Science topic
Technology Studies - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Technology Studies, and find Technology Studies experts.
Questions related to Technology Studies
The concept of modernity as a matter of matter, by encompassing the intrinsic nature of materiality, exposes how modernity is deeply embedded in the material conditions of existence. While the explicit development of a theory framing modernity as a matter of matter may not exist in a unified manner, interdisciplinary approaches and specific fields of study provide insights into the material dimensions of modernity.
Conceiving Modernity as MATTER STATES matters because it allows ideas from various disciplines to create a comprehensive framework that addresses the materiality inherent in different phases of modernity.
- Material Culture Studies: Material culture studies investigate the ways in which objects, artifacts, and material practices shape and reflect cultural, social, and historical contexts. While not explicitly framed as a theory of modernity, this field acknowledges the materiality of culture and its evolution over time.
- Marxist and Critical Theory: Marxist and critical theorists, such as Karl Marx and his followers, have explored the relationship between material conditions, economic structures, and social change. The materialist conception of history emphasizes the role of material forces in shaping societal development, including the transition to modern forms of capitalism.
- Environmental Humanities: The environmental humanities examine the intersections between human cultures and the natural environment. Discussions on the Anthropocene, a proposed epoch marked by human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems, highlight the material consequences of modern industrialization and consumption.
- Postmodern and Poststructuralist Thought: Some postmodern and poststructuralist thinkers, like Michel Foucault, have examined the ways in which discourses, institutions, and power structures shape and are shaped by material practices. While not explicitly framing modernity as a matter of matter, these perspectives emphasize the materiality of social constructs.
- Media Studies and Technology Studies: Media and technology studies investigate the materiality of communication technologies and their impact on society. This includes discussions on how technological advancements shape the material conditions of human experience in different phases of modernity.
- Philosophical Perspectives on Materialism: Certain philosophical perspectives on materialism, such as dialectical materialism, explore the relationship between material conditions and historical development. While not confined to discussions of modernity, these theories provide a broader context for understanding the material basis of societal change.
I want to inquire about projects regarding this field. I assumed such an interdisciplinary field exists and has a name, just like there are also science and technology studies, security studies, design studies, mobility studies, discard studies, etc. I thought it could be "reading studies" but the results I received searching that name in Scopus left me unsure.
Actually, I, ve got into trouble with two areas "sociology of science and technology" and "science and technology studies" (STS). I can not catch their real differences between the two fields? I was even more surprised when I couldn't find any book or any Journal with the exact title "sociology of science and technology" while I was searching Amazon and SJR databases. Furthermore, it turned to me that there are high overlaps between their syllabuses. I will be very grateful to anyone who helps me in this case.
Thanks
hi
we are a team from amirkabir university of technology studying biomedical engineering. we are working on a economical ventilator device for covid_19 patients. please share your ideas for helping us on this way.
thank you
My research project draws on scholarship in environmental anthropology and STS that is influenced by developments in speculative realism. Specifically, my PhD investigates aesthetics of agriculture science in everyday lives of agriculture scientists, extension professionals, farmers, and peasant labor involved with apple trees in Western Himalayas. I was motivated by Timothy Morton’s articulation of aesthetics In Hyperobjects. Within Science and Technology Studies (STS) identifying aesthetics can linger somewhere between attention to care within existing and emergent ecological, techno-scientific assemblages and attention to design/discourse. To me, aesthetics capture affective sense of both situated within everyday labor. Aesthetics can represent both - different worlds and scattered, dispersed acts of worlding in them. I feel drawn towards the concept, but I need more clarity.
How would you suggest that I clearly conceptualise methodological attention to workplace aesthetics (which to me would be orchards, nurseries, laboratories, agriculture universities, corporate and department boardrooms, trainings and demonstrations)? What resources should I draw on?
Urban planning studies are increasingly drawing on the science and technology studies (STS) to examine the relationship among technological artifacts, social practices, and agency. How the STS approaches can contribute to retrofit research and practice?
I am studying the inclination of companies to associate a new trademark (TM) with the commercialization of radical innovations.
Do you know examples of companies that decided to apply (or not apply) for a TM to commercialize a radical innovation (eg., a new product)?
I am asking this because, on the one hand, firms may improve appropriability over the radical product thanks to the TM. But, on the other hand, a firm may have an existing TM, so choosing to use it to commercialize the product since that brand is already known among customers while the product is distant from their existing values. What do you think about?
Bruno Latour between other scholars of ANT theory has been cited on Social Science and Technology Studies, around the thesis: "Connaissance applicable non appliqué" -CANA- . Are there in Latinoamerican context some examples against CANA thesis?
There was no sampling work. The survey is on usage of info systems in the healthcare industry in a country.
