Science topic

Scientific Publishing - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Scientific Publishing, and find Scientific Publishing experts.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
1 answer
Reimagining Scientific Publishing: Your Voice Matters! We want to hear from researchers like you! Share your thoughts on current scientific publishing and what changes you believe are needed. Your answers will remain anonymous unless you choose to provide identifying information in open-ended responses. Link to the survey: https://wsu.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bf7yG0U7H3rqZo2
Relevant answer
Answer
Good survey. Not long. Important topic.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
1 answer
How can Big Data Analytics and Data Science, supported by generative artificial intelligence technology, support conducting scientific research and publishing its results?
In the age of digitalisation, where science generates unprecedented amounts of data, big data analytics and data science, supported by generative artificial intelligence, are becoming key tools to support the research process. They enable researchers not only to process and analyse this data effectively, but also to discover hidden patterns and trends that would be inaccessible using traditional methods. Thanks to machine learning algorithms, researchers can identify complex relationships, formulate new hypotheses and generate innovative theories, which significantly accelerates scientific progress. Generative artificial intelligence, which is capable of creating new content based on existing data, opens up new possibilities for automating analysis, generating hypotheses and supporting the publication of research results, allowing scientists to focus on interpreting and formulating conclusions. However, to fully utilise the potential of these technologies, it is necessary to continuously develop methodologies and algorithms, as well as to consider the ethical aspects of their application, which emphasises the key role of scientific research in this field.
The research and observations that I conduct show that artificial intelligence technology has been developing rapidly in recent years and is finding new applications, with new opportunities and threats emerging. I have described the main determinants, including the potential opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technology, in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
I have described the issue of Industry 4.0/5.0 technology applications, including Big Data Analytics, with the aim of improving data and information transfer and processing systems, in the following articles:
THE QUESTION OF THE SECURITY OF FACILITATING, COLLECTING AND PROCESSING INFORMATION IN DATA BASES OF SOCIAL NETWORKING
IMPORTANCE AND SECURITY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE INTERNET IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC ENTITIES IN POLAND
APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANISATION
The postpandemic reality and the security of information technologies ICT, Big Data, Industry 4.0, social media portals and the Internet
The Big Data technologies as an important factor of electronic data processing and the development of computerised analytical platforms, Business Intelligence
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this matter?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
I invite you to scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Relevant answer
Cuando la información es tan grande y precisa y se tiene un IA que lo puede relacionar entonces el error es mínimo y util
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
The scientific publishing industry is facing several significant challenges today:
  1. Sustainability of the Subscription-Based Model
  2. Open Access and Funding Mandates:
  3. Peer Review Challenges
  4. Predatory Journals and Questionable Practice
Relevant answer
Answer
Nick Wise on Generative AI in Publishing
"My personal opinions on generative AI are that it is a tool that can be used competently or incompetently, for good or bad. It can do things that other tools have been able to do for years that we have no problem with: search, translation, grammar and spell checking, etc. It can also generate entire papers, along with hallucinating references to texts that do not exist and creating anatomically implausible diagrams.
There is no point banning the use of generative AI as there is no way to tell for sure that something is AI-generated. Even if we could say for certain that some content was the output of a generative AI, an author could say that they had used the AI for spell checking, or some other acceptable task. I think that all publishers can do is ask people to use AI responsibly. Pandora’s box is already open."
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
We invite researchers in Islamic, Jewish, Christian, and Abrahamic finance to submit chapter proposals for the upcoming book, “Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Abrahamic Finance.”
Submission Deadline: January 29th, 2025
Submit chapter proposals at: Call for Chapters: Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Abrahamic Finance | IGI Global Scientific Publishing
Contact at: paldi16@gmail.com
Relevant answer
Answer
Paul Kuei-chi Tseng Do you want to submit a chapter proposal for this book? If so, please email me at paldi16@gmail.com. Thanks!
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
12 answers
Ecosystem Services (Elsevier) is open to receive proposals for new innovative Special Issues. Ecosystem Services is a high rank journal, among the 15 best in environmental sciences (6.1 impact factor 2023), ranked Q1. Our position gives high visibility to the articles we publish.
Special Issues are articles collections (12 or more) that share well-defined, scientifically innovative and coherent aims and scope. For an overview of present and past SI please visit the journal's webpage.
If you are interested in proposing an appealing and high-quality topic for a special issue in Ecosystem Services journal, please send to me a one-page description of the SI aims and scope, including the team of guest editors (3-5). We will carefully assess the proposal in terms of scientific quality and aims and scope. The scope has to be clear around a framing conceptual outlining that gathers together an article collection with sufficient coherence.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Relevant answer
Answer
The 'microalgal community in soil ecosystems' presents an excellent topic for a special issue in the journal. Despite their significant contributions to ecosystem services, algae are often undervalued. Algae from extreme environments are recognized for their unique metabolites, which are highly sought after in industry. Given that soil can serve as an extreme environment for algae, exploring the diversity of these organisms in various soils could offer valuable industrial applications. Therefore, the special issue of microalgae in soils can include research on diversity, ecology, and economic applications of soil algae.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
16 answers
Many journals have implemented a soft policy against the use of generative AI, such as Chat-GPT, and now require authors to disclose the use of AI in assisting with manuscript writing. This policy distinguishes from the use of tools like Grammarly Generative AI for syntax improvement and extends to cases where AI is used even for doing and writing formal analysis.
Experienced journal editors can typically identify AI-generated content, as it often lacks coherence with the rest of the manuscript. In my view, this emerging issue needs to be addressed promptly and decisively.
I believe that AI "assisted" research writing should be considered unethical and prohibited in the scientific community, with measures put in place to prevent its use in total. Allowing this trend to persist could have detrimental effects on scientific research in the long term. IMO, It takes out all the human creativity, intuition, personality and fun in writing science research papers.
However, I'm open to hearing different perspectives on this matter.
Relevant answer
Answer
There is no such thing as Artificial Intelligence, or AI as some call it. In order to build such intelligence, you need consciousness, and no amount of software can build that. Once again, for those who have the extra time to read
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
9 answers
SDGs = UN' Sustainable Development Goals
HEI = Higher Education Institutions
If any relation is detected, you should specify which these are and how they work or must be working. You can give any ideas to optimize this processes or actions.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mr. Rocco!
You made valid points to consider. Open science is not "open" enough as knowledge is considered a commodity to pay for. This is reflected in research collaborations:
Quote: "Open science is the science ahead. Open science in the digital era is ‘transparent and accessible knowledge that is shared and developed through collaborative networks’ (Vicente-Saez and Martinez-Fuentes 2018: 434)." in Ruben Vicente-Saez, Robin Gustafsson, Clara Martinez-Fuentes, Opening up science for a sustainable world: An expansive normative structure of open science in the digital era, Science and Public Policy, Volume 48, Issue 6, December 2021, Pages 799–813, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab049, Open access:
Camilla Tetley, Susanne Koch, Narratives of research collaboration for sustainability at the global science-policy interface: A vehicle for inequality or transformation?, Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 155, 2024,
Yours sincerely, Bulcsu Szekely
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
Dear colleagues and fellow scientific researchers,
We would like to invite you to publish your next paper in our upcoming issues of DYSONA – Applied Science (ISSN: 2708-6283).
Main subjects:
  • Agriculture
  • Applied environmental sciences
  • Engineering and Technology
  • Food science
Publication fees: Free of charge
Time from submission to publication: Average 4 weeks (depending on peer review/revision process)
Indexing and abstracting: The journal is not yet included in Scopus or WoS. However, the journal is index in AGRIS (FAO), Google Scholar, FSTA, ROAD, ZDB and many more scientific repositories
We welcome your questions here and for more information, kindly contact us at: dysona@e-namtila.com
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for sharing publicly. The journal seems to be promising.
Wishing you every success in your task.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
I have a question regarding the review process for journal submissions. When we submit an article to a journal, is it illegal for a reviewer to provide authors with a list of their own articles and request that these articles be cited in the manuscript? I understand that this practice is certainly unethical, but I am curious about its legality.
In the situations I am referring to, the articles suggested for citation are entirely unrelated to the manuscript under review. Reviewers often claim that their final decision on the acceptance of a manuscript does not depend on whether the authors cite their articles, stating that these suggestions are optional.
However, I have spoken with several authors in my country who recognize that this practice is unethical. They feel pressured to comply with these requests because their papers have already been under review for several months, and they fear the risk of rejection or further delay if the journal has to find new reviewers to replace the previous ones.
I appreciate your insights on this matter.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
Preprint servers play a valuable role in the scientific publishing workflow by accelerating the sharing of research, promoting openness and transparency, and diversifying the publication landscape. As the scientific community continues to evolve, the role of preprint servers will likely continue to be an important and dynamic aspect of the scholarly communication ecosystem.
Relevant answer
Answer
Роль серверов препринтов возрастает с каждым днем. Она уже сегодня способствует динамичности обмена научных результатов.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
1 answer
The choice between open-access and subscription-based publishing models involves weighing the trade-offs between accessibility, sustainability, quality, and the evolving landscape of scholarly communication. Institutions, funders, and researchers must carefully consider their priorities and the broader implications for the scientific publishing ecosystem.
Relevant answer
Answer
Публикации с открытым доступом дают возможность получить мнения широкой профессиональной аудитории
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
6 answers
Guys here is partial list of JCR (Web of Science) Impact Factor.
Title: Factors Contributing to the Decline of Journal Impact Factors
Abstract: The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Impact Factor is a widely recognized metric used to evaluate the influence and prestige of scientific journals. However, in recent years, there has been a noticeable decline in the impact factors of many journals indexed in the Web of Science’s JCR database. Causes can be
  1. Evolving Publication Landscape: The scientific publishing landscape has undergone significant transformations in recent years. The rise of open access publishing, preprint servers, and alternative metrics has led to a diversification of research dissemination channels. As a result, traditional subscription-based journals may face increased competition, leading to a redistribution of citations across different platforms.
  2. Field-Specific Trends: Impact factors can vary significantly across different scientific disciplines due to variations in publication practices, citation patterns, and research culture. Changes in funding priorities or emerging research areas may result in shifts in citation patterns, impacting the impact factors of certain journals.
  3. Quality vs. Quantity: The pressure to publish more articles within shorter timeframes can lead to an increase in the overall number of publications. While this can enhance scientific output, it may also dilute the impact factors of individual journals if the focus shifts from quality to quantity.
  4. Citational Behavior: Changes in the way researchers cite literature can affect impact factors. The increasing use of self-citations and the concentration of citations towards a limited number of highly influential papers can impact the overall citation metrics of journals.
  5. Editorial Practices and Policies: The editorial policies and practices of journals can influence their impact factors. Factors such as rigorous peer review, editorial selectivity, and adherence to ethical publishing standards can attract high-quality submissions and subsequently increase impact factors.
Conclusion: The decline in the impact factors of journals listed in the JCR database can be attributed to a combination of factors related to evolving publication practices, field-specific trends, citational behavior, and editorial practices. Understanding these factors is crucial for researchers, publishers, and other stakeholders to interpret impact factors accurately and make informed decisions regarding journal selection and evaluation.
Further research and analysis are needed to delve deeper into the dynamics of impact factors and explore potential strategies for maintaining the quality and relevance of journals in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape.
The attachment contains List of impact Factors 2024.
Relevant answer
Answer
Wonder if it is because of the Covid-related articles which caused a spike in IF in the last 2 years. Now it just started to normalize to the pre-pandemic value.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
Dear Colleagues,
Peer-review isn't working well, and it needs an overhaul. In the time of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and remote work, it doesn't make sense to wait for months just to receive few lines rejecting an excellent manuscript or accepting a poor one!
Would you spend five minutes to answer a questionnaire on Google forms, and help SCIENEUM.io solve this problem for all of us?
Are you one of us? https://youtu.be/ewOuhohAjWc
Write your comment below!
Relevant answer
Answer
Done, participated ! Good video Khalid M. Saqr
Reminded me to:
I. Bentov human evolution.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
Dear all,
I would like to share with you publishing opportunities in our journal, Ecosystem Services, a Q1 journal, with an impact factor 2023 of 7.6, according to the 2023 Journal Citations Report and 12.5 CitiScore (SCOPUS). We have currently 3 Special Issues (SI) open for submissions:
Payments for Ecosystem Services and Motivations: exploring the driving conditions for success or failure.
Innovative governance of ecosystem services: from hierarchical to collaborative models and from single instrument to “blended” approaches.
Ecosystem services towards planning healthy and resilient landscapes
The scope and full information can be found here:
Regards
Luis
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
10 answers
Recently I visited <https://research.com/> (R) (a platform that lists top scientists around the world from the areas of computer science and electronics) and later I also visited <https://atlas.cern/> (A) (the ATLAS Experiment at CERN). I made the following observations (I intentionally don't mention names):
1. One of the top authors at R has published 1,816 papers.
If one's professional career lasts 40 years, the calculation says:
40 years X 365 days = 14600 days; 14600 / 1816 = 8 days to publish a paper
That means 1 paper is published every 8 days during the entire professional life! That's about 45 papers a year... every year!
2. The same author at R has an h-index of 167.
"The h-index is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given author/journal has published at least h papers that have each been cited at least h times."
The R's top author has 167 papers each one cited 167 times!
3. A paper published by A's researchers had 78 authors!
I realize that CERN is something "big" and quite complex. But... there are 78 authors anyway...
Probably all those people are high-level scientists. But... what makes them hyperprolific? Is it real? How is it possible? Is it more for the benefit of science or is it a kind of business?
What's your opinion?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mega-authorship implications: How many scientists can fit into one cell?
"The past 20 years has seen a significant increase in articles with 500 or more authors. This increase has presented problems in terms of determining true authorship versus other types of contribution, issues with database metadata and data output, and publication length. Using items with 500+ authors deemed as mega-author titles, a total of 5,533 mega-author items were identified using InCites. Metadata about the items was then gathered from Web of Science and Scopus. Close examination of these items found that the vast majority of these covered physics topics, with medicine a far distant second place and only minor representation from other science fields...
Some solutions are offered for the problems resulting from this phenomenon..."
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
Is it a good idea to send pre-submission inquiries to multiple journals to accelerate the publication process? or do we have to wait for the editors' response to a pre-sub before sending another one?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
I think it depends on what is your pre-submission enquiry like. Is it very short or very long? If it is very short, they are more likely to respond. If it is a whole article, most editors are discouraged if it is too long like that because they might have lots of other work, unfortunately.
It also depends a lot on which journal and editor. Some will have time. Others might be too busy.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
1 answer
Greetings fellow researchers,
We have researched the Frankl theory, which suggests that subscribing to nihilism can lead to experiencing existential vacuum (Man's Search for Meaning, p.111). Furthermore, we have studied how this phenomenon poses a threat to psychotherapy (). We have investigated how internet usage and existential nihilism affect the experience of existential vacuum.
As we have decided to take this research further for publication, I would like to gather your insights on selecting appropriate journals, approaching them, how the university affiliation can help, the ethical process, and whether we can take assistance from a guide or the university. We appreciate any additional insights or experiences you may have on the topic.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Vinod, publication in any field, let alone Psychology, is not an exact science. While we would like to believe that the publication process is completely bias-free and accessible for everyone, the reality is that there is a definite learning curve.
Both publications and the publishers (Journals, Books, etc.) vary in terms of their quality, acceptance rate, aims and scopes, and charges. This makes navigating this landscape possibly overwhelming, especially for a student. I know I was when I began, and even now, I would not say that I know all the ins and outs.
So, here is what I suggest.
1. Be a part of a good research team: The most success I have gotten in terms of publication has been as a part of teams (or research bubbles) on various topics. I can say that working with these teams has taught me about topics I wouldn't have come across otherwise.
2. Browse through journals: This is advice that I have given to my master's students, who are looking to publish as well. Look through recent publications in your areas of interest and see what journals they have used. Look at them; look at other similar ones, which might be easier to access. Go through their aims and scopes etc, and you will find the right one for you.
3. Take risks: You won't get any publications from not sending papers to journals. Rejection is a part of the process, and the reviewer's comments will generally improve the papers.
4. Talk to people: You are doing that already, so keep doing it. But make sure that your researchgate connections translate in real life, and you develop professional contacts as well.
I think this is enough for a brief idea, but, I am always looking for driven, inspiring people to work with, maybe we can connect further?
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
Remark_1: a PDF of this draft has been added to this discussion to allow the readers to have access to the hyperlinks.
Remark_2: this discussion is aimed at drawing attention to the seriousness of the current man-made global warming in which science has much to do in order to avoid the uncertainty spreading.
Last November 17 and 18 a very concerning fact took place for the first time in modern recorded history. The global surface air temperature exceeded in 2-degree Celsius the pre-industrial average temperature taken between 1850-1900 prior to extensive and widespread use of fossil fuels. Despite scientists assure that the observed exceeding, that happened for a limited number of days, does not mean that the Paris Agreement targets are already compromised, it is urgent and mandatory to keep a precautionary tracking of the atmosphere to dilucidated if a threshold is gaining momentum pushing the atmosphere to start working around the 2-degree Celsius atmospheric overheating, and becoming the main feature of the anthropogenic climate warming within the next ten years.
What happened last November 17 is a serious issue that cannot be overlooked nor discarded by the irresponsible "optimism" which tells things will get better because of technology-based fairy-tales, and by the institutional denialism that exist around the seriousness of the human-sparked global warming and all that has to do with its speed (or if you prefer, its rate of advancement). For those reasons, a conservative perspective will not be helpful keeping in mind the last twenty years trends in CO2 global emissions.
As expected, COP 28 was unable to leave behind its 1.5-degree Celsius goal as nothing serious is taking place with regards how fast the human-boosted warming is going to exceed the 2-degree Celsius above pre-industrial average.
Almost in parallel, the tipping points narrative has been warning humans cannot exceed the 1.5-degree Celsius, despite it is being also said that humans are "near climate tipping points". The bad news is humans still have not developed the hard models and measurements to obtain an accurate metrics of who far humans are to reach that tipping points. Furthermore, the "tipping points" discourse is too vague, and it is becoming another meaningless concept that too many in the world talk about, without having yet available any measurable parameters nor a quantifiable perception of those potential thresholds.
For decades it has been told that remote sensing and all that comes from Earth Observation (EO) systems would help to achieve a sustainable path while planning for a sustainable development (SD), and for a tough future under severe climate strikes. Tonnes of papers using satellite-provided data have been published and, no doubt of it, will keep a high rate of publishing being, so far, unable to show evidence of an overall improvement of the global situation as human dynamics seems unstoppable.
Despite the lack of a decisive global and integrative climate action will persist as one of the main features and drivers of the international system in the near term, to start thinking about implementing a global coverage alert system to inform globally when and how often the global mean Earth temperature gets closer or exceeds the 2-degree Celsius above pre-industrial average. That alert system should also have a straightforward design to display the information to obtain trends (the speed of atmospheric overheating is crucial) and frequency of that events.
That alert system should be very "sonorous". It does mean it should, among other means and devices, reach the cell phones of the people in a similar way as, for instance, earthquakes alarm systems work. In few words, each time the global mean temperature gets closer and/or exceeds the 2-degree Celsius above pre-industrial average people must know.
To make concrete progresses concerning the sense of urgency and the situational awareness among global citizens, to end with the self-deceiving attitude that can be witnessed not only in rich but middle income and poor countries too. The warming is being faster than predicted and expected. Humans lost this war twenty years ago when it was, finally, accepted that the warming was faster the previously accepted. Unfortunately, despite the huge amount of data, and the quantity of satellites orbiting Earth, it is rather an impossible task yet to provide any measure of that speed and nor agree on how humans should measure that rate of change.
It is time to end the over discussing time and get serious. It is quite advisable to carry out a sustained observing effort on what is going on in Brazil and in the middle of the Amazonia, while following the situation over there all along the summer 2023 in the Southern Hemisphere. It is important to be able to know how many times it could happen during the next six months.
It is also advisable that science make its best effort in avoiding publishing papers that provide grounds for time ambiguity. It should be a mandatory attitude to be quite clear in validating the scope and conclusions of any paper in concrete time-frames. To leave the door open for speculation regarding the timing that can be inferred from those publications exerts a very negative impact in all that pertain to figure out the right time scales for climate action globally speaking.
An explicit acknowledgment of what version, the weak or the strong, of the sustainable development (SD) concept is being framed as the main analytical tool is a complementary publishing strategy that could be of great assistance when evaluating the reach and strength of the conclusions. It is worth mentioning that the “weak” version has been adopted for so long and can be the explanatory root for the aggregate failure of both, to accomplish higher levels of sustainability and give shape to the urgent human collective self-restrain to ameliorate the response to the climate and ecological crisis.
Science is not free of being submitted to any governance regime which should be vigilant of the undesired and counterproductive effects of scientific papers on the political process that, regrettably, took the control of all that concerns to the climate discussion, and the institutions designed to institutionalize a, supposedly thought, collective action.
The bottom line is nineteen years have been lost. In December 2015 it was projected the world would reach the 1.5-degree Celsius by March 2045. Reassessed estimations are suggesting the world risk breaching that benchmark by February 2034.
Remark_3: as always I am willing to build network capabilities aimed at publishing papers with policy-implications, participate in workshop, and/or find the paths for setting the structure of a good well-funded research project.
Relevant answer
Answer
Alexander Kolker I imagine that the Daily mean absolute temperature was calculated from the hourly values by summing them and dividing by 24. The annual average surface air temperatures were calculated by summing the daily temperature and dividing by 365 or 366 for leap years.
What are the serious implications that this answer produces?
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
13 answers
Dear colleagues,
As you know 15.11.2023 ResearchGate announced its partnership with MDPI (https://www.researchgate.net/press-newsroom/researchgate-and-mdpi-partner-to-boost-the-visibility-of-open-access-journals-through-journal-home). MDPI is known by its very questionable practices (there are many discussions about MDPI here, on RG +there is a good analysis by Paolo Crosetto https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/ and also a fresh preprint about general problems with scientific publishing involving this publisher https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.15884.pdf) and at least in my opinion, it should not be promoted publicly.
Such a partnership poses a danger to Good Scientific Practices (GSP) and legitimizes questionable approaches especially those related to scientific publishing, and peer review. Besides all, there is also an ethical issue that should not be ignored.
At the same time, RG was a relatively good platform for exchanging and discussing research. It was helpful for me for networking and other science-related activities. And it seems that there is no good alternative to it at the moment.
That is why I would like to know whether you plan to stay there, leave this platform, or take any other actions.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
MDPI is just number four in line after similar partnerships with Wiley, American Psychological Association and Taylor & Francis. Today November 21st there is the announcement of number five with the open access publisher Pensoft see for details https://www.researchgate.net/press
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
As a regular user of ResearchGate, I'm disappointed by their decision to favor MDPI journals over numerous society journals (https://twitter.com/ResearchGate/status/1724759715358351423). Like many others, I'm considering deleting my account unless this unwise decision is reconsidered. What are your thoughts on this matter?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for your feedback, Wolfgang. But, the new agreement with MDPI publishing is quite different from others in two key aspects: (1) it promises "enhanced presence on ResearchGate" for MPDI journals which means not just permission, but making the papers from these journals more visible, and (2) MDPI's questionable activities, bordering on predatory, distinguish this publisher from others such as Wiley or Nature Springer. To me, this decision feeds on the global unfair publishing system that increases inequity among scientists from wealthy and poor countries. I had thought that one of ResearchGate's missions was to reduce this inequity.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
12 answers
My manuscript was accepted in an Elsevier journal on Sep. 26, 2018. The corrected proof is available online since Oct. 5, 2018 but I haven't received the final version yet. At the same time, I see more recent publications that are available as final versions. What could be the reasons?
Relevant answer
Answer
It might have to do with editorial policies
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
Please advise resources where you can search for dissertations using keywords. We need sites where you can choose the type of scientific work (article, dissertation, etc.). Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use ResearchGate to search for specific types of research papers; other popular resources include Google Scholar (scholar.google.com) for finding research papers and ProQuest (proquest.com) for dissertations and theses.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
I have a confusion in the results of some sanger sequence reactions for IBDV viruses.
the sequence reactions fail to give any reads or give non specific, bad quality and short fragments, although the PCR of those reactions are strongly positive and the sequenced samples was positive for both classic and vvIBDV by real time PCR.
could this failure be related to the mixed infection in samples or quasispecies phenomena?
I am in bad need to find out the scientific causes of these results supported with scientific published papers.
thanks for help
Relevant answer
Answer
thanks dr. Sabine for your replay
I am putting your recommended web sites in my mind, and taking them as guides for my research
thanks indeed for your attention
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
3 answers
Dear researchers
I get invitation from Universe Scientific Publishing Pte. Ltd. I check the website there is no indexed and the journal is still in early stage of creation. I check the publisher on net whether predatory or not however there is no information. Do you have any suggestion?
Thank you
Teguh
Relevant answer
Answer
The journal “Clean Energy Science and Technology (CEST)” (https://cae.usp-pl.com/index.php/cest ) is (although they try to hide this) indeed published by “Universe Scientific Publishers”, this publisher is listed in the Beall’s list of potential predatory publishers (https://beallslist.net ). This is a red flag and there are more:
Using the contact info mentioned in the CEST journal you end up with USP and “Academic Publishing Pte Ltd” https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/CAI/about/contact another dubious name
-Looking at the CEST journal they proudly mention Prof. Enrico Drioli, but despite the photo of a young(er) version, he is already more than 80 years old (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/membranes/special_issues/drioli_80 )
-According to he used to be editorial board member of a journal from Scientific & Academic Publishing Co. USA (a publisher mentioned in the Beall’s list) and is currently an editorial board member of “International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sciences and Engineering Technology” and mentioned in the stand-alone version of the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net/standalone-journals/ ) and a journal published by Scientific Research Publishing again a publisher listed in the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net )
Although nowadays some players in the scientific publishing world becoming better and better in presenting themselves misleadingly professionally, I personally would void this one.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
21 answers
What is a helpful tactic for evaluating the quality of your academic writing from the perspective of the reader? and what are the main elements to be assessed while proofreading your final draft?
Relevant answer
Answer
There are several tools and resources available to help evaluate the quality of academic writing. While these tools cannot replace human judgment, they can provide insights and feedback on various aspects of your writing. Here are some tools commonly used for evaluating the quality of academic writing:
  1. Turnitin: Turnitin (https://www.turnitin.com/) is a plagiarism detection tool widely used by educational institutions. It compares your writing against a vast database of academic content to identify potential instances of plagiarism. It also provides a similarity score that indicates the percentage of text matching other sources.
  2. Grammarly: Grammarly (https://www.grammarly.com/) offers more than just grammar and spelling checks. It can help identify issues related to clarity, sentence structure, vocabulary usage, and style. It provides suggestions for improvement to make your writing more polished and professional.
  3. Hemingway Editor: Hemingway Editor (http://www.hemingwayapp.com/) analyzes your writing for readability, highlighting complex sentences, excessive adverbs, and other areas that may hinder comprehension. It assigns a readability score and suggests ways to simplify and improve the clarity of your writing.
  4. Readability Tools: Readability tools, such as the Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test or the Gunning Fog Index, provide objective measures of the readability and complexity of your writing. These tools calculate scores based on factors like sentence length and vocabulary difficulty, helping you assess the accessibility of your content.
  5. Peer Review: Engaging in peer review with trusted colleagues or subject matter experts can provide valuable feedback on the quality of your academic writing. Peers can offer insights on the clarity of your arguments, structure, logical flow, and adherence to academic conventions.
  6. Academic Writing Guides and Style Manuals: Consult reputable academic writing guides and style manuals specific to your field or discipline. Examples include the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS), or the Modern Language Association (MLA) Handbook. These resources provide guidelines on formatting, citations, and overall writing standards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Exciting news for researchers and academics! Leading academic publishers like #Elsevier and #Cambridge University Press have announced that researchers can use applications like #𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 for academic writing, provided that the work is original. This means that texts created using tools like #𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 and Bing can be used to accelerate the process of scientific and academic publishing, but cannot be included as authors or contributors in the publication. This is an important step forward in reconciling the role of global publishing and research with modern technological advancements. Learn more about this implicit statement on the publishers' official website in the editorial policies and scientific publishing page.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you, Dr Rateb Jabbar - very interesting development. Do you think other large publishers will take a similar approach? Will they make the same type of announcement? Do you think this is the right way forward?
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
Hello,
I am a long-time user of R, but I basically always do the same thing… Generate an « ugly » table of descriptive statistics with summaryBy and doing ANOVA, post-hoc tests, etc.
I recently discover R Markdown and got really existed with its great potential to create nice statistical reports and more.
I have attached a screenshot of a simplified kind of raw data I usually produce in my research and the type of table I eventually publish.
I search the web for R code to produce the second table on my screenshot, but I did not find exactly what I was looking for.
Does someone is the Research Gate could help me?
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
It is possible to create the table as shown in ss. Here is one package which is capable to do this . https://github.com/arminstroebel/atable
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
3 answers
With the volatility of the scientific publishing world these days, what should a PhD graduate do when he/she discovers that his/her hard earned and meticulous scientific findings that was published in a journal for which he was awarded his doctorate and possibly awarded a grant for, and was included in CVs that landed him/her a job suddenly disappears overnight alongside the publishing company could not being found?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Jia Bainga Kangbai It would help if you tell which paper and publisher you refer to.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
Research trends are in many cases impacted by the gate-keeper's attitude or approval of a prospective research paper. The majority of those gate-keepers are specialized chief editors, editors, and reviewing-scholars in their fields.
Is it justified that a research paper gets rejected based on the criteria of being/not being fashionable or popular in the field?
Would you go with the current in order to get pass, or would you rather be concerned with saying your word in the field? Supposing that there are evidences for both the popular and the "not fashionable attitude nowadays".
I'm in the humanities, researching American poetry.
Thanks for your comments!
Relevant answer
Answer
I would tend to agree with Zahraa Taher Essa that unfortunately we have to conform with current trends before we embark on something more adventurous and possibly less in keeping with that which is fashionable and saying, as you say, "your word". I understand this might mean a more unorthodox and less accepted set of thinking.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
Hello researchers,
I'm interested in working on research about the language barrier as the first reason for scientific isolation in publishing globally. If you are interested to take part in this research from the side of your native language, please contact me.
Please recommend this to interested colleagues.
Best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Researcher.
As you added the reason is apparent and that is "the language barrier" does not your question also contain the solutions? which comes to one's mind is learning a language or languages?
Also you may find the works of "Subbiah Arunachalam" a distinguished and long established researcher useful. Among his published works this chapter is more related
SCIENCE ON THE PERIPHERY: BRIDGING THE INFORMATION DIVIDE
from
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
2005 Springer
Best Regards
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Hello,
Aside from Beall's List of Predatory Journals and Publishers, are there other lists of the same content? For example, World Scientific Publishing Company is not on the list of Beall, but how to know if this publisher is predatory?
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ma.Kresna Navarro-Mansueto In addition to the replies of Wolfgang R. Dick and Rodney Duffett which might help you to answer your question in general, I can say that the particular publisher you mentioned is discussed here on RG already: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_World_Scientific_Publishing_a_reputed_and_reliable_one
Not being included in the Beall's list can be a reassuring sign but in the given you can find some of the arguments why this particular publisher is not predatory.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
In many of these serious journals authors should pay for publishing (more than in pirate journals) and process of acceptance is unreasonably too long and too formalistic. I found a lot of very good papers (high quality and scientific) published in pirate journals. In some of serious journals engineering approach and practical use are neglected. The most important criterion for the paper acceptance is using of any new statistical method and/or model (in recent time especially machine learning). Remember Klemeš and his papers: Dilettantism in hydrology: Transition or destiny?; Political pressures in water resources management – do they influence predictions? etc.
Relevant answer
Answer
In my humble opinion, the biggest problem is a quite big period from the submission till the first decision. How it is solved in many ''so-called'' predatory journals? Simple. Reviewers are obtaining the vouchers for their review for every quick review, i.e. within 1 week. Of course, the review has to be done rigorously. But professor Bonacci is right - it depends mostly on the editorial and a reviewer.
You can find a not-so ''high-impact'' paper in journals with a high IF, while in ''predatory'' journals you can find a very quality paper.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
With the advances in community review and Web3 on the horizon, I've been starting to wonder if the way in which traditional peer-review works is outdated. Have y'all found any systems out there that feel like the future of peer-review?
Relevant answer
Answer
That is the matter of reality. We have to face it. In recent years the number of retractions in journals, even top journals has increased.
Even when an article had been retracted many years ago, other authors were or are still citing them as a part of their literature review. For example lets have a look at this paper:
  • "Regression of human metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumor cell–dendritic cell hybrids" published in: Nature Medicine volume 6, pages332–336 (2000).
But in this URL we find the retraction note
Retraction date is sept 2003.
But a Google Scholar search shows, it has been cited 59 times, by different researchers, from 2018 up to now. Now let's ask ourselves where were/are peer reviewers? (in such a case)
After start of Covid 19 a "Paper Rush" began, every one wanted to be the first or among the first ones to have it in his field of teaching, expertise. So now there are a huge number of retracted papers just on Covid 19.
The problem so tense, some researchers addressed it in this article with a term "PAPERDEMIC" to attract concerns
  • "COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”" DOI 10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754
and then among too many other articles about the problems with peer review, these two articles by the New York Times:
  • "Two Huge Covid-19 Studies Are Retracted After Scientists Sound Alarms"
and this one
"The Pandemic Claims New Victims: Prestigious Medical Journals: Two major study retractions in one month have left researchers wondering if the peer review process is broken"
  • When we follow the cases of retractions in different journals, the role of whistleblowers is great. Now they have become gatekeepers of science . So it is a kind of "Post peer review" that is of great help. I firmly believe peer review in scientific research is gatekeeper of our health, life, nature, future and other good things, but we need new methods, as far as I have been thinking about and testing, post peer review could be a valuable option. Let me quote a sentence from the above mentioned article. "The truth is that the “scientific research has changed the world” but now, and more than ever, “it needs to change itself” (Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, 2020) DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
223 answers
Many Academician and researchers think that number, quality and citation does not matter. But another school of thought relates quality of a paper to number of citation. What can be some successful strategies to increase the number of citations?
Relevant answer
Prof. Naveed Ahmad: My own rule that I apply to myself says:
You should increase the citation count as much as you could; it is a good indicator for yourself as a researcher and for your research paper!
On the other hand, ResearchGate (RG) is a platform and a gateway for sharing information and experiences between scientists, experts, researchers, and practitioners. In reality, RG is one of the biggest social media networks for the scientific community.
RG is an interactive app for people of all ethnicities, sexual identities, and different backgrounds. Slowly but surely the academia and the "real journals" will realize that the world is not going to wait for them to change. The world will continue to change and if they do not keep up with it then they will become irrelevant and obsolete. That is why platforms such as RG are the best places to present your ideas.
Therefore, RG is your way to increase your research visibility and, in turn, your citations.
Based on this, your research work should be open-access and free to all people unless there is a crucial need. This can be done during the addition process of any research work or publications by choosing "add a public file" instead of "add a private file".
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
31 answers
The Dolos list has started to work well, but I do not think this opposition to predatory publishing is enough. From what I have seen, there is no collective or institute (consisting of researchers) of reference that denounces this sector. It could be a collective whose objective would be to establish regular reports and publish statements about this sector. The collective aspect would give more weight to this opposition. For the moment, I have the impression that these are mostly isolated actions from researchers. What do you think about this idea ?
I just have to warn you of one thing: A researcher who publicly opposes this sector would have to assume unpleasant consequences. For my part, a few days after launching the Dolos list, I was already receiving threatening messages.
Best regards,
Alexandre.
Relevant answer
Answer
Researchers based at Russian institutions are more likely to publish in predatory journals if their university leader already does so, according to new analysis.
The authors of the study, analysed the work of 1386 rectors – the most senior officials at Russian universities – over a 10-year period and found that 149 officials had published in journals classified as potentially predatory in another study. What’s more, the rectors found to have been publishing in predatory journals had been doing so for an average of eight years, the study found...
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
11 answers
(Edited)
World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd is a Singapore-based publishing company that has been in the business since 1981. They publish a lot of edited books each year. How well accepted are those books in academia? Are they peer-reviewed?
Relevant answer
Answer
One little correction, the publisher “World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd” is not China-based, their headquarter is in Singapore. Hans-Georg Petersen can you give some examples of the sources that mention this publisher as potential predatory? I was unable to find anything substantial, they are not mentioned in the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net ).To answer the question it is good to know that they publish both journals and books.
Scopus indexing is some indication of the legitimacy and reputation of their journals. The majority of their journals are indexed in Scopus (see enclosed file).
An indication of the legitimacy and reputation of a book publisher can be found here: http://wokinfo.com/mbl/ when you search for “world scientific pub” you get 704 hits (comparable to IGI Global with 797 hits). Of course, a publisher like Springer gives more hits, but that is largely explained by being bigger and because of their long tradition in (book) publishing.
Another indication about the reasonably good reputation of this publisher (and their journals) is the fact that they are a level 1 publisher (like Elsevier, Springer Nature, etc.) according to “Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers” (https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside ).
So, overall I would say that they are not as reputable as Springer, CRC press, Taylor & Francis etc. when it comes to book publishing but it is a pretty safe choice.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
10 answers
We've all been in circumstances when we couldn't find the literature we were looking for. Other times, we found exactly what we wanted, but very late. Thus, beginners in research are pushed to formulate a clear and innovative title. Keywords rescue us, but, is it enough?
In these days of data mining, what tools can we utilize to structure our research paper titles such that they are search engine optimized (SEO)? How can we write technical titles that are both engaging and readable?
1. Google Trends
Track changes in word usage over time, within a region, etc.
2. Web-of-Science
Regular keyword literature search, to find jargon usage.
3. Semrush
Helps with Keyword Research, Competitive Research, PR, etc. It is a marketing tool, perhaps used by industrial researchers and product developers?
4. What am I missing? What are your tricks and tips?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Just use a simple description of your study, including your question, who performed the process, effects, and location . For example, my paper: 'Size-based fruit selection by a keystone avian frugivore and effects on seed viability in New Zealand' :)
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
12 answers
I have personally experience that its relatively tough to publish in a good journal in social science, for example let us suppose in the field of finance, marketing and so on. In comparison i have seen that in natural sciences the publication chances and frequency are higher. What are the possible reasons for this? 
Relevant answer
Answer
The ideological interest factor is greater in social science than in natural science.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
I have been asked to submit a paper on a special issue of Genes- MDPI. The impact factor of the journal is showing to be 3.4 but I saw conflicting articles about the MDPI journals being a predatory one. Though the editor of the issue is a reputed person in the field, I am bit confused about the journal in general. What are your thoughts?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think this is a complicated question. I did a quick search and found the IF to be even higher (1) than the figure you quoted. That means that journal is cited a lot, if that's useful to you. But, as we know, and has been discussed in other parts of this platform, IF is not the only factor to consider. There are many other metrics used.
Personally, I would not be able to afford the amount of the fees that they charge so publishing in that journal would never be an option for me.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
I recently read a recent publication, that was well done experimentally, results and discussion were excellent, but the abstract contained facts, that were not results of this study, they contrasted the results of the study. It was possible to make a list and put sentences in the abstract against the corrsponding part of the main part and the discussion and to see to difference. The main author did not answer to my question about it.
How is this possible ? Can Abstracts be changed after the review process und go to print without a check ? Or do you think, something like this may have been overseen by referees.
In Germany it is possible to send such findings to a DFG commision.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is really strange that there is a mismatch between the contents of Abstract and the same of the Text. In fact, Abstract is written after the paper is complete and finalized. The Abstract must essentially represent the contents of the paper and cannot be independent from the Text. It is a serious lapse on the part of authors, Reviewers and Editors.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
3 answers
Dear community,
this seems to have been out there since 2018 in medical sciences, but I only stumbled over it recently:
T&F are offering extremely fast review and publication times for a higher fee, they pay reviewers for handing in reviews in time. How do you feel about this? Will this bias acceptance of papers and just be a new way to buy a publication? Or do you think this is the right incentive for reviewers and a way to recognize the importance of fast and constructive review?
I would be interested in your opinion.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr Daniela E. Winkler, I am not sure this is meant to compensate their reviewers, perhaps as a surcharge to take care of other clerical purposes and indexing. T & F is known to reward their reviewers through APC reduction and by allowing them to read their subscribed journals freely.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Differentiating Science from Pseudoscience is becoming a challenge at so many levels these days. How can we separate the two and acknowledge a grey area in between?
Relevant answer
Answer
The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience gives a rather good overview about the distinction between science and pseudoscience, about indicators of possible pseudoscience, and about the resons for it. For a discussion of the reasons, see also https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_explanation_for_the_appearance_of_some_people_who_believe_that_the_earth_is_not_round_and_that_man_has_not_reached_the_moon.
See also these discussions about astrology - for me as an astronomer it is hard to believe how many scientists believe in it:
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
6 answers
Hi everyone,
I am about to define an experiment where we want to investigate 10 - 20 de novo small proteins. We are mainly interested in affinity but also want to show that proteins are folding properly. For that we are thinking about using circular dichroism. I am having seconds thoughts though if this is the right method in the long run. When it comes to publishing, I have the gut feeling that reviewers might ask for a crystal structure of the protein or even the complex. I am working on getting an impression myself by reading nature and science papers but I would like to get to know your advice and experience concerning the matter. What methods are best suited to give our research credibility that might be expected in high impact journals?
cheers
Martin
Relevant answer
Answer
If your protein fulfills a measurable function (e.g., enzymatic activity), then you can take the presence of that activity as proof of folding. To measure the stability of that structure, I'd try differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which measures the change in heat capacity during (un)folding. Integration then gives the average change of enthalpy ΔH between two temperatures. Proteins unfold (and ideally refold) cooperatively over a narrow temperature or [denaturant] range.
If you have several related proteins, you can use the protein engineering method (10.1351/pac199163020187) to associate ΔΔG with sequence changes.
It is also possible to plot the rates of (un)folding as function of temperature and/or [denaturant] (chevron-plot, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.013), stopped-flow CD would be nice for that.
A transverse [denaturant] gradient can be used to measure unfolding by electrophoresis (10.1016/0022-2836(79)90279-1), amide deuterium exchange is used to measure their accessibility by ESI-MS or NMR. Some bound fluorescent dyes (e.g., ANS) change their intensity during unfolding, sometimes this can be done also with intrinsic Trp residues.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Does anyone have experience with Columbus Publishers?
trustworthy or predatory journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
This publisher is new (and certainly too new to be mentioned in for example the Beall’s list (if they turn out to be predatory). I do see some red flags:
-Location is suspect, Google the address and you end up with some pretty nice-looking real estate but a highly unlikely location for an office
-I noticed in literally the first paper that this publisher is not sharp in copyright permissions of images, this is a red flag for the lack of proper peer review and use of well-established scientific standards
-The photo used on their homepage is probably not original since it is already used here https://professionals.hartstichting.nl/samenwerking-en-financiering/samenwerking/talentontwikkeling
-They are new so consequently non-established but still they a membership with ridiculous prices https://www.columbuspublishers.com/membership
-The APC’s are way too high for a basically non-indexed journal https://www.columbuspublishers.com/journal/research-journal-of-gastroenterology-and-hepatology?submenu=article-process-feefor a research/review article they charge 1499 USD
-The journals I checked are empty (no papers and no board members…)
Even if this might turn out to be a genuine and legit initiative I would go for another journal. Looking at your publication list you found way better one’s than this new player.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
As a researcher, I suffer a lot from the dilemma of global research cooperation, and since I am mainly from a poor African country, and I have no research support and I rely in my research on the laboratory capabilities available in the workplace, I face great difficulties in front of scientific publishing, in which I waste a lot of time and effort..
While research cooperation spawns scientific papers and innovations like the village of ants and at frequent intervals because each member of the group has a small and specific task!
So far I have failed to find a serious research group that suits me and would like to share with me, what are the possible reasons??
Relevant answer
Answer
Please have look on our(Eminent Biosciences (EMBS)) collaborations.. and let me know if interested to associate with us
Our recent publications In collaborations with industries and academia in India and world wide.
EMBS publication In association with Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33397265/
EMBS publication In association with Moscow State University , Russia. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32967475/
EMBS publication In association with Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology,, Mount Sinai Health System, Manhattan, NY, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199918
EMBS publication In association with University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30457050
EMBS publication In association with Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852211
EMBS publication In association with ICMR- NIN(National Institute of Nutrition), Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23030611
EMBS publication In association with University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth MN 55811 USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852211
EMBS publication In association with University of Yaounde I, PO Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950335
EMBS publication In association with Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693065
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31210847/
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080, Leioa, Spain. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852204
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Publication Link: http://www.eurekaselect.com/135585
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and NIPER , Hyderabad, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29053759
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950335
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad , India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472910
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and C.S.I.R – CRISAT, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237676
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Karpagam academy of higher education, Eachinary, Coimbatore , Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237672
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Ballets Olaeta Kalea, 4, 48014 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199918
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Hyderabad - 500 016, Telangana, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472910
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Panangad-682 506, Cochin, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27964704
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and CODEWEL Nireekshana-ACET, Hyderabad, Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770024
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore-641046, Tamilnadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919211
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and LPU University, Phagwara, Punjab, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030499
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Department of Bioinformatics, Kerala University, Kerala. Publication Link: http://www.eurekaselect.com/135585
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Gandhi Medical College and Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad 500 038, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450915
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and National College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirapalli, 620 001 Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266485
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of Calicut - 673635, Kerala, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23030611
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and NIPER, Hyderabad, India. ) Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29053759
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University), Lucknow-226 003, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25579575
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, India Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25579569
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Safi center for scientific research, Malappuram, Kerala, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237672
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Dept of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25248957
EMBS publication In association with Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229292
Sincerely,
Dr. Anuraj Nayarisseri
Principal Scientist & Director,
Eminent Biosciences.
Mob :+91 97522 95342
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
13 answers
Hi all,
I have submitted a paper for publication in June 2017 and I am wondering how long people generally wait? I submitted to a relatively small journal, Impact Factor ~ 1, and waited over 8 months for my first response from them (while their home page says it is generally 185 days ~ 6 months). I emailed them a couple of times during the process for a check, but they just said there is nothing they could do and they are waiting for the reviewer. I worked on the revisions promptly and returned them after a week. I was then told again that I would have to wait (this time about 2-3 weeks for a second revision). I got it back (2 months later) and it was conditionally accepted with more revisions requested. Again I worked on it promptly and re-submitted. Now it has been almost 3 months again. Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). Now I am not sure what to do, it feels like their deadlines keep getting pushed back, and they say there's nothing they can do and there has not been an update since the day after I submitted it. Should I request new reviewers or is that just the way it is? It has been over 16 months since I originally submitted the article.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dr. Justin C. Luong , thank you for this relevant discussion.
I agree with Dr. Daniel Adrian Doss .
In every profession there are people (say around 10 percent) with sadist tendency. Some reviewers think too much about themselves once they receive a manuscript from a journal. And, these kind of people like to project themselves as busiest persons in the world. Also, in the name of review, such reviewers suggest irrelevant opinions, suggestion or inputs.
It is unfortunate that we have few people among us. We can not identify from the name, religion, race or nationality of such people. They are everywhere. We have to omit, neglect, reject these reviewers/ journals.
I echo the words of Dr. Daniel Adrian Doss , you may consider withdrawing the paper, if possible.
I seek your kind attention to the fact that there are 90 percent of reviewers who are sincere, time bound, and offer genuine suggestions for the improvement of article quality. Reviewers are not paid. So, we should appreciate, promote, recommend, celebrate and respect these great people while boycotting & rejecting the remaining unworthy 10 percent of reviewers (related journals).
Best wishes and warm regards
Yoganandan
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
38 answers
I have heard as good as bad commentaries about this scientific publisher. In my case, I feel that the generalized perception is that this publisher is predatory. Can anyone tell me any experience (good or bad) with this publisher?. Your comments can help me to decide if I publish with this group.
Relevant answer
Personally, I consider that one must always distrust Magazines that request money from the author of the Article or Contribution to publish it.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
26 answers
I have just published a book with a big international science publisher (CRC Press, a branch of Taylor and Francis). The multi-author edited book is nice and hopefully useful for many (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321016401_Grasslands_of_the_world_diversity_management_and_conservation), but the experiences with the publisher were so disappointing that some co-authors and I decided to start a public discussion on writing scientific books in the age of greedy publishers.
Here are some key facts of our collaboration with CRC/Francis and Taylor:
· The communication with the publisher was very unreliable and inefficient: e.g. did we receive various requests multiple times and the publisher “forgot” about previous written agreements.
· The typesetting as the only service provided by the publisher was very poor: about 90% of the changes made by the publisher introduced errors into previously correct text or tables and it was very time-consuming for us to find all these errors and remove them again.
· Instead of paying the authors a honorarium for their work, the publisher forced us to pay for the colour figures in our articles.
· The publisher refused to give the authors a complimentary print copy of their book (only the editors got one).
· First the publisher wanted to provide an electronic version of the chapter/book only to each corresponding author, not to all authors, and only after serious negotiations they accepted to provide e-books to all authors. We assumed that these would be functional pdf’s, but instead they received the books in a very weird e-book format with a display in an ugly and hardly readable layout (e.g. all text in bold), not allowing proper printing nor sharing parts of the content (e.g. single pages or figures) with others. This means that the authors did not receive any printed or electronic copy of that exactly corresponds to the published version of their own work.
I am extremely frustrated about the behaviour of CRC/Francis and Taylor and consider the last point as being at the edge of unethical. My feeling is that CRC might only reflect the strategy of most international science publishers to maximise profit by pressing money out of both authors and readers/libraries, while at the same time minimising the service they provide. On the other hand my gut feeling tells me that nowadays with cheap print-on-demand technology and the possibility to distribute printed or open access e-books without the need to involve a big marketing/distribution machinery should allow for other solutions.
Therefore, I would like to ask you two questions:
· Did you make similar experiences with other science publishers, or are they better or even worse?
· Do you see ways how those among us who would like to continue to write nice and useful books can do this without sacrificing themselves to profit-maximisation strategy of the big international science publishers?
Looking forward to your responses and hoping for a lively debate,
Prof. Dr. Jürgen Dengler
(ZHAW, Wädenswil, Switzerland)
Relevant answer
Answer
I had a positive experience with Springer. I was involved in two book chapters; the publisher sent me a hard copy of the book.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
21 answers
Colleagues,
do you know some UAV-dedicated Special Issues that are open for submission now? Both Magazines and Journals SIs will be highly appreciated! No discrimination on the publishers (IEEE, Frontiers, MDPI, Elsevier, River....)!
Thank you :)
PS: I think following this discussion will be useful. both to find Special Issues and/or to advertise them
Relevant answer
Answer
Please see this one:
Special Issue "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Communication and Networking" A special issue of Electronics (ISSN 2079-9292) (IF: 2.397)
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
83 answers
Despite certain disadvantages, peer-review is generally accepted as a quality control of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals. The higher the rank of the journal, the more often manuscripts are rejected by the Editor for various reasons (lack of novelty, routine work, low technical quality etc.). Getting you manuscript back with staggering reviewer comments is a rather frustrating experience. What are your personal tips and tricks to avoid rejection?
Relevant answer
I fully agree and support the opinion of Prof. Filipe Wiltgen. Thanks.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
6 answers
Delhi, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala Ophthalmological societies have their own journals which are unfortunately not indexed in pubmed? What's your take on publishing works in these journals as first choice?
Relevant answer
Answer
Respected sir,
Indian journals like TNOA, KJO, JCOR,etc are indexed in directory of open access journals (DOAJ). According to recent NMC guidelines articles published in DOAJ indexed journals will be considered for academic promotions. Even case series published in these journals will be considered. So if somebody has academic promotion as the primary aim for publishing, then he/she can consider publishing in these journals.The quality of these journals are quite good.
But on the flip side, as has been previously answered, these articles will not get wide peer attention since they are non pub Med indexed.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
16 answers
Recently, one of my papers has been published after five year of its final acceptance by a SCI index journal, that to after lot of reminders. Can anybody suggest about fixing the upper time-limit for the publication of manuscripts at least in peer reviewed Journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have had the same experience. I received the acceptance letter in 2018. It will publish in the next issue of the journal (2021).
DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.2021025407
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
What is the future of scientific publishing in light of the trend of most journals to open access? And will this affect the quality of the scientific publication, as the view is still that the open-access is of lower quality and prestigious than the non-open one?
Relevant answer
Answer
Open access provides more chances for developing countries to access quality research. In addition, open access papers are more likely to be cited. Note that the quality of publications does not depend on being open access or not (but keep away from predatory journals). On the one side, many journals offer discounts and waive to developing countries and early-career scientists. On the other side, for senior scientists, by choosing open access you are showing that you can support your research with projects. So, if you can, yes, YOU SHOULD GO FOR OPEN ACCESS!
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
100 answers
I received an unsolicited email from Scientia Global and I can't tell if they are a predatory publisher of scientific journal articles or news articles or if they are legit.
"Dear Dr. April Robin Martinig, I hope you do not mind me emailing you directly, I thought it would be the easiest way to make first contact. If you have time for a short discussion I was hoping to speak with you about your research and our interest to feature your work in an upcoming issue of our science communication publication, Scientia. I will run you through this in more detail when we talk. But to give you a very quick insight into Scientia and the style in which we publish, I have attached a few example articles from research groups we have recently worked with. I have attached these as HTML files to reduce the size, but I can send PDF versions if you would prefer. You may also view one of our recent full publications here: https://www.scientia.global/scientia-issue-132/ Please let me know if you might have 10 minutes for a short phone call and advise when would be a good time and day for you to discuss further? I look forward to talking soon. Kind regards, Paris Allen"
Relevant answer
Answer
This ‘publisher’ (https://www.scientia.global/about/) is not a traditional publisher. It states and I quote: “We are not disclosing researchers’ scientific results for the first time, so peer review would not make sense. We are simply making (already peer-reviewed) research understandable and widely available to a broader audience, so that non-specialists can learn about the research and appreciate the significance of the results.”
It is (close to) vanity press and looks to me like companies like Research Outreach and ResearchPod see also:
It all looks nice but personally I see now added value to get involved with them (for costs you are redirect to https://www.scientia.global/publishing-cost/and would be at least 1000 GBP).
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
40 answers
Dear RG colleagues,
Let us discuss on what basis are the authors sequence in multi-authored publications is arranged? Does it depend only on the contribution’s weight of each author? How to estimate the contribution’s weight of each author? Are there other criteria to determine this arrangement? Thank you very much for sharing your opinions with us,
Kind regards
Relevant answer
Answer
In between some journals require the author's contribution irrespective of their order.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
13 answers
As all of us are familiar with the different journal ranking systems and requirement conditions, in many cases we meet different kind of fees, charges for publishing our researches. Usually only the submitting and the previewing cost US$ 50-250, which is non-refundable and the paper may be rejected by the editors without being sent for review. Others introduce fees for the publishing US$ 500 -1000 (extra fees for colour graphs, maps etc. or for appeals against a Chief Editor's decision). For good English, they offer some links for the grammar review: US$ 100-200. Besides all of this, they employ embargo for 12-36 months, and ask US$ 600-2500 for open access. I think these fees sometimes unreasonable, so it is hard not to find the business factor behind them.
Relevant answer
Answer
I do agree with the expert answers above
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
24 answers
What are some of the difficulties or disadvantages, if any, of publishing in high impact journals?
Thanks in advance for your participation!
Relevant answer
The only drawback is the time. These journals take a long time for research to be accepted for publication and some of them are very expensive for my person.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
36 answers
How to distinguish between a predatory journal and genuine journal in publish our research work??? Every now and then we get emails for the publisher to submit our work to their journals......
Relevant answer
Answer
please search on https://doaj.org/ here for checking your journal
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
13 answers
Dear Colleagues, I hope someone can provide some answer :
I recently had notified by Research Gate that ELSEVIER editorial did notified them that they needed to take one Scientific Article I had on my Research Items down, due to violation of ELSEVIER's Copyright.
This article was published on the Journal "Nano Energy", of ELSEVIER's, and I appear as the first autor.
Is there a way to keep one of this articles on your RG Items without infringing the Copyrights of ELSEVIER ?
Can I try to upload it again? This time under the "Private" mode (not open sharing, but via request)
Or it's better to leave the matter alone? Meaning that all ELSEVIER's editorial articles cannot be shared freely on Research Gate ?
Thank You! Best Regards !
Relevant answer
Answer
inerestibg situation, very actually in modern time. answers will be useful to many researchers
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
30 answers
There are several journals with varying impact factors. Still we find journals having no impact factor. I want to know whether the impact or importance of a researcher becomes less to a scientific community when he/she publishes a paper in a journal with low impact factor or no impact factor?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear All, I may be old-fashioned, but in my personal opinion publishing in high-ranked and high-IF journal is the best way to make your valuable research visible to exopert colleagues in your field of research. Please see in this context this closely related RG thread entitled "How do you increase the visibility of published article?"
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
9 answers
I need a co-author for a scopus article to participate in ІСSF 2021, Innovative Approaches for Solving Environmental Issues Workshop (IASEI-WS'2021), Kyiv. The article has already been written and is ready for publication. I am the main athor of this article. It is is an overview article about means of remote monitoring of air quality, and the possibility of their use for operational monitoring in Ukraine. I place a discreet emphasis on using the UAV.
link to the conference website: https://icsf.ccjournals.eu/2021/index2.html
Requirements for a co-author: student, PhD student, or any other researcher who works in a scientific institution at a given time. The institution should not be located in Ukraine or in the Russian Federation (such co-authors already exist).
If you are interested, please contact me as soon as possible.
Deadline of this offer - 28.12.2020
Anastasiia Turevych,
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
I am interested and from Kenya. I have PhD in environmental studies. Please count me in.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
11 answers
We in the scientific community often hear about and are aware of some unworthy individuals copying and reproducing results (without due recognition of authors right). How shall we create responsibility and make aware of those who may do such unlawful acts presumably without knowing?
Relevant answer
We should build honesty with the people at the early stage when they are kids.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
162 answers
The peer review system has been the cornerstone of scientific publishing for centuries.
Relevant answer
Let me point to another case. Another journal gave me a chance to publish one free-of-charge paper at the expense of I was one of their reviewers.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
33 answers
I am looking for research papers copied (in full or in part) by other papers to identify a "percentage of plagiarism". Authors can be different. Can you help me find any papers?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
13 answers
plagiarism free check
Relevant answer
Kindly, could you please see the following warning that is related to this valuable question of Dr. Muhammad S. Mansy?
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
17 answers
I just found Viper but I'm having some problems with it. Is there any other plagiarism software online?
Relevant answer
Let me point to another perspective that Katalin Bikadi said.
I don't recommend using such free software checkers for plagiarism. This is because the original content of your manuscript might be copied and sold to others before it is published. Use your own words instead.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
11 answers
Hi,
I'm working with a set of soil analyses obtained from an external laboratory.
Studying the results, I am highly confident that one of the analyses gave incorrect results because the values are extremely unlikely (in total disagreement with what is normally naturally occurring).
Besides, I have conducted additional analyses to triple-check this analysis.
The results I have obtained contradict, as I expected, the anomalous data.
The problem is, that the method I used is not the same as the initial method (unavailable at my lab), but is supposed to measure the same variable.
Now that it is time to write a research article, what would you do to overcome this problem?
Should I explain that for this particular analysis, results were abnormal and were not considered further?
Should it be done early in the results section, or later in the discussion section?
How have you dealt with unexpected/erroneous data with your research, when you cannot repeat the same analysis?
Will a journal accept to publish results which include one bad apple, while the rest of the basket is fine?
Relevant answer
Answer
First thing, I would present this to the external lab. Perhaps they can look back at notes, strip charts or other outputs to check for mistake. Then if that fails, present the truth with the possible erroneous value and cross checked with other methods, and discuss briefly in findings. Like suggested, if the whole journal paper has no value with this issue included, then you will probably get some bad marks from editor or reviewers, possible suggestions to recover. When you say the value from lab is extremely unlikely or unnatural, it is likely the lab just made a mistake, it happens. It would be better for them to review the circumstance and your cross checking, and agree there was a mistake and then use your value based on their agreement, with a footnote perhaps briefly mentioning this attached to the value. Other issues can develop such as if your cross checking followed much later in time and samples were not preserved and/or stored properly. You may have to justify your work too.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
106 answers
I know it gives another chance to resubmit after major revision. But could corresponding author consider "Reject & Resubmit" as a simple reject, and submit the article to another journal? Should corresponding author ask for permission of previous journal?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks T. Edelmann-very informative! I do a reasonable amount of peer-review and have never been offered "Reject & Resubmit" as an option for my use. It's always, accept, accept with minor revisions, accept with major revisions, reject.
Perhaps it's something the Editor can use after reviews are in?
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
14 answers
In some journal papers, I am included in the acknowledgement section. Reason for this is, I have helped them in taking some measurements. How should we mention such contributions in the CV?
Relevant answer
Answer
This is such an interesting discussion thread question because I think that it depends on where the researcher may be in their development. For instance, I just placed my answer to a similar Research Gate discussion thread question, as follows:
" Rokia Sakr ,
In my opinion, there are a number of benefits to gain if your name is acknowledged in a scientific paper: (1) When you list your References on your Curriculum Vitae, it will be very helpful to the readers of your CV to know that you contributed to the research and writing of a scientific paper, and, yes, you should, absolutely, acknowledge your work relationship with your Reference; (2) Acknowledgments are somewhat similar to Research Gate, which has both scientific and social factorials; (3) Acknowledgements notes or sections in a published work are informative, so that readers of the article, review, or monograph may increase their knowledge of researchers in the field; in this regard, acknowledging persons or groups or organizations actually might be viewed as a foundational part of the research because often entities mentioned in the Acknowledgments really have been instrumental in making the research and writing and publication possible! " [end of my quoted answer]
In addition, in my view, it is both an honor for the recipient of a formalized acknowledgement and it is also, it seems to me, an obligation for a researcher to acknowledge the contribution and/or participation of other people, whether colleagues, administrators, research assistants, students, staff members, and any persons who helped in the creation of the work activities and material results.
Of course, the issue has some intricate and delicate aspects. For example, should any individuals be acknowledged if they are simply doing their jobs? In other words, should acknowledgements be reserved for persons whose efforts on behalf of the research project go above and beyond the call of duty? And what about mentioning the names of nuclear family members, such as the researcher's parents, siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren? On a somewhat humorous note, I have even observed book authors who acknowledge the immeasureable or unfathomable help provided by the family pet(s)!
With regard to the "negotiable exchange value" of being named in the acknowledgements in an article, review, or book-length monograph, I think that it would depend on the individual circumstances. When my name appeared in the Acknowledgements section in The Collected Works of W.B. Yeats, Volume 2, The Plays, by the volume editor, Professor Dr. David R. Clark, and his daughter, Rosalind E. Clark, I considered it to be a great honor to be listed with leading research scholars in the field, particularly so because Yeats won the 1923 Nobel Prize for Literature, two years following Albert Einstein's 1921 Nobel Prize for Physics (discovery of the photoelectric effect).
This is an excellent topic for this Research Gate discussion thread because I think that there is a great deal of latitude, especially because the Acknowledgements are at the heart, and maybe even the soul, of a research project, hence it is a personal decision on the part of the author(s), who may even decide to mention the names of the book publisher's in-house editorial staff, paid or unpaid word processing helpers (who are sometimes family members), and I have often observed scholars of articles and books acknowledge their anonymous referees or reviewers for making helpful and valuable suggestions.
Very best regards and best wishes to all.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Or, put another way, all the new journals that are created are really necessary?
Here you are our contribution to the debate:
Urbano, C.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Somoza-Fernández, M.; Rodríguez-Gairín, JM. (2020). “Why are new journals created?". Profesional de la Informacion (2020) 29(4) 1-19.
Are you a publisher or an editor who has recently participated in the launch of a new journal ... What is your opinion?
Relevant answer
Answer
To increase the chances of publications. For me, I am not capable of publishing in top tier journals like nature, nevertheless, can still publish in small journals that are not as prestigious (low impact factor 2 -3) but undergo a strict peer review process and are pubmed registered too.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
Frontiers in Psychology has a decent Impact Factor and is one of the highly cited journals in the field, but the journal is not listed in the ABS journal quality guidelines. I was wondering if it's a good idea for someone working in a business school to consider the journal as a potential outlet for organizational psychology related topics.
Relevant answer
Answer
This journal is, as you said, indexed in:
-Scopus (CiteScore 3.2)
-SSCI by Clarivate (Impact factor 2.067)
And is also in:
-PubMed Central (PMC)
-DOAJ (member)
-COPE (member)
There is hardly any better guarantee imaginable that you are dealing with a genuine and legit journal.
Indeed, the publisher behind this journal “Frontiers Media SA” is (still) mentioned in Beall’s net:
They have been added in 2015. It is generally accepted that the Beall’s list is not flawless and to me the (continuous) inclusion of this publisher is the best prove of this. Jeffrey Beall overplayed his hand by this inclusion. In his ultimate goal to expand his list he wanted to proof that he can tackle a pretty big player like Frontiers, but I think he is/was wrong.
Frontiers is one of the fastest growing publishers dedicated to open access. Facts are:
-Over 40 of their journals have an official impact factor (from Clarivate)
-Round 50 of their journal are indexed in Scopus (with CiteScore)
In my field (Life Sciences) I have seen numerous big names with one or more publications in one of their journals. So, I think you can be sure that publishing in this journal is a safe choice and beneficial for your career.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
12 answers
I am curious to know why a methodology will get acceptance in one journal for a given topic and get rejected in another journal for another topic. Take Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) application in Civil Engineering problems for an example. You find Civil Engineering journals accepting or rejecting papers with ANN methodology. How can one overcome these barriers?
As a reviewer, in your view what are the criteria you use to accept or reject a paper with machine learning applications?
If a machine learning method that has not been previously used is applied to a model (a common topic ), how do you as a reviewer respond?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr,
Isaac Dinaharan
, Jumoke Soyemi Muhammad Ali Andrew Paul McKenzie Pegman Dr Radha Mohan Pattanayak and Mauro Luisetto thank you for your contribution.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
10 answers
I am graduating from business school as part of my med school program in two weeks. I'm working on a paper with a team that will be ready to submit for publication this week. Most likely, I will actually have my degree by the time the manuscript is in front of a reviewer, and definitely by the time it's published. Is it permissible for me to include my MBA in the author's section since I will have it before publication, or am I required to leave it off because I do not officially have the degree at the time of submission?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mr. Daniel Hayward ,
I agree with Dr. Madhukar Baburao Deshmukh and Mr. Akash Gupta . Actually you can't add it because you do not officially have the MBA degree at the time of submission. But you may write to publisher when you will get the degree.
Best,
Dr. Vardan Atoyan
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
18 answers
The highest impact factor journals are often criticized for rejecting too many too fast, and often too unfairly, a high proportion of the manuscripts they receive. Since they receive a larger amount of manuscripts relative to lower IF Journals, they are considered (assumed?) able to select the best quality research in their field. But, are they really publishing better science than lower impact journals? Many excellent scientists across the globe are unable to publish in High IF journals because they are unable to afford the publication fees. One may think that in many (most?) cases the quality of science high IF journals publish is not necessarily better than lower IF journals (note that High vs Low IF is a relative comparison, there is not a line/value separating both). What do you think? For instance, are the papers you have published in the highest IF Journal, your best quality papers? Do you see a positive relationship between IF and the quality of the science being published?
Relevant answer
Answer
High impact factor journals are, most of the times, more interested in articles from established and well known scholars who have made names in their chosen careers. It is always very difficult for young and upcoming scholars to break into highly rated journals. Whether articles have high quality or not is not always the priority of the first-class journals. Hardly can you see a novice (unknown scholar) publishing in "A*" journals. It is always a hard nut to crack for unknown scholars. Researchers generally pay more attention to articles from high impact factor journals irregardless of the quality. Thus, articles from high impact factor journals tend to attract more citations. This could be reasons many quality articles are eventually published in low impact factor journals.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
209 answers
I just received a request for a review from "Internal Medicine Journal". I had a surprise recently with Journal of rare disease research and treatment for whom I wrote an "invited commentary" that appeared to be not so free (over 1000$), and I wonder if this one could also be a "predatory publisher". Has anyone information about this journal? Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
In my case a very persistent A. Lesnevskyi, M.D. is inviting me already over 4 times, quite annoyingly, to contribute also something completely off topic to the same journal.
There are so many 'fake' journal contribution invitations spamming my inbox, that I almost always automatically delete them. When it is a serious non-predatory invitation, the author will probably introduce him/herself more properly, have a serious subject in the email, they will know more about your work, and will rather invite you more specifically to write something in the field you are actually working in, instead of some interstellar galactic generalistic non-defined topic that has hardly any direct links with your work.
For me it also works to only publish in journals that I have been reading myself.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
I was and am interested in this topic because I was wondering how much it would actually cost (annually) to run a technical journal for environment, including all costs starting with office space (if one sticks to that tradition) paying staff and expenses (servers etc.). I was wondering if it would be possible to run a small technical journal for environment without publication costs on alterative funding (without excessive need of volunteers). I thank you for your helps and cooperation that will be given to us!
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
63 answers
Lets say you know very well the basics about writing, contents, formatting and style. Right before submission (your research is complete), do you focus only on the instructions for authors of the selected journal? Do you try to make the best/catchy title ever? Select a specific editor? do you contact the editor/journal before you submit? In short, Do you have a formula/method you apply? would you share it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Note sure why RG thinks I should answer this… but here are my 2 cents… recognizing I deal mostly with clinical and pre-clinical biomedical topics and not sure how relevant it applies elsewhere
1. Pick a journal that best aligns your paper in terms of topic and interest. Has the journal publish related topics before? Is the impact of the journal at the same level as your paper? Is the audience correct? We are often asked to rate how relevant the topic is. Looking at recent issues can help to see if your paper fits.
2. Pick a journal that covers your study type. Instruction for authors usually has this info. This seems particularly true for reviews, case studies, observational studies, and meta-analyses.
3. Cover letters put your work in context… why is it important? Does your work continues the story told by a recent paper in the same journal? Does this work answer big questions raised during the last national conference/meeting? Does the paper further the aim of the journal in some unexpected way? If you don’t know why your paper is important, why should anyone else?
4. Recommending reviewers and handling editor is a hit or miss. Recommending a handling editor seems to only help if your topic is not clearly in the realm of one of the editors… which is already problematic. Some journals appreciate reviewer recommendations, others will ask for them then ignore them. Recommending reviewers seems to do better for smaller journals that may accept them and help streamline the process. Won’t hurt either way.
5. Contacting the editor. Not the norm for my field and rarely done. Exceptions are when you are writing an unsolicited review or interesting case study kind of thing. What would you say? Difficult for editor to judge the merit of your study without data/manuscript. I would put whatever is important in the cover letter instead.
6. Title should be clear and helpful. Avoid turning your title into a click-bait. Trying to make the title catchy and cute often only makes the content very unclear. Worse, if your title does not match your findings, we will write “conclusion not supported by actual results/findings.”
7. Authorship should be reasonable. A paper with 20+ authors that can be done with 3-5 makes the authors and paper look bad. Subconsciously, a paper with more authors is often judged more harshly due to higher expectations.
8. Language editing- have someone who speaks the language check your manuscript. If we can’t understand your work, we can’t review it fairly and have no choice but to click “requires major language editing.” Sometimes the writing is so bad that you can’t tell what it says. Do you have international collaborators who can review your paper for both content and language?
9. Be concise- avoid mentioning things you do not know anything about. We see this in biomedical papers quite a bit, where authors try to make their papers more “clinically relevant” by randomly mentioning specific diseases without backing their claims. Usually this is done badly that it distracts from the study.
10. Avoid citing papers unnecessarily and incorrectly and don’t plagiarize… including yourself. Sometimes the reviewers are identified from your references. We do not take it kindly when you cite us for things we did not say. We like it even less when you plagiarize us. Key and review papers are often very well known, and obvious when you copy them.
11. Consider reviewer comments even if your paper is rejected. Human beings spent their time reading and reviewing your work for free (usually)... use it. The academic world is a very small place… sometimes we get the exact same manuscript to review that we have previously read for a different journal.
12. Publish for quality not quantity... sadly a sentiment not endorsed by some academic environments in terms of promotion opportunities.
-Angry reviewer #2
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
47 answers
We know that rejection of research papers is very common in academic publishing, but what really bothers the authors is rejecting their papers without stating the reasons for rejection by editors, particularly when the paper matches the scope of the journal and the writing of the paper is academically acceptable, but it still somehow not enough to get accepted. The decision letter only informs the authors about the decision without any further explanations as to why such a decision was taken, many editors do this, it happened to me a couple of times. Why do editors do this? Why don't they care to explain the reasons for rejection? This is completely unfair to authors, especially if the submitted paper complies with the journal requirements. It's very frustrating. What should the authors do in this case?
Relevant answer
Answer
The phrase "academically acceptable" is a phrase that publishers use, and I think it means, literally, that your writing is not academically stringent enough. That night mean, for example, that you write like you talk - which you shouldn't, and It might also indicate that the paper has the wrong structure. I suggest that you talk with a senior scientist near you about this.
I can also give you a hint from me - based on a paper of mine and a colleague about academic writing:
“Subben׳s checklist” and the assessment of articles in mathematical optimization/operations research: In memoriam of Subhash C. Narula
It is - literally - a guide to both the writing of a paper, and how to assess the quality of a paper.
I really do think you will have much use for it, and I suggest you talk with your closest senior scientist so that your use of it becomes optimal. She/he will know. :-)
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
Suppose a paper have been reviewed by three different reviewer's.
Two reviewer's suggested acceptance of the article, and one suggests not to accept the article.
In such situations, what the editor does?
Relevant answer
Normally, two referees review a paper. If the answers are conflicting a third referee or the editor decides in which way to go.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
24 answers
In the medical discipline, the first and the last authors are the most contributed authors and the middle author is the least (in a curve). In contrast, in the Engineering discipline, contribution level goes from the who contributed the most to the least: first (most contribution), second, third, fourth..... last author (least contribution).
If an author is working in both medical and Engineering disciplines, how should he/she fix the author order in publications?
As the scientific community does not follow a uniform standard to express authorship, the readers have no clue about the contributions made by each co-author. Any thoughts?
Relevant answer
Answer
I prefer a procedure explained by Roger B. Winston in a 1985 article ("A Suggested Procedure for Determining Order of Authorship in Research Publications"). He suggested a scoring system to order authors. Ten tasks were considered (e.g. research design, drafting, literature search, and interpreting) each of them has a point. One task could be done by more than one person. In this case, point will be divided based on quantitative or qulititave criteria.
I has attached the table. Based on this system, almost a student always will be the first one.
Of course you should connect between your research type and the terms were used in this paper. For example, "instrument construction" when you are doing a CFD based research could be drawing the model, meshing, and setting the solution parameters.
This scoring method could be used in any discipline, I think.
Special thanks to Roger B. Winston, JR
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
102 answers
Does that imply different levels in the process of admission to JCR?
Emerging Sources Citation Index (Is the waiting list to be evaluated for JCR?): http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/S024651_Flyer.pdf
Relevant answer
Answer
I think the journal master list contains journals classified under SCI, A & HCI and SSCI. They already have impact factor.
But those journals under ESCI have no impact factor as far as clarivate analytics is concerned. They may have impact factor in Scopus, scimago or snips.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
44 answers
Does it mean they found it interesting at first?
I'm a new researcher. All inputs would be appreciated. Thank you very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Is it normal to wait for a year after submitting to a journal only to have your article rejected? I I didn't experience anything as such. To me, this is a too long while.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
There are times when I think that articles are rejected or comments are too mean based on ethnicity and just being female.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is very common. Some journals only consider papers from the authors of high income countries such as US, UK, China, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe. I have had papers rejected merely based on the argument that the data is from a developing country and may not be applicable to global community. Arguably, the same can be held true for data from the high income countries. Some editors are biased against authors from low and middle income countries and some even have their pet authors and reviewers who only publish in these journals. Sometimes, reviewers and authors reject papers to increase the impact of their journals. However, there are good editors and reviewers who review for highest quality journals and evaluate papers based on quality of science and writing.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
11 answers
Depending on your experience in scientific publishing in the field of marketing, there are scientific areas that you recommend taking into consideration the conditions of copyright, cost and time and ranking.
Relevant answer
Answer
For the field of marketing, as it is the case with other areas, you need to select a journal that is interested in the topic of your research, of good impact factor and can reach researchers that share your interest. Now whether you chose an open access journal or not, I think this will depend on your budget and your research purpose. You need to discuss the selection of the journal among your co-authors unless they have authorised you for this step.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
16 answers
Dear one & all Kindly give the details for the similarities and difference between Article, Communication, Notes, Reports, Full paper, Featured Article, Perspectives, Review, & Tutorial ... How to select the suit one? What are the criteria for this? Most us select on the basis of length our findings; and present and previous work summery. This discussion is seems to be very simple.... but it is always better if we get an better idea of each one... May be it will help for research beginners..
Relevant answer
Answer
Types of Articles
Original articles.  These are complete papers of experimental research in any branch of physiological sciences. The articles accepted for publication will be made upon the consideration that they describe significant and new findings and that adequate experimental details are given.
Reviews. These are articles that review current research work in the area that has major advancement or of interests by the readers. The papers may be invited and/or reviewed by referees and the authors are fully responsible of their articles. Contributors must follow the general instructions where applicable.
Short research communications. These are short reports of experimental research, which have considered that the results should be distributed quickly. The experimental data have currently displayed in any scientific meeting are also encouraged for publication. The maximum length allowance will be 1500 words.
Editorial comments. These can be invited articles commenting the research article published in the same issue of the journal or unsolicited commentaries on current topics of interest. The maximum length allowance will be 1500 words.
Case report. A maximum of 2 figures and 1 table are allowed with up to 10 references.
Letter to the editor. A letter should be no longer than 1000 words without figure or table and should discuss or comment on an article previously published in the JPBS. Up to 10 references are allowed.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
8 answers
I have a short article, which I would like to submit to a broad ecological journal and I'd value a few suggestions.
Relevant answer
Answer
Marine biodiversity accept short notes in the section Oceanarium. Coral Reefs aslo accept short note in the section Reef Site. More than notes, those are short comment to a picture showing something interesting.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
44 answers
Dear fellows,
I would like to know your opinion, as authors of academic papers, on your preferred peer-review type(s). Different journals implement different policies, from completely open to double-blind in various shades.
Please feel free to discuss your preferences in the comments!
Here is a starting list of existing and more creative options:
- Single-blind review. A classic. The name of the reviewers is not known to the authors, but the reviewers know the names of the authors. The reviewers may choose to disclose their identity during the peer review process or upon publication.
- Double-blind review. Increasingly popular. The name of the reviewers is not known to the authors, and the reviewers do not know the names of the authors. The identity of the reviewers might be disclosed upon publication.
- Open review. The name of the reviewers is known to the authors at any stage of the peer review, and it's published with the paper afterwards.
- Fully open (all-in). The name of the reviewers is known at any stage of the peer review and afterwards. In addition, the reviews are published online with the accepted paper.
- Open discussion. The manuscript is immediately published as a preprint. Reviewers (which may choose to remain anonymous or not) are appointed by an editor. Their reviews appear online as soon as they are submitted. The authors post their response online together with the revised manuscript, and so on until the editor makes a final decision.
- Very open discussion. Like the open discussion, but also members of the community can post (signed) online comments to the manuscript, and the authors may reply and account for them in the revised manuscript.
- Triple-blind. The review process is not public. The authors don't know the reviewers, the reviewers don't know the authors, and even the handling editor doesn't know the authors.
- Quadruple-blind (poker). The authors don't know the reviewers, the reviewers don't know the authors, the editor doesn't know the authors, the editor doesn't know the reviewers (which are chosen from a pool of eligible reviewers through keywords).
- Quintuple-blind. Like the quadruple blind, but the authors don't know the name of the handling editor.
- Sestuple-blind. Like the quadruple blind, but even the reviewers don't know the name of the handlind editor.
- Hardcore-blind. The authors submit their manuscript to the publisher, without the possibility of indicating the target journal. After anonymous peer review, the publisher suggests the suitable journal based on the reviewers scores. The authors may agree or appeal.
Other variants/suggestions are welcome!
Relevant answer
Answer
Double blind review is an illusion as the authors' identity is easy to unveil. Douple-open review is the only ethical, democratic and responsible system. Those who choose to be anonymous reviewers because of fear to say their opinion eponymously are not capable of being reviewers.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
2 answers
I am going to have printed a scientific book with illustrations. They are small screenshots grabbed from historical books (e.g. 18th-century). The books are available freely online in digital libraries across the world. Can I use such illustrations (they are small-area images cropped from single pages) in my book? The book will be sold by a scientific publishing house. Any experience regarding legal aspects of this will be welcome. Shall I obtain any license or permission? This is neither using the entire source scanned by someone, nor a re-edition of such.
Relevant answer
Answer
HOWEVER, while the original work may be out of copyright, the reproduction can have a current copyright. Be sure to read the terms of service of the site where you find the online versions very carefully to determine whether their reproduction is free to use or has a current copyright.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
122 answers
Some researchers acknowledge anonymous reviewers for reviewing their manuscripts. Do you think that reviewers know that they have been acknowledged? Do you think that reviewers care to read these acknowledgements? Any benefits to reviewers if they are acknowledged when their identities are not known/revealed?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is important to be grateful for anything someone has done for you. It is a show of maturity and you do not lose anything
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
20 answers
Studies have shown that as many as 50% of submissions are declined directly by editors after being submitted. If the paper receives a “yay” instead of a “nay,” the journal sends it to reviewers. How do journals select competent reviewers?
Common sense says that more experience and a higher rank translate to better reviewing skills. However, a PLOS Medicine study in 2007 showed no such relationship. The authors examined 2,856 reviews by 308 reviewers for Annals of Emergency Medicine, a revered journal that for over 15 years has rated the quality of each review using a numerical scoring system. The results showed that experience, academic rank, and formal training in epidemiology or statistics did not significantly predict subsequent performance of higher-quality reviews. It also suggested that, in general, younger reviewers submitted stronger reviews.
So what? When presented the opportunity, any physician can and would produce a scrupulous review of a manuscript — right? Wrong.
Flashback to 1998, when Annals of Emergency Medicine cleverly put together a fictitious manuscript riddled with errors and distributed it to 203 reviewers for evaluation. The errors were divided into major and minor categories. The major errors included such blunders as faulty or plainly unscientific methods, as well as blatantly erroneous data analyses. Minor errors consisted of failure to observe or report negative effects on study participants, incorrect statistical analysis, and fabricated references — just to mention a few. According to the authors, the majority of peer reviewers failed to identify two-thirds of the major errors in the manuscript. Forty-one percent of reviewers indicated that the manuscript should be accepted for publication.
What about consistency? In 1982, two authors took twelve papers that had been published by prestigious psychology journals within the previous three years and resubmitted them to the respective journals. The names of the authors for the resubmitted papers, and the names of their affiliations, were all changed to fictitious ones. Three manuscripts were recognized as being duplicates. Of the nine remaining papers, eight were rejected for “methodological inconsistencies,” not for lack of originality. One paper was accepted again.
Last week, I received an email from a well-respected medical journal. The editor wanted my help reviewing a manuscript that was being considered for publication. Noticing the request was addressed to “Dr. Spencer,” I shot back a quick reply saying there’d been a mistake. I’m not a doctor; I’m a medical student.
Hours later, I got this response:
Thank you for your email. We would very much appreciate your review of this manuscript. Your degree information has been corrected.
The peer review process clearly has flaws. It’s no wonder so many publications are retracted every year, or that each issue of a journal includes several corrections of previously published articles. Without universal standards, manuscript reviews remain subjective, imperfect, and inconsistent at best. The time has come to re-examine the quality of this system.
Meanwhile, those who rely on medical journals for practice guidelines should be educated on the flawed nature of this system and should be encouraged to judge publications on their merit rather than the apparent prestige of a journal.
Now, if you’ll please excuse me, I have a manuscript to review.
Robert Spencer is a medical student.
Relevant answer
Answer
More worrisome is when reviewers delay and reject research they intend to plagiarize, or steal and publish under their name:
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
60 answers
I am interested in exploring whether criteria for academic success for professors are culture-sensitive. Is it the academic rank, publications, or teaching excellence?
Relevant answer
Answer
Criterias of success depend on government criterias and from type of scientists! In my country scientists are two type - researcher and teachers at the university. The latters have not enough time for write.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
18 answers
Hi all,
I have found my experience with Elsevier to be increasingly frustrating over the years, especially with the copy-editing. Once a paper gets accepted (assuming it is in TeX format with perfect formatting), a month can easily pass by until the corrected proofs are actually available. The publisher seems to be careless and irresponsible about the typesetting and copy-editing (which is the only job they actually do in addition to selling our work!), e.g. in my recent Corrosion Science paper I had to submit a long list of comments when they simply messed up the paper layout completely and inserted incomprehensible symbols ("-->") everywhere in the text.
I am wondering what is your experience with other publishers, e.g. AIP, IOP, or Springer? Now I am deliberately trying to choose suitable journals that are not published by Elsevier for my next publication, and so far I've found one belonging to AIP and another to IOP.
Thanks
N.B.: There's almost a monopoly of the above-mentioned publisher in certain scientific fields, which is alarming to me!
Relevant answer
Answer
MDPI has fast process.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
4 answers
Hey,
please, can anyone provide an explanation to me what is the scientific publisher in the worldwide and tell me how many they are and named them?
Based on what they are rated?
Also, what is the relation between the scientific publisher and the database (Scopus and ISI)?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
129 answers
Before, in my country and several countries was considered the first author more important than the corresponding author. Recently the situation has changed.
I believe that first author is usually carried out most of the practical part of the research and must be the correspondence author too. Co-authors do part of the work.
What is the difference between first and corresponding author? Can PhD students be a corresponding author?
Dear all respected researchers; kindly let me know your opinion.
Relevant answer
Answer
Amir - the first author is usually the corresponding author. If a PhD student is submitting their own work then, as with all my PhD students, they are the 'lead' and first author in the article - and that should make them the corresponding author by default. I'm aware that it might be a different arrangement in different parts of the world but, at the end of the day, that is (to me) the fairest and most ethical arrangement. No matter how much support a PhD student receives from the supervision team - it is still their project and their data.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
5 answers
What do you think the future of scientific publishing? Do you think that all journals will move to open access journals? or do you think open access journals will gradually disappear? What is the future of this area?
Relevant answer
Answer
A string of a dozen responses that bear on the future of scientific publishing, especially open access, is at https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_you_think_all_journals_should_be_open_access_for_knowledge_sharing. My take was that:
"Open access has pros and cons. For sure, making articles (and other knowledge products) free for all does increase readership, which may be particularly important in low-income countries where researchers recurrently explain that lack of access to subscription-based journals is a problem. That said, someone must still cover the cost of publication: where funds are scarce, this may discourage authors from going open access. Other disadvantages may include lack of quality control and sustainability: on the one hand, open access models may incentivize journals to publish more articles; on the other, they may not adequately support the research publication infrastructure in the long term."
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
7 answers
In the era of open access publication and the emergence of a huge number of journals that barely follow publishing ethics (no peer review/pay and publish). It becomes necessary that all journals must be screened by an authority based on editorial/reviewer board/scientific content and other criteria.
I have noted some online journals publishing >150 papers quarterly.
Relevant answer
Answer
If grading of scientific journals is a issue then who will grade/what will be the criteria of good journals/ which journals are of high scientific value -many issues like these will come forward. So it is better to leave the issue and to allow it to go as usual.
  • asked a question related to Scientific Publishing
Question
14 answers
I understand today that scientific publishing, to contribute effectively to science, must follow specific strategies. What are the main tactics that should be followed?
(If you liked this question, please recommend it to extend the scope of this discussion.)
Relevant answer
Answer
All from here doing great job. Still other have a problem to read the texts in Russia, Chinese or Spanish and many more. Internet can not translate all.