Science topics: BiologyHistologyStaining
Science method

Staining - Science method

Explore the latest questions and answers in Staining, and find Staining experts.
Questions related to Staining
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
5 answers
We are isolating hepatocytes from mouse liver and trying to culture them in 6 or 24 well plates. The isolation is carried out according to the protocol and plating is done using William E medium with 10% FBS and 1% PEST. We use to coat the plates with collagen 1mg/ml. But after 3 hours and more the cells are loosely attached to the plates. We are sure these cells are hepatocytes because we stained them with the appropriate markers. Maybe something is missing in the medium which is essential for attachment?
Relevant answer
Answer
Giulio Preta Have you managed to solve the problem? Mine look similar...
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I have prepared an oil in water nano emulsion and would like to visualise it for confocal microscopy, however i dont have any fluorescent compounds in my emulsion. I know that nile red is a lipophillic dye and would like to know how to stain (protocol with concentrations) it so that i can visualise the droplet morphology better using confocal/fluorescence microscopy?
Relevant answer
Answer
This technique will suit you with some modifications.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I work at the departement of pathology, EM-lab and we are on the look out for a replacement/update for the old Pyramitome 11800 we still use.
The one we have now is quite old, but the working angle is perfect for searching for glomeruli in Epon-embedded kidney-tissue. We have not found a replacement, and are wondering if anyone knows of one.
We have the Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome, but the working angle is not ideal for the purpose of searching for glomeruli. We would have to "randomly" trim and stain to see if we have glom, which would take too much time and is too uncertain.
The added picture is the type we have.
Would appreciate any advice and tips.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you, that´s a great tip. We will look into that. Sad that there´s no replacement, it´s the ideal way for us to work.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I am working with blood and A549 cancer cell. My experiment design is where I will stain the cancer cells with CellTracker CMTPX, and also stain the blood (lysed blood sample with a few residual RBC) with hoechst separately and then spike the stained blood sample with the stained cancer cells.
There are no issues with the dye used for cancer cell but the hoechst always stains the cancer cells a dull blue as well after I spike the blood with cancer cells. I have tried to wash the stained blood cells 5 times in PBS to prevent this stain contamination but it keeps happening. Is there any way to prevent this?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think the stained blood sample has residual Hoescht and then since Hoechst is cell-permeable the cancer cells stain with residual Hoechst. A few follow-up questions to help.
What is the concentration you are using?
What is the purpose of staining with Hoechst? If it is just to stain the DNA (does not matter if it is dead or alive), then I do not see an issue with the blue color.
Hoechst is cell-permeable. If you are using it on live cells, you would want to use something else that is not permeable without fixation or if the cell is dead, such as Propodium Iodine (PI). What color is your CellTracker? Make sure that the PI and CellTracker excitations do not overlap.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Hi,
I am looking for a viability marker to stain alive white blood cells and still working after fixation.
Here is my workflow for you to better understand (and tell me if my asumptions are wrong).
1) I am studying white blood cells from total blood (EDTA tube).
The next step must be perfurm in the hour after the sampling.
2) I take a certain volume of blood and had a buffer with fixative agent during 8 min (blood is diluted in 1:1).
3) Then, I make the blood go through a filter to stick fixed cells on it.
4) Finally, I stain the filter with May-Grünwald Giemsa - MGG (resulting in colors from pink to blue with purple) to see the nucleus, cytoplasm et identify my cells under microscope (brightfield).
My idea is to be sure that my cells I identify by MGG were well alive before the 8min fixation.
--> So, I would love to have a viability markers that I could identify in brightfield (so more a dye?), in different colors other than pink/blue/purple and that is not toxic for cells (no apoptosis or death process). If you have an idea.. let me know please :)!
I have made some research and here I found :
  • metabolic stainer such as XTT could have worked but it need an incubation of 2h at 37°C which I can not dot.
  • I found the neutral red but I am not sure if incubation needs to be 1h too or not? if there anyone who has experienced neutral red to stain alive human cells?
  • trypan blue : I have read that it could go through all the cells if time is not short and I am not sure it is still working on fixed cells. I also read it is toxic for cells (but how long?) We could think of 2 min of incubation with trypan blue before the 8min fixation but I do not know if it is a good idea as I can not have a washing step between blue trypan andfixation (so I suppose all my cells will be trypan blue because of the fixation that can make small cells go into the cells?) and also because of the toxicity.. if someone have already test this?
  • finally, I could try fluorescent dye (blue, Cy2 or Cy5). I though about DAPI at low concentration, 5 min before the 8minfixation. But I means I have to use a microscope with both brightfield and fluo which means the identification of cells will take more time. But If I have not the choice..
Thank you for you returns! :)
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Amanda, I want to stain viable cells without incubating cells at 37°C so I think Alamar Blue would not be the solution ?
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I am manually counting neurons in specific brain regions with bright-field stainings and I was wondering if anyone has a way to automate this? I am using the software Aperio ImageScope now, but am open to other suggestions! Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
you can try to use QuPath (Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Scientific Reports (2017)).
It works in some cases.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
I'm getting a problem with my hydrogels. As I wash my sections more rigorously, more hydrogel will wash away. However, the more you wash the slides, the more ECM and cells wash away as well.  
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, I found this thread just now, I am facing an Issue with putting hydrogel micro beads on a glass slide for atomic force microscope , if anyone amongst you can give some advice
I did try to use gelatin coated slides, but when I drop suspension onto the slide, micro beads in the droplet swim around. Is there anyway I can keep them stationary?
I did try to dry the sample a bit but if effects the beads too. Bead size is in the range of 40-70 um.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Dyes for live-dead bacteria staining
Relevant answer
Answer
yes, based on the information I found, there are several dyes that can be used to distinguish between live and dead cells without affecting their motility. Here are some of the main options:
These kits and dyes are specifically designed for cell viability testing, aiming to minimize the impact on live cells while effectively distinguishing between live and dead cells. When selecting dyes that meet your experimental needs, please consider your specific application and experimental conditions.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Hi guys, I have some ceramide and dihydroceramide (d18:0/14:0) dissolved in methanol : chloroform=1 : 1. I tried to run TLC for both of them and stain the plate with Iodine and potassium permanganate. The band for ceramide is very clear but the band for dihydroceramide is always invisible. For the amount I used 10 micromoles for both of them.
I wonder is there something wrong with my sample or it's that the dihydroceramide is really hard to stain. If it's the staining problem, is there a better way to stain it? Most of paper I read used LC-MS or radioactive labelled dihydroceramide in TLC to detect it.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Weiqi Gu, the link below gives a whole protocol and different staining reagents. My Regards
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Hi, I'm a master's student in biotechnology and I'm having trouble visualizing plasmid bands during extraction. I'm working with the plasmid pET-32a in *E. coli* DH5α. I've tried both kit-based and manual extraction methods, but I can't see any plasmid bands. I've run the electrophoresis at 90 volts for 40 to 45 minutes (1% agarose gel) using Safe stain for staining. After using the kit extraction method, the Nanodrop showed a concentration of 162 ng/µL. The DNA ladder shows clear and distinct bands, but the plasmid does not. Does anyone have suggestions on what might be going wrong or how to improve the visualization of plasmid bands?
Relevant answer
Answer
From the gel picture it seems very clear that you have no plasmid DNA. There are two possibilities here, the first is that there is no plasmid in your prep and the second would be that the DNA went away during digestions. If you load some undigested plasmid on a gel to see if there is anything there that would tell you the which it is. Given that there is no visible RNA or sheared DNA, I think it most likely that there is nothing in your plasmid prep.
Nanodrop only tells you that something is absorbing, not that it is any good. If you had DNA or RNA that was all degraded it would still give you a high Nanodrop reading. Also chemical contaminants do the same.
The question to ask the person who ran the machine is what the curve looked like, is it a nice curve with a peak at 260 or did she just give you the 260nm reading?
But the bottom line is that a gel picture is more accurate than the nano drop.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hello, I am trying to study synapses and try to stain synaptophysin and synapsin on postmoterm rat brain tissue. But so far have completely no siangls under confocal (I am expecting to see punctas).
Rat brain tissue is kept in 4% paraformaldehyde for over 3 years.
My protocols invoves 10% serum for preblock and 1% serum for antibody incubation. PH7.4 PBS buffer washes between steps and 1 night first andtibody and 1 night second. Dilution factor range from 1:200-500 for primary and 1:200 for secondary. I tried antibodies from Milipore and Fisher as how other paper used them.
I also tried staining PV for positive control and I see perfect singals (so the tissue should be fine).
Do you have any suggestions where the problem should be? or any suggestions of change s in antibodies use or protocol changes?
Relevant answer
Answer
It could be the case especially this antibody does not recognice the synaptophysin eptopes after 3 years PFA fixation. if you are using paraffin section antigene retrievel is highly recommended. For frozen sectoins I recommend a dilution medium which contains not ony normal serum you should add Troton X 100 in a concentration between 0,2 and 0,5 %.
Don't use green fluophores (Cy2 or alexa 488) because of the long lasting fixation the unspecific background staing increases, especially in the green chanel. This could be one reason why you don't see anything, because the background has swallowed your signal.
It could be possible that your detection system is not sensitiv enough. Instead of labeld secondaries use biotinylated secondaries and detect them with labeled Steptavidin. If this is not enaough you can try to improve your results with tyramide signal amplification systems. Or you try a new antibody. I have given you a link to Synaptic Systems. This company offers alot of different synaptophsine antibodies. Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I just started staining slides for IF and have been seeing some cloudiness form when I prepare slides using thawed WBCs from Bone marrow samples. When I use fresh (not previously frozen) samples, I don't see this weird fogginess. I was wondering if anyone else has run into this issue before?
I've included pictures of a fresh stain versus a thawed stain here.
Relevant answer
Answer
Indeed, I think it will have something to do with the formation of ice crystals.
Not really, I tried longer fixation steps, but this did not seem to make a difference ...
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Can I substitute SSC buffer for PBS in propidium iodide procedure for staining of cells? Also, can I PI stain cells without fixing them, or is that not an option?
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I have a question concerning the CellTracker Red fluorescence dye. Lately, our cells are dying when stained with CTR and then live imaged (we do timelapses over several hours, imaging ever 10-30 minutes). All the controls (stained, but not imaged and vice versa) seem fine, so it is (so far) just the combination of staining and prolonged imaging which kills the cells. As a final working concentration, the cells recieve 11 µM CTR for 45 min at 37 °C.
We are thinking of testing another dye to see if the fault lies with the imaging itself but that has not arrived yet.
Does anyone have any experience working with CTR and come across similar problems? Any suggestions would be welcome!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi. I'm with Thermo Fisher Tech Support. I've also used that dye and other CellTracker dyes when I was in R&D here.
11uM is probably a fine concentration, but 45 minutes seems like a long label time to me. Overlabeling (either too high a concentration and/or too long label time) can lead to toxicity effects. Your labeled, but unimaged, control looks fine, but remember that when you are imaging labeled samples, photobleaching occurs, particularly if you image over a long time, which creates free radicals and singlet oxygen that leads to increased cell toxicity. Some cell lines are more sensitive to others. Another thing to note is the binding mechanism. This dye has a chloromethyl functional group that binds to free thiols on proteins, particularly glutathione, in the cytoplasm. This, too, can lead to effects on cell functionality.
So here are some things to try:
1) reduce your label time and/or concentration, as long as your initial intensity is still sufficient for imaging.
2) reduce photobleaching effects by reducing your light exposure and compensating by increased gain or exposure time settings, reduce the frequency of imaging, or using ProLong Live (a live-cell antifade solution we sell).
3) Try a different dye. We have other colors of CellTrackers. Contact tech support (cellanalysis.support@thermofisher.com) and we can help you choose one and offer a free goodwill replacement with it if you ordered within the past year. Feel free to mention my name. They'll need the catalog and lot number, order date, and any order numbers for your CellTracker Red. Since you are in Germany, our European tech support team will need to process it for you.
Cheers, Jason
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
5 answers
I have red blood cell coated with recombinant antibody. This antibody has 6X his-tag. we want to perform immunocytochemistry on RBCs. Which stain can we use?
Relevant answer
Answer
We have produced anti-A scFv against blood type A antigen A (trisaccharide) from E. coli. We have 6X his-tag at C-terminal. We have primary anti-His antibody and secondary HRP conjugated.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I am trying to evaluate the cytotoxicity of my effector cells against an adherent target cell line. I plated 10,000 target cells and incubated them overnight to allow them to attach. I then stained them with 15uM calcein AM in complete medium and incubated the cells for 45 min at 37C. I washed three times with complete medium, then added my effector cells at a 1:1 ratio. I had a negative control (target cells alone) and a positive control (target cells with lysis buffer). I had two separate plates - after 4 and 24 hours, I transferred the supernatant to a black opaque 96 well plate, and added lysis buffer to lyse any effector cells that might've uptaken calcein. I have calcein AM blue, so read at 360/449 nm. When I read the signal, I saw very high background signal in my negative control wells, and did not see much difference between my experimental wells and positive control. Could this be due to insufficient washes? Or is there something else contributing to such high noise?
Relevant answer
Answer
Why not consider using fluorescence microscopy to observe what's happening with your cells? You can also include specific death staining, such as EtBr for the red channel, or a variety of death reagents available on the market. This approach would allow you to quantify changes relatively easily in the images. For the plate reader approach, I’d recommend switching the wavelength to match Calcein Green AM 488/535 nm. Additionally, have you tested for potential autofluorescence in your media or plate? This can sometimes interfere with imaging and quantification, so confirming it could help clarify your results.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I want to stain my bacterial cells to highlight the nucleus on the surface where my protein is attached. I have tried using Hoechst, but the signal in flow cytometry was too weak, resulting in a low cell gate. Is there a better dye or an alternative technique to achieve this visualization?
Relevant answer
Answer
Bacterial cells do not have a nucleus; therefore, Hoechst or DAPI is less localized and produces weaker signals than eucaryotic cells. I would recommend SYTO9 for your flow experiment counterstaining. If you want to label the bacterial cell membrane for high resolution/high magnification confocal microscopy, fluorescent Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), lectin conjugate will allow you to reliably visualize the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I am trying to determine apoptosis in mouse liver tissues using the Elabscience TUNEL In Situ Apoptosis Kit (HRP-DAB Method) (Catalog no. E-CK-A331). In my first experiment, I was able to identify apoptosis in the tissues and get the ideal staining. Even though I did not change anything in the protocol, the next day, on my second try, I was unable to get staining in the tissues. What do you think could be the reason for this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear İremnur Sarıalioğlu
As you know the TUNEL In Situ Apoptosis Kit (HRP-DAB Method) are very sensitive to detect apoptosis in a single cell. Therefore, one has to be very careful while performing the assay and make sure that you adhere company manual protocol to get the desired results.
As said, you got a good apoptosis signal in the first experiment and now its is not coming to your expectations. I am sure that something went wrong either with your protocol, exposure time, washing and HRP-DAB which is light sensitive. Hence, I suggest you to double check and run one small assay by using positive as well as as negative controls samples only and check whether apoptotic signal appears??.
I suggest you to recall whether the kits components were not kept at RT for longer time or if any mixing of components by using same tips may cause serious issue. Other factors like samples over-fixing, concentration of TdT enzyme, prolonged reaction time may also affect apoptotic signal.
Make sure that:
1. The washing is sufficient, otherwise it will
affect the enzyme activity (such as DNase I and TdT
Enzyme) subsequent experimental operations.
2. After washing the slides with PBS, please carefully blot the liquid around
the sample areas with blotting paper.
4. Keep the sample moist during the experiment to prevent the
failure of the experiment caused by dry slides.
5. Avoid repeated freezing and thawing of the Labeling
Solution and TdT enzyme. Stirring by vortex is not
recommended.
Best
Shail
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I’m losing my cell-embedded hydrogel discs during the washes needed for staining, which is causing me to lose my entire cell samples for imaging assays.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated please!
Relevant answer
Answer
Can you please share with us which hydrogel formulation and staining protol are you using? Also, for how long do you culture your cells within the disks?
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Hi every one, this is my first time doing luxol fast blue. My sections are mouse spinal cord-PFA 4% fixated-frozen-cryo-sectioned at 20 um. after 16 hours of LFB in 60 degree, I did not see any strong staining. After first differentiation, I look at them under microscope and they were weak and it was reverse( gray matter was blue and white matter was more clear)- I differentiated them second time and it was all gone.
What are your thoughts?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Zohreh Estaki , would you mind to add - as an important information - the source / reference / dye specification(s) of your staining sequence ? also guessing about the fixation: "Immersion-" or perfusion fixation of the spinal cord?
Thank you in advance, regards, W.H.M.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
7 answers
I am trying to stain spinal cord after cryo-sectioning.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi every one, this is my first time doing luxol fast blue. My sections are mouse spinal cord-PFA 4% fixated-frozen-cryo-sectioned at 20 um. after 16 hours of LFB in 60 degree, I did not see any strong staining. After first differentiation, I look at them under microscope and they were weak and it was reverse( gray matter was blue and white matter was more clear)- I differentiated them second time and it was all gone.
What are your thoughts?
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
I fabricated microbeads using hydrogel (20-50 micrometres) to mimic human cells' size and mechanical properties; I want to stain them to be able to recognize them under an optical microscope. Which staining should I use? I don't have confocal microscopy at the moment, so I think fluorescence inks will not be helpful here; I am using the microscopic camera to view those beads
Relevant answer
Answer
Try gram staining of microorganisms and you can also distinguish them buy once.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Staining - Microbiology
Relevant answer
Answer
Jeffrey P Cheng Thank you very much
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I am recently observing DAB staining fail-regions (red circles or red arrows on pictures) on my DAB stained slides. Does anyone have ideas why I am getting this?
I can see only hematoxylin stained cells even in DAB positive area. But sometimes both DAB and hexatoxylin stainings were not stained in the fail-regions.
I used Leica BOND RX automated machine plus DAB staining kit for the DAB staining.
I baked the slides at 65 °C for 3 hours, so I don't think the fail-regions are because of not melted paraffin.
Moreover, the fail-regions are not seemed bubbles, because the shape is different from that of typical round bubbles(blue arrows in DAB-fail 3).
Does anyone experienced like this result? or has seen or solved the issue?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, could I ask how you are imaging these slides? I am doing the DAB staining but i never get this dark brown color, despite using the nickel. Are you just using the brightfield microscope?
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
We have been trying to optimize IHC. We are using citrate buffer ph:6 for antigen retrieval in microwave oven for 20-30 minutes. Giving 1 hour incubation for primary antibody and 40 minutes for secondary antibody. But we are unable to get results. Hematoxylin staining is working fine but DAB is not going inside cells giving these brown spots. Attached are the images of recent try.
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, how are you imaging your cells? Is it brightfield. For me the counterstain doesnt work after DAB for some reason.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I am encountering a significant issue in my experiments with U87 cell spheroids, using DiOC18 (D275) staining for fluorescence. Initially, the results seemed promising, as the expected green fluorescence was observed. However, upon analyzing the samples using the red filter, I noticed red spots within the spheroids, which likely indicate DiOC18 aggregation. This makes it impossible to proceed with propidium iodide (PI) staining, as these aggregates could result in false positives. The DiOC18 was dissolved in DMSO and left under agitation overnight. The stock solution was prepared at 2 mg/mL, and the working solution was adjusted to 20 µg/mL.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your response.
Upon closer examination, red aggregates can be observed within the spheroids. At higher magnification, these aggregates appear to be crystals, likely representing agglomerates of DIOC. In contrast, cells that were not stained with DIOC do not display these crystalline structures.
I am considering whether using a lower concentration, such as 1.0 mg/mL, might reduce the likelihood of aggregate formation by minimizing crystal development.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
I want to treat fibroblasts with 24h MG132 and then look a the amount of cell death. However, I want to correct for the amount of cells in total, because they also prolfirate in 24hour.
My supervisor suggested that after 24hour I stain my cells with HOECHTS and PI and then quantify with imageJ. The amount of dead cells can be calculated with:
x amount of HOECHTS positive cells/ x amount of PI positive cells.
However, HOECHTS also stains apoptotic cells. I do not know if this will interfere with my results. Do you think that after 24 hours most apoptotic cells are aleady dead anyway (or at least a part, normalizing the results)?
Or is this an unreliable method?
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
I'd like to use the confocal to track spermatogenesis in various coral colonies  over the season without having to do too much histology.  But, I'm not sure if this is possible with the confocal/fluorescent dyes.  Side bonus... corals and their symbionts auto-fluoresce green/red respectively.  So, looking for something in the blue (400-450 nm) and yellow (565-600 nm).  If it's possible for one to target spermatogenesis and the other to track oogenesis, then that's just lovely.
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Good morning,
I am working on rats and currently testing some coordinates for NMDA lesion. Usually for NMDA lesion we wait approx a week and we perfuse with PFA 4% before vibratome cutting and a simple Thionine staining (or NeuN but here I do not need that). Because we want to win some time and also because we want to use the cryostat, I was wondering if it will be possible to visualize properly the NMDA lesion on fresh tissue and also if with the damage it's not too risky to not perfuse the tissue before freezing and cutting it. I've already done coordinate pilots with indian ink and Neutral red staining on fresh tissue cutted with cryostat but NMDA is the next step.
If anyone have already done that or has a reasoned opinion, I will really appreciate.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you for your answer. Taking into account your opinion and that of my PI, at the end we perfused 1% PFA our 2 brains (and not PFA 4%, to obtain enough flexible brain to be cut with cryostat) - however, the lesion being quite medial and ventral, the tissue of one of our brains (the one with the biggest lesion) was litteraly destroyed by the anti-roll blade, I had to finish without using it. Then, since my sucess rate is 50%, I'm still not sure that the cryostat is the best cutting method for NMDA-lesioned tissue.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
We culture cells on a microchip with a membrane that has autofluorescence and after few hours the stained cells start fading I am searching for a cell tracker dye with strong intensity to make it easy to track cells in this high noise background. 
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I took some blood from a B6 mouse that was hit with tumor cells and did a Richter's Giemsa staining. This is the first time I did Richter's Giemsa staining, and I couldn't identify the cells in it for sure. Is there anyone who could help me with this or tell me the possible problems with my staining results
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I want to visualize the bacterial colonies grown inside a closed system made of transparent polymer. For this, I am planning to use inverted fluorescent microscope. Please suggest what magnification will be best 40X or 100X? Also, kindly share the fluorescent dyes to be used to stain bacterial membranes?
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
My lab received some mice heads that have been (and still are) in PFA for more than 2 years. What do I have to do to be able to extract the brains? And is it possible to freeze this tissue and use it for immunochemistry stainings?
Relevant answer
Answer
There are a lot of unknowns here... but specifically 2years in PFA the brains are well fixed, and antigens are most definitely cross-linked, which will require a minimum of a quality antigen retrieval step. The other question should be addressed prior to starting; were these animals just decapitated and immersion fixed in PFA, or did the previous group perfuse them with a saline/PBS flush followed by PFA? IF they didn't do this it is probably not worth the following efforts because anything you get will be compromised by the presents of blood in the tissues. IF they did the perfusions removing all the blood, you may want to try to carefully extract the brains from the calavera and begin a cryo-protection protocol (sucrose and eventually a Glycerin/Glycol solution). This is a critical step; you can't just freeze the extracted brains without cryoprotection. After which you will be able to section for frozen IHC. At this point you still have questions... depending on your target antigens you are severely limited due to their age in PFA. In other words, there are many pitfalls with this attempt and your outcomes will vary greatly depending on a number of unknown variables. Good luck.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Hey. I have a couple of methyl green stained tissues but the staining was not very good and I'd like to de-stain and try h&e. I've seen a couple of H&E de-staining protocols and I'm not quite sure if they are useful in this case. Do you know any methyl green de-staining protocol?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Methyl green is a commonly used stain in histology, and while it is generally quite stable and binds strongly to DNA and proteins, it can be removed with the appropriate chemicals. Here is a general protocol for destaining methyl green from a slide:
Materials Needed:
  • Xylene or a xylene substitute (e.g., Clear-X, cedarwood oil)
  • 100% Ethanol
  • 95% Ethanol
  • Distilled water
  • Coplin jar or a container large enough to hold the slides
  • Slide warmer or water bath (optional)
Protocol:
  1. Xylene Treatment:Place the stained slides in a Coplin jar or a container. Cover the slides with xylene. The amount should be enough to completely submerge the slides. Let the slides sit in the xylene for about 5-10 minutes. You may gently agitate the jar to help with the destaining process. Be cautious when handling xylene as it is flammable and toxic. If the stain is not removed after 10 minutes, you can leave the slides in xylene for a longer period, but monitor them to prevent over-dehydration which could damage the tissue.
  2. Ethanol Washes:After destaining with xylene, transfer the slides through a series of ethanol washes to remove the xylene and any remaining stain. Start with a wash in 100% ethanol for a few minutes. Follow this with a wash in 95% ethanol. Finally, rinse the slides with distilled water.
  3. Rehydration:After the ethanol washes, place the slides in distilled water for a few minutes to rehydrate the tissue.
  4. Checking the Destaining:Remove a slide from the water and gently blot it dry with a paper towel or let it air dry. Check under the microscope to see if the methyl green has been adequately removed. If not, you may need to repeat the xylene and ethanol washes.
  5. H&E Staining:Once the methyl green is completely removed, proceed with your Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining protocol.
Safety Precautions:
  • Work in a well-ventilated area or under a fume hood when using xylene.
  • Wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves and safety goggles.
  • Dispose of xylene and ethanol properly according to your institution’s safety guidelines.
Remember that some tissues may be more delicate than others, and over-destaining can lead to tissue damage. Always monitor the process and be prepared to stop if the tissue starts to show signs of damage.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
9 answers
Dear all,
I'm putting together an antibody panel to characterise airway epithelium.
I've tried two different p63 antibodies which show mostly unexpected cytoplasmic staining. I would expect 15-30% of epithelial cells to be positive with nuclear staining.
Has anyone else come across cytoplasmic staining in airway epithelium?
Details as follows:
FFPE section of lung tissue. Antigen retrieval done on Leica Bond Rx, blocked in BSA with Dk serum, Triton X-100 and Tween 20.
C1 (blue): DAPI
C2 (green): Ms x p63 (ab735, 1:100)
C3 (red): Rb x p63 (ab124762,1:200)
C4: merge
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
It seems like you're using a different antibody to those that I've been using. My fixation times were 10 minutes, my cultures are only a few cell layers thick, so they don't require a long fixation time!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone, I am currently working on Nile Red staining and fluorescence microscopy to confirm the presence of PHB in microalgae. Both lipids and PHB in microalgae can be stained by Nile Red, how can I distinguish between them? Additionally, what methods can be used to remove Nile Red staining from lipids?
Relevant answer
Answer
you can use the Fluorescence Emission Spectra technique, as both PhB and lipids show peaks at different wavelengths. Following reads may be helpful:
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
Hi guys. I was wondering if you guys have any suggestions on staining live cells for long time (ideally at least 5 hours)? I want to at least define where the cell boundary is, and hopefully it should be a red dye so it will have less crosstalk with my another green dye. I have tried several dyes but none of them satisfies me:
  1. Plasma membrane dye like CellMask and DiD: these dyes can visualize membrane well but just cannot retain too long (up to 1 hour for DiD and 4 hours for cellmask). They will be internalized into cells and can barely be seen on the membrane.
  2. SYTO 61 and 62. These dyes are for staining nucleic acid, but are actually good for seeing membrane cause it will also stain cytoplasm. The bad thing is that they make my cells super bright on green fluorescence due to unknown reason (probably cell stress) and just cannot be used for my purpose.
  3. SiR actin for staining the F-actin of cells. These are great in background and won't be internalized fast like PM dyes. However, my cells are probably not fully covered by F-actin and there are always space that is not stained by SiR actin but clearly is a part of cells.
I am running out of ideas now. The only option left is expressing fluorescent proteins tagged to other membrane proteins. CellBrite steady looks like another great choice since it is expected to retain signal at the PM for more than 24 hours. It might work but just could take too much time. Would appreciate it if anyone have experience on this topic ;)
Relevant answer
Answer
I would suggest CellTracker in the version CellTracker™ Red CMTPX if it should be a dye or if you would like to stain only the membranes you might want to try CellLight™ Plasma Membrane-RFP, BacMam 2.0 both from Thermo Fisher. I have used the later with different tags and it worked great for me.
The CellTrackers are really good, the CMAC, CMFDA and CMTPX are all great and should last for days.
Best wishes
Soenke
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
5 answers
Until I create my strains with a GFP-tagged protein of interest, I've been doing immunofluorescence on yeast to look at this protein of interest examine its location.
After primary incubation, washes, secondary incubation, and more washes I subject the yeast to 10uL of DAPI at 1:1000 for 5 minutes at RT. Then, I wash 2 x 5 minutes with PBST (0.1% Triton-X 100).
Sometimes the DAPI staining produces a halo-like effect in addition to regular nuclear staining. There also seems to be a lot of cytoplasmic staining in some cells. I do not believe the nucleus was compromised. Does anyone know the cause of this?
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
when I use SYBR Green II nucleic acid gel stain (1:10000 in TBE buffer) with mIRNA, why fluorescence decrease with increasing the concentration of mIRNA? I tried many times but same. I select the excitation is 579 nm and emission is 500-600 nm.
Relevant answer
Answer
Clearly since the nucleic acid gel stain is a buffer that has the capacity with the ration 1:10000, therefore when it will increase its concentration therefore the fluorescence will also decrease 10000 times.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I'm currently working on immunofluorescence staining experiments, and I've noticed a consistent issue. Regardless of the primary antibody I'm using, I always observe higher background staining in the epidermis compared to the dermis.
I'm careful with my blocking steps and have tried different blocking agents, but the problem persists. Has anyone else experienced similar issues, or does anyone have insights into why the epidermis might show higher background staining? Any suggestions on how to reduce this would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, Zahraa,
I am wondering which type of skin you work on. Is it human or mouse skin? I have done a lot of skin including pig, human and mouse skin for immunofluorescent staining. The skin from pig and mouse usually have no background in dermis and epidermis, but I usually see a lot background in human skin. I don't know the reason but it seems relative to blood remain in the skin, thickness of sections and hard to de-wax in human skin. you may try to remove the blood before fixation to reduce the background. in mouse skin, if you see a lot background in epidermis, it usually come from the secondary antibody. you may try to change the secondary antibody.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
When I run this protocol, after passing the stains, the sample looks fine, but the stain off during dehydration and mounting. I do 3 stations in absolute alcohol and place in xylene. I have been following this protocol for years, but recently this problem has occurred.
Relevant answer
Answer
This is not really one of my best images. I ended up discarding the slides with bad coloring. This shade of blue is from the camera I used to take the picture; the camera temperature is really low, so I wouldn't use a photo like this. In any case, I can see this discoloration with my eye under the microscope too, and I've seen it under several microscopes. The tissue that should be red is almost transparent in some regions; in this case, the connective tissue was stained better than I reported on other slides.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I would like to stain live bacteria with plasmids encoding fluorescent-labelled proteins. I bought, for instance, one plasmid encoding a blue fluorescent protein (https://www.addgene.org/14891/). I got the bacteria, but when I put them under a fluorescent microscope, I saw no signal at all.
A I missing something? Do these kinds of plasmids need to be activated? (I understood they were constitutive). Are there better plasmids for the job?
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I am staining cells for a nuclear gene regulatory protein (red in attached image) which should only exist in the nucleus. I expect to see the gene regulatory protein forming condensates within the nucleus. Instead, I am seeing a ring of stain around the nucleus. Is DAPI interfering with my stain for the nuclear protein? Cells were permeabilized. So why am I seeing this ring?
Relevant answer
Answer
I doubt that DAPI interferes with the staining of the nuclear protein, but you may perform a staining experiment without DAPI to see if the pattern changes.
Maybe you need to optimize permeabilization and/or fixation; try different permeabilization agents or conditions to ensure uniform access to the nucleus; and/or different fixation times and methods.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Hi, I performed western blotting for the 8 times. In two of them I used wet-transfer and the rest of them assayed with semi-dry transfer. I checked my buffers, systems, gels and everything. I used two different primary antibodies which one of them is surely working. In the first 5 assay, I observed signal from the antibody that we know it is working. after we took images, I stained the membrane and observed protein bands on it. but now I can not observe any signal neither of them. and there is any protein bands on membrane. what could go wrong?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you do not detect any protein on your membrane after the staining procedure (I guess for your experiment, using ponceau S), it is most probably the transfer issue you are facing...Putting aside the antibody verification, if there is not any protein on your blot but you have them on your gel after SDS-PAGE, this must be investigated during the transfer process. How about your ladder, can you see them on your PVDF membrane? Your PVDF membrane conditioning (pre-wetted with MeOH) protocol has been performed properly?... Applied voltages and transfer protocols are valid and buffers are prepared fresh?... Do you observe this in both semi and wet-transfer platforms?
After blotting has been completed, you may check the gel again and put a secondary PVDF membrane during transfer to see if any protein either passes through the membrane or remains in the gel...This will clarify if this is a transfer issue...
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I‘ve been using an unconjugated mouse anit rat anitbody to stain stem cells. The antibodies are scarce so unconjugated format is the onyl one we could obtain. we used a secondary antibody FITC. For controls I used an isotype fitc mouse Ig1.
I determined the positive cell populations from the isotype control.
However, was it necessary to add a secondary antibody(FITC) only control to determine the positive cell populations?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Adamska Mr
To optimize your staining, both the primary and secondary antibodies should be titrated to ensure minimum background with a maximal specific signal. Fluorescently labeled secondary antibody only control should be used when indirect staining is performed. This control is important for determining whether there is any non-specific binding from the secondary antibody.
To make sense of your data and to draw accurate conclusions, it is important to include proper controls. The below attached link will provide you with more information on flow cytometry controls.
Best.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hi! I was staining my tissue with both PI and Calcein AM dyes, but I realize a lot of cells were stained by both PI (red) and Calcein AM (green), for example, the cell at the center of the attached image. I thought PI stained for dying cells while Calcein AM stained for live cells.. so I am curious to know if those cells are actually dying or alive (or both...??).
Also, some of the red signal was really blurry.. could it because those cells at the late stage of dying already (DNA was fragmented and released into interstitial space?)?
Thank you in advance!!
Relevant answer
Answer
Calcein AM is a non-fluorescent cell-permeable derivate of Calcein that is widely used in cell viability measurement. The carboxylic acid groups on Calcein are modified with AM (acetomethoxy) groups, which endows Calcein AM with high hydrophobicity, facilitating its penetration through cell membrane. Once inside the cell, AM groups are hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases. The fluorescent Calcein molecule is restored, which is trapped in the cell and emits strong green fluorescence.
Since dead cells lack esterase activity, only live cells are labeled and detected. The fluorescence intensity will be proportional to esterase activity. Calcein-AM has been proved to be both specific and sensitive for detection and tracking of apoptosis in living cells. The preservation of membrane integrity is one of the most significant features of apoptosis with respect to necrosis. In the presence of membrane defects, Calcein leaks out of the cell and the signal also vanishes in the presence of residual esterase activity.
On the other hand, Propidium iodide (PI) which is a red-fluorescent nuclear stain is not permeant to live cells or cells which are dead but still have an intact membrane (such as the primary apoptotic cells). In late apoptotic and necrotic cells, the integrity of the plasma and nuclear membranes decreases, allowing PI to pass through the membranes, intercalate into nucleic acids, and display red fluorescence.
Calcein generated from esterase in viable cells emits a strong green fluorescence with an excitation and emission maximum at 494nm and 517nm, respectively, while PI once bound to DNA has a maximum emission wavelength at 617nm when excited at 535nm.
There is something that must have gone wrong with your reagent or your process. You may have cells that are either alive or dead, but not both. Cells which are dead but still have an intact membrane (like the primary apoptotic cells), PI is not permeant to these cells.
You may repeat the experiment. Initially, observe the cells in bright field. Then observe the cells in the green fluorescence channel. The live cells will be stained by green, fluorescent Calcein. Follow it by observing the cells in the red fluorescence channel. The dead cells will be stained by the red fluorescent, PI. Then finally you merge the image of green and red channels.
Good Luck!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Dear colleagues, help me determine what kind of artifact this could be? After fixation in 10% formalin, dehydration with ethanol, paraffinization and routine staining with hematoxylin and eosin (Mayer's hematoxylin). I find that in some sections of rat liver, black nucleus, dots (from 3 to 30 pieces) are found. This does not look like the images of formalin pigment, hemochromatosis or other pathologies that I managed to find. I will be grateful for any help!
Relevant answer
Answer
A guess based on "H&E Staining Overview: A Guide to Best Practices":
This section was allowed to partially dry before coverslipping. This has caused tiny air bubbles to be trapped over some nuclei making them appear black (sometimes referred to as “corn-flaking”).
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I need assistance quantifying migrated PBMCs using a transwell assay. PBMCs (50 000 cells in 50 µl) were seeded in the upper chamber of a Corning HTS Transwell 96-well permeable support plate (insert pore size 8 µm) in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium with GlutaMAX. The lower chamber contained medium supplemented with or without the chemoattractant, 10% FBS, and the plate was incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the non-migrated cells were removed from the upper chamber. The migrated cells that adhered to the underside of the inserts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 0.2% Crystal Violet for 10 minutes, and rinsed with distilled water. The stained PBMCs were imaged to assess the number of cells that migrated through the inserts. Since PBMCs are semi-adherent, the non-adherent cells migrated to the bottom of the wells, where images were also taken for quantification. While I can manually count the Crystal Violet-stained adherent cells in ImageJ using the cell counter, counting the non-adherent cells will be more challenging due to their more concentrated distribution at the edges of the wells (see image), especially in the chemoattractant group where more migration is expected. Any assistance on how to quantify this in a quick and easy way would be greatly appreciated! Please note that some cells do adhere to the bottom of the wells, making it time-consuming to harvest each well of a 96-well plate and count the cell suspension using a Countess. I have also tried Crystal Violet staining in the bottom wells to measure the absorbance with a plate reader, but the results are inconsistent, as some cells are washed away during the process.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Claudia,
The results with the plate reader might be inconsistent due to the meniscus effect and uneven cell distribution.
In my opinion the simplest and fastest way to count the cells would be a Hoechst33342 staining (works even with life cell for a kinetic approach) or stain them with DAPI after fixing.
You might want to check if that gives you better results (if you have a plate reader that can read fluorescence)
Or you could use an inverted fluorescent microscope with a long distance lens with an appropriate field of view (10x or 5x) and ideally with an motorized stage to acquire mosaics of your well. first the lower compartment and then next the lower side of your insert.
Than you can bring everything into imageJ/Fiji (ideally as a stack) and count the nuclei with the particle counter after setting a threshold for your nuclei. If clumping is a problem try a water shed algorithm.
Best wishes Soenke
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
We do peripheral blood chromosome analysis, in the last month we could not get G band, at the same time we got bands on chromosomes that stained for C band. I do not know if the increase of humidity was the main reason. But I will write the protocol to recommend me change some details that may help to get the G-bands again.
Preparation
- 0.075 g of trypsin powder dissolved in 100 ml of PBS, then heated in a water bath 56-58C.
- 85ml of D.water + 5 ml KH2PO4 + 5ml Na2HPO4 + 5ml Geimsa stain. pH =6.9
Start Staining
- Slides inseted in trypsin Jar at 56-58 C. for 40 seconds.
- Washing slides quickly in cold PBS for less than 1 second.
- Slides inserted in Giemsa jar for 3 min and 30 Sec.
- Twice wash quickly in D.water.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, did you succeed in getting bands for the same? We are facing the same problem.
We follow this protocol: 0.25% trypsin diluted with PBS at room temperature, incubated for 30s. Then washed in chilled PBS two times and then added to Giemsa (Giemsa powder: 0.38 g, Glycerin: 25 ml, Methanol: 25 ml ,Working Solution:Dilute 0.67ml of giemsa stock solution in 30 ml of dH2O. Store at room temperature) containing coplin jar for 50 mins. After which washed in running tap water and dried and then viewed under microscope.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
In order to view/ find the laid thrip eggs is there any methods is available, if yes, suggest me the methods.
Relevant answer
Answer
A method used for staining leafhopper eggs (Backus, E.A.; Hunter,W.B.; Arne, C.N. Technique for staining leafhopper salivary sheaths and eggs within unsectioned plant tissue. J. Econ. Entomol. 1988, 81, 1819–1823) can be modified to stain and count eggs embedded in leaf discs by female thrips. Leaf discs can be immersed in a glass vial containing 2 mL of McBride’s (McBryde, M.C. A method of demonstrating rust hyphae and haustoria in unsectioned leaf tissue. Am. J. Bot. 1936, 23, 686–688) staining solution (95% ethanol and glacial acetic acid (1:1, v/v) with 0.2% acid fuchsin). Glass vials to be placed on a plate shaker at low speed for 8 h at room temperature for proper staining of eggs. Then, leaf discs can be transferred to clean vials containing a de-staining solution (lactic acid/glycerol/water (1:1:1, v/v)). Clean vials containing the de-staining solution and leaf discs were transferred into an incubator at 80 OC for 72 h. The leaf discs can be carefully washed with running water to remove the de-staining solution and examined under light microscope.
All the best for your progress on thrips egg studies. Please keep updating your progress.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
4 answers
I performed H&E staining on epididymal white adipose tissue, but after the staining, the tissue disappeared. I also processed a liver sample as a standard, and the liver sample was fine after staining. What could be the problem with the WAT samples?
Relevant answer
Answer
what is the timing of deparaffinization and rehydration? are you using the same time duration as other tissues?
I think that you have to reduce the deparaffinization and rehydration time because the WAT are susceptible to xylene and ethanol.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hi there! I'm hoping to to look at co-localisation of cytokines and markers of different brain cell types (e.g., neurons, astrocytes, microglia) in juvenile rat brains (postnatal day 28) that have been embedded in paraffin. Ideally, I would like to be able to image co-localisation, and also to analyse the morphology of glial cells that show co-localisation with cytokines.
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the effects of different tissue slice thicknesses on the effectiveness of immunolabelling and morphological analysis. Most of the studies that do double/triple staining with paraffin-embedded tissue seem to use 3-5 micrometers, but the studies that perform morphometry (and only stain for 1 marker) seem to use thicker slices, e.g., 20-40 micrometers. Are thicker slices of paraffin-embedded tissue harder to stain for multiple markers?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, for immunolabelling, I always use a 5 microns. Increasing the section thickness causes me to use more antibody, which is not ideal. I have read papers about conventional histochemistry techniques that use about thicknesses of 20, 40 and even more, but I do not use and have never tested these thicknesses. I usually 7 microns as limit. Greater thickness can make it difficult for the reagent penetration in tissue, which takes more time for stained, depending on the composition of tissue, overstaining can occur. I perform morphological and morphometric analysis in both techniques without hardness to thicknesses 7 and 5 microns .
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
Hi, I need to make some counting of blue SABGAL stained senescence cells. All cells will be fixed and stained T75 flask, then trypsinization, making some cell suspensions and counting with Cellaca PLX. Is it possible to do something like this? If yes, what kind of dye and assay should be used?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Park! Never used this dye, I will try. Thank you for this idea.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I am looking to stain live Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using DAPI (Thermo cat # 62248) but have currently been unsuccessful. Does anyone have a protocol to stain these cells without having to fix them using either DAPI or Hoechst, I want to be able to visualize the nucleus in live cell? Also does it matter if you use DAPI or Hoechst, is one better than the other?
Relevant answer
Answer
May consider using Permai fluorescence dye.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
5 answers
Hello!!
I am doing histopathological analysis of kidney sections with PAS stain. I want to quantify the staining intensity of the sections. can anyone explain what is the correct protocol for using the color deconvolution tool in ImageJ software?
Thanks in advance,
Sreyasi!
Relevant answer
Answer
I am having the same issue and I think this paper would help you!
DOi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9586
If you have reached another solution, please tell us!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I recently performed counterstaining with Mayer’s hematoxylin on mouse left ventricle sections. However, I observed dark spots, particularly in the infarct zone. Before proceeding with DAB staining, which might be compromised by these spots, could you please advise on how to address this issue effectively? And any advice to reduce the background of Hematoxylin statining
Relevant answer
Answer
Regarding these black spots, we generally exclude from several aspects: First, is the Mayer’s hematoxylin fresh and clean? You can choose to filter it with filter paper. Second, is there any contamination in the tissue?  It can be verified by re-sectioning. Third, rinse with running water to remove some exogenous impurities. Some personal suggestions, I hope they are helpful to you.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I am staining some brain sections stored in cryoprotectant that express a Histone H2B- GFP fusion protein that were generated ~10 years ago. I know I need to enhance signal with an anti-GFP antibody, but do I need any specialised H2B-GFP specific primary antibody? Or will anti-GFP do the trick?
Sections are free-floating 30um stored in cryoprotectant, initially fixed in PFA.
Relevant answer
Answer
Sönke Weinert thank you so much for your help, it is greatly appreciated!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
I have primary breast cells embedded in the hydrogel. When stained with EpCAM without the hydrogel, the staining was correctly localized to the membrane as expected! However, after embedding in hydrogel and using the same protocol for immunofluorescent, we are now seeing nuclear staining. Have you encountered this issue? Any recommendations on how to resolve it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you sure that this is an artefact? If the antibody epitope is on the intracellular domain it may be genuine signal.
This paper talks about its translocation:
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hi all, I was just wondering if anyone has experience with multiplexing a mouse monoclonal primary and a rat primary. I'm trying to multiplex by incubating them in the same well but was told by a colleague to research the literature and find out if anyone has multiplexed with the same mouse monoclonal ab that we're buying and a rat primary. Their concern was background staining due to the species being alike (their secondaries could bind to the wrong primaries). We're using a mouse-on-mouse blocking reagent from vector. Does anyone have any experience with this or any recommendations? Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You'll want highly cross-adsorbed secondaries. Invitrogen (Thermo, or whoever they are now) sell these. They are more expensive but they are for this exact purpose. Using mouse as an example, the highly cross-adsorbed are pre cross-adsorbed against bovine IgG, goat IgG, rabbit IgG, rat IgG, human IgG, and human serum to prevent cross reactivity.
The blocking may need to be optimised as mouse-on-mouse might not work as well as a blocking reagent for other species (but adding some BSA or FBS to the blocking mixture may help). As far as the secondaries go though, highly cross-adsorbed antibodies work quite well.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
We tried both Kryo and Paraffin Embedding before cutting, and in both we had issues with autofluorescence in our COL1 scaffolds. Is it possible to avoid counterstainings/autofluorescence within the process of preparation of stainings (especially IHC with COL2,ACAN,DAPI) , and do you use some software/certain fluorescence markers to avoid this? Thank you for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Collagen is weakly fluorescent at lower wavelengths and in the UV. If you have collagen matrices this fluorescence can be fairly significant, especially if you are using a widefield microscope. The easiest way to avoid this is to pick probes that fluoresce at longer wavelengths. Use something like TO-PRO-3 instead of DAPI, and for antibodies use fluorophores like Alexa 565. If you need 3 fluorophores and have a limited range of excitation wavelengths. Whatever channel you expect will be the brightest should be stained with a 488 fluorophore. If there is a large enough gap between background intensity and staining intensity you can subtract out the background without also removing the staining you are interested in.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
5 answers
Hi,
I'm in a lab for 2 and a half years where we work on mouse tumors.
We have a protocol running for 7 years of tumor dissociation, staining, and facsing. We are using the cytoflex lx 5 lasers.
In the last 4 months, we have an issue that around 90% of the time we cant get a cd8a signal on facs.
We have no idea why- nothing changed, we're working with the same reagents from the same companies, we even tried opening a new vial of everything in order to make sure. Nothing changed.
When we can't get a cd8 signal, we're not getting it on any fluorophore.
On the time that it does work, the same protocol is applied.
Any ideas? Anyone had this issue in the past and solved it?
Thanks all!
Relevant answer
Answer
So, here's an update if someone's interested - we discovered that our liberase TL was the issue. Maybe they changed the formula, we have no idea. We changed the enzyme mix and now it's based on DNAse and collagenase IV and works well. I appreciate your answers!
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hello everyone,
I am currently using washed human platelets to stain Annexin V as a procoagulant marker. Additionally, I am staining with PerCP-CD61 to identify platelet cells. So far, I have tried using heat treatment (boiling in water for 20 minutes) and Triton to disrupt the cell membrane. Does anyone have other suggestions for the preparation of Annexin V positive control?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Lucille,
For inducing cell death/apoptosis, I have put cells that are in a 1.5ml tube into a microwave-heated boiling water for 5min and put it back on ice for 2min, and repeat for 3 cycles, and I get ~80% annexin V + cells. This is done with mouse lymph node cells, and I am not sure if your image showed the staining for platelets in all conditions, but you don't need platelets to be your positive control for Annexin V staining.
Another way of inducing apoptosis specifically is to use a drug called staurosporine (1285, Tocris) and you can check this paper ( ) for how they did it in cell culture in vitro.
Hope this is helpful,
Zhixin
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
3 answers
I want to know if there is any low cost method to identify an exopolysaccharide produced by bacteria is cellulose or other polymer.
Relevant answer
Answer
Several dyes can be used to stain bacterial cellulose for microscopic analysis or other purposes. Some common dyes include:
### 1. **Calcofluor White**
- **Type**: Fluorescent dye
- **Function**: Binds to β-glucan structures, including cellulose
- **Usage**: Widely used for staining cellulose due to its strong fluorescence under UV light, making it easy to visualize bacterial cellulose in fluorescence microscopy.
### 2. **Congo Red**
- **Type**: Non-fluorescent dye
- **Function**: Binds to cellulose and other polysaccharides
- **Usage**: Often used for staining cellulose in bacterial colonies on agar plates, where cellulose-producing colonies will appear red.
### 3. **Direct Red 23 (Sirius Red)**
- **Type**: Anionic dye
- **Function**: Binds to β-glucan structures
- **Usage**: Used for staining cellulose in histological sections, providing a clear contrast against the background.
### 4. **Acridine Orange**
- **Type**: Fluorescent dye
- **Function**: Can stain both nucleic acids and polysaccharides, but with different emission spectra
- **Usage**: Useful for dual-staining protocols where cellulose and nucleic acids need to be differentiated.
### 5. **Safranin O**
- **Type**: Cationic dye
- **Function**: Stains cellulose and other components
- **Usage**: Often used in combination with other stains in differential staining protocols.
### Staining Procedure with Calcofluor White (Example):
1. **Sample Preparation**: Fix the bacterial cellulose sample on a microscope slide.
2. **Staining**: Apply a few drops of Calcofluor White solution onto the sample.
3. **Incubation**: Let the dye sit on the sample for a few minutes to ensure adequate binding.
4. **Rinsing**: Gently rinse the slide with water to remove excess dye.
5. **Microscopy**: Observe the stained sample under a fluorescence microscope with the appropriate filters for UV excitation.
### General Tips:
- **Fixation**: Ensure proper fixation of the bacterial cellulose to the slide to prevent loss of material during staining and rinsing.
- **Controls**: Include controls to distinguish between specific and non-specific staining.
- **Fluorescence Microscopy**: Use appropriate filters and settings for fluorescent dyes to achieve optimal visualization.
The choice of dye depends on the specific requirements of your experiment, such as the need for fluorescence, the type of microscopy available, and the level of detail required.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
Hi guys If anyone is currently working on aging cells, you guys would like to give me some advice. I'm testing against biomarker (SA-beta-Gal), I encountered a false positive in the control group and the senescence induced group had a worse stain. I have raised many questions about it staining endogenous lysosomes, also changing pH, osmolarity (fixative time)... I have tried all kinds of methods and followed the protocol as well but my results are not feasible..
Thanks a lot.
Relevant answer
Answer
Good question. I had a similar experience with a fluorescence-based beta-gal assay. I have not followed up yet.
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
1 answer
The organism used in the biofilm inhibition assay is Staphylococcus aureus. While performing the experiment in microtitre plate, I used 200 microlitres of (1:100 dilution of culture broth with absorbance 0.5). The incubation time was 24 hours. I could not observe biofilm formation at all even in the growth control when stained with crystal violet. Help me with suggestions as to how to improve the conditions for biofilm formation? Does increasing incubation time or using specialized broth help in biofilm formation by this bacteria?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Staining
Question
2 answers
I am doing an IHC protocol on a testes FFPE tissue slide. For primary Ab I am using Anti-Geminin antibody [EPR14637] from Abcam. For secondary conjugate I am using HRP. For chromogen I am using DAB. I am not co-staining the slides because I just want to look at geminin expression. The geminin ab is new and works well, same with HRP. I am following the general IHC protocol but at the end of the dehydration step and after mounting the slides, I am not seeing any staining develop. It's so weird, because I can see the reaction happening and the tissue getting darker with stain after washing and dehydrating them, the staining just vanishes.
Can anyone please help me with this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Sharanya,
It's actually unusual that the staining vanishes during dehydration. DAB is insoluble to water, alcohol and xylene. May be the colouring you might have noticed is not the specific. It would suggest you to first do a western blotting so as to confirm the expression of the protein of your interest. In case you get the band then you shall proceed with a trouble shooting.
  • asked a question related to Staining