Science topic
Social Entrepreneurship - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Social Entrepreneurship, and find Social Entrepreneurship experts.
Questions related to Social Entrepreneurship
Part of our Research Intensive University Plan is to develop research with Inter-University from all over the world. Therefore, I am asking if there is an ongoing paper you want me to collaborate with; or if we could start a new research topic. Hoping for honest and interesting answers.
I was thinking of something along the lines of strategy formulation.
I am currently researching on social entrepeneurship and innovation in sub saharan Africa. However, I am looking for people who would like to co- join in writing papers on Social entrepreneurship, Innovation, indigenous entrepreneurship, youth employment and Agripreneurship in Africa.
Please contact me if you are interested.
What do we mean by value? How is value created? What are the different conceptual models that relate to value creation especially in the context of entrepreneurship/ social entrepreneurship?
Can the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship be an important factor in defending the domestic economy against the forecasted, progressive slowdown in economic growth in the global economy in 2019?
Does the activation of economic processes through the development of pro-development innovation policy programs, activation of innovation and entrepreneurship can be an important factor in defending the national economy against a progressive slowdown in economic growth in the global economy and against the risk of a recession in the domestic economy that could occur through cross-border trade and international capital flows?
The importance of this question is important especially for countries with an open economy with a large share of cross-border trade and the growing share of globalization processes. In addition, this question is valid in the context of the projected slowdown in economic growth in many countries in 2019.
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
Can the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship be an important factor in defending the domestic economy against the forecasted, progressive slowdown in economic growth in the global economy in 2019?
Please reply
Best wishes
Hi, for my thesis project I am doing a mediation analysis which claims that prosocial behaviors mediates between the culture and social entrepreneurship activity. I use several cultural dimensions, puting them seperately and then running the program and checking the results. So the thing is, I try to approach PROCESS results with causal steps approach of Baron & Kenny (1986) and according to this the first thing I need to check is that X and Y (In my case Culture and Social entrepreneurship activity) must be significantly associated.
One of the models as I shared here has no significant association in c path (Culture and Social entrepreneurship) but has a significant relationship on both a and b paths while c' is non significant. So according to Baron and Kenny approach I should stop when c is not significant and say there is no mediation however it seems this variable i test as a mediator has a significant effect on my dependent variable. How should I mention this in my report?
Academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship are developed at universities to support innovation and entrepreneurship of students. Incubators are also a supplement to the educational program in the field of activating the innovation and entrepreneurship of students. Incubators sometimes also perform functions or cooperate with a career office for students. Career offices collect employment offers and organize internships for students through cooperation with companies and institutions that employ or give practice to students.
Sometimes academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship also cooperate with various institutions and companies in which students find employment or take apprenticeships. In addition, academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship, cooperating with various institutions and companies, enable the establishment of clusters of innovation, in which various economic entities, public institutions, scientific institutes and universities cooperate with each other. In this way, the possibilities of entrepreneurship development and generation of innovative solutions in assumed and developed research projects and startups are increasing.
Sometimes, also with the innovation cluster or business incubator, financial institutions cooperate, primarily banks offering financial support in the form of preferential loans for developing innovative startups. However, at the early stage of the establishment of business activity by students and organizations, the most important role is provided by substantive support in the field of advising on the formal and legal issues and accounting service of the university, lecturers and employees of the academic entrepreneurship incubator.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What is the role of academic business incubators?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
Activation of entrepreneurship and innovation is essential for effective socio-economic development of the national economy.
Failure in entrepreneurship in the context of entire markets, sectors, the whole society, the entire economy is a negative effect of taking risks in the situation of starting a business and running a business.
This is the price of few, spectacular business successes. Therefore, it should not be reduced due to the existence of investment risk. Investment risk should be examined, analyzed, measured and hedged, for example, in the form of maintaining established, estimated financial provisions for the situation of potential loss of financial liquidity. An entrepreneur should take risks, accept a certain level of investment risk, measured and hedged risk.
Entrepreneurship should be supported by both public sector institutions and through private investment funds that finance the development of innovative startups. In modern knowledge-based economies, the state through central and through local government public institutions should support the development of entrepreneurship and innovation.
In view of the above, the current question is: Should the state support the development of entrepreneurship and innovation?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
How can entrepreneurship and innovation be stimulated to develop in the framework of improvement of pro-development socio-economic policy?
What are the main barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country and what should be improved in pro-innovation economic policy?
What should be changed in economic policy to reduce barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation?
In many developed countries, the main barriers to innovation are high labor costs, high taxes and parapositive contributions under the public finance system.
Are these barriers to the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in your country similar or different?
Please reply
Best wishes
I studied a number of research papers on "Knowledge Entrepreneurship". However, most of the researchers conducted qualitative research. Kindly, suggest me any quantitative research on Knowledge Entrepreneurship. Moreover, recommend the developed scale for Knowledge Entrepreneurship.
I am planning to do research on social entrepreneurship and social innovation intent among youth, especially technical students. In this context is there any standard model that can be tested where the sampling units are UG and PG students studying in Indian universities. Also, I request someone to give a standard reference material in this regard for review of literature and research methods and methodology.
Do you have medical cooperatives in your country? What is your opinion about the possible models of cooperatives in medicine that are proposed in this article? -
Serge Moscovici and his theory of Social representation is a stream of research that interests me a lot. The question of future directions of research is also something I contemplated on. How do you see research in this field evolving?
I did my contribution a month ago with the connection of social representation to international business, entrepreneurship, attitudes , education and decision making logic.
Article can be found here:
So once again :-) What is the future for social representations?
Best wishes Henrik
Dear scholars,
The UN estimated that the economic fallout could push an estimated half a billion people into poverty and take global development progress back three decades, primarily in emerging economies. Under this bad situation, do you think social entrepreneurs are able to help to recovery from the COVID-19 crisis? What they can do during this period?.
Please share your opinion with many thanks in advance.
If entrepreneurship is a mindset then social entrepreneurship is also just a mindset or anything more? To answer this question I felt one more dimension to this problem is the personality trait, then further I introspected then felt no more than personality a social entrepreneur should be a person with skills, but cannot be just being emotional.
Dear all,
Social entrepreneurship could be one of the career options for fresh graduate students. However, the primary goal of social entrepreneurship is to create a social value for society, meaning that generating exorbitant money (for the owners of social enterprises) is not its primary agenda. Hence, social entrepreneurship may not be a favorable career option for all students. So, how can minimizing students goal from profit orientation to slowly social orientation?
Thanks in advance.
I am interested in studying the experiences and motivations for philanthropy in Kenya by HNWIs. However, I would like my research questions to be grounded from gaps in theory and empirical research in philanthropy and social entrepreneurship. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Management theory was for long dominated by Causation, (just think about Kotler, in other words Planning, Implementing and follow up.) a different theory that has gained momentum in the last years ( Even if it was first launched in 2001 by Saras D Sarasvathy) is the theory of effectuation that is means driven instead of ends driven. I studied those theories quite extensively but found that when it comes to effectuation there is still no consensus, in other words the theory is not yet mature, something that is in my view a bit odd since the theory is 20 years old just about. Why do you think it has taken such a long time for this theory to mature? my second question. What is the relevance of Kotlers Marketing Management today? Still relevant or? Your thoughts?
The enterprise sector of SMEs generates the majority of output of entire economies. To a large extent, therefore, the economic situation in the entire national economy depends on the economic and financial condition of economic entities in this sector.
The aim of activating economic processes is necessary to create and develop instruments of state intervention, thanks to which it is possible to effectively stimulate entrepreneurship and innovation of economic entities of the SME sector.
In view of the above, I would like to ask you: What are the instruments of state intervention in your countries to stimulate entrepreneurship and innovation in enterprises in the SME sector?
Please, answer, comments.
I invite you to the discussion.
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of the importance of innovativeness and entrepreneurship in economic development are described in the publication:
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Thank you very much
Best wishes
Want to research on social entrepreneurship, any suggestions on a topic will be appreciated.
We need either a framework for analyzing KPI of innovations or a framework for analyzing best practices in the field of social entrepreneurship (but it can be any other related area).
Hi All,
My PhD research is on the role of social entrepreneurship in helping to sustain the cultural heritage. Apparently, I am stuck - social entrepreneurship and cultural heritage are two big topics.
Sometimes I find myself shifted towards social entrepreneurship and sometimes towards sustaining the cultural heritage. It is like, the more I read, the more confused I am.
My Chapter 1 focus more on the importance of cultural heritage and I barely discuss about social entrepreneurship (I know I should). There are limited reading materials on how social entrepreneurship could contribute positively in the effort of sustaining the cultural heritage. Chapter 2 was supposed to focus on social entrepreneurship, but whatever I wrote, I will find that nothing is making sense.
The longer I got stuck, the more demotivated I become :(
What kind of innovative start-ups are financed through crowdfunding?
Please reply
What would you see, regard, and define as the most lucrative, promising and rewarding entrepreneurship opportunities?
Would it be a) science-based, b) (emerging) technology based, c) radical innovation or mega-projects based, d) existing markets (restructuring and improving efficiency) based, or e) social entrepreneurship based?
Of these options, which would you deem as most promising and which would you deem as least promising?
Which types of kinds of entrepreneurs are therefore best positioned?
The entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship are some concepts which are worked through last years, so do you have any idea on those fields especially within women labor?
I want to examine the working status of cooperatives in Assam in organised and un organised sector and evaluate their performance as social entrepreneurship. And to see the potential CSR fund to avail for the cooperatives in rural areas. Can any body suggest me precise questionnaire and set of obsectives to be included?
Currently, higher education plays an important role in developing entrepreneurship among students. However, there are various didactic methods, thanks to which the entrepreneurship among students is stimulated and improved. What didactic methods are used to stimulate and develop entrepreneurship among students is conditioned by many factors related to the type, organization and functioning of a specific university, prevailing in the country standards of the teaching and higher education system, developed and implemented educational programs and financial resources, as well as a system of financial support for the development of innovative start-ups and other business ventures set up by students, the specificity of functioning and development of university incubators and accelerators of entrepreneurship and innovation.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What solutions are used in your country in your country?
How can teaching entrepreneurship and innovation be developed at universities?
How can incubators of entrepreneurship and innovation be developed at universities?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
Presently, I’m doing a research on social entrepreneurship. The main goal of my study is to analyse social entrepreneurship in socio-economic development. My SE research involved three levels of analysis (i.e., individual, organizational, institutional) using qualitative method. Kindly, please suggest me list of relevance item question for interview session.
Once you have the idea for an innovative startup, what are the barriers to setting up and developing innovative startups? Are these limited by the source of external financing? Is there no institutional support from the state? Is this related to the significance scale of the issue of activating entrepreneurship and innovation as an important part of pro-development economic policy?
Most startups after 1 - 2 years of functioning cease to function or announce financial bankruptcy and fall out of the market on which they operate. What are the main determinants that lead to this? Are they just wrong strategic decisions of the management of these business entities or other factors?
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What are the barriers to setting up and developing innovative startups?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
I conducted a qualitative study on entrepreneurship and sustainable growth. I'm looking for a tool to do a follow up quantitative study that measures the relationship between the entrepreneur's characteristics and growth. I'm looking for a validated tool that I could use (preferably free) in this study.
Does anyone know of a dataset with rates of social entrepreneurship by country that differentiates between domestic and international ventures? For example, a social ventures that sells products in Canada to provide funds for charitable giving in Vietnam would be an international social venture.
Activation of innovativeness and entrepreneurship of economic processes, especially in the field of stimulating the business activity of enterprises from the SME sector is the key issue of potential improvement of the economic growth rate of the country, increase in employment, production, investments, income, etc.
Activation of innovation and entrepreneurship of economic processes is also one of the key determinants of pro-development, counter-cyclical, interventionist economic policy.
In connection with the above, I am asking you the following question:
In your opinion, what are the most effective instruments for activating innovation and entrepreneurship in economic processes?
Please reply
Best wishes
I'm starting a project in this area covering poverty reduction, and I'm willing to know what is the current pertinent discussion.
many thanks in advance.
What instruments of activating innovation and entrepreneurship are used in your country and what is the effectiveness of using these instruments?
Are innovation and entrepreneurship significantly increasing in your country as a result of the application of specific instruments for activating innovation and entrepreneurship?
Effectively developed innovation and entrepreneurship should translate into improved growth and economic development.
Therefore, in many developed countries, the state develops programs to support entrepreneurship and innovation.
However, various instruments are used to activate innovation and entrepreneurship in individual countries.
In addition, taking into account the diversified level of economic development and the unequal conditions for the development of enterprises, the effectiveness of applying specific instruments for the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship in individual countries may also be uneven.
Has any of you conducted research in this area?
I am asking for links to scientific publications in which the results of research on the above issues have been presented.
Therefore, I am asking you the following questions:
What instruments of activating innovation and entrepreneurship are used in your country and what is the effectiveness of using these instruments?
Are innovation and entrepreneurship significantly increasing in your country as a result of the application of specific instruments for activating innovation and entrepreneurship?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
Barriers to the development of entrepreneurship and innovation can be many. In particular countries this issue looks different. For example, in some developing countries the main barrier is the lack of start-up financing programs from loan funds and public sector subsidies. while in some developed countries the main barriers include high labor costs, high taxes, high competition, etc. In order for the country to develop, in order to record high economic growth of a given economy, these barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation should be reduced, reduced and removed. In each country, certain small or large barriers to the development of entrepreneurship and innovation can be identified. if they are small or large it can also be a relative issue. In order to accurately diagnose them, it is necessary to carry out multi-criteria comparative analyzes in which, on the basis of precisely selected and developed measures, objective comparative studies of determinants of development and barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation of particular countries were carried out. Based on the results of these studies, it would be clear that barriers to entrepreneurship and innovation should first be reduced and removed. The issue of reducing these barriers is particularly important in today's emerging knowledge-based economies, in which the fourth technological revolution has already been diagnosed and identified as Industry 4.0. I do not think that at present there is no country where the high level of significance of this problem would not be recognized.
In view of the above, the current question is: Barriers to the development of entrepreneurship and innovation in current knowledge-based economies?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
Kelly Mix has shown that young children in urban US acquire elements of base-10 thinking as early as 3 years old. But would young children in African villages, where subsistence farming forms the basis of the economy, experience this effect? My own research suggests 'no' - but Mix's research suggests that there may be ways to prime such skills, especially through smartphones.
Are there research and development programs in your countries for cooperation between territorial self-governments and enterprises to activate entrepreneurship and innovation of business entities?
In recent years, cooperation programs of territorial self-governments with enterprises have been developed in some countries to activate entrepreneurship and innovativeness of business entities.
Because in developed countries information, innovations, new technologies and entrepreneurship are considered as one of the most important factors of the country's economic development and, as a consequence, also economic growth measured, for example, by the Gross Domestic Product in subsequent years.
In addition, research and research and implementation works are conducted in these themes, which further underline the high level of significance of innovation, new technologies and entrepreneurship in contemporary national economies.
In connection with the above, I would like to ask you the following question: Are there research and development programs in your countries for cooperation between territorial self-governments and enterprises to activate entrepreneurship and innovation of business entities?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
Hi all,
I'm thinking of using cognitive maps in my research on community-based social enterprises in rural areas. My research focuses on the way in which activities undertaken by community-based social enterprises are influenced by the (rural) context in which the organisations operate (and vice-versa).
I'm planning on conducting interviews with the different leading social entrepreneurial actors within different community-based social enterprises. I'm currently thinking about using cognitive maps during those interviews, to help get a better understanding of the way in which the social entrepreneurial actors perceive their environment. By this, I mean asking participants to draw the organisation and its environment on a piece of paper, as to make their conception explicit.
I'm looking for tips on how to use cognitive maps / drawings during an interview. Therefore, I wonder if you can help me with the following questions:
- Do you know any research that is illustrative of the usage of cognitive maps / drawings during interviews?
- Do you have experience using cognitive maps / drawings in qualitative research? If yes, what are tips and tricks that you can share?
Thanks for your help!
Kind regards, Mara
Hi all,
Who do you think is doing the most important social entrepreneurship leadership research? What theories & journals do you think are most relevant and creating the most insight. We are doing some work in the area, which we can share with you, and would like to hear your thoughts and also hear who you thinking we should be reading to deepen our understanding. Thanks.
Hello, I am Karen, I am starting my Phd in Business and Management sciences, and I am interested in do research about social entrepreneurship, I started with entrepreneurial ecosystems, but I would like to know If could be a good idea to put the both topics together, if not, I would be more aligned to the Social Entrepreneurship, if someone can help me to find gaps in this area, I would be so grateful, and I want to apply it for Mexico, but I am struggling about to which path follow, so if someone better informed about this topic can help me I would appreciate it.
Dear colleagues,
could you please recommend me any research about early-stage development of social enterprise?
Sincerely,
Audrone Urmanaviciene
Dear colleagues,
Do You have any suggestions what tools/ methods can be used to measure social impact and/or social performance of social firms?
Sincerely,
Audrone Urmanaviciene
Hi, I will do a qualitative research on the impact of social entrepreneurship on the empowerment of people with disabilities. I will conduct both semi structured interviews (first) and focus groups. There will be 18 interview participants (people with disabilities). However, I am not sure If I should invite different people to the focus groups?
Thank you.
In my quest for finding a scale for measuring social innovation, I have come across a social innovation attitude scale which was developed for students and RESINDEX i.e. regional social innovation index. Still I am looking for Social innovation scale. If anyone can help, I will be obliged.
Many thanks
I need inputs on business plan including how to make the village financially viable to support itself and enable people to stay in the same village using some economic activities.
How do you see the role of compassion in social entrepreneurship? Does it have a role in entrepreneurship? Are you familiar with work on compassion?
I am planning to start my research on social entrepreneurship marketing . As a potential tool, I am interested on social media. So far I am struggling to get journals, articles and thesis paper related to social media marketing of social enterprises.
Anyone wants to cite their 'social entrepreneurship' paper in a detailed review paper currently in progress? Please share your paper/link. Social entrepreneurship papers specifically on emerging economies are requested.
I am planning to start my research on social entrepreneurship marketing. As a potential tool, i am interested in social media. So far I am struggling to get journals, articles and thesis paper related to social media marketing of social enterprises.
In the Romanian rural area there is a high share of inactive people (four out of ten people in working age are inactive persons). People with low education and training levels, domestic women, long-term unemployed, elderly workers, people with disabilities, etc., have a high share among inactive people.What are good practices to support Social Entrepreneurship in Romanian Rural Areas?
Could EO affect entrepreneurial intention in university students?
I am conducting a research that connects Entrepreneurial Orientation and Entrepreneurial Intention. Please, some literature linking both constructs?
I need to find out how a theory can guide or inform practice in the business world and accounting. What issues are involved in translating theory into practice?
Entrepreneurship is opportunity based concept? However, export entrepreneurship could be different from the general entrepreneurship since it is out of the context.
Upananda
Sri Lanka
I am conducting my thesis and want to test the perception of Social Entrepreneurship in general population between different societal groups
I was involved in some early planning discussions about the arts entrepreneurship research lab. Please let me know if you're interested in collaborating further.
Some research has been conducted to try and correlate attachment style with ideological affiliation, while other research has correlated 'Big Five' dimensions with political orientation. My hunch is that attachment theory may provide some degree of explanation on the findings on the relationship between Big Five & political ideology. But how do I best combine Big Five, attachment theory, and political orientation into a coherent 4-year research effort (PhD)?
Preferably research on business or innovation management
I am looking for Scientist/Institutes, working on development of biosensors to guide and collaborate with us
Hello,
I would like to receive papers, dissertation on this subject. Related form of institution like community-based enterprise, social enterprise owned by the poor, etc are welcome.
Thanks
I am looking for researchers who would be willing to be collaborate for my current research on social entrepreneurship in terms of data collection, analysis, and paper writing. The geographical region of enquiry will be mainly Northern and Western India. Data collection will be by taking in-depth interviews within social enterprise organisations as well as with beneficiary rural households / micro entrepreneurs in select villages. To discuss more in detail, you can reach out to me. Those of us working on this project would need to be comfortable in speaking Hindi.
I am looking for research questions in the field of entrepreneurship
Social entrepreneur and social innovation? Theory of studying the phenomenon?
social impact on the societies in term of value added?
We are doing research on financing of agricultural activities from the perspective of lender and borrower. If anyone has recent publication on the same or related topic kindly send paper to: i.hawaldar@ku.edu.bh .
Basic Literature that define the concept 'local embeddedness' and Empirical studies on developing countries' FDI local embeddedness with clear methodologies.
Thanks
Social entrepreneurship outlines of particular interest.
I am thinking about doing research on ethos (morality) of entrepreneurship in some region in Poland. It would be great to make some comparison with similar researches and get to know the best matching methodology.
In the social entrepreneurship, the factors, gender, age, academic studies or some to support the seccessful enterprise
Dear all,
Before talking about Social Return on Investment (SROI) which is due to the whole operation of the social enterprise, let´s start by analyzing the first steps, the very first investments. My last questions in researchgate make me think about the action of social entrepreneurs and I received helpful comments about the question relating the participation of the poor in the process of social innovation. Now, this one is important for nascent social entrepreneurs and for the school of thought (EMES: enterprises owned by the poor, or social and solidarity-based enterprises,must innovate to reach the point of social entrepreneurs).
I mention Social Entrepreneurs to present the top-down approach; NGO and government fall into this group, so I welcome any paper about this fact and especially I would like to see some in depth analysis of the start-up process as suggested by:
- Gibb & Ritchie (Understanding the Process of Starting Small Businesses,1982): 1): Motivation & Determination, 2): Idea & Market, 3): Resource & 4): Ability;
- Helen Haugh: (Community-Led Social Venture Creation, 2007): (1) opportunity identification, (2) idea articulation, (3) idea ownership, (4) stakeholder mobilization, (5) opportunity exploitation, and (6) stakeholder reflection
Thank you
It is clear when social innovation gives step to novel idea, it can be transformed to goal, plan, program and project but what about this idea (Where, Who, When). Social innovation is one of the main and most promising way to rebuild community bonds, the poorest and marginalized people can benefit it when it is designed by an outsider (government, NGO, private enterprise, social entrepreneur), but the probability of success increase when the beneficiaries participate in the design of social innovation.
My question is related to remote rural area in developing countries, where live the poorest people. Probably they never had seen or heard about what is good living conditions or accepted as good. Many researchers (Mulgan, 2006; Von Jacobi et al, 2017) argue that the poor know about how to solve their problems; can we expect to this kind of poor to part of the process of social innovation? Or it is possible to talk about level of participation as the top-down approach does?
Following the logic of participation, it looks like a failure from the donors, NGO, government who make the plan and project and ask the poor to join them. Barlett (2007) is on the side to let the people plan for themselves. How could this happen when they lack skills,
Developing countries need SE to innovate, to change the society, but actions like that have some cost. To ensure the enterprise will exist in the future, social entrepreneurs must have financial return. Because new thing doesn´t exist in those countries, due to the government and market failure, SE can sell to the poor with higher cost. For this, it is argued that the logic of bottom of pyramid (BOP) had failed, and SE may fall in the same trap. Also by searching for financial sustainability social entrepreneurs enter in the so called "poverty penalty", a good review of the social dimension of the problems is needed. Then, I can ask:
Are social entrepreneurs getting richer by innovation and the desire to change? Can we talk about social entrepreneurship failure yet?
THANKS
I prefer this question could be the research direction of my dissertation for graduation. Is it logical and rational?
Here is the web of impact index of social enterprise in uk: https://se100.net/index/impact-measurement
Is it academic that I can use in my research?
p.s. Before this question, I considered to research how social enterprise can balance social performance and financial performance, however, I could't find a index to quantify social performance of social enterprise. If you have idea to quantify it, could you tell me? Thank you.
I am working on a questionnaire on altruism born of suffering (Vollhardt) as an antecedent to social entrepreneurship.