Science topics: Social ScienceSocial Theory
Science topic
Social Theory - Science topic
Social Theory are social theories are frameworks of empirical evidence used to study and interpret social phenomena. A tool used by social scientists, social theories relate to historical debates over the most valid and reliable methodologies (e.g. positivism and antipositivism), as well as the primacy of either structure or agency.
Questions related to Social Theory
Pretendo conocer las diferentes lecturas que tienen otros autores sobre los retos a los que se enfrenta la sociedad inmigrante en su llegada a nuestro país. Me interesa hacerlo desde un punto de vista más amplio en cuanto a la relación con sus iguales en la sociedad para conocer además, las relaciones que adoptan con los miembros de ésta y como son estas relaciones.
Cuestión que abordará asuntos en orden a las epistemologías del sur
Alright all you "scholars" who love to sell your intellectual superiority. Are you bigots, elitists, racists and pushing down the public , refusing DEI by using intellectualism as a form of discrimination?
This must hurt your brains as you try to meld your ineffective theoretical DEI policy with your actual intellectualism inferred superiority that conflicts with your own social theories.
Suck on that egg
Con esta pregunta me gustaría indagar sobre aquellos autores que abordan las teorías sociales para analizar los desafíos de los adolescentes en las redes sociales para obtener una visión mas completa y fundamentada sobre dicho tema, conociendo y comprendiendo la visión de estos autores para abordar y comprender los impactos sociales de las plataformas digitales en la actualidad.
From the beginning of the twentieth century to the present, urbanization has gradually come to dominate political, economic, social and cultural landscapes of the contemporary world. To be urban was to be modern and the development of modern social theory relied on using the city as its research laboratory. In many of the global South cities, authorities still view informality as an annoyance and hinderance to a desired “modern” and “smart” city. Informality is still perceived as a nuisance, breeding spaces for crime, dirt, and disorder, and undesirable to a modern city.
Identify social theories that explain quality of life
Identify the sociological theories that explain climate change
I believe the answer to that question is a complex web of factors that I am attempting to put into a succinct form with my social theory I call "Death of the Village". I believe that a human's natural habitat in which they thrive consists of a "village structure" (ie: "it takes a village") where everyone works together, sharing resources and doing what they, personally do best to make one organism-like community. However, capitalism in particular discourages such social structures because it relies on constant growth and if people are sharing resources and only doing what they do best, then they aren't buying as many things.
Hi,
I want to study sustainability in firms, particularly at MESO level. I want to explain these levels from a social science perspective. Which one do you propose?
Micro is within the firm and their direct consumers.
Meso is when firms apply business models and collaborate and value co-created.
Macro is a collection of Meso's at a larger scale region, national etc.
What social science theory I can use to explain these levels and the interaction between them?
Thank you.
Identifying modern social theories that explain the elite
Determine the appropriate sociological theory to explain the social effects of the Corona pandemic
With the onset of the pandemic, more and more online formats have become established in counseling prosesses. I would like to investigate how the use of media affects the relationship in central students counseling. Since this is a sociological paper, i would first like to use Goffman to explain the field of interactions and then theoretically frame the counseling relationship. But i need a sociological theory that describes how relationships are established in counseling. Can someone help me?
This thread is for discussing how "elemental" approaches could be helpful today to renew and develop contemporary social theory. I first etched this line of inquiry int he attached piece, which appeared six years ago. I'm wondering if anybody is working along similar assumptions. Perhaps, more could be done by including contemporary artworks etc. into the discussion.
Thanks a lot for sharing your insights.
Based on your experiences what sociological theories and concepts are useful for nursing professionals when working at the pragmatic level in hospital (all levels), health care, primary health care?
#Nursing #Nurse #sociology
Throughout history, homosexuality has been cause for rejection and discrimination, and those who had this sexual condition were labeled and stigmatized socially, prejuzgados, imprisoned and treated as criminals, being victims of assault, torture and murder. For a long time this condition has been considered even an unnatural aberration and mental illness in different psychiatric diagnostic manuals. Currently in Spain, despite the existence of laws allowing homosexuals to marry and adopt children to form a family, as well as the recognition of their civil rights, remain a social group that suffers from social exclusion and suffer the scourge of homophobia, rejection and violence of those who regard them as different or sick. Perhaps that is the reason why either time to integrate to homosexuality as a plot more than the specialized social services, to combat the situation of social exclusion, and develop the resources and means to combat it.
¿Por qué la homosexualidad no es un colectivo que se incluya dentro del ámbito de los Servicios Sociales Especializados?
A lo largo de la historia la homosexualidad ha sido motivo de rechazo y discriminación, y aquellos que tenían esta condición sexual eran etiquetados y estigmatizados socialmente, prejuzgados, encarcelados y tratados como a delincuentes, siendo víctimas de agresiones, tortura y asesinato. Durante mucho tiempo esta condición ha sido considerada incluso como una aberración antinatural y una enfermedad mental en diversos manuales de diagnóstico psiquiátrico. Actualmente en España, pese a la existencia de leyes que permiten a los homosexuales a poder contraer matrimonio y adoptar hijos para formar una familia, así como al reconocimiento de sus derechos civiles, siguen siendo un colectivo social que sufre exclusión social y padece el azote de la homofobia, el rechazo y la violencia de aquellos que los consideran como diferentes o enfermos. Quizás por ello ya sea hora de integrar a la homosexualidad como una parcela más de los Servicios Sociales Especializados, para poder combatir la situación de exclusión social que sufren, y desarrollar los recursos y medios necesarios para combatirlo.
I am about to write an essay in relation to the social theory bong and how can this explain delinquency. I have read some reviewed articles and books by D.W. Winnicott (Deprivation and delinquency) and Hirschi Travis (Causes of delinquency).
So I was looking for more to be able to cover this theory better.
Hello
I'm interested in how norms, in particular political norms, are created in first place, maintained, broken. I have already read the best article for international norms which is International Norm Dynamics and Political Change by Finnemore and Sikkink but I am more interested in domestic political norms, for example how would we create norms against politicians lying . What books/articles would you recommend on norms in sociology, political science, philosophy etc? I have already have a background in social theory. Thanks in advance
Hi, I'm working on a social theory of clumsy and clumsiness. I have the sense it is an unrrated phenomenon of some importance in social life.
I look forward to clues, references & more. Thank you!
I am interested in recent discussions and reprises of animism in social theory. What is the latest anthropological knowledge of animism? How can it foster a renewal of social theory? Etc.
"Committing a crime violates social laws, while deviant behavior violates social norms and rules" (Sociological Theories of Crime - July 27, 2021).
Having a deviant behaviour may or may not lead a person to commit a crime. Can anyone help me understand how does having a deviant behavior lead a person to commit a crime? How much push/power a person with deviant behavior need before he/she commits a crime? Please provide citation for any references (sociology journals, government websites, law journals, courts documents, other reading materials).
I am specifically looking for what stop these people from committing criminal acts. If they passed the hurdle (not bounded by the factor that stops them), what stop them to commit only one criminal act (self-reflect, intervention and punishment by the law come to my mind)? If there are some studies done regarding this for any type of criminal acts, I would like to read them.
There must be something regarding people committing crimes with no discernible deviant behaviors.
Point out the sociological theory and methodology
I am working in the field of social sustainability research. I am struggling to find the theories used in Social Sustainability. Actually, for the development of the theoretical framework of my thesis, I need a theory that explains social sustainability and its themes, for example, Health, Transportation availability, Satisfied with Space, Open Space, and so on.
Would you please help me to provide the information about which theory can explain social sustainability and its themes?
Respected Scholars! What are the sayings/views about intersex and trans people (Jesus) an old/new Testament/Version? I am entire need of it for my research.
Regards,
Mouna (awaiting)
In my current thinking/writing I have been exploring ideas behind quantum social theory, for example the potential of an entropic society. Here, such a society exhibits a default (temporal) tendency toward disorder. Entropy increases unless society works to reduce it. Why? Because, from a quantum super-positional perspective on a society of individuals, there is an infinite potential for interference through quantum interdependency: there is an indeterminate potentiality to disorder, with only a limited number of determinable, observable events that may signify order.
Statistically, unless we invest in reducing the range of interdependencies and thus work to reduce the indeterminacy of state changes and/or interferences, by implementing (social) negentropic constraints, we will experience emergent disorder. Such constraints, including our social institutions, laws, ethics and morals, are designed to increase the probability that a given/anticipated/expected/desired state change within society may be observable. This is society’s desire for normativity.
Yet, as I think on these lines, I begin to see the potential of the autistic mind and its consciousness as a radical free agent unbound to the idea of negentropic normativity. This, to my mind is a positive prospect: autism’s value to society. Society needs its free radicals to prevent excessive negentropy. By attention to the radical free agents of society, we can be reminded that social normativity cannot rule out indeterminacy entirely: society must respect its entropic potential. And, while all about us seek to normalise our activities, we can look to autism to remind us of our full, unrealised potential.
Thoughts? All opinions, normative and non-normative are welcome.
In my current thinking/writing I have been exploring ideas behind quantum social theory, for example the potential of an entropic society. Here, such a society exhibits a default (temporal) tendency toward disorder. Entropy increases unless society works to reduce it. Why? Because, from a quantum super-positional perspective on a society of individuals, there is an infinite potential for interference through quantum interdependency: there is an indeterminate potentiality to disorder, with only a limited number of determinable, observable events that may signify order.
Statistically, unless we invest in reducing the range of interdependencies and thus work to reduce the indeterminacy of state changes and/or interferences, by implementing (social) negentropic constraints, we will experience emergent disorder. Such constraints, including our social institutions, laws, ethics and morals, are designed to increase the probability that a given/anticipated/expected/desired state change within society may be observable. This is society’s desire for normativity.
Yet, as I think on these lines, I begin to see the potential of the entrepreneurial mind and its consciousness as a radical free agent unbound to the idea of the negentropic normativity of corporate life. This, to my mind, is a positive prospect: the entrepreneur’s value to our social-economy. Our socio-economic life needs its free radicals to prevent excessive negentropy. By attention to the radical free agents of society, we can be reminded that corporate normativity cannot (and should not) rule out indeterminacy entirely: the socio-economic society must respect its entropic potential. And, while corporations seek to normalise their activities, we can look to the entrepreneurs to remind us of our full, unrealised potential.
Thoughts? All opinions, normative and non-normative are welcome.
Khaneledj should the students understand about Sociology theories
Seeking help to make a theoretical framework
Since there are many theories on globalisation, I am searching best theories which can be applied to explain cultural globalisation.
The theory of social capital in the social sciences is well developed, considering not only sociology, but also political science and economics. However, in the modern world, which is called the period of formation and development of digital society, the question arises as to whether digital capital can exist? As a form of social capital, as a structure that reproduces social inequalities, as a mechanism for the institutionalization of social (and maybe digital?) Relations. What do you think about it? And how can digital capital be conceptualized in sociology?
Hello,
I looking for work that takes a predominantly developing /under(semi)developed, etc. perspective in discussing socio-economic issues in countries in the "periphery" of Europe (South, East, less developed regions, etc). That is work that uses concepts, ideas, theories, methodologies, etc typically associated with less developed countries to approach issues in the "periphery" of Europe. I'm interested in either contemporary of historical analyses.
Thank you!
I have planned to do a qualitative reaserch based on health belief model on betal chewing using focus groups. I have collected few data. In the ibnterpretationj how am I to analyse this. My plan was to get constructs of the theory as themes and find matching codes from the transcripts. Is that deductive apparoch or am I wrong?
Am searching for publications on female entrepreneurs' and their motivations and intents.
This is a deliberately loose thread of discussion where everybody is welcome to add authors, schools and approaches that are arguably contributing in meaningful ways to the renewal and avancement of contemporary social theory. Ideas and references wanted!
Hello everyone,
I'm in the process of writing a paper on how ideologies influence group action.
Most of the literature I've read so far focuses on how ideology rather influences on an individual level the members of groups. Therefore, the group level is often left out, which bothers me. It's not to say I haven't found anything on the group level; there is some interesting content.
But I wonder if I should mention the studies I've read that focus on the individual level. At the end of the day, groups are made of individuals. And, if I manage to assess that certain ideologies really influence most of the members of the groups I have to analyze, this will give me an element of response for my work. What do you think?
Moreover, I was wondering if there were sociological theories that deal with the problem I'm facing.
Hopefully, my question is clear.
Kind regards.
Please suggest me sociological theories for my research related to land reform policies and its implementation
I need some help in locating different theories that explicitly distinguish between how a person perceives her-/himself and how others see that person. Of course, Social Identity Theory refers to something quite similar to this as the ingroup–outgroup distinction. Côté and Levine1 talk about the person's subjective experience of his/her identities versus the objective identities as defined by others who observe that person.
- Are there any other theories that distinguish between internal and external perspectives/aspects of identity?
- Any info or comments on this distinction would be most welcome.
Thanks.
1Identity formation, agency, and culture: a social psychological synthesis (2002): p. 134
I'm looking for research and studies using Goffman's theory to approach contemporary urban life (including issues of new technologies, AI, urban safety, extremism, epidemics etc…). Obliged to anyone who can point me to relevant materials. Thank you.
I tried to learn something about the philosophy of technology from several books and anthologies, but I did not find much relevant content in them. Some of those books dedicate a lot of space to Plato and Aristotle; Marx is often held in high esteem, and Heidegger is considered the supreme master. But Plato and Aristotle did not see much of technology, and Marx's discourse is slightly old. Heidegger did not manage to say anything that seems (1) understandable, (2) correct, (3) relevant) and (4) new at the same time. What about communication, surveillance, and intense manipulation which information technology has facilitated during the last years?
Put differently, how does the reductionism explicit in agent-based modelling (noting that ABM is gaining popularity with social scientists) square with the seeming inclination of social theoreticians to seek to describe and find the causes of social phenomena only at the social level?
For many years now, I fail to find the original source of a concept in social theory that distinguishes between four or five 'levels' of analysis and/or intervention. Various versions are circulating, but they all more or less boil down to the following:
1. content (what),
2. procedure (how),
3. interpersonal (here & now dynamics in the actual situation),
4. intrapersonal (of the/an individual), and
5. hypothetical factors of which the actors are not (yet) conscious.
The best guess so far is Brendan Reddy, who paints an 'iceberg' image with 'levels' 1 and 2 above and the others below the surface (see 1994: Intervention Skills - Process Consultation for Small Groups and Teams).
My current hypothesis is that he developed this concept for his work at the National Training Laboratories in Bethel, Maine. Yet, there is no definitive evidence and in spite of many attempts I haven't succeeded in locating people who would be able to confirm or falsify my hunch.
Hello Everyone,
I am looking for journals in the areas of social or political theory, sociology or a related discipline, that accept longer book reviews (between 2000 and 3000) words. So far, I have published those in the Journal of Political Power, but I am looking to expand. The book I seek to review will be fresh out in the summer and deal with the theoretical investigation of the phenomenon of social and political power. It does not have to have a high citation score or rank, but it should be a trustworthy and legit academic journal, not a predatory jurinal.
Thank you very much,
Martin.
Here is a sensible initiative to this end bearing witness from overlooked parts of the world.
I am looking for some research articles, bulletin, research papers as a reference to support the idea that Empathic concern (one's feeling of empathy) influence the helping behavior via Attitude, Social norms and perceived behavioral control (Theory of Planned behavior). Please recommend me some references in Urban Planning or Transportation context.
Thanks in advance
Greetings Colleagues
Within the sphere of social science - which explanatory frameworks or models do you apply to situate your work? These are also referred to as conceptual and theoretical frameworks.
I am interested in the following types:
- Epistemology (knowledge orientations)
- Ontology (existence/being)
- Culture (principles/values/modes of social organisation)
- Pedagogy (educational).
Feel free to refer to your own frameworks or scholars who have been central in your research. Please also share "benefits" of these for scholarly argumentation.
Many thanks
Oscar Oliver Eybers
My topic is “Polymorphous Discrimination: Rohingya Women in the Goggles of Intersectionality“. I would be happy to have a number of scientific journals to publish in: any Credible journals are therefore welcome. Thanks a lot for your suggestion.
i need to understand how gated affects socially on social fabric
While doing a research on a subject in social sciences; which of the approaches makes it more reasonable to base the research on one theory, based on more than one theory separately, and examine it by integrating more than one theory? What can be advantages and disadvantages of them?
For example when investigating insurance fraud; the fraud behavior can be related with personality theories, social learning theories, ethical theories or social cognitive theories.
Is it a atheoretical when you are not using an explicit social theory in a social research?
In fact all social research are theoretical. In case of no use of social theory, a theory by default creeps into. This is the theory of natural selection/or survival of the fittest. This is unacceptable.
I need such a model to carry out a research.
Habitus is understood in the way, it was used by Bourdieu and Elias
I am working on the rape crisis during the 1947 Partition of India and its representation in the Indian cinema. Where can I find data on the number of rape victims/survivors of that period?
Hi, I am a german university student (business administration and psychology) and I am going to write my bachelor thesis.
I would like to research a correlation between stress and the language. For the following points I need your help:
- differently option for stress induction
- or unsolvable tasks for stress induction
- or questionnaire for stress induction
I know about the trier social stress test and the socially evaluative cold water stress test, so I need other options. The best way for me is, to have a computeraided stress test.
I hope you can help me and make my student life a little easier :-).
Best regards,
Timo Köhler
I am using 3 theories in my research proposal and i want to anticipate the challenges i might face .
I am doing a research on effect of social media use on marital satisfaction among married individuals. I would like to ask is there any theories related to social media and marriages.
it should include theory of social inclusion
empirical studies on social inclusion
The theme of my paper has the aim to examine social and cultural adaption on individual refugees in Denmark, while they waiting on family reunification.
I have researched on theories, however I find it difficult to find theories that fits the theme.
Any suggestions on theories?
Thanks in advance.
How social media can be theoretically define ?
What do you know and understand about Muslim tourism? Share with me your ideas.
A model is to be proposed based several social theories such as Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior and Diffusion of Innovation Theory.
It has become commonplace to refer to colonialism, or some of its declinations such as post-colonialism or coloniality, as general terms to situate contemporary social exclusion, marginality, and resistance. This conceptual choice has the great advantage of drawing attention to historical continuities between contemporary structures and the centuries-long reproduction of structures of domination. However, is it possible that the conceptual strength of this lumping also hinders our ability to understand the specific modalities of social injustice in various contexts and in different historical moments? Is it possible that this choice leads us to conflate, for example, colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, and modernity, as an overly coherent project? Your thoughts will be most welcome!
Tilly, Charles. 2002. Stories, identities, and political change. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
"Social sites consist of loci in which organized human action occurs; they include individuals, aspects of individuals, organizations, networks, and places" (Tilly 2002, xi).
"Let us think of an individual as one kind of social site -a locus of coordinated social action" (Tilly 2002, 11).
Social sites appears as a relational outcome (Emirbayer, 1998), and as locus or loci in relation. The relational (realism) persuasion maintains as a coherent ontological principle of the program. Indeed, Tilly (2002, xii) claims "that transactions are real and observable", as "transfers of energy orginazed by people" connecting social sites (2002, xi).
"To put it more ponderously, but also more accurately, social life consists of relationally and culturally channeled, error-filled and error-correcting transactions among social sites that continuously modify the relations and culture within which they occur" (Tilly, 2002, xi).
So, if social transactions and relations are "the fundamental entities of social life" (2002, xi), ¿which is the reality status or logical position of social sites relative to social transactions?.
My first response to this question was to assume some type of equivalence between social transactions and their occurrence: events. And, then to apply the relational logic operation: (some identifiable regular) social change results from the sets of transactions which take place between (some bounded) social sites, those changes are experimented by, and setup, the social sites in which social transactions realized.
So, events can be assumed as concrete instances of social transactions between social sites. Recognizing that, relationally, social transactions implies the alteration or change on transaction-embedded social sites.
What I have is
“A mindset is a mental attitude. It shapes our actions and our thoughts” (Meier & Kropp, 2010, p. 179)
and
“the sum total of the activated cognitive procedures” (Gollwitzer, 2011, p. 528).
Can somebody please recommend something more - ideally a discussion to the term?
Please not about growth/fixed mindset - this is too narrow right here.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Mindset Theory of Action Phases. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume One (New., pp. 526–546). Los Angeles: Sage Social Psychology Program.
Meier, J. D., & Kropp, M. (2010). Getting Results the Agile Way: A Personal Results System for Work and Life. Bellevue, WA: Innovation Playhouse.
So far I have not found a solid paper on theory based qualitative to use as references. The field in a very broad sense is social theory,
Any experiences or references?
Hi,
I'm looking for Transition Theory in social science and I aim to use it as a framework. I haven't find seminal works of it, perhaps there is non...
Do you have any authors and suggestions?
I'll be writing about the evolution of bottom-up initiatives around a study case on Food System change and a neighbour case implementing a top-down approach.
Thanks!
My research is focused on the traditional apartments of Brasília, Brasil's modernist capital. I'm intersted in understanding the transformations of the domestic space along time.
Similarities between the two texts.
Any comprehensive discussion of Elias' take on Freud's social theory? Thank you if you can refer me to sources.
Among the Asante of Ghana, family property is considered as one that belongs to the living (in the material world) and the dead (ancestors who live in the spiritual world). It serves as social security for the family. Money, a house or land are examples. Because of the spiritual (ancestral) connection, such properties are not disposable. Land for example, is not supposed to be sold. Money lent to a family member has to be refunded before s/he dies.
There are many definitions of model-based sciences, which have a different philosophical meaning. This is due to the fact that the signification of the term ‘model’ is ambiguous: some of these theories may be based only on one kind of models and are unable to integrate in their field the other ones. I will give here two examples of model-based theories, but you can find many other ones.
The semantic theory of models, more recently called a ‘model-based’ view of science attacked the empirical explanatory models, which dominated the philosophy of science before the 1960’s, and promoted formal explanatory models during the following decade. Even if various versions of this approach differ (Patrick Suppes, Frederick Suppe, Bas van Fraassen, etc.), it continues to be developed nowadays. In this approach models, as abstract representations of some portion of the world which are different from empirical laws, are the central element of scientific knowledge. For 21st century researcher, computer modelling will permit the statement, manipulation, and evaluation of more and more complex theoretical models, as Thomas Burch (2017) said. But how in this case identify the relations between the theoretical model and the empirical observations, and test the fit of a simulation model? There is a real danger to construct theoretical models without any relationship with observed data and no way to verify this relationship.
The mechanistic view, which had been mainly developed for biological sciences during the 1990’s, is also considered as a model-based science. Again various versions of this approach differ (William Bechtel, Carl Carver, Stuart Glennan, etc.), but its development nowadays is increasing not only for biological sciences but for social sciences. A more recent version of this view is given by Robert Franck (2002) as the functional-mechanistic approach. As the semantic view the mechanistic theory of models rejects the empirical explanatory approach, and may appear as similar. But, while for the semantic approach a theory is a formal system empty of any empirical content, the mechanistic one infers, from the sustained observation of some property of nature, its functional structure –in classical terms the axiom, form, principle or law- which rules the process generating this property, and without which this property could not come about as it does. By focusing on the mechanism, generating a social property, the functional structure is treated independently of the causal structure, and may be generalized. We used this approach, with other researchers, in a recent paper on model-based demography (2017).
Under this question, I would like to discuss here the different model-based theories, their main aims, and the use of the term model.
References
Burch T. (2017). Model-based demography. Springer.
Courgeau D., Bijak J., Franck T., Silverman E. (2017). Model-based demography: towards a research agenda. In Agent-based modelling in Population Studies, Grow A., van Bavel J. eds., Springer.
Franck R. ed. (2001). The explanatory power of models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mäki U. (2001). Models: philosophical aspects. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Smelser N.J., Baltes P.B. eds., Elsevier Ltd.
dear fellow researchers could you provide a definition of social presence in the context of social commerce. It will be the starting point towards conceptualizing a multidimensional concept of social presence in the context of social commerce.
Many Thanks
Innovation systems benefit from diversity, however, trust and social cohesion are important for building social capital. what are the tradeoffs/implications between diversity as a favorable feature in innovation systems and social cohesion, trust?
Does cultural transformation represent a new challenge for organizations?
Two studies found self-uncertainty salience increased the subjective distance with the past self. How to build a rational story of them in the introduction? I thought about temporal self-appraisal theory, temporal comparison theory, construal level theory etc. But still cannot build a satisfactory rationale and highlight the contribution. The results are solid and interesting, Happy to hear some suggestions and may cooperate on the revision of this paper.
I am trying to best understand the method to how prejudice reduction is measured.
What is the theory describe the relation between risk management and social accounting?
hello can someone please help me with the literature review of ' economics of net neutrality' and how to conduct the methodology? primary data or secondary data?
I can see several approaches. 1. Todorovs fairytales. 2 joseph Campbells archtypes, 3. Formalist approaches to love triangles and things like that 4. Game theory.
Does anyone know of theoretical models that search for patterns in plots, or which use these patterns in plot construction? I am not talking about acts, or theories about story climax. Any suggestions as to how i can improve upon this reasoning?
Is it possible for instance to treat all crime novels as sequential games with perfect information and a limited number of outcomes. Is it possible for instance to construct as decision map of a crime novel?
I want to know the points of relation between identity and gender constructions. When one is doing a critical analysis of identity, can we say that the analyst can include the analysis of the way gender plays up in the text?
Black Emancipatory Action Research includes at its core participatory and action research methodology which imperatively rely on community participation and community empowerment at all stages of research. Moreover theoretical grounding in Black Studies and Critical Race Theory facilitates adoption of the Afrocentric perspective to knowledge creation and interpretation.
I am looking for research on the stability of attitudes formed as a result of higher education, specifically entrepreneurship courses.
I wish to apply DHA for text analysis of autobiographies to study gender identity in a socio-political context of Pakistan.
I am currently working on a research on gender-based prejudice against Muslims and looking for a scale to measure implicit attitude and I would like to know what options we have apart from IAT scale.
i'm not sure if i can use impression management theory and uses and gratification so the users use SNSs to express themselves and to manage their self representations
Hello,
Can anyone recommend articles or reviews that deal with Social Identity Theory and decision making.
I'm social psychologist and my knowledge in ethology and animal behavior literature is very limited. I’m currently working on comparative project on collective violence and the idea of comparison of ant and man social behavior seems very tempting. I’ve read several experimental and natural observation papers and the field seems very interesting. I’m looking for a review paper or a book that summarizes all lines of inquiry and relatively up to date knowledge on the subject of inter colony conflicts. I would be very grateful for any hints.
I am working on a thesis evaluating a particular theodicy as an explanation for the coexistence of gratuitous evil and God's sovereignty. I am having difficulty finding an established methodology which fits my research.
From the DCP forum: The value of formulation: A question for debate.
I'm trying to develop a scale to measure effects of social networking sites usage on children's attitudes towards family relationships, do you have ideas?
The Question is about the Nature of the Rules that will be applied during the period of change of political and legal systems. Which of the Rules will be applied during the so-called Transitional period ... Thank you for your contributions to answer the question.
Difference between theoretical underpinnings and philosophical underpinnings of a methodology ?
What I'm looking for is similarities between the two texts because as I read both of them, I cannot find a answer except for feminism but in the back of my mind I know it is more than feminism.
I wonder if we really can offer solutions to the social issues we describe and explain. For exemple if we discover relational problems in an organization, do we also offer solutions to them? If we do, are they common sense solutions or from where do they come from? Do we study in sociology training programmes how to offer solutions to the problems we discover through research?
psychology and its methods are clearly racist, it was built as an othering tool by the coloniser. Therefore, how do we begin to speak against the mainstream psychology in decolonial terms?
I'm in the early stages of a project and would like to measure resilience in transitional age foster youth and am looking for an appropriate instrument. While I recognize there are many perspectives on the development of resiliency, foster youth may perceive "family" and "community" differently than other populations.
I have chosen this question myself, but am struggling to find enough solid lines of argument or relevant examples .
If anyone could help with any of this that would be hugely appreciated!
Thanks
This project builds on a book I coauthored last year, Human Rights in Children's Literature: Imagination and the Narrative of Law (OUP 2016). I'm looking for diverse children's literature sources that explore human rights issues. Any and all suggestions are welcome. Thank you.
I am embarking on research in the field of reinforcement learning and I would like to get a good grassroots grasp on the topic of Markov Decision Processes (MDP). I would be very glad if someone knowledgeable in this field would take some time out of his busy schedule and direct me towards some good study materials that would deal with the basics of MDP as well as go a bit deep into it.
Thanks
What paper/scholar is considered to have introduced/popularized the notion of the "masculunity contest" in sociology/gender studies?
I've seen the concept in a number of studies (e.g. Jennifer Berdahl's work) and I think it's great, but I haven't been able to trace it back to a clear origin.