Transhumanism - Science topic

1)

2)

When I point unpleasant things out, people often respond by insulting me. So, under complete eugenics I would either have been killed and or castrated at this point.

If Nazis do gain control over the USA, I may be killed first because they really hate white looking people with disabilities and or subtle non white ancestry.

The more North Western European liberal nations become multiracial democracies, the more a select few elite North Western Europeans turn into the leadership base. Hence why so many politicians and other elites are North Western Europeans. Thus, the "Great Replacement" should really be named the "Great Filter" because it consolidates whiteness(state of being North Western European). North Western European liberals did not just coincidentally invent transhumanism and eugenics.

Work Cited

My most thought provoking posts so far:

10)

9)

8)

7)

6)

5)

4)

3)

2)

1)

I am somewhat Hegelian because I do not believe in martyrdom, and or dying on a hill, and usually the popular, and or traditional, opinion has a deeper less obvious reason.

I no longer feel attracted to women nor men. I prefer robots. Liberals rightfully oppose racial animosity while acknowledging heritability to further DEI. If I make a controversial claim and no one directly opposes it then they may be silently agreeing. For right or wrong "As (insert morally superior identity) then argument" translates to "my word has more credibility because of my identity." As one of the MOST disliked people by the Nazis, I opine about race relations. Whether overt or covert, North Western Europeans("NWE") are highly eugenic and or transhumanist, hence in their most exclusionary known ideology (Nazism) they especially want to either castrate and or kill people that look like them yet have subtle non-NWE ancestry and or disabilities. Because subtle non-NWE ancestry and disabilities are both possibly hereditary. I have both subtle non-NWE ancestry and at least one(maybe multiple) disabilities(all probably hereditary), hence my right to opine about race relations. Few actually believe in martyrdom and would go through with it. A true martyr would be fired for holding integrity, courage and honor all over reputation. I will respect the authority for the common good. I also am not heterosexual, thus adding to my right to opine about race relations. My asexuality may make me a better Catholic because I seek to be fruitful and multiply(via robot sex) without acting on lust. Sir Francis Galton(Anglo Liberal and Darwin's cousin) invented eugenics. Sir Julian Huxley(Anglo Liberal, both brother of author Aldous Huxley and grandson of Darwin's Bulldog(TH Huxley) started the transhumanist movement. Sir Julian Huxley also coined the term transhumanism. Some argue principles only count if the actor's needs are met. I think principles only count if the actor's needs are met. Hence, I do not believe in nor practice martyrdom. Financial blackmail may be worse than the emotional kind because the latter usually comes from a less powerful person. More power means more potential culpability.

Who agrees philosophies can make interesting acronyms? How? Why?

My answer: My condensed philosophy is Humanitarianism, AntiRacism and transhumanism. Which makes the acronym HAT. I am no longer Marxist because materialism no longer appeals to me( hence my philosophical acronym used to be ATM standing for AntiRacist, Transhumanist and Marxist).

Reasons I am no longer a materialist:

(Souls Probably Exist) Source: ).

🔴Human-GOD coevolution & the Religion-type of the future (technology; genetics; medicine; robotics; informatics; AI Algorithm & Quantum PC;..)🔴

--One GOD.

--Multiple and diverse GOD.

--Absence of Transcendence.

Moreover: GOD will be an evolutionary step of Human??

In this link (chapter pag.40) there is a quasi-fantasy scenario ...

•

•

•

● Other papers of this series ●

🟥

Draft chapters of my new book on The Psychology of Artificial Superintelligence (Springer/Nature 2020) are now available. This includes chapters on

Explanation (XAI, rule-extraction)

Digital Clones

Transhumanism and

Neo-Luddism

I welcome feedback on these chapters. Please email j.diederich@uq.edu.au

Many thanks,

Jo

At the Kazan Federal University (Russian Federation), I help organize the VII conference of the Sadykov reading."Society 5.0: The Paradoxes of the Digital Future". But I do not know how to find new contacts who may be interested to participate in.

Conference working languages: Russian, English, Chinese.

Workshops topics:

- Digital Paradise or "hello" from Big Brother?

- Homo Digitalis: Hopes, Risks, Prospects.

- Transformation of Knowledge and Education in a Digital Society

- Ontology of Virtual and Augmented Reality.

- Digital Humanity as a New Interdisciplinary Paradigm.

- Is Society 5.0. a step Towards Transhumanism?

- The fourth industrial revolution and digital capitalism.

I found only these: "A Spherical Camera Sensor

A stretchable circuit allows researchers to make simple, high-quality camera sensors." http://www.technologyreview.com/news/410562/a-spherical-camera-sensor/

"The Boston Retinal Implant Project": http://www.bostonretinalimplant.org/

"Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis" Jaemin Kim et al.

Nature Communications 5, Article number: 5747 doi:10.1038/ncomms6747

2014 http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/141209/ncomms6747/full/ncomms6747.html

Health, Science, Politics

I am working on a paper about transhumanism, and specifically the point at which we would say a person is "no longer human" and has become "posthuman". I'm interested in hearing people's thoughts on exactly how much change would qualify someone as posthuman, and any references to literature already existing on the subject would be much appreciated.

I have seen one writer suggest that a posthuman state is achieved when the genetics of the individual no longer match human genetics, but I don't think that accounts for posthumanization from cybernetics, and other technological enhancements. I saw someone else suggest that posthumanism occurs when reproductive abilities become impossible, specifically breeding with normal humans, but I think there are already plenty of people with reproduction problems and while this is one of the better suggestions it is still fairly weak.

Let me know what you think! What is that line in between pacemakers and robot bodies where we have changed ourselves enough to be considered posthuman?