Thematic Analysis - Science topic

Usually themes emerge from the connection between two or more codes. But is it possible to have a theme that is based on a single code? Is there a reference supporting that?

For thematic analysis or interpretation of the data.

Qualitative data analysis involves examining non-numerical data to identify patterns and themes. Various tools support different analysis methods: 1. Content Analysis Content analysis is a research technique to interpret textual data by identifying patterns, themes, or concepts. It involves coding and categorising qualitative data to quantify certain elements within the content. Best Tool for Content Analysis: ✅ hashtag#Looppanel is an AI-powered tool that transcribes interviews, extracts themes and automates coding for large datasets. 2. Thematic Analysis Thematic analysis is used to identify, analyse, and report patterns (themes) within qualitative data. Best Tools for Thematic Analysis: ✅ hashtag#Looppanel – offers AI-driven features to identify recurring themes and patterns in transcripts, making it a strong choice for thematic analysis. ✅ hashtag#Nvivo – A widely used software for coding, categorising, and visualising qualitative data, helping researchers track themes across different sources such as text, audio, and video. 3. Narrative Analysis Narrative analysis focuses on studying how people construct and communicate stories about their experiences. Best Tools for Narrative Analysis: ✅ hashtag#Atlas.ti: Known for its flexibility in handling large qualitative datasets, hashtag#Atlas.ti enables researchers to code narratives, visualise relationships, and conduct in-depth text analysis. ✅ hashtag#Delve: Designed specifically for narrative research, Delve allows for intuitive coding and organisation of interview transcripts to uncover key storytelling elements. 4. Grounded Theory Analysis Grounded theory involves developing theories based on systematically gathered qualitative data. Researchers use iterative coding to derive emerging themes. Best Tools for Grounded Theory Analysis: ✅ hashtag#Delve- provides structured coding tools that align well with grounded theory’s iterative approach, making it easier to refine concepts as the research progresses. ✅ hashtag#MAXQDA is a powerful tool for qualitative researchers conducting grounded theory analysis, offering extensive coding, categorisation, and visualisation features. 5. Discourse Analysis Discourse analysis examines how language is used in texts, conversations, and media to understand underlying social and cultural meanings. Best Tools for Discourse Analysis: ✅ hashtag#MAXQDA: offers advanced text analysis, linguistic features, and coding capabilities, making it suitable for discourse research. ✅ hashtag#Quirkos: A user-friendly tool that allows researchers to categorise, link, and explore discourse elements in a visually interactive way. Choosing the right tool depends on the research methodology, the complexity of the data, and the desired level of automation. Would you like recommendations on how to use these tools for your specific research? Read more at #capterra.com, #delvetool.com, #quirkos.com, and #atlasti.com.

Do you think research gate is a good place to publish for the first time

Hello everyone, I hope you're having a great day. I'm currently a bit confused about whether I should use IPA or thematic analysis. I have already decided on thematic analysis, but I have stated that my research is based on a phenomological epistemology. Since thematic analysis is quite flexible, I would appreciate any suggestions on how I can align it with a phenomenological approach.

For background im conducting an interview based research with the aim to explore how individuals' interactions with social media shape experiences around body image among South Asians

Thank you

Hello everyone, I am a novice researcher and am currently planning my thesis. I have a question regarding my methodology. I am unsure which methodology my research question best fits into — for example, whether it aligns more with Grounded Theory, Phenomenology, or another approach. Is it acceptable to simply state that my study is qualitative, or do I need to specify a particular methodology? Additionally, I am uncertain about whether I should include a theoretical framework in my thesis. My background section in my thesis will include secondary research citations that discuss potential barriers to exercise prescription, such as beliefs, knowledge, and social norms, which align with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Should I explicitly reference this theory as my framework, or would it suffice to mention these factors in the background without formally linking it to a theory? I would greatly appreciate any feedback or advice on this! Thank you!

Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. It’s widely used because it helps researchers make sense of large amounts of data by grouping similar ideas or topics. For example, if you interview school stakeholders about health promotion in schools, thematic analysis can help uncover common concerns like lack of awareness, infrastructure challenges, or the need for teacher training.

Citation: Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Just sharing my experience of doing thematic analysis for my in-depth interviews conducted:

When conducting in-depth interviews for a qualitative study on school stakeholders, i tried to compose the responses in spoken language -verbatims and then to transcripts. Well ,with a little of my experience of qualitative research, can suggest a few approaches handle large datasets in qualitative studies, please note that it requires the following for effective management:

- Guys methodically classifying unprocessed data (e.g., coding transcripts in qualitative data analysis programs such as Atlas.ti or NVivo)- I have personally used Atlas ti and personally loved it. (becos of the web version)

- later considered dividing data into digestible categories using early coding frameworks.

The next challenging phase needs more focus- please note how it was handled..... The categories were iteratively refined to prevent redundancy and data saturation.

Claude AI has been used as a research tool and writing assistant to improve college students' writing skills and research activities. I am interested in studies related to the ethical use of AI in qualitative research (Reflexive Thematic Analysis) and if any journal has recently been published.

Happy to share knowledge,

Anitha

Dear researchers,

Please help me with this issue.

I used Delvetool.com to analyse my qualitative data after I found my edited transcripts were lost in Nvivo and no cause could be found for it. I also felt that Nvivo is quite complicated to use, while Delve is much more straightforward. However, the ethics committee at my university had never heard of Delve before and raised a concern to me about the data storage in Delve. Delve uses 3rd party processors, which means that the data uploaded in Delve is stored in a number of external servers. Delve developers argued that they have listed all 3rd party processors on their website and they are all well-known and trusted (https://delvetool.com/subprocessors).

I have searched and found a few publicated papers that used Delve for thematic analysis. It is really hard for me to go back and use Nvivo now. Could you please advise me if there would be serious ethics concerns to uploading data into Delve and using it for thematic analysis?

Thanks a lot!

Sincerely,

Siying

Method 1. Analysis of semi structured interviews using Reflexive thematic analysis. (Supervisors advice)

Method 2. Analysis of the same interviews through a critical realist lens. (My preference). Doing both is my compromise.

Respected sir ,

i am a phd scholar in rehabilitation sciences - Speech language pathology. i want your guidance regarding the inter rater relibality calculation using cohans kappa in qualitative interview. after the thematic analysis has been done . what steps are to be followed for calculating the inter rater relibality.

Thanks and regards

I am conducting pilot tests with the three groups that I am going to conduct a focus group with later (adolescents, parents and coaches).

In addition to refining the questions and identifying possible errors and improvements prior to the focus groups, can I use the extracted results for later inclusion in the TA?

How should I structure the sections of my dissertion when using reflexive thematic analysis with five main themes? Specifically, is it appropriate to use subheadings to describe aspects of each theme rather than identifying them as distinct sub-themes?

I have a theoretical framework for preparing a interview guide to assess the unmet care needs of a sub population of chronically ill patients and their caregivers(dyadic interviews).

My research will explore parents' perceptions regarding a specific disease and the research objectives will be derived from a particular theory (Health Belief Model) in a particular cultural context using qualitative methodology. Although I will be using the deductive approach with a priori coding based on the theory, I do not want to ignore additional themes as they might prove to be useful (inductively).

My question is Can I use Thematic analysis, as proposed by Braun & Clarke (2006), or the latest version- reflexive thematic analysis- which one is suitable for deductive and inductive analysis?

Any recommendations for another analytic approach?

I want to be clear about the analytic approach before beginning.

Thanking everyone in advance.

Best regards,

Does anyone know of any published articles that provide guidance on using TA with multiple team members?

I am aware of one (see below), however, there are some disagreements in terms of some of the guidance.

Article: Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis

I am doing a thematic analysis from interviewees done with my main group of interviewees. I also have done two interviews with another group of interviewees which provided interesting insights into two of the six themes that I have identified. Is it okay to integrate the insights from these two interviews in the discussion of the themes they related to?

As I have only done two interviews with this other groups, it is not enough to do a separate thematic analysis for. And as they cover a different set of questions, I can not integrate them into my main thematic analysis.

For my research, I have identified three areas in the literature where there is still contension. I am doing interviews to address these areas and provide insights based on the interviews. I now want to analyze the interviews based on the three predefined categories, but I am confused how to do this. I want to look at the data from the three categories, but within those three categories, I want to find patterns and themes without any predetermined ideas. What is the best way to do this?

And in terms of writing the research: is it acceptable to structure it according to the three predefined categories and then describe the themes that emerged within these categories?

I am going into my inductive thematic analysis with three research questions. In the results section, is it okay to structure it according to these three research questions, presenting the themes that relate to one of the research questions under each subheading?

Using thematic analysis on our research on Identity Negotiation of Female Gaming Streamers in our local area, we have developed INT elements (communication process, biculturalism, and self-presentation) that may be useful for a deductive approach, while also using the 10 core assumptions of Stella Ting-Toomey for our interview guide, is this a good idea to proceed with out study? or should we switch to an Inductive approach and let the date go with the flow?

I'm conducting a thematic analysis for my interview methodology (part of my thesis). The interview focuses on validating the metrics used to compare web application security testing tools, which I've identified from my literature review. I'm currently confused about codes and themes. I'm finding it confusing. As I mentioned, I've conducted a literature review and identified 37 metrics. Should I take those 37 metrics as codes, or is there something else I should use as a code? If there's something else, could you provide one or two examples? Please help me. If my 37 metrics are codes then I'm thinking of using 4 themes:

Commonly Used Metrics Additional Metrics Metrics that are Considered Unimportant Evolving Landscape of Web Application Security

Can someone please clarify this?

i am currently conducting a critical appraisal of a research article and the data analysis is explained as:

interviews transcribed verbatim and participants were given the option to review and revise. transcripts were coded with nvivo software using constant comparison approach. each researcher conducted a round of coding before developing more focused codes in relation to research question.

my question relates to whether this is categorically thematic analysis, or grounded theory? as such, no theory is espoused at the end of the study as such.

I've been searching for a specific analysis that falls under INT in the B.A. Communication path. I was wondering if this analysis could be applicable if done on Female Gaming Streamers in a localized area? Thank you!!

Hello, I am currently conducting my undergraduate dissertation on exploring how Primary school teachers interpret 'disruptive' behaviour.

My main objectives are:

1) What do teachers define as disruptive behaviour?

2) What do they attribute disruptive behaviour to?

I have already conducted my research in a school setting, using Interpretive Phenomenology as my methodology and semi-structured interviews as my method. I interviewed 11 teachers and my questioned aligned with the chosen methodology - focusing on their experiences.

I have transcribed all of my data and am now ready to proceed with analysing it.

However, I'm a bit stuck! As a complete beginner I am only confidently familiar with thematic analysis. I've had a look at using IPA seems as it would completely align with my methodology, but there are a lot more steps to it. I am of course willing to complete said steps, but I am also conscious that my whole dissertation is only 8000 words, so I have that to take into account.

Also, I do need to find similarities and differences across the data set as a whole.

So, if anyone can give me any guidance, it would be appreciated!

Finally, am I 'allowed' to use a different method of analysis- such as thematic analysis when I have conducted IP as my methodology?

If so, and I do go with thematic analysis, would that mean that it was then not worthwhile me doing IP as my methodology?

So many questions! Please note, I am only an undergraduate student (level 6) so I am still very much learning. Thank you!

Dear All,

Can anyone recommend a suitable method for analysing qualitative data—any method that uses the hybrid approach to thematic analysis of both the deductive and inductive analysis?

regards,

Sarah

I want to commence a study on thematic analysis of cinema about depiction of certain characteristics in the characters of the cinema. What are the different frameworks that are useful in situating the research questions in a cinema context, coding and data analysis?

I am soon to begin writing my thesis as the culmination of my master's studies in Clinical Nursing. I would like to explore nurses' experiences and, therefore, plan to conduct interviews. I aim to take a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach but use Braun and Clarke's Thematic Analysis as a method of finding themes in then transcribed text. However, I find it a bit challenging to determine whether this is feasible, as phenomenology and hermeneutics have their own methods for analyzing transcribed text. For instance, is it possible to employ Heidegger's philosophy as a theoretical framework, but use Thematic Analysis as the method to identify the themes in the transcribed text?

I hope some one can help to clarify.

My design of study is interpretative phenomenology ( study on experiences of operating room staff in robotic assisted surgeries). Could I use thematic analysis or IPA? As my design is Interpretative phenomenology, is it mandatory that I should use IPA?

I'm interested in seeing how these qualitative methods have been applied to sociolinguistic work or if they have at all.

Qualitative research Frontiers.

I am completing an evaluation using pre collected data from a training group which has been around for a few years. The way the data was collected was by using a questionnaire which allows for short/ medium answers.

I am unsure if a thematic analysis is the best way forward and if so I am unsure if there is a certain way that I should do it.

Thank you in advance

I've gathered 8 interviews of an intended 12-14 participants for my research. I'm going through them now anonymizing transcripts and wanted to clarify if there is any rationale on when you should begin analysing the transcripts? Should I wait until I have collected all of them and finished the data collection stage or would it be fine to begin reading through the transcripts now for the familiarisation stage and developing preliminary codes?

To clarify I'm utilising a reflexive thematic analysis approach with an inductive and deductive coding method.

Thanks

For my master thesis, I'm starting a research about siblings of adults with intellectual disabilities that live in a residential facility. My research is about how the siblings experience having a caregiving role for their brother/sister with a disability and sharing the caregiving with professional caregivers. It's not easy to share caregiving with professionals who have different views and not the personal relationship like the siblings have with their brother/sister with a disability. I want to do semistructured interviews with siblings and also focus groups with professional caregivers.

I'm not sure what analysis I would do because it is about experiences that make me look at IPA, but a thematic analysis would work too and is more available for beginners.

Can someone give advice? (English is not my main language)

I was looking for research papers that have employed descriptive statistics to analyse quantitative data which are mostly categorical/dichotomous variables and thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data in a sequential explanatory mixed methods research.

I've always read that thematic analysis is often used on interviews and transcripts. But can I use it for analyzing multiple related studies to prove that the research problem of my study is relevant?

This is the first time that I'm using thematic analysis to interpret a data in my research. I'm interpreting an open-ended question from my survey. I'm currently working on the themes that has emerged from the codes I have made. However I'm wondering, where do we base the relevance of themes? Are there any kinds of measurement that can be used to measure this? I did try to see the frequency of each themes and from that calculated the percentage, but is it okay to use that for thematic analysis?

Has anyone got suggestions for types of qualitative analysis that combine inductive and deductive approaches? For a project I'm working on, we identified a relevant pre-existing framework about accessibility maturity with 5 key areas. We've completed semi-structured interviews about strengths and barriers in these 5 areas, and are now analysing the data. I'd like to focus on findings from each of these five areas as the main sections in our report, but also code inductively within each of them to discuss the emergent patterns we've found. Any suggestions for an analysis approach that might suit? I've looked at thematic analysis, content analysis, and framework analysis but none of these seem to fit as we're beginning with a pre-existing framework then coding inductively within it. Thanks for your suggestions!

Hello, dear friends,

If we use thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data (e.g., interview transcription, observation note),

(1) Do we have to report the "intercoder reliability"?

(2) Is the "coding scheme" necessary to guide our coding process?

(3) How to ensure "adequate rigor" in conducting thematic analysis?

For the above questions, is there any literature to support?

Thank you very much!

What is the difference between content analysis and thematic analysis in qualitative research?

I was interested in exploring the perceived benefits of gardening in an urban setting, so I conducted interviews with gardeners. Subsequently, I employed thematic analysis to identify the main themes related to these perceived benefits. It was only after the emergence of these themes that I delved into various theories to aid in the interpretation and understanding of the results in the Discussion chapter.

My question is, should I discuss these theories in the Introduction chapter of the paper?

How can posters be analyzed in qualitative research? What is the best approach to analyzing posters, and is thematic analysis a suitable method for this type of analysis? Can you recommend any interesting literature on analyzing images and posters in qualitative research?

I'm new to thesis work and I am thoroughly confused. I understand what thematic analysis is. My professor put down " Results and Thematic analysis" in the table of contents. But it seems wrong. Is thematic analysis placed in methodology section? Isn't results AFTER thematic analysis? (inside methodology section). I can't find anything online that describes how or where to put thematic analysis in table of contents. Thanks

Hi all,

I am a student working towards gaining my nursing Master's degree. I am conducting qualitative research to explore the nursing Students’Experiences of Electronic Medical Records During Placements. My question is: Is it correct to use constructivist theory approach,interpretative phenomenology and thematic analysis for my methodology/approch/data analysis?

Thank you.

Hi, I'm working on a research proposal for a pilot study and struggling to land on the optimal sample size. The quant measures (physiological measures and surveys) are recorded while the participants are interacting in an online group discussion - 8 participants per group (conversation analysed with thematic analysis for context). The groups have the same composition (4x participants type A, 4x participants type B). For the qual part, it would be difficult to have more than 8 participants per group - and it is essential to the research question that qual and quant run concurrently.

I'm thinking of running two groups of 8 for the pilot phase - to get an idea correlation between physio and survey measures + wider context from the TA. I'm not finding literature to back this up (or suggest a different number of groups for the pilot phase). Thoughts are greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

When we code research of any kind (qualitative or quantitative) using thematic analysis, should we code every section of the research or just 'abstract' and 'findings' or just 'findings'?

Thanks in advanced for your permanent cooperation

I have the following facts:

I have semi-structured interviews as main source of data, I have already sepcific points to be researched (pre-existing code frame or similar) I need to analysis the empirical data to answer the research questions. My research based partially on discussing a theory and developing new aspects from it.

The correct qualitative method here is Thematic Analysis, ok which version?

Deductive? I think yes, could I use Inductive in one of the steps? Could I name it Abductiv and follow "Thompson"?

I aim to answer the questions using logical qualitative steps, what are you going to do if you have the same situation?

I collected the data using interviews and validated it using focus groups. I need to do a thematic analysis to analyse the data and answer the research questions. Should I proceed inductively or ductively? What is the name of the appropriate method, because interviewing cannot be repeated until saturation is reached

It is suggested that I use the intercoder verification in a research where I am the only coder, and whose objective is to verify the effect of the modification of the atmosphere of discussion on the topics discussed in a discussion group.

I believe it is useful to use test-retest to assess the reliability of my analyses (intracoder check), but I am not convinced of the relevance of using other coders to assess the codes assigned during my thematic analysis. If the objective of a research is to analyze the variations induced by the modification of a variable during almost similar discussion groups, using the same analyst, the same discussion plan and the same codebook, do you think it is necessary to check the agreement between coders?

ps.I work in a "codebook" or "template analysis" technique (as described in Braun and Clarke's (2022).

Through thematic analysis of online workshops, if one participant has made a comment/point that researchers deem it important, and is not part of a theme, but relates to the research question, can this be reported in the results section?

Thank you!

I have already achieved an thematic analysis, but now I need to adopt grounded theory as main framework of this theory to develop new theory.

Any hint, tips, or recommendation how to change my analysis to adhere grounded theory?

Pragmatism is the overarching theoretical lens I have used to conduct my mixed methods PhD research. I have used reflexive thematic analysis for the analysis of my qual data and felt critical realism would have been a good fit for how I want to analyse the data, however I have read much about the tendency for these two theories to be at odds. Is it possible for me to use both in my project?

I would like to ask when is it necessary to produce tables of frequency in thematic analysis process in qualitative research?

I do not want to analyze the text inside the book I just want to explore the existence of the main components.

Can you do one Thematic Analysis interpreting the data from 6 participants when one of the participants had different interview questions and five participants had the same interview questions?

When I applied thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data, I labeled plenty of initial codes, such as "meat", "beef", "fish", and "chicken". However, these codes are at different levels, so I'm not sure how to organize these initial codes. Should I retain all these initial codes and summarize a theme named "meat"? If so, there is a code and theme that have the same name: "meat". And how should I calculate the frequency of these codes?

The attachment is two examples and which one is correct?

Im writing begining to work on a piece of research that will ask about people's experince with psycedelic drugs and the steps taken to ensure positive exeprince/ minimise harm.

I want to conduct interviews asking questions about participants psycedelic experinces with an aim to find commonalities in thier experinces that could be used to inform safety protocols in the clinical use of psycedelics (psycedelic assisted therapy etc)

Because my research question focuses on peoples experince of a phenomena, i was assuming i needed to use IPA, but because i want to identify patterns across all (roughly five or so) participants whould it make more sense to use thematic analysis.

I've had a look at braun and clarke and to me that seems to indicate thematic analysis would be better suited

I am planning to use youtube comments with my students to train them in thematic analysis. If our pilot study goes well, we might use it to present a poster at the university's conference. However youtube comments have user id attached (some with real names) which made me think about confidentiality.

Hi all,

I am a student working towards gaining my integrated Master's degree (I have not conducted research prior to now). I am a novice to research so bear with me if my terminology isn't 100% accurate. I am conducting qualitative research to explore the experiences and perceptions of diagnostic radiography students in the communication of radiation risk. My question is: Is it correct to use interpretative phenomenology and thematic analysis for my methodology/approach/data analysis? I am conducting semi-structured qualitative interviews with 12 participants, so I hope this will be enough to reach data saturation. A follow-up question I have is whether it would be appropriate for me to use researcher reflexivity in this process as I am a diagnostic radiography student with my own preconceived opinions and experience on the phenomenon under study. Any help or direction for further readings would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Explaining with an example of previously done thematic analysis will be helpful

Is it necessary in thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006) in qualitative research to produce frequency tables of the codes?

Thanks

When I teach analysis of interviews or observations, I guide the students to formulate categories separated from each other. Reality is always more vague and overlapping, so the construction is sometimes artificial. My question is whether in qualitative research one should strive for the categories to be disconnected from each other?

I'll create a paper with the following RQs. What kind of mixed method is this?

RQ1. How do students perceive cheating? (survey; descriptive statistics; quanti)

RQ2. Why do students cheat? (Open-ended question; thematic analysis; quali)

I'm a newbie. Pls help. Thank you!

I will conduct stimulated recall interviews with graduate students after eye-tracking. The interviews will be prompted by each participant’s eye-gaze replay in Tobii Studio. The data I will collect from these interviews, can I analyze them using thematic analysis?

Hello everyone.

I have questions regarding comparing frequencies between groups. I will be happy if someone can help.

So I will describe first briefly my research design:

- I am analysing online shaming that has per se 10 types (10 types of shaming).

- I am analyzing 6 cases (multiple case studies) of shaming events.

- I am using thematic analysis.

- In the data (comments from social media) I am analyzing how many types of shaming occur in each data.

- In each case, I have obtained by thematic analyses how many times each type of shaming occurs (per se type 1 occurs 50x times in case 1, type 2 occurs 124 times in case 1 - type 1 occurs 12 times in case 2, type 2 occurs 32 times in case 2 etc).

- The 6 cases will be grouped into three groups by the theory, so I will have three groups (in one group there will be 2 cases, in the second group there will be another 2 cases and in the third group there will also be the other 2 cases).

- I want to compare the frequencies of types of shaming between these three groups.

So how do we compare frequencies/proportions between groups?

I must notion that the number of all codings was different in individual cases. For example in example 1 the number of encodings was - say 1,200, in example 2 the number of encodings was - say 800. A number of codings = number of all codings related to the types of shaming. So I can't just count these frequencies, but I have to weigh them. Does anyone have an idea how to compare the frequencies between different cases where the numerus are different?

Thank you so much for your help.

SHORT QUESTION: How to compare frequencies between groups where in each group there are different cases and each case has a different number of total codings (thematic analysis)?

How many coders are needed for Thematic Analysis: Pilot Qualitative Study?

My research aims to explore how the letter to stockholders is used as a strategic method of communication by organisations, and I wanted to conduct a thematic analysis of the letters to identify themes. I planned to search for themes within the letter and then link these to existing theory. I initially thought this would be inductive as the themes would be derived from the data, but if I link this to existing theory afterwards, does this change the approach? Would this oppose an interpretivist philosophical view?

I am conducting a honours project that is investigating ''How effective are the current domestic and family violence (DFV) crisis organisations in responding to the needs of PWD experiencing DFV (at home)?"

I am currently undertaking a literature review as part of my undergraduate dissertation in which I am synthesising the results from 5 qualitative studies. I was thinking of using either thematic synthesis or narrative synthesis.

What is the difference between thematic synthesis (Thomas and Harden 2008) and thematic analysis? I presumed at first that thematic analysis was only for primary data collection methods, however within narrative synthesis (Popay et al 2006) they state to use thematic analysis if synthesising qualitative data in step 2: 'developing a preliminary synthesis of findings of included studies'.

So, really the question is can I use thematic analysis for a literature review, within the process of narrative synthesis? They don't specify which guidance to use regarding thematic analysis (whether that is Braun and Clarke or another author), so I am a bit stuck. I have found a simplified approach to thematic analysis by Aveyard (2014) in 'Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide' which I would use within narrative synthesis if this is appropriate.

What are everyone's thoughts on this? Advice would be greatly appreciated. Which is more suitable for an undergraduate dissertation: narrative or thematic synthesis?

Hello,

I am doing a qualitative research with semi structured interviews, N=10 and the method of analysis is thematic analysis. However, I see that my themes do not answer or correspond to the research questions. The approach that I followed in analysis is inductive.

Thank you.

Our team become interested in telemedicine/telehealth because of its great potential during and postpandemic. However, we would like to seek your suggestions on the specific area of research. Also, most of the team members are inclined to doing qualitative evidence synthesis.

Hi,

I am looking to analyse my survey responses (N=16) responses.

They are not heavily detailed and are in response to a total of (N=3) open ended question. The questions were asked to a set of professionals. It is a small scale study.

I originally thought of thematic analysis.

However, I don't think TA would be an appropriate method as I am worried the dataset may be too small. Are there any other types of methods/coding analysis I could use?

Thank you in advance

I would like to use a Thematic analysis for a qualitative data

Hi,

I am looking to analyse my survey responses (N=16) responses.

They are not heavily detailed and are in response to a total of (N=3) open ended question. The questions were asked to a set of professionals. It is a small scale study.

However, I wondered if TA would be an appropriate method? I am worried the dataset may be too small. Are there any other types of methods/coding analysis I could use?

Thank you in advance

Hello everyone. I have question about obtaining data from Internet.

In my research I will analyze comments from websites and social media platforms. And I am searching for applications/apps/technologies other tools to download comments from Internet to my computer.

Do you know any tools/apps to download comments for free?

There is around 10.000 comments and if I would copy/paste one by one it would take me a lot of time. I want to obtain data quickly.

Do you have any suggestions for me?

Thank you so much for help.

Regards, Nejc

Hello everyone,

I am working on my qualifying exam. I want to employ qualitative Delphi study to elicit educators opinion on

what engineering concepts should be included in K-12 education. For the qualitative analyses, instead of using thematic analysis, is it appropriate to use grounded theory because my overarching aim is to develop a conceptual framework which shed light on the aspects of engineering. My research question: What nature aspects of engineering are considered to be important for K-12 science education by science and engineering educators? Thanks.

We have been working on a report that would present the current state of clinical ethics consultation/support services in Turkey. As a part of the study, we interviewed ethicists, ethics committee members, and administrators informally to understand their views regarding the subject matter. The interviews are not fully structured although we have a list of questions at hand. By the end of the project, we expect to have talked to 10-12 people. In the interviews we have made so far, we have seen that some people agreed to meet face to face and gave detailed answers to the questions we asked, while some others sent their answers in written form and kept it quite short.

We believe that every information shared with us is valuable, as the practices regarding clinical ethics consultation/support are very limited in Turkey. However, we are confused about how the raw data from those key informants should be presented in an organized manner. How/by what method should we analyze the data in total? Or should we?

Thank you in advance.

I am doing qualitative research for my DBA thesis, it is based on multiple cases from same industry and I am willing to do thematic analysis for it. Further to that I have three models in my conceptual framework which I am using in the study. one of my friends has suggested me to either take one model and use multiple cases or to use multiple models and one case to conduct thematic analysis. however, my previous supervisor did not mentioned to me anything like that and I have change of supervisor now and she is confused the way I am conducting my research. I would like some help if someone can explain to me that if I can do thematic analysis for multiple cases by using three models complementing each other in conceptual framework.

thanks

I have 27 interviews for a psychology research paper with 4 people involved in the project and willing to code using Thematic Analysis. Is it better to use a software programme to do that or to just do it manually ? I would be grateful for anyone else's experience with these programmes. In particular the budget is small so expense may make a difference. Finally does it take long to work out how to use them? Those involved are clinicians and may not have done research in some time.

I am conducting a single-case study research as part of my dissertation for a Master's degree. The topic is in the area of public procurement and innovation. The aim is to explore to what extent standards referenced in public procurement allow innovation in State-Owned Enterprises (in a one country).