Tissue Mechanics - Science topic

To answer your question, the values of kc, ke, and d in the force-velocity relationship may not be the same for all types of muscles. The force-velocity relationship is influenced by several factors, including the muscle fiber type, the size and length of the muscle, and the contractile history of the muscle. Therefore, the parameters kc, ke, and d may vary depending on the specific muscle being modeled.

In order to determine the values of kc, ke, and d for different muscles, experimental data is typically needed. These parameters can be determined by fitting the force-velocity relationship to experimental data obtained from measurements of muscle force and shortening velocity under different conditions, such as varying levels of activation or different types of contractions. Alternatively, these parameters can be estimated using a combination of experimental and modeling techniques, such as inverse modeling or parameter optimization.

It is also important to note that the force-velocity relationship is often simplified in muscle models, and may not fully capture the complex interactions that occur within the muscle during contraction. Therefore, while the parameters kc, ke, and d can provide useful insights into the behavior of skeletal muscles, their values should be interpreted with caution and should be validated against experimental data whenever possible.

Dear all, I have the same problem. The only data I can find regarding the molecular composition of different body tissues is from the 1980s or older. It´s seems to be really basic knowledge of high importance (e.g. for pharmacokinetic modelling purposes). Modern analytical techniques should allow more acurate, maybe hyphenated, determination....So does anybody know a more recent publication which covers this topic? Thanks in regard

Can you further explain your question?

Definitely no

Sophie Roux

Hi Dear Sophie,

Thank u very much. I'll chock out it for sure.

Dear Mehrshad,

on elf the best reviews in the field of cortical and trabecular bone adaptation due to osteoporosis is the following one

Kind regards,

Ramona Ritzmann

' Hi , Not fully , but yes there is .

That is my understanding as well. DAB is a precipitate, a very large one. Even if you could somehow rehydrate the tissue by first soaking in xylene and then in alcohol and then finally water (the reverse of the dehydration protocol) I do not think you will be able to resolubilize the DAB. Not in any way that won't completely destroy your tissue anyways.

Sorry for the bad news, but maybe try talking to a representative from Vector Labs. They make DAB and AP kits, they might be able to help you with an answer.

I have no experiance

I add up to 10ng/ml bFGF (also called FGF2) to DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS & Glutamine. The cells grow very well under these conditions. I used from 2 different companies (Peprotech and then a cheaper one, prospec) and both work fine!

All the best!

Thank Johanna and Torry.

I used Less than 4 mins for trypsin with concentraiton of 0.25%.

I tried to remove DMSO on the second day and immediately by pellet after thaw, both gave me similar results on the cell attachment.

And yes, the floating cells are dead at >70% (via trypan blue).

Fumarate does copolymerize fast with an electron donor monomer such as N-vinyl pyrollidone however: http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://eprints.qut.edu.au/38756/1/c38756.pdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1RBfBpP5FmQUvXVKhGpRiGuOoXWQ&oi=scholarr&ei=iunlUbwB7rOJB-HxgdAI&ved=0CC8QgAMoAjAA