Science topics: EngineeringTransmission
Science topic
Transmission - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Transmission, and find Transmission experts.
Questions related to Transmission
Currently, I am trying to determine %reflectance and %transmittance of light through an array of nanofibers in COMSOL 6.2 optics. I have successfully determined reflection and transmission cross-sections. But unfortunately, I can not calculate %reflectance and %transmittance. How can I determine this?
This is a transmission electron microscope picture of salivary gland secretory cells. What is the structure in the picture?
Influenza (flu) remains a significant public health challenge, particularly during peak seasons. This research seeks to explore the effectiveness of various preventive strategies in controlling the spread of the flu. The study will examine the impact of annual flu vaccinations on infection rates among different age groups, as well as assess the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as hand hygiene and mask usage. By comparing these strategies, the research aims to provide insights into the most effective methods for reducing flu transmission and improving public health outcomes.
I want to know if there is any tools in CST to optimize the designed structure to decreease beam level in zero degree.
I am currently working on photonic crystals, where I need to find the transmission vs. wavelength curve in COMSOL Multiphysics. I have eigenfrequencies for the photonic crystal and need to determine the transmission vs. wavelength around those frequencies. I am also providing some images for reference.
I want to simulate the transmission of a Gaussian beam in an optical fiber, and I have used a beam module to complete the modeling of the three-dimensional structure of the optical fiber. When adding port boundary conditions, I only use the system's default mode input. If I want to define a Gaussian beam that deviates from the center of the fiber, I can change the incident setting. Thank you very much for your help.
I have white ink-coated thin film sample transmission data from normal UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Also, %T data were collected using an integrated sphere. There is a huge difference in the spectral data.
Also, data from %R from DRS converted to %T is compared
Please help me to understand the difference between the various %T data obtained from different methods. Which is correct?
Previously, I successfully modelled the transmission and reflection of electromagnetic waves incident on non-magnetic materials. Please refer to my publications for details:
These models use a polynomial approach and apply transverse voltages to the multilayer thin film. The Fresnel transmission and reflection coefficients are calculated based on the refractive index, derived from a general formula for non-magnetic materials. For magnetic materials, these coefficients can be calculated using the general formula based on intrinsic impedance. While refractive index databases are available for most materials across various wavelengths, intrinsic impedance databases are not.
The question now is: How can we model the transmission and reflection of electromagnetic waves incident on magnetic materials when applying a transverse voltage?
I need to do TEM analysis for my Polyaniline emeraldine salt form. May I know which solvent is appropriate for preparing TEM sample?
I need this complete article, could anyone help me? follow theme below.
Chikungunya virus cell-to-cell transmission is mediated by intercellular extensions in vitro and in vivo.
Hi,
I get confused about the CST calculations for reflection and transmission values (S- S-Parameters) for different kinds of transmission lines.
1)First could you please let me know where is the evanescent port mode selection available in CST for waveguide port?
2)If I want to see the S11 parameters of a rectangular waveguide, how does the CST calculate it?
Explain more:
The input impedance of a rectangular waveguide is its wave impedance of dominate mode. So the Zte impedance is not fixed and it varies with frequency. (attachment formula)
So, what type of and what value of waveguide port impedance is considered, for calculating the S11 parameters during the total bandwidth of a dominant mode and also more than dominant mode bandwidth?
3) If the type of TLs are not common or some changes are made, how does CST calculate the S11 for these structures? For popular TLs such as waveguides, we have a common formula.
I appreciate your time and explanation in advance.
Lets have a discussion with regards to OSI physical and datalink layer transmission (signalling) technologies in the presence of quantum assisted crypt analyzers.
We can base our discussion on the advent of the Next generation Networks(NGN) such as 5G Standalone Architecture: 5GCore, 5G Edge, 5G NR and IP eXchange.
Discussion Questions:
------------------------
1. How are these networks going to handle quantum crypt analysis from classical perspective especially where the networks interconnect and interoperate?
2. While newer cryptology modules are being introduced, how likely are they in terms of speed to counter quantum technologies in the interconnect where key exchange handover happens?
3. NGN introduced Network Function Virtualization based on Software Defined Technologies using slices. How likely in terms of quantum that the actual Core Technologies in terms of configuration and Misconfiguration can be compromised to a point that the entire topology can be down affecting the entire ecosystem?
Lets discuss, I am still learning and ready to learn from the experts, where proper phrasing is needed please advise, I will gladly update. OSI L1/L2 as reference model will be a great start.
Hello, when I use a reflective light microscope (with light entering at approximately 45 degrees), I can see a lot of details and textures. I suspect the image may contain some sub-annual lines. However, when I use a transmissive light microscope or a reflective light microscope (with light entering vertically), I can see the main growth lines more clearly, and many micro-growth lines and textures are not visible under oblique light. I am conducting cross-dating and am unsure which perspective of images to use for cross-dating.
Good afternoon,
I was wondering if anyone in UK has a NIR/SWIR microspectrophotometer or a spectrometer for transmission measurements between 850 nm and 2000 nm? Our samples are on a 2 cm x 2cm glass substrate and the sample (from which the transmission will be measured) area is 2mm x 2mm.
Thank you
I am confused as some researchers took s11 below -10 db. and s11 around 0 db. or in some journals s11 approaches to 0 db. and s21 is below -10 db. what is the exact consideration of s11 and s21 parameters while designing a unit cell for lens antenna.
Security is a major concern for IoT devices. How does CIoT leverage existing cellular network security features to protect data transmission between devices and the cloud?
I have applied the SHA-256 hash function to the plain image to generate the initial values of the chaotic map in the image encryption algorithm and include it in key space analysis. So, when the receiver wants to decrypt the received image from the transmission, he needs the key, which is the SHA-256 output. Now, someone has asked me, "SHA-256 hash function is applied, how to transmit the hash values but with no extra transmission"?
Anyone can give me some hints on how to transmit the SHA-256 function output without no extra transmission?
"In what ways might the integration of IoT confront apprehensions surrounding data confidentiality and security, specifically concerning the acquisition, retention, and conveyance of confidential data?"
FTIR spectrum of ZnSe nanoparticles shows that its transmission is not flat around 10 micrometer but in the presented spectrum by lens companies its transmission is smartly flat. What can be the reason? doping? bulk form? or ....
Hi,
In my FDTD simulation result of transmission intensity for IR source (12 µm) over thin film ( thickneess 4µm) at different angles, I found that the intensity is maximum when theta angle is 30.
may i know what could explain this and is there any experiment result to verify?
thanks
I want to determine the effect of radome on plane wave in CST. I want to show the effectiveness of designed radome by Fresnel's coefficient. If any one know How to find Fresnel's transmission coefficient using CST MWS?
Thanks
A certain host viremia threshold for mosquito infection with arboviruses has been recognized, however I have not been able to find any information on the "threshold" of viral load in saliva required for mosquito transmission of arboviruses. Has anyone read anything about this? I would appreciate any helpful comments.
Seeking insights for optimizing data flow.
Good day,
I investigate the 3D FDTD and TMM simulations in terms of the grating waveguide.
I'm currently setting up the simulation environment and verifying the similarity between the 3D FDTD simulations and TMM using the textbook, the 'L. Chrostowski and M. E. Hochberg, Silicon photonics design. Cambridge University Press, 2015.'
Utilizing the script ( of the textbook, it makes my work more convenient to set up the simulation. But, in comparison to the 3D FDTD and TMM, there are some gaps in the transmission graph.
The figure shows two transmissions running just your scripts, matching the physical parameters like 200 number of periods, 310nm period, 50nm delta width, and 500 Npoints.
However, the reflection width of the 3D FDTD is narrower than the TMM although I tuned to the physical parameters.
I know that the corrugation width influences the reflection width in the transmission due to the coupling coefficient, but they are the same.
I was wondering the reason for the difference and I assume the reason is that the TMM doesn't consider the y and z boundary conditions.
I'd be grateful if anyone could help
Thank you
i need simulation tools and more rerfernce about alogaritms used at 5G by NOMA
I want to design a reconfigurable transmit array using varactor diode with metamaterial unit cell. I have gone through many literatures but in most of literature only different design and multiplayers are mentioned to achieve maximum transmission and 360 deg phase tuning. But i am not able to achieve both the things like high transmission and 360deg phase tuning. Could anyone suggest some resources to understand mathematics behind this?
I am looking for ways to activate DREADDs in pups and was wondering if anyone could share experience/thoughts on whether CNO can be transmitted through maternal milk ? Thanks!
I have a question about the use of the sbdart radiation transmission software. I want to enter a custom atmospheric profile. One of the physical quantities is the water vapor density, so I don’t know from what data to get this characteristic value, or is there any way to do it Calculated, I hope everyone's help.
When I fuse the multi-single-multi fiber structure, coat it with silver film to stimulate the SPR phenomenon, and establish the transmission spectrum, I add water to the sensing area. The spectral line of the SPR transmission spectrum rises, but it should normally decrease. What is the reason? Thank you!
When I fuse the multi-single-multi fiber structure, coat it with silver film to stimulate the SPR phenomenon, and establish the transmission spectrum, I add water to the sensing area. The spectral line of the SPR transmission spectrum rises, but it should normally decrease. What is the reason? Thank you!
I want to measure the phase angle in comsol.
In my NetSim 5G simulation, I keep seeing zero throughput, indicating no data transmission. Any suggestions on the factors or settings causing this, like (a) verifying correct gNB and UE configuration, (b) identifying network topology or connectivity errors, etc.? What steps can I take to understand and resolve this?
In one of our fiber photometry rigs, there is a pigtailed rotary joint connected to an FC-FC mating adapter (flange 11mm) that is then connected to our fiber optic patch cord. The problem is, the light transmission out of the pigtail is around 90 uW, and the adapter is pretty much the same, but then when we measure light transmission out of the fiber optic patch cord its around 20-30 uW. Is there any way to better optimize this region to get a higher light output?
Thanks!
There are two different waves of the gravitational field (GF):
1. Gravitational field transverse wave. What it reflects is the disturbance of the surrounding GF, and the transmission speed of this disturbance is equal to the slow light speed c. For example, the motion of the sun disturbs the GF generated by the center of the galaxy, causing transverse waves of GF around the sun.
2. Gravitational field longitudinal wave. It is generated by the gravitational source itself, and GF will transfer energy quickly, and this speed is much greater than the speed of light c.
When the gravitational source changes (position, mass), this change will first be reflected on the longitudinal wave of GF, and distant objects will feel the change of GF soon. At the same time, the disturbance of the gravitational source to other surrounding GFs will propagate to the surroundings at a slow speed c in the form of transverse waves.
To make an inappropriate analogy: when you throw a stone into a calm lake, you will observe slow water waves spreading around, which is the disturbance of the stone to the water surface, thus generating water waves. But in addition to water waves, there are sound waves in the water. The speed of the sound waves is much faster than that of the water waves, and the sound waves in the water arrive long before the slow water waves reach the shore.
A brief summary: the longitudinal wave of GF is produced by the gravitational source itself, and the transverse wave of GF is produced by the disturbance of the gravitational source to other surrounding GFs.
Newtonian gravity studies "sound waves in water", the longitudinal waves of GF.
Einstein GR studies the "water wave", that is, the transverse wave of GF.
I hope that you can understand the whole gravity from my simple narrative. You can also download my two papers on gravity here:
Kind regards,
Tony
Hello researchers,
I've encountered a problem while utilizing Shannon's formula to calculate the transmission rate from various sources. It appears that the transmission rate is highly sensitive to distance given the values we're working with. Some results seem peculiar. For instance, why does it take 7 minutes to transmit data over 30 km, but 1000 days to transmit over 10,000 km?
Here are the parameters we are currently using:
- wireless_bandwidth_lb: 10 Mbit/s
- wireless_bandwidth_ub: 50 Mbit/s
- transmission_power: 0.6 Watts
- h (Channel fading coefficient): 0.8
- omega (white_gaussian_noise_power): 0.008 Watts
- theta (path_loss_exponent): 2.5
I suspect that "theta" is the main issue. A high theta value makes the result extremely sensitive to the distance. Therefore, we need a more reasonable value for theta. It's virtually impossible to run experiments and obtain sensible results with such skewed inputs.
Does anyone have suggestions or recommendations for these parameters?
Research Specific Objectives
Dear ResearchGate members,
On one hand, there is a theory giving the reflection/transmission coefficients when acoustic planes waves propagating in a medium (rho0, c0) reach a finite thickness object (rho1, c1) with normal incidence. Such theory basically gives the thicknesses (n*lambda1/2) at which the object is theoretically acoustically transparent - of course, the width of the reduced reflection depends on the impedance mismatch between the 2 media – and the thicknesses ([2n-1]*lambda1/4) at which the object is fully reflective.
On the other hand, there is also theory giving the variation of the reflection coefficient depending on the incident angle of acoustic plane waves at the interface between two semi-infinite media (rho0, c0; rho1, c1). Over a critical angle (depending on the impedance mismatch between the two media), the reflection is theoretically total.
Now, here is my question: What is the behavior of the acoustic waves when the two phenomena are considered at the same time? If the plane waves reach a surface with an incident angle, and the reflective medium is finite in thickness (acoustic mirror)?
By experience and through simulations, it appears that over the critical angle, the reflection is not total, even with a mirror thickness for which the reflection is theoretically total.
Thanks a lot in advance.
I have a finite array of unit cells, completely backed with PEC. When I try to illuminate it with incident plane wave, I get strong scattered waves from the PEC, apart from scattering at desired directions. But the PEC at the back of the metasurface is supposed to block transmission of the incident wave. Still I get strong far field scattering.
I used both open boundary and FE-BI boundaries for the whole metasurface array for this this purpose with no positive results.
Kindly help me.
which "study", from comsol, to use to calculate the transmission spectrum of 2D photonic crystal device? And how to configure it? Basically the device is a crystaline network of silicon rods immersed in air with defects that form 4 channels. I used Domain wavelength, but my results weren't very good.
Q. How can I give different transmissivity with more than 3 wavelength region?
I used Discrete Ordinates (DO) Model since it is the only model with 'semi-transparent' and 'non-gray' mode.
I want to give material A (semi-transparent) transmissivity or emissivity like this:
ex) t=0.75 in 0 to 4 µm, or e = 0.25
t= 0.75 in 4 ~8 µm, or e = 0.25
t=0.75 in 8~14 µm, or e = 0.25
t = 0.0001 in 14 – 1000 µm, or e = 0.9999
(t is transmissivity), e = emissivity.
But when I change BC type of a material A from opaque to semi-transparent in boundary condition - radiation tab,
I made four bands, 0 – 4, 4 – 8, 8-14, 14-1000 µm in Model - Radiation - Number of Bands, but I could only change Direct / Diffuse Irradiation and Diffuse Fraction of each band, not transmissivity or emissivity of each band.
Please, someone can guide me, it would be a great help,
Is it possible to give each band different emissivity?
Given the possible risk of blood transfusion as a mode of transmission for blood-borne illnesses, it is vital to know about the transfusion-transmissible infections prevalent among blood donors. With this, what are the transfusion-transmissible diseases that are commonly found among blood donors?
Reference: Kebede, E., Getnet, G., Enyew, G., & Gebretsadik, D. (2020). Transfusion transmissible infections among voluntary blood donors at Dessie Blood Bank, Northeast Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study. Infection and drug resistance. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762780/
Transfusion-transmitted infections are a threat to people's lives, and this is due to unsafe blood donation and improper pre-transfusion testing procedures. In line with this, what are some of the protocols in place to prevent these infections? What are some of the diseases prevented by these protocols?
What is its transmission property at millimeter wave bands?
Synthetic sex dolls are presently sold on global scale to replace human commercial sex workers in brothels, where the dolls can be used by multiple users. Can the use of these products increase the prevalence of STDs? Because, the dolls could be used by multiple users, serving as fomite for indirect transmission of STDs from an infected inanimate object to a susceptible person. Are the synthetic sex dolls safe at all?
What is the most recent technique used in mitigating transmission losses?
#SARSCoV2 is airborne - I am interested in finding the most recent / definitive research into its nature and protection from transmission. Thank you.
Are there options other than low melt agarose for the embedding of bacterial cells for transmission electon microscope?
And what about using Epredia™ HistoGel™ Specimen Processing Gel?
Thanks
Good evening, build a demultiplexer based on 2D photonic crystal in Comsol and I would like to know how do I insert a Gaussine source at the input of device and ports to analyze the transmission at the outputs?
The promising cell-free massive MIMO seems to be similar to some other structures, such as Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission (CoMP), Centralized RAN, Distributed MIMO etc. What are the pros and cons that differentiate them from each other? That's a little bit confusing.
Hello everyone,
I have made several optical phantoms with different weight ratio of ink into PDMS, from 0wt% to 5wt%. I have measured the transmission (%) and reflection (%) of each sample.
From there I calculated the absorption with the Beer-Lambert law, A=log(I0/I), with I0 being the transmission with 0wt% of ink and I the transmission of the sample desired.
I can therefore get the absorption coefficient of the phantoms with the formula: ua = A/thickness.
Therefore I have a linear relationship between the weight percentage of the phantoms and their absorption coefficient.
Now my issue is that I want to create a phantom of 2cm thickness but with a ratio of ink to PDMS known.
Should I assume the absorption coefficient will not change from the 2mm sample to the 2cm one ?
Otherwise, how do I determine the absorption coefficient of my new phantom?
Of course, I cannot measure the transmission of this sample as it is too thick now.
Thank you for your help!
For a single layer anti-reflective coating, people generally say if the layer thickness is λ/4, the reflection could reduce and transmission increase.
As the figure, because the light was reflected by second interface and therefore there was additional optical path of λ/2, resulting destructive interference of reflection. Because 1-F(reflection)=T(transmission) ; so T increases.
However, if we think the transmission in the same way. The destructive interference of transmission also happens, doesn't it? How could we say the transmission increase?
If anyone is familiar with anti-reflective coating? Please help me. THANKS!
How to get visible light communication GFDM with 6g for transmission and receiver MATLAB code, please??
GFDM MATLAB code for transmission and receiver
How many percent of the disinfectants used in dentistry prevent the possibility of hepatitis transmission during tooth filling?
Hello dear colleagues!
I want to present my results regarding water vapour transmission rate. I have 5 samples and I worked in triplicate. Do I apply the formula for each sample (1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c etc) and then calculate the mean and SD or do I calculate the mean value and SD for each sample (1, 2, 3 etc) and then apply the formula?
the formula used is (initial weight-final weight)/ (areax24)
So should i use (initial weight of sample 1a - final weight of sample 1a) / (areax24) and calculate the mean and SD for sample 1
or calculate mean and DS of samples 1a, 1b, 1c and apply formula as(mean of initial weight of sample 1 - mean of final weight of sample 1) / (areax24)
I want to present my results as the number given by the formula +/- DS
We have several old TEM that we need to get rid of to make some place for a new one, a Philips EM300, a JEOL 1200EX, and a JEOL 1230. The last one is still in function but will be replaced soon, while the others are stored since many years. Both JEOL are fully functional. We don't have enough room for them, and we don't have money to pay for more than one service contract at the time.
What should we do with them ? Any idea ?
crystallite size is usually determined by X- ray diffraction. Can it be cross verified by transmission ebsd (t-ebsd)?
Broadband dielectric characterization of materials in the microwave and millimetre bands implies to measure the S-parameters and then convert them to complex permittivity values. In reflection mode, only S11 can be measured. But in transmission mode, S21 can also be measured. Does this mean that transmission method could have an advantage over the reflection method? especially in detecting small variations in the dielectric permittivity of the sample under test?
I have the thickness data and dielectric tensor from ellipsometry
I've been trying to produce result for the paper of Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Resource Allocation in Cooperative UAV-Assisted Wireless Networks. I am having difficulties in understanding logic of Phase2: Transmission from UAVs to UE which I only implemented set of UE group associated to UAV, not randomly distributed as in the paper. I'm wondering if someone can help me. I'd appreciate if I can get source code as a reference. Thank you.
We are conducting a research on "ELECTRICITY ENERGY IN AFRICA’S DEVELOPMENT GOALS, THE CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS: THE CASE OF NIGERIA".
Your expert answer (s) will be highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Ajinde Oluwashakin and Ayodeji Salau
Is there any relationship between stl and absorption coefficient?
Suppose i am getting a peak at 400Hz (90% absorption) then at the same frequency what will be the sound transmission loss(it will be minimum or maximum or we can not say).
Any Reference available on CNTFET:
1. CNTFET as PTL (Pass Transistor Logic)
2. CNTFET as Transmission Gate
3. Effect of Temperature on CNTFET based Circuits (Formulae showing relation between Temperature vs Power/Voltage)
4. CNTFET as always ON/always OFF transistor.
I would like to know the theoretical calculations for these ranges in WiFi 802.11. Since I am new to WiFi these are somewhat confusing. In case some one knows NetSim, how are these ranges implemented in the simulator as against the correct theory?
If anyone know a literature available that justify, how much minimum transmission amplification energy is required for a node to transmit data at certain distance. So, accordingly, networks amplification energy can be set.
Hello everyone, I'm trying to understand the nondimensionalization of the study "Modelling cholera transmission dynamics in the presence of limited resources" by Farai Nyabadza, Jennifer Mawunyo Aduamah1 and Josiah Mushanyu. I just wanna know how the substitutions were derived in order for them to nondimensionalize the model. Please see the pictures for your reference. Thank you in advance.
I can’t distinguish between TE and TM? I used the wave optics module, physics ( ewfd ) also physics (ewbe) then I used global evaluation then transmission but I can’t distinguish between TE transmission and TM transmission ???? so could you please help me to calculate the extinction ratio (ER) from the formula (1-a) and (1-b) attached in the file?