Scientific Publication - Science topic

Now that I am studying for a PhD, I find that the philosophy of science plays a fundamental role in the research process. However, this is not sufficiently well disseminated neither in training processes nor in high-level scientific publications. Why does this happen?

Hello All.

Many thanks in advance for the upcoming answers to my query. So I just wanted to know if anyone has knowledge about if there is any publication fees/charges for sending and publishing (if accepted) article in The Journal of Rorschachiiana- the Scientific Publication of The International Society of the Rorchach?

any information will be of great help.

Thanks and regards,

Sreetama Chatterjee

What is the best software to draw the optical graphics abstracts in scientific publications?

Thanks in advance.

Dear colleagues, I challenge you for comments and references to scientific publications through the following topic: 'Problems in speech and communication disorders'. I wish you nice days! Thank you in advance! Julia Doncheva

I prepared an article that resulted a baseline aspect. But I do not understand, in what types fields, in where I submit the article in marine pollution bulletin (Baseline and normal). Moreover i have two article in review in baseline study. Can i submit again a paper in baseline? Has any quality deviation regarding two kind of publishing (Baseline and normal) in marine pollution bulletin. Actually i want to submit the article as a corresponding author. want a good suggestion.thank you for advance.

After 1 January 2020 scientific publications on the results from research funded by public grants provided by national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms. https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plan_S.pdf

What is your opinion?

Dear fellow scientists, here's sth that puzzles me at present: In virtually all research repositories that I know, PDF documents dominate, even though they are a 1990s format targeted at bringing classical paper documents to screen, without being resonsive not linked. Back in the 90ies, though, Tim Berners-Lee proposed another format with hypertext capabilities for scientific exchange. Why do paper-page-style PDF still dominate so much? Do you have ideas? Or do you know about other formats that may exist out there in communities beyond mine (chemistry/physics/materials science)?

I have been asked to submit a paper on a special issue of Genes- MDPI. The impact factor of the journal is showing to be 3.4 but I saw conflicting articles about the MDPI journals being a predatory one. Though the editor of the issue is a reputed person in the field, I am bit confused about the journal in general. What are your thoughts?

Having received an invitation to publish an ultra-short research papers (800-1600 words), such as brief reports, case studies, or “orphaned” findings and ideas dropped from previously-published work in this journal, I would like to ask for your opinion on the quality of scientific publication in such a journal, especially on the quality of peer review and the editorial process.

Hey everyone, I am looking for a comprehensive overview of all variables that the big five personality traits (OCEAN) have been correlated with. I know some isolated reviews for the big five and depression or academic success but I was wondering if there is one overview of all correlations reported in scientific publications?

Differentiating Science from Pseudoscience is becoming a challenge at so many levels these days. How can we separate the two and acknowledge a grey area in between?

Impacts of individual publications are often measured via citation rates. Average citation per publication rates differ across research domains (e.g. Mathematics versus Ecology). Is there a minimum number of citations required to call a paper important or influential, and if so, how many?

Theoretically, there should be as few restrictions as possible in such matters in the world of science. Science should develop in an unhampered way. Whether less restrictions and regulations can be developed to a greater extent by innovative solutions.

On the other hand, the more authors who have written a specific publication together, the more difficult it is to objectively evaluate the contribution of individual co-authors to the creation of a specific publication. There are several pages of scientific articles that have been written by over 100 authors. Usually, these are also members of research teams for large-scale research projects.

In addition, in the last dozen or so years, research has shown that the quantitative proportion of single-author scientific texts is falling relative to the total of scientific publications being produced. Therefore, more scientific multi-authorial publications have been created in recent years in comparison to single-author ones. What are the reasons?

In the light of the above, the following questions arise:

In addition, new questions arise in connection with the development of new information technologies:

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

How to obtain currently necessary information from Big Data database systems for the needs of specific scientific research and necessary to carry out economic, business and other analyzes?

Of course, the right data is important for scientific research. However, in the present era of digitalization of various categories of information and creating various libraries, databases, constantly expanding large data sets stored in database systems, data warehouses and Big Data database systems, it is important to develop techniques and tools for filtering large data sets in those databases data to filter out of terabytes of data only information that is currently needed for the purpose of conducted scientific research in a given field of knowledge, for the purposes of obtaining answers to a given research question and for business needs, eg after connecting these databases to Business Intelligence analytical platforms. I described these issues in my scientific publications presented below.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Dear Colleagues and Friends from RG

I invite you to discussion and cooperation.

Best wishes

The scientist tries to publish in high-ranked places but he is not always able to publish in other journals, which are low-scoring or without points. It depends on the field in which it operates scientifically, how many scientific journals are scored in a given field and what are the requirements and limitations.

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Hello.

Is it possible to utilize the first derivative of the PL spectra to reveal the overlapping or hidden PL peak positions in the energy or wavelength spectrum? Would it be welcome to use such an approach in scientific publications?

Thanks

Ender

In recent years there has been a growing demand for the recognition of our work as a peer reviewer since this is the most important step to guarantee the quality of scientific publications. Unfortunately, for a long time this work has been anonymous and scarcely recognized in our curriculum and as a criterion for hiring and permanence.

Recently, Publon, the platform of Web of Science, has begun to register, in addition to the metrics of the number of publications and citations, a separate graphic for the peer reviews made in indexed journals. Although this could be still insufficient, I think it is an important step that should have influence on those who evaluate our academic activity.

The Publon website explains how to carry out this process. It's very simple

https://publons.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/12000012195-how-do-i-add-peer-reviews-to-publons-

How do I add peer reviews to Publons?

Modified on: Fri, 12 Apr, 2019 at 1:53 PM

Publons allows you to add reviews performed for journals or conferences to your public profile (with the privacy settings you choose). We can then verify your reviews, which can be used in promotion and funding applications.

There are four simple ways to populate your review record on Publons: 

Reviews performed for partnered journals can be instantly added to your profile as you do them. Simply follow these steps:

We send you a confirmation email on purpose to make sure we never collect review records from people who accidentally checked the box in the review submission form.

We make this two-step process even easier. Simply turn on the 'Automatically add reviews from partnered journals" setting in your profile settings. With this setting enabled, you just need to check the box in the review submission form and you're done!

* This option appears in the peer-review submission system the journal uses, such as ScholarOne or Editorial Manager.

If you've reviewed for journals that are not yet partnered with Publons, you can still add verified records of those reviews to your profile.

Publons verifies these emails with the journal and adds the record to your profile (subject to the journal's privacy policy).

You can speed things up by adding the review using the form on your Private Dashboard first, and including the URL of the review in your email to reviews@publons.com.

To see exactly how to add reviews through reviews@publons.com, please watch the video below:

Digging up old emails can take some time. So where we can, we’ll do the work for you! We work with our partners to look back at their review records for up to five years and update our users’ review history. Simply turn on the 'Automatically add reviews from partnered journals" setting in your profile settings and whenever we find a review, we'll add it to your profile and let you know. 

You’ll find the pre-publication review forms here. You can use these forms to add unverified pre-publication reviews which will appear on your profile with the privacy settings you specify.

Note that you are unable to create journal entries on Publons. If you would like to add a review for a journal not in our database through the forms on the site, please contact us with the journal title, URL and ISSN and any other relevant information and we'll add it for you.

.

How would you rate the activation of commercial banking loans, i.e. an attempt to stimulate economic activity and economic growth of the country through the policy of low central bank interest rates?

Under what economic conditions such a monetary policy may be conducted so as not to over-invest economic processes, i.e. not to overly high the level of investment processes and acceptance, most business entities have too high levels of investment risk and too high levels of credit risk by banks commercial?

How should the process of managing systemic risk in the central bank be improved and how should the process of credit risk management be improved in commercial banks so that no further financial crisis is generated?

I have answered these questions in my scientific publications whose links I have posted below.

In view of the above, inviting you to discuss the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

I invite you to discussion and cooperation.

Best wishes

Hi all,

I have submitted a paper for publication in June 2017 and I am wondering how long people generally wait? I submitted to a relatively small journal, Impact Factor ~ 1, and waited over 8 months for my first response from them (while their home page says it is generally 185 days ~ 6 months). I emailed them a couple of times during the process for a check, but they just said there is nothing they could do and they are waiting for the reviewer. I worked on the revisions promptly and returned them after a week. I was then told again that I would have to wait (this time about 2-3 weeks for a second revision). I got it back (2 months later) and it was conditionally accepted with more revisions requested. Again I worked on it promptly and re-submitted. Now it has been almost 3 months again. Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). Now I am not sure what to do, it feels like their deadlines keep getting pushed back, and they say there's nothing they can do and there has not been an update since the day after I submitted it. Should I request new reviewers or is that just the way it is? It has been over 16 months since I originally submitted the article.

Do you know one of the secrets to publishing high-quality papers lies in well-designed and clear data figures? How do you make data graphs? Do you mainly rely on intuition, common sense and precedents in published papers to make them? This is largely an unscientific approach.

There is a scientific method based on visual search and pattern perception to guide us in designing good, clear data graphs. Visual perception is little known among researchers. Hardly anybody in the science community is talking about it. Once we have learned it, we will see a huge change in the quality of your research articles.

This website https://designdatafigure.com is very helpful to students and scientists to design good, clear data figures for more successful scientific publications.

Is writing your scientific publications your passion?

If so, why?

Please reply

Best wishes

Dear Colleagues,

One question scratches a corner of my mind, so I decided to ask it here. Do you think that sometimes peer review (single or double-blind) is too harsh and too cruel against the manuscript? Even though I have managed to publish some papers so far, I still get the impression that the reviewers seek a perfect paper. Even if the reviews stick to the ethical boundaries, being too hard can discourage beginners like me. Also, I think sometimes they do it deliberately to show the superiority of their knowledge and experience. Similarly, some comments can be the comments that have been provided just for the sake of providing something. What do you think about it? Thank you beforehand.

Best

Ibrahim

Lets say you know very well the basics about writing, contents, formatting and style. Right before submission (your research is complete), do you focus only on the instructions for authors of the selected journal? Do you try to make the best/catchy title ever? Select a specific editor? do you contact the editor/journal before you submit? In short, Do you have a formula/method you apply? would you share it?

Despite certain disadvantages, peer-review is generally accepted as a quality control of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals. The higher the rank of the journal, the more often manuscripts are rejected by the Editor for various reasons (lack of novelty, routine work, low technical quality etc.). Getting you manuscript back with staggering reviewer comments is a rather frustrating experience. What are your personal tips and tricks to avoid rejection?

Lots of people are publishing research papers, but what is the impact of h index?

Conflict of interest in scientific publications

We often speak of conflicts of interest in the rules of publishers, but we do not cite the following case.

If the author and the reviewer are specialized in the same field and the author proposes a new method better than that of the reviewer (who, as the author himself published another method before), the reviewer will have an interest in refusing the article that competes with his. This situation can happen because the editor generally chooses the reviewer with a scientific profile close to the author. How can the author defend himself in such a situation?

Are sources of global or national financial, economic, debt, monetary and financial crises described and explained in recent years in scientific publications taken into account in financial supervision institutions in shaping prudential instruments, improving financial system security systems in order to increase this level of security and reduce risk potential future occurrence of similar, similar financial and economic crises, etc., thus improving the sustainable economic development of the country and the global economy?

Do you know examples of countries in which in recent years institutions of supervision over the financial system while shaping prudential instruments, improving financial systems security systems took into account the sources of global or national financial, economic, debt and monetary crises described and explained in recent years in scientific publications e.t.c.?

What types of prudential instruments, instruments of the process of improving financial risk management, including credit, liquidity, currency, debt or other, operational, market, etc. were improved by financial supervisors after the global financial crisis in 2008, which were proposed in the last years in scientific publications?

Is the importance of improving the credit risk management processes in financial institutions growing due to the continuation of processes and market situations occurring on financial markets, including capital markets, stock exchanges, used business practices in investment banking, forecasted decline in the global economic growth rate in 2019, emerging considerations about the subsequent re-evaluation of securities valuations, etc.?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

It is an uncommon skin condition that presented as a breast lump

The forest Europe indicator 4.3 Naturalness is focusing on: Area of forest and other wooded land, classified by “undisturbed by man”, by “semi-natural” or by “plantations”.

Are there any other (better?) indicators for assessing naturalness used nationally or at lower levels?

Would be happy to receive respective indicator factsheets and related scientific publications.

What is the future of scientific publishing in light of the trend of most journals to open access? And will this affect the quality of the scientific publication, as the view is still that the open-access is of lower quality and prestigious than the non-open one?

In some countries, rumors of cybercriminals with Ransomware are reportedly again being reported again. These viruses spread via e-mails, which automatically send themselves out from infected e-mail accounts and send out infected e-mails to all e-mail contacts of a virus mailbox infected with the virus. The virus is very dangerous because after opening a fake e-mail, the virus installs deeply into the computer and encrypts access to the disks by blocking access to the contents of the disks. I wrote scientific publications on this subject.

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question: Are cybercriminals now attacking personal and corporate computers using Ransomware viruses again?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

Covid lockdown really affected the ongoing research works and many researchers are facing problems in completing their tasks on time. At the same time, many completed works got published during this period also. Inviting your valuable opinions

Scientific publications increasing require depositing raw data files that may be accumulated over years and must be matched to the published figures. Furthermore papers are requiring more data and more types of data so it is taking a long time between publications. Yet, all those years of experiments need to be organized, sortable, and linked to any final figures for anything to be published. So ideally each data type in a publication quality figure will be selectable so one is able to efficiently display and carefully check any and all associated raw data. Also when organizing final figures one needs to be able to then place all the associated raw data into a depository with minimal steps. Would greatly appreciate any and all advice on what systems are available and their strengths, ease of use, and weaknesses or problems.

What aspect is generally more valued in scientific publications if you can get a research-based job: Quality or quantity?. I am currently a PhD student (materials science area), and I would appreciate any opinion about this issue.

Dear RG colleagues,

Let us discuss on what basis are the authors sequence in multi-authored publications is arranged? Does it depend only on the contribution’s weight of each author? How to estimate the contribution’s weight of each author? Are there other criteria to determine this arrangement? Thank you very much for sharing your opinions with us,

Kind regards

Apparently, on the financial markets and in macroeconomic determinants of the economic situation in particular sectors and entire economies of developed countries, there are symptoms that suggest a high probability of economic slowdown from 2020 in individual countries and, consequently, in the entire global economy.

Therefore, I am asking you: Do you know the forecasts of the global economic development that would suggest a high probability of deceleration (or possibly acceleration) of economic growth from 2020 in individual countries and, consequently, in the entire global economy?

What are the symptoms of potential changes in the financial markets and / or the scope of macroeconomic determinants of the economic situation in particular sectors and entire economies?

If you know the results of prognostic research in this area, please send links to websites or scientific publications in which this type of prognostic issues are taken.

I wish you the best in New Year 2019.

Best wishes

Dear colleagues,

Do any of you know of any company or freelancer that produces good infographics for scientific publications? I need to include several descriptive figures for my thesis and articles.

Thank you.

Do you know scientific publications describing the methodologies of the analysis of development potential and creditworthiness for investment projects planned for implementation by an innovative start-up?

Please reply

Best wishes

How much important FAIR data is?

Can't scientific publication be possible without FAIR data?

I have received comments from three reviewers. many of the comments are similar.

do i have to respond to the comments of all the three reviewers individually or can i write a consolidated response to all the three reviewers' comments.

please suggest me in this regard.

thanks in advance

As all of us are familiar with the different journal ranking systems and requirement conditions, in many cases we meet different kind of fees, charges for publishing our researches. Usually only the submitting and the previewing cost US$ 50-250, which is non-refundable and the paper may be rejected by the editors without being sent for review. Others introduce fees for the publishing US$ 500 -1000 (extra fees for colour graphs, maps etc. or for appeals against a Chief Editor's decision). For good English, they offer some links for the grammar review: US$ 100-200. Besides all of this, they employ embargo for 12-36 months, and ask US$ 600-2500 for open access. I think these fees sometimes unreasonable, so it is hard not to find the business factor behind them.

Recently, I found an article that has been published in IEEE Access (DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045008), which is directly copied from a research article of ours (DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04213-z). A lot of figures and tables, and the text in body of the paper are same as our published paper. Moreover, most of the data are the same or have been only slightly changed and the text in the finding and discussion section is also mostly identical. We can see the same text with the same references (see the attached file).

Regarding this essential problem we sent an email to the editor handling of the paper. Then, the first author of the paper sent us an email, in which he tried to persuade us to forgive him. In fact, he confessed to committed plagiarism and asked us for mercy. Following reporting the problem to the EIC we received an email from IEEE Access as an investigation outcome as follow. "In the present case, we performed an investigation and discussed the case with the EIC, IEEE Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and myself. We believe that the article overlap is small enough that it does not warrant any further investigation."

We spent so much time on our paper, and they have just looked at our paper, modified it, and written another one. This is not fair at all. What can we do now? I would appreciate any kind of help.

Nature Letters has historically been a "safety valve" for scientific publication in that it provided a way for a Nature Editor to allow the publication of short and possibly controversial pieces that might potentially be important, but that would find it difficult or impossible to pass normal peer-review.

In October 2019 Nature announced that the suspension of the Letters section was now a permanent feature of the journal's new redesign.

This is, obviously, the end of an era. Was the format redundant? Did the science community not produce enough interesting but controversial material to keep it going? Are scientists today more conservative than they used to be and less willing to take risks with their reputations? Does this leave the scientific community without a respected "official" channel for communicating controversial ideas and results?

Dear Colleagues, I hope someone can provide some answer :

I recently had notified by Research Gate that ELSEVIER editorial did notified them that they needed to take one Scientific Article I had on my Research Items down, due to violation of ELSEVIER's Copyright.

This article was published on the Journal "Nano Energy", of ELSEVIER's, and I appear as the first autor.

Is there a way to keep one of this articles on your RG Items without infringing the Copyrights of ELSEVIER ?

Can I try to upload it again? This time under the "Private" mode (not open sharing, but via request)

Or it's better to leave the matter alone? Meaning that all ELSEVIER's editorial articles cannot be shared freely on Research Gate ?

Thank You! Best Regards !

Friend, can I ask you a question?

Please, can you help me with the search for these pdf files that are scientific publications made in China?

1. Fengxing, Z., Zhizhen, G., Peiheng, C., Jinhua, M., & Yunsheng, C. (1993). A Study on the Phase Diagram of the Quinary System LiCl NaCl — KCl — MgCl_2 — H_2O (25 ℃) at Iso-Lithium Chloride Content [J]. Journal of Salt Lake Research, 3.

2. Fengxing, Z., Zhizhen, G., Peiheng, C., Jinhua, M., & Yunsheng, C. (1987). Studies on the Solubility and the Isothermal Evaporation Process in the Quinary System Li, Na, K, Mg / Cl-H_2O at 25 ℃ [J]. Chemical Research In Chinese Universities, 4.

3. Zongxi, L. J. W. L. Z. (1996). Heat Capacities, Heats of Dilution and Apparent Molal Enthalpies of LiCl-NaCl-KCl-MgCl_2-H_2O Systems at 298. 15K. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 1.

I think every matter is made up of fragments of energies. On that point, everything in nature is a creation of energies existing in the universe, even every living being.

So, what are the scientific evidence which has been proved? any scientific publications? laboratory findings using human and animal models? and Why human being doesn't feel internal and external universal energies which flowing and circulating internal body cavity and in the universe?

Yes, in my country, the Scopus indexing base is considered one of the most important. The Scopus database is recognized as the main scientific database for the indexation of scientific publications characterized by high citation. However, on a global scale, the bases of indexing scientific publications recognized in various countries by various centers and scientific institutions are at least a dozen or so. However, these various indexing bases are not usually fully comparable, they are functionally differentiated and thanks to that they are only partially substitutable, but more often they are complementary. The question of complementarity should be developed. Then it will serve the development of scientific research and international cooperation of scientific communities.

In view of the above, I am asking you with the following question: Is the Scopus database recognized in your country as the main database for the indexation of scientific publications?

And if not the Scopus database, which other database of publications and scientific journals is considered the most important in your country?

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

What do you think about this topic?

Please reply.

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation.

Thank you very much.

Best wishes.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Kindly share any available scientific publications related to this matter .

Many Thanks

Scientific publication involves inputs from the authors, editors (including copyeditors) reviewers, and some technical/office staff members. Interestingly, most copyeditors and some academic editors (in some publishing firms) are paid but the reviewers are left out despite being key players. On rare occasions, reviewers are awarded certificates. Can't reviewers enjoy benefits such as free access to publications (in subscription-based journals), service charge, 100% waiver on APC, etc? Do you think reviewers are well remunerated?

Our team in Australia is looking for international collaborators to do a joint research towards scientific publication on psoriasis treatment using our controlled-release formulation. If you are interested, please send us an email to: info@anni.com.au and we will give you details.

Recently, i found an author who has published a research article which is directly copied from a research article of mine. I have written to that journal editor on multiple occasions but received no response. What can i do? Please see the attachment of the copied published paper.

I simply need two columns: numbers of papers and year. The coverage should be from the 1800s (or early 1900) to date (for example, WoS covers only the period 1965–2020). Thanks in advance.

How to rate journal publications ? Based on the number of citations they gained or according to the impact factor of the journals in which the papers  get published ?

During recent decades, huge funds have been spent on research and scientific publication. Despite this, the world still faces many complex challenges and problems, such as climate changes, water scarcity, food insecurity, unemployment, poverty, infectious and chronic diseases. So, in your opinion, what changes in trends and practices of scientific research are needed to maximize the role of research in resolving real-world problems?

Hello,

my (almost) 4-year old daughter started tooth change recently (which is indeed pretty early). As she is a very tall girl (ca. 120 cm), I was wondering if body height could correlate more with permanent tooth emergence that age does. Does anyone know about scientific publications on this topic for Western European populations?

Thank you very much & kind regards

Helge

I analyzed the linear mixed model. Now, I want to summarize the results in a table for publication. I read some papers using this model and most of them put the estimated, SE, and p values in a table. Can I put only the F values (anova) and the probabilities instead?

Sincerely,

Yassine.

With the recent advent of numerous fraudulent medical articles on the subject of COVID-19, in multiple previously prestigious journals. Is it time to reveal the peer-reviewers and their potential conflicts, at the time of publication. I would love to know how these articles were authorized for publication. I am also sure that there are some "deep" editorial reviews happening right now. I know that there is still one major journal that has not yet retracted an article with definite "flaws" in it. Thank you for your appreciation nd support. June 08, 2020.

Scientific community is now facing a new threat of unethical publications in predatory journals.

How someone can identify the predatory journal?

Is there any authenticate list of predatory journals available?

Hello,

As you must know, it is now sometimes possible to have several co-first authors in the co-authorship of a scientific publication, when two persons led the paper and had equal contribution for example (with footnote about equal contribution).

I was wondering if having several co-last authors was also possible, considering that in my research field the last author is the one who mentored the publication project.

Have you ever done this in one of your publications or seen a publication where this has been done?

Many thanks for your answers!

Julien

What kind of scientific research dominate in the field of Research Gate knowledge and science portal?

Please, provide your suggestions for a question, problem or research thesis in the issues: Research Gate knowledge and science portal.

Please reply.

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Usually, the author of the review article is known in a certain area, with good publications history, in order to cover the topic. I think the review article should provide a new hypothesis or should concentrate and summarize a certain point that is needed to be reviewed. Thus, any one can write a review or should be invited by the editorial board.

I am curious to know why a methodology will get acceptance in one journal for a given topic and get rejected in another journal for another topic. Take Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) application in Civil Engineering problems for an example. You find Civil Engineering journals accepting or rejecting papers with ANN methodology. How can one overcome these barriers?

As a reviewer, in your view what are the criteria you use to accept or reject a paper with machine learning applications?

If a machine learning method that has not been previously used is applied to a model (a common topic ), how do you as a reviewer respond?

What is the best software to draw the Graphical abstract in scientific publications? Apart from PowerPoint

Thanks in Advance

Hello,

my organization is building up a database cross-referencing particular scientific publications. My question is: How can I track the citations of our database?

Thanks for the help,

Dilyana

Hello all, I am writing my first paper and I am struggling to create figures with the right resolution and size. In fact, when I increase the resolution, the size of the image becomes too small. Do you know a way to get around this?

Help on this would be much appreciated.

Thank you!

I work on the recommendation of scientific publications in an academic social network.

thank you

Dear researchers,

Due to Covid-19 pandemic, having virtual presentation as alternative tool in presenting papers in international conferences have risen tremendously. Conferences/meetings is an important event in a researchers life, because you can meet other researchers and have the chance to hear from plenary speaker. Did you experience virtual presentations? Please share your thoughts and experience! Thank you!

When submitting a manuscript, many journals request that figures and tables be placed at the end of the text. However, as an author and also as a referee, I find this frustrating. What are your thoughts on the matter, am I the only person annoyed by this? Why do journals insist on it?

Since some journals have electronic ISSN or print ISSN only.

Can you recommend technical and scientific publications on mining and subsequent use in the architecture of Ammonitico Rosso?