Science topic
Senses - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Senses, and find Senses experts.
Questions related to Senses
What is the probability that people can learn applied mathematics by noticing the mathematical and other senses of vocabulary? Why? How? My answer: high probability because many terms that are used in their sense outside of stereotypical and or pure mathematics are still applicable to the applied mathematical sense. Such as differentiate, integrate, etc.
Does it make sense to evaluate the "sensor delay" when we have simulated a PCF temperature sensor in 2-D (in Comsol software)?
Is there a certain formula to evaluate it?
Observe how even today linguistic empiricism via direct denotative reference and sense, via linguistic-analytic philosophies, reigns supreme in philosophy. It is superfluous here to cite how Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle, etc. have used the merely directly denotative sense to define sense, reference, proposition, truth value, and so forth.
The natural but extreme consequence from the Frege-Wittgenstein tendency is linguistic idealism, whereby somehow language and – for them consequently – even logic and mathematics (!) are made not only to define but also to determine the world. Berkeley would have done it better!
Justifiably enough from the necessary nature of derivation of linguistic idealism from direct linguistic and logical denotation, Richard Gaskin, a philosopher of language, aesthetics, and literature, has come upon this conclusion – presumably determined also by the necessity to bring aesthetic and literary worlds under the aegis of linguistic use and produce a language philosophy of aesthetic and literary experience.
But this motive would not suffice to posit linguistic idealism as a philosophical solution.
I modelling seepage analysis using SEEP/w and the result is XY gradient contour out of the phreatic line? And i think it's not make sense, so how i compute SF for boiling if the exit gradient computed by SEEP/w is wrong?
Every answer would be appreciated. Thanks before.
Experience is the food of the mind.
Research and observation is the existence of the universe.
Nothing is out there without the observer.
Fine if the universe exists without the observer. For whom does it exist? You can't cut the universe off from the observer. After all, that's why we're here, for the universe to exist. This universe out there outside our brain doesn't have the form that our brain presents to us. There is no light and colors without the eye, hearing without the ear, taste without the tongue, touch without the body. Outside of our brain there is only frequency energy that without the conversion of frequencies from our brain into something else none of this would exist. Without a brain we can't even perceive energy. We live in a matrix of our senses. We are the very nature of energy, which lives through us.
Okay, let's get to the hard part. Do you at least understand that the world we live in doesn't exist without your senses? So without us how can there be anything imaginary that our brain creates? Fine the frequencies exist, but who do they exist for?
What is it, and where does energy come from; which designs, constructs and moves frequencies molecules atoms everything? Is it God?
Sexologists appear to have lost sight of what science is about. They do not appreciate that before you can research a topic, you must first apply some common sense. There is nothing unscientific about basic facts and logic. Yet no one seems to see their relevance when it comes to understanding sexuality. In any science, the basic terms all need to be defined and understood. Preconceptions and assumptions need to be challenged. Yet sexologists have the same beliefs as the rest of the population.
Assessing the effect of GIS market mapping and marketing applications in enhancing market linkages for smallholder farmers.
It is very often that practitioners ask this question.
In reality there is not a 'best' method; probably it is better to ask about the 'most appropriate' method.
However, the most important aspect to consider is what the problem or scenario characteristics are, and from there choose the method, that best match them. It is just common sense.
It is easy to understand that a practitioner can apply a certain method
which is for instance the most used. However, if this method can't model a scenario as much close as possible, the result obtained is irrelevant and false, because it will be solving a problem that has no relation with the real scenario.
Based on the bold text, I developed a simple tool that can help the practitioner. It is not guarantee that the selected method replicates in full a certain scenario, but it will give the most close selection, and very important, gives as way to justify that selection
There are two parts labeled 300a and 300b. The first explains the procedure, while the second provides the tool in Excel for the practitioner to work, and without any calculation.
The additional advantage, is that the practitioner can make as many tests as wish, and that the characteristics for each scenario can be saved, and therefore it is easy to see in the future why a certain result was achieved
Kinetosis or motion sickness is mainly caused by a sensory conflict of different senses (e.g., the vestibular information about your movement does not match with the information from your eyes). But can it be caused by conflicting sensory information within one sense? For example, can different auditory information -- like a mismatch of frequencies (and their amplitude) and head related transfer functions -- cause sickness?
What are some of the different social settings in which second language acquisition can take place? In a general sense, how might research be different in these different settings? What are some problems you might foresee?
What is the relationship between faculty interactions, sense of belonging and academic stress?
This is the PowerPoint which I used on Saturday, 22nd April 2023 for my intervention at the 4th IACLSC Biennial International Conference-Exhibition, organised by the Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Law, KIIT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, on 21-22 April 2023. The PowerPoint does not contain extended analyses. I am going to write a text on some aspects of the Bhagavad Gita in which I will expose my interpretation. The PowerPoint contains some quotations from and observations on the Katha Upanishad too. A text of mine which investigates the passages of the Katha Upanishad quoted in the PowerPont will be published in some weeks. I am launching this discussion to see whether the participants have observations on the Bhagavad Gita or on the Katha Upanishad. I am deeply interested in the observations since I am still at the beginning of the study of the Bhagavad Gita and of the Katha Upanishad. In the texts which I will publish, I will expose my positions both on the Bhagavad Gita and on the Katha Upanishad. In the present context, my observations are rather limited.
In my inquiry on the Bhagavad Gita, I shall analyse some aspects of the transformation of the individual through and thanks to his process of knowing the structure of reality. Becoming aware of his nature and of his position in the reality is for the individual the first step towards his moral development: for the individual needs and ought to walk the road of becoming aware of his nature in order to be able to know the aspects of his person which he ought to improve and to know the aspects of his persons which he ought to correct. The intervention in the reality of Lord Krishna shows that individuals are morally not always morally self-sufficient; men are limited entities; in them, evil can prevail. The road of knowledge, of meditation and of education is a process of fighting against the evil tendencies of the individual.
I shall begin my inquiry with the description of the three Gunas in chapter XIV: the notions of Sattva, of Tamas and of Rajas, their properties and their influences on the individual will be the first passage of my exposition. Through the investigation on the three Gunas we shall be able to observe that any individual turns out to be a composed entity which, depending on his education, engagement and meditation, can tend to the prevalence of Tamas, or of Rajas or of Sattva: the direction of the individual’s development is, as such, not given; it depends on the characters which the individual decides to cultivate in himself. The responsibility of the development, therefore, is due to the individual. As we shall be able to see thanks to the Discourses, the road to intellectual and moral development is not easy: it is, on the contrary, long, complex and difficult.
The individual cannot avoid being a composed entity which, since the factors of which it consists are not in a condition of reciprocal harmony, is exposed to a conflict in itself: therefore, the individual must reckon with mutually incompatible influences in himself; nonetheless, the individual is responsible for the prevalence of one or the other of the factors. Knowledge is indispensable in order that Sattva, the positive factor in the individual, can be improved in the individual: beholding the Supreme proves to be the way of liberation from the yearning of the objects of the senses. Lust will emerge as the enemy of the correct knowledge: knowledge is the remedy against the influence of lust.
For my analysis, I shall concentrate in particular on Discourses II, III, IV, V, VI, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII.
Bibliography
Srinivasa Chari, S.M., The Philosophy of Bhagavadgītā. A Study based on the Evaluation of the Commentaries of Śaṁkara, Rāmānuja and Madhva, with a foreword of MM.V. Srivatsankacharya. New Delhi, 2005, reprinted 2014.
Desai, M., The Gospel of selfless action or The Gita according to Gandhi (Translation of the original in Gujarati, with an additional introduction and commentary). By Mahadev Desai. Ahmedabad, 1946.
The Bhagavad Gita. With Text, Translation, and Commentary in the Words of Sri Aurobindo. Edited by Parmeshwari Prasad Khetan, Jhunjhunu; Rajasthan, 333001, 1992.
The Bhagavad Gītā (Sanskrit Text, Transliteration, English Translation & Philological Notes). Introduction by W. Douglas P. Hill. Translated by John Davies. Delhi, 2006.
The Bhagavad Gita in English. The Sacred Song. Translated by Philippe L. De Coster, B.Th., D.D. Translated into English from the original Sanskrit into English along ancient manuscripts, and various other sources and research material. Split up reading – Transliteration Word for Word translation. Gita Satsang Ghent Centre (Belgium). Copyright (Belgium) 2006 – 2007. Revised and Enlarged, November 2010.
The Bhagavad Gita. The Original Sanskrit and An English Translation. Lars Martin Fosse. Woodstock NY, 2007.
The Bhagavad-Gita, or Song Celestial translated by Sir Edwin Arnold. The Harvard Classics, New York, 1909–1914. Downloaded from: https://www.bartleby.com/45/4
The Mahabarata. A Prose English Translation of the Mahabarata (Translated literally from the Original Sanskrit Text.) Adi Parva. Edited and Published by Manmatha Nath Dutt, M.A., M.R.A.S. Calcutta, 1895.
The Mahabarata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. Translated into English Prose from the Original Sanskrit Text by Kisari Mohan Ganguli [1883–1896]. Scanned at sacred-texts.com, 2003. Downloaded from: https://holybooks.com/the-mahabharata-of-vyasa-english-prose-translation/
Theodor, I., Exploring the Bhagavad Gītā. Philosophy, Structure and Meaning. Farnham, England / Burlington, USA, 2010.
According to M. Fountopoulou, the 21st century teacher needs powerful tools and techniques for developing and cultivating personal skills, which are both exciting and significantly relevant:
- connecting theory with practice, - medium and long-term view of learning and teaching
- evaluation of the information
- the transformation of knowledge, the - - - the management of the school unit
- the combined application of scientific and pedagogical principles
How many hidden elements compose the ultimate description? The empirics create a sense of "knowing" where cause and effect elicits what is real. #Energy-Resolution
Many people may think that an irrational such as 2^1/2 is mathematical, not physical, and has no direct connection to quantum mechanics (QM).
On the other hand, we guess that's a great question even though no one really knows the exact answer.
We offer the following:
For the interpretation of probabilities in QM to make sense, the wave function Ψ must satisfy certain conditions.
An extremely important and yet rarely mentioned condition is,
Ψ squared = Ψ* squared=Ψ.Ψ* must always be positive and real.
This is the required answer.
Matrix transition chains B (solving the heat diffusion/conduction equation as a function of time) suggests finding an adequate alternative complex transition matrix to solve the Schrödinger equation as a function of time.
what is quite striking is that 2^1/2 should appear explicitly and be expressed numerically as 1.142... in order to construct the required complex transition matrix.
Is there any bioassay for detecting/ evaluating dogs (or other animal) sense of humor?
I mean we are concerned more about how exactly does our brain function, which part is responsible for what kinds of actions and responses, but hardly do we consider the fact that life has sprouted from non-living things. And if you look at it, everything must be very either totally living and totally non-living. It's just that our senses make us feel alive. The fact that abstract matter has the ability to generate something as absurd as a memory is in itself a remarkable thing isn't it?
I would like to lead a scientific discussion around the "sustainable development in the construction sector" And I hope to have your reactions.
1. Why is sustainable development in the construction sector important?
2. What are geopolymer materials, and how do they compare to Portland cementitious materials from an environmental perspective?
3. How can natural fibers, such as bamboo and hemp, be used in geopolymer materials to improve their properties?
4. What are some factors that can affect the performance of natural fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites?
5. In your opinion, what are some areas for future research in this field?
We published an article in this sense, and I hope to have your reactions to this article. Here are the links to read this article.
I have a data set with several variables under socio-demographic factors. For example, age (under 25, between 25 to 34, between 35 to 44, 45 and above), education(No education, primary, secondary, and higher or diploma) and so on.
Now, I'm interested in checking the relationship of each of these different sub-variables with bed-net usage using (adjusted) odd ratios using Python. I have the codes already. But I want to verify if it makes sense, or theoretically correct if the sub-variables (under each head-variable can be grouped as independent variable against the outcome variable separately.
I'm new to the method. Relevant materials would also be much appreciated.
Thanks
#multilevelRegression #statistics # logisticRegression
I am investigating whether two independent factors with only two levels each affect my dependent variable memory performance. Thus, I performed a two way analysis where my IV1 was significant and the interaction between both IVs.
I am confused regarding post hoc tests as some state no post hoc tests are needed in case of only two levels. Others state that Tukey test should be performed. However, the Tukey does not seem to make sense in case of only two levels in each IV? I thought about doing an independent samples t test? But in this case only further investigate the main effects. Thus, my question is if my analysis requires a post hoc test and if so, which post hoc test would you suggest for the main effects and interaction effect?
Thanks!!
What I want to find out: Women with high levels of aggression, impulsivity and alexithymia have a lower sense of parental competence than men with high levels of aggression, impulsivity and alexithymia.
I have conducted an aggression, impulsivity , alexithymia and sense of parental competence questionnaire on my sample. Now I am strugglig on how to seperate the data so that I can only compare women with high impulsivity, alexithymia and agressivity scores with men with high impulsivity, alexithymia and agressivity scores and their respective parental sense of competence.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Hi,
I would like to know how I can order a siRNA (5 or 10 nm) for a protein(X) based on the following information that has been published:
" siRNA against X was synthesized from the following sequence: 5′- GTGATGTCCGGGTAACTCTA-3′".
I know companies have websites for custom siRNA design, shall I put the sequence as the sense Sequence that they ask? what are the best overhang Option?
Thank you,
Saeid
ResearchGate has a problem in the sense that it doesn't recognise Journals that are not in existence anymore.
Rest-Mass, Charge of an electron is still an unsolved problem in physics! Why?
Einstein: "A theory setting mass and charge a priori is incomplete!" So Dirac's Electron Theory (restmass and charge are fundamental constants) is incomplete in the sense of Einsteins Opinion. The same to SM & GR up to now?
I ask this question to explore the philosophical foundations and frameworks that underpin our understanding of history as a discipline. By delving into the philosophy of history, I aim to gain insight into the diverse perspectives and theories that scholars have developed to conceptualize and make sense of historical events, causality, and human agency. Understanding the various philosophical approaches to history will enable me to critically analyze and evaluate different historical narratives and interpretations, considering the underlying assumptions, biases, and epistemological frameworks that shape our understanding of the past. By engaging with the philosophy of history, I seek to deepen my understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of historical scholarship and enhance my ability to interpret and analyze historical phenomena within a broader intellectual context.
Can anyone describe when to use kV or keV when discussing electron microscopy? They seem to be used interchangeably, though it seems like it would make more sense to describe the actual energy of the primary electrons (keV) to me. Is the kV applied to the electron gun the same as the keV of the incident electrons?
Thanks!
"Bipolar disorder (formerly called manic-depressive illness or manic depression) is a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration. These shifts can make it difficult to carry out day-to-day tasks.
Is it possible to live a normal life with bipolar disorder?
In short, bipolar disorder may sound like a serious diagnosis, but with the right tools, supports and a commitment to be healthy, it is manageable for many. Not only can you live a normal life with bipolar disorder, you can lead a full and rewarding life." Ref: internet...
So many geniuses are bipolars such as Isaac Newton, Ernest Hemingway,Vincent Van Gogh etc as you can see further famous bipolars down below as listed in relevant Wiki...
Because it is difficult to define SUSTAINABILITY in scientific sense. I believe it is an art that when practised and fine tuned more will give better results. E.g. Art of singing when practised to perfection will lead to a sustainable singer.
Hello,
I recently stumbled on a paper in the field of neurosurgery. The paper analyzes imaging parameters that predict injury related to the spinal cord (Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injuries). I have two concerns related to the paper and I need assistance from a statistician
1) Is that possible that they mention that one parameter is associated with positive association (OR > 1) with PLC injury in axial section but not associated with PLC injury in sagittal section (OR < 1)? This didn't make sense because it is the same parameter but once viewed in axial view and another time viewed in sagittal view.
2) My second concern is that whether it is possible to use the parameter that was associated with negative association (OR < 1) to create ROC curve and measure its predictive power (sensitivity, specifity, etc)? This this didn't make sense again because how come that one parameter is associated with negative odds ratio can be used to predict the dependent variable and be used to create a cut-off value that predict this dependent variable?
Can you supply your results with references?
Thanks in advance.
What is the role of Interoceptive sense in Toilet training of individuals with Sensory Processing Disorder?
In segregating generations which type of heritability can be used?
And should one consider the poets who don’t rhyme their verses as being of an inferior mastery of the language compared to those who always rhymed their poetry without affecting the sense and the beauty of the poem such as Edgar Allan Poe?
The relationship between mental toughness and psychological fatigue in adolescent volleyball players: is the logical relationship between the three of stress perception correct, and does this study make sense?
Hi everyone,
I am new on this platform and I am doing a PhD on descendants of immigrants (2nd generation) in Switzerland. I am actually focusing on the concepts sense of belonging and identity formation.
I am adopting a qualitative approach and using a semi-structured interview guide. I am looking for some examples of open questions on those topics but usually the articles that I find relevants don't present their guides in the appendix.
Could anyone help me?
Thank you so much.
Valérie
Does it make sense to build a regression model for time series data with breaks? Like the time series I posted below with one major break that mark the shift of time series feature?
It seems that novelty seeking cannot explain a great part of the attraction of many to new things. A part of the attraction to new things comes also from some (strong) aversion felt toward oldness or repetitiousness.
Some people may dislike older things, even if those people are exposed to that "old" thing for the first time. For example, a movie that is made in the 1960s might look not-so-interesting to me, even if I am watching it for the very first time.
Just the aurora of oldness around some things suffices to create that sense of aversion.
Good morning,
I am not an expert on Factor Analysis, so I hope the explanation of my problem makes sense.
My current task is to perform analyses on an older data set from experiments my lab conducted a couple of years ago. We have 212 individual items, consisting of a dozen or so demographic questions and items from a total of 24 different scales that measure separate constructs. Given the large number of items and constructs, I would like to reduce the number of dimensions to achieve a more clear starting point for theory development. Obviously, an exploratory factor analysis is a good choice for this.
My question is whether I have to input the 200 or so individual non-demographic items in the EFA, or whether I can instead just use the 24 composite variables/constructs and reduce the number of dimensions from there. My hesitation using all the individual items is that an EFA would simply return something very similar to the composite variables, as the constructs generally have a quite high internal consistency and are fairly distinct from each other based on theory. The obvious caveat with using the composite variables is that it is not something I have seen done much, and as I am not an expert on EFA, I am unsure as to whether there is a major methodological road block to using composite variables that I am unaware of.
Thank you for your help!
Best wishes,
Pascal
When you make crosses between two lines of parent maize and you have F1 generation,how to make effective selection ? on the panicle how can you that this grain is a product of crossing and this other grain on the panicle is not a product of crossing?
Or in the other sense , when you make drosses between two parents ,do all the grains on the panicle parent are served or all the grains on the panicle of female plant are product of crossing? How to make selection of individuals on a panicle?
The relationship between scent, emotion, and memory is described in literature as "A Proustian Moment," after this passage from "In Search of Lost Time" , “… I carried to my lips a spoonful of the tea in which I had let soften a bit of madeleine. But at the very instant when the mouthful of tea mixed with cake crumbs touched my palate, I quivered, attentive to the extraordinary thing that was happening inside me.”
It's a sensory experience that triggers a rush of memories often long past, or even seemingly forgotten. For French author Marcel Proust, who penned the legendary lines in his 1913 novel, “À la recherche du temps perdu,” it was the soupçon of cake in tea that sent his mind reeling.
Ever since the 1991 publication in "Cell" of "A Novel Multigene Family May Encode Odorant Receptors: A Molecular Basis for Odor Recognition" by Linda Buck* and Richard Axel (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics tHoward Hughes Medical Institute College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York, New York 10032), Neuroscientists and Molecular Biologists have been working to answer this and other questions about our olfactory sense. Some say that it is responsible for our most powerful memories, often from childhood.
My general interest is in the mechanisms by which sense perceptions in humans become memory and how memories are retrieved.
I am working on UV-visible measuements of some powder samples (dark colored ones), the absorbance measurements gives us values higher than 1, which we think isn't logical, and when I try to calculate the Reflectance by the mean of this equation: R=1-sqrt(T.exp(A)), it gives me high values (up to 70% Reflectance) which are in contradiction with the high absorbance measured, assuming that the Trasmittance values that are under 25% are correct.
Should I go through some type of normalization for my absorbance values? or do i do the UV-Visble measurements again adding Barium Sultfate (BaSO4) to the samples?
In his ECPR essay (https://theloop.ecpr.eu/what-is-democracy-an-empirical-response-to-the-butterfly-collector/), Leonardo Morlino makes two statements that I'd like to highlight here.
(1) "[W]e are focusing on reconstructing the 'total texture' of democracy. What interests us, once we have collected all the material, is mapping and circumscribing the analytical space of the notion of democracy."
(2) "[I]f we privilege the empirical perspective, the 'total texture' (in our terms, the effective analytical space) is continuously changing in time and space. In a sense, it is the work of Sisyphus. We have to accept that the 'total texture' of democracy has been changing not only in space, from one geopolitical area to another, and often from one country to another. It has also changed in time; for example, from one decade to another."
In our forthcoming book, called The Sciences of the Democracies, many of us are exploring Morlino's analytic space. At the moment, we are terming it the "ethno-quantic domain". This domain, we argue, frames democracy knowledge as something that can be found across space, time, language, culture, and species.
Is there any "location" you would add to this list? In other words, where else can knowledge on democracy be found, be located?
How can the waves emitted from the human body be sensed?
I am wondering, what are your opinions/experiences on which temperature measures are most relevant for the distribution of plants and their vitality in general? Specifically, I am interested in the comparison between above-ground and below-ground temperatures in sense of monthly or annual means.
The essential difference is that below-ground temperatures (assessed by dataloggers buried, let's say, 10 cm deep in the soil), in comparison to above-ground temperatures, exhibit buffered extremes, narrower daily amplitude, and longer temperature inertia (it takes some time to warm up and to cool down). The question is, whether these properties are an advantage or a disadvantage when studying how temperature drives the distribution of plant species.
I am interested in any ideas, if you know of some relevant papers, please, share them. I am most interested in how this works in alpine environments but also anywhere else.
Has anyone any thoughts or are aware of any research when it comes to Intuition vs Sensing when it comes to entrepreneurs?
I have found, for example, The 16 personalities, which are based on Myers Briggs - (MBTI) which is an introspective self-report questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions
And I have found one (1) profile that they call The Entrepreneurial. ESTP - Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, and Prospecting - https://www.16personalities.com/
So, my Question is
-has any seen or being aware of any research about if entrepreneurs are or could be more of the Intuitive person or personality profile?
I.e., Extrovert/introvert, Intuitive, Think....etc.
This based on personality typology, e.g., - Sense perception, versus Intuition.
"Sensing" S and "Intuition" (N) are about how we gather information and which information we trust more strongly.
Sense perception: Perception of the world takes place directly via the five senses. The primary interest lies in the existing. Prefer information that is practical and concrete, i.e. here and now and what it means for something to remain as it is.
Intuition: Perception of the world takes place indirectly via the subconscious. The primary interest is in possibilities - what something could be or become. "What if...?" Prefers information that is theoretical and extensible, i.e. information that can change through a change of perspective.
Children’s songs tend to be lively and playful, but as we grow older we try to be more serious. It’s therefore important that we rekindle our childhood sense of fun, creativity, and play. Some songs have funny-sounding words, like “Aweemaway,” “Chim-Chim Cheree,” “Hinky Dinky Parlez Vous,” “Polly Wolly Doodle,” “Shipoopi,” or the “Oompa Loompa” song from The Wizard of Oz. Some of these funny words relate to real-world sounds. If you turn on the motor of a really old car, it might sound like “Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang,” “Pop Goes the Weasel,” or “Seventy-Six Trombones.” Examples of songs that are for exercise and require physical activity include “If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands,” or “You put your left foot in; you put your left foot out; you put your left foot in and shake it all about” or “The Hokey Pokey,” The “Beer Barrel Polka,” and “My Hat / It Has / Three Corners.” There are also creative songs designed for learning languages, like “Alouette,” “Frère Jacques,” and “Sur le Pont D ’Avignon.” Some playful and creative songs demonstrate linguistic principles, like the assimilation of “Mairzy Doats,” or Gilbert and Sullivan’s patter “Major General Song.” A contrast of feminine rhyme with masculine rhyme can be seen in “Hennesy Tennesy Tootles the Flute” in “Me Name is McNamara; I’m the Leader of the Band.” Visual imagery is demonstrated in “Camptown Races,” and “Would you Like to Swing on a Star.” In Monty Python’s Spamalot there is a parody song entitled “The Song that Goes Like This.”
on a Star, and Yankee Doodle Dandy.
I'm using a SYTOX deep red stain to count live/dead cells in a flow cytometry experiment. For my positive control, I use cells killed with ethanol and stained with SYTOX. When I initially look at my data for my experimental samples (healthy cells or treated cells that are under stress, i. e. should have a larger dead population), I do see two clear populations for live or dead cells, and there is a larger dead population with the treated cells than healthy, which makes sense.
However, when I go to analyze my data and blind gate out what should be the "negative" population from the unstained cells, there is consistently a very large shift in my negative SYTOX population so that a large portion of it then falls on the positive side of the gate, even though I can clearly still see the two distinct cell populations, where the dead population, which should be SYTOX positive, matches up well with the positive SYTOX control. It's just that the population that should the SYTOX negative is now split in half by the blind gating and thus makes my results ambiguous.
I've tried optimizing my machine settings/voltage to ameliorate the intensity of the shift but no luck so far. I've been using the suggested manufacturers concentration, so my next step would be to do a titer and decrease the SYTOX concentration that I stain with, but has anyone experienced this issue with SYTOX in flow cytometry and have any suggestions for troubleshooting other than changing the staining concentration and incubation time? My cells are live, not fixed, and I analyze them immediately upon completing the staining.
Is it me or are most studies terribly written. Unless they are published in the Lancet or Nature. Most do not make sense
I'm extracting some data from an older paper and I've run into some units that are, to me, a little obscure. At first I thought I had it figured out. Its nutrient data reported in y/mL (with the y being a 'gamma' symbol). After looking into it I found some information suggesting that gamma is equivalent to a microgram. Data reported in micrograms per mililiter made sense for what I was looking at and I moved on.
I have gotten to a new table in the paper with measurements reproted in my/ml (again, it is a 'gamma' not a y but I'm not sure how to insert the correct symbol here). If my previous assumption is correct then that means that this measurement is somehow milli-micrograms/milliter? I'm a little perplexed because I don't see that making sense.
Is anyone here familiar with these units?
Children’s songs tend to be lively and playful, but as we grow older we try to be more serious. It’s therefore important that we rekindle our childhood sense of fun, creativity, and play. Some songs have funny-sounding words, like “Aweemaway,” “Chim-Chim Cheree,” “Hinky Dinky Parlez Vous,” “Polly Wolly Doodle,” “Shipoopi,” or the “Oompa Loompa” song from The Wizard of Oz. Some of these funny words relate to real-world sounds. If you turn on the motor of a really old car, it might sound like “Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang,” “Pop Goes the Weasel,” or “Seventy-Six Trombones.” Examples of songs that are for exercise and require physical activity include “If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands,” or “You put your left foot in; you put your left foot out; you put your left foot in and shake it all about” or “The Hokey Pokey,” The “Beer Barrel Polka,” and “My Hat / It Has / Three Corners.” There are also creative songs designed for learning languages, like “Alouette,” “Frère Jacques,” and “Sur le Pont D ’Avignon.” Some playful and creative songs demonstrate linguistic principles, like the assimilation of “Mairzy Doats,” or Gilbert and Sullivan’s patter “Major General Song.” A contrast of feminine rhyme with masculine rhyme can be seen in “Hennesy Tennesy Tootles the Flute” in “Me Name is McNamara; I’m the Leader of the Band.” Visual imagery is demonstrated in “Camptown Races,” and “Would you Like to Swing on a Star.” In Monty Python’s Spamalot there is a parody song entitled “The Song that Goes Like This.”
on a Star, and Yankee Doodle Dandy.
Respected colleague,
This question does not seek answers in the sense that both competence and loyalty are important.
For example: imagine you own a company and have two candidates for CEO. One is competent, but you know he / she is not loyal. You trust others, but you know that he / she is not competent.
If you had to decide between them, which one would you choose?
Rationalism distinguishes between empirical knowledge, i.e., knowledge that arises through experience, and a priori knowledge, i.e., knowledge that is prior to experience and that arises through reason. Empirical knowledge depends upon our senses, senses that, the rationalist wastes no time to demonstrate, are unreliable. Here the rationalist appeals to common sense deceptions and perceptual illusions.
Empiricism denies the rationalist distinction between empirical and a priori knowledge. All knowledge, the empiricist argues, arises through, and is reducible to, sense perception. Thus, there is no knowledge that arises through reason alone. Thus, empiricism credo is that where there is (or can be) no experience there is (and can be) no knowledge.
Thanks in advance.
Irrational numbers are uncomputable with probability one. In that sense, numerical, they do not belong to nature. Animals cannot calculate it, nor humans, nor machines.
But algebra can deal with irrational numbers. Algebra deals with unknowns and indeterminates, exactly.
This would mean that a simple bee or fish can do algebra? No, this means, given the simple expression of their brains, that a higher entity is able to command them to do algebra. The same for humans and machines. We must be able also to do quantum computing, and beyond, also that way.
Thus, no one (animals, humans, extraterrestrials in the NASA search, and machines) is limited by their expressions, and all obey a higher entity, commanding through a network from the top down -- which entity we call God, and Jesus called Father.
This means that God holds all the dice. That also means that we can learn by mimicking nature. Even a wasp can teach us the medicinal properties of a passion fruit flower to lower aggression. Animals, no surprise, can self-medicate, knowing no biology or chemistry.
There is, then, no “personal” sense of algebra. It just is a combination of arithmetic operations.There is no “algebra in my sense” -- there is only one sense, the one mathematical sense that has made sense physically, for ages. I do not feel free to change it, and did not.
But we can reveal new facets of it. In that, we have already revealed several exact algebraic expressions for irrational numbers. Of course, the task is not even enumerable, but it is worth compiling, for the weary traveler. Any suggestions are welcome.
When the outcome variable is binary/dichotomous (yes/no), does it make sense to report in terms of means and standard deviations?
Regards.
At the point we have reached in taxonomy and systematics today, it seems that we are in a situation where details and extremes (in the popular sense) ignore the basics (in the classical sense). Therefore, in a popular sense, we seem to be in a situation (especially by amateur researchers) in which many researchers publish articles without adequate knowledge of the scientific foundations, or even if they do, ignoring these foundations. From this point of view, I think that we should remember the scientific foundations again and know what and how the studies serve.
In this sense, what is taxonomy iessentially and clearly? From what need and how did it arise? What is its main subject and approach? And again, what is systematic essentially and clearly? From what need and how did it arise? What is its main subject and approach?
I think these questions should be answered clearly.
Can a systematic study be done without knowing the taxonomy and a taxonomic study without knowing the systematics? Concisely and clearly, what is a taxonomic study and what does it encompass? What and how does it serve? Also concisely and clearly, what is a systematic study and what does it encompass? What and how does it serve?
I would appreciate if you could share your valuable ideas...
As a core idea of gradient boosting problems is related with functional gradient descent algorithm and the solution implies iterative addition of a new model that learns on previous pseudo residuals, then probably it makes sense to transfer somehow the problem into the ordinary equation form (or even, in PDE if it possible formally). The are 2 questions? Does it make sense? Were there any efforts to test this approach? Thank in advance!
I need citations from other websites where the information was found.
Dear all,
I was wondering whether usage-based linguistics (in its broadest sense) had been experimented with in the Content and Language Integrated Learning classroom.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Eloy Romero Muñoz
Hi, I'm working on a social theory of clumsy and clumsiness. I have the sense it is an unrrated phenomenon of some importance in social life.
I look forward to clues, references & more. Thank you!
I'm working on adaptive thermal comfort (CIBSE TM52 / TM59). Calculating the running mean temperature using the formula Trm= 0.2Te(d-1) + 0.16Te(d-2) + 0.128Te(d-3) ... is giving me values for Trm significantly lower than the previous daily averages (Te(d-1), Te(d-2) etc).
From the formula this makes sense as we're adding 0.2 + 0.16 + 0.128 etc which is significantly less than 1.
But intuitively, this doesn't make sense. Shouldn't the running mean temperature be much closer to the previous few days' mean temperatures?
Hi,
I needed to know how many total papers are published in Researchgate with the term "sense of place" as a title, or part of a title.
Hi!
I'm currently working on a Data Science project for optimizing the prices of the products one of the biggest supermarket chains in Mexico.
One of the things that we are working on, is finding the price elasticity of demand of such products. What we usually do, is that, apart from fitting an XGBoost model for predicting sales, we fit a linear regression, and we get the elasticity from the coefficient corresponding to the price (the slope).
However, it is abvious that linear regression is sometimes a poor fit for the data, not to mention that the execution times are way longer since it requires to run separately XGBoost and LR (which is not good considering that there are thousands of products to model).
Because of this, it ocurred to me that we could use numerical differentiation for finding the price elasticity. At last, calculating a numerical derivative is way faster than fitting another model.
However, I'm not sure if this is mathematically correct, since the data does not come from a function.
So the question would be, is this mathematically correct? Does it make sense?
I am using 3-time series data and after testing for unit root for each variable, the results show that at a level all of them are non-stationary the first difference leads to stationary. Therefore, three variables are integrated in order (1). So, I applied the cointegration test, the results I got for both the Trace and Max tests are below:
- None: fail to reject the null hypothesis
- at most 1: fail to reject the null hypothesis
- at most 2: reject the null hypothesis
How can I make sense of these? I understood that in the "none" case, there is no cointegration. However, I am still confused at the "at most 1" and "at most 2" cases. Please help me with this. Thank you!
Where are independent higher education research centres specialising in TRUE Orthodox Christianity, not to be confused with Orthodox Christianity ? True Orthodox Christianity rejects the modernism with its roots in the Russian and earlier Revolutions, including the paracanonical (canonically impermissible) calendar reforms promulgated by incomplete Robber Synods starting with the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the 1920s and the genocide of True (aka Authentic, Genuine or Catacomb) Orthodox Christianity by modernist Orthodox Christianity, resulting ultimately in the response of the True Orthodox Christian 1983 Anathema against Ecumenism by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) aka Russian Orthodox Church in Exile (ROCIE), embraced by all True, Authentic, Genuine and Catacomb Orthodox Christians. The True Orthodox genocide is numerically by far the greatest Christian martyrdom ever, with tens of millions in the former Russian Empire alone (a large majority of the 110 million "The Economist" estimates were murdered by the Soviet regime alone), was triggered by the refusal of the World Council of Churches, meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, to allow a Greek True Orthodox bishop to speak about this matter, though the New York Times published his proposed address. In response the anathema was promulgated, in English, the WCC official language, at the ROCOR Synodical meeting at their monastery in Mansonville, Québec, also in Canada. Despite making up between 1 and 10% of the Orthodox Christian populations, in the broad sense of the term, throughout the world, I have been, even as an interested True Orthodox Christian, been unable to find any state recognised study centres devoted to the study of True Orthodox Christianity, as opposed to Orthodox Christianity. Some institutions, such as Cambridge University's Institute of Orthodox Christian Studies claim to have all locally active Orthodox Synods represented on their governing bodies, but didn't respond to my request for the publicly available details of the True Orthodox Christian Synods represented there. In any event, that Institute is not an Institute of TRUE Orthodox Christian studies.
Hello,
I am trying to find research that has used participants that have gone through a program and interviewed them after they have finished the program(when they are older) instead of interviewing them when they are in the program. Hope that makes sense, let me know.
Batch is showing good expression of proteins, but is contaminated with fungus. Does sterile filtration makes sense after harvest of that batch? What might be the best way to purify proteins from that culture without having any issue.
I used gmx mdmat in gromacs to create contact maps, but I am unable to make sense of the outputs I've got from the same.
Could anyone point me in the right direction?
This is an attempt to simulate the behavior of a membrane protein embedded in a lipid bilyer.
I'm attaching the files.
Any help or comments about the attached files would be appreciated immensely..
Thanks in advance..
It is a common sense that there must be only one theory which can describe the entire universe. But we also know Quantum mechanics & Theory of Relativity are not compatible with each other. Isn’t is sufficient to say that either both theories are wrong (minimal chance) or are approximation of the same theory (stronger candidate)? Why we are not trying to write a theory from the scratch which may be compatible with both?
I analyze my data using Excel solver tool to fit my calculated values to experimental values. The set objective is the correlation value of the 2 sets of data and the variables are four different parameter values from my data. I am still not satisfied with the sigmoidal fits I get, though the final data solution makes some sense. Is there any other nonlinear fitting tools I can use which can give me more accurate sigmoidal (two-states protein unfolding) fits?
I have this insconscient feeling that a publication whithout a DOI is automatically viewed as less reliable, though I think it is not as it seems. Do you think it makes sense? How would you reflect about this?