all-inclusive definition, as it allows to refer to all macroscopic producers of all aquatic ecosystems in a simple and effective way, but I do wonder if there is a consensus on the use of this word or if other people have any comments on this regard.
Note: Please note that I considered the term “plant” as a way to refer only to members of the Plantae kingdom, disregarding the tendency of some authors to use the term to any kind of vegetation, as it can be misleading.
Bibiography
- Chambers, P. A., Lacoul, P., Murphy, K. J., & Thomaz, S. M. (2007). Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9154-6
- Bornette, G. & Puijalon, S. 2009. Macrophytes: Ecology of Aquatic Plants. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chich‐ester, UK.
- Hernandez, L., Bermejo, R., García-Marín, P., Brun, F.G., Vergara, J.J., 2010. MarineMacrophytes and the Water Framework Directive: Preliminary Studies in SouthernSpain. Ambientalia SPL.
- LACOUL, P. and FREEDMAN, B., 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environ.rev., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 89-136
- Lesiv, M. S., Polishchuk, A. I., & Antonyak, H. L. (2020). Aquatic macrophytes: ecological features and functions. Studia Biologica, 14(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1402.619
- Ortega, A., Geraldi, N. R., & Duarte, C. M. (2020). Environmental DNA identifies marine macrophyte contributions to Blue Carbon sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(12), 3139–3149. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11579
- Padial, A., Bini, L., & Thomaz, S. (2008). The study of aquatic macrophytes in Neotropics: a scientometrical view of the main trends and gaps. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 68(4 suppl), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842008000500012
- Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Foerster, J., Gutowski, A., Hofmann, G., Meilinger, P., Schneider, S., & Schmedtje, U. (2004). Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the water framework directive. Limnologica, 34(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0075-9511(04)80002-1
- Trevathan-Tackett, S. M., Kelleway, J., Macreadie, P. I., Beardall, J., Ralph, P., & Bellgrove, A. (2015). Comparison of marine macrophytes for their contributions to blue carbon sequestration. Ecology, 96(11), 3043–3057. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0149.1
I am looking for journals that might accept more descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys) and physical assessments with an emphasis on ecosystem restoration.
Hello,
I am a PhD student and I want to work on the effect of vegetation patch on river flow. I have written the proposal, but my supervisor believes that I should provide a practical justification for this study.
Most of the studies have tried to cover the research and scientific gaps and I have written the same reasons.
What do you think the vegetation in the middle of the river can be used for?
If you have any advice or article you can introduce, I will be very grateful.
I am trying to use MaxEnt for my thesis but for some reason I just can't find usable environmental data. The only data I have been able to use so far is bioclimatic data from Bioclim. I can't find anyone else asking this question. Many asks about converting the data or processing it but not obtaining it. To specify I'm searching for data of Europe regarding hydrology, vegetation cover and/or soil.
As a part of my PhD research, I need to conduct a submersible vegetation survey and collect samples to determine the biomass. Can anyone guide me in this regard? I know one method called RAKE sampling.
I have field data for random samples from a specific forest, represented by vegetal surveys, where each vegetal survey contains one, two or three dominant vegetal species with geographic coordinates. How can I create a vegetation map using these data on GEE?
We've just acquired a few new UAVs from DJI in the past few years with some great technical specifications with regards to RGB+TIR imaging combinations, but we've also had some technical issues arise:
1. How are people dealing with the very special DJI radiometric jpeg format? It appears to be quite different compared to the FLIR r-jpegs, also with some hidden parameters.
2. How are people getting the best image alignment for TIR images in Agisoft or other mosaicking software?
3. How are people extracting the thermal data for vegetation from their resulting images, whether for precision agriculture or for plant phenotyping?
We've had some issues but we've also found some solutions on the way, though the most optimal procedure is still up for discussion!
I participate in an international research project focusing on the relationship of happiness feelings to environmental conditions. Our hypothesis is that happiness may be valued more in regions with favorable environmental conditions. Among other variables we would like to examine the length of the vegetation period in several world regions. Therefore we are looking for data on the different vegetation period arount the globe that can be processed numerically (all our other variables are processed in SPSS). I found some databases but they are either local or employ a formats that are not accessible to most psychologists. I would appreciate any suggestions about how to find global vegetation data.
Hello, everyone!recently we are collecting ground hyperspectral measurement data ( such as soil, vegetation, snow ) with a wavelength range of 400-2500 nm. We have collected some spectral data, but it is still not enough for our research. Therefore, we would like to ask you where there is a free open spectral library ? Or we can cooperate together. Thank you very much.
My article focuses on the changes in Land surface temperature, vegetation, and waterbodies over a long time in an area by using Landsat and Modis data with a new methodology.
How many vegetation indices are there using radar images not multispectral bands?
Is it possible to distinguish between plant geography and vegetal geography?
Is there really a need to distinguish vegetal geography from plant geography?
Do you know if there is any IMPACTED journal WITHOUT APC where environmental and ecological data can be published?
In particular, I am looking for something about 1) soil and vegetation data and 2) communities data.
Dear all,
I am evaluating vegetation recovery 1 year after wildfires in Mediterranean forest ecosystems. I have selected two factors: 1) previous (or not) silviculture treatment to wildfire and 2) exposition (south and north-facing slopes). I consider both factors as fixed factors, right?
Secondly, I have measured vegetation cover at different plots by combining two factors (treatment x facing slope). In the end, I have a matrix containing vegetation cover (in cm) for each plant species measured in the combination of factors (treatment (yesxno); facing slope (NxS)). Shall a first transform the matrix using square root and then build the resemblance matrix? What is best for my analyses ANOSIM or PERMANOVA?
Thirdly, Shall I make any previous analyses like checking the variability of variance or homogeneity of my data?
I am using Primer software.
Thanks in advance
Hi, I have been studying to understand the future climate change impact at the catchment level and its relation to vegetation growth. I found some researchers modified the SWAT version (Fortran code modification?) as well as changing the code (executables). I am not good at programming to find the code location and edit. I am wondering if any researcher could help to provide any documentation on how to modify SWAT executables. I appreciate your support in advance. Thanks
Do you think vegetation indices can be calculated on a toolkit primarily designed for landscape fragmentation. The toolkit accepts all shp files as input layers (Tool- ZonalMetrics-Toolbox).
I have used the toolbox to produce landscape fragmentation indices for my study area and am now attempting to calculate vegetation indices (NDVI/MTCI/EVI). The Class Area (CA), Number of patches per class (NPC), Zone Area (ZA), and Percentage of zone (PZONE) all return the value 0 whenever I attempt to perform the AREA metrics with 5000 hectare size of hexagons.
Multiple attempts have been made in both arcmap and arcgis Pro (link- https://github.com/ZGIS/ZonalMetrics-Toolbox).
For the zonal metrics calculations to treat the ndvi polygons as one CLASS I created a field with the value 1 so that all NDVI shp files contain that number. This attempt yielded a result of 0 as well.
Please let me know if you think it is possible to calculate the vegetation metrics on the 5000 hectare size hexagons.
Kind regards,
Sanjana
waves passing through rigid vegetation
I want to develop a spatial distribution map of my study area correlating NDVI and LST in ArcGIS. Please help me out in the context.
How can I efficiently handle and analyze large remote sensing datasets in Python, specifically for vegetation indices calculation?
I am currently working with a dataset containing multiple years of Landsat imagery, and I want to calculate various vegetation indices such as NDVI, EVI, SAVI, etc. However, my code is running extremely slow and I keep running out of memory.
How can I optimize my code and handle this large dataset in a more efficient manner?
[Important] I don't want to use Google Earth Engine or any online platforms such as Google Colab.
--- Here is my sample code ---
import numpy as np
import rasterio
from rasterio.plot import show
from rasterio.windows import Window
# Open raster file
with rasterio.open("landsat.tif") as src:
# Define window size for processing
win_height, win_width = 256, 256
# Loop through windows to process data
for i, j, window in src.block_windows(1, height=win_height, width=win_width):
# Read data
data = src.read(window=window, out_shape=(src.count, win_height, win_width))
# Calculate vegetation indices
ndvi = (data[3] - data[2]) / (data[3] + data[2])
evi = 2.5 * (data[3] - data[2]) / (data[3] + 6 * data[2] - 7.5 * data[0] + 1)
savi = ((data[3] - data[2]) / (data[3] + data[2] + 0.5)) * 1.5
# Write indices to output file
with rasterio.open("output.tif", 'w', driver='GTiff',
width=win_width, height=win_height, count=3,
crs=src.crs, transform=src.transform,
dtype=np.float32) as dst:
dst.write(ndvi, 1)
dst.write(evi, 2)
dst.write(savi, 3)
Hello
I have some ground soil moisture data for the days of the Sentinel 1 satellite passes.
I want to measure the accuracy of algorithms in estimating soil moisture by using machine learning algorithms and the vegetation index obtained using Sentinel 2 images, but I don't know how to introduce the train and test values to the algorithms.
Thank you for your guidance
I have examined the vegetation cover for 9 sites, using a quadrant and estimating % cover in the quadrant. Each site has 6 measures. There are 3 treatments: ungrazed, extensive grazing and intensive grazing. 3 sites for each grazing regime.
Which statistical tests can I use to examine if treatment impacts the % cover?
Recap:
9 sites in total
3 sites ungrazed
3 sites extensively grazed
3 sites intensively grazed
6 data points per site
cover is estimated as % cover
Thank you!
I wondered if tomatoes could grow in a closed container last summer. So I put some soil in a water bottle and a few tomato seeds and coriander seeds on top of the soil and then covered the seeds with a very thin layer of soil. Afterward, I watered the soil very little, closed the bottle tightly, and placed it on the window side. I didn't touch the bottle again, but after a while, I saw that first lichen-like structures formed in the soil, secondly Elodea-like organisms emerged, and a plant had grown.
How is this whole process possible without anything but oxygen, regular watering, and seeds? And what could be those plants which are growing inside the bottle?
I am using in-situ measured albedo and a new satellite remote-sensed microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) to indicate vegetation water content (VWC). I am looking for any existing physical models or numerical models for the leave to calculate the effects of multiple confounding effects on albedo and to simulate the response of albedo to chlorophyll (Ch) and VWC.
Albedo = F (Ch, VWC, ) Any existing model?
Physical-based albedo model for leave?
What's the best method for dewaxing vegetal fibers with organic solvent? maceration or reflux? And what is the appropriate duration for each method?
Thank you.
I'm doing research on abiotic factors on steppes. But I can't find a source on bedrock effect.
Will the vegetation cover have any major difference in the territory of two different primates? If yes, how can it be studied further?
I have complied LPJ-Guess model using visual basic code. I can run the model with the test data without any errors. I need to run the model for the Australian climate data for vegetation modelling. I am struggling to add the input files using CMake. I am wondering if anyone is or already applied LPJ-Guess in any catchment for vegetation modelling, can assist me. I appreciate any suggestions in advance.
I have a bacterial suspension obtained from vegetal material. I would like to purify it from vegetal material (eg. tannins) to obtain a clean bacterial suspension. Any suggestion?
If I select more training points in specific class such as built up area then built up area dominated in map.
If I select more training points in vegetation class then vegetation areas are dominated in map. What are the reason?
Hello, all:
I am looking for some Open-sourced Downscaling Algorithms or Methods applied to the High-resolution Remote Sensing Data (such as Land Cover/ Vegetation Type and so on).
Could somebody help me out? Appreciate that!
I'm treating BV2 with vegetal compounds in order to study the effect on inflammation.
I am looking for a natural (potential?) vegetation map of Europe that I could use in a GIS framework. I found
Udo B. et al. 2004 Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas. Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe. Maßstab / Scale 1 : 2 500 000
Is there he digital GIS version of it? Is it available on the Internet? Or is there something similar I could use. I would like to use it as a background to illustrate my species distribution maps, showing the main vegetation types in different regions.
How can extracted the building point, vegetation and ground point for terrestrial laser scanner data (point cloud) please suggested the publication and automatic MATLAB code.
Which vegetation-cover/LU/LC data (not TIFF or image files but NetCDF or similar data types) would you suggest investigating a climate simulation over India?
I am looking for literature about "Tugai". The Tugai type of vegetation is a plant complex of river valleys of all altitudinal and landscape zones, and mainly desert, in which communities of the tree, shrub and herbaceous vegetation are combined. Typical Tugais grow in a narrow band in valleys and river deltas - along the banks, islands, on low-lying terraces, interspersed with meadows and thickets of herbaceous vegetation. I have some literature. I am looking for more information to further improve our research. If anyone has literature on this, please share with me. Thank you very much in advance.
I need to do a simulation in a large area but ENVI limits me a lot in size in the Lite version
I have climate and vegetation data by latitude longitude. The vegetation data is a categorical variable with 20 possible options. The climate data is relative frequency of occurrence (RFO) for a dozen climate states - adding up to 100%.
What I want is a model where I can input the vegetation data classification, and it gives a most likely RFO for each climate state.
Using Random Forest models I already know that the climate data can predict the vege classification ~80% of the time, with quite a lot of 'near-misses' according to the confusion matrix, but what I need is the flip-side of this - if I input the vege data, can I get the RFO of the climate states.
I have been looking at K-means clustering, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Multiple Nominal Logistic Regression, but I am unsure if these apply to what I am trying to achieve. I also thought about producing probability densities for each climate state for each vege type, but I am not sure if there is already a method that would do that in a more functional way.
Are their existing statistical or machine learning techniques that achieve what I am trying to do?
Can anyone recommend papers or any kind of publication dealing with updated perspectives on ecological-vegetation succession? Any researchers working on this subject?
Hello everyone.
My team is seeking for a researcher who is conversant with the use of Remote Sensing tools to model vegetation cover/height. We have modelled high-quality daily wind speed data and need to incorporate vegetation height information into it before a highly rated journal accepts the manuscript for publication.
Kindly contact me if you have the required skill.
Thank you.
Hello Everyone,
I am working on a study area dominated by the agricultural landscape, and I have sentinel 2 image for October. I just wanted to understand if there is any way to distinguish / separate crops from natural vegetation in satellite image.
Hi,
I am a newbie, I have a sentinel2 .tiff image, I would like to calculate some vegetation indices, my question is how can I know names of bands composing the .tiff image in-order to select the right bands for the right VI calculation?
I use QGIS SOFTWARE.