Science topic
Social Psychiatry - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Social Psychiatry, and find Social Psychiatry experts.
Questions related to Social Psychiatry
Assisi 2024
PERSON-CENTERED HEALTH
and THE RESILENT ADOLESCENT
ASSISI 25-26-27 October 2024
Pre-Conference presentation of the Congress Assisi 2024
Milan, 1 June 2024
THE INDUCTION OF RESILIENCE THAT INVOLVES ALL DIMENSIONS OF THE PERSON, SPIRIT-MIND AND BODY, WHICH CANNOT BE FRAGMENTED, IS THE GREAT CHALLENGE OF HEALTH SYSTEMS AND INDIVIDUALS, WHO ARE STILL MORE ORIENTED TO BE PROBLEM-CENTERED, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUBJECTED TO PRESSURE FOR PROFIT. TO DATE, WE HAVE AN EFFECTIVE CLINICAL METHOD AND PERSON-CENTERED HEALTH PROGRAMS FOR INDUCING RESILIENCE AND RESEARCH METHODS THAT ASK TO BE APPLIED AND SHARED.
THE AIM OF THE CONGRESS IS TO PROMOTE THE PRESENTATION AND SHARING OF THEORIES, RESEARCH, METHODS, CLINICAL CASES FOCUSED ON THE RESILIENCE OF ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN DIFFERENT SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS WITH A MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND INTEGRABLE APPROACH according the person-centered health paradigm:
" THE BEST POSSIBILITIES FOR BEING THE BEST HUMAN PERSON"
ASSISI, WHERE THE WFSA, SIAD, AND THE AMBROSIANA UNIVERSITY HAVE PROMOTED 11 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSES AND WHERE IN 1993 THE ADOLESCENTOLOGY THEORY , KAIROLOGY AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF YOUTH RIGHTS AND DUTIES WERE PRESENTED TO THE WORLD, IS AN IDEAL CITY TO HOST THIS MILESTONE CONGRESS.
THEORETICAL , AND EXPERIMENTAL PRESENTATIONS, CLINICAL REPORTS, PROGRAMS AND METHODS, SYMPOSIA ARE WELCOME
WELCOME IN ITALY AND IN ASSISI FOR THIS UNFORGETTABLE CONFERENCE
MAIN TOPICS
Person-centered health theory
and resilience in young people
Spirituality, religious faith and resilience
Family and resilience
Education in Youth Health Rights
Person-centered medicine and
young people
Health Education to resilience
Learning programs to resilience in schools
Counseling with the adolescent and young people
Psichotherapy with the adolescent
Medical Education and resilience
Special topic
A threat to humanity: the smartphone addiction. Philosophy,Social Psychiatry,Psycho-Neurobiology
Abstracts on
Artificial intelligence
Mental health, adolescence and resilience in particular social and cultural contexts as war, immigration.
Health psychoanalysis and the promotion of the genital personality
Psychoneurobiology, epigenetics and resilience
Mental health and resilience to drugs
Epidemiological theory and resilience
are welcome
LE ROY TRAVIS
WFSA INTERNATIONAL PRIZE
FOR THE BEST PRESENTATION
by INVESTIGATORS UNDER 35
Workshops
Person-Centered Health Program (Kairos program)
Resilience and research methods
Medical education
in Person-Centered Clinical Method
Invitation to attend the
The chairs: Giuseppe R.Brera , Claudio Violato, Richard Fiordo
Conference website
By Trialogue, I mean Trialogue events like the Psychosis Seminar or the Borderline Trialogue in the field of social psychiatry.
How would you theoretically underpin the Trialogue? Which theories would you use?
And specifically, from the perspective of Clinical Social Work: with which theories would you connect the Trialogue?
Thanks a lot!
The issue of success and what is behind it as the very definition of is something that has been debated since the advent of man. If we approach the subject from a monetary view most scholars probably agree that the best predictors of success if we think in terms of hierarchies, whether it is a dominance or competence hierarchy , depending on which perspective you adopt is general cognitive ability and conscientiousness. Something I noted is that most researchers, especially psychologists underestimate the sociocultural aspects.
My question is that if you were to create a model, predicting success, which factors would you include? Can gender be a predictor? Race? Can we also approach the subject from a social constructionist standpoint? Perhaps biology? Would you look at the individual as an idiosyncratic being or would you expand your scope also to encompass culture and institutions?
What are your thoughts?
Best wishes Henrik
There are two theories that are quite similar in nature, but different in substance, The theory of Mind and the theory of Mentaliz(S)ation, sorry, Im allergic to American spelling...pls dont kill me now :-) My understanding of them is this "Both of these concepts, mentalization and the theory of mind, describes processes that are metacognitive in their nature . Mentalization mainly concerns the reflection of affective or emotional mental states. In contrast however the, theory of mind focuses on things epistemic in nature such as beliefs, intentions and persuasions. My idea is that these two theories by them self are incomplete but combining elements of both, gives us a clearer understanding. Cognition and affect can't in my view be separated, they are both part of us as human beings and also a part of other animals. What are your thoughts? Am I wrong or right? I can stand criticism so bring it on...
I am asking this question to prepare for a seminar in the Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry at McGill University.
My seminar proposal is attached.
Your thoughts from all disciplines are most welcome.
- Vincenzo Di Nicola
Social Psychiatry has been a key approach in psychiatry for many decades, straddling social aspects of psychiatry, public health and epidemiology, and such fields as medical/health anthropology and sociology. Now we need to update our definition of this important field with a 21st century definition. How is Social Psychiatry different from and unique in comparison to the already well-established Cultural Psychiatry and the new Global Mental Health Movement?
Does anyone have research on the theory that stigmatizing behaviour towards individuals with schizophrenia has a higher preference when shown by the older generation because of the lack of knowledge and understanding of the condition?
Recently I am trying to figure out the cultural differences of children's social interaction, especially at the behavioral level. Among the experimental videos of U.S. and Chinese American child play I have watched, I found it hard to locate those differences. Is there anyone with any ideas or thoughts on this issue? Thanks!
I'm working on research using a secondary data base of an epidemiological survey, and the ethics committee of my institution requires me to have an approval for publishing the final report, in spite of being a co-author of the primary investigation and having the institutional authorization for the use of the above mentioned base. Is this correct?
The assessment needs to be applied as part of a multi-center study at baseline and 18-months follow-up; it will be part of a larger battery. Therefore, about 10 minutes of time for assessment are the limit. Thanks for your suggestions.