Science topics: Science EducationScientific Illustration and Animation
Science topic
Scientific Illustration and Animation - Science topic
This topic is intended for anyone who wants to communicate effectively about science. Research scientists that need declarative scientific illustrations for publications and presentations. Medical and life science students for educational purposes. Scientific writers and other science professionals to convey their message in a visual attractive way.
Questions related to Scientific Illustration and Animation
The visual communication of scientific information is a key aspect for sharing and discussing scientific insights. Nevertheless, many images in the science landscape or popular discussions are visually unattractive or scientifically unprecise. Do you think scientific illustrations and visualizations are important for popular science in particular?
My greatest frustration growing up was not finding very good shots of different species in field guides, and then later learning I could possibly not be able to use fabulous images because of legalities.
What is your own experience with finding/using images, and what does the scientific community need graphic-wise currently in your field or in general?
Thanks!
Hi There,
I hope you are well.
Currently, I am studying a masters in Molecular Biology at Potsdam University, but I also work in Science Communication.
A colleague and I are founding a collective and shared office for people working in science communication.
We recently visited a potential office space in Prenzlauer Berg and are looking for likeminded people who would like to rent a working space and join the collective.
Apart from a science degree, potential candidates should also have some form of communication skills, e.g. illustration, animation, writing, marketing or conference production.
If this sounds like you, then please feel free to get in touch by emailing me at vizbio@gmail.com
We look forward to hearing from you!
All the best,
Joel
P.s. check out my colleague Thomas' visualisations at https://www.scistyle.com/
I would should be grateful if you could give me some names of books in Turkish.
We need to present an illustration of a cells' electric field with its charges and explain it using physics.
Video abstracts come in a variety of forms (have a look, e.g., at the Cell youtube-channel) and lately I tried to establish a format I can offer to other scientists. I decided to have very short abstracts (not longer than 2 minutes), which can be produced quickly and inexpensively. (The contents of the paper is summarized in a few and short sentences and is illustrated by schematic drawings set up during the video/have a look at my youtube-channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCittg4tLzmxR_xsgWlwXpxA) for examples).
Do you think something like this is suitable or do you prefer other forms as, for example, interviews or animations?
I need to show the molecular self assembly as monolayer, helical twisted structure and tubular structure. Can someone recommend a good software?
I hope there might be the particular software through which we can draw the cell membrane, lymphocytes cells, glial cells and sometimes brain slices. Do you know any of these software so that we can draw the figures of biological components ?
More and more journals include an option to submit graphical abstracts these days. It should summarize the presented data in one concise illustration or schematic.
I would like to know what you think of this evolution in scientific publishing. Is visual representation of data becoming more and more important and should it become part of the skill set of a researcher?
I am always fascinated by the kind of diagrams that people publish in Cell, Nature, Science etc.. I want to get such a software that can help me in my research.
I'm looking for a simple but efficient software to draw and design devices (such as the attached image) in 3D.
Thanks
How to best defend Procedurally Generated Animation vs Conventionally used animation Techniques? Like Keyframe Vs Motion Capture VS PGA vs Phy. Dyn.
I have real data of various cellular components, and dispersion over time in various stress situations. I want to make an average 3d model per time in each stress using the data. I tried Virtual Cell and other softwares like that, but all are based on simulations and not on real data.
My experiences in the design profession have given me various graphic skills; 3D Studio MAX, as well as a variety of other computer graphics packages.
I am curious to know whether I could actually use these skills to somehow compliment my research interests in microbiology, biochemistry, medicine, etc. Does anyone have experience with illustrators in these fields? I imagine the demand for still images might be limited but that there could still be a significant demand for animations.
I'm interested to know why people use powerpoint to make figures. Is it because they don't have graphical skills or backgrounds or are there other reasons.
In my opinion it does. Especially for review papers. A paper can benefit substantially from good visualizations, it makes the content more understandable and clear. Other scientists like to cite this work over a paper more difficult to understand.
Moreover, scientists have presentations in meetings and seminars all the time. In the introduction, the best available figure in their field of work is used quite often. This will encourage people in the audience to write down the reference. I bet they will cite the original paper next time they write something related to the subject. (of course the research has to be good).
I'm very curious to hear your opinion about this.
I recently came across a neat animation done in HTML5+JS and started wondering what the pros and contras of HTML5 versus SVG were. Anyone have any insight on that?
The bezier curves in SVG are sufficiently limited that most interesting physical behaviour is going to need dedicated calculation. I've heard good things about the controls available in HTML5 so perhaps SVG has no benefits over images created in HTML5 other than static ones.
I'm making a series of inheritance patterns, mainly for educational purposes. You can see an example in the attachment.
I'm looking for some critical feedback on this. What is good and especially what can be improved in your opinion?
Hi there,
I'd love to hear your thoughts about what you think will be the next generation scientific visualization approach. Will it be interactive? More photo-realistic? What are the skills we need to learn today to keep up in the future?
I am giving a presentation to an undergraduate audience and was going to make my own slides, but first wanted to make sure I wasn't reinventing any wheels. I've seen a lot of great images in publications, but most are either specific images of synapses or more complex network descriptions, and I'm ideally looking for a representative animation. Thanks!
I am working on collaborative scientific visualization. I want to understand what scientists really get out of an image. Is it just a confirmation of some expected result? Do they need a precise illustration or just an image that confirms or rejects what was expected from the data collected? What do they expect from the image?
Share with us your most inspirational scientific illustration or animation. The one we cannot live without.