Software Programming - Science topic

Yet another uncredited reprint from ChatGPT. I could go through this list item by item and summarize all its weaknesses. But serious researchers will compare the programs themselves and make up their own minds.

GAP (Group theory, algebras, and representation theory)

Sage (algebra, combinatorics, graph theory number theory and lots more)

Dear Abdulhameed Qahtan Abbood Al-Tai ,

The modified weak Galerkin method does not require the penalty parameter by comparing with traditional DG methods.

Regards,

Shafagat

Dear Abdulhameed Qahtan Abbood Al-Tai ,

The modified weak Galerkin method does not require the penalty parameter by comparing with traditional DG methods.

Regards,

Shafagat

Dear Geoffrey Khaminwa Mulama , I find this article very contributing one.

Deaf scientists who use American Sign Language (ASL) need to be able to communicate specialized concepts with ease. Because deaf individuals — here we use ‘deaf’ broadly to refer to the full kaleidoscope of deaf experiences — have historically been under-represented in science, the linguistic capabilities of ASL have yet to be fully explored for scientific discourse. As a consequence, deaf scientists may not have the necessary tools to effectively articulate their work. Nowadays, with improved educational opportunities and communication access, there are more deaf ASL users who are experts in scientific fields. Through their scientific work, these researchers finally have opportunities to expand ASL by incorporating new technical signs and experimenting with best practices for communication. In this Viewpoint, four deaf scientists — a quantum physicist, a marine ecologist, an immunologist and an organic chemist — discuss their experiences in developing scientific lexicons and the resulting shift in their science communication...

Yes, few commonly used methods:

1. Known Object Size: If there is a known object of a fixed size in the camera trap image, such as a ruler or a reference object, you can use its size as a reference to estimate the distance of the animal. By comparing the known size of the object with its size in the image, you can calculate the animal's distance using principles of perspective and geometry.

2. Stereo Vision: Stereo vision involves using multiple cameras to capture images from slightly different perspectives. By analyzing the disparity between corresponding points in the two images, it is possible to calculate the depth information and estimate the distance of objects in the scene, including animals.

3. Photogrammetry: Photogrammetry is a technique that uses multiple images of the same object taken from different angles to reconstruct its 3D structure. By analyzing the parallax between different views of the animal in the camera trap images, you can obtain depth information and estimate the distance.

4. Machine Learning: With advancements in computer vision and machine learning, it is possible to train models to estimate the distance of animals directly from camera trap images. By training a model on a dataset containing images of animals at known distances, the model can learn to predict the distance based on visual cues in the images, such as size, perspective, and texture.

It's always recommended to combine multiple approaches and validate the results against ground truth data whenever possible.

Good luck

Partial credit AI tools

Dear Sindia Trujillo ,

It is the interface.

Regards,

Shafagat

No, Rana Hamza Shakil a three-category variable requires only two dummies -- just as a two-category variable requires only one dummy. The regression intercept will represent the score for the "omitted" category (i.e., 0 on all the other dummies) and each of the remaining dummies will give the difference between that variable and the omitted category.

Entering three dummies for a three-category variables calls for a degree of freedom that you don't have. Neither SPSS nor R can handle this, but I do not know how they report this error.

Here you can find the website for LEVM/LEVMW.

library("illuminaHumanv4.db")

probeID=c("ILMN_1690170", "ILMN_2410826", "ILMN_1675640", "ILMN_1801246", "ILMN_1658247", "ILMN_1740938", "ILMN_1657871", "ILMN_1769520", "ILMN_1778401") data.frame(Gene=unlist(mget(x = probeID,envir = illuminaHumanv4SYMBOL)))

OpendTect but also Paleoscan do that.

I do prefer the latter for many reasons.

MAXQDA offers a 30-day free download version

Dear Jenell Black ,

If it is only about the coverage of green it should be fairly easy. By splitting the RGB channels and quantify the area afer thresholding the green image.

If you have multispectral images it might be easier to differentiate different species.

If you have RGB images with different tones of green you might want to think about colour deconvoltion so seperate different tones.

If you share example images I would take the time to see if the problem could be solved in ImageJ/Fiji.

If you have hundreds of images to quantify you should skip ImageJ and try the CellProfiler.

Kind regards

Soenke

Narayana Ruthwek Mamillapalli , I don't know exactly what parameters you are using for the "gel" captures, but I will try to help as best I can. An important thing to consider at the beginning of the edit is to adjust the color temperature of the light point used. It is specified in the manufacturer's manual. What software do you use or plan to use?

Matlab works well for "engineering" types of problems. However, Matlab often requires a specialized add on "toolbox." The base price of Matlab is pretty expensive and the add on toolboxes are expensive.

For general purpose work, Wolfram Research Mathematica will address more general problems than Matlab in that it has the computational elements and symbolic manipulation support.

The upside of both Matlab and Mathematica is they both have very good debugger support built into the package. Both Matlab and Mathematica are "free format" programming languages. There is a Mathematica called MATLink that allows Matlab functions and functionality to be used within Mathematica. It provides the best of both worlds.

As others pointed out Python can be used. The downsides for me for Python is the lack of a high quality debugger as one has in both Matlab and Mathematica and it is a fixed format language. That is the column in which one starts a line is important. The formatting is quite rigid. For those of us that are old enough to remember the fixed format languages such as Fortran II and IV, the benefits of a free format language are obvious. For those that need to trace the values of a variable though a complex algorithm, a robust debugger is important. Unless a lot as changed the debugger in Python levels a lot to be desired. The biggest upside of Python is it is open source and "free."

A GNU open source Matlab equivalent is Cctave. It is designed to be a drop in replacement for Matlab. However, the editor is not as sophisticated nor as robust as Matlab and neither is the debugger. On the other hand you get 85% of the capability and it is free. Code developed in Octave will run in Matlab and visa versa.

Yes, R is free. A lot of websides for help.

For Graphics, see:

https://r-graphics.org/

Upper continental Crust values (for sediment)

With 27 interviews, you are definitely in the range where using software will help you, especially when it comes time to search through your codes.

In terms of which software to use, all of the major programs can do thematic analysis equally well, including ATLAS.ti, Dedoose, MAXQDA, and NVivo. To make a choice, I recommend looking at their tutorial videos and choosing the one that gives you the best introduction for what you want to do.

IntErO model for calculation of soil erosion intensity and runoff

Dear colleague/s,

(to Ibrahim, but open to some other interested colleagues)

I am kindly inviting you to have a look at the application of my IntErO model for the calculation of soil erosion intensity and runoff (link):

IntErO model

www.geasci.org/IntErO.

- Free download of the software;

- Simple installation;

- Examples of applications available on the same web page (but also on RG and on www.geasci.org/Publications);

- I, as an author, am available to demonstrate how it is working.

Finally, in case you decide to compare the results received with using the IntErO with some other model/s and or measurements, I will try to arrange to finance the publication of the paper having in a team of authors two of us from my team,

Sincerely,

Velibor Spalevic

Mob/Viber/WhatsApp: +38267201222

E-mail: velibor.spalevic@gmail.com

SAP2000 has two types: Student version and professional version. The latter is better as it has considerable capacities and it is adaptable for the design and calculations of great structures.

Other software such as AutoCAD 3D, FLAC 3D, ANSYS, ABAQUS, HecRas and so on, can be used. It should be noted that any software has its peculiarities. The selection depends on what you want to achieve witch accuracy! Sometimes, you can use 2 software to compare the precision level of the results!

Kien Vu thank you.

The answer depends strongly on the structures you are interested in. If we talk about layer stacks where you can safely assume quasi-infinitness in the directions perpendicular to the stack direction I use CODE (https://wtheiss.com/wordpress/?cat=2 ). If you want freeware, RefFIT would be an alternative (https://reffit.ch/ ). Both can solve inverse problems. If the layers are structured and periodic, you could use numerical methods like Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) or Finite Element Method modelling (FEM) or Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis (RCWA). It depends somewhat on your problem at hand, but I usually use FDTD for such problems, but they are limited to direct problems. Can you tell us the concrete problem you are trying to solve?

Hi Johann,

This must have been very frustrating for you. The best way will be to do manual coding. Take each transcript, read it slowly, sentence by sentence, and identify the main idea in each sentence. Assign labels to the ideas, these become your category labels. The bales can be taken from the text (Nvivo codes), or from previous research (theoretical code). For each paragraph, identify the core issue being talked about by the participant. Do this throughout the transcript. Read the transcript again, this time around try to see if some of the category labels can be grouped into a single main idea as a theme, based on the purpose of your research. Make short notes on the printed transcript reflecting on the participant's experience, meanings, interpretations, and questioning your own assumptions. If you are working on word documents, use the review and comment functions to make notes and reflective remarks along the way, as you code the transcripts. You may have to read and code one transcript several times. Keep all the codes (category and theme labels) you make and the page and line numbers of the text that these labels can be found in the transcript. Repeat these processes for each transcript. Collect all your labels and their indexing details. Work with the labels and be open to making changes by reorganizing, recategorizing, and renaming them as you immerse yourself in the data.

Manual coding may be slow, but it's the best way to code and analyze data. It gets you to read and understand each transcript or data material.

I hope this helps. Good luck with your analysis

Good afternoon

You have a few tutorial in youtube

Best regards

Maybe this answer can help

For the Qualitative software you can use:

1. NVIVO (In app license)

2. Vosview (Free)

3. Publish and Perish (Free, note: need integration to your scopus ID)

For Quantitative:

1. SPSS (In app licence)

2. Smart PLS (Free for student, limitation dataset, for unlimited dataset using professional license)

Thank You

Hi Johann Pieterse

According to some of my personal experience, there are some recommendations for your reference

A1; Zoom or Skype is all ok.

A2: GoogleTranslator or others

A3: Audition (Adobe Inc.)

A4: Speech-to-Text on Word (if Office365 is applicable)

A5: do not know.

Kind Regards

Zhouxuan Xiao

Hi,

Maybe these tools will suit you.

Regards,

Anna

Hi Urgessa,

I recomendo Reading the attached articule.

Good luck!

Dear John Samuel

The following software is capable to make simulations for the Direct energy deposition (DED) process :

1. Autodesk Netfabb (Ultimate version), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4WM6eSdPlo

2. Flow 3D software, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x4PbMGhJEE

3. Simufact additive (2020 version), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb_rUsaIcNM&feature=emb_logo

Hi Friend

see below

I think this is not supported by the scientific community. Basically, the software might be used for language and grammatical correction but every part of your manuscript should not be copied from somewhere. Therefore, the best option that we have developed as an experience is that rephrase the sentences by yourself.

Thank you!

See some online tools described as 10 Free Plagiarism Checker Tool for Thesis:

spss

Dear Patrick,

our company uses different devices for scanning purposes, like video cameras, line or field scanners. Besides that, we develop our own algorithms or use existing ones to do fault detection and perform measurements of various kinds. But to figure out, if we could be of any help, we need to know more about your problem. Have you any samples available?

For annotation you may use Geneious, as proposed by others. In some cases, MITOS can also do a decent job http://mitos2.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py, but in both cases you have to check the results manually.

For comparative mitogenomic and phylogenetic analyses, you may try PhyloSuite, as it was designed to handle mitogenomic data: https://dongzhang0725.github.io/

Good job, colleagues

It's all good

I agree with David L. Morgan. You have mentioned videotaped data in your title. I would add that I know that ATLAS.ti, NVivo, MAXQDA, and multimodal analysis video (http://multimodal-analysis.com/products/multimodal-analysis-video/index.html) support video analysis. They offer trials and, maybe, you can finish your project in this limited amount of time. I would suggest that it is better to think if you can benefit from one of these licenses in the future, so the cost would not be perceived as high.

ANSYS HFSS: 3D Electromagnetic Field Simulator for RF and Wireless Design, SIMULIA/CST Studio Suite® and Altair Feko™ are best for designing microstrip antennas.

Top 6 Data Analytics Tools in 2019

Looker

Klipfolio

Tableau

Lumify

Sisense

I you get results you can publish here http://www.emergingtechnet.org/SDE2020/

Most of international publishers and journals use iThenticate for assessing for text overlap. Turnitin is commonly used in for student assignments.

Your question for software, could be the so-called "smiling curve" applied to the software value chain? , does not correspond with my field of specialization narrow for marketing management .

Hi.,

Nexus Earth is an innovative open source blockchain technology, designed to better ... The Nexus Wallet is a secure desktop wallet for the NXS cryptocurrency, Learn everything about NXS coin, before you invest in Nexus. Understand what is Nexus how to buy NXS coin and the future of Nexus cryptocurrency.

For More info:

I use SIGMAPLOT for curve fitting. Try that is easy

(I did not understand the setup, it would be nice if you show a schematic in a figure, I assume it is a free surface flow with a gate and a wave generator and one end)

Surge* governing equations (water hammer equations) are special form of full 3D Navier-Stokes. They have the exact structure of 2D Saint Venant (SWE) and 2D Euler equations mathematically. Back to your question, yes you can model it with Flow3D, model 3D N-S equation with moving object module as a boundary and you wold capture the wave due to closure of the gate. If your problem is symmetric in the transverse direction you may solve it with 2D layered averaged N-S solver of Flow3D as well.

PS:

* Surge in the literature of pump and pipeline means "water hammer", it is not the "storm surge" in the literature of coastal engineering

HI,

There are so many methods you can use HOMER, ACMANT, RHTEST, MASH, ANCI, etc. However, I recommend HOMER and ACMANT. They perform better than the rest.

Thank u all

So glad that what I wrote seems to have made sense to you. I see we are somewhat at similar lines. I do not yet think we have seen any final outcome of the use of digital ICTs. The next big, and somewhat quite disruptive thing I expect is development in the direction of learning analytics and adaptive learning. This will begin to respect that learners need different time and other different resources and relations to learn. Instead of time being the constant and learning variable, learning can be constant and time variable. But this destroys school scheduling and organisation and calls for reconstruction of social learning structures in organised education.

I leave a couple of attachments here to papers on RG, by Floridi, that I think you will like, related to my previous post - and a conference presentation of mine.

You write about constructivism - but I wonder if you are in your thinking closer to constructionism. Papert was a friend of Piaget (constructivist) but became in the end a constructionist. A lot of difference here. Floridi sees it as the difference between knowledge of the user and knowledge of the maker, and blames the knowledge of the user, knowledge as a spectator sport, on Plato. Floridi sees it as a historic mistake - it is the maker of artefacts (which Plato despised) who has deeper knowledge - he or she knows how it works, can take the artefact apart, explain and put it together again. Think of the difference between a car user and a car mechanic. Artefacts can also be non-physical of course. See attached paper ”What the makers knowledge could be”, and ”In defence of constructionism”. I will also send you on RG mail a short text behind a paywall.

However, if you are doing a dissertation under surveillance, deviations from the almost all-dominant constructivism dogma may not be problem-free. Just a heads-up...

R will provide all that you need. There are several ways to do this. For example, you can run a for loop to perform the 8000 wilcox.test() calls. It might be helpful for you to look at Microarray analysis teaching materials (for R), because this type of task is common in that field. For starters (R in general), use Google or have a look at https://www.researchgate.net/project/Teaching-R

search MOOC programming using Web Services

What for you are looking for such software? For researching fish or for catching them? I don't want to prejudice, but if the second, you are on the false and robbing side of the planet and you should rethink it.

Regards, Milan

Dear Colleague:

STRATER is not a freeware but it is compatible with other software packages such as SURFER, GRAPHER and DIDGER from Golden Software. It allows you to combine geophysical logs, chemologs and lithologs in combination with EXCEL.

H.G.Dill

Dear Rammahi,

Kaveh Zamani has presented you the best answer. I can add my article which shows the simulation of your question with SPH method based on experimental model of Hubert Chanson. I refer you to attached file.

Regards,

Hello, I think program can't be so accurate only with flow rate and column info the parameter which also have a influence on RT is system is dead volume which you should have for prediction.

Dead volume is different for all systems.

You can tray below program.

Which working not bad.

Hope this info will help you.

Good luck!

We have been using GoogleForms with excellent results. The tool automatically generation some summary charts and allows to export to Spreadsheets so you can manipulate the data.

Having a Software is quite helpful nowadays. In the Agriculture industry, with better software, you can manage and maintain your business with better accurately and smoothly.

The final version of the Android application for agriculture could boast about several useful features like:

calculation of fertilizers;

statistics sending;

remote facilities control;

calendar;

calculation of water consumption.

From the previous answers, matlab and WEKA have been refered as the most easy-to-use toolkits for new users, however, once if you want to do a little more complex AI related task, they will be not the most suitable candicates. Here, I think keras may be a more suitable ANN framework for new users, keras is a high-level toolkit with the backends of Tensorflow, CNTK or theano, which means that your can both relaise your idea by using a little codes with highly packaged interfaces , and take the advantages of GPU parallel computing and highly optimized instruction. Further, keras uses python, an easy-to-learn language to program.

###### keras LINK ######:

https://keras.io/

Dear Muhammad Latif, image J is the better software

Dear Muhammed,

Slope stability consists of numerous methodologies including Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM), Finite Element Method (FEM), Boundary Element Method (BEM), Rigid Element Method (REM), Limit Analysis Method (LAM), Discrete Element Method (DEM) as well as hyprid methodologies such as Finite-Discrete Element Method (FDEM) and many others that I may have forgot to mention.

These methodologies have all some advantages and disadvantages over one another. Infact hyprid theories have been continuously developed to overcome these facts. Many software packages have been written over the years but almost all of them have some limitations in every methodologies they represent, because developers need to simplfy the complex algortihms as much as possible to decrease mainly the time consumption of the development. Also please bear in mind that they are generally written commercially.

As I mentioned every theory have some limitations, considering LEM cannot represent the post failure situation of an instability nor the mechanism. Also, It ignores the deformation characteristics of the materials and many assumptions need to be made such as inter-slice force fucntions to represent the magnitude of forces between each slice.

Additionally, you need to have decent understanding of each theories to be able to develop a new method, which I honestly think that there is no need at this time since many analytical solutions are already present.

Best Regards

Bekir SF

I think that the best way to improve the usage of those resources is trying to create some kind of competition-related prizes (eg: badges, medals). If you perceive that your class is competitive you can decide about scores between grades (some of them are not so competitive and play only by scores could not be interesting).

The aim is to identify where lies the trade-off between challenge and stimulation to avoid that their willingness to participate fell down.

it is usual to use the earthquake ground acceleration record to calculate

time histories of the effective inertia forces on the structure. The analysis is

then carried out for these forces. In this type of analysis the displacements

at the support points are zero, and hence the calculated displacements,

velocities and accelerations at the nodes are relative to the ground. To get

the absolute accelerations at any node (which are needed to calculate the

“floor” response spectrum), the ground accelerations must be added to the

calculated relative accelerations.

For linear structural analysis with multi-support excitation, it is usual to use

a similar analysis method. In this method the ground accelerations at the

support points are used to calculate effective inertia forces, and an analysis

is carried out for these forces. This analysis assumes fixed supports, so the

displacements at the support points are zero. This is not correct, since

different supports can have different displacements, and hence the support points can displace relative to each other. This effect is accounted for by a

second analysis in which the relative support displacements are considered.

The results of the two analyses are added together. This approach can be

used for linear time history analysis and also for response spectrum

analysis.

Thank you everyone for your feedback.

The saddest part in Malaysia is that we don't have a supercomputer. Even if we have one, definitely I don't have an access to it.

So, the take home message is that I cannot do anything with a normal laptop at home. How about Molecular Dynamics or Molecular Mechanics. Do I still need to be connected to computational facilities?

I would say it is both a software (a computing environment) and a high-level proprietary programming language. Typical use of the MATLAB application is based on the MATLAB scripting language. On the other hand, MATLAB can call functions and subroutines written in other programming languages such as C or Fortran, which highlights its nature as a multi-paradigm numerical computing environment.

@ Akram Shavkatovich Hasanov Thanks a lot. That's a very useful suggestion. Do you know any such program in STATA?

This software does really well for me on regression. It can do multiple regression and customizable polynomial. Too bad it doesn't have logistic. But it is pretty new. Maybe they will add that function soon.

You can find it at https://vinci.bioturing.com/

2. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1169287/1169287.pdf

3. radar.gsa.ac.uk/2689/1/2689_FullTextREF.pdf

4. www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2011/P_1780.pdf

Correct Techniques, in line with gold standards. When people will be ready to control velocity, force and direction they are ready to come back to they life.

In order:

1) A bit of strength (Force impovement)

2) Movement velocity (total control)

3) Movement Directions (Be able to fully control the body segment)

In my view these are 3 important sign that the neuromuscular system is ready to come back to the normal life.

I agree with comment Wang above

" ou can have a try with Matlab, but the model you use should be clear"

You are dealing with physical properties that could vary from one location to another. No software can accurately evaluate it. You can plot it.

The best one is Edit software Magic plot

Hi..

The loop primers can also be desiged using the same tool.

(Primerexplorer version V4)

Dear Abdullah

i suggest you to use convert programme

follow my page

SPSS is a comprehensive statistics package that includes SEM and many other statistical methods. LISREL is just an SEM program.

It's probably not possible, at least not in a way that reviewers who really care about synergy would accept on your eventual publication.  If you have no idea what the dose curve for compound A is, you can't really say whether an effect is additive, synergistic, or antagonistic with respect to A.  The best you can really do is plot the two Gemcitabine dose curves, with or without A, and hope that the difference is big enough that nobody will care that you haven't done a proper analysis.

Why not just do the experiment properly, with multiple doses of the other compound?